Why is there TWO developemnt threads. Which is the one to use. Very confusing.
because this makes it easier to find which kind of development your searching for as original mean AOSP,GM9 , KERNELS, miui and other original stuffs and not only zipedited roms like touchwiz roms where the rom maker just added stuff they liked without buildning from scratch
It was done to separate real development threads from photoshop and winzip roms.
Read this: http://www.xda-developers.com/android/introducing-original-development-forums-for-more-devices/
And deal with it.
I don't like it, in my opinion. Real dev threads were naturally on the top of the development forums, its not like you had to go digging. Now its just multiple clicks to check on what ROMs are available and adds more forums to the 120341230123 amount of forums on XDA.
wanna know the difference with some funny screenshots? here you go
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1219612
better stick with original. here is trueeeeeee developer.
ascariz said:
better stick with original. here is trueeeeeee developer.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wrong logic mate!! both developers/cookers contribute to the community just in a different way...
Why checkrom evohd v3 is in original android dev section? It's samsung based rom!
There is only one original and that is Cyanogenmod (they build from scratch). The rest are samsung or CM9 derivates. Correct me if i am wrong
gee2012 said:
There is only one original and that is Cyanogenmod (they build from scratch). The rest are samsung or CM9 derivates. Correct me if i am wrong
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope AOKP is also built from source like Cyanogenmod..
Wait... AOKP should be in the original section..I think
gee2012 said:
There is only one original and that is Cyanogenmod (they build from scratch). The rest are samsung or CM9 derivates. Correct me if i am wrong
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're mostly right, but it's difficult where to draw the line. AFAIK AOKP for instance, also uses the AOSP source code, but incorporates many (if not all) CM9 features. So, is it based on CM9 or AOSP? You see what I mean?
I think it's safe to say that the original developers build their stuff from source (either pure AOSP or CM9 as a base), whereas most other developers use winzip (or extract APK's, but not using the source code). That's why I can understand why Checkrom is in the original section (using a self-made OTA tool). But it's mostly subjective and difficult to judge what goes where...
It is only confusing when it seems that certain roms should be in the opposite section and vice versa.
Nabobalis said:
It is only confusing when it seems that certain roms should be in the opposite section and vice versa.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
most of the kitchen roms will end up in original section as it has something unique apart from the samsung rom stuffs
123shree said:
Nope AOKP is also built from source like Cyanogenmod..
Wait... AOKP should be in the original section..I think
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AOKp on our sgs3 is dead
It would be nice if they were named . AOSP based Development, Samsung based development. The mix is all wrong at the moment.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Why is this thread in a development section?
Should be in general
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Moved to General, there is a portal post here about the issue.
Keep the discussion on topic and civilized and this thread will stay open.
Running make doesn't make (heh) your work original.
So if I went and grabbed the CM9 repo and built it my subsequent ROM wouldn't be original. If I'd made lots of changes to the source code then built it, it would be original.
How is it you lot struggle with what the word "original" means, I don't get it.
As for whichever idiot said "IT'S TOO MUNNY CLICKZ", what? It's one extra click you numpty.
CheckROM should be in Original. Why? Apart from being the first to materialize Kitchen on ROMS (Kudos to Leomar), the team do also have its own Kernel which is the DarkKnight.
Related
So talking to my buddy about all the "junk" loaded on the Samsung, he kept raving about how his old Nexus One was just the way I would like it. I would like to have a "plain" version of Android 2.1 on my phone. I have a coworker friend that's a Linux guru that's willing to help. Here's my questions.
Can I take take the Samsung released source for the hardware drivers and compile it with a stock Android 2.1 platform? I'm not asking for step by step. More of a 10,000 foot how to. Is that possible?
Can you leave the CSC and Modem info the same and just install a PDA ROM with Odin? Or would you be overwriting all of that info on the phone?
Thanks and if this has been answered before, please fill free to say "search is your friend" and give me the links...
hallfleming said:
So talking to my buddy about all the "junk" loaded on the Samsung, he kept raving about how his old Nexus One was just the way I would like it. I would like to have a "plain" version of Android 2.1 on my phone. I have a coworker friend that's a Linux guru that's willing to help. Here's my questions.
Can I take take the Samsung released source for the hardware drivers and compile it with a stock Android 2.1 platform? I'm not asking for step by step. More of a 10,000 foot how to. Is that possible?
Can you leave the CSC and Modem info the same and just install a PDA ROM with Odin? Or would you be overwriting all of that info on the phone?
Thanks and if this has been answered before, please fill free to say "search is your friend" and give me the links...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I unfortunately haven't the answer but I'd like to add that I am curious about this too.
dalingrin said:
I unfortunately haven't the answer but I'd like to add that I am curious about this too.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll second this and ask that if you do figure it out, please share with the community.
I think that vanilla Roms are a little further away in the future. First step in the process right now would be for someone to be able to compile a kernel from the Samsung released source code that works. Unfortunately the current Captivate kernel source code, when compiled, causes issues (voices garbled, lag when waking up the phone) that are not present in the stock precompiled kernel. These bugs are apparently not present in the other versions of the source code. Once these initial bugs are ironed out, we can truly start down the path of having custom fixes, and the devs can start to focus on bigger challenges, like making the vanilla Eclair or Froyo Roms to start working with our kernel. Good thing about this phone is that there are going to be so many versions of it, that parallel development is happening on multiple platforms. This will likely produce independent breakthroughs that could be theoretically ported between the platforms, but unfortunately it also slows down the development of each platform due to the quirks that have to be overcome. I hope that, in the future, we get to a place where all the source codes are merged into master repository that has all the necessary improvements and the ability to overcome individual platform quirks, so that the development can proceed more rapidly.
hallfleming said:
So talking to my buddy about all the "junk" loaded on the Samsung, he kept raving about how his old Nexus One was just the way I would like it. I would like to have a "plain" version of Android 2.1 on my phone. I have a coworker friend that's a Linux guru that's willing to help. Here's my questions.
Can I take take the Samsung released source for the hardware drivers and compile it with a stock Android 2.1 platform? I'm not asking for step by step. More of a 10,000 foot how to. Is that possible?
Can you leave the CSC and Modem info the same and just install a PDA ROM with Odin? Or would you be overwriting all of that info on the phone?
Thanks and if this has been answered before, please fill free to say "search is your friend" and give me the links...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Check out this wiki from cyanogen:
http://wiki.cyanogenmod.com/index.php?title=Main_Page
On the bottom right you will see an advanced section that explains how to build from source code. (aosp)
Good luck!!! It's definitely not for me, not with kids and a full time job!
Good info. I haven't seen a post on people testing out the source code testing and their experience. Can you IM or point me to that?
Thanks!
rajendra82 said:
I think that vanilla Roms are a little further away in the future. First step in the process right now would be for someone to be able to compile a kernel from the Samsung released source code that works. Unfortunately the current Captivate kernel source code, when compiled, causes issues (voices garbled, lag when waking up the phone) that are not present in the stock precompiled kernel. These bugs are apparently not present in the other versions of the source code. Once these initial bugs are ironed out, we can truly start down the path of having custom fixes, and the devs can start to focus on bigger challenges, like making the vanilla Eclair or Froyo Roms to start working with our kernel. Good thing about this phone is that there are going to be so many versions of it, that parallel development is happening on multiple platforms. This will likely produce independent breakthroughs that could be theoretically ported between the platforms, but unfortunately it also slows down the development of each platform due to the quirks that have to be overcome. I hope that, in the future, we get to a place where all the source codes are merged into master repository that has all the necessary improvements and the ability to overcome individual platform quirks, so that the development can proceed more rapidly.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Also for clarification, when you bought a Nexus One straight from Google for AT&T, was it considered "Vanilla"? Is the build on that phone just like someone downloaded the source for 2.1 and compiled it with the hardware drivers and that's it? I'm wondering what all comes on a "basic" Andriod ROM straight from the source.
hallfleming said:
Also for clarification, when you bought a Nexus One straight from Google for AT&T, was it considered "Vanilla"? Is the build on that phone just like someone downloaded the source for 2.1 and compiled it with the hardware drivers and that's it? I'm wondering what all comes on a "basic" Andriod ROM straight from the source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nexus One is as Vanilla as it comes. Just straight up Android! I don't think there is anything added to stock 2.1 or 2.2 on the Nexus.
hallfleming said:
Good info. I haven't seen a post on people testing out the source code testing and their experience. Can you IM or point me to that?
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Most of the kernel compiling struggles are documented here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=740747
Mimocan himself has started some work on it here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=747040
There are also people having success mixing Vibrant ROM on the Captivate with some GPS crash issues:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=746466
I am trying to follow those threads, and since I am not a developer, I can't personally contribute to the process. But it is interesting to me anyway.
I've seen these before. I thought they were just edited versions of ROM's sucked off a existing phone. Are these compiled from scratch?
rajendra82 said:
Most of the kernel compiling struggles are documented here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=740747
Mimocan himself has started some work on it here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=747040
There are also people having success mixing Vibrant ROM on the Captivate with some GPS crash issues:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=746466
I am trying to follow those threads, and since I am not a deveoper, I can't personally contribute to the process. But it is interesting to me anyway.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hallfleming said:
I've seen these before. I thought they were just edited versions of ROM's sucked off a existing phone. Are these compiled from scratch?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The first two are attempts to recompile the kernel to put in the ext3/ext4 mimocan fix. The third one I believe is a script for boot logo animation hack to achieve the same thing.
I forgot to mention one more thread:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=739823
So we've got the source code with drivers and know which ones to use from the T959 for fixing the voice issue. We've got the stock kernel. What's left to creat a plain jane captivate?
hallfleming said:
So we've got the source code with drivers and know which ones to use from the T959 for fixing the voice issue. We've got the stock kernel. What's left to creat a plain jane captivate?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm guessing not too much. There are somethings that would need to be edited such as handling the capacitive buttons. The i9000 roms handle buttons differently regardless of the kernel so, its apparently an OS level config.
I've been wanting to work on this but I've been neck deep in source code from work.
Here is a good how to: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=704561
Thanks for the link. The US codes out there so we don't need i9000 port
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
hallfleming said:
Thanks for the link. The US codes out there so we don't need i9000 port
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My point was that given the I9000 rom needs source level changes in order to work as expected(haptic feedback on certain buttons, etc) then running an AOSP build may require some source level changes as well. It may not be as simple as building and flashing.
I'm looking to get a better handle on process memory usage on my phone. The included tools with the Virtuous Unity ROM don't cut it. I see there is a Google-supplied utility called "procrank" that can be compiled from source, and will report accurate and useful memory stats. Trouble is, I don't know how to cross-compile ARM binaries. Do any of the developers here have a procrank binary built for the DZ/G2 they could send me?
I've done a search on "procrank" here, and apparently there is only a single post on all of XDA. It is someone else asking for the binary too, and they never received an answer. The source is in /system/extras/procrank/. Some more info:
http://elinux.org/Android_Memory_Usage#procrank
Come on man..you've been a member since last year and you still don't know the rules? This is a section for devs to share their work, not a section to ask post questions..that's why there is a section called Q&A..question & answer
Sent from my HTC Desire Z using XDA Premium App
No, the rules say this is the forum about Android development, of which ROM development is a subset, but I imagine discussion about development tools is also valid. procrank is an Android development tool. The Q&A forum is for users asking why they can't change the green LED on their phone to show blue. I'm not confident the folks who tend to check there will know what "procrank" is, and would probably pronounce it "pro-crank" and not "proc-rank".
However, if the mods feel this question is better suited to a wider audience, then I will follow along.
On a whim, I checked the Desire Z CM7 nightlies, and those extra utilities are compiled and included. Just had to extract /system/xbin/procrank and /system/lib/libpagemap.so to the DZ, and away I go.
http://db.tt/s19W09j
You should already have it in /system/xbin depending on your rom...
amazinglarry311 said:
You should already have it in /system/xbin depending on your rom...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I remember having rsync, tcpdump, etc. using CM-based ROMs on my HTC Hero, but I lost that when I switched to Virtuous Unity on the DZ. That's what made me peek into the CM7 zip. One more thing to add to my prep.sh install tweaking script...
Is there any chance that someone could port/create a miui rom for a500. Obviously v4 so it wouldn't be back tracking to gingerbread. I would think it possible since we have ics working,
Sent from my A500 using xda premium
this thread should be posted in general section, or Q&A section, not a new thread in development.
Sent from my A500 using XDA
@lifecoding, hum? well the porting of MiUi is related to a development question more than an general question... whatever...
@warfenix : the Patchcode is available for MIUI, I think so it possible to be ported.
but since its a question, well then how about q&a?......whatever
Sent from my Iconia A500 using Tapatalk
I think its possible, yes, but you need to find a dev who wants to port it across. That might be the difficult bit...
Seems we need an ASOP rom, or CM ROM running on the tablet, then replace some files... well seems easy to say but dunno about when need to be done...
I will not risk my tablet right now, I need it for work
Hell im game to test, a different rom wouldnt be bad, variety is what the a500 needs...
get an ipad
sanaell said:
@lifecoding, hum? well the porting of MiUi is related to a development question more than an general question... whatever...
@warfenix : the Patchcode is available for MIUI, I think so it possible to be ported.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
um he's asking a question, not posting a rom, tutorial, kernel, ect... which is what development section is for.
So uh, belongs in Q&A. Next time think before you type and read xda rules and guidelines.
But.. whatever..
Sent from my A500 using XDA
robkoehler said:
get an ipad
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Miui is much more than an iPad. Yes an miui port is possible and "may" being worked on right now. I ported the miui rom to the pyramid for many months and have considered doing one on the A500. But miui is heavily cyanogenmod based. Once cm9 is established on the tablet there are many possibilities for roms. But getting there is the hard part and I am greatful for the people who are working on cm9 for the iconia.
Sent from a Hell Hound hoped up on AOKP!!!
sanaell said:
Seems we need an ASOP rom, or CM ROM running on the tablet, then replace some files... well seems easy to say but dunno about when need to be done...
I will not risk my tablet right now, I need it for work
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I already tried porting it using this guide. Unfortunately it didn't boot - reached MIUI boot screen and that was all. I used Tegraowners ROM 144 as a base(AOSP based) and MIUI 2.4.6 ROM - tried from several deviced with no luck. I see arrom1983 managed to boot MIUI on Galaxy 10.1" tab - see this thread....but there are no updates on the progress apparently.
robkoehler said:
get an ipad
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
robkoehler, sorry my friend but this is completely wrong. Please don't start another flame war about MIUI being the same as iStuff. You can replace default MIUI launcher and still have MIUI functionality that is way better than Android's default . Other that that, there are plethora of features I could count if you want me to.
lifeofcoding said:
this thread should be posted in general section, or Q&A section, not a new thread in development.
Sent from my A500 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you a moderator? No? oh. Then step off your high horse and start trying to be helpful.
If XDA wants it moved, they'll move it and put a small comment as to why it was moved.
So everybody knows, I have taken over as one of the Moderators for this forum.
Feel free to PM for questions,
Hit the report button if it's something you think I should take a look at.
Pax
EDIT FROM Moscow Desire,
Pax is now retired from FSM Duties. :crying:
MD
paxChristos said:
So everybody knows, I have taken over as one of the Moderators for this forum.
Feel free to PM for questions,
Hit the report button if it's something you think I should take a look at.
Pax
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Welcome great job thanks for being a mod;-)
Welcome~!
welcome
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1711137
can u look at this thread and see if the thors kernel was ever present if it was fine if not can we get the thread reopened AOKP would be another good option for roms for the tablet.
Timelord83 said:
welcome
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1711137
can u look at this thread and see if the thors kernel was ever present if it was fine if not can we get the thread reopened AOKP would be another good option for roms for the tablet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why not just go get it from rootzwiki if you want it so bad?
bfranklin1986 said:
Why not just go get it from rootzwiki if you want it so bad?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll stick to XDA. Not everyone on here has social skills to participate in forum discussions but i find that this site has much more information and the groups of people are more eager to help troubleshoot. by unlocking the thread if its not thors kernel it opens it up to ALL of xda to help.
Timelord83 said:
I'll stick to XDA. Not everyone on here has social skills to participate in forum discussions but i find that this site has much more information and the groups of people are more eager to help troubleshoot. by unlocking the thread if its not thors kernel it opens it up to ALL of xda to help.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not sure how many actually remember the events relating to this earlier this year... But it was a mess.
Thor decided to start developing a ICS rom providing (presumably under apache2) the device/vender tree to the build. Just two little tidbits were, how to say, off with his approach.
a) The device tree included his kernel still without the source code (so now we have some apache2 code.. nice but not required, and its poisoned with a closed source kernel)
b) he provided links to the github repo (now deleted and/or hidden) on XDA via adfly.
After this was reported, XDA closed the thread, Thor took down the git repo and tried to pan this off to his greater followers (probably successfully) as XDA not even allowing him in when him to work here even when his code is "open".
--
While the source was open blazingwolf, ProTekk, randomblame (and some others?) managed to get the repo and clone it (or parts of it) into their own projects.. Mostly with little or no credit, and not always properly removing all traces of Thors kernel (either the main kernel was replaced with blazingwolfs open kernel, but a second copy of Thors kernel in the repo was left, or they just used thors kernel as it existed in the device tree).
In addition to this there was a recovery that used blazingwolf's kernel but otherwise was a nearly unmodified thor recovery binary (simply a hex edit to change the title, and thus hide the upstream source)
--
AOKP is now using the CM9 base for the device and vender trees, so everything including the CM9 T20 kernel is open source. However I its up to the AOKP team to re-post here at this point and not someone just wanting a mirror with their own unrelated donate link.
Some locked threads to remember in relationship to this:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1353252 - ProTekk bit of ICS locked
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1426617 - randomblame recovery - locked
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1524919 - original A500 AOPK thread - locked
Just to clear this up, roms are under Apache v2 license (which doesn't require source release) kernels are under GPL which does require source release.
Sent from my R800x using Tapatalk 2
ezterry said:
I'm not sure how many actually remember the events relating to this earlier this year... But it was a mess.
Thor decided to start developing a ICS rom providing (presumably under apache2) the device/vender tree to the build. Just two little tidbits were, how to say, off with his approach.
a) The device tree included his kernel still without the source code (so now we have some apache2 code.. nice but not required, and its poisoned with a closed source kernel)
b) he provided links to the github repo (now deleted and/or hidden) on XDA via adfly.
After this was reported, XDA closed the thread, Thor took down the git repo and tried to pan this off to his greater followers (probably successfully) as XDA not even allowing him in when him to work here even when his code is "open".
--
While the source was open blazingwolf, ProTekk, randomblame (and some others?) managed to get the repo and clone it (or parts of it) into their own projects.. Mostly with little or no credit, and not always properly removing all traces of Thors kernel (either the main kernel was replaced with blazingwolfs open kernel, but a second copy of Thors kernel in the repo was left, or they just used thors kernel as it existed in the device tree).
In addition to this there was a recovery that used blazingwolf's kernel but otherwise was a nearly unmodified thor recovery binary (simply a hex edit to change the title, and thus hide the upstream source)
--
AOKP is now using the CM9 base for the device and vender trees, so everything including the CM9 T20 kernel is open source. However I its up to the AOKP team to re-post here at this point and not someone just wanting a mirror with their own unrelated donate link.
Some locked threads to remember in relationship to this:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1353252 - ProTekk bit of ICS locked
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1426617 - randomblame recovery - locked
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1524919 - original A500 AOPK thread - locked
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sadly i do but the thread i linked is albeit messy with side stuff i made the assumption it was mod locked. after talking with the other people i have foudn out that the OP requested it be locked. i went and got the rom from AOKP website and as far as i can tell is Thor free and i run clockwork recovery and V8 ICS bootloader.
As for the motives for my request is i'd like to see more roms succeed for this tablet as it is "old" tech people are moving to the tegra 3 Tabs i am not ready to give up on my $567.87 less than year old purchase. I own the A501 ATT 4G LTE Variant i bought it from ATT without contract hence the price
Uhm... Hi paxChristos! Welcome to our slightly disfunctional family! I hope that you have a great time.:silly:
Timelord83 said:
As for the motives for my request is i'd like to see more roms succeed for this tablet as it is "old" tech people are moving to the tegra 3 Tabs i am not ready to give up on my $567.87 less than year old purchase. I own the A501 ATT 4G LTE Variant i bought it from ATT without contract hence the price
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As do we all (want larger choices in roms).
But there-in lies the issue. We have an AOKP rom that has been through many hands, and at times, had some suspicious coding involved. Including getting closed on more than 1 occassion due to shady practices and non-GPL kernels. Might have been 3 seperate roms for all we know.
To post the rom now, would probably piss off quite a few people if enough credits were not given, even if the kernel proved to be legit. And even then, you would have several people claiming the rom was theirs and they were the original authors. That's the nature of these "KANG" roms and "MIUI" roms.
Well, we have polluted PaxChristo's welcome thread enough for now. I suggest we give it a rest, and probably open a new thread in the General Forum. I'll DL and install it, and see what's up with it. Post some results later.
MD
good job
paxChristos said:
So everybody knows, I have taken over as one of the Moderators for this forum.
Feel free to PM for questions,
Hit the report button if it's something you think I should take a look at.
Pax
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
t my a500wondering where to post question about how to root my tab. Sadly it is running 3.2 honey and I am very confused as what to do to get it rooted. I am in southern Louisiana, maybe there are folks close to me that could help.
Thanks everyone don
Hey thanks for being a mod' it is a lot of work I know. Listen I am knew as I just go
Which is the best rom & kernel for our z1?
Sent from my C6902 using XDA Free mobile app
I think it's personal preference.
First you should ask yourself if you want to have a Stock ROM or a ASOP based ROM (like CM or ParanoidAndroid).
I personally prefer ASOP based ROMs. At the moment I use PA but I think about switching back to CyanogenMod because for me it's a bit more smooth.
But as I said thats just my personal opinion and you should test around a bit and find a ROM that fits best for you.
.K' said:
I think it's personal preference.
First you should ask yourself if you want to have a Stock ROM or a ASOP based ROM (like CM or ParanoidAndroid).
I personally prefer ASOP based ROMs. At the moment I use PA but I think about switching back to CyanogenMod because for me it's a bit more smooth.
But as I said thats just my personal opinion and you should test around a bit and find a ROM that fits best for you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How about omni rom or resurrection remix?
Sent from my C6902 using XDA Free mobile app
Actually I think it's too much of a mishmash. Those ROMs are Cherrypicking from every Source (CM / AOSP or PA/AOSPA) and sometimes the features aren't optimized to work together. So I personally don't use this kind of ROMs.
These "best rom" threads are not allowed on XDA
Please head over to the development section and original development section and try them out for yourself.
gregbradley said:
These "best rom" threads are not allowed on XDA
Please head over to the development section and original development section and try them out for yourself.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mr. @gregbradley, I am happy that you was welcome in Moderators Club, I know it was coming.
Best Regards.
..now I have to give you some respect..lol..
As mentioned best ROM / Kernel threads are not allowed on XDA. The question is subjective. Best advice is to head over to the development section, try some out and see which "best" suits your needs.
Thread closed