Ran RL Benchmark and Androbench - Is it just me or do these numbers not make a lot of sense? They seem downright horrific or am I misinterpreting?
It would seem that there is virtually no significant improvement in performance with Jellybean as far as I can see. At least on these tests.
For Reference and pre-jellybean comparsion consult this article from Android Police:
http://www.androidpolice.com/tags/rl-benchmark/
Could some of the benchmarking experts around here comment?
Androbench Run on my TF300 after Jellybean:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Androbench Ranking for my TF300:
As I understand it:
Random Write: Higher is Better
Random Read: Higher is Better
Sequential Read: Higher is Better
Sequential Write: Higher is Better
Here's RL Bench from mine - not rooted - completely stock
Wtf I'm on jelly bean and look at mine
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF300T using Tapatalk 2
jeffbud98 said:
Wtf I'm on jelly bean and look at mine
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF300T using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wtf indeed. Will re-run.
Edit: Getting same basic results the second time.
Wait a minute - something's fishy here - your results don't look the same as mine - mine say "This Device" but yours says "Your Device" - so if you are legitimately running the same test and version, why is your result chart phrased differently? In fact, the entire diagram is different, color code, bar width, everything. In fact, my results actually say RL Benchmark in the upper right - yours doesn't.
Pretty lame if intentional
I am running: RL Benchmark SQLite Performance v1.3. Please verify you have the same version.
He's running antutu.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda app-developers app
I don't think "Project Butter" is fully included in CM10 roms.
Wait for a official release before doing benches. Its like trying to bench a Full version with a Beta. Not the same
toxicdust said:
I don't think "Project Butter" is fully included in CM10 roms.
Wait for a official release before doing benches. Its like trying to bench a Full version with a Beta. Not the same
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You seem to have missed the official JB update that Asus released in the US for the Tf300.
Sent from my Galaxy S2 using Tapatalk
I'm running ICS (4.0.3) and ran these tests. I cold booted, opened task manager and shut down everything then ran the test each time. No widgets on any screens, no other apps running. Here is RL benchmarks results.
Did another cold boot, clear out running apps and test. Here's antutu.
All tests were done in "performance" mode.
This is a brand new tab, 2 days old. Beginning to really wish i had bought a galaxy tab instead. These warranty issues suck.
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF300T using Tapatalk 2
There's an IO discussion going on in the TF700 forum and whether JB will make things signficantly better. Here's a chart showing how the TF300 (post-JB) stacks up against the Note 10.1 and a Teg3 One X based on their respective AndroBench scores. The Note and One X are both stock running 4.0.4. Thought you might find it interesting.
Related
I just wanted to add a place where people could post and brag about their blazing fast phones! Mine was 2304!! I'm currently running a Samsung Vibrant/rooted/one click lag fix. I also have an HTC HD2 running Hyperdroid v1.6 build (flawlessly)
Quadrant scores are retarded. They mean nothing.
Use search. There was a topic about this a couple a days ago.
Score:2259
Sent from my Samsung Vibrant using the xda-developers app.
sj_martin said:
Quadrant scores are retarded. They mean nothing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
THIS. Indeed.
Yea they aren't precise. Its just a way to show off for no reason. Its like wearing a lot of fake gold to show you have money.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Can someone explain why Quadrant is bs? I saw a thread talking about it really doesn't "work" the phone. If that's the cade I can understand that. But isn't it a way to compare android phones? An equal set of standards and each phone
is ranked how it meets these standards. Or Is it all made up?
sj_martin said:
Quadrant scores are retarded. They mean nothing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
^^^^^^^this
actually OP change it and make a rule ....no LAG fix
Thanks for the answer.
2650 but don't know what it means so it doesn't matter to me much
Willsnews
Quadrant scores are a reference
Quadrant scores are just a benchmarking tools and should only be used as a reference, just like a Photo snapshot. It is not an end all too prove you have a fast or fastest setup, but IT does provide a general view of how your phone is performing.
Remember....... the slowest thing in the hardware or software is what will govern performance. an example of this would be in a desktop computer.... you get a super fast I-7 chip or maybe a SUN chip with 64 cpus. Great !! but you have this 8 yr old hard drive and Win 98.........that chip is useless . This is why some of the developers strive to build a efficient bug free rom that performs the same in or with all things loaded into the phone. And the developers here do a super job of building a variety of excellent performing roms.
Agreed they really do !!!
Willsnews
ntellegence said:
Can someone explain why Quadrant is bs? I saw a thread talking about it really doesn't "work" the phone. If that's the cade I can understand that. But isn't it a way to compare android phones? An equal set of standards and each phone
is ranked how it meets these standards. Or Is it all made up?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://briefmobile.com/cyanogen-demonstrates-quadrants-flaws
Regardless of wether the scores are crap or not...how are you guys getting numbers in the 2000's? The highest I get is 885.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Dammit2Hell said:
Regardless of wether the scores are crap or not...how are you guys getting numbers in the 2000's? The highest I get is 885.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I get 1,200.. But I have no clue what they are doing, nor do I care
Dammit2Hell said:
Regardless of wether the scores are crap or not...how are you guys getting numbers in the 2000's? The highest I get is 885.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you read the post above yours, it'll tell you.
By rooting and installing the lag fix alone gets you 2100+
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
my score with " Super speedy ye-pa ye-pa speedy Gonzales lagFix
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
samsung galaxy s quadrant advanced scores 1.2 ghz custom rom ext 4 fps uncapped
Total 2014
Cpu. 1691
Mem 1780
I/o. 5359
2d. 359
3d. 1027
samsung galaxy s2 quadrant advanced scores 1.2 ghz stock rom
Total 3381
Cpu. 7046
Mem 3823
I/o. 3929
2d. 888
3d. 1199
Im getting it! Lol
7000 for CPU?!
screenshot or link would be nice
demo23019 said:
screenshot or link would be nice
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think it's this one:
Yep it is:
http://domarmstrong.blogspot.com/2011/04/samsung-galaxy-s-2-benchmark-tests.html
Yeah that's the link. Wait until the devs get a hold of this phone and tweak the I/o speed, uncap the gpu and of the cpu. Imagine the score then. Sanding as redeem themselves from the behold 2 and the gps issues of the original sgs. IT ALSO SCORED A 47 MFLOPS IN LINPACK IN 1.55s. BEASTING.
MikeyMike01 said:
7000 for CPU?!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah seems rather weak, get over 7500 on a stock tegra 2.
KingKuba13 said:
Yeah seems rather weak, get over 7500 on a stock tegra 2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try comparing GLBenchmark scores
Sent from my Legend using XDA Premium App
golf2vr6 said:
I think it's this one:
Yep it is:
http://domarmstrong.blogspot.com/2011/04/samsung-galaxy-s-2-benchmark-tests.html
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Rotating planets missing textures , there is not suppose to be pale planets and white background. Also reports of several high profile games not working...
I really wish Samsung used Nvidia tegra or PowerVR SGX , those two companys were in GPU business long time they can write proper GPU drivers , mali is peace of crap.
Quadrant standard works ok, and Advanced worked for me after a few runs. Im sure these issues will be fixed in later firmware releases.
Take a look at this if you think Mali is inferior to Tegra.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1060416
Oh and in my experience Quadrant is flawed. Badly.
Sent from my Legend using XDA Premium App
rovex said:
Quadrant standard works ok, and Advanced worked for me after a few runs. Im sure these issues will be fixed in later firmware releases.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its actually issue with Quadrant. Quadrant advanced and professional editions are stuck at version 1.1.6 which is known to have issues with phones running Gingerbread ROMs like SGS2.
So those scores are flawed.
Standard edition has been upgraded to version 1.1.7 which works without these issues with gingerbread. Ironically those who paid are left in ditch at the moment with lack of update
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
lol quadrant
Makes sense. Its probably why Advanced gives me consistently 5 to 10% lower scores. The textures do seem unstable, sometimes they work, sometimes not.
MaBlo said:
Take a look at this if you think Mali is inferior to Tegra.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1060416
Oh and in my experience Quadrant is flawed. Badly.
Sent from my Legend using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Checkout Smartbench 2011 Gaming.....
All these benchmarks should be take with a grain of salt.
Anyone have a SG s2 with tegra 2 tested yet?
With 2.3 and less pixels to push should have interesting results.
KingKuba13 said:
Checkout Smartbench 2011 Gaming.....
All these benchmarks should be take with a grain of salt.
Anyone have a SG s2 with tegra 2 tested yet?
With 2.3 and less pixels to push should have interesting results.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i wonder if samsung is going to cap the frame rate on the tegra 2 version of the phone?
http://androidheadlines.com/2011/12...e-to-high-cpu-usage-and-battery-life-bug.html
google stopped the ota
i just wanted to have a confirm of what i 've read in a italian forum.. it seems that google decided to stop the ota because of an excessive usage of the cpu and a battery bug in the ics for nexus s.. is it real??
Yes due to high CPU usage and battery drain. Hopefully the CPU usage is contributing to the poor app drawer performance. If not then hopefully it is on the list. The app drawer on my S is TERRIBLE compared to friend's Galaxy Nexus.
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Ok so probably they will release another ota i hope.. the battery goes down in 9 hours
Nice can look forward to me rom
Don't understand why they didn't notice in first place
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium
They were probably under pressure to keep their promise to release a from within weeks of the GN release. Hell idk
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
I have a ns4g and for those that received the ics update on the ns, Google will fix it. I'm sure within a week(s) because they are admitting fault and pulling it so more people aren't disappointed. I on the other hand have an extended battery and would gladly take that ics update lol
I dont think this is happening to everyone, I am using 4.0.3 and cpu usage is low and battery is great. Same with 2 friends that installed it. Maybe something related to specific networks or sinals.
Sad to see Google break because of a deadline.. There is no possible way anyone involved in the development and testing of ICS on the Nexus S line didn't notice the problems with it on this phone. This is something I'd expect out of Samsung.. It's ok though, thanks to devs my phone is finally stable enough..
New ICS build at the horizon? (4.0.4? 4.1?)
Ha. Thanks for the link, "Instigator".
duped topic merged
juliano_q said:
I dont think this is happening to everyone, I am using 4.0.3 and cpu usage is low and battery is great. Same with 2 friends that installed it. Maybe something related to specific networks or sinals.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree..I haven't had a problem with it yet.
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium
No wonder the i9020a hasn't seen the update yet. I hope they can resolve this bug quickly. Like before Christmas.
It will take a few builds for Google to get all the bugs ironed out. Same happened with the Nexus One and GB.
Sent from my Nexus S
it;s a kernel issue...use a custom kernel, and it should be fine
I'm having this problem. The phone stays awake while I don't use it. And when I check the stats Android OS' is eating most of my battery and keeps the phone from sleeping. I have stock ICS with stock kernel.
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
So where is the official statement from Google that the OTA has stopped?
There hasn't been one (EDIT: that I've seen). The updates are still live on Google's servers, so until there is official word or the update is pulled, there is no reason to assume the OTA is ending.
Very strange, 4.0.3 is much better for me than 2.3. What we can expect?
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
This is my battery usage today, it is quite nice, note that there is no drain during inactivity.
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk
I have a problem,my nexus 7 (as the title suggests) will not pass 59 fps. I've tried various roms,kernels and tweaks.
I'm not New to android and my sensation gets 70+ fps benchmarking, anyone know of any reason for my woes?
Getting really annoying to be honest. My sensation is ranked #1 in its device section of antutu and I want to push the nexus just as far
bonesy said:
I have a problem,my nexus 7 (as the title suggests) will not pass 59 fps. I've tried various roms,kernels and tweaks.
I'm not New to android and my sensation gets 70+ fps benchmarking, anyone know of any reason for my woes?
Getting really annoying to be honest. My sensation is ranked #1 in its device section of antutu and I want to push the nexus just as far
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thats how it is, 59fps is the limit. kernel developers can raise the panel frequency, which can raise the fps to 109. but its not real, so they stopped doing that. what was your highest antutu, i bet i beat it with my n7. anyways, your 59fps on your n7 is is better than what you get on your sensation, you failed to take in account screen size, more pixels to push.
Thanks for the reply, i get 8229 with my sensation clocked at 1836mhz and with my N7 clocked at 1800mhz i get 9815 on antutu. Seems a bit naff to be quite frank, my dual core phone can nearly bench the same as the Tegra quad. I found some kernels with the fps limit disabled and i still only get 59 fps
bonesy said:
Thanks for the reply, i get 8229 with my sensation clocked at 1836mhz and with my N7 clocked at 1800mhz i get 9815 on antutu. Seems a bit naff to be quite frank, my dual core phone can nearly bench the same as the Tegra quad. I found some kernels with the fps limit disabled and i still only get 59 fps
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i get 12000-16000 on antutu depending which kernel im using(and cpu speed), at 59fps. but its the screen size really that is the difference. and antutu isnt a good benchmark for graphic performance. its outdated and the test itself limits the scores.
here, nearly twice your sensation.. id say youre using the wrong rom/kernel
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Thats more like what i expect the score to be like! Just to check without starting a thread.... Is the latest bootloader 3.34?
To be fair i am severely disappointed with this device, never had any problems with any if the HTC devices and within 3 days of owning this the micro usb cable has fallen apart, the screen has lifted in one corner and is displaying stress marks on the LCD trying to contact google or asus is becoming a stressful task.
What ROM is eveyone using? I'm guessing cyanogenmod??
I just run stock. It doesn't matter what rom/kernel I wind up running, it never seems to be as stable in the long term as the stock setup. Since I have bought my N7 I have flashed a ton of roms to it, when heading back to stock for a while out of boredom I found that I have an up time of well over a month now. I never got that lucky with custom roms after a week or two I always had to reboot it because of random issues including lagging and slow performance, to apps misbehaving.
Hi, can anyone do few benchmarks and also point out MIUI version?
1. Please install Geekbench + Androbench, reboot the phone, turn off everything from background (apps and such) and do Androbench first, then Geekbench.
2. Please install PC Mark for Android, turn off everything from behind and post the results.
3. Feel free to add any benchmarks you like, thanks!
Also report about performance in app, smoothness, load times on big apps, and general performance.
dazed1 said:
Hi, can anyone do few benchmarks and also point out MIUI version?
1. Please install Geekbench + Androbench, reboot the phone, turn off everything from background (apps and such) and do Androbench first, then Geekbench.
2. Please install PC Mark for Android, turn off everything from behind and post the results.
3. Feel free to add any benchmarks you like, thanks!
Also report about performance in app, smoothness, load times on big apps, and general performance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi!I did it.
RedMi Note2 (16GB)
MIUI Ver.:6.7.2.0 Stable CN Rom
Androbench
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
GeekBench3
PC Mark
3D Mark Icestorm Unlimited
3D Mark Slingshot happened unknown error...
Thanks so much!
So how do these numbers compare to other phones?
Actually regarding price, they are very good!
I assume you have the 16gb model? How much usable storage space is left?
FloatingFatMan said:
I assume you have the 16gb model? How much usable storage space is left?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can't tell you exactly because I have installed a few apps and I do not feel like resetting it atm! But I would guess just over 10gb free space.
what I am wondering is if there is any actual difference in performance between this and the prime version and also if this one can be overclocked to match the primes performance if there is any difference.. I would be interested in seeing youtube videos on this phone .. but there is nothing out there yet..
b3ava said:
what I am wondering is if there is any actual difference in performance between this and the prime version and also if this one can be overclocked to match the primes performance if there is any difference.. I would be interested in seeing youtube videos on this phone .. but there is nothing out there yet..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Like 5-10% MAX difference, do not bother about it if you don't need the storage.
FloatingFatMan said:
I assume you have the 16gb model? How much usable storage space is left?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes,16GB ver. I reset my device and checked storage. After resetting, available storage is 10.72GB. After uninstalling Chinese apps, available storage is 11.4GB.
Could you unintelligible the Chinese apps as any other app or do you need root or any uninstaller app?
the benchmark of XIAOMI REDMI NOTE 2
Please avoid antutu, Geekbench is much better, and PC Mark Android....
What mainstream phones is the Redmi Note 2 Prime comparable to?
I'd like to upgrade from my dead Galaxy Note 2 and am looking for something inexpensive but that's still an upgrade in specs.
I found a nice long review here with more benchmarks and info on the device: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uR_la5ngaco
I didn't know about dragon glass, so apparently it is comparable to the old Gorilla Glass 2, which is what I had on my G2, and which is the reason I have the RN2 now so I will make sure I don't drop it again: http://agcem.com/index.php/dragontrail/15-cover-glass
There are also two reviews on Youtube with people doing scratch tests.
Can anyone do javascript benchmarks for me with the latest google chrome browser version?
-sunspider http://www.webkit.org/perf/sunspider/sunspider.html
-google octane http://chromium.github.io/octane/
Helen423 said:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That are some nice numbers.
But is that the 2.0ghz version or the prime 2.2ghz?
16 GO version
xiaomi redmi note 2 benchmark
magin1 said:
That are some nice numbers.
But is that the 2.0ghz version or the prime 2.2ghz?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hi, the score in benchmark is the same in the 2.0ghz version and the prime 2.2ghz. i hope it helps!
Hi,
Somebody to post a screen of Basemark OS II ? Thank you.