Related
Hi All
We have decided to build a comparative list of Rom for comparison. ROM's will be measured by the testers on 5 categories and hopefully we could get a honest opinion from the testers and not just a 5/5 for everything because they are a fanboy ...
ROM's will also be divided into 3 specific categories. Stock (Stock ROM provided from Samsung via update in Kies), Custom Original (Original ROM's by Dev's), Kitchen (Custom Original ROM's cooked and tweaked to perfection by a other Dev)
When providing us feedback on the ROM's please do so in the format below so we could add them to the corresponding list and add them to the graph that will follow in the 3rd Post.
Please try to be as Objective as possible. No point in having everything score 5/5
ROM Name goes here - By Tester
Version of ROM:
Android Version:
ROM Date:
Rom Type:
UI flexibility:
Common Bugs:
General user Experience:
Browser "html5test.com":
Browser Experience:
Link to ROM:
Ratings from 0.1 - 5.0 (0.1 being lowest and 5.0 being highest)
Speed:
Setup:
Connectivity:
Look and feel:
Theme'ing:
If you feel the information provided is not accurate please just specify witch ROM you are referring to and what information is not correct as below and then a reason as to why you say so.
Stock Rom
Version: Actually 2.3.5
Reason for Edit: Made a typo when I submitted the rom information
This will help us to update the list timeously and accurately.
Stock Roms
I9100XFA - By Toxicdust
Version of ROM: N/A
Android Version: 2.3.4
ROM Date: 9 Sept 2011
Rom Type: Stock
UI flexibility: Portrait only with no lag at all. Lag presents itself in the application drawer when running a custom launcher with a live wallpaper
Common Bugs: N/A
General user Experience: Everything works as intended, TW is quick as usual with no laggy transitions or any lag in the Application drawer even when a live wallpaper is present.
Browser "html5test.com": 182 plus 1 bonus point
Browser Experience: Quick browsing. Switching tabs sometimes present a bit of Lag.
Link to ROM: N/A
Ratings from 0.1 - 5.0 (0.1 being lowest and 5.0 being highest)
Speed: 4.5
Setup: 3.5
Connectivity: 4.0
Look and feel: 3.0
Theme'ing: 0.1 - No built in theme support
Custom Original
Rarity Rom by lilbrat
Version of ROM: v3.85, although at the time development was halted I believe it was up to 4.2 or 4.5
Android Version: 2.3.5
ROM Date: Nov 2011
Rom Type: Custom Original
UI flexibility: Works well with both TW and after markets (currently using Go Launcher EX)
Common Bugs: none
General user Experience: Works very well and very stable though I'm an average user I haven't upgraded to any of the newer kernels or other things for me it works just fine. Battery life is ok ..average 2 days but like I said I'm an average user..few phone calls,sms..wifi and gps occasionally, Bluetooth for headset when I'm out..
Browser "html5test.com": Dolphin HD 7.3.. 182 plus 1, Firefox (Aurora) while still very new (beta with nightly updates..buggy) 318 plus 9
Browser Experience: It works well with Dolphin, and YouTube Facebook ect.
Link to ROM: Development currently has been halted..
Ratings from 0.1 - 5.0 (0.1 being lowest and 5.0 being highest)
Speed: 4
Setup: 3.8 takes a while to set up..
Connectivity: 5
Look and feel: 4.3
Theme'ing: 3.5 you need to try different things out that you want to add some things work some don't..
ROM Name goes here
Version of ROM:
Android Version:
ROM Date:
Rom Type: Custom Original
UI flexibility:
Common Bugs:
General user Experience:
Browser "html5test.com":
Browser Experience:
Link to ROM:
Ratings from 0.1 - 5.0 (0.1 being lowest and 5.0 being highest)
Speed:
Setup:
Connectivity:
Look and feel:
Theme'ing:
Kitchen
ROM Checkrom revoHD v4 - By adamski123
Version of ROM: v4
Android Version: 2.3.6
ROM Date: latest update feb 8th (new kitchen) v6 coming soon.
Rom Type: Kitchen
UI flexibility: stock touchwiz. Nice and smooth.
Common Bugs: None known of
General user Experience: In my eyes best gingerbread rom. Fast and stable with the option to mod and tweak via the kitchen app.
Browser "html5test.com": i got 182 but i don't recommend taking that score to seriously
Browser Experience: Standard Samsung browser, good and fast, but tab support could be better.
Link to ROM: Will link when I get near a comp.
Ratings from 0.1 - 5.0 (0.1 being lowest and 5.0 being highest)
Speed: 4.8
Setup: 4.0
Connectivity: 4.0
Look and feel: 4.0
Theme'ing: 4.8
ROM Name goes here
Version of ROM:
Android Version:
ROM Date:
Rom Type: Kitchen
UI flexibility:
Common Bugs:
General user Experience:
Browser "html5test.com":
Browser Experience:
Link to ROM:
Ratings from 0.1 - 5.0 (0.1 being lowest and 5.0 being highest)
Speed:
Setup:
Connectivity:
Look and feel:
Theme'ing:
Graphs as set out as per our criteria. The values given have been converted to account for 20% in each category
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I hope you know enough to make valid comparisons.
Well done for trying
s2d4 said:
I hope you know enough to make valid comparisons.
Well done for trying
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well no one else will put in the effort so I will at least try. If there is any suggestions or fields that should be added please feel free to comment.
I will not personally flash to all the roms at all but will rely solely on user feedback to at least get a basic comparison going in the start.
toxicdust said:
Well no one else will put in the effort so I will at least try. If there is any siggestions or fields that should be added please feel free to comment.
I will not personally flash to all the roms at all but will rely solely on user feedback to at least get a basic comparison going in the start.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I see..
I was hoping that detailed comparison could be made.
Like themer roms, kanger roms, original dev roms.
Not just ppl with no clue making comments...
for instance, when jkay releases, numerous rom cooks just packages the framework-re.apk (maybe with png changes), plus add whatever other apk mods others have done, add someone's kernel, zip it up and call it a their rom.
or worse, mix and match apks between other releases and call it their own
Special mention needs to be done to differentiate all this between the good guys and the others.
For example, look at what hyperdroid v6 has done.
Without waiting for jkay, incorporated 14 toggles, added edt/ tsm tweaks, and make it play nice with the Hyperdroidparts to control it all.
Adding their own brand new red pill recovery and kernel, and even sharing the recovery with syah for a community collaboration effort.
Multidpi also came from hyperdroid.., smooth spinners tweaks,
updates to vrtheme via surgeons etc.
EDIT: You might want to remove quadrant as that only kills the credibility of the thread.
Well that's the whole thing. I want to list them but only the main players. Not the mix and match ones cause there are literally hundreds of them and they are all the same in 90% of all aspects.
I am editing the 2nd post a lot so refresh on occasion to see if there is something new.
I think I will stick with what we have now in the listed comparisons. If anyone has anything to add feel free and I will just add it to the list of Items.
s2d4 said:
You might want to remove quadrant as that only kills the credibility of the thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Any suggestions as to a bench to use that's a little more accurate? I have no idea what to use as a bench tbh
AnTuTu is a good bench.
B3311 said:
AnTuTu is a good bench.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
-Took out irrelevant joke-
Thanks will replace quadrant with that
Anyway ... I think this is what the OP of that thread was looking for.
Sensation 2.0 rom with his own sexy theme...looks all great..and functions buttery smooth....maybe u can add in the list with other ROMS...
Lol ... I am actually trying to find some of the ROM's and cant even find the original threads as there are so many of them for different things.
If someone could link some of the ROM's we need to list or have listed it would be appreciated.
oinkylicious said:
But there's still nothing useful in here, just some vague statement about battery life on a "stock ROM" "Battery Life: 2 Days Moderate use to 5 Days minimal Use" seriously? Or was this part a joke? And no actual mention of which stock ROM the few random statements referred to (besides 2.3.4, which must be pretty old).
I'm actually against the idea of a compilation thread . Sure you might think it'll remove some of the clutter from these forums and daily "best ROM" threads (in all honesty, it won't, the people starting those threads don't read stickies or search), but it'd be quickly outdated and be full of the usual "I think x ROM is best with y kernel because of z".
For a user to get an idea of current ROMs, all it requires is an opening of the development forum(s), pressing CTRL+f, typing [ROM] and ticking "Highlight all" in whatever browser is used. Read first post for changelog/screenshots and making up own mind.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was against the orginal idea too oinky, but it can work. I'll be in contact with toxicdust shortly and we'll get this done - promise.
You know your **** - help us! Send a PM.
oinkylicious said:
But there's still nothing useful in here, just some vague statement about battery life on a "stock ROM" "Battery Life: 2 Days Moderate use to 5 Days minimal Use" seriously? Or was this part a joke? And no actual mention of which stock ROM the few random statements referred to (besides 2.3.4, which must be pretty old).
I'm actually against the idea of a compilation thread . Sure you might think it'll remove some of the clutter from these forums and daily "best ROM" threads (in all honesty, it won't, the people starting those threads don't read stickies or search), but it'd be quickly outdated and be full of the usual "I think x ROM is best with y kernel because of z".
For a user to get an idea of current ROMs, all it requires is an opening of the development forum(s), pressing CTRL+f, typing [ROM] and ticking "Highlight all" in whatever browser is used. Read first post for changelog/screenshots and making up own mind.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Valid points. Thanks for the reply. I am using this stock rom but i should have probably added that I have the extended original 2000mah battery.
I do agree to some extent that it might get dated but when someone does a update or does review a new rom it takes 3 min to give your opinion and do a quick bench and just wrote everything down. I know it will take commitment from the community and obviously Dev's would want to boast with the Roms. There is no better way that a shootout for devs to actually go back and work on their rom to get better performance or less bugs ect ect.
Ultimately Users get better roms and there is a little bit of competition between the Devs for brag rights ofc
All in good sport I have to add.
s2d4 said:
I see..
I was hoping that detailed comparison could be made.
Like themer roms, kanger roms, original dev roms.
Not just ppl with no clue making comments...
for instance, when jkay releases, numerous rom cooks just packages the framework-re.apk (maybe with png changes), plus add whatever other apk mods others have done, add someone's kernel, zip it up and call it a their rom.
or worse, mix and match apks between other releases and call it their own
Special mention needs to be done to differentiate all this between the good guys and the others.
For example, look at what hyperdroid v6 has done.
Without waiting for jkay, incorporated 14 toggles, added edt/ tsm tweaks, and make it play nice with the Hyperdroidparts to control it all.
Adding their own brand new red pill recovery and kernel, and even sharing the recovery with syah for a community collaboration effort.
Multidpi also came from hyperdroid.., smooth spinners tweaks,
updates to vrtheme via surgeons etc.
EDIT: You might want to remove quadrant as that only kills the credibility of the thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
since only the quadrant advice was taken, how are you going to differentiate the level of development by the rom makers?
toxicdust said:
Hi All
Seeing as this tread was motivated by some other trolls in a other thread I decided to take it upon myself to build a comparison list of Rom's out there and add their information to it.
This will ofc be a community effort to eliminate noob threads as some call it so for the last time share your collective knowledge and then you can refer all the noobs to this thread every single time.
If you feel the information in this topic is incorrect then please don't throw a hissy fit. Rather just correct it in a post and I will update the 1st post. If you want your rom to feature in this tread also reffer me to your roms page with all the relevant information so that I could find it there to update the tread with.
Please use the following template to Provide information for the ROM's being tested. This would help in getting them all together and tweaking them where needed.
Version of ROM:
ROM Date:
Battery:
Battery Life:
UI flexibility:
AnTuTu Score:
Common Bugs:
General user Experience:
Browser "html5test.com":
Browser Experience:
Link to ROM:
If you feel the information provided is not accurate please just specify witch ROM you are referring to and what information is not correct as below and then a reason as to why you say so.
Stock Rom
Version: Actually 2.3.5
Reason for Edit:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I like the effort. Here are my suggestions
1) Categorize ROMS into AOSP, Stock and Mix and compare ROMS within their respective groups. Everyone knows the limitations that AOSP has at the moment.
2) Battery life is highly subjective, your findings might be considered flawed. Rather do a control test on each ROM with a few fixed apps/push/sync that almost everone uses. Post Battery usage and graph for each. You will also have to worry about screen on time.
3) Bench marks are again dependant on kernel, governor, scheduler (Please correct me if im wrong here, but i know that using VR gives better benchmark scores). Unless they are again maintained, a comparison would not prove any point.
Again, please do correct me I am incorrect anywhere.
I am actually very impressed with whats happening here.
Respect to all of you.
*post may be removed*
s2d4 said:
since only the quadrant advice was taken, how are you going to differentiate the level of development by the rom makers?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's why I need people like you to help and define what is needed so we can get relevant information.
jayerfernandes said:
I like the effort. Here are my suggestions
1) Categorize ROMS into AOSP, Stock and Mix and compare ROMS within their respective groups. Everyone knows the limitations that AOSP has at the moment.
2) Battery life is highly subjective, your findings might be considered flawed. Rather do a control test on each ROM with a few fixed apps/push/sync that almost everone uses. Post Battery usage and graph for each. You will also have to worry about screen on time.
3) Bench marks are again dependant on kernel, governor, scheduler (Please correct me if im wrong here, but i know that using VR gives better benchmark scores). Unless they are again maintained, a comparison would not prove any point.
Again, please do correct me I am incorrect anywhere.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1. I could split it into the 3 groups and then categorize it accordingly. @s2d4 - would this help or do you think there should be better defined sections for them?
2. Agreed. There are a lot of variables that could make the test vary in results and it is very subjective. Could you give more detail as to what we should be seeing rather then Battery life.
3. If that is true we it could still be useful to the extent of determining if the rom is high in performance or rather a battery saver. I truly think if its the fastest out there it will consume the most battery doing so as well. Although that is subjective but could be relevant.
jayerfernandes said:
I like the effort. Here are my suggestions
1) Categorize ROMS into AOSP, Stock and Mix and compare ROMS within their respective groups. Everyone knows the limitations that AOSP has at the moment.
2) Battery life is highly subjective, your findings might be considered flawed. Rather do a control test on each ROM with a few fixed apps/push/sync that almost everone uses. Post Battery usage and graph for each. You will also have to worry about screen on time.
3) Bench marks are again dependent on kernel, governor, scheduler (Please correct me if im wrong here, but i know that using VR gives better benchmark scores). Unless they are again maintained, a comparison would not prove any point.
Again, please do correct me I am incorrect anywhere.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the suggestions.
Sent a PM to toxicdust, hope the hatchet is well and truly buried (and not in anyone's cranial matter either...). But he's the boss - his idea AFAIC.
1 - Agree completely. I haven't and won't try any CM9/MIUI ROMs, and am not interested in ICS before an official release. Any help/reviews/feedback would be hugely appreciated here.
2 - Agree. Too subjective to bother with, IMO. Forgot to ask toxicdust about this. If you're there toxic, what do you think? Trouble with your suggestion is the subjectivity of "apps everyone uses". For example, I'm the only person on this planet who isn't on Facebook or Twitter, doesn't use Google Maps, and I don't use e-mail on my phone - I don't want to be available to all and sundry 24/7. I'm pretty sure I don't fit a "usual user" profile.. But hey! I'm special... Suggest a list of apps that you think the majority use, and we'll try to collate battery stats from there. Good?
3 - I want to drop benchmark scores completely. Individual use etc makes it too subjective for me, and the last thing a noob needs is seeing a score - "oooohhhh! 3045060604+3 on Quadrant! This must be the ROM for me, lolz"...
Keep the ideas coming.
Gotta swallow my pride - which I do gladly - and admit that this is a damn good idea - we've just got to do it properly.
I can't theme and I can't code - but this ensures I'm doing something for the community.
I can write though
OFF TOPIC
By the way - I've got no problem with the removal of many of my posts on this thread- would just like to know who's doing it?
I realise that I'm not owed an explanation, and I'm not asking for one either - this isn't a democracy, as I've posted myself at least 40606003 times.
I'm not sending a general PM to all mods, so can the mystery mod please PM me?
Once more, I'll stress that I have no problem with you guys deleting - just curious.
Thanks.
Bets $1213256990 that I won't get a reply
---------- Post added at 08:19 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:56 PM ----------
OmegaRED^ said:
*post may be removed*
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Know the feeling. Mine are disappearing quicker than Lord Lucan.
I'm pretty sure it's a mod on a grassy knoll with a sidekick in the book depository. I just can't prove it yet
B3311 said:
Thanks for the suggestions....just can't prove it yet
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To much to quote. Agree on your suggestions I will fix the 1st posts quick. I sent you a PM back.
I reported all the Posts with a "Post not relevant to topic" So that the posts could get deleted Wanted to Start this tread properly and that would just have brought everyone down in any ways
Hello everyone,
After long tests:
Stock firmwares vs AOSP Roms
Previously, stock roms was better for gaming. They were have best 3D performance with very little overclock. And sensors was better on stock rom.
After JW8, games running much faster than old releases. Even better than old froyo gaming performance.
So I deicided to slimming the stock roms, dying them. cool blue color, adding some tweaks to increase performance, replacing some ram hungry things with ram friendly alternatives, adding some good features that never implemented before, using all features with no lose from gaming performance. This was my focus about GamerzRom.
CyanogenMod is cool.
But about 2 month ago,
Thats why I stick stock ROMs1- Gaming performance was worse than stock.
2- Accelerometer and other sensors were unresponsible and impossible to play games with them.
3- Filesystem was confusing us. (datadata problems and lags)
4- Radical changes in short times needs full wipe which I don't like it.
5- Camera was worse than stock roms, especially the 720p recording.
6- Stock ROMS was faster overal.
When I look cyanogenmod these days after very detailed benchmarks today again;
1- Gaming performance and 3D performance is much better than stock roms. (System UI priority decreased and gaming is very quality.)
2- Accelerometer and other sensors are BETTER and more responsive than stock (Accelerometer delay is 20 ms on stock roms, 10 ms on cyangeonmod.)
3- Filesystem is much better - faster than stock with new layout.
4- No radical changes and everyday cyangeonmod team and community adding new features to it.
5- Camera is very smooth and much funnier than stock rom. Benchmarked both. They exactly same. But JellyBean camera features are new destinty.
6- Cyanogenmod 10 is faster OVERALL.
7- Webbrowsing is much better on cyangeonmod 10.
8- You got 390 mb RAM + 720p recording with devil kernel. (Which is 364 mb ram on stock)
9- You can take videos with front cam on cyanogenmod 10.
10- Instantly getting new updates from google to our device. (Latest android features)
11- HW Acceleration is very important for todays devices. Gingerbread is totally crap for most of apps including tapatalk.
12- Sound quality is much better on AOSP roms and you got more chance to tweak it.
13- There are too much reasons that I don't really remember.
14- Touchscreen is much responsive on this one.
For sure, I got my own codes and implementions for AOSP roms. But I have a crappy PC which running a 32 bit Arch-Linux.
Sadly, I need a 64-bit PC and can't compile ROM's on 32 bit PC.
I think from now I can't make more than cyanogenmod team and I highly recommend my users to switching Cyanogenmod 10.
Only negative effects of cyanogenmod is;
- You can't make video calls
That's all.
My suggestion for a combiantion.
-Latest CyanogenMod nightly.
-Devil kernel
As I reminded. You have no reasons to stay on crappy gingerbread with a half hw-accelerated browser.
Upgrade your phone now...
And if you want to donate me because of works I did until today, please donate derteufel1980 or pawitp. Because they doing much more than me.
About GameBooster etc.. We are working like a hurricane. You will get what you paid and much more. Thanks for supporting us.
IMPORTANT:
- Give your blessings.
- Renounce your rights for me in this.
(Or how we must tell this in English. That's just important about my religion.)
burakgon said:
Hello everyone,
After long tests:
Stock firmwares vs AOSP Roms
Previously, stock roms was better for gaming. They were have best 3D performance with very little overclock. And sensors was better on stock rom.
After JW8, games running much faster than old releases. Even better than old froyo gaming performance.
So I deicided to slimming the stock roms, dying them. cool blue color, adding some tweaks to increase performance, replacing some ram hungry things with ram friendly alternatives, adding some good features that never implemented before, using all features with no lose from gaming performance. This was my focus about GamerzRom.
CyanogenMod is cool.
But about 2 month ago,
Thats why I stick stock ROMs1- Gaming performance was worse than stock.
2- Accelerometer and other sensors were unresponsible and impossible to play games with them.
3- Filesystem was confusing us. (datadata problems and lags)
4- Radical changes in short times needs full wipe which I don't like it.
5- Camera was worse than stock roms, especially the 720p recording.
6- Stock ROMS was faster overal.
When I look cyanogenmod these days after very detailed benchmarks today again;
1- Gaming performance and 3D performance is much better than stock roms. (System UI priority decreased and gaming is very quality.)
2- Accelerometer and other sensors are BETTER and more responsive than stock (Accelerometer delay is 20 ms on stock roms, 10 ms on cyangeonmod.)
3- Filesystem is much better - faster than stock with new layout.
4- No radical changes and everyday cyangeonmod team and community adding new features to it.
5- Camera is very smooth and much funnier than stock rom. Benchmarked both. They exactly same. But JellyBean camera features are new destinty.
6- Cyanogenmod 10 is faster OVERALL.
7- Webbrowsing is much better on cyangeonmod 10.
8- You got 390 mb RAM + 720p recording with devil kernel. (Which is 364 mb ram on stock)
9- You can take videos with front cam on cyanogenmod 10.
10- Instantly getting new updates from google to our device. (Latest android features)
11- HW Acceleration is very important for todays devices. Gingerbread is totally crap for most of apps including tapatalk.
12- Sound quality is much better on AOSP roms and you got more chance to tweak it.
13- There are too much reasons that I don't really remember.
14- Touchscreen is much responsive on this one.
For sure, I got my own codes and implementions for AOSP roms. But I have a crappy PC which running a 32 bit Arch-Linux.
Sadly, I need a 64-bit PC and can't compile ROM's on 32 bit PC.
I think from now I can't make more than cyanogenmod team and I highly recommend my users to switching Cyanogenmod 10.
Only negative effects of cyanogenmod is;
- You can't make video calls
That's all.
My suggestion for a combiantion.
-Latest CyanogenMod nightly.
-Devil kernel
As I reminded. You have no reasons to stay on crappy gingerbread with a half hw-accelerated browser.
Upgrade your phone now...
And if you want to donate me because of works I did until today, please donate derteufel1980 or pawitp. Because they doing much more than me.
About GameBooster etc.. We are working like a hurricane. You will get what you paid and much more. Thanks for supporting us.
IMPORTANT:
- Give your blessings.
- Renounce your rights for me in this.
(Or how we must tell this in English. That's just important about my religion.)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe i can help you with building.
I have resourses for that butt only thing is i cannot provide you remote access.
Send me a pm.
I appreciate all ur work and tbh all ur roms were as great as you, hope u keep on development in general, wish u all the luck.
I will give a try to Gamezrom I am using CM9 and I am very satisfied!
Hey Guys,
As we got now some quite impressive selection of both android 2.3 and android 2.2 and even some android 4.x based ROMs, I was actually thinking about opening this discussion-thread to see what arguments can be brought forth for the named android versions on our galaxy 3.
It should help others to decide which ROMs based on which android version is the right one for them and to clarify the differences between these android versions.
This thread should NOT in any kind of way devalue the works of any developer on any newer or older android version, because it’s actually them that keep our legacy devices alive! Instead I’m hoping to see some different perspectives and experiences that you have made with the ROMs based on different android versions on our galaxy 3!
To start this discussion I summed up the features that are highlighted by Google for Gingerbread on http://developer.android.com/about/versions/android-2.3-highlights.html to question those benefits according to our present status of android 2.3-based ROMs:
- improved user interface for simplicity and speed through changed menus
- Better and faster keyboard experience
- Improved power management through visualization of battery consumption and better managing of apps
- Internet calling and NFC-capability (NFC not for our phone)
- Enhancements for gaming through performance optimization (concurrent garbage collector, faster event distribution, updated video drivers)
- Native development optimizations (audio, graphic, sensors)
- Dalvik runtime optimizations
As I selected only some of the newer features to sum up I tried it without regarding my personal opinion, but as selections and accumulations always mirror my personal perspective regarding what is important and what not, feel free to add any features that you find important and do question the things that I’ve mentioned.
Looking at the newer features I ask myself, will we actually benefit from those compared to a Froyo-ROM (maybe also thinking about missing implementation of OpenGL ES 2.0 in android 2.3 – correct me if I’m wrong)?
Are those newer improved user interfaces an argument? Thinking about the modding and themes which our themers provided to make our SG3 a beautiful device!
What of these features improved your personal user and/or developer experience over android 2.2 on our phone?
Did you notice those differences?
So hoping for some different perspectives: let the discussion begin!
(As I said, feel free to criticize and question anything that I’ve mentioned)
Hi guys,
I am new in xda. I was searching a good bugless rom with support xposed.
I am using note 3 n9005. 32 gb. lollipop. Thanks in advanced.
Mr:L said:
Hi guys,
I am new in xda. I was searching a good bugless rom with support xposed.
I am using note 3 n9005. 32 gb. lollipop. Thanks in advanced.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
? rom is best
Stay with stock rom because customized roms cuts a lot of samsung functions like spen and gestures goodies
Mr:L said:
Hi guys,
I am new in xda. I was searching a good bugless rom with support xposed.
I am using note 3 n9005. 32 gb. lollipop. Thanks in advanced.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Welcome to XDA.
I suggest you enter the development section and do like most of us - flash like a maniac until you find a ROM that suits your needs, looks the way you want, feels the way you want.
Still, let me sum it up. These are the main categories of ROMs for our beloved N9005:
1. TouchWiz ROMs.
Those are ROMs based on the official firmware that Samsung released for our phones. They keep between most and all features and apps that are originally offered by Samsung, and then some extras like even better battery life, slightly better camera shots with higher quality, to some small extent they're themed.
tl;dr
Pros:
+ Stable.
+ Good battery life.
+ All the functionality is kept.
Cons:
- In my opinion, while quite functional, TouchWiz is ugly as hell.
- Can be somewhat laggy at times.
- You can't mod as much as you want to.
2. AOSP ROMs.?
Those are ROMs based on the Android Open Source Project. Basically, these ROMs turn your device into a Nexus device and strive to bring the pure Android experience. Those ROMs are fast as hell, responsive, and very, VERY easily modified. On the other hand, those are ROMs made by enthusiasts, in some cases professional developers. Still, ROMs that are made from the ground up, and are largely still works in progress.
tl;dr
Pros:
+ Your phone running an AOSP ROM will be way faster than TouchWiz.
+ NO bloatware. I mean, all that Samsung bulls**t like ChatOn, Samsung Hub/Apps/Link/Group Play/Trip Advisor and some 20 others are NOT present on AOSP ROMs.
+ Much more open to modifications, including the way even non-system apps look. Like, you can have a dark themed Facebook and Instagram and whatever you use.
Cons:
- Battery life on those ROMs is generally not as good as on TouchWiz.
- While the phone is way faster, the camera experience is also not as good as on TouchWiz. The camera starts quite slowly and while the shots it takes are not bad, those taken on TouchWiz are visibly better.
- Like I said above, those ROMs are works in progress and may have bugs and while most of them are with status Stable by now and most major bugs are not present anymore, there might still be some annoyances.
3. Ported ROMs.
Those are ROMs based on firmwares originally made for other devices, in our case mostly other Samsung devices. The Note 4 (soon Note 5) and S6 have functionality not present even on stock ROMs, like the Galaxy S6's Theme Store. That way with a ported ROM you have access to that functionality while keeping all of the original functionality.
Pros:
+ Added even more functions.
+ With ported ROMs you can experience to an extent new devices without actually having to buy them.
Cons:
- Might be buggy. Making another phone's firmware work on yours is no easy task.
- Battery life might be strange. Good on some days and downright miserable on others. xD
Final instructions:
1. Welcome to XDA.
2. Read A LOT. When choosing a ROM, read EVERYTHING in the ROM thread's original post, and if there is something you want to know but is not answered in the original post, search through the thread, 95% of the cases someone else has asked your question and it has been answered.
3. After reading a lot and you believe you're ready for action, READ IT ALL OVER AGAIN.
4. When you're absolutely sure you're ready, start flashing.
gg gl hf
sirobelec said:
Welcome to XDA.
I suggest you enter the development section and do like most of us - flash like a maniac until you find a ROM that suits your needs, looks the way you want, feels the way you want.
Still, let me sum it up. These are the main categories of ROMs for our beloved N9005:
1. TouchWiz ROMs.
Those are ROMs based on the official firmware that Samsung released for our phones. They keep between most and all features and apps that are originally offered by Samsung, and then some extras like even better battery life, slightly better camera shots with higher quality, to some small extent they're themed.
tl;dr
Pros:
+ Stable.
+ Good battery life.
+ All the functionality is kept.
Cons:
- In my opinion, while quite functional, TouchWiz is ugly as hell.
- Can be somewhat laggy at times.
- You can't mod as much as you want to.
2. AOSP ROMs.?
Those are ROMs based on the Android Open Source Project. Basically, these ROMs turn your device into a Nexus device and strive to bring the pure Android experience. Those ROMs are fast as hell, responsive, and very, VERY easily modified. On the other hand, those are ROMs made by enthusiasts, in some cases professional developers. Still, ROMs that are made from the ground up, and are largely still works in progress.
tl;dr
Pros:
+ Your phone running an AOSP ROM will be way faster than TouchWiz.
+ NO bloatware. I mean, all that Samsung bulls**t like ChatOn, Samsung Hub/Apps/Link/Group Play/Trip Advisor and some 20 others are NOT present on AOSP ROMs.
+ Much more open to modifications, including the way even non-system apps look. Like, you can have a dark themed Facebook and Instagram and whatever you use.
Cons:
- Battery life on those ROMs is generally not as good as on TouchWiz.
- While the phone is way faster, the camera experience is also not as good as on TouchWiz. The camera starts quite slowly and while the shots it takes are not bad, those taken on TouchWiz are visibly better.
- Like I said above, those ROMs are works in progress and may have bugs and while most of them are with status Stable by now and most major bugs are not present anymore, there might still be some annoyances.
3. Ported ROMs.
Those are ROMs based on firmwares originally made for other devices, in our case mostly other Samsung devices. The Note 4 (soon Note 5) and S6 have functionality not present even on stock ROMs, like the Galaxy S6's Theme Store. That way with a ported ROM you have access to that functionality while keeping all of the original functionality.
Pros:
+ Added even more functions.
+ With ported ROMs you can experience to an extent new devices without actually having to buy them.
Cons:
- Might be buggy. Making another phone's firmware work on yours is no easy task.
- Battery life might be strange. Good on some days and downright miserable on others. xD
Final instructions:
1. Welcome to XDA.
2. Read A LOT. When choosing a ROM, read EVERYTHING in the ROM thread's original post, and if there is something you want to know but is not answered in the original post, search through the thread, 95% of the cases someone else has asked your question and it has been answered.
3. After reading a lot and you believe you're ready for action, READ IT ALL OVER AGAIN.
4. When you're absolutely sure you're ready, start flashing.
gg gl hf
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks bro! :angel: you just answered my all question.
sirobelec said:
Welcome to XDA.
I suggest you enter the development section and do like most of us - flash like a maniac until you find a ROM that suits your needs, looks the way you want, feels the way you want.
Still, let me sum it up. These are the main categories of ROMs for our beloved N9005:
1. TouchWiz ROMs.
Those are ROMs based on the official firmware that Samsung released for our phones. They keep between most and all features and apps that are originally offered by Samsung, and then some extras like even better battery life, slightly better camera shots with higher quality, to some small extent they're themed.
tl;dr
Pros:
+ Stable.
+ Good battery life.
+ All the functionality is kept.
Cons:
- In my opinion, while quite functional, TouchWiz is ugly as hell.
- Can be somewhat laggy at times.
- You can't mod as much as you want to.
2. AOSP ROMs.?
Those are ROMs based on the Android Open Source Project. Basically, these ROMs turn your device into a Nexus device and strive to bring the pure Android experience. Those ROMs are fast as hell, responsive, and very, VERY easily modified. On the other hand, those are ROMs made by enthusiasts, in some cases professional developers. Still, ROMs that are made from the ground up, and are largely still works in progress.
tl;dr
Pros:
+ Your phone running an AOSP ROM will be way faster than TouchWiz.
+ NO bloatware. I mean, all that Samsung bulls**t like ChatOn, Samsung Hub/Apps/Link/Group Play/Trip Advisor and some 20 others are NOT present on AOSP ROMs.
+ Much more open to modifications, including the way even non-system apps look. Like, you can have a dark themed Facebook and Instagram and whatever you use.
Cons:
- Battery life on those ROMs is generally not as good as on TouchWiz.
- While the phone is way faster, the camera experience is also not as good as on TouchWiz. The camera starts quite slowly and while the shots it takes are not bad, those taken on TouchWiz are visibly better.
- Like I said above, those ROMs are works in progress and may have bugs and while most of them are with status Stable by now and most major bugs are not present anymore, there might still be some annoyances.
3. Ported ROMs.
Those are ROMs based on firmwares originally made for other devices, in our case mostly other Samsung devices. The Note 4 (soon Note 5) and S6 have functionality not present even on stock ROMs, like the Galaxy S6's Theme Store. That way with a ported ROM you have access to that functionality while keeping all of the original functionality.
Pros:
+ Added even more functions.
+ With ported ROMs you can experience to an extent new devices without actually having to buy them.
Cons:
- Might be buggy. Making another phone's firmware work on yours is no easy task.
- Battery life might be strange. Good on some days and downright miserable on others. xD
Final instructions:
1. Welcome to XDA.
2. Read A LOT. When choosing a ROM, read EVERYTHING in the ROM thread's original post, and if there is something you want to know but is not answered in the original post, search through the thread, 95% of the cases someone else has asked your question and it has been answered.
3. After reading a lot and you believe you're ready for action, READ IT ALL OVER AGAIN.
4. When you're absolutely sure you're ready, start flashing.
gg gl hf
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
great great great advise and good rom listing advise
I will probably get my newly ordered Note 4 (N910G) tomorrow, and I want to go straight to business with a good ROM and kernel. I was using Arya Mod on Note 3 and it was an excellent ROM, full with features, but more importantly based on stock, and that's what I am looking here too, completely based on official stock firmware but with features added, features like Priority sender, Delayed message timer for stock messaging app, no gap for the notification toggle area etc., anyone who has used Arya will know what I am talking about. So if there is a ROM like that please do suggest me. I don't/won't change ROM often, so it has to be stable as hell too.
And a kernel also please. Stability is the key factor here too, but next preference is performance, I don't care about batter life at all, so total smoothness (can't stand micro jitters) is the target here and if possible then features like Touch2Wake etc. are welcome. I used a kernel called Shinto on my Note 3 and it was butter smooth with Precognition governor, just so you know.
So please, shoot me.
PS: The ROM has to be Deodexed, cause I will use Xposed.
ithehappy said:
I will probably get my newly ordered Note 4 (N910G) tomorrow, and I want to go straight to business with a good ROM and kernel. I was using Arya Mod on Note 3 and it was an excellent ROM, full with features, but more importantly based on stock, and that's what I am looking here too, completely based on official stock firmware but with features added, features like Priority sender, Delayed message timer for stock messaging app, no gap for the notification toggle area etc., anyone who has used Arya will know what I am talking about. So if there is a ROM like that please do suggest me. I don't/won't change ROM often, so it has to be stable as hell too.
And a kernel also please. Stability is the key factor here too, but next preference is performance, I don't care about batter life at all, so total smoothness (can't stand micro jitters) is the target here and if possible then features like Touch2Wake etc. are welcome. I used a kernel called Shinto on my Note 3 and it was butter smooth with Precognition governor, just so you know.
So please, shoot me.
PS: The ROM has to be Deodexed, cause I will use Xposed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can't suggest anything, but here's what I want to share....
Samsung is making his device complicated (from what I see)....
If you try to compare from Note2 up to Note 4, samsung is trying to classify its device into country /region (due to network frequency or any other reason). And Note 4 has more different models compare to Note 2 and Note 3.
and if you notice, each model got fewer custom ROM (if you try to compare with earlier device).
This is my reason why I never root and change into custom ROM, and only after almost 1 year, then I decide to root to play with my note 4.
If you are a TW lover just like me, you will find very few ROM and/or kernel available for snapdragon G series.
So, ...
with a very few ROM/kernel, I think it will be good for you to try it one by one and find the one suit u better.
Cheers,
Thanks. I flashed a very popular ROM but unfortunately it doesn't have what I need, the Delayed sending option in Stock messaging app. I need that option very badly.
Could anyone please tell me whether there is a custom ROM based on stock purely which has that feature enabled?