Kernel war? - XPERIA X8 General

Well i saw a lot of people ask "With kernel is better?" questions a lot! So i decided to make this thread showing that they aren't different at all.​
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
NobodyAtAll's version 11.________________________________________.Alfsamsungs version 8​As you can see both of the kernels get the same score at the end. But with the NobodyAtAll's kernel you get noticeably better Database IO and better Sd card reads.
And with the Alfsamsungs you get better 2D graphics and 3D just by a little bit. Also on the Recovery side you get a Touch UI in the Alfs version 8 kernel.​
So let's wrap this up, if your a Gamer and want the best performance on your phone i highly recommend the Alfs v8.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And if you are a multi tasker and use the phone for like browsing and more serious situations and like the Naa's fast boot time so go with the NobodyAtAlls v11
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

You could name thread: Which kernel? READ THIS
Like deedii did for new members, leaving members...

nAa kernel start to cast ultimate on alfs
zoom..
....vooo
.....poooo
alfs kernel has gone offline
Sent from my X8 running nAa and D_d piece of art called MiniCM9.

you're lil test are not saying much since you're missing all specs
which rom ?
which clock speed? (cant see on the screen shots)
which cpu governor?
and how many test did you do? benchmarks result change quite often

Prime HD Alfs v8a/Naa 11 600Mhz (omdemand) Tested many many times and the 1728 was the max i was able to get on both kernels.

the test is not precise because you haven't turned off the sdcard r/w test and the result is varied in the tests
edit : it actually turned out that alfs v8 wins by 9 points

woo a whole 9points
Sent from my E15i using XDA

In my eyes alfs is the best .Period
Sent from my heart using Xperia X8

I like Alfs because of the fps cap versions, those screen cuts are soo annoying.
Sent from my XPERIA X8 using xda premium

If only people could stop seeing development as a war zone...
People are sharing their work, it is not a competition.
Some like one kernel better, some like another.
There is a place here for every legit development work, so stop trying to light fires.
Thread closed.
iR¡[email protected]!* via Tapatalk 2

Related

Random Epic4G Quadrant Results

I am using Syndicate Frozen Rom 1.1.1 and got some stunning benchmark results.
Stock ROM i was getting around 900-1000, now that I've switched to the SFR1.1.1 (EXT4) my maximum is now 2654 which is just under what my roommate gets on his dual core android tablet.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Its called EXT4
LunaticWolf said:
Its called EXT4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That and acs knows how to make a mean rom lol.... best scores I ever got were on acs roms
Sent from my Evo Killer using XDA Premium App
Yea ... but doesn't 1.1.1 have something that boosts the quad scores a little anyways ...?
libsqlite.so, ext4, maybe no journaling.. hes overclocked.. this is nothing special..
chris41g said:
libsqlite.so, ext4, maybe no journaling.. hes overclocked.. this is nothing special..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea ... you can go over 9000
so this is nothing .....
It may not be anything special, but i was sincerely impressed to see the score.. maybe it just means something to me.. i'm not too experienced with custom roms and such.. sorry if this is old news.
kd0feo said:
It may not be anything special, but i was sincerely impressed to see the score.. maybe it just means something to me.. i'm not too experienced with custom roms and such.. sorry if this is old news.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No it's cool i like looking at them also ...
aghh i remember the Hero days it was like the little train that could.
You know whats stupid i got 2439 i was running 1400/1400 on performance on cfq
did a 2nd test same settings got 2711
3rd test on noop with performance 1400/1400 and got 2435
QUADRANT IS RANDOM NOT ACCURATE
Okay good to know, any other suggestions on what benchmark may be more accurate?

Quadrant Benchmark for Galaxy Note - 4308 (and probably higher)

Perhaps the Quadrant Utility tool for Benchmarking needs an upgrade - the screen size is too large yet the speed test (FPS) is hidden under the screen's bottom partly.
The note must be pretty quick!
Anyways - I scored a benchmark of 4013! This was achieved after ensuring that task manager had all apps exited and memory cleared.
Update: On my third benchmark in a row I got 4308. You may check my blogs later today as I upload all the performance images.
the note is pretty good. samsung did a good job of optimising the drivers, and the GPU is surprisingly more powerful than my atrix despite the higher resolution.
Quadrant doesn't need an upgrade - it needs throwing in the bin!
It's a deeply flawed benchmark that tells you pretty much nothing about the overall performance of your device.
Regards,
Dave
I got a score of 4600 using an Interactive governor on a kernel I rolled. This makes it awesomely faster than my paltry Nexus One . Shame Quadrant is pretty meaningless as a cross-device benchmark though....
foxmeister said:
Quadrant doesn't need an upgrade - it needs throwing in the bin!
It's a deeply flawed benchmark that tells you pretty much nothing about the overall performance of your device.
Regards,
Dave
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you have a better app to suggest?
rdosti said:
Do you have a better app to suggest?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AnTuTu maybe?
Got an awesome 4395! I'm amazed by the phone's performance on Benchmarks, yet I find it just as fast as my HTC sensation on the usual day to day usage. hope updates will improve speed!
Vellamo by Qualcomm
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
kunalparwani said:
AnTuTu maybe?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which app do you use to overclock??
i dont remember exactly how much i got with quadrant, but with antutu i reached ~7050 score with criskelo ics rom v2, ondemand 500-1.4ghz ;D
Darky, franco kernel
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
MfG a_halodri
RocketRom v23
Sent from my GT-N7000
How do you get such awesome numbers?
I got 2810 on my stock deodexed LA6 ,and 3691 on cm9 v3
I do nothing. Only flashed Darky Rom and Franco kernel v10.
MfG a_halodri
MR.change said:
How do you get such awesome numbers?
I got 2810 on my stock deodexed LA6 ,and 3691 on cm9 v3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nothing much really RocketRom with Franco #8 kernel. That's it
Sent from my GT-N7000
It is the kernel from Franco, he is great:thumbup:
MfG a_halodri

Rom with best 2D/3D graphic performance

Hi, what rom has the best graphic performance?
Sent from my E15i using XDA
sani1503 said:
Hi, what rom has the best graphic performance?
Sent from my E15i using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Look at this ONE !
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HzLujpxWj0o&feature=g-upl&context=G29743a5AUAAAAAAADAA
i made a video.....included antutu score 2d 3d without sd card
sorry for bad video.....
PRIME HD 6.0
i think gingerdx has highest 2d/3d performance
Firedroid and froyopro 2.5
Sent from my E15i using xda premium
You have to mention Kernel as well.
For Stock Kernel: FroyoPro by lrakkarl : 2d : 600+
My kernel is naa11
Sent from my E15i using XDA
FroyoPro 2.5
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my XPERIA X8 using xda premium
Who cares about benchmarks, the user experience is the most important part. Sometimes benchmark apps give very high scores, but the ROM feels choppy and slow. That's why those benchmark apps are mostly useless, it's a bit the same story as with the 'how much free RAM can you get' stories. You guys are wasting memory by installing such as app, while we don't have to much..
In fact, MiniCM9-3.0.0 has got the best 2D and 3D performance since it uses the libs that are provided by Qualcomm, it's incredibly awesome. If you don't believe this, go ahead and test the ROM. And don't run a benchmark app, but just use your eyes and see the difference.
btw, the kernel used is nAa-ics-1 off course..
MiniCM7 and MiniCM9 for me have the best 2D,3D performance,everything is smooth and clear and games runs property ,, of course in combination with nAa kernel..
-James- said:
MiniCM7 and MiniCM9 for me have the best 2D,3D performance,everything is smooth and clear and games runs property ,, of course in combination with nAa kernel..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed
i'm using miniCm7 too
and everythings work so great
I think personally with out over clocking stock rom (2.1) with stock kernal is the best
I'm new to XDA!
Please press the "thanks" button if i helped!

[ROM][AOSP][4.0.4] F1 GalaxyNexus [Populair Kernel Test..]

F1 GalaxyNexus Kernel Test​
I know there is already a kernel test with HyDrOG3N-ICS AOKP rom..
But in my opinion that was not a realistic test, by the following reasons:
UV/OC/GPU settings (tweaked, not stock)
DeepSleep 80/90% (not normal use)
It is important that the same settings are used everywhere, so the comparison is fair.
Stock values
Same governer/schedule
To keep this thread clean and organized please pm me the following information:
Used Kernel + (version)
Screenshots (Usage/Screen on time)
Usage overall (wifi on time, BT, Youtube, Whatsapp, Facebook, Viber, Call time etc.)
I will post the results in a organized survey to keep this clean..
Can u people help with Governer/Schedule will be the best choice for the most fair test results..?
If I forgot something tell me..!!
SiyahKernel Test Results
N.E.A.K. ICS Test Results
SpeedMod SGS2 ICS Test Results
Thoravukk Kernel Test Results
Ikki The Phoenix Kernel Test Results
VokuKernel Test Results
---Reserved--
-Reserved------
-Maybe i need this one to-
i am looking forward your test result
Emre9110 said:
i am looking forward your test result
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
I'm quite sure Bejee (the guy who did the other tests) used the same governor + I/O scheduler. Lulzactive + vr
The thing is, he left his screen brightness set to minimum. And how can he have 5+ screen time with 90%+?
So, no need to compare. Each of you has his own perspective and way of testing.
Nonetheless, yours sounds promising. Looking forward to it.
Batskoning said:
SpeedMod SGS2 ICS Test Results
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't you already know Speedmod isn't compatible with AOSP ROM ?
Epic Fail Sir.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Emre9110 said:
i am looking forward your test result
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1

Evaluating ANTUTU 5, impressions so far.

I was selected to test out an Alpha version of ANTUTU 5, here are my impressions so far. It is markedly longer than previously. There are new CPU tests, including Single Thread Integer, Single Thread Floating Point, refined 2D tests, which are now performed in landscape, and an all new 3D test Project Anarchy, which is a Forrest Scene. Pretty Cool. Cant wait for the final project.
stevessvt said:
I was selected to test out an Alpha version of ANTUTU 5, here are my impressions so far. It is markedly longer than previously. There are new CPU tests, including Single Thread Integer, Single Thread Floating Point, refined 2D tests, which are now performed in landscape, and an all new 3D test Project Anarchy, which is a Forrest Scene. Pretty Cool. Cant wait for the final project.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am testing it too and I've noticed something but I am not sure if it's related to Antutu. When it goes to CPU Interger Test or Float point test, all cores go to 100% usage except for CORE1. For some reason, it stays at 1-10%. Maybe it's the kernel. I am using ElementalX
andreasyeah said:
I am testing it too and I've noticed something but I am not sure if it's related to Antutu. When it goes to CPU Interger Test or Float point test, all cores go to 100% usage except for CORE1. For some reason, it stays at 1-10%. Maybe it's the kernel. I am using ElementalX
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I will check it out if I can, I am stock unrooted. How can I check for you?
stevessvt said:
I will check it out if I can, I am stock unrooted. How can I check for you?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think you can't. I am using InsertCoin Rom to check CPU Usage. Thanks anyway!
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2809307
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
i just downloaded and gave a shot but it is restarted my device around 34%
M8 viperone 1.8.0 @ 2.5ghz via elementalx 0.19
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
SD redbull v2
Nice,...stock? My best so far was 43341, stock unrooted. My first run resulted in a F/C, but everything since has been good.
stevessvt said:
Nice,...stock? My best so far was 43341, stock unrooted. My first run resulted in a F/C, but everything since has been good.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have no idea how you guys are getting a such a high score, im stock rooted but only can get around 41500 and that's only after updated the gpu drivers

Categories

Resources