Hello all!
Strange "issue" - i don't know if this is an issue but yeah - i installed the KITKAT release that appeared about 20 hrs ago on the google website...
Now - Antutu score has dropped a lot!
Before 4.4, i hat stock 4.3 - 19000 score and last AOKP with franco kernel - 20600
NOW - with 4.4 it has dropped to 14639 !!!!!!!
kreindler said:
Hello all!
Strange "issue" - i don't know if this is an issue but yeah - i installed the KITKAT release that appeared about 20 hrs ago on the google website...
Now - Antutu score has dropped a lot!
Before 4.4, i hat stock 4.3 - 19000 score and last AOKP with franco kernel - 20600
NOW - with 4.4 it has dropped to 14639 !!!!!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wait antutu gets compatible with 4.4 kikat
Karo. said:
Wait antutu gets compatible with 4.4 kikat
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
already is, while i was on n5 port i got 16k witch is standard for stock, that 14k just confirm what i said in other threads, 4.4 is more laggy than 4.3(not laggy like it lags a lot, but sometimes u see some little lags where u dont see on 4.3)
1. Antutu has changed a lot since even 4.3.. Separate dalvik tests etc.. Scores may have changed
2. Google phone software always comes unoptimised.. No krait/bionic optimisation and also with dog slow dalvik/Java libraries.
Kernel and rom devs should have normal performance resumed shortly.. Hopefully.
meangreenie said:
1. Antutu has changed a lot since even 4.3.. Separate dalvik tests etc.. Scores may have changed
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not a valid argument - i've done all the tests today and yesterday- same antutu version
Furthermore- has anyone made similar before/after tests with other benchmark programs??
I dont know if it's placebo, but 4.4 seems at least that buttery as 4.3 to me....
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
Don't go on what antutu says it's the worsts bench mark use geek bench for CPU and gfx bench for gpu
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda premium
THEBANDIT420 said:
Don't go on what antutu says it's the worsts bench mark use geek bench for CPU and gfx bench for gpu
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
now why do you say that antutu is the worst? in reality, they are both just as bad. yes, geek bench is just as inaccurate.
So, do these results indicate any sort of actual real life increase or decrease in performance?
I apologise just would like for someone to clear this up for me.
No. It is well known that bench marks mean nothing. They are easily fooled into giving higher scores with laggier performance
Wayne Tech Nexus
yes and no.... benchmarks are irrelevant to a certain point. But overall - they offer a view on the performance - an s2 will get a lower score as an s3, or a nexus 4.. and that with cheating on benchmarks, i think the only one that was found was samsung... one more reason 4 me to hate them and their recycled plastic products
kreindler said:
yes and no.... benchmarks are irrelevant to a certain point. But overall - they offer a view on the performance - an s2 will get a lower score as an s3, or a nexus 4.. and that with cheating on benchmarks, i think the only one that was found was samsung... one more reason 4 me to hate them and their recycled plastic products
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You should be aware that the phone underclocks when reaches a certain temperature. Keep that in mind and re-do your benchmark. Put your phone somewhere cold, like granite, wait some minutes and do your benchmark.
Me too its just 15k in antutu.. And im getting some lags in games like FIFA 14 and a good battery drain it drains 7-10% in one night without use.
opssemnik said:
already is, while i was on n5 port i got 16k witch is standard for stock, that 14k just confirm what i said in other threads, 4.4 is more laggy than 4.3(not laggy like it lags a lot, but sometimes u see some little lags where u dont see on 4.3)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed! Felt the same when i started using.
Any issues yet?
The only issue im having is that when i increase the volume while playing music and try to slide the volume bar on the screen, it doesnt work.
EDIT: Runnin butter smooth after 2 restarts since the rom installation.
Just got 17,915 Antutu on stock 4.4, tested in performance mode. Seems normal to me; bring on the bionic and dalvik enhancements.
kreindler said:
Hello all!
Strange "issue" - i don't know if this is an issue but yeah - i installed the KITKAT release that appeared about 20 hrs ago on the google website...
Now - Antutu score has dropped a lot!
Before 4.4, i hat stock 4.3 - 19000 score and last AOKP with franco kernel - 20600
NOW - with 4.4 it has dropped to 14639 !!!!!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i tried antutu and got over 15k i will try again with ART
Flashed purity now... Will do antutu benchmark tomorrow! Fingers crossed)
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
kreindler said:
Hello all!
Strange "issue" - i don't know if this is an issue but yeah - i installed the KITKAT release that appeared about 20 hrs ago on the google website...
Now - Antutu score has dropped a lot!
Before 4.4, i hat stock 4.3 - 19000 score and last AOKP with franco kernel - 20600
NOW - with 4.4 it has dropped to 14639 !!!!!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Although i am new to nexus 4, ye i upgraded from nexus one just 1 week ago (nexus one lasted almost 4 years, what a dog !) i do have to say the kitkat update has made a significant negative impact in 3d games/applications.
The performance drop is obvious on say, minion rush. As i am a gamer in PCs for many years, since 1986, and a tv control news expert , i can easily feel the frames being near 25 and i can even tell if frames are down to 20 10 or 5.
I am pretty certain the frames in Minion Rush for example (heavier game i have atm in n4) have dropped at least 30% and i am pretty sure they were not way above 25 before kitkat. I estimate 10-15 fps max
Related
Stock 4.2.1 with franco's kernel: 1723
Stock 4.2.1 without franco's kernel: 1841
Now here comes the weird part...
CM10.1 4.2.1 with franco's kernel: 1243
What gives? What's with the sudden drop in the score? Is anybody else getting similar results? Is it because CM10.1 shuts off two of the cores? This comes as a surprise to me because I've been running CM10.1 for the past hour and it's noticeably smoother than the stock rom.
Silencer96 said:
Stock 4.2.1 with franco's kernel: 1723
Stock 4.2.1 without franco's kernel: 1841
Now here comes the weird part...
CM10.1 4.2.1 with franco's kernel: 1243
What gives? What's with the sudden drop in the score? Is anybody else getting similar results? Is it because CM10.1 shuts off two of the cores? This comes as a surprise to me because I've been running CM10.1 for the past hour and it's noticeably smoother than the stock rom.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So why care what worthless benchmarks say? Your phone - your experience. Screw what any benchmark app says mate. :thumbup:
Vangelis13 said:
So why care what worthless benchmarks say? Your phone - your experience. Screw what any benchmark app says mate. :thumbup:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I could care less about the benchmark itself. What worries me is whether or not CM10.1 shuts down two of my Nexus' four cores.
Silencer96 said:
I could care less about the benchmark itself. What worries me is whether or not CM10.1 shuts down two of my Nexus' four cores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Probably franco's kernel does that. Which one are you on?
P. S. Why does it matter if phone runs ok for your usage..?
Vangelis13 said:
Probably franco's kernel does that. Which one are you on?
P. S. Why does it matter if phone runs ok for your usage..?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
r72.
Also, because I paid top dollar to make the switch from my Galaxy S. If I really wanted functionality and nothing more, I would've just stuck with my Galaxy S.
Would you mind running an Antutu benchmark and telling me what you get? It could be an error on my side. thx
Silencer96 said:
r72.
Also, because I paid top dollar to make the switch from my Galaxy S. If I really wanted functionality and nothing more, I would've just stuck with my Galaxy S.
Would you mind running an Antutu benchmark and telling me what you get? It could be an error on my side. thx
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hm, can't do that, sorry. Last time I run a benchmark was more than a year ago, I hate them passionately. Particularly with the crappy job LG has done in the building of this phone, antutu is like the devil..
Isn't that r72 supposed to turn the cores off though? Try a different one?
Vangelis13 said:
Hm, can't do that, sorry. Last time I run a benchmark was more than a year ago, I hate them passionately. Particularly with the crappy hob LG has done in the building of this phone, antutu is like the devil..
Isn't that r72 supposed to turn the cores off though? Try a different one?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope, r72 introduced hot-plugging. Anyway, that definitely had nothing to do with the score seeing as to how I was running the same kernel on stock when I ran the test.
You got serious problems if you can't break 2000 on antutu. Because i can tell you at least one app that runs awfully slow for you, and thats antutu.
meangreenie said:
You got serious problems if you can't break 2000 on antutu. Because i can tell you at least one app that runs awfully slow for you, and thats antutu.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry, what?
meangreenie said:
You got serious problems if you can't break 2000 on antutu. Because i can tell you at least one app that runs awfully slow for you, and thats antutu.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
only those devices running bionic patched roms are going over 20000 in antutu, devices running the normal roms score a little less.
simms22 said:
only those devices running bionic patched roms are going over 20000 in antutu, devices running the normal roms score a little less.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah a little less, not 18000+ less though, lol
meangreenie said:
yeah a little less, not 18000+ less though, lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
oh, i see what you are saying. i think he just accidentally dropped a digit at the end of each score.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
Hey,
Just wondering if its only me, I've tried PA 4.3 JSS and JWR, really choppy and slow.
So i restored the JWR still continues super choppy, even simply going through the pages of the app drawer lags, Antutu gets me 14k results where previously on 4.2.2 i got 22k, on games like Real Racing 3 i notice much lower FPS than on 4.2.2,
I've tried with stock kernel and Franco, with small improvements with Franco but still barely unusable.
Is this situation shared with any of you using 4.3? Will it get any better?
Thanks.
Mottz said:
Hey,
Just wondering if its only me, I've tried PA 4.3 JSS and JWR, really choppy and slow.
So i restored the JWR still continues super choppy, even simply going through the pages of the app drawer lags, Antutu gets me 14k results where previously on 4.2.2 i got 22k, on games like Real Racing 3 i notice much lower FPS than on 4.2.2,
I've tried with stock kernel and Franco, with small improvements with Franco but still barely unusable.
Is this situation shared with any of you using 4.3? Will it get any better?
Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think you are the only one with this problem. I am on latest PA 3.96 and its super smooth.. Won't comment on games as I dont play much but performance,battery wise PA + franco's kernel rocks..
try clean wipe..(factory reset wipe all except internal )
Also it matters if you flash JWR kernel on a JSS rom you will face such issues,this might be a problem in your case. :good:
Its not the kernels mismatch, that I'm sure as I am aware many problems could be originated by that.
I notice the difference mostly in games since its one of the things I most use the phone for, although in the menus and general usage it still feels choppy and not smooth at all.
I have tried that, I have even restored the factory image and tried factory reset after that, all with no apparent result.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 4
Did you measure CPU clocks for some time too so you can see if it's something about the governor/etc?
Sent from my Nexus 4
wirapuru said:
Did you measure CPU clocks for some time too so you can see if it's something about the governor/etc?
Sent from my Nexus 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not sure how to do that but i tested Antutu and Real Racing 3 with Performance Governor @1.5Ghz and it still didn't cut it, i currently have the same Franco kernel settings i had on 4.2.2
Mottz said:
Hey,
Just wondering if its only me, I've tried PA 4.3 JSS and JWR, really choppy and slow.
So i restored the JWR still continues super choppy, even simply going through the pages of the app drawer lags, Antutu gets me 14k results where previously on 4.2.2 i got 22k, on games like Real Racing 3 i notice much lower FPS than on 4.2.2,
I've tried with stock kernel and Franco, with small improvements with Franco but still barely unusable.
Is this situation shared with any of you using 4.3? Will it get any better?
Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think something is wrong with your device, because I´m on AOSP build with Matrix kernel and I can reach easily 22k on Antutu with no tweaks, just installing ROM and kernel. About games, I have played some and I do´t have any lag or anything related.
As someone stated before, you should try to make a factory reset and try to install an AOSP version, because it has many commits and patches that JW doesn´t have.
Mottz said:
Not sure how to do that but i tested Antutu and Real Racing 3 with Performance Governor @1.5Ghz and it still didn't cut it, i currently have the same Franco kernel settings i had on 4.2.2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
By measure for some time I mean to use an app like CPU spy reborn ( https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.mirko.csr ) so it'll record CPU shifts and clock times during a reboot session. It's good to see if the governor is behaving normally, but since you won't have a reference from before I don't know if it'll be very useful.
Well, good luck with your problem, I hope you get it solved quickly. I'm a new N4 owner myself (barely 2 months) and don't much yet about the device.
Sent from my Nexus 4
I've noticed some games which do not run smoothly with 4.3, where they did with 4.2.2. I use unrooted stock, I don't benchmark because I prefer real-world usage.
I think the solution is to wait for app devs to update their software.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 4
I guess I'll try the aosp build,I've had it in the past but steered away from it due to the locks and also slow performance.
I'll try it and report back
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 4
If you have a dedexed rom try jszaq patch from the benchmark thread. It will give roms without bionic/krait optimisations those tweaks and also it will give a huge dalvik/java improvement.
I score 21000 antutu and 8000 quadrant with it on deodexed stock jwr rom at stock speeds.
I just bought my new Nexus 4 and i tested it and it has really low score in 3dmark! what is the problem...?
Reboot, run it when it's cool.
meangreenie said:
Reboot, run it when it's cool.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just did that. I bought it, turned it on, updated it to Android 4.3 rebooted it, and ran 3Dmark and this is the score! It was cool and no bacground apps were running. Is it slow because of android 4.3 maybe?
Echelonex said:
I just bought my new Nexus 4 and i tested it and it has really low score in 3dmark! what is the problem...?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Solution: stop running benchmarks.
mitchdickson said:
Solution: stop running benchmarks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The problem isnt the benchmark, it has almost the same gaming performance as my Sony ericsson Live With walkman overclocked to 1.6Ghz!
I played ExtremeG 2 on N64 emulator and game is almost choppy as on my LWW :/ Also i played Danmaku death, and sometimes Fps is better than my old LWW but sometimes its worse >__>
P.S. It looks like it throttled so the score was that low... But still for 10 mins of testing some games that run good on my 1Ghz phone to be able to make the Nexus go to throttle mode and it was baerly warm to the touch...And people say you need around 30mins of heavy gaming to make it throttle... I expected much more from this device. It looks like its custom kernel time.
Wow, now it scored in ice storm extreme almost the same as in ordinary ice storm test while throttling... Didn't know it was going to affect the performance so much...
All these benchmark tests are shiat!
Samsung know how to fake scores, LG and HTC also, the nexus and motorola are clean:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/7384/state-of-cheating-in-android-benchmarks
Anyway, try to play FIFA 14 on your Sony Ericsson Live....[dead], I don't think you could run this game and if so it never be smooth and fast as its on Nexus4.
I wanna share with you some benchmarks I did... with Antutu.
The winner is.... Samsung 4.3 ROM ! :angel:
Warning: the ART score with the 4.4 is not accurate; I had several gapps & gallery crashes while testing the GPU score... but look at the CPU and Dalvik score...
Comparison here:
COMPARISON IMAGE
nice info!
n0my said:
nice info!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It seems like GPU works better with the 4.3 samsung rom... but I don't think the score is cheated.... I noticed that Chrome, Facebook and everything involving pinch to zoom, pan, etc operations on some content, it's way smoother with the 4.3 sammy rom.
:victory:
I had different experience myself.
I have n7105 and was on sammy 4.1.2 that came with the phone.
No lags, the zoom in and out was lag free. very smooth.
Updated to CM 10.2 JB 4.3.1 and it gave severe lag problem on browser zoom in and scrolling.
Now on unofficial CM 11 Kitkat 4.4. Now its a lot better than the 4.3.1.
ART is kinda in an Alpha stage but... that said i't's performing wonderfully for me (except not compatibile apps). I think that actually antutu isn't accurate at benchmarking with ART but i've seen an enourmus improvement:good::good:
danyuhuh said:
ART is kinda in an Alpha stage but... that said i't's performing wonderfully for me (except not compatibile apps). I think that actually antutu isn't accurate at benchmarking with ART but i've seen an enourmus improvement:good::good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure... I don't trust antutu, I posted the comparison because lot of people ask about benchmarks on it!
I think it's a good news that they are working on making Android more efficient, so let's wait :victory:
What is the 'normal' Antutu benchmark value for stock 4.1.2?
Mine is only 16,412 really far from 20,000+ as shown in the OP's 4.1.2 ROM benchmark.
I am wondering if my low benchmark is because of the eMMC that just got replaced. The thing is that eMMC brickbug check says the chip date is 06/1997 which sounds really old...
Not sure what value this has at all... Oh wait I am, extremely little to none. Sorry OP but you need a far robuster test to give any insight and draw any conclusions. Not having a go, just saying what I see.
Benchmarks are better for comparing phones, hardware differences and of cause kernel tweaks / over clocking / under-voting. Not particularly useful for comparing ROM with ROMs. Try battery rundown tests, signal quality, camera quality, and other common daily use activities if you want to compare ROMs with one another.
EmptyArea said:
Not sure what value this has at all... Oh wait I am, extremely little to none. Sorry OP but you need a far robuster test to give any insight and draw any conclusions. Not having a go, just saying what I see.
Benchmarks are better for comparing phones, hardware differences and of cause kernel tweaks / over clocking / under-voting. Not particularly useful for comparing ROM with ROMs. Try battery rundown tests, signal quality, camera quality, and other common daily use activities if you want to compare ROMs with one another.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I feel like you replied that thread just to make polemic.
Maybe you didn't read the thread title.
I zoom it for you:
[ANTUTU]
4.1.2 Vs 4.3 Vs 4.4 (DALVIK & ART)
NOW, do you understand? It's just an ANTUTU SCORES THREAD.
Just read over the forum board, in about every kitkat thread people ask for benchmarks on ART.
Well, I did some on antutu (it's not just a try, it's a medium value) and I shared with others.
Benchmarks are not unuseful. They are an information like others to understand how is evolving a platform.
dvn2008 said:
What is the 'normal' Antutu benchmark value for stock 4.1.2?
Mine is only 16,412 really far from 20,000+ as shown in the OP's 4.1.2 ROM benchmark.
I am wondering if my low benchmark is because of the eMMC that just got replaced. The thing is that eMMC brickbug check says the chip date is 06/1997 which sounds really old...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
With the latest Antutu they changed the algoritms and now Note 2 scores much higher than before.
With the previous versions I scored about 17000. Try the latest release (with cold phone, to prevent thermal throttling).
Neak kernel make some difference, but not too much... just about 500 points or less, over the stock kernel.
I have 21800 with super stock rom lol. Odex without root or anything else....4.1.2
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda app-developers app
i thought 4.4 have better ram management.
thanks for sharing
Try out latest Devil Kernel !
latest Devil Kernel has new Samsung GPU Drivers ! on Antutu I get a score around 23k !
Note_two said:
latest Devil Kernel has new Samsung GPU Drivers ! on Antutu I get a score around 23k !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On what rom?
it´s CM 11 unofficial by xda member "Thddude"
A good comparison
Hello everyone, I just recently updated my note 4 N910C to lollipop, and I Tested it to see its benchmark score on Antitumor, but I'm really disappointed to see that it scored a total of 38738. Its even low than galaxy s5. Whats wrong?
mujikhalid said:
Hello everyone, I just recently updated my note 4 N910C to lollipop, and I Tested it to see its benchmark score on Antitumor, but I'm really disappointed to see that it scored a total of 38738. Its even low than galaxy s5. Whats wrong?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Does your device perform slow?No?Why the **** do you care about useless benchmarks....your device got a lower score than the S5 so what?Numbers don't equal performance...try doing a ful wipe if you already didn't...
There are already threads about this and you don''t care to search the forum before posting the same thread?
Woah dude, chill , dont be so pissed if you got to see a same thread on the forum lol
mujikhalid said:
Woah dude, chill , dont be so pissed if you got to see a same thread on the forum lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nah..I'm not pissed lol...sorry if I sounded like that it's just that those benchmarks are useless.Judge the device by the way you see how it performs in everyday use not by a number you got from a benchmark app...and also as I mentioned there are already threads about this so use the search function
Your note 4 shipped with 4.4. Its built for 4.4. Use 4.4
The rampant lust for updates, and the subsequent disappointment that follows is draining
dannstarr said:
Your note 4 shipped with 4.4. Its built for 4.4. Use 4.4
The rampant lust for updates, and the subsequent disappointment that follows is draining
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't have any problem with the 5.0.1 in Note 4. I'm coming from Galaxy S5 and there is no way the Note 4 is performing worse than the S5. Its way faster.
I agree that benchmark points is useless and says little about the performance of the device.
Man i have the same problem here it seems that the phone is always in power saving mode and the gpu is limited to 350 mhz instead of 700 mhz. Also the cpu runs at 1.3 ghz instead of 1.9 for the big cores thats why it has low score in antutu hope somebody figures out a solution and also this is a bug in this update
Sent from my SM-N910H using XDA Free mobile app
meh
You guys are just being paranoid, I even noticed that it got faster after the lollipop update, I would never care for benchmark numbers as long as I am satisfied with the performance in real world, benchmarks can be influenced by many factors and I barely trust them (and ofc I am talking about Android benchmarks)
Edit: I just tried running a benchmark in Antutu and got 37940, ran it again and guess what? I got 44304, how can I trust this? LOL (I knew it would be way different from a benchmark to another, as it used to happen with me on my old HTC One X, since then I never trust these benchmarks). Just enjoy your phone and stop looking for non-existent problems.
mujikhalid said:
Hello everyone, I just recently updated my note 4 N910C to lollipop, and I Tested it to see its benchmark score on Antitumor, but I'm really disappointed to see that it scored a total of 38738. Its even low than galaxy s5. Whats wrong?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Many places in xda I read about this antutu score, i want to know what will i get if my phone get 100000 score?we can win any price?
Thanks
its a bug
enable power saving mode and turn off cpu limit then turn off power saving mode back
go to developer option and reduce the animation to .5 sec
redo your test
Yathani said:
its a bug
enable power saving mode and turn off cpu limit then turn off power saving mode back
go to developer option and reduce the animation to .5 sec
redo your test
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tried all above, but still get 37K score. most degradation is in 3D graphics. Also in UX and single thread CPU.
Still can not understand why it happens.
I did the same thing nothing changed
Sent from my SM-N910H using XDA Free mobile app
so what were you expecting? A 75k + score after you updated?
Sent from my VZW LG G2
mrao said:
so what were you expecting? A 75k + score after you updated?
Sent from my VZW LG G2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Of course not, we expected the score to be at least the same !
Except the score you can notice that fps has dropped in games.
It also has some problems definitely, I have hangouts crashing several times a day.
UX runtime is much lower in my case also.
Benchmark scores are 100% useless.
zerojay said:
Benchmark scores are 100% useless.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no they are not useless and I can see that on practice, performance has slowed down just like benchmark scores got lower.
Benchmark can precisely tell and measure the performance, that's it's purpose. In my case I can feel the difference not only in benchmark scores bat in practice also.
Same for me. Tried fresh wipe, re-odin, etc
Benchmarks are 100% useful and in the fact the performance has gotten worse on the beastly note 4 it feels same as note 3 is that even called update anymore. The frames per second for big games is just arownd 20 fps its very disapointinf
Sent from my SM-N910H using XDA Free mobile app
sirwanesmail said:
Benchmarks are 100% useful and in the fact the performance has gotten worse on the beastly note 4 it feels same as note 3 is that even called update anymore. The frames per second for big games is just arownd 20 fps its very disapointinf
Sent from my SM-N910H using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
exactly what I was talking about !
Is anyone concerned about it and planning something or has samsung officials made any comment about this issue ?
Try this method & let me know about gpu bug.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=3075440