pls fix wifi tethered for cm9 or cm 10...urgen!!!
Related
I know whats wrong.. with CM7..
All i need IS ANY DEV to.. take.. all of CM7 RC1 and take the BT/WIFI Drivers from BUILD #19 CM7 Nightly and replace them with the CM7 RC1 drivers..
THIS WILL FIX THE WIFI ISSUES WITH CM7 RC1
CM7 19 NIGHTLY was the ONLY NIGHTLY that had fully WORKING wifi for my Slide..
My slide has the broken WIFI issue
any dev WHO can do this..
Will have a DONATION from me im sure the rest of us broken WIFI slides will do the same
http://www.mediafire.com/?1y0brnx6fl4nx3h - CM7 Nightly 19
bumping my post
My Nook Color runs fine with CM7 7.0.3 stable and Dalingrin OC kernel 042411, but 802.1x EAP Wifi doesn't work. (Neither does AutoProxy, but that is another story.)
Changing to Dalingrin 040411 solves the 802.1x problem, but the CM7 boot animation disappears and my Nook is slow to boot. The comments in the main Dalingrin discussion thread suggest performance is best using 042411 with 7.0.3, yet Wifi 802.1x is broken.
So questions:-
* anyone else with the same problems, or is it just me (which would suggest I've made a simple mistake somewhere?)
* is 042411 the last pre CM 7.1 kernel? (which means the above problem will not be fixed against 7.0.3?)
* Quote: "2.6.29 releases are discontinued and no longer supported" which ones are these exactly? With the exception of /051311/update-Froyo1.2-dalingrin-2.6.32-emmc-051311.zip the kernels have _dates_ not build numbers?!?
* is my best bet to go to CM7.1 RC0 and the latest Dalingrin kernel? Has anyone else got 802.1x working with this or a similar combination?
Sorry for all the questions. I feel like I am assembling a jigsaw puzzle without the illustration on the box...
Thanks
Yeah, my wifi is broken with the latest nightly and kernel. Waiting for a response in the main daligrin thread
Sent from my NookColor using Tapatalk
I've solved the problems, although I still don't know all the answers to my questions.
I've switched to CM7 7.1.0 RC1 with Dalingrin OC 063011 and Wifi 802.1x is working fine. So far so good!
ezlxq73 said:
I've solved the problems, although I still don't know all the answers to my questions.
I've switched to CM7 7.1.0 RC1 with Dalingrin OC 063011 and Wifi 802.1x is working fine. So far so good!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah... I had the same issues and had to do exactly what you did... so far so good.
I flashed the Rom of Quarx's latest cm9 ICS version.
And now he may be all developping the CM10.:good:
Does anyone know that whether Quarx will update the CM9 or not?
The CM10 might be a long time to debugging stage for normal using :angel:.but CM9 is nearly final-stable.I hope Quarx can do the final step to finish the Final-CM9.
Is there possible that change the CM9 as smooth as CM10 or each more smooth? Maybe it's impossible.
nimicat said:
I flashed the Rom of Quarx's latest cm9 ICS version.
And now he may be all developping the CM10.:good:
Does anyone know that whether Quarx will update the CM9 or not?
The CM10 might be a long time to debugging stage for normal using :angel:.but CM9 is nearly final-stable.I hope Quarx can do the final step to finish the Final-CM9.
Is there possible that change the CM9 as smooth as CM10 or each more smooth? Maybe it's impossible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For Quarx and eppsy this is a hobby, so its normal that quarx now spends lots of time with the new toy (CM10) but, it seem to be pretty much compatible with CM9, so yeah, in 2 or 3 weeks once they get tired of toying with CM10, I bet we will see more news of cm9
Its Already started my friend....
Serach for this thread in XDA.... 1768702
Epsylon already stated that his intention is to create a stable ICS first
Sent from my MB525 using xda app-developers app
From the way it looks on github, Quarx is getting repos ready and laying down the groundwork for CM10 while Epsy is still working on CM9 and starting CM7 for the Samsung 9103. I wouldn't expect either of them to leave CM9 unfinished. I don't remember them abandoning CM7 for CM9. I only wish I'd have checked Epsy's ICS repo before starting a compile a couple of hours ago.
Since Krylon360 stopped his AOKP for Nook Color project, and eyeballer is still making his nightlies for CM9, I am guessing if the latest builds of CM9 are now better than the Build 40 of the AOKP ROM for the Nook Color. It would be great if someone can tell me their experiences with both ROMS.
Which is difference between CM10 & CM10.1, which is smother?
CM10 - 4.1.2
CM10.1 - 4.2.2
CM10 is bugless.
CM10.1 is smooth but can have little bugs.
struart said:
CM10 - 4.1.2
CM10.1 - 4.2.2
CM10 is bugless.
CM10.1 is smooth but can have little bugs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know this
do you know how to fix camcorder on cm10
Paget96 said:
I know this
do you know how to fix camcorder on cm10
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CM10 doesn't have any camcorder bug.