Database Users

[REQ] MIUI Rom for Note

Hi all,
Translated from MIUI.com
"After a period of preparatory work, we are very pleased to open source will Patchrom projects Patchrom set up the thrust of the project is to strengthen the exchanges between all MIUI enthusiasts MIUI ROM, ported to more models. I hope to support this project, interact more, and more involved with this project to do.
From https://github.com/MiCode/PatchRom Download to patchrom the all code and supporting tutorials. To use the tutorial to help those who are not familiar with git friends, we have another provide patchrom project package to download, the download address for http://bigota.d.miui.com/micode/patchrom.zip
Have any questions patchrom project or this tutorial, we can feedback on the project forum. Sina microblogging "Wang Wenjun _ millet" and contact me, in particular, welcoming ROM production lovers on specific models."
Waiting for Developers who are willing to port Miui over to NOTE to give this patchrom a try.

Kinda confusing to read that. Could u provide the original link? On the side note.... The new mi phone specificly made for miui will have a dual boot ability to swap between asop and miui rom.... Kinda hot. It's amazing how this chinese rom has taken off based on cm
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk

Leechoonhwee said:
Hi all,
Translated from MIUI.com
"After a period of preparatory work, we are very pleased to open source will Patchrom projects Patchrom set up the thrust of the project is to strengthen the exchanges between all MIUI enthusiasts MIUI ROM, ported to more models. I hope to support this project, interact more, and more involved with this project to do.
From https://github.com/MiCode/PatchRom Download to patchrom the all code and supporting tutorials. To use the tutorial to help those who are not familiar with git friends, we have another provide patchrom project package to download, the download address for http://bigota.d.miui.com/micode/patchrom.zip
Have any questions patchrom project or this tutorial, we can feedback on the project forum. Sina microblogging "Wang Wenjun _ millet" and contact me, in particular, welcoming ROM production lovers on specific models."
Waiting for Developers who are willing to port Miui over to NOTE to give this patchrom a try.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can not understand what you are saying Bro.
Is there a MIUI Rom for Galaxy Note or ??

Nope, MIUI is now open source.
www.androidcentral.com/miui-rom-going-open-source
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium

Would LOVE MIUI on this phone! It's the thing I miss the most from my old sgs2.
Hopefully someone will make a ROM for us.

tg9413 said:
Kinda confusing to read that. Could u provide the original link? On the side note.... The new mi phone specificly made for miui will have a dual boot ability to swap between asop and miui rom.... Kinda hot. It's amazing how this chinese rom has taken off based on cm
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Coolkriss said:
Can not understand what you are saying Bro.
Is there a MIUI Rom for Galaxy Note or ??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, I read a little on the documentation provided and it seems that MIUI will now provide a patchrom which we can now freely integrate into a Stock ROM of our choice and it becomes a unofficial Miui ROM.
Core files like framework, systemui, and all the jar files need to be updated with MIUI codes.

Leechoonhwee said:
Well, I read a little on the documentation provided and it seems that MIUI will now provide a patchrom which we can now freely integrate into a Stock ROM of our choice and it becomes a unofficial Miui ROM.
Core files like framework, systemui, and all the jar files need to be updated with MIUI codes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
eyebe1970's Rocket rom v21 MIUI Style Themed, soon to come in v22, hopefully by tomorrow!
[ROM] ROCKET ROM - v21 - XXLA4 [Update 30/01] - JKay Mod Alpha3 - MIUI Style Theme!
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1380284

I somehow don't like MIUI. Feels more like using an iPhone. I really wish someone had cooked up an AOSP Gingerbread ROM at least for the Note. I am just way too pissed off with the laggy TouchWiz.

For MIUI port come here please!
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1484867

jodeltje said:
Would LOVE MIUI on this phone! It's the thing I miss the most from my old sgs2.
Hopefully someone will make a ROM for us.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
I miss the same thing.

[Q] What are actually source codes??Pls Help!

hi...
Ever since i have joined xda i have been listening about a particular device getting its source codes released (latestly galaxy note). All that i know is that source codes help the deving community a lot.
But how do they?
Are Source Codes untouched AOSP Roms that are untouched by carrier branding and have the native support for all hardware built in?
Today i stumbled upon opensouce.samsung.com and i found this:
GT-I5800
GT-I5800L GT-I5800_OpenSource.tar.gz
GT-I5800
GT-I5801
GT-I5801 HK
GT-I5801 INDIA GT-I5800_OpenSource_Update1(froyo).zip
GT-I5800D USA GT-I5800D_OpenSource(froyo).zip
GT-I5801 EUR GT-I5801_OpenSource.tar.gz
So these are froyo source codes i guess.
Are these of any use for cm devlopment (cm 6/7).
Sorry for the noobish questions!
Thanks in advance!

adityabhagat95 said:
hi...
Ever since i have joined xda i have been listening about a particular device getting its source codes released (latestly galaxy note). All that i know is that source codes help the deving community a lot.
But how do they?
Are Source Codes untouched AOSP Roms that are untouched by carrier branding and have the native support for all hardware built in?
Today i stumbled upon opensouce.samsung.com and i found this:
GT-I5800
GT-I5800L GT-I5800_OpenSource.tar.gz
GT-I5800
GT-I5801
GT-I5801 HK
GT-I5801 INDIA GT-I5800_OpenSource_Update1(froyo).zip
GT-I5800D USA GT-I5800D_OpenSource(froyo).zip
GT-I5801 EUR GT-I5801_OpenSource.tar.gz
So these are froyo source codes i guess.
Are these of any use for cm devlopment (cm 6/7).
Sorry for the noobish questions!
Thanks in advance!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Samsung releases some roms which aren't yet completed fully.
they are intended to be compiled by the rom developers and release it online..
this is the trend for the lazy samsung guys

But would it be beneficial for cm development??
And how are they incomplete ROMS? ajay can u pls answer them all..
Sent from my GT-I5800 using XDA App

adityabhagat95 said:
But would it be beneficial for cm development??
And how are they incomplete ROMS? ajay can u pls answer them all..
Sent from my GT-I5800 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the benefit of Cyanogenmod is that it is based on Gingerbread, which we can never get it officially by samsung....and CM contains lots of new features that Samsung will never give us

Source code is made by programmers. They type the code, and code is initially just text. The source code is then compiled into something that the phone can understand. That is what we get on the phone, the compiled stuff. The thing is changing the compiled stuff is harder an more restricted than changing code.
The difference is like the difference between changing/adding to an already finished meal (the compiled stuff) vs changing/adding to the recipe (the source code). You can do more and make more significant changes by changing the recipe (source code).

adityabhagat95 said:
But would it be beneficial for cm development??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
obviously, no
adityabhagat95 said:
And how are they incomplete ROMS? ajay can u pls answer them all..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
they are not finished compiling. They are meant to be compiled by us , And then we can flash it on our phone and then enjoy it
adityabhagat95 said:
Sent from my GT-I5800 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
nice

ajay.d96 said:
obviously, no
they are not finished compiling. They are meant to be compiled by us , And then we can flash it on our phone and then enjoy it
nice
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you just liked my tapatalk signature..haha.
Thanks for sharing the info .

[Q] Building OmniRom from resources for i9100

OK, so I am not a dev.
And iam completely newbie
I saw some people saying that if you have aosp on your device it's much easier to port omnirom for your device
So can I use CyanogenMod 10.2 that is available for the i9100
To build omni
And is there any detailed instruction on how to build it !!
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 4

I9100 needs some work because of its unified kernel, building it right now is pretty much useless if you don't know where to put your hands to solve some issues; I want to try it too but this project is in a early stage so I'll wait
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app

filllob said:
I9100 needs some work because of its unified kernel, building it right now is pretty much useless if you don't know where to put your hands to solve some issues; I want to try it too but this project is in a early stage so I'll wait
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup. There are two MAJOR blockers right now:
1) We haven't merged and tested the implementation of BOARD_SUPPRESS_EMMC_WIPE yet. So if someone were to build for a Superbrick-vulnerable device, they would have a a build that risks triggering Superbrick. While I normally don't like having moderators take down builds for something, if I see builds for Superbrick-vulnerable devices show up, I'm going to work with the mods to have them taken down until EMMC wipe suppression can be verified.
2) The build system needs some changes to permit TWRP to be built on userdebug builds. Right now, the only way you'll have a chance of working recovery is with an eng build.

Entropy512 said:
Yup. There are two MAJOR blockers right now:
1) We haven't merged and tested the implementation of BOARD_SUPPRESS_EMMC_WIPE yet. So if someone were to build for a Superbrick-vulnerable device, they would have a a build that risks triggering Superbrick. While I normally don't like having moderators take down builds for something, if I see builds for Superbrick-vulnerable devices show up, I'm going to work with the mods to have them taken down until EMMC wipe suppression can be verified.
2) The build system needs some changes to permit TWRP to be built on userdebug builds. Right now, the only way you'll have a chance of working recovery is with an eng build.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can we not use cm10.2 smdk4412 kernel, @Entropy512? EMMC_WIPE is disabled there?
Also, would there be any problems if one were to remove Omni bootable project and replace it with cm10.2's?

chasmodo said:
Can we not use cm10.2 smdk4412 kernel, @Entropy512? EMMC_WIPE is disabled there?
Also, would there be any problems if one were to remove Omni bootable project and replace it with cm10.2's?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, because it could still cause damage if flashing from an old "unsafe" kernel (see the first few CM10 builds as an example...). These are far rarer now than they used to be, but there are, believe it or not, occasionally people who are flashing stuff starting from TW ICS.
And CWM has tentacles throughout the CM source tree to get it to build. It requires too many hacks in too many places. TWRP is more standalone, the limitation being that on devices with standalone recovery, Dees_Troy always built using the "eng" variant instead of "userdebug".
There's a patch that allows for TWRP to build properly on userdebug using "make recoveryimage" but it fails to allow building of TWRP into unified-recovery devices like Sony pollux_windy/yuga. (Samsung requires even more hacks...)
Even the Sonys which are "sort of" working aren't ready for builds yet - for them to work they're dependent on the FOTAKernel trick Dees_Troy developed to allow for alternate recoveries to be put on a device.

Does the above apply also to the i9100g? It has an OMAP4 processor instead of Exynos so it should be easier to build for.

aidfarh said:
Does the above apply also to the i9100g? It has an OMAP4 processor instead of Exynos so it should be easier to build for.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm fairly certain the G has unified kernel/recovery just like most of the rest of the galaxys2 family (exception being the Qualcomm-based ones).
So it might build, but recovery will not function at all until the build system is fixed to properly support TWRP on devices with unified kernel/recovery.
It has nothing to do with Qualcomm vs. OMAP vs. Exynos, except that for whatever reason, Samsung actually allowed the recovery partition to serve its normal purpose on the Skyrocket and Hercules. Actually, the Straight Talk variant of the SGH-I777 might work, as that oddball device actually DID use its recovery partition.

Entropy512 said:
I'm fairly certain the G has unified kernel/recovery just like most of the rest of the galaxys2 family (exception being the Qualcomm-based ones).
So it might build, but recovery will not function at all until the build system is fixed to properly support TWRP on devices with unified kernel/recovery.
It has nothing to do with Qualcomm vs. OMAP vs. Exynos, except that for whatever reason, Samsung actually allowed the recovery partition to serve its normal purpose on the Skyrocket and Hercules. Actually, the Straight Talk variant of the SGH-I777 might work, as that oddball device actually DID use its recovery partition.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is there anything I can do to help? Maybe if I can make it work on my device?

So the I9000 got a build of OmniRom, I thought it has also a unified kernel !!!

I was searching on Google today
and I suddenly found this
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2494127
that's an alpha build for I9100
it's using the CM10 kernel and it uses CWM not TWRP
Iam testing it right now

Jiangyi had some success getting i9100g working last night
I'm attempting to build for n7000 to see if it works at all... Who knows. Although I still need to merge in BOARD_SUPPRESS_EMMC_WIPE...

Entropy512 said:
Jiangyi had some success getting i9100g working last night
I'm attempting to build for n7000 to see if it works at all... Who knows. Although I still need to merge in BOARD_SUPPRESS_EMMC_WIPE...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I built it for Note already
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2495930
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk

Yes @herna,you built it without a working recovery and without further testing. Nonetheless, it is running flawlessly, quicksand fluid with Raw kernel r3 and it's Cwm recovery.
Would you mind having a look at this commit.
http://review.cyanogenmod.org/#/c/50800/
Fixed the mobile data drop while calling. Thanks
GALAXY NOTE N7000 // OMNI ROM // JLS36I

AA1973 said:
Yes @herna,you built it without a working recovery and without further testing. Nonetheless, it is running flawlessly, quicksand fluid with Raw kernel r3 and it's Cwm recovery.
Would you mind having a look at this commit.
http://review.cyanogenmod.org/#/c/50800/
Fixed the mobile data drop while calling. Thanks
GALAXY NOTE N7000 // OMNI ROM // JLS36I
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I know. Entropy and me are looking for the error, but is not beeing easy to fix. Okey, will add in a few hours and release new one. And I correct you, except the latest version, I tried all versions I released and some others I didn't release. I always do but that day I needed phone for important family things and couldn't test
Also I went to release with a prebuilt TWRP 3.0.101 kernel but XplodWilD say me that this will get Semi-Official maybe, and only compiled non-touched ROMs will be released.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk

@Entropy512 just wondering if your commit "i777 bringup" can be applied (obviously with some changes) to i9100
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app

filllob said:
@Entropy512 just wondering if your commit "i777 bringup" can be applied (obviously with some changes) to i9100
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
n7000 bringup would be easier, methinks.

filllob said:
@Entropy512 just wondering if your commit "i777 bringup" can be applied (obviously with some changes) to i9100
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ask some DEV to try and see if works
Enviado desde mi GT-N7000 mediante Tapatalk
---------- Post added at 01:45 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:44 PM ----------
chasmodo said:
n7000 bringup would be easier, methinks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
N7000 is gonna be up as soon as XplodWild get free and merge it and change something I said him. Idk why my Gerrit is not working. I am gonna install Ubunt 13.10 for clean and will set up all again for try if I can get Gerrit working again
Enviado desde mi GT-N7000 mediante Tapatalk

I'd like to try it myself, just want to know if it's legit or not
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app

filllob said:
I'd like to try it myself, just want to know if it's legit or not
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If is legit what? I cannot understand you, sorry. You want to try, to compile...?

i am a noob to compiling etc, only followed cm instructions.
I want to know if the changes in the commit I mentioned can be applied to i9100 too, obviously with some adjustments, and if there is something more to do to compile omni for i9100
I hope I explained myself right( English is not my language)
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app

Carbon ROM official support, with your help.

Greetings.
Development for the Moto E has been progressing slowly. The few wonderful developers helping us have released builds with some issues that I'm sure with time will be resolved. They have lives and many other things to do, so I'm only grateful with them for taking the time to code for our "lower end" device.
That being said, and taking in consideration that our devices are low cost, could it be possible for us users to donate a few dollars each to send a device to a dedicated maintainer who is part of a development group?.
I personally love Carbon ROM. I have been using that ROM on different devices and always with the best of results. Simply put, I cannot use any other. It is as stable as CM, has all the right configuration options as AOKP, and coupled with Xposed, you can get your own perfect configuration.
I sent a private message to Carbon Dev, and they told me that as long as they have a physical device on hand, they can add it to the official list of supported devices.
I will donate $20. And I'm sure if every one of you can donate $1, we can easily get a Moto E to Carbon Dev in no time.
Is anyone else willing to help me to reach the proposed goal above detailed?.
Let me know, this could be a great alternative for our device.

I'm in!

I'm in with five bucks. Maybe more, if required.

Thank you for the couple of answers. But I think it's not going to be enough.
A shame since we non-developer users could help ourselves this way.
Anyway, it was worth a try.

I THINK...
Is more importan get oficial support from cyanogenmod... And with this files we can port other roms

xperiafan13 said:
Is more importan get oficial support from cyanogenmod... And with this files we can port other roms
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think there will be official support for dual Sim variant, as cm does not allow any device specific hacks in their builds. The single Sim variant got a chance.

Hetalk said:
I don't think there will be official support for dual Sim variant, as cm does not allow any device specific hacks in their builds. The single Sim variant got a chance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If we atleast get a stable cm for single sim variant even then there are many who can add dual Sim support to it like there is for moto g...
How can we request cyanogen team to add device to official list...
Any online request page or email?

luvk1412 said:
If we atleast get a stable cm for single sim variant even then there are many who can add dual Sim support to it like there is for moto g...
How can we request cyanogen team to add device to official list...
Any online request page or email?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the procedure for making CM support official :
1- All the hardware working on stock rom should work in CM build
2- no FC should be there
3- After making it stable we have to give Full source code ( github repo. ) to CM official devs.
4- they try it for atleast 3 weeks then if they found almost stable CM then they add it to their official support
Sent from my XT1022 using XDA

naveenultimategamer said:
the procedure for making CM support official :
1- All the hardware working on stock rom should work in CM build
2- no FC should be there
3- After making it stable we have to give Full source code ( github repo. ) to CM official devs.
4- they try it for atleast 3 weeks then if they found almost stable CM then they add it to their official support
Sent from my XT1022 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No.. I think you took my question wrong
I was asking that is there any way we can ask cm devs to help us in obtaining stable cm .. (Now I am finding this question as silly )

luvk1412 said:
No.. I think you took my question wrong
I was asking that is there any way we can ask cm devs to help us in obtaining stable cm .. (Now I am finding this question as silly )
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hahahaha
Thinking same If they help to get CM stable
Sent from my XT1022 using XDA Free mobile app

There is no term as a cm Dev. There are a lot of devs that post to cm builds.
If a new devices comes to the market, a new developer, who owns the device, can build cm for the device and fix issues, if any.
If cm makes it official, that particular Dev will be official maintainer for the device.

luvk1412 said:
No.. I think you took my question wrong
I was asking that is there any way we can ask cm devs to help us in obtaining stable cm .. (Now I am finding this question as silly )
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think it would be the same procedure as Carbon Team. Give them a device.
I would not mind giving $20, but we all need to contribute. Giving thanks does not help in this very specific case.

SirRhor said:
I think it would be the same procedure as Carbon Team. Give them a device.
I would not mind giving $20, but we all need to contribute. Giving thanks does not help in this very specific case.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ya I know giving only thanks does not help in this very specific case but I should do that much what I can I do as I am still a 16 year old student who gets rs70 as pocket money per week. So I don't have that much amount of money to contribute but still I can contribute an amount less than or equal to Rs 200 if it helps. It was less amount so I didn't mentioned . I really want development for moto e.

But how come there are loads of Roms for moto g dual Sim variant ???????
Sent from my GT-I9300 using XDA Free mobile app

gtsfreak said:
But how come there are loads of Roms for moto g dual Sim variant ???????
Sent from my GT-I9300 using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because it has official cm for single Sim and devs in large number

That is exactly why we need to give a device to one maintainer.

SirRhor said:
That is exactly why we need to give a device to one maintainer.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Till now we have 28$ but we need 105$ nearly (for me 1$=Rs.65 )

Anyone else willing to collaborate?. To this point, it does not matter if we give the device to CM or Carbon.

SirRhor said:
Anyone else willing to collaborate?. To this point, it does not matter if we give the device to CM or Carbon.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess people aren't ready to contribute to get a working c-rom.
Let's just wait and watch now.

Hetalk said:
I guess people aren't ready to contribute to get a working c-rom.
Let's just wait and watch now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Faith in humanity switch = OFF.

CM/AOSP ROM for G900H

Samsung Galaxy S5 G900H is one of the most neglected phones in a flagship range of phones! And the reason? Because of having an Exynos processor. Why aren't developers not developing no AOSP based custom ROMs for G900H? The source code is available online, and someone should at least take the initiative. If I knew how to do develop a ROM from scratch or If someone could teach me, I would have done it. But that is not the case. Are there people who have the skills to do the impossible? How do they make an AOSP ROM compatible for a device?

Well we can start a bounty but to be honest i'm going to get rid of my g900h as soon as the new Nexus comes out.

RMonst3r said:
Well we can start a bounty but to be honest i'm going to get rid of my g900h as soon as the new Nexus comes out.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is so true.. I find that all development happens for all the other major phones except the g900h.. and I feel so left out of the whole loop... *sigh*

Wait for some days. it is coming

jawzf said:
Samsung Galaxy S5 G900H is one of the most neglected phones in a flagship range of phones! And the reason? Because of having an Exynos processor. Why aren't developers not developing no AOSP based custom ROMs for G900H? The source code is available online, and someone should at least take the initiative. If I knew how to do develop a ROM from scratch or If someone could teach me, I would have done it. But that is not the case. Are there people who have the skills to do the impossible? How do they make an AOSP ROM compatible for a device?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
but why create a new thread for something thats already searchable and been talked about?

-PiLoT- said:
but why create a new thread for something thats already searchable and been talked about?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wanted to raise awareness.. This is because, the G900H is a very common variant in Asian, African and South American countries but has few developers for it..

jawzf said:
I wanted to raise awareness.. This is because, the G900H is a very common variant in Asian, African and South American countries but has few developers for it..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
my question was with the need for a new thread as opposed to adding to the old ones??

Cm-12 for g900h
MeTal-01 is working on Cm 12 for g900h
Here's the link : http://forum.xda-developers.com/android/software/cm12-s5-sm-g900h-t3105920
Github repo link for G900H : https://github.com/k2wl/android_device_samsung_k3g

Guys wait for it we are working on CM12.1 for Samsung Galaxy S5 Exynos along with @k2wl Its not easy to develop CM for Exynos due lot of limitation on hardware sources and many other changes are required. In short making cm12 for Exynos based devices take time hence you have to wait for it. we are developing cm12 just have patience, exynos is not has friendly has qcom.
Please be patient , we will update here our progress whenever we fix anything
Cheers!

jackeagle said:
Guys wait for it we are working on CM12.1 for Samsung Galaxy S5 Exynos along with @k2wl Its not easy to develop CM for Exynos due lot of limitation on hardware sources and many other changes are required. In short making cm12 for Exynos based devices take time hence you have to wait for it. we are developing cm12 just have patience, exynos is not has friendly has qcom.
Please be patient , we will update here our progress whenever we fix anything
Cheers!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah..please guys be patient and support @jackeagle and @k2wl . We will get cm soon! They both are well reputed dev of cm.
You guys can support them by commenting below as they will be needing tester. So please support!
Sent from my SM-G900H using XDA Free mobile app

Thank you
Thanks for the effort. We will be waiting for it.

ankpan said:
Thanks for the effort. We will be waiting for it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tester can comment below!!
Sent from my SM-G900H using XDA Free mobile app

Test
I will test.

i'll be happy to test it..

Tester
I can test CM12 for our G900H I have free time and im so excited with this news

ankpan said:
I will test.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
noez92 said:
i'll be happy to test it..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
DilanF98 said:
I can test CM12 for our G900H I have free time and im so excited with this news
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
PM me ur email id..lets make a group on hangout with reputed devs
Sent from my SM-G900H using XDA Free mobile app

Update
Guyz any update? ??

Add me to for testing bro

Add me for testing. I've already PM'd you. It's great to know we have developers for this phone.
Sent from my SM-T531 using XDA Free mobile app

This still updating? I can help with test. I have sm-g900h exynos