My tf had been sitting in my drawer for a long period due to lag and choppy performance. However, recently i decided to browse the forum and found RaymanFX JB AOSP rom with Linaro enhancement and gave it a try. After trying his rom, i was shocked by the benchmark result because at some test it exceeds the speed on my GSIII (Browsermark result is around 180k and my GSIII scored around 150k). Here i attached my benchmark result.
You can see that in quadrant the cpu score is more than double than devices with same tegra 2 chipset. i am wondering is anybody get the same result with their tf?
Heres mine
on 1500mhz RaymanFX's Cynogenmod
Related
Most roms that I`ve tried (CM7 based and MIUI) perform a bit slow in quadrant (1000-1250) ,
and I`ve seen hd2`s with over 2000 , 3000 and even closing near 4000 .
I want the device to enter to a database of quadrant scores I have in my forum ,
if anyone could recommend any good roms for this purpose I`d appreciate it .
Thanks ,
Danny .
Try coredroid 1.6 and make a overclock!
Quadrant scores as has been said countless times does not mean that the actual build in question is necessarily faster (or more stable) than another build where it might score a lower Quadrant score it is just a benchmark and should not be taken as meaning the build is blazing fast, a build i had about 7 months ago had a score about 2250 yet the build i have on my phone now Hyperdroid CM7 is considerably faster and more stable and the Quadrant score is about 1300 but it doesn't bother me in the slightest.
why do you want a synthetic benchmark rating system to tell you how fast your device isnt?
So Qualcomm just released an awesome new benchmarking tool, its quite comprehensive, go check it out:
https://market.android.com/details?id=com.quicinc.vellamo&feature=search_result
Curious what kind of scores everyone is getting.
On the bonsai 0.1.6 ROM, OC @ 1.4ghz I am getting 1201
Share yours, along with ROM and OC (if any)!
949 on purely stock GT.
Sent from my badass Galaxy Tab 10.1.
951 Stock
949 TouchWiz (Wifi)
I wonder why there are such drastic differences between stock and TW Quadrant scores (17xx vs 22xx).
hoodoomagic said:
951 Stock
949 TouchWiz (Wifi)
I wonder why there are such drastic differences between stock and TW Quadrant scores (17xx vs 22xx).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This benchmark focuses more on user experience. Quadrant has very low level tests that are surely effected more by slight hardware optimizations. Also I have never seen consistent scores on quadrant (they fluctuate +/- 200) With this I am consistently getting the same score within 5-10, which is nice.
952 - stock, unrooted
1170, bonzai ROM 0.1.3 overclocked to 1.4Ghz.
I installed this rom the other day and so far everything works except the screen rotation lock button but no rom has that working.
Frst its HC 3.2 ported over from the xoom has the new feature of being able to upscall the smaller apps to the larger screen.
Over clocking is built in just get set cpu and off you go.
My acer is over clocked to 1.5 and here are my benchmark scores.
Useing Quadrant I got 3421 (best of three runs) and frame rates around 45
Useing Linpack I got 45.438 mflpos on single thread in 1.85 seconds and
71.53 mflops on multi-thread in 2.36 seconds again best of three runs
Useing AnTuTu Benchmark I got a score of 6159 and frame rates right at around 60 fps
Useing Vellamo (its new and a benchmark tool for a tablets browser to see how ell the browser performs does things like java and flash stress tests and load speeds of web pages) I got a score of 1072
These are the top 4 bench mark tools for android and these scores while may not look impressive are awsome. in comparisons on benchmark tools grafs these score are much higher them most tablets.
bottom line this tablet rocks.
If your into benchmarking and tweaking as I am please post your results here list benchmark toos used,scores and with rom your running and cpu speed. so we can get and over all view of this remarkable tablet.
I got 1291 from Vellamo using Stock 3.1 with custom Kernel Taboonay CPU 1408Mhz
same rom, same oc, similar scores XD this tablet does rock!!!!!!
Hey everyone
I ran antutu benchmark on my nexus 4 running PA v3.97 and i got a score of a little more than 16 thousand and then i install the semaphore kernel and got an embarrassing score of 14162. Whats happening? Arent these a little odd considering that a STOCK Nexus4 has a score of 20 thousand?
And another un-related thing, The carbon rom is not booting up with the matr1x kernel. the google sign comes up and no bootanimation and it stays there.
Really need your help, Thanks
If there is one thing I learnt here it would be that benchmarks are unreliable.
Make sure that kernel matches the ROMs Android version and build, it may not be even supported.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 4
Stock doesn't score 20k
Check your CPU speed on your Antutu Detailed Score, I would say most likely it was caused by the CPU throttling if it's not 1514 (or something around that),
Custom ROM can be the culprit too, since I only get 13k-14k score with MIUI (from miuiandroid) which is pretty embarassing, that was MTK6579 level.
My stock 4.2.2 doesn't even come close to 20k score. Only 17,900 something.
I just bought a used Note II GT-N7105 so before I sell my GT-N7000 I decided to take advantage of it not being needed and run a quick comparison between the Samsung Jelly Bean 4.1.2 firmware and the latest CM11 (20150419). In each case it is absolutely stock except for the installation of Quadrant apk. The stock firmware is really stock (no 3rd party recovery) and CM runs with the CWM version it ships with. No accounts set up, no SIM, nothing removed or added except a 16GB microSD containing no media except a signed recovery and a modern kernel (to enable installing cm) and a cm11 nightly zip. The only additional change from set up is to connect to my wifi.
I ran the test several times on each OS and below are the best results from each:
Samsung 4.1.2
Code:
Overall: 4505
CPU: 6730
Mem: 5003
I/O :8669
2D: 321
3D: 1803
CM11
Code:
Overall: 4030
CPU: 7581
Mem: 3265
I/O: 6865
2D: 243
3D: 2196
Although not every run of the benchmark produces identical numbers the same differences between each firmware are reliably apparent in every test - CM11 has much poorer 2D performance but slightly better 3D. CM has better CPU score but worse Mem and slightly worse I/O scores.
CM 10.1.3 benchmark
Same benchmark, same conditions but this time it's CM 10.1.3 which is the last official stable CM release for the GT-N7000. This time I installed Lanchon's FPBug fix kernel so as to avoid bricking the device right before I sell it... http://forum.xda-developers.com/gal...ernel-fpbug-stable-4-x-kernel-galaxy-t2978107
Code:
Overall: 3765
CPU: 7135
Mem: 2324
I/O : 6094
2D: 314
3D: 2147
These were the best results of 5 runs, all were similar.
The most striking thing is that in CM 10.1.3 2D and 3D performance are excellent, comparable to or even marginally better than stock. CPU score is great. I/O not great but not terrible. Memory score ...oh dear - really bad every time, even worse than CM11 and that was poor already.
Probably in real use the most visible difference to us users is that 2D performance is excellent - no lagging, no jerkiness, no stutters - a really snappy feel. KitKat was a giant leap backwards in this respect.
10.1.3 feels nice and usable so my next post will be one more set of benchmarks in 10.1.3 with JB gapps installed, my google account set up and all my usual apps installed, and everything up to date, as far as is possible.
CM 10.1.3 + Gapps benchmark
CM 10.1.3 with Gapps and Rekey patch. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=io.rekey.rekey
Code:
Overall: 3599
CPU: 7161
Mem: 2368
I/O : 6004
2D: 317
3D: 2147
The undisputed best performer is Samsung Touch Wiz JB 4.1.2, and by a very long way.
Lollipop Benchmarks
I noticed Bauner's NightOwl LP 5.1 (unofficial CM 12.1) got an update this week so I installed it and benchmarked it. As above, totally default except Quadrant installed and my wifi connected. No Gapps:
Code:
Overall: 4577
CPU: 11438
Mem: 3206
I/O : 5853
2D: 235
3D: 2152
This is the only ROM, so far, whose overall benchmark score is better than stock Samsung Jelly Bean. The 2D performance and Mem scores are still poor and the CPU score seems remarkably high and I wonder if it is reliable or credible. I will try Antutu next to see if it produces similar remarkable differences.
julian67 said:
I noticed Bauner's NightOwl LP 5.1 (unofficial CM 12.1) got an update this week so I installed it and benchmarked it. As above, totally default except Quadrant installed and my wifi connected. No Gapps:
Code:
Overall: 4577
CPU: 11438
Mem: 3206
I/O : 5853
2D: 235
3D: 2152
This is the only ROM, so far, whose overall benchmark score is better than stock Samsung Jelly Bean. The 2D performance and Mem scores are still poor and the CPU score seems remarkably high and I wonder if it is reliable or credible. I will try Antutu next to see if it produces similar remarkable differences.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The cpu scores can be higher, because my higher thermal throttling values.
With the stock values the cpu is running very fast into thermal throttling.
The differences in I/O and memory scores can be come because lollipop is much more complex and there are running much more services in the background.
It would be very interesting to see the results with the raw kernel.
If there the scores for I/O and mem are higher I should check which changes in my kernel are causing the regression
OK the thermal throttling explains a lot.
Last night I ran antutu on JB and on NightOwl. My Note actually became so hot after these benchmarks on LP that I shut it down immedaitely afterwards. Not warm, but actually hot (this in a room at about 15 C). Running Samsung JB it is usally cool to the touch and occasionally gets slightly warm. Perhaps there is a happy medium range that doesn't lead to such experiences? I would hate to run this in a hot climate (I once killed a £1300 laptop by trying to save a few pennies on AC in Bangkok... ha ha lesson learned).
I will do some more tests this evening or tomorrow (family day out today) and will include raw kernel.
julian67 said:
OK the thermal throttling explains a lot.
Last night I ran antutu on JB and on NightOwl. My Note actually became so hot after these benchmarks on LP that I shut it down immedaitely afterwards. Not warm, but actually hot (this in a room at about 15 C). Running Samsung JB it is usally cool to the touch and occasionally gets slightly warm. Perhaps there is a happy medium range that doesn't lead to such experiences? I would hate to run this in a hot climate (I once killed a £1300 laptop by trying to save a few pennies on AC in Bangkok... ha ha lesson learned).
I will do some more tests this evening or tomorrow (family day out today) and will include raw kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This values should not harm your device. I'm using it for a long time, and also with many hours of cpu stress testing. The overheat protection values are not changed.
see http://forum.xda-developers.com/galaxy-note/general/antutu-benchmarks-nightowl-lp-12-1-vs-t3093720 for antutu benchmarks (ongoing).