Ok, this is just something I have been playing with and thought I would share.
It is CyanogenMod 7.2, as close to stock as I can make it. I have taken a lot from Ezet and some stuff from Forumber.
This is not source based as I do not have a grunty enough system to build CyanogenMod from source.
Most importantly, I have started on a new kernel based on the TomGiordano source here:
https://github.com/TomGiordano/kernel_huawei
My Kernel Source:
https://github.com/PaulMilbank/kernel_huawei/tree/cm7-u8800-35
Will upload my source once I can sort out the sources on my computer. I am doing some mods on Aurora kernel too which I will release at some point.
After a few false starts, I compiled the source with their cyanogenmod_u8800_defconfig and it works pretty well for CM7.2.
I fixed atmel vibration using DZOs aurora commits as a guide.
Probably most broken stuff is defconfig related.
Bugs:
Keypad LED's do not work
Autobrightness does not work
Light sensors do not work- probably the cause of the above problems.
Camera force closes
You tell me
Working:
Wifi works
RIL works
Screen/video drivers work well, screen does not suffer annoying no wakeup for me like other kernels.
Atmel Virtual Key vibration works
You tell me
Get It Here:
http://www.mediafire.com/?b2dc7kdmixvas18
I will try and fix all these bugs, but I would be keen for some help too. I don't have time to be a full time dev.
As always, I am not responsible for any bricks, fires or nuclear wars that come about from installing this rom.
Please, please backup with CWM before flashing this.
Paul
PaulMilbank said:
Ok, this is just something I have been playing with and thought I would share.
It is CyanogenMod 7.2, as close to stock as I can make it. I have taken a lot from Ezet and some stuff from Forumber.
This is not source based as I do not have a grunty enough system to build CyanogenMod from source.
Most importantly, I have started on a new kernel based on the TomGiordano source here:
https://github.com/TomGiordano/kernel_huawei.git
Will upload my source once I can sort out the sources on my computer. I am doing some mods on Aurora kernel too which I will release at some point.
After a few false starts, I compiled the source with their cyanogenmod_u8800_defconfig and it works pretty well for CM7.2.
I fixed atmel vibration using DZOs aurora commits as a guide.
Probably most broken stuff is defconfig related.
Bugs:
Keypad LED's do not work
Autobrightness does not work
Light sensors do not work- probably the cause of the above problems.
Camera force closes
You tell me
Working:
Wifi works
RIL works
Screen/video drivers work well, screen does not suffer annoying no wakeup for me like other kernels.
Atmel Virtual Key vibration works
You tell me
Get It Here:
http://www.mediafire.com/?b2dc7kdmixvas18
I will try and fix all these bugs, but I would be keen for some help too. I don't have time to be a full time dev.
As always, I am not responsible for any bricks, fires or nuclear wars that come about from installing this rom.
Please, please backup with CWM before flashing this.
Paul
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Camera issue??? Please, any issues but camera
»»Sent From My U8800««
This is just to see if I can get people interested in development. I will try document as much as possible what I do and see if we can get some people interested in building a kernel and getting a really good gingerbread cyanogenmod build out. If this goes nowhere, I will just focus on Aurora kernel and ICS. There are a few things I would like to try and include in Aurora to add some features.
We need good 2.6.35 source and this is a good source with a few small bugs, probably due to the config not being completely right. Hopefully they are minor and easily fixed. We have a lot of kernel development going on around the place and we can learn from commits to make a really good build hopefully.
Will try their 7x30_defconfig to make a kernel for my B528 rom too and see what works.
If you replace the boot.img in this rom with the boot.img in Forumber's latest cm7.2 build, it sould all work and give a 2.6.35 experience close to Ezet's 2.6.32 build. It will likely not be as stable because LEWA kernel on my phone at least, is crap.
PaulMilbank said:
This is just to see if I can get people interested in development. I will try document as much as possible what I do and see if we can get some people interested in building a kernel and getting a really good gingerbread cyanogenmod build out. If this goes nowhere, I will just focus on Aurora kernel and ICS. There are a few things I would like to try and include in Aurora to add some features.
We need good 2.6.35 source and this is a good source with a few small bugs, probably due to the config not being completely right. Hopefully they are minor and easily fixed. We have a lot of kernel development going on around the place and we can learn from commits to make a really good build hopefully.
Will try their 7x30_defconfig to make a kernel for my B528 rom too and see what works.
If you replace the boot.img in this rom with the boot.img in Forumber's latest cm7.2 build, it sould all work and give a 2.6.35 experience close to Ezet's 2.6.32 build. It will likely not be as stable because LEWA kernel on my phone at least, is crap.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can use VictorTeam's source.
forumber2 said:
You can use VictorTeam's source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you know where it is, I have not been able to find it. Thanks very much man. Keen top take a look at what they have been doing.
PaulMilbank said:
Do you know where it is, I have not been able to find it. Thanks very much man. Keen top take a look at what they have been doing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They have github group https://github.com/Victor-android
.35 kernel based CM7.2 would be pretty dope to me, especially if tethering works
PaulMilbank said:
Do you know where it is, I have not been able to find it. Thanks very much man. Keen top take a look at what they have been doing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
here:https://github.com/Victor-android/kernel_huawei/tree/2.6.35-cm-u8800
Thanks, this will likely take a while longer than I thought it would as I am having trouble getting my sources synced locally and on github. If we can pull together all the sources into a kick ass kernel, we should have a really good CM7.2, I would like a rom with built in tethering too. It will just take some time. Running through DZOs excellent repo with a readymade .config and then making small changes is a lot easier than having to make it all up as we go and sort out sources and configs. Maybe I should not have been so cocky at the start!
PaulMilbank said:
Thanks, this will likely take a while longer than I thought it would as I am having trouble getting my sources synced locally and on github. If we can pull together all the sources into a kick ass kernel, we should have a really good CM7.2, I would like a rom with built in tethering too. It will just take some time. Running through DZOs excellent repo with a readymade .config and then making small changes is a lot easier than having to make it all up as we go and sort out sources and configs. Maybe I should not have been so cocky at the start!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice to hear that someone's still working on U8800's .35 kernel. Good job so far!
PaulMilbank said:
Thanks, this will likely take a while longer than I thought it would as I am having trouble getting my sources synced locally and on github. If we can pull together all the sources into a kick ass kernel, we should have a really good CM7.2, I would like a rom with built in tethering too. It will just take some time. Running through DZOs excellent repo with a readymade .config and then making small changes is a lot easier than having to make it all up as we go and sort out sources and configs. Maybe I should not have been so cocky at the start!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you use your vendor files for compiling CM7?
forumber2 said:
Do you use your vendor files for compiling CM7?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, I am just using your and Ezets prebuilt binaries and apk's. I do not have the computer power or skill to build from source!
PaulMilbank said:
No, I am just using your and Ezets prebuilt binaries and apk's. I do not have the computer power or skill to build from source!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But you could compile kernel?
Compiling and downloading kernel is much smaller and faster. Also their are a lot of comments and files to follow.
Compiling cyanogenmod from source is a huge download and would take forever to compile on my computer. Plus nobody documents the process well and it us specialized to the phone.
Maybe if I can get a good kernel going, others can build cyanogenmod sources for .35 kernel. It all just takes time.
Sent from my U8800 using xda premium
PaulMilbank said:
Compiling and downloading kernel is much smaller and faster. Also their are a lot of comments and files to follow.
Compiling cyanogenmod from source is a huge download and would take forever to compile on my computer. Plus nobody documents the process well and it us specialized to the phone.
Maybe if I can get a good kernel going, others can build cyanogenmod sources for .35 kernel. It all just takes time.
Sent from my U8800 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Will you try your luck with cm9/10?
PaulMilbank said:
Compiling and downloading kernel is much smaller and faster. Also their are a lot of comments and files to follow.
Compiling cyanogenmod from source is a huge download and would take forever to compile on my computer. Plus nobody documents the process well and it us specialized to the phone.
Maybe if I can get a good kernel going, others can build cyanogenmod sources for .35 kernel. It all just takes time.
Sent from my U8800 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if you send vendor files to me,i can compile in my free time
forumber2 said:
if you send vendor files to me,i can compile in my free time
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe Ezets here:
https://github.com/ezeteze/android_device_huawei_u8800.
Not sure otherwise. I don't have any vendor files sorry.
Use these vendor files: click. I built CM 7.2 yesterday and it works just fine with those vendor files.
Unrealized said:
Use these vendor files: click. I built CM 7.2 yesterday and it works just fine with those vendor files.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
but in this vendor,GPU can't run fully,has a little lag. If we solve this problem,we can make a good cm7 :good:
forumber2 said:
but in this vendor,GPU can't run fully,has a little lag. If we solve this problem,we can make a good cm7 :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Guess it has something to with the "new" Adreno drivers. Might do some benchmarking later with the older ones. I haven't really experienced lagging myself though. it's kinda the same as w/ .32 based CM7 (especially when using ADWLauncher)
Related
Hi all,
I am so excited now, can't wait to tell all you guys that news
Maybe someone know that I have upgraded our kernel to the newest kernel tree from nvidia's git and waiting for it to be stable for daily use. However, I found it can't boot in the newest ACER's stock ROM yesterday. After one full day hack, it finally can boot in the stock ROM now.
However, the last function I can't confirm is HDMI support, so I want some volunteers to test HDMI support and the stability. If you use vache's Taboonay 0.9.x and are interested in it, please PM me
Thanks
I can test the stability, but not the HDMI output.
P.S : Nice to see you here roggin
I can test hdmi, only 720p, but at least I can verify that.
roggin said:
Hi all,
I am so excited now, can't wait to tell all you guys that news
Maybe someone know that I have upgraded our kernel to the newest kernel tree from nvidia's git and waiting for it to be stable for daily use. However, I found it can't boot in the newest ACER's stock ROM yesterday. After one full day hack, it finally can boot in the stock ROM now.
However, the last function I can't confirm is HDMI support, so I want some volunteers to test HDMI support and the stability. If you use vache's Taboonay 0.9.x and are interested in it, please PM me
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What kernel is it? If I may ask.
Can it OC?
Johnny0906 said:
What kernel is it? If I may ask.
Can it OC?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nvidia's kernel is the ORIGINAL kernel, all others base their continued work on, so Acer use these updates as reference..
Can you check up on the bluetooth issue on this kernel you make..
I know tiamat/xoom kernel is really close to stock nvidia kernel too (or fully supported with drivers). so maybe something dirty needs changing..
havent had chance to fix..
problem for now, seems to be it can scan, but seems to timeout on transmitting, so it suddenly cannot see new units after some minutes. maybe worth doublechecking.
vache said:
I can test the stability, but not the HDMI output.
P.S : Nice to see you here roggin
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi vache,
Coooool, it's so nice to see you here
I have pm you the link, please take it a try
Thanks for your help again
Johnny0906 said:
What kernel is it? If I may ask.
Can it OC?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sorry, I haven't added OC code in it, but I will add it when it stable enough
Thanks
Dexter_nlb said:
Can you check up on the bluetooth issue on this kernel you make..
I know tiamat/xoom kernel is really close to stock nvidia kernel too (or fully supported with drivers). so maybe something dirty needs changing..
havent had chance to fix..
problem for now, seems to be it can scan, but seems to timeout on transmitting, so it suddenly cannot see new units after some minutes. maybe worth doublechecking.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi Dexter_nlb:
I have tested the bluetooth function in this kernel, it works fine in my kernel
If you are interested in it, I can mail or share a link of my kernel source for you
Thanks
roggin said:
However, the last function I can't confirm is HDMI support, so I want some volunteers to test HDMI support and the stability. If you use vache's Taboonay 0.9.x and are interested in it, please PM me
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi Roggin,
I play with versions and can test HDMI 1080P with Taboonay 0.9.1. Please send me the link to kernel. Do you make also modules, especialy for 3G?
roggin said:
Hi Dexter_nlb:
I have tested the bluetooth function in this kernel, it works fine in my kernel
If you are interested in it, I can mail or share a link of my kernel source for you
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
please do i would love to play around with it "internally" and testing...
im little occupied atm, so hdmi can be tested, and regular use for now..
I can probably make you the oc add-ons and see how it turns out with your work and send you my diff back.. (don't know git commit)
I would be willing to due some stability testing with the acer stock rom.
Let me know.
Dexter_nlb said:
please do i would love to play around with it "internally" and testing...
im little occupied atm, so hdmi can be tested, and regular use for now..
I can probably make you the oc add-ons and see how it turns out with your work and send you my diff back.. (don't know git commit)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi Dexter_nlb,
It's a big big help that you can help me ,
I am not releasing kernel source is because I don't want to brick someone's tablet, but It's ok for power developer like you.
I am uploading the kernel, I will info you when uploading done
Thanks for your help
snickle said:
I would be willing to due some stability testing with the acer stock rom.
Let me know.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi snickle,
I think it's fine using Taboonay's ramdisk in stock rom, but not sure
If you can help me for test, I will pm the link for you
Thanks
roggin said:
I am not releasing kernel source is because I don't want to brick someone's tablet
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If they know how to compile it, then I guess they can enjoy their brick
Just be careful not releasing the source code, as it is under a open licence. I'm pretty sure that's why thor2002ro's kernel thread was deleted by moderators off fo this forum. I don't want to see another Kernel development go south because it wasn't public .
roggin said:
Hi snickle,
I think it's fine using Taboonay's ramdisk in stock rom, but not sure
If you can help me for test, I will pm the link for you
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think the usage of ramdisk should be optional, because it might not allow to encrypt your device, and as you hopefully know, encryption is necessary to allow exchange activesync connection for email push, except if somebody finds out a what has to be modified to use activesync without encryption.
I also join ShadowXVII concerning the kernel source, if somebody wants to brick his device, it's up to him, but be carefull not to get removed because you did not publish the source.
otherwise well done my friend.
zoubidou said:
I also join ShadowXVII concerning the kernel source, if somebody wants to brick his device, it's up to him, but be carefull not to get removed because you did not publish the source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You only have to publicly release the source if you publicly release the binary - he's only obliged to give the source to the people he gave the binary to. So there's no problems
On that note: I've just flashed Taboonay and am happy to give your kernel a try. I don't have a dev environment set up these days, but if you can send me the boot.img I'll take a crack at it.
themono said:
You only have to publicly release the source if you publicly release the binary - he's only obliged to give the source to the people he gave the binary to. So there's no problems
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cool, thanks for the clarification. Just being cautious as I'd prefer Kernel development wasn't hindered at all. That being said, a public source may promote development as opposed to ending up with several different kernels by different developers. I'm all for collaboration, and it's great to see some within this thread
On a side note, any Kernel developers that may be able to shed some light onto this thread would be appreciated -- in particular, the kernel requirements for networking over USB; http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=15452414#post15452414
Hi all,
It's not I don't want to release it. It's almost 300+ patches between older and newer version, and include some regulator voltage patch. I want to sure not damage any part in all functions.
Give me one more days, when I collect all necessary response from tester, I will release it
Thanks
I did exactly the same on the tiamat kernel, waited and hoped to had time debugging the bluetooth issue, but got modarator complaints on not publicing any source
anyways, as long as no binary appear in this thread, i think you're safe from any mods attacking you on GPL issues (or do like thor200ro move it offsite, if you feel like breaking GPL)
Talk is just talk for now, no mods can argue against that for now..
UNOFFICIAL AOKP Nightly Builds
Since AOKP development has started picking up with their addition of their new Gerrit server, I've decided to release nightly builds for AOKP. These should be released every day anywhere from 6-9pm depending on when I get time to do it. Also, some days I might not get the time. However, it should be almost every day that a new build comes out.
All credits go toward the entire AOKP team for their efforts in making one of the most customizable builds out there right now. It is absolutely fantastic.
You can download it by sorting by date uploaded right here on my goo.im profile:
http://goo.im/devs/rohan/tenderloin/aokp_nightlies
Note: These downloads are provided untested. This might break your system so be sure to keep a backup handy. Nightly builds are usually more unstable than any other type of ROM, but if you want the latest features then use this. I do not take responsibility for anything that may happen to your system.
Another note: These downloads do not come with any sort of support. Do not ask for help in IRC for aokp if you are running these nightlies. They are not official and thus are not officially supported. So don't go and give roman and the other devs a headache
And another note: They don't come with gapps, download those separately from goo.im or some other source.
You should just be able to download and install the zip in CWM, then wipe caches. Reboot and enjoy. No other wiping is needed, only caches.
Right now I am building on my personal PC (I don't have a server) so I apologize if it takes a while to get builds up! My system isn't the fastest at making builds haha
I will be making these ROMs updateable via the goo.im app probably this weekend, I don't have much time right now to figure out how it works.
If you want to find out when I release the new nightly, follow me on twitter: http://twitter.com/rohanXm
Looking forward to it!
Is there a changelog like the CM nightlies?
What exactly is aokp?
Ventus_zx said:
What exactly is aokp?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://knowmydroid.com/blog/what-is-aokp-rom-how-is-it-different-from-cm9
AOKP is pretty awesome. I run it on my Epic 4G and I agree it's more customizeable than CM9 and pretty solid in terms of reliability . Thanks for these Touchpad Nightlies Rohan! Installing it as we speak!
Nburnes said:
Is there a changelog like the CM nightlies?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can find what was merged here:
http://gerrit.sudoservers.com:8080/#/q/status:merged,n,z
It will display some other device stuff, though most AOKP stuff from that gerrit is for the entire AOKP as a whole and not device specific.
Can I flash the cm nightly 120 dpi patch or will it break things?
rsalinas1 said:
Can I flash the cm nightly 120 dpi patch or will it break things?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The only "side effect" is that you cannot access the Trebuchet settings and your build.prop values will be different leading to some funky and wrong info in your About Tablet area of your settings.
rohan32 said:
The only "side effect" is that you cannot access the Trebuchet settings and your build.prop values will be different leading to some funky and wrong info in your About Tablet area of your settings.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just changed it under general ui with rom control settings. Thanks though, its very smooth so far.
Anybody else get a System UI has closed error. Weird, hopefully it was a one time thing. Flashing the 4/20 now. Hopefully that fixes it, I did a full wipe and will wipe again
Sent from my aokp_tenderloin using XDA
SUPREME Mods v1.5
Do I need to apply the SUPREME Mods v1.5 after flashing your rom or are they already applied also are you using your XENON kernel
BIGSimon said:
Do I need to apply the SUPREME Mods v1.5 after flashing your rom or are they already applied also are you using your XENON kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would assume that the nighties don't use either of those things.
Nabobalis said:
I would assume that the nighties don't use either of those things.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OK thanks, just asked as both are by rohan32, will try with and without to see if any difference.
BIGSimon said:
Do I need to apply the SUPREME Mods v1.5 after flashing your rom or are they already applied also are you using your XENON kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup you need to reflash the Package and nope its the default Cyanogenmod Kernel.
This build is 100% AOKP "stock", as in its simply compiled from source with no changes.
rohan32 said:
Yup you need to reflash the Package and nope its the default Cyanogenmod Kernel.
This build is 100% AOKP "stock", as in its simply compiled from source with no changes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Supreme mods work fine but the xenon kernel broke my wifi (not had any wifi issues on any build) so back to cyanogen kernel and everything is working
The latest nightly (5/07) fixed my screen off/sound bug. All previous builds of AOKP had a muffled or distorted sound bug that appeared once I dimmed the screen while playing music. Bravo! I believe the fix came from the Classicnerd team, who once again prove they are contributing in remarkable ways. Bravo to them as well!
is this wifi driver included in the nightlys?
http://review.cyanogenmod.com/#/c/15570/
matteebee said:
The latest nightly (5/07) fixed my screen off/sound bug. All previous builds of AOKP had a muffled or distorted sound bug that appeared once I dimmed the screen while playing music. Bravo! I believe the fix came from the Classicnerd team, who once again prove they are contributing in remarkable ways. Bravo to them as well!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tried both the 05/07 and 05/08 AOKP nightlies and the screen off/sound bug is still there just like any other ROM I have tried. Are you sure that you have the volume turned up enough?
can has new build?
Hi there,
I'm trying to build some froyo rom for g1 from source. The problem is that lot of stuff lying here is old, unusable slow or hopelessly broken. The only rom that seems to work is hxxp://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1273549
[Rom][2.2.3 AOSP] DREAMteam Froyo v2.0.0 [9/3/2012]
The kernel source can be easy found by Ezterry
hxxps://github.com/ezterry/kernel-biff-testing/tree/ezgb-2636-v1.5.2-20111106
but I can't find any (git) repo or hint how the "DREAMteam" guys built it. :crying:
Thanks in advance for any hints,
ptau
pm the devs
Sent from my HTC Vision using xda premium
All you need for building the kernel is here at this url:
https://github.com/ezterry/manifest-gingerbread-DS/blob/gingerbread/README.mkdn
It used to be on the ezgingerbread rom thread but seems he has a link to the guide which is now on github ^_^
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
xillius200 said:
All you need for building the kernel is here at this url:
https://github.com/ezterry/manifest-gingerbread-DS/blob/gingerbread/README.mkdn
It used to be on the ezgingerbread rom thread but seems he has a link to the guide which is now on github ^_^
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Building the kernel for froyo or building the ezgingerbread rom is no problem:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=882356
Unfortunately (Ez)gingerbread is an overkill for the tiny G1
My problem is to find out how to build a froyo rom that is not
broken (e.g. cm6). The DREAMteam's
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1273549
rom seems to have the most bugs fixed, but again I don't know
how to build it. I need the right android manifest, git repo, etc.
The DREAMteam changelog is astonishingly sparse:
V2.0.0 - 2012-03-09
Update to android 2.2.3. Some changes from 1.9.2 included.
Thanks ptau
ptau said:
Building the kernel for froyo or building the ezgingerbread rom is no problem:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=882356
Unfortunately (Ez)gingerbread is an overkill for the tiny G1
My problem is to find out how to build a froyo rom that is not
broken (e.g. cm6). The DREAMteam's
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1273549
rom seems to have the most bugs fixed, but again I don't know
how to build it. I need the right android manifest, git repo, etc.
The DREAMteam changelog is astonishingly sparse:
V2.0.0 - 2012-03-09
Update to android 2.2.3. Some changes from 1.9.2 included.
Thanks ptau
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well I got in touch with tval aint spoke to him for a while. He said a repo was never made for DREAMteam froyo and the way in which it was created some by pushing files not everything was coding, there was not much point in a repo and he has not got around to it lol and I totally agree with him. So best thing would be to compile a rom from plain AOSP and begin to modify it yourself, this way you learn and better understand rom creation. Plus doing it straight from AOSP will give you the updates you want and in most ways will actually be better ^^ If you want any help I could always introduce you to a few devs see if they would be willing to help ^^
PS: From how you worded your first post it sounded like you were trying to compile just the ezterry kernel xD so I apologise that I misunderstood ^^
99%
xillius200 said:
As far as I remember when it was first started they never had a repository and unless it has changed they still do not lol ill email tvall later lol seems Ldrifta is gone.... :'( if not you can always just compile a normal aosp and then customize it to your liking and speed helps you learn on how to speed up roms that way unlike having an already fast rom of which you learn less from.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks. After I looked in the zip, I thought something like that.
Seriously, you don't need speed with this hardware.
Think of cheap, stable, not battery eating
and hackable ARM11 development platform
After that incident with kernel.org they removed all the old android repos
so I have hard times to find the G1 pieces again. ezterry rocks. The kernel
changes are in his git, I could tweak+build the kernel with all the
modules I needed.
Let's see how to get the aosp together ...
(any hints greatly appreciated
PS: From how you worded your first post it sounded like you were trying to compile just the ezterry kernel xD so I apologise that I misunderstood ^^
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know, but my German is much better, I swear :angel:
Well.. I'd be happy to help rebuild my rom. Been wanting to set up a repo, but I'm lazy..
tvall said:
Well.. I'd be happy to help rebuild my rom. Been wanting to set up a repo, but I'm lazy..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the email with tips.
I try to document the building process here:
hxxps://sites.google.com/site/aospdream/
As always, any hints or help from anybody are greatly appreciated ...
Thanks,
ptau
Hi
I am trying to put together a really good 2.6.35 kernel so we can have a stable CyanogenMod 7.2. I am using TomGiordanos source here:
https://github.com/TomGiordano/kernel_huawei.git
and building off the 2.6.35-ICS branch using the .config from the b5xx kernel here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1653699
I got the source to compile and it all seems to work quite smoothly. It has a couple of issues though. Biggest is that the wifi just gives an error when trying to turn it on. Next is that the key brightness does not work, but I think I know where the problem is with that. Any help to get the wifi going would be awesome for a start though.
PaulMilbank said:
Hi
I am trying to put together a really good 2.6.35 kernel so we can have a stable CyanogenMod 7.2. I am using TomGiordanos source here:
https://github.com/TomGiordano/kernel_huawei.git
and building off the 2.6.35-ICS branch using the .config from the b5xx kernel here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1653699
I got the source to compile and it all seems to work quite smoothly. It has a couple of issues though. Biggest is that the wifi just gives an error when trying to turn it on. Next is that the key brightness does not work, but I think I know where the problem is with that. Any help to get the wifi going would be awesome for a start though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here you can find some changes from Bukington. Has the same base from TomG.
demolition23 said:
Here you can find some changes from Bukington. Has the same base from TomG.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Buckington is pushing to the TomG source repo. Wireless is fixed if I build against their cyanogenmod_u8800_defconfig instead of the config from forumbers kernel he found. HDCRJacob had made a commit which forced the wifi to enable in the cyanogenmod defconfig and another file.
Now we have other problems like camera, light sensors and maybe some other stuff if I use their defconfig. Kernel building is fun...
See here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1891281
Hi friends. Can you check this kernel source's is real or useless?
https://github.com/nofearnohappy/android_vendor_xiaomi_hermes
https://github.com/lbule/android_device_xiaomi_hermes
This isn't a kernel source, it's a device tree for build CyanogenMod
~ Xiaomi Redmi Note 2 Prime ~
SkiFire13 said:
This isn't a kernel source, it's a device tree for build CyanogenMod
~ Xiaomi Redmi Note 2 Prime ~
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ho great so cyanogenmod is comming?
tailslol said:
ho great so cyanogenmod is comming?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We will see, it is very hard to port when kernel is not given. There are people working on it and doing a very good job!
Sadly, the complete kernel (custom kernel with drivers) was leaked for a short period and a few devs have it.. but they are afraid to use or publish it because they don't want to be sued.
tailslol said:
ho great so cyanogenmod is comming?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For now someone built it but it's very unstable
~ Xiaomi Redmi Note 2 Prime ~
Sad news about this device's kernel source.
is this usefull?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/cro...al/marshmallow-source-codes-mediatek-t3218602
chris5932 said:
We will see, it is very hard to port when kernel is not given. There are people working on it and doing a very good job!
Sadly, the complete kernel (custom kernel with drivers) was leaked for a short period and a few devs have it.. but they are afraid to use or publish it because they don't want to be sued.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow didnt know that, really the full source kernel was leaked??? And some devs have it D:?. If its true i hope they decide one day to make a nice ROM build, i guess everyone of us would wait for that
chris5932 said:
We will see, it is very hard to port when kernel is not given. There are people working on it and doing a very good job!
Sadly, the complete kernel (custom kernel with drivers) was leaked for a short period and a few devs have it.. but they are afraid to use or publish it because they don't want to be sued.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sued? The ones to be sued are mediatek and/or xiaomi for not complying gpl license
adaltavo said:
Wow didnt know that, really the full source kernel was leaked??? And some devs have it D:?. If its true i hope they decide one day to make a nice ROM build, i guess everyone of us would wait for that
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
At least someone has it.. I am not so sure on how many have it. Don't be too excited yet, we might not get it (soon). The source can not just be published to the public, the one who does will face some problems.. (see what happened to incomplete source).
chris5932 said:
At least someone has it.. I am not so sure on how many have it. Don't be too excited yet, we might not get it (soon). The source can not just be published to the public, the one who does will face some problems.. (see what happened to incomplete source).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
May i ask what happened?. And i know is not that easy, what i meant is that he (or they) could make a nice ROM build with that source, maybe as an anonymus guy or something like that, is not necesary to publish full source code. Our another hope is wait for MTK to release it , but it wont be soon, even could never happen
adaltavo said:
May i ask what happened?. And i know is not that easy, what i meant is that he (or they) could make a nice ROM build with that source, maybe as an anonymus guy or something like that, is not necesary to publish full source code. Our another hope is wait for MTK to release it , but it wont be soon, even could never happen
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We can build roms ourselfs, just need proper kernel. Just let me say that much: I have a reliable source that told me someone has it. I don't think (anymore) it was leaked to the public ever, all kernel leaked on git were incomplete.
All kernel sources I've seen for X10 are not for our device. Another thing is the AOSP sources are very buggy and unfinished.
I finally made progress on my AOSP 5.1 and fixed the slow app launch (maybe you've seen one youtube video posted here - this is my build).
Unfortunately I don't have kernel source for Redmi Note 2 and it is impossible to build a custom kernel, so I'm trying to finish the ROM and will use prebuilt kernel.
If you think it is easy as porting, then you're wrong. Compiling something from source and fixing all bugs is completely different animal.
CM 12.1 also booted, but a lot of work needs to be done there too.
https://github.com/omlet05/MediaTek-HelioX10-Kernel
yay?
tailslol said:
https://github.com/omlet05/MediaTek-HelioX10-Kernel
yay?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Check the date and please stop posting same thing again and again. This is the original broken half source that was leaked over 2 months ago now.
I.nfraR.ed said:
All kernel sources I've seen for X10 are not for our device. Another thing is the AOSP sources are very buggy and unfinished.
I finally made progress on my AOSP 5.1 and fixed the slow app launch (maybe you've seen one youtube video posted here - this is my build).
Unfortunately I don't have kernel source for Redmi Note 2 and it is impossible to build a custom kernel, so I'm trying to finish the ROM and will use prebuilt kernel.
If you think it is easy as porting, then you're wrong. Compiling something from source and fixing all bugs is completely different animal.
CM 12.1 also booted, but a lot of work needs to be done there too.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What is time to wake? On miui time is long :/ On our last phone (A820) time to wake is much better.
How aboute "tap to wake"? What is result on antutu? When you publish rom?
AOSP boots up and works faster than MIUI and also has much much better ram management, although it would be good if we could make a custom kernel.
Tap to wake normally needs to be supported in kernel, so the answer is "no".
Antutu score is irrelevant, but normally I get about 48K with the basic model. I've seen higher, seen lower.
It also depends on kernel.
Don't forget that for A820 I have a custom optimized kernel.
Hello
When you share rom? How to progress?
Known XDA rule, don't ask for ETA He'll tell us when ready
bumcykcyk said:
Hello
When you share rom? How to progress?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It will be shared when it is done.. Ussd/BT working but camera still doesnt