Database Users

Kernels

Hello
Can anyone point me to a guide or summary of alternative kernels please?

You can check our work on the nook color linux kernels in this thread here. http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1370873&page=285
I also have a guide on using the Git and the Gerrit code review down in cyanogenMod central for the nook color linux tree at this thread link here. http://forum.cyanogenmod.com/topic/50994-follow-along-with-me-trying-to-learn-how-to-code/
If you want to help and have experience on building linux kernels feel free to post a follow up in the first link I have posted. We are using the git and the github to commit code for our linux kernel tree. If you need help on getting up and going on using git, look through the second link I gave, I have all of the links on the github for our project and other helpful tips for you to get started. Right now the top developers are committing code to the jellybean branches. <fat tire> is our top developer and github maintainer for the nook color linux kernel tree, you can find him in the first link I provided and can help you also.

Thanks. I'm able to put a kernel together, but i haven't much experience in original development. I'll keep an eye on that thread though!

Right now we are looking for a few debuggers for the Jelly Bean Kernels. You know how to use debuggers? We need to check for kernel opps that are not being caught by the machines. Last year here there was a developer that rooted 2 kernel opps out and submitted them to Gerrit as a patch. Henk Poley , the developer for the Git extentions used his app and rooted out a few kernel opps on the cyanogenMod stable 7.1 at the time. Check out the my link on debuggers if you are not sure how. Not glamous work but it needs done, and I am getting up and ready to go back to school. Might do that if you want to help.
<Eyeballer> here is looking for someone to strip out all the unnecessary phone .apks for the nook color cyanogenMod builds, like the phone.apk and the telephony.apk along with the voicedialer.apk. I was going to get started on doing that but got sidetracked on getting a proper workflow going on the github. That second thread has links on how to submit work and patches down at cyanogenMod.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you are up to a more difficult challenge the wi-fi module needs more work on the Jelly bean builds, they are still getting wake lock problems with it. A few months ago the developers disassembled and reassembled the wi fi module and could not find any code conflicts within the driver or the module. They can fill you in on that up in IRC at #nook color if you want to follow up on that.

Wow. Uh, I don't actually use a debugger, I'm pretty new to building kernels. I used to program C++ in Visual Studio, but so far haven't investigated the debugging process. In my own kernels I use printk, and that's about as sophisticated as it gets.
I wish I could help, but I need the device to available at the moment for my young daughter. Good luck with JB. I'll consider helping if my situation changes.

[Q] How to build Paranoid Android from source

Does anyone have a recent or mako specific guide on how to build Paranoid Android builds, I'd like to cherry pick a few smaller features into the already powerful ROM.
Would following the OmniRom guide and basically replacing the Omni values with the correct Paranoid Android values work out? Or is there other specific stuff I need to do?
I've got Ubuntu 13.04 & currently building OmniRom whenever I see there's a bit of a decent update but other then that I'm pretty much a noob .

http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1863547
Basically just clone the PA source, add the mako specific stuff (kernel, device, and vendor from TheMuppets repo) and compile. If you have any other questions just ask in the thread a linked above.

[Q] Python Issues when running a certain application

Hi all! First post to xda-developers, hoping for some assistance with an app that ran fine on stock, now not running on OmniROM. The application is Katawa Shoujo Ver5, the 334MB Monolithic release. I logcatted it down to an error that basically tells me that it cannot open _imaging.so and _sqlite3.so. I researched and found that these libraries belonged to a whole laundry list of 32bit libraries that my python 2.7 does not have. So, I have to figure out how to either add these libs manually or import them into python, how would I go about fixing the issue??
Device: SGH-T999L (T-Mobile)
ROM: OmniROM 4.4.4
Kernel: BMS (Not sure of exact, my phone is dead atm, sorry!) Will Update if needed when I get home
Linux Version: 3.4.y

austinyork1 said:
Hi all! First post to xda-developers, hoping for some assistance with an app that ran fine on stock, now not running on OmniROM. The application is Katawa Shoujo Ver5, the 334MB Monolithic release. I logcatted it down to an error that basically tells me that it cannot open _imaging.so and _sqlite3.so. I researched and found that these libraries belonged to a whole laundry list of 32bit libraries that my python 2.7 does not have. So, I have to figure out how to either add these libs manually or import them into python, how would I go about fixing the issue??
Device: SGH-T999L (T-Mobile)
ROM: OmniROM 4.4.4
Kernel: BMS (Not sure of exact, my phone is dead atm, sorry!) Will Update if needed when I get home
Linux Version: 3.4.y
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Um, Omni does not include python to begin with, so... Issues you're having with third-party apps missing components (from an Omni perspective, python on a mobile device is a third-party app) aren't something relevant to Omni
Oh yeah, your device is also not officially supported. Even of the d2 family were, an alternate kernel means you have a modified configuration and we're not going to waste time on it. Argue that your issue is kernel-related all you want, it shows that you've modified the system so who knows what else you hacked.

Regarding Android 10 on the HP Touchpad

Hello
For the past couple (weeks) I've been trying to compile Android 10 for tenderloin using the Android 9 sources but it's not going so well. First thing I ran into multiple sepolicy errors and I feel as if I fixed them in inappropriate ways but the errors went away. Other errors regarding camera and audio and such, that are regarding that tenderloin no longer uses the legacy audio format. Made me confused because I used the device sources form Evervolv and DIrty unicorns and if i'm correct they built it exactly the same way they uploaded it. After these errors were wrapped up, I got a error at zipping the rom that it could not zip due to failure of being able to read build.prop. This made me believe that the sources are not correctly formatted. If anyone can help me find a manifest, I can build for all you guys. Please keep tenderloin alive!
Now, I did something and I'm getting plenty of perl errors. Maybe I'm just very unlucky. I'm gonna attempt to reinstall on a fresh drive on my server.
If its anyone's concern, I was building lineage 17.1. I noticed for example, Lineage's "qcom-device" repo was shaped completely differently than Evervolvs qcom-device repo.
This led me to thought that Android 10 is going to be extremely difficult because of all the upstream dev changes that was pushed to Q. If any of you would like, I could probably push out March patches Pie rom because over there I'm mostly safe of complying with the source.
My manifest shape
DirtyUnicorn's device-tree
DirtyUnicorn's device-tree-common
DirtyUnicorn's htc-msm8960-kernel
Evervolv's vendor
And dirty unicorn's atheros wlan driver
I have been changing up the device tree so much, it almost looks ridiculous . From what I heard lots of properties on the device tree haven't been touched for years. Maybe tomorrow I can try Evervolv's Q rom. If you guys can help me build up my manifest, we can push out a fully working Q rom for tenderloin. And it would be just in time when Android 11 comes out. Thank you everyone!

I wish that I could offer any help, but I never tried to compile any Android ROM or for the HP_TP.
To my knowledge the only users that I know that could offer some insight on the process would be:
 @flintman
 @elginsk8r
Also the LuneOS project could offer some help:
https://pivotce.com/tag/luneos/
If Android Q(10) can not be ported to the HP_TP, then at least P(9) is a good ROM to keep updating that could provide many years of App support.

Theres no reason why exactly it cant,, because lots of roms I hear were built off the original TP sources (From 2011!). It was only around 2016 when guys around here had to change it up so much that they should've been so surprised that it worked. I can try and temporarily maintain P roms until the boys around here push out sources for Q!

djared704 said:
Theres no reason why exactly it cant,, because lots of roms I hear were built off the original TP sources (From 2011!). It was only around 2016 when guys around here had to change it up so much that they should've been so surprised that it worked. I can try and temporarily maintain P roms until the boys around here push out sources for Q!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To my limited knowledge is all about Hardware -->> Drivers -->> ( Kernel ).
The reason that Bluetooth and camera does not work on newer Android version is due to the old (proprietary drivers) and the Kernel. That takes more dedication and work than the ROM. The same rules applies to the desktop, older processors does not support certain features and the Operating System will not run. It is possible to disable the features in the kernel so that it does not check the hardware and make it run, but it will be unstable.
Everything could be possible with plenty of time, knowledge and dedication.

HP_TOUCHPAD said:
To my limited knowledge is all about Hardware -->> Drivers -->> ( Kernel ).
The reason that Bluetooth and camera does not work on newer Android version is due to the old (proprietary drivers) and the Kernel. That takes more dedication and work than the ROM. The same rules applies to the desktop, older processors does not support certain features and the Operating System will not run. It is possible to disable the features in the kernel so that it does not check the hardware and make it run, but it will be unstable.
Everything could be possible with plenty of time, knowledge and dedication.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When I look at the tenderloin source, the script to gather the camera driver is disabled. Camera isnt a huge deal though because its only 1.3 MP. However we use the MSM 8960 kernel from HTC and that is the one m7,, but the one m7 is a SD 600 device so it loses sense. I was gonna get some help with one of my kernel developer buddies to dev a kernel for android 10 for tenderloin. If you see the one m7 has Lineage 17.1 available and even though it doesnt have same chipset, if im correct both chipsets went off of the same assembly line process. Lineage 17.1 for the one m7 also packages it as a "uimage" which is what we use. I believe this was only a very small select of devices. Yeah about that ive been getting so many complaints during build about "mkimage" which should've been a prebuilt tool in the lineage source. Don't know why they removed it, or if our developers added it in by their selves, etc. Anyways I fixed that error by just "allowing" mkimage in one of the permission files in my environment. But yeah i went as far as the build packaging the ROM and it complaining it cannot read build.prop. Note the build.props are generated by the environment , not the source (even though the device data is gathered by the source, its not what im talking about). I even go to the directory it was complaining about and it was all there. One of my friends suggested a permission error. I changed permissions to 777 (rw to all users) and it would still output that error. By that point I trashed my build meaning I may of done something wrong early on. I will let someone else continue building 10 but I will continue building 9 with latest patches.

It will be extremely impressive if any kernel developer will update the HP Touchpad Kernel or tweak it for future release, well everything will stop once Android becomes 64 only.
I am sure you are very well aware, but I will suggest using this built:
https://forum.xda-developers.com/hp-touchpad/development/rom-evervolv-hp-touchpad-t3923512
I was able to do the following playing around recompiling the Kernel. I recompile almost all the ROM and incorporated the same kernel changes.
https://forum.xda-developers.com/hp-touchpad/general/hp-touchpad-optimize-android-swap-t3901773
The Ramdisk is also very easy to unpack and repack:
https://forum.xda-developers.com/hp-touchpad/general/hp-touchpad-novacom-repair-android-t3960435
There is no need to get the original Camera or Bluetooth working, only sound and WiFi.

HP_TOUCHPAD said:
It will be extremely impressive if any kernel developer will update the HP Touchpad Kernel or tweak it for future release, well everything will stop once Android becomes 64 only.
I am sure you are very well aware, but I will suggest using this built:
https://forum.xda-developers.com/hp-touchpad/development/rom-evervolv-hp-touchpad-t3923512
I was able to do the following playing around recompiling the Kernel. I recompile almost all the ROM and incorporated the same kernel changes.
https://forum.xda-developers.com/hp-touchpad/general/hp-touchpad-optimize-android-swap-t3901773
The Ramdisk is also very easy to unpack and repack:
https://forum.xda-developers.com/hp-touchpad/general/hp-touchpad-novacom-repair-android-t3960435
There is no need to get the original Camera or Bluetooth working, only sound and WiFi.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think I probably stated somewhere, but Evervolvs "device" tree would just spit out hundreds of errors, and I fixed this by switching to Dirty Unicorns device tree. I also tried flintman's device tree and it didn't spit out many errors. Thanks for this though.

djared704 said:
I think I probably stated somewhere, but Evervolvs "device" tree would just spit out hundreds of errors, and I fixed this by switching to Dirty Unicorns device tree. I also tried flintman's device tree and it didn't spit out many errors. Thanks for this though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have only recompile the Kernel and all of them work, but the correct branch must be use. I can not say about building a ROM, never done it.
But Evervovs Pie by elginsk8r works very well and stable as it uses the same kernel, but the framework is different. I guess elginsk8r will be the only that can guide you on the right direction or flintman.
Have fun learning, it takes a lot of TIME!

[SOLVED!] Bluetooth doesn't work after compiling a kernel based on LOS 18.1 sources.

I'm kinda new here, so please excuse me if this is not the best place to ask and it should instead be posted in another section.
First, a bit of context: I recently bought a refurbished H910 to practice android development since it was fairly cheap, and after testing its features and unlocking the bootloader to install custom roms, i opted to start compiling a kernel of my own with some changes to begin involving myself with the development side of things. For now, i am using the Lineage OS 18.1 kernel sources on github as a base for the kernel, then after making sure that the kernel compiled, i flashed it into the phone and basically everything works with the only exception being the bluetooth, and maybe the IR Blaster, but that one is working just like the stock kernels on different Android 11 roms.
Now getting to the issue itself in more details... it boils down to the phone's bluetooth refusing to turn on while running that custom kernel of mine on any Android 11 ROM, be it Lighthouse, Superior OS Xcalibur or Lineage 18.1, the bluetooth tile gets stuck on the "Turning on..." icon animation for a while and then returns to the disabled state. Reverting to the stock kernels or even using other custom kernels like Lyb's or Gamma make the Bluetooth work again without needing a wipe, which tells me that the problem is definitely somewhere in my kernel. I could of course test it on some Android 10 ROMs, but the outcome will most likely be the same.
I even took some logcats via ADB Shell but they are kind of broad and mostly explain that the service had some problems with "com.android.bluetooth service has died: psvc PER", followed by a "scheduled restart of crashed service com.android.bluetooth...". Both of which never happen on those ROM's stock kernels, where the bluetooth works as expected. I looked around on Lyb/Gamma kernel sources on github, and there aren't any major differences to the defconfigs for example with the bluetooth driver configuration also being just about the same.
I'm not sure if this will be of any help, but as for the toolchains and compilers, i am using clang 11.0.2 383902b1 as the main compiler, gcc 4.9 as the ARM32 cross-compiler, and gcc from 4.9 up to 10.3 as the AARCH64 cross-compiler, all running on Manjaro. I also changed that combination dozens of times, but to no avail.
So am i missing something during the compilation process? With all those things i already checked, i keep getting a feeling that something really simple is going over my head. Also, i can post the link to my github repository here if needed, there's a branch made specifically to check the BT since it has only the changes made to assure that the kernel compiles.
Edit: The problem was solved!!! It actually comes down to using the exact toolchains provided by the lineage OS source tree for the device (that might be optional, but it's how i managed to get it working) and checking if everything has been installed correctly. It seems some files failed to download the last time i did a 'repo sync' on the source and that was what might have caused this.