Database Users

[Q] Anyone working on ice cream sandwich 4.0 for ZTE Blade?

Hi to all our dear developers,
I have started this thread to ask who all are working on development of Ice Cream Sandwich ROM for ZTE Blade?
In case you need any support in testing the ROM, I would be more than happy to volunteer.
Best,
Yatin

yatinthakur said:
Hi to all our dear developers,
I have started this thread to ask who all are working on development of Ice Cream Sandwich ROM for ZTE Blade?
In case you need any support in testing the ROM, I would be more than happy to volunteer.
Best,
Yatin
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Source code hasn't being released yet.

yatinthakur said:
Hi to all our dear developers,
I have started this thread to ask who all are working on development of Ice Cream Sandwich ROM for ZTE Blade?
In case you need any support in testing the ROM, I would be more than happy to volunteer.
Best,
Yatin
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i just the source code will be released in 2 weeks so u can expect a port by november end.

Sdk wont boot on blade. Tried many times
posted from my Nokia 5146

hecatae said:
Sdk wont boot on blade. Tried many times
posted from my Nokia 5146
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that's wierd, how u got HC to boot up, did u add the "lines" in boot.img??

doubt, it'll even run on the blade..

SWEATTAIMI said:
that's wierd, how u got HC to boot up, did u add the "lines" in boot.img??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the honeycomb sdk was compiled for arm v6, the ics sdk was compiled for arm v7. zte blades only have an arm v6 processor.
so, we need the source code so that it can be recompiled for our arm v6 phones. There's a little bit more to it than that, so don't expect ics for the blade on the same day as the source code is released, but we need the source code before we can start work on a blade version.
hopefully we'll get a working port of cm9 (which will be based on ics).

wbaw said:
the honeycomb sdk was compiled for arm v6, the ics sdk was compiled for arm v7. zte blades only have an arm v6 processor.
so, we need the source code so that it can be recompiled for our arm v6 phones. There's a little bit more to it than that, so don't expect ics for the blade on the same day as the source code is released, but we need the source code before we can start work on a blade version.
hopefully we'll get a working port of cm9 (which will be based on ics).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ah, thats sucks =/

http://m.androidcentral.com/ice-cream-sandwich-source-code-coming-nov-17-says-notion-ink-ceo
The code should be out 17th Nov... Hopefully...

I think the source code got released .

xtremevicky said:
I think the source code got released .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How come
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using xda premium

xtremevicky said:
I think the source code got released .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It did & it's already being worked on by one of the guys responsible for cm7 on the blade. It's still early & lots of problems so far, but it boots.

wbaw said:
It did & it's already being worked on by one of the guys responsible for cm7 on the blade. It's still early & lots of problems so far, but it boots.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you know how to contact him ? I may need to ask him how it got to boot my port goes to black screen
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda premium

I do, but I think he's pretty busy. Last I heard there were still some big problems to fix, like audio.

wbaw said:
I do, but I think he's pretty busy. Last I heard there were still some big problems to fix, like audio.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i only need to know how to make it boot correctly

saaransh9 said:
i just the source code will be released in 2 weeks so u can expect a port by november end.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So, as you people know that the source code is released now. We are hoping already any ETA to keep our hopes & eventually survive #hope you got my desponess..
Sent from my GT-I5800 using Tapatalk

SWEATTAIMI said:
i only need to know how to make it boot correctly
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
once he's worked it out the source code for cm9 will be available, then you can use that.
using the aosp source code, once you have it booting there are still other problems to fix, like the touch screen, audio & ril.
everyone involved with cyanogenmod should be very busy fixing those problems, so it's best to leave them to it if you can't help them. they don't need to be bothered with questions.

wbaw said:
once he's worked it out the source code for cm9 will be available, then you can use that.
using the aosp source code, once you have it booting there are still other problems to fix, like the touch screen, audio & ril.
everyone involved with cyanogenmod should be very busy fixing those problems, so it's best to leave them to it if you can't help them. they don't need to be bothered with questions.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah i know l0l

[ROM: DEV] CM7.2 .35 kernel

Ok, this is just something I have been playing with and thought I would share.
It is CyanogenMod 7.2, as close to stock as I can make it. I have taken a lot from Ezet and some stuff from Forumber.
This is not source based as I do not have a grunty enough system to build CyanogenMod from source.
Most importantly, I have started on a new kernel based on the TomGiordano source here:
https://github.com/TomGiordano/kernel_huawei
My Kernel Source:
https://github.com/PaulMilbank/kernel_huawei/tree/cm7-u8800-35
Will upload my source once I can sort out the sources on my computer. I am doing some mods on Aurora kernel too which I will release at some point.
After a few false starts, I compiled the source with their cyanogenmod_u8800_defconfig and it works pretty well for CM7.2.
I fixed atmel vibration using DZOs aurora commits as a guide.
Probably most broken stuff is defconfig related.
Bugs:
Keypad LED's do not work
Autobrightness does not work
Light sensors do not work- probably the cause of the above problems.
Camera force closes
You tell me
Working:
Wifi works
RIL works
Screen/video drivers work well, screen does not suffer annoying no wakeup for me like other kernels.
Atmel Virtual Key vibration works
You tell me
Get It Here:
http://www.mediafire.com/?b2dc7kdmixvas18
I will try and fix all these bugs, but I would be keen for some help too. I don't have time to be a full time dev.
As always, I am not responsible for any bricks, fires or nuclear wars that come about from installing this rom.
Please, please backup with CWM before flashing this.
Paul

PaulMilbank said:
Ok, this is just something I have been playing with and thought I would share.
It is CyanogenMod 7.2, as close to stock as I can make it. I have taken a lot from Ezet and some stuff from Forumber.
This is not source based as I do not have a grunty enough system to build CyanogenMod from source.
Most importantly, I have started on a new kernel based on the TomGiordano source here:
https://github.com/TomGiordano/kernel_huawei.git
Will upload my source once I can sort out the sources on my computer. I am doing some mods on Aurora kernel too which I will release at some point.
After a few false starts, I compiled the source with their cyanogenmod_u8800_defconfig and it works pretty well for CM7.2.
I fixed atmel vibration using DZOs aurora commits as a guide.
Probably most broken stuff is defconfig related.
Bugs:
Keypad LED's do not work
Autobrightness does not work
Light sensors do not work- probably the cause of the above problems.
Camera force closes
You tell me
Working:
Wifi works
RIL works
Screen/video drivers work well, screen does not suffer annoying no wakeup for me like other kernels.
Atmel Virtual Key vibration works
You tell me
Get It Here:
http://www.mediafire.com/?b2dc7kdmixvas18
I will try and fix all these bugs, but I would be keen for some help too. I don't have time to be a full time dev.
As always, I am not responsible for any bricks, fires or nuclear wars that come about from installing this rom.
Please, please backup with CWM before flashing this.
Paul
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Camera issue??? Please, any issues but camera
»»Sent From My U8800««

This is just to see if I can get people interested in development. I will try document as much as possible what I do and see if we can get some people interested in building a kernel and getting a really good gingerbread cyanogenmod build out. If this goes nowhere, I will just focus on Aurora kernel and ICS. There are a few things I would like to try and include in Aurora to add some features.
We need good 2.6.35 source and this is a good source with a few small bugs, probably due to the config not being completely right. Hopefully they are minor and easily fixed. We have a lot of kernel development going on around the place and we can learn from commits to make a really good build hopefully.
Will try their 7x30_defconfig to make a kernel for my B528 rom too and see what works.
If you replace the boot.img in this rom with the boot.img in Forumber's latest cm7.2 build, it sould all work and give a 2.6.35 experience close to Ezet's 2.6.32 build. It will likely not be as stable because LEWA kernel on my phone at least, is crap.

PaulMilbank said:
This is just to see if I can get people interested in development. I will try document as much as possible what I do and see if we can get some people interested in building a kernel and getting a really good gingerbread cyanogenmod build out. If this goes nowhere, I will just focus on Aurora kernel and ICS. There are a few things I would like to try and include in Aurora to add some features.
We need good 2.6.35 source and this is a good source with a few small bugs, probably due to the config not being completely right. Hopefully they are minor and easily fixed. We have a lot of kernel development going on around the place and we can learn from commits to make a really good build hopefully.
Will try their 7x30_defconfig to make a kernel for my B528 rom too and see what works.
If you replace the boot.img in this rom with the boot.img in Forumber's latest cm7.2 build, it sould all work and give a 2.6.35 experience close to Ezet's 2.6.32 build. It will likely not be as stable because LEWA kernel on my phone at least, is crap.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can use VictorTeam's source.

forumber2 said:
You can use VictorTeam's source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you know where it is, I have not been able to find it. Thanks very much man. Keen top take a look at what they have been doing.

PaulMilbank said:
Do you know where it is, I have not been able to find it. Thanks very much man. Keen top take a look at what they have been doing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They have github group https://github.com/Victor-android

.35 kernel based CM7.2 would be pretty dope to me, especially if tethering works

PaulMilbank said:
Do you know where it is, I have not been able to find it. Thanks very much man. Keen top take a look at what they have been doing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
here:https://github.com/Victor-android/kernel_huawei/tree/2.6.35-cm-u8800

Thanks, this will likely take a while longer than I thought it would as I am having trouble getting my sources synced locally and on github. If we can pull together all the sources into a kick ass kernel, we should have a really good CM7.2, I would like a rom with built in tethering too. It will just take some time. Running through DZOs excellent repo with a readymade .config and then making small changes is a lot easier than having to make it all up as we go and sort out sources and configs. Maybe I should not have been so cocky at the start!

PaulMilbank said:
Thanks, this will likely take a while longer than I thought it would as I am having trouble getting my sources synced locally and on github. If we can pull together all the sources into a kick ass kernel, we should have a really good CM7.2, I would like a rom with built in tethering too. It will just take some time. Running through DZOs excellent repo with a readymade .config and then making small changes is a lot easier than having to make it all up as we go and sort out sources and configs. Maybe I should not have been so cocky at the start!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice to hear that someone's still working on U8800's .35 kernel. Good job so far!

PaulMilbank said:
Thanks, this will likely take a while longer than I thought it would as I am having trouble getting my sources synced locally and on github. If we can pull together all the sources into a kick ass kernel, we should have a really good CM7.2, I would like a rom with built in tethering too. It will just take some time. Running through DZOs excellent repo with a readymade .config and then making small changes is a lot easier than having to make it all up as we go and sort out sources and configs. Maybe I should not have been so cocky at the start!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you use your vendor files for compiling CM7?

forumber2 said:
Do you use your vendor files for compiling CM7?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, I am just using your and Ezets prebuilt binaries and apk's. I do not have the computer power or skill to build from source!

PaulMilbank said:
No, I am just using your and Ezets prebuilt binaries and apk's. I do not have the computer power or skill to build from source!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But you could compile kernel?

Compiling and downloading kernel is much smaller and faster. Also their are a lot of comments and files to follow.
Compiling cyanogenmod from source is a huge download and would take forever to compile on my computer. Plus nobody documents the process well and it us specialized to the phone.
Maybe if I can get a good kernel going, others can build cyanogenmod sources for .35 kernel. It all just takes time.
Sent from my U8800 using xda premium

PaulMilbank said:
Compiling and downloading kernel is much smaller and faster. Also their are a lot of comments and files to follow.
Compiling cyanogenmod from source is a huge download and would take forever to compile on my computer. Plus nobody documents the process well and it us specialized to the phone.
Maybe if I can get a good kernel going, others can build cyanogenmod sources for .35 kernel. It all just takes time.
Sent from my U8800 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Will you try your luck with cm9/10?

PaulMilbank said:
Compiling and downloading kernel is much smaller and faster. Also their are a lot of comments and files to follow.
Compiling cyanogenmod from source is a huge download and would take forever to compile on my computer. Plus nobody documents the process well and it us specialized to the phone.
Maybe if I can get a good kernel going, others can build cyanogenmod sources for .35 kernel. It all just takes time.
Sent from my U8800 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if you send vendor files to me,i can compile in my free time

forumber2 said:
if you send vendor files to me,i can compile in my free time
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe Ezets here:
https://github.com/ezeteze/android_device_huawei_u8800.
Not sure otherwise. I don't have any vendor files sorry.

Use these vendor files: click. I built CM 7.2 yesterday and it works just fine with those vendor files.

Unrealized said:
Use these vendor files: click. I built CM 7.2 yesterday and it works just fine with those vendor files.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
but in this vendor,GPU can't run fully,has a little lag. If we solve this problem,we can make a good cm7 :good:

forumber2 said:
but in this vendor,GPU can't run fully,has a little lag. If we solve this problem,we can make a good cm7 :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Guess it has something to with the "new" Adreno drivers. Might do some benchmarking later with the older ones. I haven't really experienced lagging myself though. it's kinda the same as w/ .32 based CM7 (especially when using ADWLauncher)

Trying to port JB ROM

Hey guys.
I am new to android developing.
I started by porting the CM10.1 ROM from HTC Desire, but my phone is stuck at the Huawei logo when it boots up.
I can still flash another ROM, but that is not the problem.
I want to know how to fix this. I want it to go past the Huawei Logo.
By the way, I used this procedure: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1598713 and I used Aurora ICS 5.0 for the base ROM. I know it doesn't have the same version of android, but there is no reason I shouldn't be experimenting like this.
Can anyone help?
Thanks.

rqmok said:
Hey guys.
I am new to android developing.
I started by porting the CM10.1 ROM from HTC Desire, but my phone is stuck at the Huawei logo when it boots up.
I can still flash another ROM, but that is not the problem.
I want to know how to fix this. I want it to go past the Huawei Logo.
By the way, I used this procedure: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1598713 and I used Aurora ICS 5.0 for the base ROM. I know it doesn't have the same version of android, but there is no reason I shouldn't be experimenting like this.
Can anyone help?
Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Delete phone.apk and try it?
Sent from my U8800-51

You can't port CM10.1 ROM to ICS ROM as base. That is inpossible.

I know
Mlopik said:
You can't port CM10.1 ROM to ICS ROM as base. That is inpossible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know, but it is not completely impossible.
I also tried to port it with CM10.1 that you are trying to fix, but I still get the same thing.
I will setup logcat and upload the information here.
Thanks.

Need to ask something
Hey again.
I haven't had time to do anything to my phone yet.
I am replying to ask if there is an awesome tutorial out there that could help me with this porting?
Currently, to port my ROM, I replaced files in port ROM from base ROM. Should I replace files in base ROM from port ROM?
Thanks for the help.

Hi Again
Hello.
I found out that there was a problem with the base ROM.
I have ported CM10.1 from U8800! Yaay!
But there are four things that are not working:
- WiFi
- Bluetooth
- Cam Recording
- Sound
Can you guys tell me how to fix the audio? In the logcat, it says that there is no sound output.
Thanks

CatLog results
Hey guys.
I've got the log attached to this reply. Have a look at the audio events and see what is wrong. I can't figure it out by myself.
Thanks

When will you releasing it fully functional?

Working on JB
Djuganight said:
When will you releasing it fully functional?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have just ported the Jelly Bean from u8800pro to u8800non-pro, so I will be working on this ROM.
Seriously, I have no idea when I will be releasing a fully functional ROM. Because I have my studies as well, so I don't get much time to work on the ROM.
The audio is working in this ROM (wasn't working in the previous port),
The things that are currently not working are:
- WiFi
- Bluetooth
- Video Recording
I will try my best to do as much as possible.
I am new at building android ROMs, so please don't expect too much from me
I will be needing some help from other developers as well.
Do you think I should make a thread for this? or is there already enough not-fully functional JB ROMs there?
Thanks.:good:

Lololololol ridiculous!
Another porting, same issues...
How many are now? 4, 5 Jelly beans?
Ooo man, some times is just better to stay quiet....

Djuganight said:
Lololololol ridiculous!
Another porting, same issues...
How many are now? 4, 5 Jelly beans?
Ooo man, some times is just better to stay quiet....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know how you feel. I also feel that way.
I would like to build Jelly Bean from source, like Blefish is doing right now, but I need a 64bit computer for that (mine is only 32bit. Unless there is a hack for this, I can't build from source.
I think everyone is going to start porting Jelly Bean ROMs until one starts working. :silly:

Everyone is porting the rom with the intention of making ir fully working and then abandon development. Why don't you and others continue the work that is already done instead of making a new port which will end up like the others.
Like your are having compatibility issues due to your 32bit computer, perhaps our device is incompatible with JB...

Djuganight said:
Everyone is porting the rom with the intention of making ir fully working and then abandon development. Why don't you and others continue the work that is already done instead of making a new port which will end up like the others.
Like your are having compatibility issues due to your 32bit computer, perhaps our device is incompatible with JB...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
U8800 is compatible with JB.

Djuganight said:
Everyone is porting the rom with the intention of making ir fully working and then abandon development. Why don't you and others continue the work that is already done instead of making a new port which will end up like the others.
Like your are having compatibility issues due to your 32bit computer, perhaps our device is incompatible with JB...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Our device will remain compatible with every new android untill android will be using some new architecture of processor, so "sometimes it's better to stay silent".
OP, abandon your trials of getting a working JB using copy-paste ports. It can be only ported from source.
P.S.: just install ubuntu x64 and try to build something like CWM recovery out of forumber's source. If it builds, you can build anything you want. Today's computers know how to emulate x64. I'm myself using an old pentium d 820 (i386, sse2 and that's all) and I can build.

Mlopik said:
U8800 is compatible with JB.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That I don't know for sure but I believe our is. But why 4 or 5 JB around, all with exactly same issues
Now I and others also pick up a JB Rom, mod it here and there and then instead of 4/5 roms we can have dozens. Then again non working well. This makes sense?

Djuganight said:
That I don't know for sure but I believe our is. But why 4 or 5 JB around, all with exactly same issues
Now I and others also pick up a JB Rom, mod it here and there and then instead of 4/5 roms we can have dozens. Then again non working well. This makes sense?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's still same ROM with other features.. It isn't simply fix Wi-Fi without source.

Djuganight said:
That I don't know for sure but I believe our is. But why 4 or 5 JB around, all with exactly same issues
Now I and others also pick up a JB Rom, mod it here and there and then instead of 4/5 roms we can have dozens. Then again non working well. This makes sense?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because most of devs or those who like to be called developers don't have required knowledge and then leave the project as an excuse.
Honestly I have no hope that we can see a JB rom fully functional.

dark_vader said:
Because most of devs or those who like to be called developers don't have required knowledge and then leave the project as an excuse.
Honestly I have no hope that we can see a JB rom fully functional.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why you don't make some for android yourself? if it's so simply.

nagato.fm said:
Our device will remain compatible with every new android untill android will be using some new architecture of processor, so "sometimes it's better to stay silent".
OP, abandon your trials of getting a working JB using copy-paste ports. It can be only ported from source.
P.S.: just install ubuntu x64 and try to build something like CWM recovery out of forumber's source. If it builds, you can build anything you want. Today's computers know how to emulate x64. I'm myself using an old pentium d 820 (i386, sse2 and that's all) and I can build.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So I can install ubuntu x64 on my x86 laptop? Are you talking about a virtual machine or installing ubuntu x64 on the actual laptop?
And as for others: Instead of saying that JB is not compatible with our device and all that sh*t, why don't you encourage me and give me some solutions.
Anyways, I am not posting this JB ROM until it's fully functional, because I might stop development as well (getting interested in firefox os).

rqmok said:
So I can install ubuntu x64 on my x86 laptop? Are you talking about a virtual machine or installing ubuntu x64 on the actual laptop?
And as for others: Instead of saying that JB is not compatible with our device and all that sh*t, why don't you encourage me and give me some solutions.
Anyways, I am not posting this JB ROM until it's fully functional, because I might stop development as well (getting interested in firefox os).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First of all,your CPU must support x64,If it supported,you can install x64 to you computer.
If you want install x64 system in virtual machine (like VirtualBox),you CPU must support VT-x or AMD-V (virtualization).
You can check virtualization and x64 support via SecurAble;
http://securable.en.softonic.com

[WIP] Sailfish OS for OPX

Hello OPX community,
I started to work on the port and its progressing nicely, UI is up also Wifi works now, but many things still don't work, so help is defintly appreciated.
Current status: wiki.merproject.org/wiki/Adaptations/libhybris
OLD:
I don't know if some of you know Sailfish OS, but its an OS that is not based on Android with an outstanding UI and UX.
And developers can port it to Android based devices like ours \o/
So I took the hand and compiled Sailfish OS and Android, but unfortunaly I don't really have the time to test since this is my only phone.
So I need someone to either test and report to me or what would be better someone that can develope further on its own after I shared my knowledge with him.
This thread is for talking about everything related to Sailfish OS.
Here are some useful links:
Jolla.com
Sailfish Porting
HADK

+1
This would be my dream coming true...
I might be able to test it, if You can make a flashable zip. Is this build supposed to support android runtime? If I flash it, my recovery and internal SD remains untouched?

osvatha said:
+1
This would be my dream coming true...
I might be able to test it, if You can make a flashable zip. Is this build supposed to support android runtime? If I flash it, my recovery and internal SD remains untouched?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Android Support is currently not available for ported devices but there are some devs working on an open source solution.
Your recovery will stay the same.
Internal SD should stay untouched of you don't wipe it but it will probably not visible from sailfish but there was a fix for that, dunno if that is already upstream.

https://twitter.com/taaeem_/status/690475762609168384
UI is booting up on the OnePlus X!!

Still having Jolla with me and running Sailfish OS on OpX hw would make it sweet.

prarun2030 said:
Still having Jolla with me and running Sailfish OS on OpX hw would make it sweet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can say it's really really smooth :victory:

I haven't heard about this OS, is this some custom ROM, CM based? or what? :silly:

FcoEnrique said:
I haven't heard about this OS, is this some custom ROM, CM based? or what? :silly:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's a completely different OS, it's based off Mer which is kind of a Linux distribution and on top of that sits sailfish OS. CM is only used on Android via libhybris to get the hardware working. In fact it's completely different from Android and NOT based on it like CM. It's real Linux as a mobile OS.

Wifi up
Bluetooth up
All sensors up
Audio up
\o/

Nice progression, thanks for effort. Had a Jolla-device before and loved it. The HW build quality just wasnt there. Altough, I'd love to get the opensource dalvik-emu to work some day, since I have a bad feeling about future sw development on SailfishOS.

Awesome. Sorry I haven't been able to get back to you on the latest build. I haven't had time lately. Life kinda showed up abf took my time with it. I'll try to observe it later.

taaeem said:
I can say it's really really smooth :victory:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
:good:

taaeem said:
It's a completely different OS, it's based off Mer which is kind of a Linux distribution and on top of that sits sailfish OS. CM is only used on Android via libhybris to get the hardware working. In fact it's completely different from Android and NOT based on it like CM. It's real Linux as a mobile OS.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sounds interesting, may have to look more about it.

Waiting for release to test!

Development would be much faster if we multirom for our device

taaeem said:
Development would be much faster if we multirom for our device
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is there multirom for oneplus X ? ?

sankarshan said:
Is there multirom for oneplus X ? ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No sadly not

Sim is now detected and mobile data is working after adding your apn to settings \o/ video and music playback should also work now and RTC alarms are working so you never need to worry if your phone is off you won't miss that alarm

taaeem said:
Sim is now detected and mobile data is working after adding your apn to settings \o/ video and music playback should also work now and RTC alarms are working so you never need to worry if your phone is off you won't miss that alarm
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol! And when we will be able to test it?

TheJedeX said:
Lol! And when we will be able to test it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I could post it in a few hours, but than you don't have a camera, no LED and probably no calls (needs to be confirmed)
It would really be only a test build.
If I should do it, write it now
EDIT: Ah also Jolla Store is not working atm needs to be resolved server side. But there is still openrepos.

[Q] when we get android 8 for our nexus 4?

hi friends,
do you know, our nexus 4s get android Oreo by nitrogen or lineage or other roms? if yes, I know stable android Oreo version will release mid august, when we get custom rom?

we can't know this

When it comes fyi: asking for an ETA is kinda rude on xda
wait till October or November probably for a decently stable ROM

Excitedly expect first android Oreo Rom for nexus 4 on september 17

and first 32bit snapdragon android oreo port, fully work
https://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=73494285&postcount=1356
so, now we have very big chance for our nexus 4...

and first nexus 5 android oreo port, booting and wifi working now, one similiar devices too
https://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=73538437&postcount=6286

for now has boot problem but after all the first nexus 4 oreo
https://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=73594437&postcount=231

I have compiled android 8 and I managed to get it booting(lots of changes on kernel and device tree). Need a lot of work but mako probably will get a fully fuctional android 8 rom.

good news
thanks for good news,
and maybe co-operation accelerates this work
equlog said:
I have compiled android 8 and I managed to get it booting(lots of changes on kernel and device tree). Need a lot of work but mako probably will get a fully fuctional android 8 rom.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

If anyone wants to try Oreo in our lovely mako.
Original thread: Android 8.0 Mako
Download: here

equlog said:
If anyone wants to try Oreo in our lovely mako.
Original thread: Android 8.0 Mako
Download: here
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice! At work and don't have my N4 to try it, but interested to hear how it is running, so I can try out when I get home. Is it mostly functional?

Can you share the device and kernel tree?

equlog said:
I have compiled android 8 and I managed to get it booting(lots of changes on kernel and device tree). Need a lot of work but mako probably will get a fully fuctional android 8 rom.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just for my own curiosity, how do you know what changes need to be made to the device and kernel tree? Do you use officially supported device/kernel trees as a reference, or is there a guideline posted somewhere?

ariesgodofwar said:
Nice! At work and don't have my N4 to try it, but interested to hear how it is running, so I can try out when I get home. Is it mostly functional?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really I haven't tested too much, busy at work... also my n4 have the touch screen broken and doesn't works very good lol.. but almost nothing works.
Its just to try out.
Renandelfanti said:
Can you share the device and kernel tree?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure, i'll upload to github later.
TheSt33v said:
Just for my own curiosity, how do you know what changes need to be made to the device and kernel tree? Do you use officially supported device/kernel trees as a reference, or is there a guideline posted somewhere?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The kernel is the used one in 7.1.2 and I added the Binder changes... the device tree is fixed by trying to booting and fixing the errors showed in last_kmsg .

equlog said:
Really I haven't tested too much, busy at work... also my n4 have the touch screen broken and doesn't works very good lol.. but almost nothing works.
Its just to try out.
Sure, i'll upload to github later.
The kernel is the used one in 7.1.2 and I added the Binder changes... the device tree is fixed by trying to booting and fixing the errors showed in last_kmsg .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, I also flashed this and it boots. As you said, nothing works... But it is not less that it boots :laugh:
I've been trying since the source of O is released and could not boot it. Your work gives all mako users hope to see a working O build :good: Thanks for the work!
Nitin

I as well got a semi-working O build, but was a bit short on time to work on it. Could we collaborate somewhere? Perhaps a hangouts group?

I've flashed from mako 7.12, kind of like upgrade from 7.12

Sources up.
I used the vendor blobs from TheMuppets.
https://github.com/MakOreo
---------- Post added at 01:42 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:24 AM ----------
Ziyan said:
I as well got a semi-working O build, but was a bit short on time to work on it. Could we collaborate somewhere? Perhaps a hangouts group?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
:good:
I dont have too much free time, but I always follow the status of my devices. I Hope to see a fully working O rom asap.

Ziyan said:
I as well got a semi-working O build, but was a bit short on time to work on it. Could we collaborate somewhere? Perhaps a hangouts group?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's a good idea... What do you say @equlog?
Thanks a lot for sharing the sources :good:
Nitin

as good as we hoped