Hi all after wiping my nook and starting again I've had quite significant battery issues. I've now followed the general advice out there and removed as much as possible etc so far so good but according to cpu spy and nofrills cpu it's still using 600mhz and 800mhz despite me using nofrills to lock it to 300. Anyone any ideas on why it isn't working? It shows the success popup but just doesn't mean actually stop the nook using the higher speeds.
Sent from my HTC One X+ using Tapatalk
So to clarify when I change cpu settings with no frills cpu it says success etc and applies on boot too but cpu spy shows its still using higher cpu values outside of the range I set.
Sent from my HTC One X+ using Tapatalk
Related
So I was trying to mess around with CPU profiles and I noticed that the low end of the CPU is clocked at 1GHz. If I lower it with Rom Toolbox, it just goes right back up after I leave the menu. the profiles won't stick, governors don't make a difference, and I'm a little confused.
Can someone shed some light on this for me?
I thought the lowest speed was 384 MHz? Install CPU Spy and check what it says.
It is 384MHz. The lower frequency change because of project butter that make the cpu run at a higher frequency when you touch the screen.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
Dont you need a custom kernal in order to change the clock speeds?
sent via xda premium with nexus 7
No, we can already change it but it won't stick since it has its own frequency management.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
Is this somewhat similar to perflocker in HTC devices? It had to be disabled to change any cpu settings AT ALL with the stock kernel.
hervelo said:
No, we can already change it but it won't stick since it has its own frequency management.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is why..
sent via xda premium with nexus 7
ed10000 said:
I thought the lowest speed was 384 MHz? Install CPU Spy and check what it says.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're right. I guess it just has its own profile to set at 1GHz when the screen is on, because the CPU Spy showed it in Deep Sleep/384Mhz for the majority of the night.
test1
Hello guys,
I'm here to ask for all of your opinions about the cpu Profiles, frequencies and governor.
For screen on I'm currently using 1200mHz on performance, I would like to know if it would save more battery by using on demand governor.
Some months ago I had a discussion with few xda members about this subject. But that was on aurora v4. Now I'm currently on v5 u17. Let me know your opinion. Thanks
Sent from my U8800 using xda app-developers app
To be honest, I've never experienced any benefits of setting cpu profiles for screen on, screen off etc. Your phone will work much more smoothly if you stick as close to the defaults as possible.
I don't use profiles. My min is 245 and max 1200, using on demand governor.
For a while I experimented with profiles, and had bad lag when unlocking the phone, and terrible battery use when screen on.
Independent of profiles, your governor will put your phone into deep sleep when the screen is off anyway.
Do a search for "race to idle" this explains in more detail the benefits of using ondemand as opposed to other governors in terms of battery use etc.
IMHO, Android as a platform would be far better served if people stuck close to the default settings and cpu profiles. Most of the time, any negligible benefits are just placebo.
Sent from my U8800 using xda app-developers app
So according to the race to idle running with performance governor saves battery
Sent from my U8800 using xda app-developers app
In theory yes, but if your cpu is always running at max frequency, ie even when doing nothing, then no.
I have done tests, and my battery always lasts longer using ondemand as opposed to performance, or other governors.
Sent from my U8800 using xda app-developers app
Use interactive/bfq that's the best in my opinion
Sent from my U8800-51 using xda premium
I have nexus 7 3G 32gb with trinity kernel,stock ROM.And i have question how do i overclock GPU?
Use Trinity kernel toolbox. It has the option to set the speed of the GPU and adjust the CPU voltages
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda app-developers app
winged mantis said:
Use Trinity kernel toolbox. It has the option to set the speed of the GPU and adjust the CPU voltages
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can my GPU burn or something like that?Or high GPU frequency will cause only reboot?
I've read that the max recommended GPU speed is 484.Going much higher the battery will drain too much and will get hot. If you set the speed to high it will become unstable and usually reboot. It will reboot and rest default speeds long before it will have time to melt. Just don't use your over clock settings to be set on boot
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda app-developers app
FatalaS said:
I have nexus 7 3G 32gb with trinity kernel,stock ROM.And i have question how do i overclock GPU?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1. easiest way, use the trinity kernel toolbox and adjust the gpu slider up or down.
2. or manually go to /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/gpu_oc/ with a root file explorer(like root explorer) and manually edit the variable and save it.
yes, it can get very hot if overclocking the gpu. especially when playing cpu intensive games. worst thing is youll reboot if things go haywire.
Excessive voltage and heat can easily fry a CPU/GPU and other motherboard components, so be careful.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk HD
Ive been getting smoother results underclocking the G2 at either 1.7 or 1.9 and knock on seems more quick to response, but when I tried video recording the 60 fps isn't smooth when you are clocked at the regular speed.. beware...I ran a benchmark on quadrant standard and got 17,250 constantly so it is underclocked per core... I want to hear your opinion on this and do you plan to underclock or already are. I feel like the ability to be more smooth within the UI helps a lot more now..let me know your thoughts!
bencozzy said:
From using trickster mod and setcpu to underclock they only underclock cpu0 the other three still use the full frequency range.
What app are you using?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No frills CPU control :0
At 1.9 my Antutu was the same add the One and oddly the graphics test dropped 15-20 frames even though we are not under clocking the GPU.
Sent from my VS980 4G using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
That's really odd tbh o.o did you try quadrent as well? :0
jrgilbert79 said:
At 1.9 my Antutu was the same add the One and oddly the graphics test dropped 15-20 frames even though we are not under clocking the GPU.
Sent from my VS980 4G using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got way higher even at 1.7ghz :0
jrgilbert79 said:
At 1.9 my Antutu was the same add the One and oddly the graphics test dropped 15-20 frames even though we are not under clocking the GPU.
Sent from my VS980 4G using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
HeXaLox said:
I got way higher even at 1.7ghz :0
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're saying that by underclocking, you're getting a smoother UI but lower benchmarks?
No i got a higher benchmark than the guy who replied on my post. I did get a smoother UI and everything is less laggy. Ill post a pic of 2.3ghz idk if its actually at 1.7ghz or 2.3ghz ill do another test
whittikins said:
You're saying that by underclocking, you're getting a smoother UI but lower benchmarks?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All this is true. Just tried. It might be a TINY bit slower ui THOUGH
Sent from my LG-D800 using Tapatalk 4
What settings did toy use? Deadline? Noop? Interactive gov?
Sent from my VS980 4G using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
I am using the app called No-frills CPU Control and for 1.7ghz I am using row and Ondemand as the I/O governor and same settings for the regular clock as well..
jrgilbert79 said:
What settings did toy use? Deadline? Noop? Interactive gov?
Sent from my VS980 4G using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Underclocked at 1.7ghz first then regular clock at 2.27ghz
jrgilbert79 said:
What settings did toy use? Deadline? Noop? Interactive gov?
Sent from my VS980 4G using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am tending to believe that the regular clock speed is actually overclocked...just like how the galaxy s4 is overclocked 200mhz more than normal...however I could be wrong..
If you really want to see if this odd issue is actually happening download an app called Multicore CPU Control (the only app of its kind that seems to work with the LG G2). I use this to save battery by turning off all but one core, but it allows you full control over all your cores.
Download it, create a profile, and set each core to what you want. I had to save the profile first, then go back in to edit the latter 3 cores' frequencies.
I would suggest setting the min and max to the same and choosing Performance for the governor. Use a different app to set the scheduler.
Be sure to have something like Kernel Tuner to ensure that all your cores are running as you intended. If not, go back into Multicore CPU Control and re-save your profile again.
Would love to hear the results afterwards!
I used Multicore CPU Control.
The only way to set clock to CPU 1,2,3 is let them always active. If I leave dynamic for these cores, they still go up to 2,26 GHZ. I think this the reason why HeXaLox have a little decrement when underclock because it only did for one core.
Just curious what everybody is setting their cpu minimum frequencies at. I am not too concerned with battery life so I was thinking of setting mine a little higher to keep everything as smooth as possible. Is there a risk to raising the minimum frequency?
Sent from my VS980 4G using xda app-developers app
pwshadow said:
Just curious what everybody is setting their cpu minimum frequencies at. I am not too concerned with battery life so I was thinking of setting mine a little higher to keep everything as smooth as possible. Is there a risk to raising the minimum frequency?
Sent from my VS980 4G using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think you would benefit more from choosing another governor instead Try intellidemand or interactive := Both of these should be better than ondemand
pwshadow said:
Just curious what everybody is setting their cpu minimum frequencies at. I am not too concerned with battery life so I was thinking of setting mine a little higher to keep everything as smooth as possible. Is there a risk to raising the minimum frequency?
Sent from my VS980 4G using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i have mine set at 300000 so when my phone goes into deep sleep it's using little cpu power, but i also have interactive governor so that when i turn the screen on there's no delay and the kernel and cpu have what they need to be snappy.
this thread tells you all you need to know about governors and i/o schedulers.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1663809