I soled my pc on linux , so i find way to sync kernel to 3.0+ can someone try it ?
http://rsync.samba.org/
http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/
http://armlinux.simtec.co.uk/
n1kolaa said:
I soled my pc on linux
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Soled? What does that mean?
Also kernel went from 2.x to 3.x version numbering without any special changes/features. It was just time to go to 3.x die tp 2.x being quite old. It's not like it's any different.
mrw0rm said:
Soled? What does that mean?
Also kernel went from 2.x to 3.x version numbering without any special changes/features. It was just time to go to 3.x die tp 2.x being quite old. It's not like it's any different.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He meant sold, I presume.
Sent from my LT18i using Tapatalk 2
mrw0rm said:
Soled? What does that mean?
Also kernel went from 2.x to 3.x version numbering without any special changes/features. It was just time to go to 3.x die tp 2.x being quite old. It's not like it's any different.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
plz read changelog of kernel on kernel.org ....
Related
I was wondering why its been so quite after HTC released the new kernel for the Sprint Hero, I thought that was the missing link that was needed for complete 1.6/2.0/2.1 roms?
It hasn't been quiet.
Also the kernel that HTC released needs to be ported to 2.6.29 to fully work with 1.6+.
All this info is on the forum & easily obtainable.
gu1dry said:
It hasn't been quiet.
Also the kernel that HTC released needs to be ported to 2.6.29 to fully work with 1.6+.
All this info is on the forum & easily obtainable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just thought we would see some 1.6/2.0/2.1 releases now that the kernel was released, that's all
There's been 1.6+ releases for a while...
Let me elaborate a little here:
This kernel that was released is not a magic bullet, it allows us to see what code needs to be changed to get the correct Kernel to run these newer versions. It also lets us make any performance changes we can find.
All of the changes need to be put into the current kernel source,making it a .29 or whatever we need.
It has been fairly quite, we aren't seeing tons of Roms being thrown out to the market, thankfully. Our devs are taking all the time they need to make sure everything works and is stable. We should see some big stuff happen in the next week or so.
gu1dry said:
There's been 1.6+ releases for a while...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea but not completely working, which I thought the new kernel would fix?
kyrumo71 said:
Yea but not completely working, which I thought the new kernel would fix?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
gu1dry said:
the kernel that HTC released needs to be ported to 2.6.29
All this info is on the forum & easily obtainable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
/thread....
Kcarpenter said:
Let me elaborate a little here:
This kernel that was released is not a magic bullet, it allows us to see what code needs to be changed to get the correct Kernel to run these newer versions. It also lets us make any performance changes we can find.
All of the changes need to be put into the current kernel source,making it a .29 or whatever we need.
It has been fairly quite, we aren't seeing tons of Roms being thrown out to the market, thankfully. Our devs are taking all the time they need to make sure everything works and is stable. We should see some big stuff happen in the next week or so.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good to know, I guess I'm like a kid in the candy store, thanks for educating me on the kernel process.
Modaco's 2.2 has the customized kernel in it now.. read the front page of the Hero forum for the link..
its very nice..
tyrnight said:
Modaco's 2.2 has the customized kernel in it now.. read the front page of the Hero forum for the link..
its very nice..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea that's what I'm rocking right now, I'm just impatient for a fully funcional newer OS
Where can I find the latest kernels for the Vogue?
Is it still from here?: http://cs-alb-pc3.massey.ac.nz/vogue/files/?C=M;O=D
The last time it has been updated has been a while and I'm guessing that this respiratory is/was maintained by dzo (Martin).
mikurej95 said:
Where can I find the latest kernels for the Vogue?
Is it still from here?: http://cs-alb-pc3.massey.ac.nz/vogue/files/?C=M;O=D
The last time it has been updated has been a while and I'm guessing that this respiratory is/was maintained by dzo (Martin).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup, that's the one. BTW, it is a repository and not a respiratory
egzthunder1 said:
BTW, it is a repository and not a respiratory
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wooopss mah bad lol
thanks!
its been a long time since they've been updated
doesn't l1qu1d develop kernels??
http://androidhtc.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=androidhtc/kernel-release.git;a=tree
Yes - from here you can get even newer ones
Samsung has released sources for Gingerbread update:
https://opensource.samsung.com/reception/reception_main.do?method=reception_search&searchValue=5830
gr8 news... )
Any new stuff over leaked rom?
XDA ♥
Really? By what do you make sure it is gingerbread?
fzn0268 said:
Really? By what do you make sure it is gingerbread?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
GT-S5570_S5670_S5830_Opensource_GB.zip
It is indeed gingerbread.
Great news! My cygwin setup waiting for this. I have Linux but do something with different way always excited
i've dowloaded it... how do I install this?
plotinus said:
i've dowloaded it... how do I install this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You don't install it, The source code is needed to build a custom kernel, but either enable overclocking or generally tweaking it to improve performance. You need the Android SDK to compile a kernel.
But, can we get the OS from this source or it's just the kernel?
Sent from my GT-S5830B using XDA App
Install Linux eg Ubuntu, down it, build it directly or git AOSP source then build.
My computer is unstable, or I can use it to port CyangenMod. But I have git AOSP source, I might try to build one. However, how to flash the built is a big trouble...
been trying to dowload this for a whole day. each time only got 10kBps speed, and resulting in timeout. also cannot resume. wth samsung????
Went well for me so here's my upload
http://www.multiupload.com/KR566WYN13
Help
Guys,
I have difficulties in understanding the given tutorial by Samsung. Do you any link to more comprehensible tutorial in order to make this update work?
Thank you so much.
Guys wht is this for?
Cant understand about this..im from sourh east asia..
What should i do?
geraldgeron said:
Guys wht is this for?
Cant understand about this..im from sourh east asia..
What should i do?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this is the Gingerbread source code for Samsung GT-S5830. It is primarily for those who wants to build custom ROMs.
chinoyray said:
this is the Gingerbread source code for Samsung GT-S5830. It is primarily for those who wants to build custom ROMs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
and custom kernels
I'm looking for newer versions of the 10.2 builds than the one from October last year.
I found some at quarx2k.ru in folder roms/defy-cm10.2 They are from just a few days ago.
But are they really valid updates or just some automatic builds that are no different than the old ones?
Still no answer? Is this dead somehow?
They are nightly builds with latest cyanogenmod changes.
Sent from my MB526 using Tapatalk 2
Have a look at here : http://quarx2k.ru/roms/defy-cm10.2/
The newest versions are autobot generated and suffer from no camera!
pgreed said:
The newest versions are autobot generated and suffer from no camera!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hi ...
what do you mean with 'autobot'???
sorry is the quiestion is noob, i make a search and didn't find anything...
Thanks
iopser said:
hi ...
what do you mean with 'autobot'???
sorry is the quiestion is noob, i make a search and didn't find anything...
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That means this builds are compiled automatically daily by a computer based on git w/o an direct supervision by someone.
pgreed said:
That means this builds are compiled automatically daily by a computer based on git w/o an direct supervision by someone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
aaa thanks.
Hi there people,
I've been hearing good things about ElementalX kernel, but from what I see there isn't this kernel for our phone, what do you think?
evronetwork said:
Hi there people,
I've been hearing good things about ElementalX kernel, but from what I see there isn't this kernel for our phone, what do you think?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why don't just choose from available kernels instead? The dev of elementalX kernel is not supporting bacon because he does not have this device.
Mr.Ak said:
Why don't just choose from available kernels instead? The dev of elementalX kernel is not supporting bacon because he does not have this device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Already using Franco kernel but why not try this one if it was possible(or if someone ported this to our device)? ...thread was created about this kernel and not talk about alternatives
P.S. I heared quite good stuff about this kernel that is all
evronetwork said:
Already using Franco kernel but why not try this one if it was possible(or if someone ported this to our device)? ...thread was created about this kernel and not talk about alternatives
P.S. I heared quite good stuff about this kernel that is all
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But you need permission from the kernel developer first.
Mr.Ak said:
But you need permission from the kernel developer first.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If he says you need then ok if he doesn't and gives his source like that then no ...just port it and say it's his - problems solved. You get into technical problems while I comment on what you think about the kernel and/or if someone is willing to do a port(asking dev if needed OC)
evronetwork said:
If he says you need then ok if he doesn't and gives his source like that then no ...just port it and say it's his - problems solved. You get into technical problems while I comment on what you think about the kernel and/or if someone is willing to do a port(asking dev if needed OC)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tbh I don't think anyone will.
Mr.Ak said:
Tbh I don't think anyone will.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
tbh I'd rather watch devs working on 3.10 kernel(there's one for our phone) or newer e.g. 3.18 but that's a different matter
evronetwork said:
tbh I'd rather watch devs working on 3.10 kernel(there's one for our phone) or newer e.g. 3.18 but that's a different matter
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Since erorcun's OPO's screen is broken he probably won't work on 3.18.xx.
Mr.Ak said:
Since erorcun's OPO's screen is broken he probably won't work on 3.18.xx.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Gather 10 skilled devs to work around 3.18.xx for a few months and you'll have a pretty decent stable core with quite a few benefits ...but kernel isn't like roms, needs fine tuning and when we're talking about upped versions there are some restrictions, you need to create workarounds for some stuff and some devs don't like to do that and since we've got no actual open source drivers workarounds are inevitable
evronetwork said:
Gather 10 skilled devs to work around 3.18.xx for a few months and you'll have a pretty decent stable core with quite a few benefits ...but kernel isn't like roms, needs fine tuning and when we're talking about upped versions there are some restrictions, you need to create workarounds for some stuff and some devs don't like to do that and since we've got no actual open source drivers workarounds are inevitable
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Most of the devs think upstreaming kernel is just a waste of time and efforts.
Mr.Ak said:
Most of the devs think upstreaming kernel is just a waste of time and efforts.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeap true still it's the future and there won't be one if we stuck in 3.4.x (3.4.x already reached EOL - https://www.kernel.org/category/releases.html - linux kernels EOL )
P.S. Sultan tried to make a kernel but saw it would require too much time and effort and stopped, if he has time and passion about the kernel this would have a much better future. It's obvious that a proper optimized kernel does have benefits(of course to match the maturity of 3.4.x is not an easy thing ...still this would make our phone last 5+ years ....if a proper stable 3.18.x kernel was around) - not sure if the electronics of my 1+1 would live by then but just saying
evronetwork said:
Yeap true still it's the future and there won't be one if we stuck in 3.4.x (3.4.x already reached EOL - https://www.kernel.org/category/releases.html - linux kernels EOL )
P.S. Sultan tried to make a kernel but saw it would require too much time and effort and stopped, if he has time and passion about the kernel this would have a much better future. It's obvious that a proper optimized kernel does have benefits(of course to match the maturity of 3.4.x is not an easy thing ...still this would make our phone last 5+ years ....if a proper stable 3.18.x kernel was around) - not sure if the electronics of my 1+1 would live by then but just saying
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think 3.10.xx will reach EOL soon.
Mr.Ak said:
I think 3.10.xx will reach EOL soon.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oct 2017
Mr.Ak said:
I think 3.10.xx will reach EOL soon.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
arjun said:
Oct 2017
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeap, wish we had some devs working on:
3.18.x for our device
bring treble for our device(not sure if this can be done) - not just have android O(without treble)
This would ensure that the phone would live until all the electronics die from natural cause(age)
I think @erorcun was working on 3.10 and then 3.18 before his screen broke.
I don't know how common it is for devices to have merged or official kernel jumps, but I remember the S3 starting with 3.0 and ending at 3.4. CM builds got it first and then miraculously followed suit in the final OTA, which nobody who cared about their bootloader ever took.
LLStarks said:
I think @erorcun was working on 3.10 and then 3.18 before his screen broke.
I don't know how common it is for devices to have merged or official kernel jumps, but I remember the S3 starting with 3.0 and ending at 3.4. CM builds got it first and then miraculously followed suit in the final OTA, which nobody who cared about their bootloader ever took.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well oneplus won't give you anything ..that's a sure thing. Usually they don't up the kernel version. You get a phone with 3.10 it will die with 3.10.
The real problem comes with the drivers of the device. In order to get a real fully functional kernel without workarounds we need the help of qualcomm, would they provide drivers so we can have a real 3.18 kernel with proper support from android o? ...of course not, why do that when they can sell you a new phone with better SoC(they have a company to run and to do that they want to sell SoC ...so you should buy a new phone )
evronetwork said:
Well oneplus won't give you anything ..that's a sure thing. Usually they don't up the kernel version. You get a phone with 3.10 it will die with 3.10.
The real problem comes with the drivers of the device. In order to get a real fully functional kernel without workarounds we need the help of qualcomm, would they provide drivers so we can have a real 3.18 kernel with proper support from android o? ...of course not, why do that when they can sell you a new phone with better SoC(they have a company to run and to do that they want to sell SoC ...so you should buy a new phone )
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If my OPO dies,my next device will be Redmi Note 4 which has 3.18.xx
Mr.Ak said:
If my OPO dies,my next device will be Redmi Note 4 which has 3.18.xx
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mediatek SoC ...good luck with that
Mediatek is worse than Qualcomm when it comes to open source roms
..but at least you'll have 3.18 which isn't bad at all heh
evronetwork said:
Mediatek SoC ...good luck with that
Mediatek is worse than Qualcomm when it comes to open source roms
..but at least you'll have 3.18 which isn't bad at all heh
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just get the version with the snapdragon 625
evronetwork said:
Mediatek SoC ...good luck with that
Mediatek is worse than Qualcomm when it comes to open source roms
..but at least you'll have 3.18 which isn't bad at all heh
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sur,I iz puar but not that puar that I'll buy mediatek(It wasn't bad when Qualcomm didn't produce budget chips,but it is way worse now in front of Qualcomm budget chips).
Btw,afaik,mediatek variant only available in China which is exactly why I don't live there.