Related
mirror solution
better webtop soluction
RADIO FM solution
better root solution
CM7 build
Sense Build
MIUI Build
Touch witz Build
HTC Sensation Keyboard Port for Atrix
native mvk and others good codecs support to webtop/mediacenter/phone
Modifications on MediaCenter?!(it is possible?!)
OC kernel
if anyone remember more post here
Requesting a dev to work on something without a payout is like going to a mechanic and saying, "yeah I want my car to have 800HP, but I am not paying you for it. just do it. "
If you are wanting this done fast, get about 2 grand into a paypal and be ready to drop it for someone to work. These people do this stuff for free! Stop demanding!
When something is available then it will be posted. If you arent willing to work on it yourself, stop posting. The devs know what the community wants, they are not retarded. I really wish these posts would stop popping up.
Kthnx.
stop do this =/.....I only want do a topic with all we want ...and reegroup here when its done too simplify
EclipseX said:
better root solution
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1138204
90% of those requests are terrible. Why would devs waste time putting other manafacturers skins on our phone? If you want sense so bad, why the hell didn't you buy an HTC phone?
detroitjb said:
90% of those requests are terrible. Why would devs waste time putting other manafacturers skins on our phone? If you want sense so bad, why the hell didn't you buy an HTC phone?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats the idea behind eval-'s thread. If people want to pledge money to it and a developer wants to pick it up it happens.
i requested help for a kernel without thermal throttling in Q&A because we are many with phone working at 50%...
if they help us i can buy them a coffee, no problem
There is already a touchwiz launcher floating around here somewhere so yea.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
malfuncion said:
Requesting a dev to work on something without a payout is like going to a mechanic and saying, "yeah I want my car to have 800HP, but I am not paying you for it. just do it."
Kthnx.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not that I entirely disagree people shouldn't ask to much of devs, but that statement doesn't work
a mechanic would do work on your car, and it would only be your car. A dev makes something once and everyone can use it. Surely you see a difference?
If you went to a mechanic and asked him to figure out how to make all of a certain model of car have 800HP, and he had the same model car, its a but of a different situation.
That said, whatever devs dev I'm happy with, just felt the need to point out the mechanic analogy doesn't suit this.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA Premium App
Glad to see people still posting useless threads in the dev section
Can we get this moved to general?
You want it ? Learn to do it yourself... lots of info thats all easy to access with google. Mr. Clown please Close this useless thread
Another good thing is native mvk and others good codecs support.
Ririal said:
Glad to see people still posting useless threads in the dev section
Can we get this moved to general?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You my friend should be a mod lol they are all pointless threads
EclipseX said:
mirror solution
better webtop soluction
RADIO FM solution
better root solution
CM7 build
Sense Build
MIUI Build
Touch witz Build
HTC Sensation Keyboard Port for Atrix
OC kernel
if anyone remember more post here
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just by writing ' request devs' in the title of the thread doesn't make it a dev. thread. Patience is the key. Post things like this in general section.
Sent from rooted Atrix on 2.3.4 with unlocked bootloader using xda premium app.
firefox3 said:
You my friend should be a mod lol they are all pointless threads
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not ALL pointless...
Atrix ~_~
I was so happy that I finally got my 3.1 update last week for my iconia but 3.2 is ready to come out in a few days... Hopefully we will get this update sooner this time.
http://www.androidcentral.com/andro...mpaign=Feed:+androidcentral+(Android+Central)
Sent from my A500 using XDA Premium App
From what I read online 3.2 is suppose to be a version optimized for 7 inch tablets and the Icecream Sandwich 4.0 will be release in the 4th quarter of the the year for all tablets.
Nevermind... it will be ported for sure. Heheh
Based on Acers history, do you think there is much of a chance we will even officially see a android 4 (ICS) release for the A500?
pacificwing said:
Based on Acers history, do you think there is much of a chance we will even officially see a android 4 (ICS) release for the A500?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Almost sure we will, but WHEN is the right answer!
OrionBG said:
Almost sure we will, but WHEN is the right answer!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bet you fifty bucks we get it from the devs here LONG before we get it from Acer.
Google have said that ICS will be open-source, so that's the point where you'll start seeing some real innovation in tablet ROMs. At the moment the custom ROMs are nice, but it's largely tinkering around the edges + new kernels. ICS will change that.
So I wouldn't worry too much about Acer bringing it to the A500 - someone will, and it'll be better than Acer would have done it.
Moved as not development, please read the rules and post in the correct section ONLY.
Besides, just wondering why are you posting XOOM news in Acer A500 forum ?
madnish30 said:
Moved as not development, please read the rules and post in the correct section ONLY.
Besides, just wondering why are you posting XOOM news in Acer A500 forum ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I thought this was the general section where you can post anything "general" that would have to do with the A500. I just think the OP was giving us a heads up on 3.2 is all.
madnish30 said:
Moved as not development, please read the rules and post in the correct section ONLY.
Besides, just wondering why are you posting XOOM news in Acer A500 forum ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually it is about development, whats the difference between this and other post in development just mentioning about 3.1. And I did not post it about the Xoom, I was just showing everyone that 3.2 can be expected in a few months, or years lol, for the iconia.
Sent from my A500 using XDA Premium App
some of these senior members spent 99% of the time telling people not to post, meh
thanks for your post, now there is hope for all the bugs in 3.1 to go away. The wifi issue is not a small one.
FloatingFatMan said:
Bet you fifty bucks we get it from the devs here LONG before we get it from Acer.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yip!
mnaderi said:
thanks for your post, now there is hope for all the bugs in 3.1 to go away. The wifi issue is not a small one.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
...and be replaced by 3.2 bugs
mnaderi said:
some of these senior members spent 99% of the time telling people not to post, meh
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You get those types on any forums, not just this one. Support forums tend to be worse because there is a lot of the same questions being asked over and over and it tends to build up animosity and resentment among the people who've been around for a while. There is really nothing you can do except add a disclaimer with every post, explaining how you've exhausted every other option prior to posting. There will always be the crowd that feels posting on a support forum should be a last resort, to be used only after every other resource has been drawn upon. I've seen that iron-fisted approach turn some boards into vacant wastelands. In comparison, it's really not that bad here...for now.
Back on topic: I think the original poster was posting a seemingly Xoom topic on an A500 board because there a lot of A500 owners still wondering if they made the right purchase and look to compare the two. I speak as an A500 owner when I say that if a new patch comes out, and the Xoom gets it first, I damn well want to know about it.
Cheers,
-PW
edit will be posted later tonight!!!
-Re-post of Original Text-
So I was looking around briefly and noticed Bionic has Maverick as most of you are aware and found the osh.img dump on their thread and thought (well Joe's webtop_mod uses a osh.img file to install...) so decided to try swapping the osh.img files and >,> what do you know it actually doesn't cause the Atrix to flip into a boot loop XD And shows their version of Webtop in the settings menu under Webtop version XO
Basicly looking to port the Bionic's Maverick Webtop to our phones, I understand Sogarth is working on porting the webtop2sd to the Bionic. I wanna start the effort to port the Maverick Webtop to our Atrix's, I mean as is the mount points/addresses shouldn't be too different. I doubt Moto went ahead and reinvented the wheel when it came to a Android/Webtop (Ubuntu) setup so it should come down to finding addresses and changing them accordingly.
Haven't tried anything else other than the install, in class then at work at a new location, so I doubt they'll let me turn off the U-verse demo to try out the Webtop >,>
Command line seems functional full webtop no so much
Djazin said:
edit will be posted later tonight!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What a tease!!
barry99705 said:
What a tease!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lmao I know! I know! but just had a major breakthrough was able to use the command line and more Now wanna turn this into a actual Webtop Rom after testing!! I Will have it up by tonight but I just got otta class and am on my way at a new location for work, I doubt they'll let me turn off the U-verse Demo to mess with this but I'll be able to compile the mods/patches and other fun stuff from work I promise!
What exactly is this? Isnt the webtop from the Bionic and the Atrix the same? Can this help bring landscape hdmi mirroring to Atrix since the bionic has it?
primeboss said:
What exactly is this? Isnt the webtop from the Bionic and the Atrix the same? Can this help bring landscape hdmi mirroring to Atrix since the bionic has it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Think about it more... And no, and don't care for HDMI mirroring. So that said find another thread for it.
Update have the command line down and functional, working on modding the .apk files to launch the right mount points but the first part of seeing if its even usable is confirmed, gonna work on the .apk files while at work to see what I can get done with it might need some help being I hate java and apk modding personally its complicated to me but I'll try my hand at it, basically use the bionic .apk files and set them up to run on the Atrix so that way you wouldn't have to find all the addresses the apk/script calls on within Webtop.
Djazin said:
Think about it more... And no, and don't care for HDMI mirroring. So that said find another thread for it.
Update have the command line down and functional, working on modding the .apk files to launch the right mount points but the first part of seeing if its even usable is confirmed, gonna work on the .apk files while at work to see what I can get done with it might need some help being I hate java and apk modding personally its complicated to me but I'll try my hand at it, basically use the bionic .apk files and set them up to run on the Atrix so that way you wouldn't have to find all the addresses the apk/script calls on within Webtop.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am thinking, instead of giving me a over smart answer, you could be polite and just tell me. I thought the webtop from the bionic and atrix, even photon is the same?
primeboss said:
I am thinking, instead of giving me a over smart answer, you could be polite and just tell me. I thought the webtop from the bionic and atrix, even photon is the same?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay here's a "overly smart answer" Webtop has nothing to do with HDMI mirroring they are two completely different functions that happen to use the HDMI cable. Your post is equal to assuming the entertainment center is the same as Webtop >,>
Sorry but I too think that answer was rude...
Still you haven't accomplished anything substantial or at least offered any proof of your accomplishment and you are already all over your head... *sigh*
Chill dude...
Updated OP with pics of my current setup and I ask if your not constructive, just know I rather tell you to go fly a kite than to sit here waiting only 12 hrs to see results.
This is in the general section because there is very little done on this at the moment from my end I'm not sure what others are working on but I have yet to see a Maverick port from the Bionic underway, its no where near perfect and its to prove that flashing the Webtop from another working Moto/Webtop isn't a bad way to start than to sit around and asking for a upgraded native Ubuntu or using one of the image mods on a current native one.
The Docks do not work Lapdock/ or HD dock for this method though command line bashing into Webtop dose work and seems rather stable, no weirdness on my test Atrix though I have yet to move this to my main Atrix until I get a gui set up for it that will off set the lack of Webtop. Current stand point checking the class.dex files of the dock/portal .apk files for some sort of header id keys to change it from Bionic > Atrix. Not uploading the zip file I used to flash mine being that I believe a flash able zip should contain the correct dock/portal apk files for any release for now if you wanna try this create a backup of your current osh.img via
dd if=/dev/block/mmcblk0p13 of=/sdcard/Originalosh.img
Djazin said:
Updated OP with pics of my current setup and I ask if your not constructive, just know I rather tell you to go fly a kite than to sit here waiting only 12 hrs to see results.
This is in the general section because there is very little done on this at the moment from my end I'm not sure what others are working on but I have yet to see a Maverick port from the Bionic underway, its no where near perfect and its to prove that flashing the Webtop from another working Moto/Webtop isn't a bad way to start than to sit around and asking for a upgraded native Ubuntu or using one of the image mods on a current native one.
The Docks do not work Lapdock/ or HD dock for this method though command line bashing into Webtop dose work and seems rather stable, no weirdness on my test Atrix though I have yet to move this to my main Atrix until I get a gui set up for it that will off set the lack of Webtop. Current stand point checking the class.dex files of the dock/portal .apk files for some sort of header id keys to change it from Bionic > Atrix. Not uploading the zip file I used to flash mine being that I believe a flash able zip should contain the correct dock/portal apk files for any release for now if you wanna try this create a backup of your current osh.img via
dd if=/dev/block/mmcblk0p13 of=/sdcard/Originalosh.img
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I applaud your effort and I know that there's really not much done lately on this regard, so I wish you luck on porting the Webtop to the Atrix.
However my comment was more in regards of your rudeness. But let's focus on your progress then. (Looking good btw)
Cheers!
Sent from my Atrix using Tapatalk
primeboss said:
What exactly is this? Isnt the webtop from the Bionic and the Atrix the same? Can this help bring landscape hdmi mirroring to Atrix since the bionic has it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Would it hurt to answer the guy's question? Not everyone knows what the hell a maverick webtop is (including myself). If there was any other websites out there that had as good info as xda I would definitely go there instead because lets be honest, the overwhelming majority of members here are certified douche bags.
legion21 said:
Would it hurt to answer the guy's question? Not everyone knows what the hell a maverick webtop is (including myself). If there was any other websites out there that had as good info as xda I would definitely go there instead because lets be honest, the overwhelming majority of members here are certified douche bags.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is Maverick.
The Atrix webtop is based on a much older Ubuntu release.
stewartsoda said:
This is Maverick.
The Atrix webtop is based on a much older Ubuntu release.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You mean to tell me the answer was readily available with a Google search?
legion21 said:
Would it hurt to answer the guy's question? Not everyone knows what the hell a maverick webtop is (including myself). If there was any other websites out there that had as good info as xda I would definitely go there instead because lets be honest, the overwhelming majority of members here are certified douche bags.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I stumbled accross this thread by accident. But i have to add my 2 cent to that comment. Right understand this. XDA is a development community, the devs are not here to educate noobs, maybe some come accross abit rude sometimes. But maybe it's because they have the same idiots asking the same stupid questions every single day. People that cannot even be arsed searching google before they ask these stupid questions. And you wonder why developers get annoyed when all there trying to do is develop something for the whole community, but there threads get bogged down with idiots?? How are they ment to share ideas with other devs when before they know it there thread had 100 pages of noob questions?
Sent from my R800i using Tapatalk
wish you luck OP
AndroHero said:
I stumbled accross this thread by accident. But i have to add my 2 cent to that comment. Right understand this. XDA is a development community, the devs are not here to educate noobs, maybe some come accross abit rude sometimes. But maybe it's because they have the same idiots asking the same stupid questions every single day. People that cannot even be arsed searching google before they ask these stupid questions. And you wonder why developers get annoyed when all there trying to do is develop something for the whole community, but there threads get bogged down with idiots?? How are they ment to share ideas with other devs when before they know it there thread had 100 pages of noob questions?
Sent from my R800i using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True, but...
I doubt that will apply in this case.
Why?
1. The OP is not a known developer
2. This post is not on the Development section
3. He went through leaps and bounds to explain the differences between webtop and hdmi mirroring instead of just answering the n00b question
In the end, being just a bit polite doesn't hurt anyone.
I suggest the OP to post his progress in the Dev section, where its "ok" to be rude.
My 2 cents
Sent from my Atrix using Tapatalk
Rayan said:
True, but...
I doubt that will apply in this case.
Why?
1. The OP is not a known developer
2. This post is not on the Development section
3. He went through leaps and bounds to explain the differences between webtop and hdmi mirroring instead of just answering the n00b question
In the end, being just a bit polite doesn't hurt anyone.
I suggest the OP to post his progress in the Dev section, where its "ok" to be rude.
My 2 cents
Sent from my Atrix using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It doesn't matter if he is a "known developer" or not, can you do the types of stuff he's talking about?
If you don't have any clue what the op is posting about you shouldn't be posting in the thread to begin with. If you don't know that there is a search button or how to use it you shouldn't be posting on xda at all. This does not apply to just this thread but all of xda.
Forgive my rudeness but some people just don't belong on xda and need to go to the motorolla forums where they belong. As Andro said before xda (not just the development section) is for development and those with that mind set.
You want people to be nice, don't post here with questions that could be answered via an xda or google search simple as that.
Just my 2 cents...
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
crossix said:
It doesn't matter if he is a "known developer" or not, can you do the types of stuff he's talking about?
If you don't have any clue what the op is posting about you shouldn't be posting in the thread to begin with. If you don't know that there is a search button or how to use it you shouldn't be posting on xda at all. This does not apply to just this thread but all of xda.
Forgive my rudeness but some people just don't belong on xda and need to go to the motorolla forums where they belong. As Andro said before xda (not just the development section) is for development and those with that mind set.
You want people to be nice, don't post here with questions that could be answered via an xda or google search simple as that.
Just my 2 cents...
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sorry but I'm no n00b (i've been cooking my own roms since the Pocket Pc days and now Android) so you'd better stop your sermon. Specially when it comes from some person with just 28 posts that don't offer much to the community.
I was not the one who asked the OP by the way. But I'm sure you know that too since you are so wise.
I was just saying that politeness doesn't hurt anyone.
Cheers!
Rayan
Sent from my Atrix using Tapatalk
Rayan said:
I'm sorry but I'm no n00b (i've been cooking my own roms since the Pocket Pc days and now Android) so you'd better stop your sermon. Specially when it comes from some person with just 28 posts that don't offer much to the community.
Sent from my Atrix using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Now who's the rude one, sheesh? I never called you a noob, I asked you a question and you responded which to that I say thanks. My post was in general to xda, not directed toward you and I'm sorry if it seemed that way. I'm sure everyone on the xda forums appreciates all the roms that you've released and the help that you have provided keeping threads on topic from your 900+ posts.
I'm tired of going to a thread seeing that there is are new posts only to discover that its just another person requesting information that they could have easily found if they had used the search (or hell even searched google) and then the several posts afterwords bashing that person to oblivion or telling them the answer which throws the thread off topic and continues for several more pages worth of posts.
I'm pretty interested in this topic and I don't want this thread cluttered with questions that could be answered through simple searching as most of the other threads I monitor have been. Now could we please keep this on topic?
@crossix
Okay, apologies accepted... and I'm sorry for being rude too.. Let's keep this thread on topic then...
Cheers!
Rayan
Created in response to this
Info has been updated, I thought this thread was long dead
visit here often to find aggrevated details about the two ROM's.
love or hate, thor2002ro's Open Sourced build​
Wi-Fi has been fixed.
Bootable CWM .zip has been posted.
Greenscreen flicker issue (related to drivers, fix coming)
Still not stable, obviously.
Source seems to be incomplete like his other works.
Many of the physical interfaces work, from HDMI to radio to vibration - follow header link above to see complete list
GPS, Camera feed, and Audio does not work.
blazingwolf's Soon-to-be Open SourceBuild​
Flashable Zip ready
No Wi-Fi
No Source (yet)
Hardware acceleration - green-screen bug caused by hardware accel.
Many hardware parts are not working.
Discuss.
Thor just released an alpha build as a CWM zip!!
Lol
Sent from my EPAD using xda premium
Using Thors now. Why is hardware accelaration not working? Its working in Blazingwolfs. Are these guys not working together/.
Just plugged in Thor's ROM and here are some things I noticed immediately:
No market
When I tried to sideload the market, it said I didn't have an SD card installed, which I do
Color variations, primarily green
Widgets show cell widgets (obviously not needed) as well as the cell '4 bars' in the notification area
Browser speed seemed very fast
Obviously a lot still to do, but a nice start by Thor. I have alpha 7 ICS on my phone and I'd love to stock ICS on the a500. Not really into all the 'bells and whistles' that some devs like to do.
TFordham said:
Just plugged in Thor's ROM and here are some things I noticed immediately:
No market
When I tried to sideload the market, it said I didn't have an SD card installed, which I do
Color variations, primarily green
Widgets show cell widgets (obviously not needed) as well as the cell '4 bars' in the notification area
Browser speed seemed very fast
Obviously a lot still to do, but a nice start by Thor. I have alpha 7 ICS on my phone and I'd love to stock ICS on the a500. Not really into all the 'bells and whistles' that some devs like to do.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll take any working ics build I can get
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Wouldn't anyone else agree that working on 2 separate ICS builds is a bit counter-intuitive? It shouldn't be a competition to see who has the bigger you-know-what... Why not work together on a single ICS ROM. Put everyone's brain power together to release a single stable build. We've got hardware acceleration working on one, wifi on the other. Vice versa is still broken... It makes sense - just mash them together with what works! I understand it's "a little more difficult than that" but I'm sure there's a way to work together rather than go head-to-head.
Just my 2 cents. I'd contribute to the effort if I could, but this is the best I can say... Good luck devs!
Bloodflame said:
Wouldn't anyone else agree that working on 2 separate ICS builds is a bit counter-intuitive? It shouldn't be a competition to see who has the bigger you-know-what... Why not work together on a single ICS ROM. Put everyone's brain power together to release a single stable build. We've got hardware acceleration working on one, wifi on the other. Vice versa is still broken... It makes sense - just mash them together with what works! I understand it's "a little more difficult than that" but I'm sure there's a way to work together rather than go head-to-head.
Just my 2 cents. I'd contribute to the effort if I could, but this is the best I can say... Good luck devs!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agree 100%. I'm not a dev, but this can be a joint effort, everyone working together to a common goal.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
From what I hear....Thor doesn't play well with others....don't remember where I read it though.
Sent from my 1.4 ghz ACS Ice Creamy Epic 4g
Lol did u guys ever check the development section?
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
gmfeny said:
Lol did u guys ever check the development section?
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why do you think this thread exists? If you'd read the threads in there, you'd know THIS one was made to keep inane chatter out of the dev threads.
FloatingFatMan said:
Why do you think this thread exists? If you'd read the threads in there, you'd know THIS one was made to keep inane chatter out of the dev threads.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wooaahh. Slow down cowboy lol. That was in response to people saying Thor doesn't play well with other devs when he has a thread open so people could help get ics for the Iconia.
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
gmfeny said:
Wooaahh. Slow down cowboy lol. That was in response to people saying Thor doesn't play well with other devs when he has a thread open so people could help get ics for the Iconia.
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yep.....the thread that he just had closed.....
I totally appreciate the work of all the Devs here....but dude just comes across as a douche....like those guys who make all A's in college and look down on ppl just because he makes good grades and then turns around and refuses to help his classmates........
I'm not complaining...
I just personally don't understand the motives.... I thought that this was supposed to be a "community"?
well I tried the open way just now... all the source was open but some douche reported my thread... since I had enough of a headache from working on ICS and from the first time I tried to convince the "mods" of anything... I have no "duty" call towards xda
so now I'm now back to "private dev mode"
And the douche who sent the report can be happy now... thinking he "won" something
thor2002ro said:
well I tried the open way just now... all the source was open but some douche reported my thread... since I had enough of a headache from working on ICS and from the first time I tried to convince the "mods" of anything... I have no "duty" call towards xda
so now I'm now back to "private dev mode"
And the douche who sent the report can be happy now... thinking he "won" something
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you for that. I understand that. But we all have a personal "duty" to each other here. I'm finally taking classes so that I can be helpful here. I dont feel like its my duty. But to be a productive member. I have to.
Thank you for answering and not being a douche like some people have been....
If I were Thor I would have had the thread closed down aswell. People just don't listen. 1st post in the thread stated if you don't have anything to contribute, do not post, commenting is not contributing.. I read alot of nonsense. I don't need to test an alpha.. Wtf.. Thor will get it figured out.. lovin the v14.2, so I can wait..
thor2002ro said:
so now I'm now back to "private dev mode"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Any chance we could get milestone updates as you make progress? (even if its on your own site with comments disabled. By the way your site has got to be the most innovative I have seen the way it scales to the device) By the way what did you get reported for? The fact you didnt want random comments in the thread? I cant see anything wrong with your request to keeping the thread to development only.
sure all is here
http://forum.tegraowners.com/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=106
just made one...
thor2002ro said:
sure all is here
http://forum.tegraowners.com/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=106
just made one...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Many Thanks !!
thor2002ro said:
well I tried the open way just now... all the source was open but some douche reported my thread... since I had enough of a headache from working on ICS and from the first time I tried to convince the "mods" of anything... I have no "duty" call towards xda
so now I'm now back to "private dev mode"
And the douche who sent the report can be happy now... thinking he "won" something
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What was it reported for? I was thrilled you'd gone back to the gpl-compliant route, I was looking forward to being able to use your work. Don't let an individual dissuade you from the open thing.
Posting this hoping some of the CM developers on the touch pad visit this section of the forums -
I was wondering if anyone knows which kernel modules are in use on CM7 that are allowing the touchpad to have full 3D and working audio under the OS. Working on getting Debian running fully on the touchpad hardware and these are two hurdles I need to get over next.
~Jeff
JeffHoogland said:
Posting this hoping some of the CM developers on the touch pad visit this section of the forums -
I was wondering if anyone knows which kernel modules are in use on CM7 that are allowing the touchpad to have full 3D and working audio under the OS. Working on getting Debian running fully on the touchpad hardware and these are two hurdles I need to get over next.
~Jeff
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not the place for this. Use Q and A
Sent from my Touchpad using xda premium
mr_clean5953 said:
Not the place for this. Use Q and A
Sent from my Touchpad using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this is development related...
scrizz said:
this is development related...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i would have let that sit just to let whoever replied enjoy i and think about it.
and yes this is dev related.. but anyway Merry xmas to all
scrizz said:
this is development related...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes it is. So that makes this the right place to post this question right?
At any rate anyone know the answer to my question? I was hoping someone would know off hand so I don't need to wipe my Debian install to load up CM7 myself.
~Jeff
not the proper place to post this question. try other development thread.
JeffHoogland said:
At any rate anyone know the answer to my question? I was hoping someone would know off hand so I don't need to wipe my Debian install to load up CM7 myself.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why would you need to wipe your Debian install to install CM7?
havikx said:
not the proper place to post this question. try other development thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Link? There are multiple Android threads for TP floating around these boards...
jcsullins said:
Why would you need to wipe your Debian install to install CM7?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lack of space. These things lack external storage remember
~Jeff
jcsullins said:
Why would you need to wipe your Debian install to install CM7?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
JeffHoogland said:
Lack of space. These things lack external storage remember
~Jeff
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, I am very familiar with the storage characteristics of these devices.
Just curious what you've filled your device with, now.
Come on guys, quit being douchebags.
The guy's asking a simple question. (And he's asking it to help provide yet another option for our Touchpads. )
method2madness said:
Come on guys, quit being douchebags.
The guy's asking a simple question. (And he's asking it to help provide yet another option for our Touchpads. )
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Seriously, this is ridiculous. Probably a large part of the reason RootzWiki exists, because of this BS on XDA. OP, please don't be discouraged - I support your efforts and wish I could answer your question!
If you mean the kernel compiling, maybe you can check the tenderloin kernel build in github
I wish I can also find the CM7 source code for TP but it seems been pulled off from github, you can check the work of preludedrew but the rom I built from his code does not work well for 3D acceleration and other stuffs (or maybe I have done something wrong in compiling...)
Hope this helps