Benchmarks: new Exynos 5 Dual beats Apple’s A6 chip
http://www.androidauthority.com/exynos-5-dual-benchmarks-125134/
yoniinfante said:
Benchmarks: new Exynos 5 Dual beats Apple’s A6 chip
http://www.androidauthority.com/exynos-5-dual-benchmarks-125134/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wait til one of these goes in the GS4. However; Apple will have the A7 by then so..
CrApple is nothing without Sammy bro!!!
My Note II beats those A6 benchmark scores too, so it's not all that shocking really apart from the dual core bit!
How does it compare to the note 2?
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda app-developers app
those apple processors dont have a lot of performance anyway, but they work very good with the operating system, thats the reason they're quite good in benchmarks.
Apocaliptica said:
those apple processors dont have a lot of performance anyway, but they work very good with the operating system, thats the reason they're quite good in benchmarks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
iOS is very well optimized for their CPU/SoCs because well, there's 1 new one a year as opposed to Android which has to work with Exynos, Snapdragon, Sony's chips, Intel's and TI's OMAP...
Not to mention, Apple pretty much has the crown when it comes to GPU performance... which in my mind is the more important thing... Quad core is all good and stuff, but like your PC, the bottleneck is usually your GPU.
I wonder how it will do against the A6X in the fourth gen iPad?
---------- Post added at 07:03 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:01 PM ----------
achusaysblessyou said:
iOS is very well optimized for their CPU/SoCs because well, there's 1 new one a year as opposed to Android which has to work with Exynos, Snapdragon, Sony's chips, Intel's and TI's OMAP...
Not to mention, Apple pretty much has the crown when it comes to GPU performance... which in my mind is the more important thing... Quad core is all good and stuff, but like your PC, the bottleneck is usually your GPU.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I don't know why any Android OEM's dont use the same PowerVR chips Apple does? Apple has exclusivity maybe?
Exynos 5450 anyone for Note 3?
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda app-developers app
yeah i hope we get Quad 5450 A15 @ 2Ghz next year with 3 or 4GB ram sweet
My Note 2 is faster than my notebook lol
Livebyte said:
Exynos 5450 anyone for Note 3?
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
More like 5250 of S4 plus 200mhz
mr mystery said:
Wait til one of these goes in the GS4. However; Apple will have the A7 by then so..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nah, not A7 till at least a year from now.
cool
COOL !!!!!
GS4 may be 1.5 or 2GB RAM
Related
Which is the best processor of these?
i) Snapdragon
ii)ARM Cortex A8
Most likely the Arm because of its gaming score and all that animation stuff. The snapdragon is a beast at CPU speed though. So I guess its opinion of what u want?
Sent from my X10i using XDA Premium App
Snap dragon = ARM CORTEX A7
OmegaRED^ said:
Snap dragon = ARM CORTEX A7
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's not correct at all
OmegaRED^ said:
Snap dragon = ARM CORTEX A7
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not at all...
Sent from my X10i using XDA Premium App
Snapdragon all the way!! as its pretty much similar to Cortex-A8, but has better performance altogether
Complicated question....
Which coretex A8 are you taking about? The one in the sgs or droid? And which snapdragon? Depending on the generation/series of chip they are pretty similar.
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
tomh235 said:
Complicated question....
Which coretex A8 are you taking about? The one in the sgs or droid? And which snapdragon? Depending on the generation/series of chip they are pretty similar.
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
x10i and galaxy s processor
The adreno gpu in snapdragon is a dog. The cortex power vr ones are far better. As far as the CPU, it's much the muchness...
Sent from my Atari 600XL using cassette tape and a stamp.
Consolation summed it up perfectly!
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
Core i7 and the top model of that series.
So far the most power i have seen in a mobile phone cpu and gpu...
Dualcore cpu. Nvidia tegra2 gpu.
That little tegra chip is severely aggressive.
I love the way it can stream several sources of video at the same time.
Plus the ability for dual view... on a phone.. A phone!
Too awesome.
Nvidia Tegra
changamangaliay said:
Nvidia Tegra
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
tegra isn't the cpu, tegra is a dual core cortex a9
these votes make me laugh, the cortex is a much better processor. Hence why androids technology is going towards cortex currently...
The qualcomm stuff is getting outdated quick.
Buying a phone with a qualcomm processor now would be a huge mistake imo
fiscidtox said:
these votes make me laugh, the cortex is a much better processor. Hence why androids technology is going towards cortex currently...
The qualcomm stuff is getting outdated quick.
Buying a phone with a qualcomm processor now would be a huge mistake imo
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Depends on which qualcoms you are talking about. The one in arc is outdated. The new ones are right up there.
realunited123 said:
Depends on which qualcoms you are talking about. The one in arc is outdated. The new ones are right up there.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Many/most newer phones are going to be cortex-based (tegra 2 specifically) due to the better graphical performance for games, etc...
fiscidtox said:
Many/most newer phones are going to be cortex-based (tegra 2 specifically) due to the better graphical performance for games, etc...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's true.. tegra2 FTW
fiscidtox said:
these votes make me laugh, the cortex is a much better processor. Hence why androids technology is going towards cortex currently...
The qualcomm stuff is getting outdated quick.
Buying a phone with a qualcomm processor now would be a huge mistake imo
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Snapdragon = a8 CPU. BUT, the GPU is much crappier. However, if you have a device without a very high Res screen and you don't play games, you won't notice the difference.
Sent from my Atari 600XL using cassette tape and a stamp.
consolation said:
Snapdragon = a8 CPU. BUT, the GPU is much crappier. However, if you have a device without a very high Res screen and you don't play games, you won't notice the difference.
Sent from my Atari 600XL using cassette tape and a stamp.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol that isn't true at all. a snapdragon is not a cortex a8.....
Snapdragon is made by qualcomm.....
Well look like Apple is first to market with A15 Cores.
I really didnt want to see this tbh since A15 was possibly worst thing that we could have seen in Android v Apple
Those cores will wipe the floor with anything A9 based even if its just a dual core CPU.
Bummer.
Samsung would have seen this coming since they are the fab for Apple.
I wonder if Samsung will respond with an A15 2GB ram S3 variant.
irzero said:
Well look like Apple is first to market with A15 Cores.
I really didnt want to see this tbh since A15 was possibly worst thing that we could have seen in Android v Apple
Those cores will wipe the floor with anything A9 based even if its just a dual core CPU.
Bummer.
Samsung would have seen this coming since they are the fab for Apple.
I wonder if Samsung will respond with an A15 2GB ram S3 variant.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm they stated A15?
Snapdragon S4. A-15. I rest my case.
"It's all in the game yo, all in the game..." - Omar Little
tanjiajun_34 said:
Hmm they stated A15?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes. Anandtech blogged it.
Its basically twice as fast as the A9 in the 4S.
Yes, but there is already an A-15 on the market, in the American S3.
This is nothing new.
"It's all in the game yo, all in the game..." - Omar Little
irzero said:
Well look like Apple is first to market with A15 Cores.
I really didnt want to see this tbh since A15 was possibly worst thing that we could have seen in Android v Apple
Those cores will wipe the floor with anything A9 based even if its just a dual core CPU.
Bummer.
Samsung would have seen this coming since they are the fab for Apple.
I wonder if Samsung will respond with an A15 2GB ram S3 variant.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why bummer? It's normal for Apple, they release one phone, once a year they have to give it everything they got. Just get ready for the onslaught of android devices coming this fall including the next nexus.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
irzero said:
Yes. Anandtech blogged it.
Its basically twice as fast as the A9 in the 4S.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm engadget miss out? Anyway its a dual core so there is hopes than S3 processor can be on par with it....
nodstuff said:
Yes, but there is already an A-15 on the market, in the American S3.
This is nothing new.
"It's all in the game yo, all in the game..." - Omar Little
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Stop calling Krait a A15 core, it is not.
tanjiajun_34 said:
Hmm they stated A15?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm reading A6 from verge
A15????
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
skibadee said:
I'm reading A6 from verge
A15????
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cortex-A15 Processor
http://www.arm.com/products/processors/cortex-a/cortex-a15.php
skibadee said:
I'm reading A6 from verge
A15????
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The A6 is an Apple name.
the A15 are the cores used. Next Gen ARM design is seriously more advanced than A9 based CPU
Has this been officially confirmed? Not seen it anywhere else but anandtech thus far.
tanjiajun_34 said:
Hmm engadget miss out? Anyway its a dual core so there is hopes than S3 processor can be on par with it....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It wont be.
AndreiLux said:
Stop calling Krait a A15 core, it is not.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's based on Arms A15 design is it not? OEMs can make alterations as they see fit as Arm just supply the design and don't actually provide working silicon.
Only iTards use semantics to pretend their stuff is first when others have been doing it months.
kitch9 said:
It's based on Arms A15 design is it not? OEMs can make alterations as they see fit as Arm just supply the design and don't actually provide working silicon.
Only iTards use semantics to pretend their stuff is first when others have been doing it months.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its halfway between A9 an A15 by the looks of it.
A15 is seriously more advanced. It is a "Next Gen" Mobile CPU architecture.
AndreiLux said:
Stop calling Krait a A15 core, it is not.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
irzero said:
Its halfway between A9 an A15 by the looks of it.
A15 is seriously more advanced. It is a "Next Gen" Mobile CPU architecture.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Qualcomm design their own chips, but ARM provide the specs and instruction sets... Performance will be closer than a lot think for the cpu the gpu in the S4 isn't the best, but that is due to be upgraded.
kitch9 said:
Qualcomm design their own chips, but ARM provide the specs and instruction sets... Performance will be closer than a lot think for the cpu the gpu in the S4 isn't the best, but that is due to be upgraded.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you check the specs of the A15 there are some things way higher specced in the A15 over the S4
Let's keep this section on par with Android/Samsung GSIII please. :highfive:
I realize no ones gotten a retail unit yet but how does everyone feel about the phone not having a truly next gen chip? Cortex A15 would've been boss battery wise. Chime in
Sent from my Nexus S using xda app-developers app
nexom said:
I realize no ones gotten a retail unit yet but how does everyone feel about the phone not having a truly next gen chip? Cortex A15 would've been boss battery wise. Chime in
Sent from my Nexus S using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is based on A15,
http://androidheadlines.com/2012/09...pro-is-the-best-chip-out-there-heres-why.html
The Snapdragon S4 Pro from Qualcomm is coming to market with power in all the right places, for one, it’s running 4 cores at 1.5Ghz and when these cores are Cortex-A15 cores then you know this thing is going to be crazy fast.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
chrisjcks said:
It is based on A15,
http://androidheadlines.com/2012/09...pro-is-the-best-chip-out-there-heres-why.html
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That website is false. S4 pro's are based on Krait processors which merely have some architectural similarities to the A15.
Kraits are much better than A9's butThe A15 pretty much blows the Kraits to smithereens.
Having said that - and putting aside heat/throttling issues - The Quad Krait + Adreno 320 combo is quite a bit better than anything out there, enough to be termed "next gen" IMO.
omersak said:
That website is false. S4 pro's are based on Krait processors which merely have some architectural similarities to the A15.
Kraits are much better than A9's butThe A15 pretty much blows the Kraits to smithereens.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its still based off a15, they have just adapted it.
Just likes apples dual core A6 processor, its a15 but adapted by apple to their needs.
So whilst they ain't true a15 based processors, both the s4pro and A6 are still based on
A15 architecture. (but adapted......)
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
chrisjcks said:
Its still based off a15, they have just adapted it.
Just likes apples dual core A6 processor, its a15 but adapted by apple to their needs.
So whilst they ain't true a15 based processors, both the s4pro and A6 are still based on
A15 architecture. (but adapted......)
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No
10chars
I'd rather they work on heat and batteries before SoC's...
omersak said:
That website is false. S4 pro's are based on Krait processors which merely have some architectural similarities to the A15.
Kraits are much better than A9's butThe A15 pretty much blows the Kraits to smithereens.
Having said that - and putting aside heat/throttling issues - The Quad Krait + Adreno 320 combo is quite a bit better than anything out there, enough to be termed "next gen" IMO.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
chrisjcks said:
Its still based off a15, they have just adapted it.
Just likes apples dual core A6 processor, its a15 but adapted by apple to their needs.
So whilst they ain't true a15 based processors, both the s4pro and A6 are still based on
A15 architecture. (but adapted......)
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A better way to look at it is that the Krait (S4 Pro) and Cortex-A15 processors are both based on the same architecture, which is ARMv7. Neither one is anything completely new, since many of the latest SoC's have built around ARMv7, but neither one has made the next step up to v8.
In general I would say that the Cortex series are better than the S series spec-wise. For example, Krait has an smaller pipeline (11 vs 15) and half the cache of the A15 (16kB + 16 kB L1, 2mB L2 vs 32 kB + 32 kB L1, 4 mB L2), but a larger pipeline and cache don't always make something better.
I think its fair to say that the Krait is like A15's little brother. Maybe not as powerful, but from the same powerful family.
Ryukeima said:
A better way to look at it is that the Krait (S4 Pro) and Cortex-A15 processors are both based on the same architecture, which is ARMv7. Neither one is anything completely new, since many of the latest SoC's have built around ARMv7, but neither one has made the next step up to v8.
In general I would say that the Cortex series are better than the S series spec-wise. For example, Krait has an smaller pipeline (11 vs 15) and half the cache of the A15 (16kB + 16 kB L1, 2mB L2 vs 32 kB + 32 kB L1, 4 mB L2), but a larger pipeline and cache don't always make something better.
I think its fair to say that the Krait is like A15's little brother. Maybe not as powerful, but from the same powerful family.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, that's what I was saying.
But the OP is saying its not next gen, yet this is the most powerfull mobile cpu/gpu available for Google.....
What else could you ask for?
True a15 based cpus won't be entering phones for about 6 months, right?
Delay the nexus till then?
LOL
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
This Chrisjcks guy is easily the biggest/most annoying Google fanboy on this site. How about keeping your mouth shut when you don't understand something? Go visit Mountainview, and tell them how much you love them instead of spewing your ignorance here please.
InvalidUsername said:
This Chrisjcks guy is easily the biggest/most annoying Google fanboy on this site. How about keeping your mouth shut when you don't understand something? Go visit Mountainview, and tell them how much you love them instead of spewing your ignorance here please.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
PMSL
Your still bitter because everyone told you what a retard you were for wanting to buy a phone you don't like.
You come on here, *****ing and moaning about the Nexus 4 and all the things you hate about it - yet you say you 'have to' buy one because you already sold your galaxy nexus.
Who in their right mind, would not only sell their device for a phone they don't like, but then also moan about it on a forum and STILL go ahead and buy it.
You-are-seriously-retarded.
Ill say it again, XDA is not a forum for you to troll, ***** and moan about a device.
Go cry elsewhere.
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
chrisjcks said:
PMSL
Your still bitter because everyone told you what a retard you were for wanting to buy a phone you don't like.
You come on here, *****ing and moaning about the Nexus 4 and all the things you hate about it - yet you say you 'have to' buy one because you already sold your galaxy nexus.
Who in their right mind, would not only sell their device for a phone they don't like, but then also moan about it on a forum and STILL go ahead and buy it.
You-are-seriously-retarded.
Ill say it again, XDA is not a forum for you to troll, ***** and moan about a device.
Go cry elsewhere.
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not once did I say that I "hate" this device. I'm just not as ignorant and oblivious to its flaws as a fanboy like yourself. I love this phone, and I can't wait to get it, but I'm openly willing to talk about its problems Fanboys ---------->
Will you two please cut it out this is no place for your bickering.
Thank you
Nexus 4 is still a significant improvement over the Gnex. I've enjoyed my Gnex but plan to purchase the Nexus 4. Hardware is improved and the price is right. Time will tell if the battery life is a major issue (I did upgrade my Gnex battery to 2000mah). The nexus line is a developers phone and is not intended to blow the doors off the competition.
What do you all think?
CES: Samsung unveils an eight-core Exynos 5 smartphone chip
Hints at a superfast Samsung Galaxy S4 / Note 3
LAS VEGAS: KOREAN HARDWARE MAKER Samsung unveiled its eight-core Octa Exynos 5 processor at CES on Wednesday, which is likely to feature in its Galaxy S4 smartphone.
Making up for its lack of high profile announcements at this year's Las Vegas consumer electronics show today, Samsung unwrapped the eight-core chip designed for use in smartphones and tablets.
Samsung said that the Octa Exynos 5 chip is much faster than its previous processors including the Exynos 4, and boasts much lower power consumption. That's because the chip is split into two sets of quad-core processors that both use ARM's new Big.little processor technology, pairing an energy efficient ARM Cortex A7 chip with a more powerful Cortex A15 multicore chip.
According to Samsung, the chip is faster than its Exynos 5 dual-core chip that features in the Google Nexus 10 - presently the fastest Android handset available on the market today, and claims it will bring a new level of processing power to mobile devices. It said that this chip will also bring a much more impressive gaming experience to its next generation mobile products, and will easily handle HD media streaming.
That's not to say your next Samsung smartphone will have poor battery life though, as Samsung claimed the eight-core processor is up to 70 percent more energy efficient than its previous Exynos chips.
There's no word yet on when Samsung's eight-core Exynos 5 processor will start shipping, but we'll be very surprised if it doesn't appear in the firm's next generation Galaxy flagship smartphone. We're likely to hear more at the Mobile World Congress show in Barcelona next month.
The Inquirer (http://s.tt/1ydw8)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh, you got octacore CPU and android still has to lag huehuehue
Optimization trouble
Отправлено с моего GT-N7100 через Tapatalk
bkjugg said:
Oh, you got octacore CPU and android still has to lag huehuehue
Optimization trouble
Отправлено с моего GT-N7100 через Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Android does not lag one bit on Nexus 4 running AOSP!
But this is actually a Dual-Quad core with a powerful Quad Core Cortex A15 combined with Quad Core Battery efficient Cortex A7 and the cores get switched in terms of workload so it can save battery more that normal Quad Core processors.
8 cores sammy's killing it
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda premium
We will always love our quad-core Note II.
Sent from Samsung Galaxy Note II
It's gonna freaking rape the battery
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda app-developers app
UtkarshGupta said:
It's gonna freaking rape the battery
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
probably an 4000mAh+ battery
UtkarshGupta said:
It's gonna freaking rape the battery
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't be sure.
It has 4 low-power Cortex A7 cores to handle easy missions and save battery. Especially when screen is off.
Check out Tegra 3, only the 5th core is working when screen is off, and the battery barely goes down!!
system.img said:
Android does not lag one bit on Nexus 4 running AOSP!
But this is actually a Dual-Quad core with a powerful Quad Core Cortex A15 combined with Quad Core Battery efficient Cortex A7 and the cores get switched in terms of workload so it can save battery more that normal Quad Core processors.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah but. Too many CPU, GPU etc., you need to adapt appz for it, you have sooo powerful hardware and you still can't use it properly. And we have tons of appz like Seeder to reduce lagz lol. I dont know appz which have adapt for quadcore except benchmarkz (ohh I can't undesrstand ppl who are using it) and gamez, but ROFL, simple Tapatalk doesnt have a smooth scrolling if you watch >20 topics.
Its a very huge disadvantage
IMHO.
sent from my Note II using Tapatalk
Talk about Jelly Bean's in-built support for Hardware Acceleration, lol
bkjugg said:
Oh, you got octacore CPU and android still has to lag huehuehue
Optimization trouble
Отправлено с моего GT-N7100 через Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have an s3 and an iphone 4s. Guess which one lags?
s3 is the fastest smoothest phone/computing device I've ever used. period.
-------------------------------------
Sent via something that can't finish it's sentan...
---------- Post added at 05:51 AM ---------- Previous post was at 05:47 AM ----------
I hope this has 3 modes
low power- 4 low power cores
high power- 4 high octane cores chomp away at tasks
balls to the wall-all 8 cores throw their testosterone at everything you a nb d the devs try and run, making mincemeat of the most powerhungry intense game or all liked it was running tetris lol can you imagine wielding such mobile processing power??
-------------------------------------
Sent via something that can't finish it's sentan...
It's power will be utilized when Ubuntu for Android!
Sent from Samsung Galaxy Note II
for those who dont know, here are some of the interesting facts.
* The Octa-core CPU has 8 Cores, 4 A15 cores and 4 A7 cores
* The A15 cores are tuned to perform better by sacrificing battery life, and A7 core is tuned to be more efficient while sacrificing performance
* Even though the A7 is less powerful than A15, it is more powerful than the Cortex A8 cpu found in last generation phones. Still it uses almost 1/10 the power of Cortex A8
* Exynos 5 can operate in two modes. big.Little and big.LITTLE MP mode.
* In normal big.LITTLE mode, only 4 cores (or less) will be active at a time. The OS will not be aware of the Low power cores (just like in Tegra 3)
* In big.LITTLE MP mode, the OS knows that the CPU have 8 cores. It can use all 8 cores at once if there is demand for it. (My understanding is that android will not support this mode as of now)
People need to realise something.
Samsung could make a processor with 100 a15s for the gs4. It wouldn't effect the battery a bit unless the software was configured that way.
Almost everything on a processor is now power gated in the silicone, meaning it can be switched on off at will. A power gated section literally draws ZERO power.
So 100 cores would make no difference if only 2 of them were ever really used. It's just the amount of money Samsung want to spend on the silicone (smaller chips have higher yields since there's less chance of defects affecting the chip).
The die size (the amount of silicone used) for the A7 is tiny. Depending on how smart Samsung is (and how much coffee we can feed to devs like Gokan and AndreiLux ) , we could be looking at a powerful, highly efficient chip. Considering we're also looking at shrinking from 32nm to 28nm for this the A15s themselves might not even draw too much juice. Arm said A15s would be sensible for smart phone use at good 28nm or normal 22nm production. And Samsung production right now is very 'good'
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda premium
Will note 3 and s4 feature this 8 core processor?
Most likely, yes. This was long over-due. The next big thing is probably already in development. If you have a Note 2 and you want to upgrade, wait for next year. The Note 2 is powerful enough and has excellent battery life, a very important factor to consider in today's mobile market.
sohebq said:
Will note 3 and s4 feature this 8 core processor?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
winlinmac001 said:
Most likely, yes. This was long over-due. The next big thing is probably already in development. If you have a Note 2 and you want to upgrade, wait for next year. The Note 2 is powerful enough and has excellent battery life, a very important factor to consider in today's mobile market.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If this was th3 case, I would've stayed with s1. Actually I m love with samsung, I used every galaxy s and note series so I will update
sent from: The New S-Pen
I was going to wait for the s5 to upgrade but if the s4 had this chip then it's defo worth the upgrade from s3
-------------------------------------
Sent via something that can't finish it's sentan...
This is Samsung's strategy in luring customers to buying a new device every year. The Exynos 5 chipset was made well over a year ago but wasn't employed in last years models. Guess what? Exynos 6 is already in development. Lol. :silly:
dodgebizkit said:
I was going to wait for the s5 to upgrade but if the s4 had this chip then it's defo worth the upgrade from s3
-------------------------------------
Sent via something that can't finish it's sentan...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All that power and no apps to utilize it. All those power and bad UI to go along with it. What wasted potential. Maybe in two year's time devs will start utilizing quad core processors and 16 cores will be the flagship standard. It's a shame Android is so fragmented.
I am planning to buy S4
But I'm not sure which is better
Snapdragon 600
1.9 Ghz
Quad Core Krait 300.
or
Exynos5
1.6 Ghz Octal Core
Quad Core Cortex A15 / Quad Core A7
4g and installing roms is not important to me
Which is better in terms of performance? less lag ?
Which is better for gaming?
Yet another thread
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xo7nJQzfWsE&feature=youtube_gdata_player
Look at that review and make your mind up
~ Taylor_Swift
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Note II GT-N7100 using XDA Premium HD
................
an9093 said:
I am planning to buy S4
But I'm not sure which is better
Snapdragon 600
1.9 Ghz
Quad Core Krait 300.
or
Exynos5
1.6 Ghz Octal Core
Quad Core Cortex A15 / Quad Core A7
4g and installing roms is not important to me
Which is better in terms of performance? less lag ?
Which is better for gaming?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi,
Look HERE
That's a no brainer....the Exy. But does anyone really have a choice? Especially in America.
i have a choice they both are available the same price with local warrenty
The exynos here is cheaper online but for me, no 4G = no go. Since buying an S3 4G last year there is no way I can go back to 3G again.
The speed difference is enormous and 4G here costs no more than 3G. And on the Telstra network it's even better. Have hit over 50mbps on speed tests.
Sent from my GT-I9505 using xda premium
dman777 said:
That's a no brainer....the Exy.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Except it really isn't.
Sent from my Qualcomm Galaxy S4
Over simplifying it the Octacore version is slightly faster but has a poorer battery (4G not withstanding). Snapdragon touch slower (but faster than most phones todsy) but it'll last longer. There are lots of debates on whether the Octacore version ca be improved but this is how it stands right now as the biggest differences.
Other option is Stock version......
-Airax
Pagnell said:
Except it really isn't.
Sent from my Qualcomm Galaxy S4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, in this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZeRcKHF4bDc&feature=youtu.be&a the girl states that she can not tell a difference between the two....except in GPU power. So, if you like to have less GPU power...then yes, the Qualcomm would be what you want.
dman777 said:
Well, in this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZeRcKHF4bDc&feature=youtu.be&a the girl states that she can not tell a difference between the two....except in GPU power. So, if you like to have less GPU power...then yes, the Qualcomm would be what you want.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You have that a little backwards: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=40554113
Also, go and ask any cedarview Atom owners what they think of the PowerVR SGX54x and the driver 'support' it gets. After that fiasco I would never buy another product that has a GPU from Imagination Technologies.
XTCrefugee said:
You have that a little backwards: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=40554113
Also, go and ask any cedarview Atom owners what they think of the PowerVR SGX54x and the driver 'support' it gets. After that fiasco I would never buy another product that has a GPU from Imagination Technologies.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is interesting. But seeing for myself in that video, it is hard not to believe that the Exy GPU is better.
dman777 said:
Well, in this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZeRcKHF4bDc&feature=youtu.be&a the girl states that she can not tell a difference between the two....except in GPU power. So, if you like to have less GPU power...then yes, the Qualcomm would be what you want.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm still waiting to see what makes the Exynos version a 'no brainer'. Was that it?
Sent from my Qualcomm Galaxy S4
Pagnell said:
I'm still waiting to see what makes the Exynos version a 'no brainer'. Was that it?
Sent from my Qualcomm Galaxy S4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure, no problem....It was "Exynos takes the edge, ie camera and GPU". You can also watch the video and see...physical proof is nice.
I see. So for someone who needs 4G and has a preference for CM or AOKP the Exynos is still a 'no brainer' simply because it's performance is slightly better on certain benchmarks?
Sent from my Qualcomm Galaxy S4
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
????????????
Why are you saying Exynos GPU is better than S600? I saw benchmarks where the Adreno 320 beat the powerVR SGX544 (though benchmarks are sometimes useless ^^)
Exynooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooos
ive seen many vids on youtube about the two devices and i gotta say there not a big diffrenet in perfrmance
just get the one that available in your country