LG G2s currently number #1 and #9 in antutu benchmarks - G2 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting

How in the world are these d802s putting up 37000+ benchmarks scores in antutu? The fastest I have gotten is about 34000 on Mahdi ROM. To be number 1 is really great I wonder what are they doing to push out that extra juice. To be just as powerful as the Note 3 is impressive.
Sent from my G2 using Tapatalk

its the kernels
they overclock the snapdragon 800.

Thermal mitigation. Put your phone in the freezer (or outside) for half an hour and run the test. There's all kinds of things you can do to increase the score. Haven't seen a 40k score yet...
Sent from my VS980 4G using xda app-developers app

That's what you call power behind tamed dragon... Dorimax Kernel gives me 37900+ antutu score. No fridge trick.

lol whats this fridge trick

abubakrg said:
lol whats this fridge trick
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Usually the benchmark heats up the device enough to start thermal throttling part way through. Throw it in the fridge to chill it down enough that it wont throttle down.

actually its stock unovercocked that are kicking ass.
I had 36000.
those svores are nuthing but scores though, it doesnt translate to added advantage other then score
Sent from my LG-D802 using xda app-developers app

I didn't know about any of this. Thanks for all the input
Sent from my G2 using Tapatalk

ffejy462 said:
Thermal mitigation. Put your phone in the freezer (or outside) for half an hour and run the test. There's all kinds of things you can do to increase the score. Haven't seen a 40k score yet...
Sent from my VS980 4G using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://www.dorimanx.com/images/This-is-DORIIII!!!.png

Damnnnnnn lol
Sent from my G2 using Tapatalk

Related

Usa v6 speed mod

dsexton702 said:
These are some tweaks created by dsexton702 that offer you a generous performance boost in I/O and giving you the newest fugu mod 3.1. This is a fast growing tweak and needs to be shared with everyone who can benefit from it
download the U.S.A.Sv6
OP: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1236779
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It does work on our phones as I'm using right know...just thought I pass on the good work of these devs...
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium
What is it like V6SuperCharger?
Sent from my PG06100 using XDA App
It speeds up and opyimuzes androids Input and output....its just version6 of the mod.....thy have a new version but I haven't tried yet..I've used this on my HTC hd2 and mytouch 4g and know my shift .....
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium
Idk if I posted in right section if not can mod move this please to right one....
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium
v6 supercharger is useless IMO. Tweak your data setting in ##DATA# with a sense rom and use a good kernel like super scary stable.
VICODAN said:
v6 supercharger is useless IMO. Tweak your data setting in ##DATA# with a sense rom and use a good kernel like super scary stable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You see I did tweak my ##DATA# setting and use Scarykernel on the latest CM7 nightlies. There's a noticable improvement using V6Supercharger over without on my device.
Sent from my PG06100 using XDA App
Same here I have found a noticable speed also in quadrent score also....
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium
bigfdaddy said:
Same here I have found a noticable speed also in quadrent score also....
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What's your antutu score with Scary kernel on toasty at 1900mhz?
Here the score Wich includes v6 mod,scary govener,1900mhz over clock,and SD booster...
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium
bigfdaddy said:
Here the score Wich includes v6 mod,scary govener,1900mhz over clock,and SD booster...
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Proof that this **** is useless:
Scarystable compcache disabled:
RAM 612
CPU integer 1221
CPU float-point 518
2d graphics 276
3d graphics 793
database io 535
sdcard write 9.9MB/s 99
sdcard read 17.5 MB/s 175
total score: 4229
Linpack single thread score = 62.33 MFLOPS, Time 1.35 Seconds, Norm Res 5.68, Precision 2.22044604...
Linpack multi thread score = 57.961 MFLOPS, Time 2.91 seconds Norm Res, 3.24, Precision 2.22044604...
P.S. You should use Toasty gov for benchmarking and run benchmarks on a fresh boot and close as many apps as possible.
BTW:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1296614
---------- Post added at 01:51 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:54 AM ----------
Benchmark scores do not prove actual real life performance...
They are just numbers ppl like to boast about and doesn't mean your phone is any faster/more responsive with a higher score.
And. Any scores wether antutu/quadrant/or whatever can be faked.
Sent from my Supreme Shift on Wires!
notsointeresting said:
Benchmark scores do not prove actual real life performance...
They are just numbers ppl like to boast about and doesn't mean your phone is any faster/more responsive with a higher score.
And. Any scores wether antutu/quadrant/or whatever can be faked.
Sent from my Supreme Shift on Wires!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wouldn't be wasting my breath and posting fake benchmark scores if I didn't believe it and try this mod.
The only difference I noticed was LPP loading a little bit faster on startup.
VICODAN said:
I wouldn't be wasting my breath and posting fake benchmark scores if I didn't believe it and try this mod.
The only difference I noticed was LPP loading a little bit faster on startup.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well every little bit counts doesn't it?.....ty for trying it tho and posting ya score....
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium
bigfdaddy said:
Well every little bit counts doesn't it?.....ty for trying it tho and posting ya score....
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Np.. just saying everytime I flash a nightly I have to do this.. it's annoying as hell where as I just flash ScaryStable once with each nightly flash and I'm good to go and I notice a HUGE difference in performance.
For what it's worth, the V6 Supercharger (currently running the update9 beta) provides an optimal RAM manager which eliminated my habit of installing AutoKiller w/ every ROM. Since running the Supercharger script, I've consistently ran w/ 175-180MB in free RAM w/ no app FC's. That alone is worth using this mod in my book.
Ty 4 trying.....tying to expand this to more people and let them know about it.I.think its worth all the hype and attention I can give it.
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium

Disadvantages of overclocking and why you shouldn't

1. You could literally burn out your processor making your phone unusable at all (think of RROD for phones)
2. If it crashes while writing sd or nand you could loose data such as apps, texts from your boss, videos of your baby's first steps, pictures of your girlfriend and contacts of coworkers
3. Your phone could become less tolerant of workload and have random reboots even on stock RFS at 1ghz
4. A lot more such as battery overheating and possible exploding
5. IT IS A PHONE WITH NO FANS!
NEVER GO ABOVE 1.3 GHZ OR AT BEST STAY ON 1.0 GHZ (OR 1.2) LIKE SAMSUNG PUTS YOU ON DEFAULT (FOR A REASON)...
Please share your opinion of overclocking but don't be mean to others. There arrested some benefits but I say stay under 1.3
Reading:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overclocking
http://www.dgweb.ca/g3/part3.html
http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/258766-29-advantages-overclocking-disadvantages
IBTL
/me sits back and waits for trolls
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
cordell12 said:
IBFL
/me sits back and waits for trolls
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In before ___? What is the L?
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
I have run 1.3 solidly since i rooted, no bad sectors or anything. I do understand there are recommended levels but is there any indicator one can use to notice degradation?
Sectors is the nand memory, not the processor. I am just saying the risks of it. Not saying that you shouldn't, just the risks.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
marcusant said:
In before ___? What is the L?
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lock
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
marcusant said:
In before ___? What is the L?
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
"L" = Lock ( in before lock )
TexasEpic4G said:
"L" = Lock ( in before lock )
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I saw. I really don't see why this would be locked.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
I think it all depends on your surroundings, in a hot car I underclock and it still gets hot, outside or in a cold room I push it to 1.4ghz and it only gets warm. Also overclocking on the charger is probably a bad idea too. Just my 2 cents
Sent from my SPH-D700 using xda premium
I only overclock occasionally for bragging when a friend gets a fancy new phone or something.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Absolutely agree Marcusant. The only people I see random rebooting after release are OC'ing. My phone is superfast at 1000 Mhz and Legendary plus it barely does 1200 anyway so why blow it up?
Also aren't there galaxy s variants that come overclocked at 1.2ghz? Plus the moment was overclocked too. So I guess samsung is fine with overclocking.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using xda premium
marcusant said:
I saw. I really don't see why this would be locked.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wasn't suggesting this was gonna get locked - just answering your question about what "L" in IBFL meant ....... I am in agreement about OverClocking ( and UnderVolting ) because some phones ( mine included ) don't handle OC/UV very well
xopher.hunter said:
Also isn't there galaxy s variants that come overclocked at 1.2ghz? Plus the moment was overclocked too. So I guess samsung is fine with overclocking yes?
Sent from my SPH-D700 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I reallly doubt Samsung would go very high but all I know is that the moment had some major problems...
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
marcusant said:
I reallly doubt Samsung would go very high but all I know is that the moment had some major problems...
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The moment did have a major problem: its arm11 processor
Sent from my SPH-D700 using xda premium
I don't OC. Not because of the reasons mentioned but it's just not a big deal to me.
xopher.hunter said:
Also aren't there galaxy s variants that come overclocked at 1.2ghz? Plus the moment was overclocked too. So I guess samsung is fine with overclocking.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
exactly. the infuse uses same chipset but clocked at 1.2ghz factory.
Other than for bragging rights, overclocking a phone(especially on the epic) is almost pointless.
Its not like on a PC where you can overclock a CPU 50-100% of its original clocks to yield performance. A .3ghz overclock really get you nothing in the real world.
A year ago overclocking was marginal at best because no apps were able to utilize our phones processor but now with dual cores all around us it will be the only way we can keep up. Don't believe me? Try playing shadowgun at 1.0ghz
Sent from my SPH-D700 using xda premium
shabbypenguin said:
exactly. the infuse uses same chipset but clocked at 1.2ghz factory.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I never said 1.2 was bad. I said above 1.3
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App

Quadrant finally updated.. post your scores

This is still laughable to me. Still, quadrant was updated to work well with ICS. This is my score with cm7 gingerbread @1.440 ghz. Why am I above a galaxy nexus? Hmm.. :trollface:
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
RushAOZ said:
This is still laughable to me. Still, quadrant was updated to work well with ICS. This is my score with cm7 gingerbread @1.440 ghz. Why am I above a galaxy nexus? Hmm.. :trollface:
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hahaha your funny here's my galaxy nexus. Try to beat that lol stock rooted with 13.5ghz over clock
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
My t-prime got 4500
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Esteway.619 said:
Hahaha your funny here's my galaxy nexus. Try to beat that lol stock rooted with 13.5ghz over clock
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha what I meant to say is, why am I above a gnex? Oh yea, this benchmark is FLAWED!! lol
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
RushAOZ said:
Haha what I meant to say is, why am I above a gnex? Oh yea, this benchmark is FLAWED!! lol
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hahaha
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
My result with CM9 v2.1, T132-ICS-CM9 Kernel and CPU set to 200-1000 MHz, ondemand: 2257.
Of course the NS can't mess with an GN, but i'm still impressed how much performance you can gain with custom-roms and -kernels.
I'm running gingerbread deck and the matrix kernel with an overclock to 1.2...(not live oc) and got a score of sound 2966. Hopefully the official 4G build gets ics performance up a little more. I find it hard to believe my device on GB out preforms a galaxy nexus by so much...
Lol nice update like how they slapped a galaxy tab score with io hack at top to make this crap look legit.
At least now you can distinguish actual hardware scores from IO.and supports dualcore.
about the only legit thing to go by in this benchmark is the CPU
anyways enough *****ing
here is my score without any io minpluation
on Eugen's speedy 7 1.44/performance/SIO/65FPS refresh
How are you guys viewing your results? Mine tells me that the next update will include the result browser due to different scores in this version?
you have to except the new shady test result message at the end of the test
im sorry, i really couldnt resist. the sight of this thread to me was like a cat sensing catnip
a cm9 kang with trinity t144, at 1.44ghz
Use to get 3000... sad times....
Nexus S (GSM i9020a)
CM9 Kang (Build 6 of 2.1)
Eugene's Kernel (Speedy-7)
OC 800/100 (conservative)
demo23019 said:
Lol nice update like how they slapped a galaxy tab score with io hack at top to make this crap look legit.
even gpu score is whacked considering GN has same sgx540 with a higher clock
yet the stock NS GPU scores higher
At least now you can distinguish actual hardware scores from IO.and supports dualcore.
about the only legit thing to go by in this benchmark is the CPU
anyways enough *****ing
here is my score without any io minpluation
on Eugen's speedy 7 1.44/performance/SIO/65FPS refresh
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you forget the galaxy nexus has a lot more pixels to push.....
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
Rem3Dy said:
you forget the galaxy nexus has a lot more pixels to push.....
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Very true. More than 2.5 times the Res.
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
The power vr540 is a beast.
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
Sgx540*
Sorry, I'm drunk.
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
Rem3Dy said:
you forget the galaxy nexus has a lot more pixels to push.....
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup you're right forgot about that
What the heck? I am getting better scores with Trintity(880/220, conservative) than SG's kernel(1100/200, performance).
SG's kernel
Trintity
I know that benchmark is nothing but still it is weird.
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk
ljordan2 said:
What the heck? I am getting better scores with Trintity(880/220, conservative) than SG's kernel(1100/200, performance).
SG's kernel
View attachment 901627
Trintity
View attachment 901628
I know that benchmark is nothing but still it is weird.
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So did I, never could determine why...
ljordan2 said:
What the heck? I am getting better scores with Trintity(880/220, conservative) than SG's kernel(1100/200, performance).
SG's kernel
View attachment 901627
Trintity
View attachment 901628
I know that benchmark is nothing but still it is weird.
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
kooskoos1814 said:
So did I, never could determine why...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
dont let the 880mhz in trinity teuv fool you, its as fast as many 1.2ghz kernels.

Antutu Benchmark on S3

Hi Guys,
i try to run antutu on my S3 sadly i always got lowes score. and one thing i found out my S3 is only tri-core according to antutu software.
how should i check if this is true?
TIA
spyro0610 said:
Hi Guys,
i try to run antutu on my S3 sadly i always got lowes score. and one thing i found out my S3 is only tri-core according to antutu software.
how should i check if this is true?
TIA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
holy hell what has happened here? I hope a dev hops over here quickly never seen such a thing.
LiquidNarwhal said:
holy hell what has happened here? I hope a dev hops over here quickly never seen such a thing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
can you try to your S3?
can bring my device to customer service for them to check?
Mine says triple to !
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Report this to the antutu developer. It's an report problem. By the why, but what kind of scores are you getting?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
currydude said:
Report this to the antutu developer. It's an report problem. By the why, but what kind of scores are you getting?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
before i always got 8000 +
now i try again
Quadrant and antutu
find attach file. is this accetable?
TIA
Why do people just want to number crunch benchmarks? They really mean nothing.... The best benchmark test is how it works in real life, is the OS smooth, do the apps work well on it, any lag at all... That is the best benchmark. Christ, my old HTC desire nearly had the same scores as the stock sensation according to BM scores, in real life however is was lagging like a pig stuck in mud. Lol
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
There is no need to check if its true because its not.
Its probably just detected that one of the cores was turned off at the time.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
spyro0610 said:
before i always got 8000 +
now i try again
Quadrant and antutu
find attach file. is this accetable?
TIA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quadrant is normal. Antutu definitely looks too low. Are you using anything like setcpu or any power saving apps?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Are you triple core guys using siyah kernel? I use System Panel to monitor my phone and it only shows three active cores. Till now I didn't put much into it though, thinking that it's just because there wasn't enough load to start the fourth core. But maybe there is an issue after all?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
re
hello
well i used to have very random scores varying from 5000 to 12000
yesterday i ran the test and got 12064 but when checking it says dual-core armv7 processor(vf9v3, neon)
also i have another question regarding the processor, shouldnt it be arm v9 ???

[Q] please someone help me, my Nexus for still stuck in 130. on linpack

I don't know if something with the kerner so I tried to install a new kernel, I've been trying many kernels and still the problem... Someone can help me?
No one care about it?
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda premium
Sr.Keony said:
No one care about it?
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We really don't. Benchmarks mean nothing.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda premium
U need to liquid cool the CPU to get higher scores
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
munchy_cool said:
U need to liquid cool the CPU to get higher scores
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol great also on franco I am only getting a max of 170 with linpak so your 150 is fine
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
Sr.Keony said:
I don't know if something with the kerner so I tried to install a new kernel, I've been trying many kernels and still the problem... Someone can help me?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I suggest chainfire method. It's very effective in trouble shooting benchmark performance.
However, if you put any trust in Quadrant scores you could use them to prove that dancing naked for 5 minutes in your garden affects device performance
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I get 220+ on average stock.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
240 all day here
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
thread is about on how to improve his imaginary benchmark scores that mean nothing because its all about real time performance.
phone feels buttery without any lag? thats good enough for me, i dont need a benchmark to prove that my phone runs faster.
this thread isnt about bragging benchmark results that absolutely mean nothing.
Thanks all of you guys for the advices
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda premium
Never received a linpak score below 380 crew checking in
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
I get 967 MFLOPS in multicore Mode.
https://plus.google.com/u/0/107558323179602517601/posts/GUsj9wBDwXZ

Categories

Resources