Not sure where to post this but I can only find only slimbean. Can't find any. Each variant's forum section has all three, which is why I'm lost. Stock roms are fine too. If someone can make a list that'd be great.
Posted on my Note 2 running BeanStalk. The Fine-Tuned AOSP.
Thought I was on Q&A section, please move.
Posted on my Note 2 running BeanStalk. The Fine-Tuned AOSP.
Related
I really don't get why there are 2 seperate Android development sub-forums if the mods leave them so unorganized and all threads mixed. That's make it so much harder to find things.
You should either combine them into 1 forum or make sure the right threads are in the right forums.
For example, all the below appear in the "Galaxy S III Android Development" while they supposed to be at the "Galaxy S III ORIGINAL (AOSP/AOKP) Android Development" (there are many more threads need to be shifted)
[ROM][AOSP][JB][4.1.1][STABLE] Android 4.1.1 JellyBean - BUILD 3 [31-07-12]
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1737449
[ROM][UNOFFICIAL][15-07-12] Android Open Kang Project - I9300 - Milestone 6
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1716001
[ROM][JB][4.1.1]PARANOIDANDROID v1.9.3-alpha [CM10Hybrid][30/07/2012]
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1745003
[CM10][UNOFFICIAL][JUL31] temasek's UNOFFICIAL BUILD - V8
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1797109
[ROM][AOSP]LiquidSmooth [4.1.1][Jelly Bean] v 2.0 beta 1 [07/30/2012]
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1796973
★★★ [ROM][AOSP/SAMMY][XXALF6][06/07] BlackStaR V3 JeLLy BeaN EdiTioN ★★★
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1703030
Please organize the forums.
TIA
P.S. I apologize if I posted this note in the wrong place, feel free to move it if needed.
doclucas said:
I really don't get why there are 2 seperate Android development sub-forums if the mods leave them so unorganized and all threads mixed. That's make it so much harder to find things.
You should either combine them into 1 forum or make sure the right threads are in the right forums.
For example, all the below appear in the "Galaxy S III Android Development" while they supposed to be at the "Galaxy S III ORIGINAL (AOSP/AOKP) Android Development" (there are many more threads need to be shifted)
[ROM][AOSP][JB][4.1.1][STABLE] Android 4.1.1 JellyBean - BUILD 3 [31-07-12]
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1737449
[ROM][UNOFFICIAL][15-07-12] Android Open Kang Project - I9300 - Milestone 6
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1716001
[ROM][JB][4.1.1]PARANOIDANDROID v1.9.3-alpha [CM10Hybrid][30/07/2012]
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1745003
[CM10][UNOFFICIAL][JUL31] temasek's UNOFFICIAL BUILD - V8
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1797109
[ROM][AOSP]LiquidSmooth [4.1.1][Jelly Bean] v 2.0 beta 1 [07/30/2012]
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1796973
★★★[ROM][AOSP/SAMMY][XXALF6][06/07] BlackStaR V3 JeLLy BeaN EdiTioN ★★★
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1703030
Please organize the forums.
TIA
P.S. I apologize if I posted this note in the wrong place, feel free to move it if needed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Most of the above, are kangs, builds of original work. Yes, each of these devs created a ROM, but they are all BASED on some original ROM in the Original dev section.
So while you might be thinking all AOSP ROMs are original, they are not.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
If you want to contact a moderator, PM them, opening a thread is a very slow way to get in touch with us.
Read this post on the portal for more information.
If a developer wishes to see their rom moved over, they can contact a moderator to see if it falls within the guidelines.
Someone kindly explain what the difference is between the two forums? I can't figure it out. This
[Nexus⁴]
Same as other forums...it's meant to be
Development - stuff based on the stock image
Original Development - Stuff made from AOSP/scratch
yea me either.
in the N7 forums.. the Kernels I like which are MOTLEY are posted in the Android Development forum yet in the N4 forums... the motley Kernel is posted in the Original development section.
no consistency or description.
i would have to guess that Original development is for development not headed down the path of AOSP or Android aka Linux/Ubuntu etc.. and then android development is for AOSP Android directly related stuff?
Edit i was wrong its reversed from what I thought.
I found it strange there is no thread for Omni in development forum? There was a thread but abandoned since there was no maintainer for the device. But since then unified builds happened, and i9505 /jfltexx has been mentioned as a device supported by the updater script:
https://github.com/omnirom/android_device_samsung_jflte/blob/android-4.4/BoardConfig.mk#L129
Is here anyone who uses the ROM as a daily driver, or anyone who has checked it in the last time, to share experience with us? I'm downloading it right now, and will try to find time tomorrow to check it.
The reason is that the thread is under 'Unified' subforum, where also other AOSP ROMs like Octo, Nameless, PA are. Strange CM isn't there too...
Hi all, there's been some back and forth as to which ROMs work on the dev edition. I decided to make a thread to list the ones I've tried and work. I figured we can share which worked and what you did to get them working (i.e. change APN, kernel, etc.). Thank you devs for sharing your great work I've used the following successfully:
Definitive
CM12 (known bugs)
Firekat (in T-mobile thread, daily driver)
Stock
Rick's
Well considering that there is no root available for the retail version it would make total sense that roms posted in the development forums are for the Dev edition of the device. I don't believe there is any question as which roms are for the Developer Device.
Edfunkycold
Have a great day!
I think he means Rom's that work versus those with too many bugs as opposed to DE vs RE rom's.
For this to be fully useful I would suggest links to the forum post for each Rom and listing out the different CM12 variants (AICP, PAC, etc.). Thanks
What I meant was, "I tried ROM xyz from the tmo forum using ABC kernel". I apologize if it wasn't clear enough. Some folks have successfully ported Roms that were for a different carrier.
kheltek said:
What I meant was, "I tried ROM xyz from the tmo forum using ABC kernel". I apologize if it wasn't clear enough. Some folks have successfully ported Roms that were for a different carrier.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My suggestion is that you edit the title also the other user has a great idea to post links for each one so you can actually have a help thread or index.
Edfunkycold
Have a great day!
edfunkycold said:
My suggestion is that you edit the title also the other user has a great idea to post links for each one so you can actually have a help thread or index.
Edfunkycold
Have a great day!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Will do, thank you for the suggestions.
kheltek said:
Hi all, there's been some back and forth as to which ROMs work on the dev edition. I decided to make a thread to list the ones I've tried and work. I figured we can share which worked and what you did to get them working (i.e. change APN, kernel, etc.). Thank you devs for sharing your great work I've used the following successfully:
Definitive
CM12 (known bugs)
Firekat (in T-mobile thread, daily driver)
Stock
Rick's
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So....how did you get Firekat to work, then?
I'll update the page with links, etc. today. The Dev, Mega, makes a Verizon Dev edition specific version of Firekat. 11x is the most recent and it is listed under the T-Mobile Note 4 section but labeled as vzw.
I need a kernel for Resurrection Remix 5.8.3, but I can not find the proper kernel and the synergy kernel did not work either
...
I'm also looking for the Kernel following upgrading to the latest version. Any help would be very much appreciated.
Confused which kernel ??
Kernels usually come with the rom or a linked in the roms thread >> found via search thread tab.
Or as a thread in development for individual kernels.
Your post lacks information as this thread relates to sept 2017 not today ,so a guess.
https://forum.xda-developers.com/search/thread/3748689?query=kernel
https://forum.xda-developers.com/search/thread/3615227?query=kernel
Exynos.
https://forum.xda-developers.com/search/thread/3543301?query=kernel
N900v
JJEgan said:
Confused which kernel ??
Kernels usually come with the rom or a linked in the roms thread >> found via search thread tab.
Or as a thread in development for individual kernels.
Your post lacks information as this thread relates to sept 2017 not today ,so a guess.
https://forum.xda-developers.com/search/thread/3748689?query=kernel
https://forum.xda-developers.com/search/thread/3615227?query=kernel
Exynos.
https://forum.xda-developers.com/search/thread/3543301?query=kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hello Goodnight
they will know if Synergy 14.1
Will it be compatible with N900v?
since it does not detect the sim if I install Synergy 19 .. / Synergy RC19 Unified 06012018
Thank you
ASk in Verizon forum .
Verizon Note 3 forum is here: https://forum.xda-developers.com/verizon-galaxy-note-3
Hmm...I have a distinct feeling that this post is relating to the fact that the OP's phone is unable to boot the later Resurrection Remix OS's, due to the fact that they are one of the 'unlucky ones' with kernel issues on their Note 3, like myself. @JJEgan knows what I am talking about. I suggest that the OP reads the last fifteen or so pages of this thread - https://forum.xda-developers.com/ga...rp-3-2-1-1-t3746760/post77193256#post77193256
I may be wrong, and you might not have this problem with your phone. It's just a hunch. If I am right though, I will say to you that at this moment in time, the case remains UNSOLVED, as nobody currently seems to know what the issue is.
I have made developers on here aware of it, such as @ashyx , @bigbiff and @ripee
Chris