My Stock Samsung Galaxy Tab 2.3.3 has a lowly quadrant reading of 1187. The flash website that I watched was also not smooth at all.
I overclock with Tegrak Overclock to 1.3Ghz. The quadrant reading is only 1283.
Is this normal for our tab? What is your quadrant reading? Is your flash playing smoothly? Thanks
Related
Hi i just got a score of 3903 on the quadrant benchmark on my s2, Im really happy as this phone is superfast.
Any others with such high scores??
i dont know how to load a image here, I have taken a screen shot to prove it.
When I first got the phone my benchmark 3080, out of the box. No different after rooting.
That seems a little too high haha, i only got that high on litening rom cuz there was a script which cheats and lifts your quadrant score a bit, the highest i get is 3.2k with no overclock but with litening rom
my score was 3402, also without overclocking and custom rom.
only rooted, but that dident make the phone faster.
viniturb0, can you make a screenshot with Quadrant result, please? I'm on Lite'ning 1.5 ROM and max i can get is ~3300.
Best i got?
No root, just stock?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA Premium App
Most people on this forum have tinkerer with their xoom, and at some point ran quadrant and linpack. I'm curious as to who has the fastest benchmark xoom.
We all know benchmarks don't mean squat in the real world but its still cool to OC it and see what it will do.
So post up your quadrant and linpack scores and at what speed
Mine @ 1.6
Quadrant 4513, it ran 4517 however was unable to get a screen shot.
68.772 linpack. Ranks 124 of all devices
I got 4157 as my highest on quad (1.6 ghz) but I got a 69.4 on linpack (screenshot lost when I had to flash stock images to recover, also at 1.6 ghz) ( its a GIF, so the app doesn't like it)
http://db.tt/GQ8XznI
Sent from my Xoom using XDA Premium App
This is kinda weird for a brag I guess, but I get 3758 on quadrant and 60 on linpack with the 1.4ghz 1.4.2 kernel.
So Qualcomm just released an awesome new benchmarking tool, its quite comprehensive, go check it out:
https://market.android.com/details?id=com.quicinc.vellamo&feature=search_result
Curious what kind of scores everyone is getting.
On the bonsai 0.1.6 ROM, OC @ 1.4ghz I am getting 1201
Share yours, along with ROM and OC (if any)!
949 on purely stock GT.
Sent from my badass Galaxy Tab 10.1.
951 Stock
949 TouchWiz (Wifi)
I wonder why there are such drastic differences between stock and TW Quadrant scores (17xx vs 22xx).
hoodoomagic said:
951 Stock
949 TouchWiz (Wifi)
I wonder why there are such drastic differences between stock and TW Quadrant scores (17xx vs 22xx).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This benchmark focuses more on user experience. Quadrant has very low level tests that are surely effected more by slight hardware optimizations. Also I have never seen consistent scores on quadrant (they fluctuate +/- 200) With this I am consistently getting the same score within 5-10, which is nice.
952 - stock, unrooted
1170, bonzai ROM 0.1.3 overclocked to 1.4Ghz.
I installed this rom the other day and so far everything works except the screen rotation lock button but no rom has that working.
Frst its HC 3.2 ported over from the xoom has the new feature of being able to upscall the smaller apps to the larger screen.
Over clocking is built in just get set cpu and off you go.
My acer is over clocked to 1.5 and here are my benchmark scores.
Useing Quadrant I got 3421 (best of three runs) and frame rates around 45
Useing Linpack I got 45.438 mflpos on single thread in 1.85 seconds and
71.53 mflops on multi-thread in 2.36 seconds again best of three runs
Useing AnTuTu Benchmark I got a score of 6159 and frame rates right at around 60 fps
Useing Vellamo (its new and a benchmark tool for a tablets browser to see how ell the browser performs does things like java and flash stress tests and load speeds of web pages) I got a score of 1072
These are the top 4 bench mark tools for android and these scores while may not look impressive are awsome. in comparisons on benchmark tools grafs these score are much higher them most tablets.
bottom line this tablet rocks.
If your into benchmarking and tweaking as I am please post your results here list benchmark toos used,scores and with rom your running and cpu speed. so we can get and over all view of this remarkable tablet.
I got 1291 from Vellamo using Stock 3.1 with custom Kernel Taboonay CPU 1408Mhz
same rom, same oc, similar scores XD this tablet does rock!!!!!!
Hi,
as i'm using my iconia a500 i noticed some heavy Performance issues. i rooted and installed several Roms but my Quadrant score keeps being low. right now i am on lightspeed 1.0.1 with Richard's Kernel and my Quadrant score is only 656!!!
i'm really curious about this any suggestions?
thanks in advance
kiark
Just a guess, but the cpu probably is not running full during the test. Might have to use a app to force to 1000 during the test.
Running 2.4 kernel? If so, the default intersctive scaling governor is borked so either use setcpu to change to on demand or flash back to 2.3. Im personally running 1.6ghz as max speed with on demand.
thank u very much, setting the cpu up with setcpu worked!
CPU really does not have much effect on quadrant score. It is the combination of the Rom and the kernel it self.
Sent from my SGS-t959 using XDA Premium App
IM using the xoom 3.2 rom
My acer is over clocked to 1.5 and here are my benchmark scores.
Useing Quadrant I got 3421 (best of three runs) and frame rates around 45
Useing Linpack I got 45.438 mflpos on single thread in 1.85 seconds and
71.53 mflops on multi-thread in 2.36 seconds again best of three runs
Useing AnTuTu Benchmark I got a score of 6159 and frame rates right at around 60 fps
Useing Vellamo (its new and a benchmark tool for a tablets browser to see how ell the browser performs does things like java and flash stress tests and load speeds of web pages) I got a score of 1072
naturallight said:
CPU really does not have much effect on quadrant score. It is the combination of the Rom and the kernel it self.
Sent from my SGS-t959 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
not sure on this. if it doesnt have much effect why do you see such a huge difference between 216 Mhz and 1.5 Ghz clock speeds in quadrant?