Database Users

*Unofficial* atrix benchmark thread

For those who don't have ATT phones, it would be greatly appreciated if those who do have ATT phones flex their kernel/build/rom!
List your clock speed, kernel, firmware, and your benchmark results. Test with a static wallpaper as live wallpapers slow down your phone.
Cheers
I'm bell 2.2.2 so everything is boring
Smartbench: 2650 productivity
2500 gaming
Quad: 2550

1.1 ghz using faux123 kernel on 4.1.26, benchmarks via smartbench are consistently around 3100.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App

I don't have an ATT Atrix but I will share it with the results. Stock UK T-mobile no OC.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

2900 android 2.3.4
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App

Scoring 2700 using 4.5.91 (Att's Android 2.3.4) also using stick kernel
Enviado desde mi MB860 usando XDA Premium App

2600 average with smartbench. Version 4.5.91. Stock kernel.

Great guys,
Just remember, post your kernel/clock speed/firmware/benchmark app/score. every piece is needed
thanks

2999 highest quadrant, avg. 2800.
SmartBench 2800/2400
Stock Stock unrooted Bell.

Motorola Atrix 1.0 ghz AT&T
1. using on Android 2.2.2 , NB 4.1.83, benchmark via quadrant around 1817.
2. using on Android 2.3.4 , HKTW , benchmark via quadrant around 2200.
2. using on Android 2.3.4 , 4.5.91 Beta 3, benchmark via quadrant around 2269.
3. using on Android 2.3.4 , 4.5.91 Beta 3 , benchmark via smartbench scored around 3109.

Stock 4.2.11 FR (OYLEM_U4_2.1.1)
quadrant: 2718
cf-bench: 9083-2434-5093
linpack: 41.32/69.41

Testing sig

.83 Gladiatrix
Quadrant 2600-2700
Smartbench 2800 production
2400 gaming
Sent from my MB860 using XDA Premium App

2.3.4 (4.5.91 Beta 4.5 Kenn's ROM) -- quadrant score: 2250-2300

Foka002 said:
I don't have an ATT Atrix but I will share it with the results. Stock UK T-mobile no OC.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can i ask how you got a stock UK Tmobile atrix? I thought they were exclusive to Orange?
Sent from my HTC Desire using XDA App

Bump 10char

I'm on stock AT&T 4.5.91 OTA update with an unlocked bootloader (I'm one of those that can't flash back via SBF until a solution is found to the hard brick problem.
I ran SmartBench three times:
3227 / 2667
3007 / 2561
3113 / 2648
I've attached a screenshot of my highest test.
DK

2.3.4 highest: smart bench 3700/2900?!?! Average 3100/2750
Quadrant highest 2850 average 2600

when i was in1.52 and use one chinese rom，i run about 2600~3100.
after i flashed 1.83 and use GBV4，i can only run about 2500~2900.

DeathKoil said:
I'm on stock AT&T 4.5.91 OTA update with an unlocked bootloader (I'm one of those that can't flash back via SBF until a solution is found to the hard brick problem.
I ran SmartBench three times:
3227 / 2667
3007 / 2561
3113 / 2648
I've attached a screenshot of my highest test.
DK
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hope a solution will be found soon for your guys who got AT&T 4.5.91 OTA update..

Motorola Atrix 1.0 ghz AT&T
using on Android 2.3.4 , 4.5.91 Beta 3 , quadrand advnce 2700Avg.

Benchmark scores

Post ur highest benchmark scores below. Please state rom and overclock speed if possible
I've got 1308 using cm7.1 stable on 806 MHz
( Quadrant Advanced. )
Sent from my Blade using xda premium

IceCream_Sandwich said:
Post ur highest benchmark scores below. Please state rom and overclock speed if possible
I've got 1308 using cm7.1 stable on 806 MHz
( Quadrant Advanced. )
Sent from my Blade using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
plz use antutu quadrant is a big s***

if i am correct last time i did a benchmark with the not so accurate antutu it was 1505 if im corrent
1) 748mhz OC
2) GPU OC
3) New Adreno Libs
4) Bravia Engine Hack
5) Wbaw`s Kernel
6) CM7 Kang latest Build By Burgerz
Will try again once i set up my phone again

can anybody please benchmark this fast?
pls say scores of these:
nenamark 2
neocore
linpack
bechmark pi

I use antutu and my highest score is 1370 with 691 MHz
P.S. How do you overclock GPU?
what is new adreno libs?

yash_p90 said:
I use antutu and my highest score is 1370 with 691 MHz
P.S. How do you overclock GPU?
what is new adreno libs?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Overclocking the GPU isnt possible manually, its part of the kernel (I think)
The new adreno libs are drivers released for ur adreno gpu by the manufacturer, Qualcomm. The ICS libs have been implemented directly into the ICS Tom's whereas the Adreno200 libs have a flashable zip.
Btw 1390 with Antutu is quite low. What rom are u on?

QuantumFoam said:
Overclocking the GPU isnt possible manually, its part of the kernel (I think)
The new adreno libs are drivers released for ur adreno gpu by the manufacturer, Qualcomm. The ICS libs have been implemented directly into the ICS Tom's whereas the Adreno200 libs have a flashable zip.
Btw 1390 with Antutu is quite low. What rom are u on?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The latest cm7 nightly (2012-04-20)
1370 btw. I noticed that if i increase clock speed, then i get a better score.

w00t
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

yash_p90 said:
w00t
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's low. I get 1600 on Antutu

QuantumFoam said:
That's low. I get 1600 on Antutu
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
can you send a screenshot for me to compare?

I don't have all the mods currently installed. Ask karthiknr if he has an old screenshot. He gets 1600 too

1685
Sent from my ZTE-BLADE using XDA

Nice. Which rom

Swedish snow rls7
Sent from my ZTE-BLADE using XDA

1882
CM 7.2 RC1+new libs
PS 2 guys from China with CPU speed 1.5 GHz Is it possible?

Which libs are u using?
No its not possible. The Blade has an arm6 CPU of 600 MHz. Clocking it to 844 MHz causes reboots. Clocking to 1500 (which is theoretically impossible since no kernel supports that) will literally cause the phone to explode

Libs from this topic.

Nice!!!! I get only 1600

Blade is my first: smartphone, touch phone, android device, i bought him only 5 days ago and i already love it

1713
With adreno libs....
CM 7.2 RC3
O/C 710

[REVIEW] Kernels Review using Benchmark

This test was done using Antutu Benchmark.
I did 3 tests using the Chainfire driver, but using a OC Kernel, the diference is pratically null. In pratice, using Chainfire driver the results is worse, in all kernels tested.
The firts test i use MIRACLE ROM V3 and after using CM7.2 cooper signed, but the results don't was expressive differents. This results are the mean of 3 test each kernel.
All the tests was done using the same device and the same sd card installing only new kernel code. Some results may be worng, sorry for that...
My next test will be of the battery drop. I'm not a judge, this is only for comparate and analyse for your future update in some kernel based these kernels for you enjoy the best of each.
Original kernel is the results of the Original kernel in CM7.2 cooper signed.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1296905
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1606352
ps.: This kernel reboot the devide twice during test.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1634604

Did you know that our Ace natively runs at 787MHz? Not 806MHz!
Sent from my GT-S5830 using Tapatalk 2

KcLKcL said:
Did you know that our Ace natively runs at 787MHz? Not 806MHz!
Sent from my GT-S5830 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This happens with OC kernel? Because it has two frequencies, 806 and 787.

Thanks for this interesting info!
The biggest differences are SD read/write performance (original kernel very slow) -- however note this does not affect database I/O at all!!! Is there some cache at play here?

With the default 800MHz value in stock kernel, It is actually 787MHz
There was a post describing how kernels calculate a thing called PLU and such which makes it's actually 787
Sent from my GT-S5830 using Tapatalk 2

iandol said:
Thanks for this interesting info!
The biggest differences are SD read/write performance (original kernel very slow) -- however note this does not affect database I/O at all!!! Is there some cache at play here?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I could be wrong, but..
DATABASE I/O - This is the speed of input and output signals (Processor and ROM) and not the speed of acess files and folders in sd card. The test in sd card varies, so i include the line with Exclude SD Results.

Good work. You actually bothered to contribute to the community! Even though some may say benchmarks are useless, its still a widely used tool. And there is no better way to test

thedisturbedone said:
Good work. You actually bothered to contribute to the community! Even though some may say benchmarks are useless, its still a widely used tool. And there is no better way to test
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tks friends. I fell very happy. New work in progress... I'll do more tests to post with here. Thanks.

wizarcl said:
Tks friends. I fell very happy. New work in progress... I'll do more tests to post with here. Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're welcome. That would be great.

Great!

Thks friends.

I had assumed database I/O was combined file read/write along with CPU etc. -- sqlite uses filesystem based files so it should also be testing file access, but again this may be cached and therefore that is the difference to the read/write benchmarks? The Antutu website gives no technical description of what their tests do — very disappointing...

so ketut's kernel is better? i was going to try skynet28`s modificated by gorolegov in vo-1 (24.4.12)
should i change it or i keep with ketut's kernel?

doper22 said:
so ketut's kernel is better? i was going to try skynet28`s modificated by gorolegov in vo-1 (24.4.12)
should i change it or i keep with ketut's kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not judging any of these kernels, but for me, Blackhawk was more stable and showed a great performance. You can download them and draw their conclusions. Both improve the performance of the device! They're great work!

iandol said:
I had assumed database I/O was combined file read/write along with CPU etc. -- sqlite uses filesystem based files so it should also be testing file access, but again this may be cached and therefore that is the difference to the read/write benchmarks? The Antutu website gives no technical description of what their tests do — very disappointing...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think so. It makes no sense to me he do a test database I / O, and then read and write to SD card, if the test I / O is being tested on the SD card.

Hi dude,can u test this kernel http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1658911, on miracle rom?

Post your Antutu Benchmark Scores with a screenshot

It's always interesting to compare the Antutu scores of our devices (tweaked or not tweaked), even if doesn't necessarily reflect the real user experience.
Advices before to perform the test:
- reboot your device
- wait for 10 mn
- do it
Configurationof my Z2:
Rom: Stock 17.1.A.2.69 rooted and deodexed
Kernel: DooMKernel v04
CPU governor: intelliactive
Scheduler I/O :sio
Readahead Size (eMMC & SDcard): 2048
Below, my results:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Conclusion: same as S5 and M8, in the top 3 of the present most powerful devices

No contributions ??
I was around 33000 with stock rom / stock kernel / no tweak

Romaur v2.0 Kernel doomlord v4

Ha ha, beat that pesky S5
Sent from my D6503 using Tapatalk

Better and better !!
Rom: Stock 17.1.A.2.69 rooted and deodexed
Kernel: DooMKernel v04
CPU governor: intelliactive
Scheduler I/O :sio
Readahead Size (eMMC & SDcard): 2048
Thermal manager: Intellithermal

nreuge said:
Rom: Stock 17.1.A.2.69 rooted and deodexed
Kernel: DooMKernel v04
CPU governor: intelliactive
Scheduler I/O :sio
Readahead Size (eMMC & SDcard): 2048
Thermal manager: Intellithermal
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow, that's insane
Sent from my D6503 using Tapatalk

Seems like you get better performance with doom kernel, now I really want to root. Everything on mine Is stock.55 fw.
Sent fra min D6503 via Tapatalk

Xernoxis said:
Seems like you get better performance with doom kernel, now I really want to root. Everything on mine Is stock.55 fw.
Sent fra min D6503 via Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, Doom kernel + Faux123 Kernel Enhancement Pro in order to use the possibilities offered by Doom kernel.

@badcrow35
Incredible
Has our device no limits
Please give some informations: Stock rom ? Custom rom ? Kernel ? Tweaks ?

nreuge said:
@badcrow35
Incredible
Has our device no limits
Please give some informations: Stock rom ? Custom rom ? Kernel ? Tweaks ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks bro
rom: RomAur v2.0 kernel: DooMKernel v4 tweak: fauxClock : cpu:2.458ghz intelliactive thermal Manager :intellithermal (better) gpu Manager: performance 578mhz

badcrow35 said:
thanks bro
rom: RomAur v2.0 kernel: DooMKernel v4 tweak: fauxClock : cpu:2.458ghz intelliactive thermal Manager :intellithermal (better) gpu Manager: performance 578mhz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, CPU and GPU overclocked, it explains your huge score :laugh:

badcrow35 said:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow that's unreal. I don't wanna root my phone just now incase anything goes wrong I can change it.
Sent from my D6503 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app

Stock Rom and kernel.
Gesendet von meinem D6503 mit Tapatalk

My z2 everything stock

This is mine.
Sent from my D6503 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app

Mine z2
Sent from my D6503 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app

vaiosony said:
This is mine.
Sent from my D6503 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow awesome score
Sent From My Sony Xperia Z2 D6502 White

Mine, stock, no root.

.402 stock non root
Sent from my D6503 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app

[BENCHMARK]Z1 antutu5.0 score

@latest CM11 nightly & delvik runtime
Version information
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Score

Mine: 44k Trinity kernel. Antutu v5 beta 1. Will post later for score in Antutu v5 final

BlackSoulxxx said:
Mine: 44k Trinity kernel. Antutu v5 beta 1. Will post later for score in Antutu v5 final
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know why I can get only 2000+ "android runtime" score in [email protected] as I can get 3000+ in official stock.
That caused my score only 38000~39000...

AlexWater said:
I don't know why I can get only 2000+ "android runtime" score in [email protected] as I can get 3000+ in official stock.
That caused my score only 38000~39000...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok. Google "Optimized Dalvik" and install it. Why? Because Qualcomm have made a special dalvik version to maximize the power of Snapdragon. And this is for only stock ROM, not AOSP. CM using normal version so it's dont use the full power of our phone
Optimized dalvik is faster than ART too

BlackSoulxxx said:
Ok. Google "Optimized Dalvik" and install it. Why? Because Qualcomm have made a special dalvik version to maximize the power of Snapdragon. And this is for only stock ROM, not AOSP. CM using normal version so it's dont use the full power of our phone
Optimized dalvik is faster than ART too
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yaeh i know that patch,but i got 3000+ runtime score(it's a normal score,i dont know the patched score) without it in stock rom.And they say the patch/function is included in CM rom so this patch can not be installed in CM/ASOP rom,but i dont know if it's true.

AlexWater said:
yaeh i know that patch,but i got 3000+ runtime score(it's a normal score,i dont know the patched score) without it in stock rom.And they say the patch/function is included in CM rom so this patch can not be installed in CM/ASOP rom,but i dont know if it's true.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cm already include this optimised dalvik runtime in there official builds and nightlies

Score = 38,793
Android 4.4.4, .108 fw, RomAur 9.1, Trinity kernel 2.3, overclocked to 2.8 GHz.

guys maybe its a irrelevant question.sry for that
but how you guys overclock the z1 to have 44K score?!!??
i adjusted min:1.3 max:2.8 performance/dancedance/smatassV2 gpu freq @ 650Mhz and antutu score was 32K !!
using f(X)trinityVengenceRom and trinity kernel v 2.3 !
anyone can help me with this?!

NiM72NiK said:
guys maybe its a irrelevant question.sry for that
but how you guys overclock the z1 to have 44K score?!!??
i adjusted min:1.3 max:2.8 performance/dancedance/smatassV2 gpu freq @ 650Mhz and antutu score was 32K !!
using f(X)trinityVengenceRom and trinity kernel v 2.3 !
anyone can help me with this?!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Seems unfathomable LOL overclocked but gave lower score than stock :laugh:
Did you test after a fresh reboot?
I can't think of any scenario where a z1 should be scoring under 35k, fresh out the box is usually 37-38k

Kendosis said:
Seems unfathomable LOL overclocked but gave lower score than stock :laugh:
Did you test after a fresh reboot?
I can't think of any scenario where a z1 should be scoring under 35k, fresh out the box is usually 37-38k
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
u sure about it?! me and 2 of my friends and my dad have z1 none of us had a score higher than 34K !! 37-38K is for z2 as i know!

NiM72NiK said:
u sure about it?! me and 2 of my friends and my dad have z1 none of us had a score higher than 34K !! 37-38K is for z2 as i know!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah the highest I managed to get with a Z1 at 2.8 GHz CPU, 650 MHz GPU, performance mode, all cores forced on etc was 39k. Stock was about 33k.

LOL, I think my setting it's simple, none of you guys haven't testing and tuning and setting again?
So far with my record , our device is 4th place, still behind MIPAD (tegra K1), 1+1 and some chinese tablet (damm they are fast, but without thermal throtting and cheat )

BlackSoulxxx said:
LOL, I think my setting it's simple, none of you guys haven't testing and tuning and setting again?
So far with my record , our device is 4th place, still behind MIPAD (tegra K1), 1+1 and some chinese tablet (damm they are fast, but without thermal throtting and cheat )
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What have you done that others haven't? Is it just the runtime?

Hey guys, test on Antutu v5 final
44k again

BlackSoulxxx said:
Hey guys, test on Antutu v5 final
44k again
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Care to share what are you doing to get such a high score?
I am on 37K!

BlackSoulxxx said:
Hey guys, test on Antutu v5 final
44k again
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what do you do to get this score? would you like to share it with us?!

NiM72NiK said:
u sure about it?! me and 2 of my friends and my dad have z1 none of us had a score higher than 34K !! 37-38K is for z2 as i know!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Upgrade ANTUTU 5.0.
34K is a former version score.Maybe u can get 37~39K in the latest version @default frequency like me.

My setting? Criskelo or KitSlim AMG, trinity kernel 1.9 (lol if 2.3 was fixed buggy oc I swear that I will achieve 47k ), KSM, slightly oc and vr 4096. Also some private tweak....

BlackSoulxxx said:
My setting? Criskelo or KitSlim AMG, trinity kernel 1.9 (lol if 2.3 was fixed buggy oc I swear that I will achieve 47k ), KSM, slightly oc and vr 4096. Also some private tweak....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did u get a higher score with KSM enabled?I dont know if KSM is useful for a 2GB ram device like Z1...

nearly 38500
I got nearly 38500, but how did you get over 4+