I have been browsing the Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development section for sometimes, now that we have official ICS, and we have handful of custom Rom/ kernel already in development
Is the ICS capable of OC/UV just as the AbyssNote Kernel.
Thanks
Haw high was a regular OC under ginger breath ?
I have my note a week now so I never tried, but what was possible?
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA
We have no functional custom kernels and won't until source code drops.
DAFUQ and WizDom's kernel sort of work, but had even more compatibility problems with XXLPY than they did with leaks. (no wifi, no hwaccel for video, no speakerphone).
CoopZor said:
Haw high was a regular OC under ginger breath ?
I have my note a week now so I never tried, but what was possible?
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
capable of goings 1704 mhz but I have mine stable @1664 mhz with 1350mhv
Related
This kernel is a custom, OC/UV kernel for CM7.
Change Log:
0.6:
Fixed to include slayhers audio call fix
0.5
Merge up to 2.6.32.39
Got wifi module functioning (was broken in 0.3-0.4)
Smart Ass Governor added
Interactive Governor added
Initial release
Same UV/OC settings from my BFS kernel
CFS Tweaks
2.6.32.21 for now, as upping the version breaks some stuff for now, but I will be updating to 2.6.32.39 eventually.
Tiny RCU
SLQB memory allocator
BFQ I/O Scheduler
Defaults to 1036800Mhz (1.036Ghz)
More to come as I have more time.
This is the last week of school before finals, so I'm not sure what I'll have time for for now, please, be patient and bare with me
Download Link:
http://bit.ly/jLFm47
Flash Via CWM
Yes, I comply with GPL. Here's my source for this kernel:
http://bit.ly/gBdSBS
To do list in second post.
To Do List:
Fix WPA2 Wifi
Backport 2.6.38 Interactive Governor
Backport 2.6.39 OnDemand Governor
Add BFS option
Going to park here, also
Nice! Downloading to test now.
Yes!!
Sent from my ThunderBolt using XDA App
Awesome work man. The phone was fast before but now it's just stupid fast.
Sent from my ThunderBolt using XDA App
Is there anyway the slots up to 1.41 could be added? I've been meaning to learn about kernels, so if this is a lot of work don't worry. Thanks for your hard work
Sent from my ThunderBolt using XDA Premium App
Jazi said:
Is there anyway the slots up to 1.41 could be added? I've been meaning to learn about kernels, so if this is a lot of work don't worry. Thanks for your hard work
Sent from my ThunderBolt using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
slots go up to 1.8ghz, but the 1.4ghz slot is 1.45, i'll add 1.41 when i get a chance
Thanks a ton Drod. Loved your Sense kernels. CM7 is now my daily, thanks in part to this kernel.
Thanks, it seems like that is the magic number where voltage meet performance before diminishing returns. Ill be on irc later too, great work man.
Sent from my ThunderBolt using XDA Premium App
I have to say... this kernel runs pretty damn good on CM. Its a nice peak into what CM7 does when a lil freq and voltage is applied Thanks again Drod
Fantastic kernal! Thanks a ton!
Just fyi, this kernel is pretty stable. I think it's better than the "stock" cm7 kernel st this point. And it performs tons better than the leankernel pre-release. I just wish this had the custom governors. But for now, I don't have much of an option, this is my kernel of choice.
Drod, well done so quickly!
And while nobody cares, I was able to get over 2700 with this kernel in Quadrant without any cheats. Good to know it's that stable and speedy!
Sent from my ThunderBolt using XDA App
Jaxidian said:
Just fyi, this kernel is pretty stable. I think it's better than the "stock" cm7 kernel st this point. And it performs tons better than the leankernel pre-release. I just wish this had the custom governors. But for now, I don't have much of an option, this is my kernel of choice.
Drod, well done so quickly!
And while nobody cares, I was able to get over 2700 with this kernel in Quadrant without any cheats. Good to know it's that stable and speedy!
Sent from my ThunderBolt using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks
Governors are to come. Gonna work on that some tomorrow after class or before I do my nights studying
Working great thanks!!!
I'll be installing later today Thanks!
Is anyone else having issues with GPS in this kernel? I flashed to one that came with cm package and it worked again
jmstumme said:
Is anyone else having issues with GPS in this kernel? I flashed to one that came with cm package and it worked again
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
GPS wouldn't be affected by the kernel
I gonna go ahead and say this is kernel related....
my phone is charging wayyyyyy too fast and im pretty sure the readings are inaccurate..
14%-57%......
7minutes...
Nikolai2.1 said:
I gonna go ahead and say this is kernel related....
my phone is charging wayyyyyy too fast and im pretty sure the readings are inaccurate..
14%-57%......
7minutes...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm I am not having that problem
Bolted.....
I do know that benchmarks sometimes say something, sometimes not. But I also know that many of you are interested in scores, and because a new major version of the grandmother of benchmarks, quadrant, has just been released...
My score is based on stock LA6 and Abysnote 3.6 (lulzactive, max. 1,6GHz)!
So, have fun comparing...
3898 stock rom
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk
4100 with checkrom v5 + cf kernel
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA App
Darky 3.3
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
A woping 4018 on stock la4
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA App
Hey this is my score abyssnote 3.7 with darkyrom LA6 stock 1.4GHZ
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
I m not one to put any trust in benchmarks but im bired so here goes
Cassie xtralite v8 with franco kernel
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
What on earth i can barely get above 3000. Fresh reboot on darky 3.3 franco kernel gives 2800!
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA App
brickedphone said:
Haha. My Galaxy Mini got 6782. Superior to Note.
Sent from my superior Samsung Galaxy Mini using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
please go away troll
Ignore or report him.
Got 3953 on stock Galaxy Note
I think i had over 4000 on the old Quadrant, but could be just variance between runs i guess.
I wonder what the Transformer Prime will get if it now supports quad core benchmarking and ICS It already had a pretty impressive score in ISC compared with 3.0 (waiting for mine to arrive hopefully tomorrow).
um
pre-update first time benchmarking on Darky 3.3 with franco kernel
5k+
post-update first time benchmarking on darky 3.3 with franco kernel
4691
3917 stock KJ4
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk
4578 with rocket rom and Franco kernel
Quadrant kept crashing my phone so I ran antutu and got 7101. Don't know if that's good or not for that program as I've never ran it. I'm on rocket 22 with abyss 3.8
From the Beast : Galaxy Note
Running stock deodexed and Francos v2 kernal
Highest after running three straight but an average of 4700
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
Where are the 6-7 k benchmarks this was rumored to be getting 4000 is weak i get that on my single core infuse ...
Sent from my INFUSE powered by ZEUS
5008
Darkrom 3.3 Franco kernel #2
Got it working. 4838
From the Beast : Galaxy Note
Ueihtam said:
5008
Darkrom 3.3 Franco kernel #2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not bad
Sent from my A500 ICS dream machine
I just loaded CM9 on my Vibrant coming from another 4.0 ICS rom and I must say, I don't ever remember the phone being this tolerable to use. And I had it overclocked to 1400MHz. Anyone else re-enjoying their old flame with CM9?
Yes. I really like cm9 with subzero. Very solid Rom.
heygrl said:
I just loaded CM9 on my Vibrant coming from another 4.0 ICS rom and I must say, I don't ever remember the phone being this tolerable to use. And I had it overclocked to 1400MHz. Anyone else re-enjoying their old flame with CM9?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What did you use to over clock it to 1.4? Or is it already in the CM9?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using xda premium
Sup guys, going to be making a comparison between different kernels running on different roms. I know that some of you are going to go on about how benchmarks don't mean anything, if that's you then simply disregard this post.
All roms will be tested with nothing except Gapps (not signed in), Titanium Backup and AnTuTu installed, TB and everything else will be closed before the benchmark.
3 benchmarks will be done, and I will post the average total score.
PAC-ROM
First of is PAC-rom (v20.0.0), by the developer aways who has been making a huge impact on the i9000 rom scene with numerous different roms.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2170768
Stock Kernel (I believe this is stock CM10.1 kernel, with lower total ram than all the other kernels, BM is NOT enabled):
Average is 3837
Test 1
Test 2
Test 3
Fishears LVM 1/03/2013:
Average is 3902
Click here
Stay tuned... more kernels and roms coming soon.
which is best rom
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
Well that depends, what would be the use that you're planning for your smartphone?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
my tip
casileon said:
Well that depends, what would be the use that you're planning for your smartphone?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I use this http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2075637 with 410MB RAM.
I am very satisfied. Follow the instructions and you will not regret it.
AW: My 4.2.2 Kernel/Rom Benchmark thread
I get higher score with nolvm fishears around 4400
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
CM 10.1 with Semaphore kernel, Bigmem not enabled, OC 110% and I got 5140.
My average score is 2200 on Antutu benchmark.
Galaxy S I9000
Slim_Bean 2.5
Semaphore_JB_2.9.15s
CPU: 1000 Mhz
k4mi1o0 said:
CM 10.1 with Semaphore kernel, Bigmem not enabled, OC 110% and I got 5140.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How did you get that? Mine only 4k++ with almost same setting with yours.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk 2
tiger bean good rom :good:
HellyBean 0323 based on CM10.1
Devil Kernel 4.2 0204
Live OC 120%
CPU 1440 MHz
chatlaxs said:
tiger bean good rom :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes im using it two days and very impressed its the fastest and lightest Rom ive used on a S1
Supernexus GT-I9000
WebMonster21 said:
Yes im using it two days and very impressed its the fastest and lightest Rom ive used on a S1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
can I do it?
hello im looking to flash a kernel over my current roms kernel but i came from developing on a motorola atrix which had faux123s kernels as the best but i couldnt get the to boot on my s3 and i have no experience with the n4 (got it yesterday)
Personally I'm using franco. It has the best balance for me.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda premium
I sometimes wonder if people keep starting these threads simply to troll.
No such thing as best kernel or best ROM. Pick one whose features fit your needs and test it.
vanmarek said:
I sometimes wonder if people keep starting these threads simply to troll.
No such thing as best kernel or best ROM. Pick one whose features fit your needs and test it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i dont have time to extensively test, most kernels i use i notice no diffrence, me personally i keep my processor at 1.026 max with sio and usually interactive as my governor, also some kernels have gpu overclocking and some dont i cant really tell even after sifting through everything, like a good rom i am testing every aosp based rom and i cant find one to really stick out. i am asking opinions i suppose.
exb0 said:
Personally I'm using franco. It has the best balance for me.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
can i use the faux control center to mess around with the gpu? if not i may just stick to his but i like franco since it has nightlys
I guess a better question would be should i stick with stable aosp roms and kernels or go with nightlys? if anyone has a suggestion or personal prefrence i would love to hear them, i have pretty muched used xylon and franco nightlys,slimbeans,paranoid android april 26th build and liquid smooth. havent felt the need to try vanillarootbox because from what i remember its cm based anyway
All of the kernels here are great. Try them all and see. Personally I think you should start with Trinity kernel. It has awesome performance.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
Franco
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda premium
no one ever gives matr1x credit, but that is definitely my #1.
many people say that franco,trinity or matrix are the best but sometimes the stock kernel as the CM kernel is the best at least for battery.
now if you are gamer etc maybe franco kernel is your best choice!
alvin182 said:
many people say that franco,trinity or matrix are the best but sometimes the stock kernel as the CM kernel is the best at least for battery.
now if you are gamer etc maybe franco kernel is your best choice!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nah. For gaming trinity is the best! For battery and smoothness Franco wins IMO.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
alvin182 said:
many people say that franco,trinity or matrix are the best but sometimes the stock kernel as the CM kernel is the best at least for battery.
now if you are gamer etc maybe franco kernel is your best choice!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree. I'm using Franco right now. Its able to push through a day of tweeting and whatsapping but stock kernel and cm kernel was amazing. 1% drain after 8 hours of WiFi on standby.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda premium