Samsung Galaxy SII GT-I9100 MIUI V5 Beta Unofficial - Galaxy S II General

Hi! Some of you may know That MIUI started to post 20 MIUI V5 unofficial builds and one of those phone is our galaxy s2 and I'm one of the Beta testers and. The build is based on aosp and the latest MIUI V5 3.3.22. So soon we can all wait for the official build the unofficial build is stable with little lags and minor bugs. But no stock MIUI or stock Samsung camera only the AOSP camera.
So here is my MIUI thread to see some screenshots and list of bugs. :laugh:
http://en.miui.com/thread-2689-1-1.html

They should use sammy base imo for better batyery preformace the battery preformace on aosp based roms is not even close to the efficency of the sammy base.
Also the sammy cam is way better than the aosp.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app

Yes you are right
roniez said:
They should use sammy base imo for better batyery preformace the battery preformace on aosp based roms is not even close to the efficency of the sammy base.
Also the sammy cam is way better than the aosp.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes the battery is better and the camera also, but I see that the battery is very good on this build and don't forget this is unofficial it mean that MIUI didn't ported this. So don't worry the official beta build will be on stock

Must be in General section i think...

Ok but How to move the thread
Prashanthme said:
Must be in General section i think...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How can I move the thread to General section thanks

Please move the thread to general section
Please some of the moderators on xda move my thread to General Section Thanks

roniez said:
They should use sammy base imo for better batyery preformace the battery preformace on aosp based roms is not even close to the efficency of the sammy base.
Also the sammy cam is way better than the aosp.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i think so because of the hw composer. without source codes jb is not different from ics..
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2

The battery sucks on stock Samsung ROMs. Wtf? I barely got 13 hours of battery life. Both stock kernel and custom one. AOSP is the way to go. Good choice.

Konstantinos said:
The battery sucks on stock Samsung ROMs. Wtf? I barely got 13 hours of battery life. Both stock kernel and custom one. AOSP is the way to go. Good choice.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium

Konstantinos said:
The battery sucks on stock Samsung ROMs. Wtf? I barely got 13 hours of battery life. Both stock kernel and custom one. AOSP is the way to go. Good choice.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
using gingerbread rom can be the solution for the battery, but jb's all difference from ics is hw composer.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2

I use it now more than 2 week, work very good and no issues!
Thanks and wish see new update ^_^
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2

drorcun said:
using gingerbread rom can be the solution for the battery, but jb's all difference from ics is hw composer.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Who is still running GB right now? :s
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium

NelinhoMarinus said:
Who is still running GB right now? :s
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no i'm not using gb. want to say use gb instead of aosp jelly bean. without hw composer there are not big difeerences..

Posted this over on the official beta thread on en.miui:
Forgive me for wondering, but why limit beta testing to 15 beta testers? Why not have anyone beta test? And if its due to simplification and easy tracking of bugs, have a seperate "official" testing team that report back and a general report from any other user that is kept seperate?
Yes, I do want MIUI v5 THAT much!!

jl10101 said:
Posted this over on the official beta thread on en.miui:
Forgive me for wondering, but why limit beta testing to 15 beta testers? Why not have anyone beta test? And if its due to simplification and easy tracking of bugs, have a seperate "official" testing team that report back and a general report from any other user that is kept seperate?
Yes, I do want MIUI v5 THAT much!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not efficient.

Moved to general

very good rom. very smooth and a pleasure to use
only issue is that there are some visual style inconsistency such as the round corners not in the right place or the tabs not placed correctly when dpi is changed

why, why AOSP based? why?:crying::crying::crying:

I already opened a thread here a few months ago
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2095696
As for the guy above me. All unofficial miui builds are aosp while official is Sammy based

Related

Closest stock android rom??

Hi, sorry if its been asked before but is there a rom that is close to stock android? If so which is it?
Thanks
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA Premium App
Why don't you just stay with the stock ROM?
Think the op was asking closest to stock android not stock sgs2
Cm7 looks like stock but has loads of extra goodness. Not for beginners and its still a wip but still.. well its ace the devs are doing magic stuff
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
nilezon said:
Why don't you just stay with the stock ROM?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm adventurous lol, na all seriousness I just wanna try summink different, I've got touchwiz , I've had sense, , but never tried stock android and a lot of people on here rave about it, so just wanted to try it out
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA Premium App
pahardie said:
Think the op was asking closest to stock android not stock sgs2
Cm7 looks like stock but has loads of extra goodness. Not for beginners and its still a wip but still.. well its ace the devs are doing magic stuff
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I tried cm on my desire hd it was quite good but always went back to sense as I liked it, but in my opinion touchwiz is a bit more stock androidy feel to it rather than sense , so wanted to go all out and just try out stock android , so the cm rom, is it available yet? Obviously not stable I take it??
Oh I would also like to ask if someone can tell me is what's the difference between cm stable and nightly builds??
I think I can assume what stable means but never knew what a nightly build was??
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA Premium App
Its not 'stable' yet for sgs2 in fact the first nightly only came out today.
Stable releases are known quantities I.e set milestones whereas nightly builds have commits added as they're submitted... nature of the beast some will fix stuff some might cause issues. Pot luck.
Stick with stable builds (there isn't one for sgs2 yet) if you want something rock solid without the occasional gremlin or two.
I quite like touchwiz but always run launcherpro so rarely bump into tw!
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App

Which ROM is being used widely ?

Lets see how many users are using Custom Rom , Stock Samsung ROM , MIUI or CM7....
Vote at your will.
Using my own custom sammy rom . I like to put my own touch to them lol. CM7 is ok but i find anything AOSP roms have flaws but props to the devs.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
My custom ROM too. Aosp.
Sent from HydrOG3N MOD S2.
Technology Evolves, Android Evolves.
HydrOG3N is THE Revolution.
Oxygen 2.3.2, or HydrogenMod.
Aosp for me all the way.
Regards
To be fair, stock would be the most used rom.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
chrisjcks said:
To be fair, stock would be the most used rom.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Heh, true that. I guess most people are just using stock roms, maybe with a custom kernel. This phone works fine the way it is actually, there are just some little flaws that can be fixed with a couple of hacks, and some colours which are a bit out place, but we have some nice themes after all.
Aosp roms are blazing fast tho, really unrivaled in terms of smoothness if you wanna play games...the problem with those is that they aren't 100% bug free as the ones i was using on my Desire, so i find it hard to use them as a daily driver for more than a few days every now and then on this particular phone.
Hyperdroid androidmeda with speedmod kernel.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Galnet MIUI ICS builds. Far better than anything else.
stock 2.3.5 PT + juicedefender
thats it
checkk
CheckROM with ICS syndicate theme work perfect for me!
You're going to get a biased result asking on xda, as its where people who like modding go. Most users will not know about xda or bother with custom roms and be using stock
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA Premium App
im a little bit confused because i come from nexus one, where the biggest part use CM builds, but here there seems to be a more even distribution among users..... any special reasons?
Was on cognition for a long while. on darky ROM now.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
pinkster said:
im a little bit confused because i come from nexus one, where the biggest part use CM builds, but here there seems to be a more even distribution among users..... any special reasons?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I prefer Samsung custom roms because they are so freakin smooth. Excellent stock browser, I love TouchWiz and the launcher, superb camera interface, and an awesome video player app.
Hyperdroid all the way-official ROM of the 2012 Olympics.
You guys wants me to add more poll items for Custom Stock ROM ?
I'm trying out omega and liking it so far,
Reason why the large distribution is because really, the phone works as is pretty well. It just needs a few tweaks to get rid of that garbage late night battery full alert and a couple other things. Since most people are looking for stock + tweaks, there's a lot of different tweaks available.
WajkIUI... i hope the spelling is right.. excellent ROM
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
I am using CM7 nightlies with SPB Shell 3D.
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S II
hyperdroid androidmeda. flashed it about 2 days back. works well for me

POLL: Your Galaxy S Plus I9001 ROM

Please vote the poll for your Galaxy S Plus I9001 ROM
Should be in General Section not in Development :silly:
Sorry
all of them, except miui
I change it every day, so I can't give precise answer
TwinHeadedEagle said:
I change it every day, so I can't give precise answer
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, me too often, so it would be useful the possibility to edit the vote casted in the poll.
What is the point of making poll and not including any or almost any GB roms? Great roms like Gigabread+, MoonROM, Crybernation, CM7 and the ones I can't remember now?
There is no point.
evemir said:
What is the point of making poll and not including any or almost any GB roms? Great roms like Gigabread+, MoonROM, Crybernation, CM7 and the ones I can't remember now?
There is no point.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exact. I was wondering the possibility to add / edit poll answers, but this seem not possible.
Flashed and tried most of them, and allways back to stock VP (modded by me) rom.
my vote
CyanogenMod 9 by ivendor
I use EHNDROIX 12.9.11 but 12.9.16 is okay^^
Please add CyanogenMod10 by Doomsday94
Using CyanogenMod 9 by ivendor now
RemICS is an alternative.
GIGABREAD+
(http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1639740)
Awesome all-in-one-ROM
fast and stable
very low battery consumption
.......
Sent from my GT-I9001 using xda premium
I prefer AOKP and since there are no Updates by oisis I use AOKP by Crybert with some CM9 cherrypicks
Sent from my GT-I9001 using xda premium
I want to change my answer but can't!! :crying:
Now using: DoomNEXUS
Gigabread user since 5 months ago!
Don't be a n00b, be a newbie!
Inviato con 7770 Tapatalk
geko08 said:
GIGABREAD+
(http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1639740)
Awesome all-in-one-ROM
fast and stable
very low battery consumption
.......
Sent from my GT-I9001 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
I tried AOSP, CM9, Blazr and then this and this one is the best. Antutu score is also highest -- 5748!
still on GB. Shadow0 ROM v2.1E. Freely customizable...
i tried almost every rom
but i think aokp and slimrom are the one for me

JELLY BEAN is awesome!

So if you are here every day you may realize that I was the guy who kept saying that GB was incredible. But a few days ago I got bored of it and decided to jump directly to JB 4.1.2, I'm using some random rom calles Kang AOKP or so and totally blown away by its smoothness and customization and battery life. I pushed GB to its limit by extreme customization but it was no way this good. Google and developers did follow the right track, this rom is much morw helpful for my daily use. Of course I still find some bugs but I think I'll try another rom and never come back to older versions. ICS was a failure in my eyes but JB is a perfect win for me.
I heard that from 4.1.2 it's a lot different, so I think I'll keep trying with 4.1.2
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app
+2 actually.
JB is awesome - as a flashaholic I just wish I could try more of the JB ROMS - but some of the download sites suck speed wise for me! or I can't get to them at the office
Rocking ROMS I have used - Jelly King, Vanilla Rootbox, Super Nexus and RR.
Dual boot Jelly King + whichever takes my fancy for today on Dorimanx 7.10
Improvement over ICS is :laugh::good:
Another Vote For Rootbox...Very Impressive ROM
Jelly Bean is really awesome, pity the big delays that non-nexus devices have to get official ROMs.
Praise the developers that work hard to offer us all the goodies ahead of time :laugh:
Jb is nice but has too much bugs you need to deal with the one I can't live with is the audio volume bug in the headphones.. Really gb is better than ics cm9 rom?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app
GalaxyGusta said:
Jb is nice but has too much bugs you need to deal with the one I can't live with is the audio volume bug in the headphones.. Really gb is better than ics cm9 rom?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You know that the headphone volume is a Exynos-specific issue, don't you?
kicksilver said:
You know that the headphone volume is a Exynos-specific issue, don't you?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes I know... We're in the galaxy s2 forum so it's relevant don't you think?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app
Wait, is your volume issue the same as mine? My volume is too big with headphone, when I play the music with headphone it's so big that I have to use volume level 1 or 2...
By the way, thanks for the suggested rom, I think I'll try them, but could u guys suggest me a rom which is the most simple and closest to Google's original rom?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app
rootbox wins
vsync experimental ROM ftw.
And custom kernels have a workaround for low headphone volume. There aren't really that many noticeable bugs to be honest.
karendar said:
vsync experimental ROM ftw.
And custom kernels have a workaround for low headphone volume. There aren't really that many noticeable bugs to be honest.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What kernels have this work around for low volume?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
+1 I've tried several ICS ROMs, but was getting great performance with GB so I didn't move. Then moved directly to JB, never look back.
what about project butter? is it implemented in these ROMs?!
I guess not.
I appreciate the hard work that developers put on their ROMs but i think without project butter these are incremental ICS upgrades IMHO
Agree. I already tried GB and ICS, but I think ICS doesn't good enough than GB. But JB is very nice and I really like it.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app
blackaholic said:
Agree. I already tried GB and ICS, but I think ICS doesn't good enough than GB. But JB is very nice and I really like it.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 without any doubts
current running cm10 vsync 27/10 .. great battery life so far...
xman323 said:
what about project butter? is it implemented in these ROMs?!
I guess not.
I appreciate the hard work that developers put on their ROMs but i think without project butter these are incremental ICS upgrades IMHO
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
vsync is integrated in the experimental vsync build in the android dev forums... It's the closest you'll get to project butter for now. Works great.
---------- Post added at 04:34 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:33 PM ----------
drelite08 said:
What kernels have this work around for low volume?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Siyah with extweaks, DorimanX kernel also... It's an option in extweaks itself which can raise headset, speaker and mic gain.
drelite08 said:
What kernels have this work around for low volume?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
RootBox v3.1
Running 4.0.4 on mine, very smooth no issues. After all the trouble with my optimus 2x on cm10 (calls not working) I think ill stay stock rooted for a while.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
Running Samsung stock ICS and will never move to JB until they change notification bar color and main icons

4.2 AOSP out!

Woohoo! Can't wait for cm10 team to start merging in the new 4.2 goodness!
http://www.droid-life.com/2012/11/13/android-4-2-headed-to-aosp-right-now/
Woohoo....see what the devs come up with on this
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
thats just great! cant wait to get the n10 and flash it with a good & nice aosp rom
Yep looking forward to this to. I have been running Siyah Kernel for a couple of weeks and it's great to be able to switch between the stable stock based rom and CM10
Yep same as on the Nexus 7 forums too, looking forward to having 4.2 AOSP on both my Galaxy S3 and Nexus 7:laugh:
Want omega's team to get cracking
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Won't take long to CM10-4.2 get released. I guess 4.2 uses the same base and stuff, so won't be a problem. Still, I may stick with Samsung. I love CM10 but not CM10 for i9300. Colors doesn't look good, laggy and a lot of random bugs.
Looking forward to it. Unfortunately cm10 on i9300 is beyond the team's control . If Samsung took their thumbs outta their asses and start releasing the RIGHT source and docs for Xynos, we might actually get somewhere. Its a miracle we've come this far without it.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
I see a lot of people comment that Touchwiz ROMs run more smoothly than CM based builds. This is exactly the opposite of my experience. I find the Cyanogen team's work to be second to none, which is remarkable considering they're volunteering their time.
nnotis said:
I see a lot of people comment that Touchwiz ROMs run more smoothly than CM based builds. This is exactly the opposite of my experience. I find the Cyanogen team's work to be second to none, which is remarkable considering they're volunteering their time.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Definitely agree with you!
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
More power to the CM Team! I loved the ROM ever since.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
It's freaking me out a bit that my Verizon Galaxy Nexus will get a 4.2 custom ROM before my Nexus 4. WTF?
With the CM vs TW ROM debate, is there one Vanilla ROM that you think proves that theory that they run smoother and faster because I'd love to test it if there is one. I've always also felt that TW runs smoother? Maybe I'm wrong. Is LiquidSmooth a good example?
foxhound tw Rom is ridiculously smooth
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Let's not change this thread to a TW vs CM, shall we?
Wohoooo! cant wait to get this one on my phone!
RoadXY said:
Let's not change this thread to a TW vs CM, shall we?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
why fight when siyah gives the best of both worlds
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
RoadXY said:
Let's not change this thread to a TW vs CM, shall we?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think that comment probably did that more than anyone else's. I think it's a perfectly valid part of the discussion. I'm not suggesting we sit here and go back and forth on ROM names. But I'll ask my question in a different way. What is it about the AOSP release that's out there now that isn't working well that will be improved by this 4.2 release? Ultimately, this isn't about one ROM base vs another it's about whether AOSP can be made to work bug-free with the I9300 hardware, isn't it?
tinpanalley said:
I think that comment probably did that more than anyone else's. I think it's a perfectly valid part of the discussion. I'm not suggesting we sit here and go back and forth on ROM names. But I'll ask my question in a different way. What is it about the AOSP release that's out there now that isn't working well that will be improved by this 4.2 release? Ultimately, this isn't about one ROM base vs another it's about whether AOSP can be made to work bug-free with the I9300 hardware, isn't it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I believe it's also to do with what new FEATURES have been added to the new AOSP release and less to do with how much stability it will add (since that is dependent more on Samsung releasing the source than what AOSP has to offer in terms of stability).
Some of us would like to make use of the new features of 4.2 and not have to wait for an official Samsung update.
Having said all this, at the end of the day, that's my point of view and I don't expect everyone to agree.
dilwaala said:
Woohoo! Can't wait for cm10 team to start merging in the new 4.2 goodness!
http://www.droid-life.com/2012/11/13/android-4-2-headed-to-aosp-right-now/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Woot, the race is on!

Categories

Resources