I retrained my launch phrase to be Ok Moto Now and it works better than OK Google Now, plus it doesn't feel as stupid to say!
Cozume said:
I retrained my launch phrase to be Ok Moto Now and it works better than OK Google Now, plus it doesn't feel as stupid to say!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cool - just by training? Or did you change something in the system?
You probably will have many more false positives.
Enviado de meu XT1058 usando Tapatalk
yeticomes said:
Cool - just by training? Or did you change something in the system?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes, just by retraining.
lucfig said:
You probably will have many more false positives.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why, it is the same number of syllables? And Moto is somewhat an unusual word like Google.
This is actually a topic I was going to start on Reddit a few days ago. How "Ok Moto" is so much easier to say, and just makes more sense than the ridiculous phrase they came up with. It's also adding to their brand recognition every time someone sees/hears you use it.
I recall reading here that when someone looked into the code that handles decoding the phrase the original may have been "hello moto". The "OK google now" was clearly a google influence. I have tried various other word combos but none work as well as "ok google now", the code is clearly optimized for it.
Steve-x said:
I recall reading here that when someone looked into the code that handles decoding the phrase the original may have been "hello moto". The "OK google now" was clearly a google influence. I have tried various other word combos but none work as well as "ok google now", the code is clearly optimized for it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have been testing it for hours now and the OK Moto Now works better for me. YMMV.
Wade-0 said:
This is actually a topic I was going to start on Reddit a few days ago. How "Ok Moto" is so much easier to say, and just makes more sense than the ridiculous phrase they came up with. It's also adding to their brand recognition every time someone sees/hears you use it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ITA and it works better for me. Late at night when I am tired or if I have been drinking, I can't even pronounce Google properly, lol! Moto is so much easier to say and not as stupid sounding.
Been trying this with no success - it's as if it realizes I'm saying something other than "Ok Google Now", says "Sorry didn't catch that". Do I need to clear data?
Cozume said:
ITA and it works better for me. Late at night when I am tired or if I have been drinking, I can't even pronounce Google properly, lol! Moto is so much easier to say and not as stupid sounding.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I dropped the "Now" entirely and so far it seems to work just fine with "OK Moto!". Will run with it until I notice any problems. It complained a bit on the 3rd training attempt, but I finally got it to accept the new phrase.
Wade-0 said:
I dropped the "Now" entirely and so far it seems to work just fine with "OK Moto!". Will run with it until I notice any problems. It complained a bit on the 3rd training attempt, but I finally got it to accept the new phrase.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I did that, too and it is working fine for me. Much easier to say OK Moto. And no big deal to retrain if it gives me false positives.
I found just OK moto was activating it when just saying OK. By changing it to ok moto now it works just like saying OK Google now.
Sent from my XT1080 using xda app-developers app
Why not "Hellloooo Moto"?
Sent from my XT1053 using Tapatalk
cannondale0815 said:
Why not "Hellloooo Moto"?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tried Hello Moto and it wouldn't take it.
For the same number of syllables, I'm surprised nobody has suggested "OK Moto X" yet.
UncleMike said:
For the same number of syllables, I'm surprised nobody has suggested "OK Moto X" yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That works, too; it is just that it responds before I even get to say "X". So it is really responding to "OK Moto".
rsage said:
Been trying this with no success - it's as if it realizes I'm saying something other than "Ok Google Now", says "Sorry didn't catch that". Do I need to clear data?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It should say/show that your phrase is incorrect. Given enough times it will set it to whatever you say. Mine would respond to "Ok Moo Cow" but the ambient noise issues and accidental dials when I was doing nothing made me change back.
I've had numerous false activations while driving, and once while it was in my pocket. Oh well, it was worth a shot.
Sent from my XT1060 using Tapatalk
Related
So for the past few weeks I've been using the speech to text, speaking slowly and enunciating every word as much as I can so that it gets it perfectly. But it always messes up. Hmm.
Well, the past few days I've started speaking faster, and I've noticed that it comes out with better accuracy. Even if I speak sometimes really fast, it still gets it perfectly. Anyone else have similar results?
What about some other tips and tricks for using the speech to text?
(One is of course swipe the keyboard left to right to bring up the voice input.)
Also, you can say "period" and "exclamation mark". What else is there?
And how do you do capital letters?
It must be caching your previous STT (speech to text) files, so that could explain why it seems to get better.
another n00b question
this feature requires data services right? from what i've heard your voice is sent to google's servers for processing, is that correct?
britoso said:
It must be caching your previous STT (speech to text) files, so that could explain why it seems to get better.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope, I just said buzz.google.com for the first time and it got it perfectly
creepinshadow said:
another n00b question
this feature requires data services right? from what i've heard your voice is sent to google's servers for processing, is that correct?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep. In my case, I never use 3g. I use the service when connected to wifi
Paul22000 said:
Nope
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope what?
britoso said:
Nope what?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No it's not caching and just repeating what I said previously, because it's getting things perfectly that I've never said before.
Paul22000 said:
No it's not caching and just repeating what I said previously, because it's getting things perfectly that I've never said before.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If its caching, its for things you've spoken before....not for things you speak for the first time. Thats what caching means. It could also be part of the intelligence code on Google's side.
britoso said:
If its caching, its for things you've spoken before....not for things you speak for the first time. Thats what caching means. It could also be part of the intelligence code on Google's side.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That was my point, that it's NOT caching. I know what caching is. Re-read the last few replies; your confusion on the "nope" mixed you up badly.
Does anyone know whether Google's voice recognition software does in fact cache things, i.e. you can "train" it into understanding you better over time? I'm asking this because my accent's not exactly standard American, so I haven't made much use of the feature (it does get many of the things I say admirably, though).
you can spell words for it, i'm not sure if you can do spaces or not though, I haven't tried.
How do you get voice search to Navigate to a someone's address? (Home Screen -> Search button)
I said "Navigate to John Doe's Home" and it got it 100% perfectly, but it doesn't actually bring navigate to my contact's address.
What's the trick to making that work?
grainysand said:
Does anyone know whether Google's voice recognition software does in fact cache things, i.e. you can "train" it into understanding you better over time? I'm asking this because my accent's not exactly standard American, so I haven't made much use of the feature (it does get many of the things I say admirably, though).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Someone somewhere said something about it learns as it goes, or it gets better at understanding you. I'd like to know how, as there is no way to tell it if it got things right...
I was trying to tell it 'Post Buzz' and it got it wrong every time, there was no way for it to learn, if I couldn't tell it when it was getting it wrong.
Paul22000 said:
I know what caching is.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Apparently you don't, as per the following statement (involving 'Nope'). I'm not going to reply about this matter anymore.
Paul22000 said:
Nope, I just said buzz.google.com for the first time and it got it perfectly
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
britoso said:
Apparently you don't, as per the following statement (involving 'Nope'). I'm not going to reply about this matter anymore.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good, your idiocy is not needed in my thread I tried to explain, but you didn't understand, so sure, good riddance.
Let me check though, cause I'm confused. I thought caching was all about storing and bringing back something that had been used before? If it was the first time he said it, how had it cached that phrase before?
AndyCr15 said:
Let me check though, cause I'm confused. I thought caching was all about storing and bringing back something that had been used before? If it was the first time he said it, how had it cached that phrase before?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's what I was wondering... Apparently britoso's " definition " of caching is different from ours
britoso said:
It must be caching your previous STT (speech to text) files, so that could explain why it seems to get better.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Paul22000 said:
Nope, I just said buzz.google.com for the first time and it got it perfectly
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess I will have to post
AndyCr15 said:
Let me check though, cause I'm confused. I thought caching was all about storing and bringing back something that had been used before? If it was the first time he said it, how had it cached that phrase before?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Andy, Your definition is exactly the same as mine. However Paul starts his retort (quoted) with a negative (nope) and tries to back it up by admitting that he said buzz.google.com for the first time and it worked. (absolutely no caching involved in this case so his 'nope' makes no sense and does not disqualify my statement. Hence the nope is pointless/illogical and only serves to demean me , His future posts (quoted below) illuminate his attitude/character quite clearly. ).
If it worked fine the first time and you accepted the translation...great.
Only accepted translations are remembered by the intelligence/caching logic. You can prove this my mumbling a few in-between words of a sentence that was translated correctly in the past... the translation will still be accurate.
Some memorable quotes:
Paul22000 said:
Good, your idiocy is not needed in my thread I tried to explain, but you didn't understand, so sure, good riddance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Paul22000 said:
That's what I was wondering... Apparently britoso's " definition " of caching is different from ours
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
britoso said:
Andy, Your definition is exactly the same as mine. However Paul starts his retort (quoted) with a negative (nope) and tries to back it up by admitting that he said buzz.google.com for the first time and it worked. (absolutely no caching involved in this case so his 'nope' makes no sense and does not disqualify my statement. Hence the nope is pointless/illogical and only serves to demean me , His future posts (quoted below) illuminate his attitude/character quite clearly. ).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You suggested that his increasing successes were due to caching.
If caching were the (only*) reason for the increasing successes then he would only be seeing increased successes on phrases he has previously spoken.
In fact, he is seeing increasing successes with phrases that he has never spoken before. This is counter-evidence to your theory that caching was the reason for the successes.
Thus, he does not believe your theory is correct. "Nope" may be a brusque way of saying that, but his counterexample does, actually, weigh heavily against your suggestion so a negative response is warranted.
(*) You said "It must be..." which would tend to imply that your suggestion was the only reason behind why things would be improving. His counterexample minimally indicates that it cannot be the "only" reason for improved successes, but if you want to relax your statement to "One reason might be that it caches" then his counterexample doesn't strictly rule out your suggestion, but it means that there have to be other factors coming into play as well which are helping it understand him better on new phrases.
I'm with farbear. The way I see it, you basically said 'It got it right because you've said it before and it remembers' and he said 'Nope, it's the first time I said it' you then got all upset... I really don't get it.
So many people/blogs all keep saying its just a copy of Siri or that voice command is useless. But what's new is that this is active all the time. E.g. You can answer a call, snooze alarm etc with just voice and no need to start an app.
AFAIK this is a first. So many things can be done and it will only get better.
Is it really completely handsfree???
Thats what I also thought when samsung described the S-voice.
But then after watching all the videos, I reckon its not completely handsfree.
For example for the lock screen, you need to first press the power button or home button to get the screen on, and then say the command to unlock it.
Correct me if I am wrong.
sub1n said:
Thats what I also thought when samsung described the S-voice.
But then after watching all the videos, I reckon its not completely handsfree.
For example for the lock screen, you need to first press the power button or home button to get the screen on, and then say the command to unlock it.
Correct me if I am wrong.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i was wondering this and they made it sound like its completely hands free but that would be too good to be true probably unless it affects battery...
sub1n said:
Thats what I also thought when samsung described the S-voice.
But then after watching all the videos, I reckon its not completely handsfree.
For example for the lock screen, you need to first press the power button or home button to get the screen on, and then say the command to unlock it.
Correct me if I am wrong.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
"Hey Galaxy!"
Dude I can say "Hey Siri Whats the weather" and itll answer lawl
Sent from my SGH-T989 using XDA
it isn't special anymore because it can now be used on every phone.
omersak said:
it isn't special anymore because it can now be used on every phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not any longer...starting today, Vlingo servers are denying requests from the S-Voice app not installed on an SGS3. It was fun while it lasted... fortunaltely, flipboard isn't doing the same.
enigmaamit said:
Not any longer...starting today, Vlingo servers are denying requests from the S-Voice app not installed on an SGS3. It was fun while it lasted... fortunaltely, flipboard isn't doing the same.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
fair enough. but this is funny because reminds me a bit of apple - and how they said siri will only be on the 4S because the artificial intelligence algorithm requires at least a dual-core processor and what not. next thing you know it gets hacked and runs flawlessly on an iphone 2g
i would say, it's good, that the device has a lock-screen mode too, because when i have it in my pocket, i'm not interrested in starting programs or calls
but the S Voice will be for sure an awesome feature - i hope it will work for all languages fine
and about using it on different devices - i would imagine, that it could end in a developer <-> producer ping-pong same like siri?!
enigmaamit said:
Not any longer...starting today, Vlingo servers are denying requests from the S-Voice app not installed on an SGS3. It was fun while it lasted... fortunaltely, flipboard isn't doing the same.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess that explains why mine no longer works. Bummer.
Sent from an HTC Vivid via XDA Premium
enigmaamit said:
Not any longer...starting today, Vlingo servers are denying requests from the S-Voice app not installed on an SGS3. It was fun while it lasted... fortunaltely, flipboard isn't doing the same.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Jirv311 said:
I guess that explains why mine no longer works. Bummer.
Sent from an HTC Vivid via XDA Premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This would also explain why it Says something about network and not doing anything on the wifes Nexus, as I was sure it was working before
Has anyone tried to change their build prop to mirror GSIII ? and see if it works then, I would but the wife would have fit if I messed with her's
it is a shame it doesn't work anymore on my One X, but I don't blame Samsung for disabling it. I'm about to throw down $700 on this phone so I want it to keep its exclusives as much as possible haha.
Other than that, I would feel bad for all those people that worked together to integrated it only for it to get pirated.
I read somewhere that the G2 was one of a few phones, aside from the Moto X and the other new Droids, that has the necessary hardware to support the software Motorola uses for the Touchless Controls, the whole "Okay Google Now" thing. Has anyone tried to port this software over to the G2 yet? I bought my mother the Moto X, and have to admit the feature is pretty cool. I would do it myself, except the fact that I don't have a clue how!! So, whose butt do I have to kiss to get this thing to work on the G2? Thanks!!!!
I dunno I kinda felt silly using the Voice Mate and saying Hello Genie.
shaungregg said:
I dunno I kinda felt silly using the Voice Mate and saying Hello Genie.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I don't see using the feature all that much in public. But while I'm in my car or at home, would be nice. I do find "Okay Google Now" to be a tongue twister somehow. Try it.
toddnbrown said:
Yeah, I don't see using the feature all that much in public. But while I'm in my car or at home, would be nice. I do find "Okay Google Now" to be a tongue twister somehow. Try it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea it comes in handy I mean I've used Google Now with voice searching and dictated some texts while driving so yea it would be nice feature but those times are rare since I usually just have music going in car and rarely text or take calls when driving. Still I guess if my phone was always listening for my commands it could be cool to sit it up on a table near me while I'm doing whatever and tell it what to do.
Friends--
If you're like me, you've found the native 'ok google' prompt to be a much faster / more elegant solution on lollipop than the moto middleman.
We can disable the moto software and enable the google implementation, however we are never given the option for it to work while the screen is off (and unplugged). We know that the hardware is there, so I am assuming that there is a flag somewhere that we need to change.
I'm going to start exploring on my own, but anyone else who can help look / has ideas on where to look, i figured this thread could be a group development project on this.
Looking forward to this!
Anyone have a thought on where to start looking?
Sent from my XT1095 using Tapatalk
After disabling Moto Voice, go to the Google Settings app -> Search & Now -> Voice -> "Ok Google" Detection.
There you can set "Ok Google" to respond then the device is locked.
tobeannouncd said:
After disabling Moto Voice, go to the Google Settings app -> Search & Now -> Voice -> "Ok Google" Detection.
There you can set "Ok Google" to respond then the device is locked.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks this works better then the Native Moto App
I still believe it won't work with the screen off and unplugged!!!!
Its possible.
Sent from my XT1095 using XDA Free mobile app
Selected that and still doesn't work with screen off
Sent from my XT1095
tjarvis said:
Selected that and still doesn't work with screen off
Sent from my XT1095
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry, you have to hit the power button first and then it'll work. I forgot about that and couldn't test at the time I posted.
Sent from my XT1095 using XDA Free mobile app
Yes. So this is exactly my point, and exactly what I'm trying to figure out
Sent from my XT1095 using Tapatalk
It's terrible and unfair! Motorola says they are giving the "Pure" Android Experience, no bloatware, just adding "Value Added" Software. Thank you Motorola, but give me a CHOICE! If you are FORCING your software on me, you are no better than Verizon!
This phone HAS the Instant On Hardware, and Lollipop Fully supports it. Again, thank you Motorola for your enhancements to Google Now (for those that like them). BUT for those of us that that don't, crippling Android Functionality is NOT the answer!!!
Give it back!!!
Cyber-Anna said:
It's terrible and unfair! Motorola says they are giving the "Pure" Android Experience, no bloatware, just adding "Value Added" Software. Thank you Motorola, but give me a CHOICE! If you are FORCING your software on me, you are no better than Verizon!
This phone HAS the Instant On Hardware, and Lollipop Fully supports it. Again, thank you Motorola for your enhancements to Google Now (for those that like them). BUT for those of us that that don't, crippling Android Functionality is NOT the answer!!!
Give it back!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Then get a different phone that has the hardware....stop your crying.
bongostl said:
Friends--
If you're like me, you've found the native 'ok google' prompt to be a much faster / more elegant solution on lollipop than the moto middleman.
We can disable the moto software and enable the google implementation, however we are never given the option for it to work while the screen is off (and unplugged). We know that the hardware is there, so I am assuming that there is a flag somewhere that we need to change.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I look forward to your findings. Being able to use Ok Google from the screen off state -while- unplugged would be nice to have. I'd bet dollar to doughnuts that moto disabled the necessary flag in order to allow their Voice middleware to function properly - without giving it the ability to set it back when Voice is disabled.
I think I've read something somewhere about flag 199? It's likely I'm mistaken though.
Good luck!
matt99017d said:
Then get a different phone that has the hardware....stop your crying.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you were as smart as your uncalled for, snide comment, you would KNOW it DOES have the hardware!
Cyber-Anna said:
If you were as smart as your uncalled for, snide comment, you would KNOW it DOES have the hardware!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I realize that it does have the hardware....that is proprietary to Motorola. I was suggesting that you find a different phone that suits your needs.
Your right, it was uncalled for. Just as much as your baby rant.
So, back to being helpful. Have you tried tasker at all? I know there is a way with xposed and tasker, but we don't have xposed as of yet...
Cyber-Anna said:
It's terrible and unfair! Motorola says they are giving the "Pure" Android Experience, no bloatware, just adding "Value Added" Software. Thank you Motorola, but give me a CHOICE! If you are FORCING your software on me, you are no better than Verizon!
This phone HAS the Instant On Hardware, and Lollipop Fully supports it. Again, thank you Motorola for your enhancements to Google Now (for those that like them). BUT for those of us that that don't, crippling Android Functionality is NOT the answer!!!
Give it back!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The hardware in the Moto X 2014 was designed to work with Motorola's implementation of screen-off voice recognition. Unfortunately the phone came out just a little too early to have the "standard" Google implementation since phones supporting that did not start coming out until ~1 month later.
It's not that easy
The X8 processing core in this device comes with a Natural Language Computing Processor NLCP core built in, which is a proprietary low power implementation. Therefore, the software portion that handles the output from the core is custom made by Motorola, and is not something that you find in the Android source tree, because a low power LCP core like the X8 never existed before. Similarly, the 'Ok Google' implementation is Google's proprietary implementation, part of the Google Suite of Applications, only to be installed as add-ons on devices that are compatible with 'Android Compatibility Definition Document'. The apps provided by Google usually do not undergo any OEM customizations.
To conclude, it's not as easy as enabling/ disabling a flag in the Android source to link to proprietary implementations from different vendors together.
P.S - Google's 'Ok Google' may work from from all the screens including a secure lock screen, but it cannot leverage the low power LCP core. This will impact your battery life !!!
trrubicon06 said:
Its possible.
Sent from my XT1095 using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah got it to work yesterday (with the screen off) for about 2 hours. Then it started not to work at all. Went back to Moto native app and its hit and miss with the app. hopefully it get fix cause its pretty annoying that the reason why i got this phone is because of this feature.
Not only the response is slower and unstable but it is limited to a single person..
Native ok google never fails... Its quicker.. And allows my girlfriend to give commands to the phone on the car along with me...
This thread has a simple tasker profile to do this. http://www.reddit.com/r/Android/comments/1rfqsj/psa_note_3_has_always_listening_out_of_the_box/
That doesn't help me, since I would like the option to use both at the same time. What chip is the nexus 6 using, I thought they were close. Both TI dsps right? Would it be possible to trick now into thinking it is on a Nexus 6?
ajanu said:
This thread has a simple tasker profile to do this. http://www.reddit.com/r/Android/comments/1rfqsj/psa_note_3_has_always_listening_out_of_the_box/
That doesn't help me, since I would like the option to use both at the same time. What chip is the nexus 6 using, I thought they were close. Both TI dsps right? Would it be possible to trick now into thinking it is on a Nexus 6?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its the exact same chip. We should be able to have that feature working on ours as well. We'd have a better chance if we reach out to Motorola to make it possible. Just like switching on the ambient display, they should let us chose between google now or moto voice!
Hey guys, as you might know, the "OK Google" hotword detection is not able to be used when the screen is off. I thought this was odd given the sheer amount of sensors packed in the Mate 9, so I wanted to see if I could find a workaround. And find a workaround I did! Best of all, it does not require root and does not drain any extra battery as it takes advantage of one of Huawei's native EMUI features
I'll post a tutorial on the XDA Portal so keep a look out for it!
edit: tutorial is live! https://www.xda-developers.com/enab...ord-detection-on-huawei-honor-phones-no-root/
MishaalRahman said:
Hey guys, as you might know, the "OK Google" hotword detection is not able to be used when the screen is off. I thought this was odd given the sheer amount of sensors packed in the Mate 9, so I wanted to see if I could find a workaround. And find a workaround I did! Best of all, it does not require root and does not drain any extra battery as it takes advantage of one of Huawei's native EMUI features
I'll post a tutorial on the XDA Portal so keep a look out for it!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is awesome news! Will you also link us here too? It'll be easier for me personally to follow since I'll now have this in my "participated" list.
jonathan3579 said:
This is awesome news! Will you also link us here too? It'll be easier for me personally to follow since I'll now have this in my "participated" list.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll try to remember to do that. The tutorial is written, I just need to decide when is the best time to publish it!
No rush lol
It's like you are writing a script for a movie, coming soon
Now is as good a time as any. It's sunday evening in Europe and late morning in the US. So you will get many readers. You will loose Asia however.
I have been using OK EMY -> OK GOOGLE.
Hope there's a better way.
Nikorasu said:
I have been using OK EMY -> OK GOOGLE.
Hope there's a better way.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you describe how you're doing it? I want to see if what I'm doing is different
Subscribed and waiting
MishaalRahman said:
Can you describe how you're doing it? I want to see if what I'm doing is different
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure, I hope you have a better method.
Settings-> Smart Assistance -> Voice control-> Voice Wakup
Enable it and train your voice.
Google Search-> Settings-> Voice-> OK google detection-> Enable From any screen
Train Voice model.
The method doesn't work when phone is locked but I have it Smart unlocked with my Fitbit.
Nikorasu said:
Sure, I hope you have a better method.
Settings-> Smart Assistance -> Voice control-> Voice Wakup
Enable it and train your voice.
Google Search-> Settings-> Voice-> OK google detection-> Enable From any screen
Train Voice model.
The method doesn't work when phone is locked but I have it Smart unlocked with my Fitbit.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So you're saying you speak twice? First to wake the phone with "OK emy" and then when it wakes you say "OK Google"?
MishaalRahman said:
So you're saying you speak twice? First to wake the phone with "OK emy" and then when it wakes you say "OK Google"?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, that's right.
Nikorasu said:
Yes, that's right.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ah, okay. My method only requires you to speak once.
MishaalRahman said:
Ah, okay. My method only requires you to speak once.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
:good:
@MishaalRahman Does your method involve using OpenMic+ for Google Now?
Sent from my MHA-L29 using Tapatalk
MaTiCeK- said:
@MishaalRahman Does your method involve using OpenMic+ for Google Now?
Sent from my MHA-L29 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No. OpenMic+ stopped working awhile back because Google told them to stop. Plus using OpenMic+ leads to excessive battery drain.
Great, now you really got me interested! When are you planning to post it?
Sent from my MHA-L29 using Tapatalk
MaTiCeK- said:
Great, now you really got me interested! When are you planning to post it?
Sent from my MHA-L29 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sometime this week, depending on when news is slow. Probably won't be tomorrow, though.
Ahh... Anyway I can persuade you to explain it to me via personal message? ?
Sent from my MHA-L29 using Tapatalk
Can you please post it now. I don't really get the point of waiting. News around here is very slow already as it is
MishaalRahman said:
Hey guys, as you might know, the "OK Google" hotword detection is not able to be used when the screen is off. I thought this was odd given the sheer amount of sensors packed in the Mate 9, so I wanted to see if I could find a workaround. And find a workaround I did! Best of all, it does not require root and does not drain any extra battery as it takes advantage of one of Huawei's native EMUI features
I'll post a tutorial on the XDA Portal so keep a look out for it!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is there any way u can come up with a work around for GV on this phone while using the stock dialer and the GV app? I'd be a god of u could. Great work tho okay Google detection is so sweet!!