Database Users

Eris Benchmarking using Quadrant...how do some of you get such high benchmarks

I am using Kaos Froyo, 35-1. I have stagefright's enabled to true, I have autokiller set to aggresive.
My device is at 389, above the Moto Droid, and below the SE Experie X10i, HTC Desire, Nexus One, Galaxy 5, Droid X, and Nexus One 2.2+. The Nexus One 2.2+ is around 1,300.
Here is my current build.prop file. I am overclocked to 710 btw. Any clue what I can do to improve performance?
Build.Prop file:
# begin build properties
ro.build.display.id=KaosFroyo V35-1
ro.build.description=KaosFroyo V35-1
ro.modversion=KaosFroyo V35-1
ro.build.version.incremental=eng.kaos-built-this.01
ro.build.version.sdk=8
ro.build.version.codename=REL
ro.build.version.release=2.2
ro.build.date=Fri Jul 2 17:25:10 CDT 2010
ro.build.date.utc=1278109510
ro.build.type=eng
ro.build.user=kaos
ro.build.host=Kaos
ro.build.tags=test-keys
ro.product.model=FroyoEris
ro.product.brand=verizon
ro.product.board=desirec
ro.product.cpu.abi=armeabi
ro.product.manufacturer=HTC
ro.product.locale.language=en
ro.product.locale.region=US
ro.wifi.channels=
ro.board.platform=msm7k
# ro.build.product is obsolete; use ro.product.device
ro.build.device=desirec
ro.product.name=opal
ro.product.device=sapphire
# Do not try to parse ro.build.description or .fingerprint
ro.build.fingerprint=google/passion/passion/mahimahi:2.2/FRG33/48579:user/release-keys
# end build properties
#
# ADDITIONAL_BUILD_PROPERTIES
#
ro.telephony.default_network=4
rild.libpath=/system/lib/libhtc_ril.so
wifi.interface=tiwlan0
wifi.supplicant_scan_interval=180
ro.sf.lcd_density=140
ro.telephony.default_network=4
keyguard.no_require_sim=true
ro.com.android.dateformat=MM-dd-yyyy
ro.com.android.dataroaming=true
ro.config.notification_sound=pixiedust.ogg
ro.config.alarm_alert=Alarm_Beep_03.ogg
media.stagefright.enable-player=true
media.stagefright.enable-meta=true
media.stagefright.enable-scan=true
media.stagefright.enable-http=true
ro.com.android.wifi-watchlist=GoogleGuest
ro.error.receiver.system.apps=com.google.android.feedback
ro.setupwizard.enterprise_mode=1
ro.com.google.clientidbase=android-verizon
ro.com.google.locationfeatures=1
ro.url.legal=http://www.google.com/intl/%s/mobile/android/basic/phone-legal.html
ro.url.legal.android_privacy=http://www.google.com/intl/%s/mobile/android/basic/privacy.html
ro.cdma.home.operator.numeric=310012
ro.cdma.home.operator.alpha=Verizon
ro.cdma.homesystem=128,64
ro.cdma.data_retry_config=default_randomization=960000,960000,960000,960000,960000
ro.config.vc_call_vol_steps=7
ro.telephony.call_ring.multiple=false
ro.telephony.call_ring.delay=2000
ro.setupwizard.enable_bypass=1
ro.media.dec.jpeg.memcap=20000000
dalvik.vm.lockprof.threshold=500
dalvik.vm.dexopt-flags=m=y
ro.config.ringtone=DonMessWivIt.ogg
ro.rommanager.developerid=cyanogenmod
ro.url.legal=http://www.google.com/intl/%s/mobile/android/basic/phone-legal.html
ro.url.legal.android_privacy=http://www.google.com/intl/%s/mobile/android/basic/privacy.html
ro.com.google.clientidbase=android-google
ro.com.android.wifi-watchlist=GoogleGuest
ro.setupwizard.enterprise_mode=1
ro.com.android.dateformat=MM-dd-yyyy
ro.com.android.dataroaming=false
ro.kernel.android.checkjni=0
ro.setupwizard.mode=OPTIONAL
net.bt.name=Android
dalvik.vm.stack-trace-file=/data/anr/traces.txt
dalvik.vm.execution-mode=int:jit
windowsmgr.max_events_per_sec=60
dalvik.vm.heapsize=26m
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

You can tone back auto killer to strict. I'm still running kaosfroyo v34 auto killer set to strict and I get 438. I have to ask though are you running setcpu and mine you try going back to v34. The only issue I have is with the gallery switching portrait to landscape and that's it.
Sent from my FroyoEris using XDA App

jonscapri said:
You can tone back auto killer to strict. I'm still running kaosfroyo v34 auto killer set to strict and I get 438. I have to ask though are you running setcpu and mine you try going back to v34. The only issue I have is with the gallery switching portrait to landscape and that's it.
Sent from my FroyoEris using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what would I expect going to v34? I will try setting it to strict and see if the performance is better..though I would think if I keep it to aggresive, naturally it would run better.

High benchmark scores do not necessary guarantee you the best performance results.
It's like overclocking a computer. You can overclock a CPU to squeeze the most juice out of it as possible, but in return, you'll get a very unstable system. The trick is to find a balance, not shoot for the stars in benchmark numbers.
Don't let high benchmarks fool you or get you too ambitious. If you use your phone as much as I do, I rely more on stability and overall performance.
Now finding that balance takes tweaking and testing. A link on my sig about improving Eris performance may help you in the right direction but again, it all varies. You have to find your phone's niche.

jonscapri said:
You can tone back auto killer to strict. I'm still running kaosfroyo v34 auto killer set to strict and I get 438. I have to ask though are you running setcpu and mine you try going back to v34. The only issue I have is with the gallery switching portrait to landscape and that's it.
Sent from my FroyoEris using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ha, moved it to strict and went way down...to like 310.
Just ran it again..and got 439. weird.
If I go back to v34, do I need to clear cache and do a fresh install, or will it downgrade appropriately?

Benchmarks mean nothing. Some people overclock very high. If you use a BFS kernel you'll get higher but you'll be less smooth.

jsuh said:
High benchmark scores do not necessary guarantee you the best performance results.
It's like overclocking a computer. You can overclock a CPU to squeeze the most juice out of it as possible, but in return, you'll get a very unstable system. The trick is to find a balance, not shoot for the stars in benchmark numbers.
Don't let high benchmarks fool you or get you too ambitious. If you use your phone as much as I do, I rely more on stability and overall performance.
Now finding that balance takes tweaking and testing. A link on my sig about improving Eris performance may help you in the right direction but again, it all varies. You have to find your phone's niche.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
whew...just updated the kernal and radio....got scared thought I had bricked my phone for a second.
couple questions.
Upgrading the radio..my buddy told me verizon should have phoned home for me to update my phone with a radio update. It didn't.
My baseband version is: 2.42.01.04.27 which is the same as the file I downloaded..so i assume the update was successful.
The kernal...is [email protected] #5
uh...is that the same as 2.6.29.6 Version 5?

bryank29 said:
whew...just updated the kernal and radio....got scared thought I had bricked my phone for a second.
couple questions.
Upgrading the radio..my buddy told me verizon should have phoned home for me to update my phone with a radio update. It didn't.
My baseband version is: 2.42.01.04.27 which is the same as the file I downloaded..so i assume the update was successful.
The kernal...is [email protected] #5
uh...is that the same as 2.6.29.6 Version 5?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep, 2.42.01.04.27 is what you want for your radio and your kernel is fine.

ok, after making all the necessary tweaks, including Dialer 1, etc.. while plugged in (which my setcpu profile is at 710 for plugged in) I got 431. This is with optimum Autokiller too.
While unplugged, I just got 441. ha, wtf

bryank29 said:
ok, after making all the necessary tweaks, including Dialer 1, etc.. while plugged in (which my setcpu profile is at 710 for plugged in) I got 431. This is with optimum Autokiller too.
While unplugged, I just got 441. ha, wtf
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Voila Enjoy

bryank29 said:
whew...just updated the kernal and radio....got scared thought I had bricked my phone for a second.
couple questions.
Upgrading the radio..my buddy told me verizon should have phoned home for me to update my phone with a radio update. It didn't.
My baseband version is: 2.42.01.04.27 which is the same as the file I downloaded..so i assume the update was successful.
The kernal...is [email protected] #5
uh...is that the same as 2.6.29.6 Version 5?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I believe you said earlier that you are running KaosFroyo v35-1.
If that is true you would have the following kernel, per Kaos' comments...
"Using Conap's V5 CFS kernel with my own optimizations"

Agressive 806 jit compcache 32heap kaos35 bfs v5 avg. 470 and 5.5 and is smooth and fast and awesome
Sent from my Froyobacod_Eris using XDA App

kaos35-1 BFSv5, JIT, SetCPU [email protected], vm heap=32 i get 5.446 and 498. My old eris running an older version of tazz was oc'ed to 810 and that got 5.6 and 510

g00gl3 said:
I believe you said earlier that you are running KaosFroyo v35-1.
If that is true you would have the following kernel, per Kaos' comments...
"Using Conap's V5 CFS kernel with my own optimizations"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, I am running 35-1. The kernal I installed came from Jsuh's blog/recommendation..so I guess I may have overwritten the kernal that came with 35-1.
with that said..my buddy mentioned if I upgraded my radio, I would have to do the programming update via Verizon. He questions whether my radio really got upgraded because I never had to do that. Thoughts?

whojabacod said:
Agressive 806 jit compcache 32heap kaos35 bfs v5 avg. 470 and 5.5 and is smooth and fast and awesome
Sent from my Froyobacod_Eris using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what is this 5.5 stuff? maybe I missing something. My benchmark screen just has me barely above the Moto Droid and at 433.
sounds like maybe I should bump up my heap vm size.
Also, in quandrant looked at my system info...didn't realize the Max frequency for the Eris is 864 MHz. I run at a max of 710 using SetCpu.

increasing my setCPU to 768 gave me a marginal bump, from 433 to 446.

It obviously isn't dead on because I can run 3 times in a row and get anywhere between 350 and 460.

bryank29 said:
what is this 5.5 stuff? maybe I missing something. My benchmark screen just has me barely above the Moto Droid and at 433.
sounds like maybe I should bump up my heap vm size.
Also, in quandrant looked at my system info...didn't realize the Max frequency for the Eris is 864 MHz. I run at a max of 710 using SetCpu.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The numbers in the hundreds are Quadrant scores. The numbers like 4, 5.5 are Linpack numbers, another benchmark software. You can find it on the Android Market.

jsuh said:
The numbers in the hundreds are Quadrant scores. The numbers like 4, 5.5 are Linpack numbers, another benchmark software. You can find it on the Android Market.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
just ran mine. 5.68. MFLOPS 4.995

[kernel] di11Pickle kernel

well, since this has been out and included in my rom for over a month now, i figure ill put it out here for all others to use as well since its been perfectly stable, smooth, fast, and very good on battery.
Kernel Feature's
-JPX source-patched with hardcore's k13a
-compiled with CodeSourcery 2010.09-51
-voodoo lagfix
-voodoo sound 4,
-voodoo sharpness and color (or speedmods screen adjustments)
-default scheduler-noop(better for non-spinning disks)
-bootanimation.zip
-xcaliberinhand's headphone fix-voice calls through headphones
-kernel HZ=500(smoother)
-338mb user accessible ram
-neldar's BLN 2.3
-working sdcard mount in recovery
-will auto convert all partitions ext4 at boot
-optimized compiler flags
-+ more
CONFIG_ARM_THUMBEE-y-enables thumbee processor mode
CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE=y-supposed to be better for raw processing power
disabled some debug stuff and print k for better performance- logger on(for adb)
this will hopefully get updated often, and i have another version im working on thats pretty different than anything else out now.
big thanks to harcore for the great speedmod kernel that this is patched with
big thanks to supercurio for the great voodoo work
thanks to xcaliberinhand for the great reorient work
BIG THANKS to exists for answering my questions when i was first getting started with this.

I'll definitely put this on my Captivate. Can't wait to see what's in the works.
Sent from my CM7 Inspire

Ive tried all the other kernels, might as well try one more and see where it rates on my phone. Thanks for posting this.

does Speedmod screen adjustments include the lower brightness setting?

doreyu said:
does Speedmod screen adjustments include the lower brightness setting?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, speedmod based (build 2) should be having lower brightness compared to build 3.

Can u change the splash screen to display the capitvate model # SGH-I897 instead of GT-i9000?
Sent from my Captivate using XDA Premium

[discussion] Benchmarking!! Which is the best ROM/kernel ?

This discussion aims at getting our x10 the best ROM or kernel or any MOD of all TIME!!
Benchmarking is an easy way to test your phone performance.Either CPU,2D & 3D graphics or SD card and Data transfer.
you can do it simply by software like AnTuTu or Quadrant.
The Point in this discussion is to test your phone and write ur best score at all time.Then you tell us your phone status.and tell us what is -in your opinion is the cause of your high score,so that we can determine which are best ROMs,Kernels or CPU governors,etc.
Please notice that Benchmarking is A ROUGH indicator of your phone performance. it is not necessarily that your phone is slower if you have lower scores
PLEASE SHARE YOUR
1.Best score.
2.which software did u use? scores are very different.
3.ROM.
4.kernel.
5.CPU min/max.
6.CPU governor.
7.SD card info.
8.Opinions.
Thanks,
Omar.
---------- Post added at 01:55 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:37 AM ----------
MINE are:
1.1624
2.Quadrant.
3.WB 5.0c ROM.
4.DooMKernel v4.0.
5.192/1152 Mhz.
6.Performance.
7.8GB sandisk,class 6.
8. i think WB tweaks has increased my scores specially in v 5.0.
also overclocking and performance governor-CPU @ 1152 all the test-.

I was just about to ask this myself
1. 38.45 (Avg of 5 tests)
2. Linpack Pro
3. WB 5.0c ROM.
4. WB stock with OC tweak
5. 245/1152 Mhz.
6. interactive
7. 32GB Sandisk, class 4.
8. None.
It would be great if devs could post the performance stats of their Rom with their releases

1.- 2592
2.- AnTuTu Benchmark
3.- CM7 ZMOD
4.- DooMKernel v5 with overclock
5.- 128 - 1113 mhz
6.- smartassv2
7.- stock 16gb class 2
8.- I think you can get a better score with a tweaked rom, a better sd card and another cpu scaling

Score: 1795 Quadrant Advanced
ROM: MIUI 1.9.16 by 28Spawn with SWAP included- no data restored.
26fps stable on graphics- 2D leaf
class 2 stock 8gb card
Kernel: DooMKernel 05 for unlocked bootloader min 128 max 1075 smartass v2
8. SWAP files incrase my performance greatly. Tweaks do nothing but drain battery and cause lag. IMHO.

2352
Quadrant standard
Spaarc oxygenated gingerscape
Stock kernel
Locked bootloader
245-1113
Basic z oc
Zdzihu smartass
Memory card class 4
6.8 mB/s read
11.9 mB/s write
sent from my Android powered smart phone

1. 1.288
2. Quadrant Std.
3. Wolf 6.0.0c
4. DooMKernel v04b
5. 1.152 / 128
6. Interactive
7. stock 8GB
8. None

KuSkUS_68 said:
1. 1.288
2. Quadrant Std.
3. Wolf 6.0.0c
4. DooMKernel v04b
5. 1.152 / 128
6. Interactive
7. stock 8GB
8. None
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think your benchmarking should have a higher score.is that the highest one?
Sent from my X10i using XDA App

Prodigy said:
Score: 1795 Quadrant Advanced
ROM: MIUI 1.9.16 by 28Spawn with SWAP included- no data restored.
26fps stable on graphics- 2D leaf
class 2 stock 8gb card
Kernel: DooMKernel 05 for unlocked bootloader min 128 max 1075 smartass v2
8. SWAP files incrase my performance greatly. Tweaks do nothing but drain battery and cause lag. IMHO.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes man..i only got those scores with miui.
1.1755
2.Quadrant advanced.
3.Miui 1.9.9. Erenz's
4.DoomKernel v3b.
5.192/1152.
6.performance.
7.8GB sandisk class 6.
8. i got very high I/O scores "1600".used to get only 600 with WB ROM v5c.
but with AnTuTu are very low,only 4.5 Mb/s read & 8 Mb/s write. don't know why!!
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
---------- Post added at 01:29 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:18 PM ----------
spaarc said:
2352
Quadrant standard
Spaarc oxygenated gingerscape
Stock kernel
Locked bootloader
245-1113
Basic z oc
Zdzihu smartass
Memory card class 4
6.8 mB/s read
11.9 mB/s write
sent from my Android powered smart phone
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
how on smartass ?
That's very high man.. are using XPERIA x10 i need a photo to make sure u aren't using SGS II

romasalah said:
Yes man..i only got those scores with miui.
1.1755
2.Quadrant advanced.
3.Miui 1.9.9. Erenz's
4.DoomKernel v3b.
5.192/1152.
6.performance.
7.8GB sandisk class 6.
8. i got very high I/O scores "1600".used to get only 600 with WB ROM v5c.
but with AnTuTu are very low,only 4.5 Mb/s read & 8 Mb/s write. don't know why!!
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
---------- Post added at 01:29 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:18 PM ----------
how on smartass ?
That's very high man.. are using XPERIA x10 i need a photo to make sure u aren't using SGS II
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes I'm using x10 very well ...
Search for gingerscape in x10 development thread
sent from my Android powered smart phone

romasalah said:
I think your benchmarking should have a higher score.is that the highest one?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually that's what I thought comparing yours.
I have been trying other governors and the best score till now is 1378 with smartassv2 (tried only interactivex, interactive and smartassv2)
I'll keep on trying with other settings...

how on smartass ?
That's very high man.. are using XPERIA x10 i need a photo to make sure u aren't using SGS II
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1212012&highlight=smartass

Skumtomten said:
how on smartass ?
That's very high man.. are using XPERIA x10 i need a photo to make sure u aren't using SGS II
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1212012&highlight=smartass
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dude it's the rom Not smartass
https://picasaweb.google.com/100227745563198630514/DropBox#5651119841938055298

romasalah said:
Yes man..i only got those scores with miui.
1.1755
2.Quadrant advanced.
3.Miui 1.9.9. Erenz's
4.DoomKernel v3b.
5.192/1152.
6.performance.
7.8GB sandisk class 6.
8. i got very high I/O scores "1600".used to get only 600 with WB ROM v5c.
but with AnTuTu are very low,only 4.5 Mb/s read & 8 Mb/s write. don't know why!!
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
---------- Post added at 01:29 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:18 PM ----------
how on smartass ?
That's very high man.. are using XPERIA x10 i need a photo to make sure u aren't using SGS II
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
he's obviously using the io hack which makes this score fake.. .
you could not get a legitimate score that high on an x10...
---------- Post added at 04:22 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:21 PM ----------
spaarc said:
Dude it's the rom Not smartass
https://picasaweb.google.com/100227745563198630514/DropBox#5651119841938055298
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so your rom uses a hack to give fake scores, they are trying to figure out the fastest rom objectively.
disable the hack and report back

scoobysnacks said:
he's obviously using the io hack which makes this score fake.. .
you could not get a legitimate score that high on an x10...
---------- Post added at 04:22 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:21 PM ----------
so your rom uses a hack to give fake scores, they are trying to figure out the fastest rom objectively.
disable the hack and report back
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1376
That's the score after disabling the tweak

scoobysnacks said:
he's obviously using the io hack which makes this score fake.. .
you could not get a legitimate score that high on an x10...
---------- Post added at 04:22 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:21 PM ----------
so your rom uses a hack to give fake scores, they are trying to figure out the fastest rom objectively.
disable the hack and report back
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
does MIUI uses this hack?
I got 1804 with MIUI 1.9.16
@1152-smartass v2

romasalah said:
does MIUI uses this hack?
I got 1804 with MIUI 1.9.16
@1152-smartass v2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no idea. anything over 1500 or 1600 is generally pretty suspect though

Skumtomten said:
how on smartass ?
That's very high man.. are using XPERIA x10 i need a photo to make sure u aren't using SGS II
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1212012&highlight=smartass
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah,thanks I know about smartass and i use it. But i always have a wrong belief that performance is the best governor for benchmarking.May be cause it's always operates the processor @ Max frequency
---------- Post added at 06:18 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:15 PM ----------
scoobysnacks said:
no idea. anything over 1500 or 1600 is generally pretty suspect though
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i guess MIUI may be using it...with AnTuTu my benchmarking is normal -from 2500 to 2700- but with Quadrant my I/O has increased from 600 to 1600 after MIUI.

...more of a test...
1.
a) 2262 (3087)
b) 1274 (at the third times), (1440)
c) 37 MFLOPS (over 39)
d) 60 sec. (51 sec.)
e) 30 fps (31.2)​
2.
a) Antutu benchmark.
b) Quadrant
c) Linpack
d) SQLite
e) Neocore​
3.XperiaTW 6.0c ROM.
4.DooMKernel v4.0.b
5.128/1113 Mhz.
6.SmartassV2.
7.16GB,class 6 Kingstone.
8. I state that the test results, the present condition (full of applications, more than 100, then the X10 is under stress), are lower than those obtained in the past without so many applications installed. I have met with many peaks FROYO (TW custom ROM) and are shown alongside those of the scores in brackets .. I tried several tests in the past who now do not use hardly any, this thread I have "suggested" to review the scores to currently, although the comparison is not reasonable
Sorry for my English, I used google translate

1. 1.004
2. Quadrant Std.
3. Wolf 6.0.0c
4. DooMKernel v04b
5. stock
6. Im a Noob so dont know Its all at standart^^
7. stock 8GB
8. None

Cecco1970 said:
1.
a) 2262 (3087)
b) 1274 (at the third times), (1440)
c) 37 MFLOPS (over 39)
d) 60 sec. (51 sec.)
e) 30 fps (31.2)​
2.
a) Antutu benchmark.
b) Quadrant
c) Linpack
d) SQLite
e) Neocore​
3.XperiaTW 6.0c ROM.
4.DooMKernel v4.0.b
5.128/1113 Mhz.
6.SmartassV2.
7.16GB,class 6 Kingstone.
8. I state that the test results, the present condition (full of applications, more than 100, then the X10 is under stress), are lower than those obtained in the past without so many applications installed. I have met with many peaks FROYO (TW custom ROM) and are shown alongside those of the scores in brackets .. I tried several tests in the past who now do not use hardly any, this thread I have "suggested" to review the scores to currently, although the comparison is not reasonable
Sorry for my English, I used google translate
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks for doing all these tests..
a large number of app affects memory testing and I/O..but i think not too much it doesn't have great range to play with.
Also i noticed high peaks with AnTuTu reaching above 3000 only with FROYO.
and noticed high graphics scores..may be double GB. but i don't know why .
Can't state that froyo has higher graphics than GB -although i heared alittle of that - Coz i didn't see high benchmarks with Quadrant in froyo.

[ROM]CyanogenMod 7.2.0-Nightly-Unofficial .35 Kernel

CyanogenMod 7.2 Nightly for U8800
About
This rom is compiled from latest CM7.2 source with kernel 2.6.35.
Features
Kernel support overclock to 1804MHz.
Default speed to max 806MHz, min 245MHz, ondemand governors.
Compcache is default to 18%.
All languages supported by CM are included. Default to english U.S.
Rom manager and Google apps are not included.
Please down Google apps here (http://cmw.22aaf3.com/gapps/gapps-gb-20110828-signed.zip).
Download
http://code.google.com/p/cm7-u8800/downloads/list
Installation
You must have upgraded to the official gingerbread rom and installed CWM recovery 5.0.2.7.
You must wipe data for first time installation.
It takes about 3 minutes to install the rom and 3 minutes for first boot.
Restart the phone several times after first boot, then install google apps, that should avoid some strange behaviors of the rom.
It is better to wipe cache and Dalvik cache for update.
Credit
Thanks to CyanogenMod team, genokolar, dzo, stockwell and other developers of the u8800.
History
2012-Jun-29
Updated
updated CyanogenMod source.
updated audio, omx, egl library.
sound quality is as same as official rom,
graphics performance should be improved.
default compcache to 18% (may be too high).
known issues
1) Mute camera shutter option is not working
Settings -> CyanogenMod Settings -> Sound
work around, rename or delete the shutter sound file
/system/media/audio/ui/camera_click.ogg.
2) taking video with wrong color and very low frame rate.
2012-Jul-04
fixed recording video with wrong color and very low frame rate
enable SRS audio processing
disable VSYNC

Will have the Portuguese language? Thank you.

It includes all languages supported by android, I didn't check all of them though.

wmi543 said:
It includes all languages supported by android, I didn't check all of them though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay, I'm just asking because Geno dont has the Portuguese ... if this had was very good.

Did enyone try this rom already ??
Sent from my U8800 using XDA

I'll test it tomorrow.

So far so good.. no complaint.. will test battery life..
Sent from my u8800 using XDA

its a very good rom, so far so good, but... its hardware acceleration active?
my GPU scores in antutu are very poor
368-1200 ondemand
antutu 2.8.2
total score 2723
gpu score 588
And games and UI are very lagy :S
EDIT: debug.composition.type=gpu in build.prop makes no diference

kaza said:
its a very good rom, so far so good, but... its hardware acceleration active?
my GPU scores in antutu are very poor
368-1200 ondemand
antutu 2.8.2
total score 2723
gpu score 588
And games and UI are very lagy :S
EDIT: debug.composition.type=gpu in build.prop makes no diference
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Now u mention it. I think u re right.. feel a little bit laggy..
Sent from my u8800 using XDA

kaza said:
its a very good rom, so far so good, but... its hardware acceleration active?
my GPU scores in antutu are very poor
368-1200 ondemand
antutu 2.8.2
total score 2723
gpu score 588
And games and UI are very lagy :S
EDIT: debug.composition.type=gpu in build.prop makes no diference
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The default max cpu speed is 800MHz, change it to 1000MHz should help to improve the speed.
You may also try to change the model name in build.prop, pls refer to the second post in this thread (http://forum.xda-developers.com/show....php?t=1048813) to improve game perforamce, I didn't test it myself though.

wmi543 said:
The default max cpu speed is 800MHz, change it to 1000MHz should help to improve the speed.
You may also try to change the model name in build.prop, pls refer to the second post in this thread (http://forum.xda-developers.com/show....php?t=1048813) to improve game perforamce, I didn't test it myself though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have my build.prop edited to Desire HD and i am using 368MHz min and 1.2HGz max with ondemand and didnt improve, everithing seems to run at 22-24 fps

yep, agree.. temple run and fruit ninja seems bad..
have experienced such bugs in aurora ics but now its ok
Sent from my U8800 using XDA

So will be a upgrade for all those problems on Graphics ?
i think the problem is just that ...
anyway is there a way to unistall the ADW launcher and this File Manager ?
Edit: also there any update of market that you can tell us plz (because of the compatibility), send me the download via PM plz

Januh said:
So will be a upgrade for all those problems on Graphics ?
i think the problem is just that ...
anyway is there a way to unistall the ADW launcher and this File Manager ?
Edit: also there any update of market that you can tell us plz (because of the compatibility), send me the download via PM plz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't have time to check the graphics yet, besides it is quite ok on my phone.
I've uploaded a new build, it should be the final release of CM 7.2, but I doubt there is much differences between the last build and the new one regarding graphics performance.
You can use Taitanium Backup to remove those app, regarding market app, once you install the google apps and run market, it will update itself, if you got trouble with the update, try clear the data and cache of the market app.
Settings -> Applications -> Manage applications -> All -> Market

Did anyone try new version ???
What about low quality sound issue ???
Sent from my U8800 using XDA

Did enyone try new version ???
What about low quality sound issue ???
Sent from my U8800 using XDA

Stopa said:
Did enyone try new version ???
What about low quality sound issue ???
Sent from my U8800 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've uploaded a new build, pls read first post for details.

it work with atmel screen?

wmi543 said:
2012-Jun-29
Updated
updated CyanogenMod source.
updated audio, omx, egl library.
sound quality is as same as official rom,
graphics performance should be improved.
default compcache to 18% (may be too high).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
nope.avi

Metsuki19 said:
nope.avi
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
built-in movie player doesn't support avi, use other player such as mobo player.

Kernel Tweaks

So I saw this over on the s3 forums and it gave me an idea
If everyone who sees this could post the kernel setup (overclocking, schedulers, or other tweaks) that has given either a) the best performance or b) the best battery life, it would be awesome and really help noobs like me who have never overclocked :laugh:
I know that every phone is different and blah blah blah, but I'm hoping that this would at least give us kernel tweaking noobs someplace to start besides just changing random settings and hoping for the best.
Thank you all in advance, all contributions are welcome
When posting, please state if you are addressing performance or battery life tweaks, and what Android version those were applied on just to make things a bit easier to follow
:good: :good:
Thanks!
TWEAKS
Performance
1.5 max, 255 min Interactive noop - Contributed by @thronnos
1.728 max, 184 min Performance noop - Contributed by @klund29078
Balanced
1.2 Max, 245 min Interactive noop - Contributed by @Chad the Pathfinder

I run 1.5/255 Interactive Noop
Shifted from planet Namek
---------- Post added at 10:21 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:21 PM ----------
But I also am running a couple PmR and Seeder tweaks
Shifted from planet Namek

Like I said, please indicate if thats for performance, or battery life, just helps to sort things out
Sent from my PG06100

CNexus said:
Like I said, please indicate if thats for performance, or battery life, just helps to sort things out
Sent from my PG06100
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh its been the best all around performance I could find. Only thing that ran generally better was an old sparksco kernel. And with wifi the phone can last days
Shifted from planet Namek

Cmon guys, theres gotta be more people who have good settings.
Sent from my PG06100

I'm by no means an expert on the subject but I run:
1.728/184 performance noop.
Honestly, I'd like to know the meanings of all the governors and I/o schedulers to have a better understanding of it. Mine is set for performance, obviously, but the battery life is not that bad. I always keep a charger with me though because I use my phone heavily everyday.

CNexus said:
Cmon guys, theres gotta be more people who have good settings.
Sent from my PG06100
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got tons of stuff, just most of it's not very organized... I'll try to post some tweaks and such up here later when I get off work. I wish there was a tool to organize my computer and SD card for me... But it probably wouldn't do it the way I want

klund29078 said:
I'm by no means an expert on the subject but I run:
1.728/184 performance noop.
Honestly, I'd like to know the meanings of all the governors and I/o schedulers to have a better understanding of it. Mine is set for performance, obviously, but the battery life is not that bad. I always keep a charger with me though because I use my phone heavily everyday.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got you
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1941195
Click the "Android CPU governors explained" link
Sent from my PG06100

I've tried several combonations and the one I like most on my Shift is 1.2 max 245 min Interactive, noop. That seems to give me the best ballance between battery life and performance. My favorite kernels for sense ROMs have been Strapped's Supreme Sense kernel and Dodge's v1.6. Others are good too, these are just my favorites.

CNexus said:
I got you
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1941195
Click the "Android CPU governors explained" link
Sent from my PG06100
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you the man! thanks for the link.

Here's some good build.prop tweaks:
ro.max.fling_velocity=15000
ro.min.fling_velocity=10000
ro.HOME_APP_ADJ=1
debug.sf.hw=1
debug.performance.tuning=1
debug.composition.type=gpu
debug.kill_allocating_task=1
debug.egl.hw=1
video.accelerate.hw=1
persist.sys.use_dithering=1
persist.sys.purgeable_assets=1
persist.sys.shutdown.mode=hibernate
pm.sleep_mode=1
ro.ril.disable.power.collapse=0
ro.ril.hep=1
ril.ecclist=911,#911,*911
media.stagefright.enable-player=true
media.stagefright.enable-meta=true
media.stagefright.enable-scan=false
media.stagefright.enable-http=true
ro.mot.eri.losalert.delay=1000
ro.lge.proximity.delay=25
mot.proximity.delay=25
dalvik.vm.execution-mode=int:jit
dalvik.vm.dexopt-data-only=1
ro.compcache.default=0
net.tcp.buffersize.wimax=4096,221184,524288,4096,16384,110208
net.tcp.buffersize.gprs=4094,87380,256960,4096,16384,110208
net.tcp.buffersize.wifi=4096,87380,256960,4096,16384,256960
You can copy and paste them into build.prop with a root browser, save, and reboot
---------- Post added at 06:32 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:50 PM ----------
Here's some more tweaks you can put in sysctl.conf (or make it if you don't have it):
net.ipv4.tcp_ecn=0
net.ipv4.route.flush = 1
net.ipv4.tcp_rfc1337 = 1
net.ipv4.ip_no_pmtu_disc = 0
net.ipv4.tcp_sack = 1
net.ipv4.tcp_fack = 1
net.ipv4.tcp_window_scaling = 1
net.ipv4.tcp_timestamps = 1
net.ipv4.tcp_rmem = 4096 39000 187000
net.ipv4.tcp_wmem = 4096 39000 187000
net.ipv4.tcp_mem = 187000 187000 187000
net.ipv4.tcp_no_metrics_save = 1
net.ipv4.tcp_moderate_rcvbuf = 1
net.ipv4.conf.all.accept_source_route = 0
net.ipv4.conf.all.accept_redirects = 0
net.ipv4.conf.default.accept_redirects = 0
net.ipv4.conf.all.secure_redirects = 0
net.ipv4.conf.default.secure_redirects = 0
kernel.sched_child_runs_first=0
kernel.sched_rt_period_us=1000000
kernel.sched_rt_runtime_us=950000
kernel.panic=30
kernel.core_uses_pid=0
kernel.core_pattern=core
kernel.core_pipe_limit=0
kernel.tainted=512
kernel.real-root-dev=0
kernel.print-fatal-signals=0
kernel.ctrl-alt-del=0
kernel.ftrace_enabled=1
kernel.ftrace_dump_on_oops=0
kernel.threads-max=10000
kernel.random.poolsize=4096
kernel.random.read_wakeup_threshold=512
kernel.random.write_wakeup_threshold=256
kernel.overflowuid=65534
kernel.overflowgid=65534
kernel.pid_max=32768
kernel.panic_on_oops=1
kernel.dmesg_restrict=0
kernel.kptr_restrict=0
kernel.ngroups_max=65536
kernel.watchdog=1
kernel.watchdog_thresh=10
kernel.softlockup_panic=1
kernel.nmi_watchdog=1
kernel.randomize_va_space=1
kernel.hung_task_panic=0
kernel.hung_task_check_count=32768
kernel.hung_task_timeout_secs=30
kernel.hung_task_warnings=10
kernel.max_lock_depth=0
kernel.keys.maxkeys=200
kernel.keys.maxbytes=20000
kernel.keys.root_maxkeys=200
kernel.keys.root_maxbytes=20000
kernel.keys.gc_delay=300
kernel.perf_event_paranoid=1
kernel.perf_event_mlock_kb=516
kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate=150000
kernel.blk_iopoll=1
kernel.hostname=localhost
kernel.domainname=localdomain
kernel.shmmax=33554432
kernel.shmall=2097152
kernel.shmmni=4096
kernel.msgmax=8192
kernel.msgmni=1041
kernel.msgmnb=16384
kernel.auto_msgmni=1
vm.min_free_kbytes=4096
vm.panic_on_oom=0
vm.oom_kill_allocating_task=0
vm.vfs_cache_pressure=20
vm.oom_dump_tasks=1
vm.drop_caches=3
vm.max_map_count=65530
vm.block_dump=1
vm.stat_interval=1
vm.mmap_min_addr=204
vm.highmem_is_dirtyable=1
vm.scan_unevictable_pages=0
---------- Post added at 06:59 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:32 PM ----------
Or here is the sysctl.conf file with the tweaks listed above. Place in system/etc with a root browser, fix permissions, and reboot
http://db.tt/LTFf4Vdi

Oh and the sysctl.conf file is meant for 4.1+ AOSP, make a nand first, I can't guarantee anything under that... Just make a nand. I don't see why it wouldn't work on lower versions but I don't know, I only run JB now.

bilgerryan said:
Oh and the sysctl.conf file is meant for 4.1+ AOSP, make a nand first, I can't guarantee anything under that... Just make a nand. I don't see why it wouldn't work on lower versions but I don't know, I only run JB now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To support what bilgerryan said, I tried the sysctl.cont file on sense gb before and it didn't help.

Chad The Pathfinder said:
To support what bilgerryan said, I tried the sysctl.cont file on sense gb before and it didn't help.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah just be careful with using it with Sense, I've seen it cause boot loops on TouchWiz (people never listen... Or is it that they just didn't read the instructions?). Either way, it's meant for JB AOSP and probably won't work on anything below ICS.
The build.prop tweaks work on all ROMs tho.

bilgerryan said:
Yeah just be careful with using it with Sense, I've seen it cause boot loops on TouchWiz (people never listen... Or is it that they just didn't read the instructions?). Either way, it's meant for JB AOSP and probably won't work on anything below ICS.
The build.prop tweaks work on all ROMs tho.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It worked wonders for me on GB

CNexus said:
It worked wonders for me on GB
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The sysctl.conf or the build.prop tweaks? I'm talking about the specific sysctl.conf that I linked to above Just for clarification. You can use a sysctl.conf file on any ROM, just saying these tweaks I did for JB.
And as far as overclocking on the Shift I use the same settings as Chad except I use Smartass (or v2 if available) and sio or deadline for I/O