Related
There is samsung's ics for galaxy s 2, so is it possible to port it to sgs?
http://www.sammobile.com/2011/12/14/exclsuive-android-4-0-1-by-samsung-for-sgs2-custom/
There are only few features what can be ported to i9000 cause of reallly diffrent pcb used in sgsII.. more realiable is using sources from nexus S when they will be avaible... also if samsung is working on ics for sgsII they can use their resources to made rom for i9000 preaty fast.. and here is one more thing samsung not forgot about us cause of relasing few new roms in past month even yesterday xD
Ok, thanks for your answer. Let's hope that nexus s ics sources comes out soon.
We have ufficial ics from samsung
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
there are already very good ports by team hack sung, why bother with those other ones?
Nexus S also as not received the official ICS yet, their ICS ports are weaker than the i9000 ICS ports
quite offtopic answer but team hack sung could make their build more modern.. that means go step further and dont using old kernel resources 2.6.35/7 and go direct to kernels 3.0.8... (they need to port drivers to new api anyway) only nikademus pawtip onecosmic AFAIK(I'm new here in i9000) trying to do sth with it... but i know that kerels 3.0.x works with less laginnes after some time,, its may be cause of many junks and workarounds in obsolete 2.x.x kernels.... thats my point
Yeah as said the ICS builds posted in the Android Development forum would be much better than bloated touchwiz ICS. If you have problems with bugs it's best to be patient until they are fixed.
I've just seen the news about onskreen going multitasking,,,,,,went to download,,,,,,,,,,,but really I don't know what to download and how to use it on my TF101G
As far as i know:
Cornerstone is no app as you understand it. It is something like a "launcher".
The problem is that cornerstone has to be integrated into the os by the manufacturer himself because it has to be integrated deeply into the os.
So you won't see cornerstone on tablets unless a manufacturer decides to implement it.
Or someone takes the AOSP code from google and releases a complete rom. But i think that would be a lot of work. I don't think that someone would do this. It would be awesome to see this im cyanogenmod^^. I mean both are open source now.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
I think I saw someone with a Xoom that has it.. (from Reddit). It would be awesome if we got it too.. I need to learn to make roms in my spare time.
it has to be baked into the rom its not a apk u run
I would love to try this too !
The "simple" way would be to get source from a rom, to integrate it and build the rom. But the integration step is unfortunatly not simply I think :/
Integrating difficulties is just one of the problems... for example Cornerstone requires ICS.. which we don't have.
asdfuogh said:
Integrating difficulties is just one of the problems... for example Cornerstone requires ICS.. which we don't have.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First ICS has to come out. Then we will gather our forces, go on our knees and humbly ask any dev to face the challenge and coock rom with Onskreen integrated. It will not be soon, but someday ... Hope never dies...
Since it's under the ASL, I hope that it's included into the official CM9 for the Transformer. If it is not, I'm sure that there will be unofficial CM9 roms with it. Now, Asus, release the ICS update for the Transformer we need the kernel sources and drivers...
Vyrlokar said:
Since it's under the ASL, I hope that it's included into the official CM9 for the Transformer. If it is not, I'm sure that there will be unofficial CM9 roms with it. Now, Asus, release the ICS update for the Transformer we need the kernel sources and drivers...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Steve Kondid stated he will work to get it into CM9 (that's if it come to the TF).
He has it running on his 10.1
"fat__tire: Just for fun... http://t.co/gLBPGYMW Sorta buggy but sorta cool. #nookcolor #cm9 #cornerstone"
--http://twitter.com/fat__tire/status/169628187347783681
well we got ICS. Anyone working on getting cornerstone working?
cmarticus said:
well we got ICS. Anyone working on getting cornerstone working?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First we need a stable custom rom then we need a normal version and a cornerstone version patience is a virtue
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using xda premium
^^ what he said but the expand on that we need a rom that is fully deodexed or one that has a full source code available so that it can be baked in without signature errors + we need a apk dev and a rom dev (Or one that can do both) to put it all together
The official 4.1 Jellybean stock rom for GNexus is out since many dev have ported the GNexus 4.0.4 Rom I think we might get a this port very soon.I can be helpful too
Source
I'm working on a port, but i need to unpack an ICS boot.img for editing the ramdisk: do you know how to do it? Thank you anticipately.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1740577
is this legit? or another "thanks" hungry kid horsing around?
It just some child try to combined 2 cm9 nightly in 1 zip file to get double speed...
sending from the beast wearing AOKP beuty
celestio said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1740577
is this legit? or another "thanks" hungry kid horsing around?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol it was fake nothing more than CM9...
jellybean running on nexus s
check this out it might be very helpful and tell the devs on the galaxy s android development thread because i still cant post there :crying:
they got it up and running on nexus s which is very similar to our sgs
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1738756&highlight=jellybean
I've seen this and the devs working on the port also know it(I think).
Hey guys.
I am new to android developing.
I started by porting the CM10.1 ROM from HTC Desire, but my phone is stuck at the Huawei logo when it boots up.
I can still flash another ROM, but that is not the problem.
I want to know how to fix this. I want it to go past the Huawei Logo.
By the way, I used this procedure: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1598713 and I used Aurora ICS 5.0 for the base ROM. I know it doesn't have the same version of android, but there is no reason I shouldn't be experimenting like this.
Can anyone help?
Thanks.
rqmok said:
Hey guys.
I am new to android developing.
I started by porting the CM10.1 ROM from HTC Desire, but my phone is stuck at the Huawei logo when it boots up.
I can still flash another ROM, but that is not the problem.
I want to know how to fix this. I want it to go past the Huawei Logo.
By the way, I used this procedure: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1598713 and I used Aurora ICS 5.0 for the base ROM. I know it doesn't have the same version of android, but there is no reason I shouldn't be experimenting like this.
Can anyone help?
Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Delete phone.apk and try it?
Sent from my U8800-51
You can't port CM10.1 ROM to ICS ROM as base. That is inpossible.
I know
Mlopik said:
You can't port CM10.1 ROM to ICS ROM as base. That is inpossible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know, but it is not completely impossible.
I also tried to port it with CM10.1 that you are trying to fix, but I still get the same thing.
I will setup logcat and upload the information here.
Thanks.
Need to ask something
Hey again.
I haven't had time to do anything to my phone yet.
I am replying to ask if there is an awesome tutorial out there that could help me with this porting?
Currently, to port my ROM, I replaced files in port ROM from base ROM. Should I replace files in base ROM from port ROM?
Thanks for the help.
Hi Again
Hello.
I found out that there was a problem with the base ROM.
I have ported CM10.1 from U8800! Yaay!
But there are four things that are not working:
- WiFi
- Bluetooth
- Cam Recording
- Sound
Can you guys tell me how to fix the audio? In the logcat, it says that there is no sound output.
Thanks
CatLog results
Hey guys.
I've got the log attached to this reply. Have a look at the audio events and see what is wrong. I can't figure it out by myself.
Thanks
When will you releasing it fully functional?
Working on JB
Djuganight said:
When will you releasing it fully functional?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have just ported the Jelly Bean from u8800pro to u8800non-pro, so I will be working on this ROM.
Seriously, I have no idea when I will be releasing a fully functional ROM. Because I have my studies as well, so I don't get much time to work on the ROM.
The audio is working in this ROM (wasn't working in the previous port),
The things that are currently not working are:
- WiFi
- Bluetooth
- Video Recording
I will try my best to do as much as possible.
I am new at building android ROMs, so please don't expect too much from me
I will be needing some help from other developers as well.
Do you think I should make a thread for this? or is there already enough not-fully functional JB ROMs there?
Thanks.:good:
Lololololol ridiculous!
Another porting, same issues...
How many are now? 4, 5 Jelly beans?
Ooo man, some times is just better to stay quiet....
Djuganight said:
Lololololol ridiculous!
Another porting, same issues...
How many are now? 4, 5 Jelly beans?
Ooo man, some times is just better to stay quiet....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know how you feel. I also feel that way.
I would like to build Jelly Bean from source, like Blefish is doing right now, but I need a 64bit computer for that (mine is only 32bit. Unless there is a hack for this, I can't build from source.
I think everyone is going to start porting Jelly Bean ROMs until one starts working. :silly:
Everyone is porting the rom with the intention of making ir fully working and then abandon development. Why don't you and others continue the work that is already done instead of making a new port which will end up like the others.
Like your are having compatibility issues due to your 32bit computer, perhaps our device is incompatible with JB...
Djuganight said:
Everyone is porting the rom with the intention of making ir fully working and then abandon development. Why don't you and others continue the work that is already done instead of making a new port which will end up like the others.
Like your are having compatibility issues due to your 32bit computer, perhaps our device is incompatible with JB...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
U8800 is compatible with JB.
Djuganight said:
Everyone is porting the rom with the intention of making ir fully working and then abandon development. Why don't you and others continue the work that is already done instead of making a new port which will end up like the others.
Like your are having compatibility issues due to your 32bit computer, perhaps our device is incompatible with JB...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Our device will remain compatible with every new android untill android will be using some new architecture of processor, so "sometimes it's better to stay silent".
OP, abandon your trials of getting a working JB using copy-paste ports. It can be only ported from source.
P.S.: just install ubuntu x64 and try to build something like CWM recovery out of forumber's source. If it builds, you can build anything you want. Today's computers know how to emulate x64. I'm myself using an old pentium d 820 (i386, sse2 and that's all) and I can build.
Mlopik said:
U8800 is compatible with JB.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That I don't know for sure but I believe our is. But why 4 or 5 JB around, all with exactly same issues
Now I and others also pick up a JB Rom, mod it here and there and then instead of 4/5 roms we can have dozens. Then again non working well. This makes sense?
Djuganight said:
That I don't know for sure but I believe our is. But why 4 or 5 JB around, all with exactly same issues
Now I and others also pick up a JB Rom, mod it here and there and then instead of 4/5 roms we can have dozens. Then again non working well. This makes sense?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's still same ROM with other features.. It isn't simply fix Wi-Fi without source.
Djuganight said:
That I don't know for sure but I believe our is. But why 4 or 5 JB around, all with exactly same issues
Now I and others also pick up a JB Rom, mod it here and there and then instead of 4/5 roms we can have dozens. Then again non working well. This makes sense?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because most of devs or those who like to be called developers don't have required knowledge and then leave the project as an excuse.
Honestly I have no hope that we can see a JB rom fully functional.
dark_vader said:
Because most of devs or those who like to be called developers don't have required knowledge and then leave the project as an excuse.
Honestly I have no hope that we can see a JB rom fully functional.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why you don't make some for android yourself? if it's so simply.
nagato.fm said:
Our device will remain compatible with every new android untill android will be using some new architecture of processor, so "sometimes it's better to stay silent".
OP, abandon your trials of getting a working JB using copy-paste ports. It can be only ported from source.
P.S.: just install ubuntu x64 and try to build something like CWM recovery out of forumber's source. If it builds, you can build anything you want. Today's computers know how to emulate x64. I'm myself using an old pentium d 820 (i386, sse2 and that's all) and I can build.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So I can install ubuntu x64 on my x86 laptop? Are you talking about a virtual machine or installing ubuntu x64 on the actual laptop?
And as for others: Instead of saying that JB is not compatible with our device and all that sh*t, why don't you encourage me and give me some solutions.
Anyways, I am not posting this JB ROM until it's fully functional, because I might stop development as well (getting interested in firefox os).
rqmok said:
So I can install ubuntu x64 on my x86 laptop? Are you talking about a virtual machine or installing ubuntu x64 on the actual laptop?
And as for others: Instead of saying that JB is not compatible with our device and all that sh*t, why don't you encourage me and give me some solutions.
Anyways, I am not posting this JB ROM until it's fully functional, because I might stop development as well (getting interested in firefox os).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First of all,your CPU must support x64,If it supported,you can install x64 to you computer.
If you want install x64 system in virtual machine (like VirtualBox),you CPU must support VT-x or AMD-V (virtualization).
You can check virtualization and x64 support via SecurAble;
http://securable.en.softonic.com
Is it possible for have a cm10.1 for l3 e400??
I know that there is a official cm9 by the cm team
But since the galaxy 5 (a lower device) can use it(with some lags)
Probably the l3 can do better
There have been some crashes on the official cm9 such as hanging and sudden reboots
Not saying by any means that the official team is incapable in any way(they are trying very hard) and yes that there is some devs on xda that can do miracles
With the Jelly Bean ROM coming for the L5, I hope it will be on th L3 soon, but until there, no CM10.1 for us
You can use CM9 and SDMergeE400, that combo is great for gaming, internet browsing and all of our daily needs!
you can expect CM10.1 when CM10 goes stable. currently it's still WIP though... http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2229798
You know, not even CM9 is stable for some devices, we have to wait for the devs...
maybe, but i don't have problem with CM9 for now. it's stable enough for daily use.
yeah i agree..cm9 is gud for daily use...nd wth gellmar ..i hope one day ..cm9 will b bug free ..
Sent from my LG-E400 (cm9) using xda app
wait for some year )~
No hope left i guess the saddest part being that even cm9 nightlies have stopped coming and that wip cm10 project by Deatharrow seems abandoned. No one at modaco seems interested in lending a hand either. But thanks to guys like gellamar at least we have a less buggy cm9 nightly btw we might end up with that nothing more, nothing less
yep...i want it
nikufellow said:
No hope left i guess the saddest part being that even cm9 nightlies have stopped coming and that wip cm10 project by Deatharrow seems abandoned. No one at modaco seems interested in lending a hand either. But thanks to guys like gellamar at least we have a less buggy cm9 nightly btw we might end up with that nothing more, nothing less
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
is it lg l3 or all devices are not receiving cm9 nightlies
Sent from my LG-E400
aroop mishra said:
is it lg l3 or all devices are not receiving cm9 nightlies
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All devices. Relax, rmcc is probably just busy with something else. His contributions in May have been very few. If CM9 was abandoned, you'd expect him to contribute more to CM10 or CM10.1, but nope, very few contributions as I said.
Yes I can help anyone that would make the cm 10.... I'm not an expert developer but I can help...
radio for CM9(LG e400)
i have lg e400 mobile which has been rooted on CM9. i have tried a lot for radio (non streaming ) but i cant success.old version of spirit FM and new spirit FM didn't work.I need radio on my device so if you have any idea,please suggest me .sorry for poor english . thank you ..