The official MIUI team have opened the PatchROM project source in purpose of making MIUI ROM ported to more models.
We can download all the Patchrom code and matching tutorials at here:https://github.com/MiCode/PatchRom
They also provide the Patchrom Project Pack to download at here: http://bigota.d.miui.com/micode/patchrom.zip(Be careful: The pack maybe on the sever located in China. The pack size is nearly 380MB. The very slow downloading speed will make you angry. And I don't know which the language is used in it. )
There is a official MIUI ROM porting tutorials pdf. But it is in Chinese.
7 steps in it.
1. Build the development environment
2. The necessary knowledge of the Andriod phone
3. Choose a perfect official ROM
4. Decompile
5. Porting MIUI Framework
6. Porting MIUI APP
7. Make a ROM pack in zip file which could install in the recovery
Maybe the pdf is very useful to port MIUI to our phone. But I am not a English leaner. So I have no ability to traslate it into English. Excuse me please. If somebody are good at the translation between Chinese and English, please help us. Thank you.
What is the difference between the patchrom.zip from bicota, and the one that can be download from github link?
I'm saying this because the download speed from github is a lot faster.
dancer_69 said:
What is the difference between the patchrom.zip from bicota, and the one that can be download from github link?
I'm saying this because the download speed from github is a lot faster.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe it is same thing that I have just seen in the offical forum.
What is the point in this? We already have multiple Miui versions. Also, this isn't really a development thread so you should post this in general.
Cinthiar said:
What is the point in this? We already have multiple Miui versions. Also, this isn't really a development thread so you should post this in general.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can be the start point for having an official MIUI ROM for U8800, instead of having a port from desire.
But yea, should be in general section
Sorry, I just thought it may be useful. Maybe the moderator would move it away. Sorry.
fancyzs said:
Sorry, I just thought it may be useful. Maybe the moderator would move it away. Sorry.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It might well be useful, its just not in the correct section.
Thread Moved To General
This is not a development thread, it is information. As such belongs in the general section
Did you use the micode patchrom project on the github? https://github.com/MiCode
Very good news. Thanks for sharing.
Everything that is miui is good! :beer:
Related
How to build our own custom rom based on ICS?
What are the tools that i need and please give the link to source code of ICS
Questions go in the Q&A section, not the Dev section
UMMM wheres the Instructions? I dont see this as much helpful as you only have links to various things that dont CLEARLY direct topics.. sorry
stljim2005 said:
UMMM wheres the Instructions? I dont see this as much helpful as you only have links to various things that dont CLEARLY direct topics.. sorry
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
See here
EXTREMELY IMPORTANT!!! Its working again and was fixed as I sespected because they checked the build.prop so I added the new link here for you all to download the new signed version.
So i decided to download the s voice apk dump that was on the main thread and try it on our phone and guess what... IT WORKS
So head over to this thread and scroll down to the bottom of the post download the rar extract it and install the apk like normal then have fun.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1662255
P.S it would be a nice feature for roms to have so it could be a good idea to incorporate it in your next release cough cough dzo
I tried on 2 phones - both says error parsing the package. So the link you gave doesn't work on our phones or HTC.
EDIT: of course if it's on ICS than i know why it's not working, because i use Gingerbread. Well then i live withiuth it. i gues it needs wi-fi/3G to work and that's is bad option for me.
what has this got to do with "development"?
iamelton said:
what has this got to do with "development"?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
not to much but its only in the development section so that developer will find it easier eg dzo and incorporate it into there rom
i bet the forum moderators have alternate views on this..
the development section is a serious place for development-related discussions instead of personal taste-related stuff..
iamelton said:
i bet the forum moderators have alternate views on this..
the development section is a serious place for development-related discussions instead of personal taste-related stuff..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well we will let them to decide when they get round to it but as far as im concerned this is where i reckon it should be
So now, the criteria to post on the development section is whether the poster wants the ROM devs to read or not? LoL
Thank you for posting this!
BUT, I'm on ICS (DZO) 2.04, and the app started OK but now it's just tell's me "unfortunally the application has stopped"
Which ICS are you on?
Moved To General
How is this development? Please post in the correct section!
This version does not needs changes in build.prop:
[App/MOD/Fix] S Voice app- "Network Error" Fix w/o Changing your build Prop
Not tested yet.
---edit---
It's working
I have been waiting for an app like this for a LONG time.
works like a charm... waiting that perhaps appears a version with portuguese language buit in
Haha cheers I just saw this on the main portal and hve edited this post with the new link
Dear kernel and ROM developers.
According to GPL v2 license, under which kernels are released, kernels must be released with source code provided.
To be fully compliant, the thread must contain.
@ kernel devs
Successfully build and produce a valid output file, which is the same format as provided in the binary
Contain all source code, interface definition files, scripts used to control compilation and installation of the executable (it is not required to include the actual compiler/toolchain, but sufficient information should be made available to obtain the SAME configuration, including compiler flags, as used to build the binary version as released
Example.
Kick-ass kernel
Built with android-toolchain 4.8 4.8-2013.05 (linking isn't a bad idea)
Branch used to compile (can be a direct link to git)
Name of the defconfig used in build
A short instruction about how to build it (not necessary, but useful)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@ ROM devs
if ROM uses custom boot.img, the source must be provided. If it uses kernel by someone else, the kernel thread must be linked in the OP
if the ROM contains stock kernel, source must be linked (official site can be used)
Using a non GPL compliant kernel makes your ROM non compliant and subject to removal
Violation of GPL is in fact a breaking of the law, so I don't have to explain what could be a final of this.
More information can be found in the news written by pulser_g2.
Thank you for your attention.
Tom
XDA Senior Moderator
I'm leaving this thread open. To all developers, you have 7 days to comply with GPL rules. After this time ALL non GPL threads will be closed and links removed.
If you have some concerns or questions, feel free to chime in into this thread.
eagleeyetom said:
I'm leaving this thread open. To all developers, you have 7 days to comply with GPL rules. After this time ALL non GPL threads will be closed and links removed.
If you have some concerns or questions, feel free to chime in into this thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
U allready remove link from some threads, that doesn't look like 7 days to me !
Cryss said:
U allready remove link from some threads, that doesn't look like 7 days to me !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This user was warned about it before and didn't comply. Hence the removal. All the rest have 7 days to provide kernel sources in their threads.
eagleeyetom said:
This user was warned about it before and didn't comply. Hence the removal. All the rest have 7 days to provide kernel sources in their threads.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I understand, but i have a question ...
In old rooms or threads, this must be done too ?
Cryss said:
I understand, but i have a question ...
In old rooms or threads, this must be done too ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes. All ROMs with kernels must have its source provided. No matter how old they are.
eagleeyetom said:
Yes. All ROMs with kernels must have its source provided. No matter how old they are.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
but what if the roms are to old and dont have device anymore and you dont know wich kernel u used
just a question as i have this on some of my old roms
but most are using the same LibiSC Kernel
SpaceCaker said:
but what if the roms are to old and dont have device anymore and you dont know wich kernel u used
just a question as i have this on some of my old roms
but most are using the same LibiSC Kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you are not sure, remove a kernel from your zip
SpaceCaker said:
but what if the roms are to old and dont have device anymore and you dont know wich kernel u used
just a question as i have this on some of my old roms
but most are using the same LibiSC Kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can check the screenshots in the particular ROM thread and then find out from the screenshot about which kernel you used in the ROM and can provide a link to the kernels being used in your ROM.
Make it an announcement would be nice.
Much devs simply wont have read this thread like me too so my thread got locked.
Atm waiting for reopening.
Mardon said:
Make it an announcement would be nice.
Much devs simply wont have read this thread like me too so my thread got locked.
Atm waiting for reopening.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sorry but I have to disagree. One week is long enough to do such simple thing as adding a link. Every member need to read the rules while joining the XDA and the rule says:
9. Don't get us in trouble.
Don't post copyrighted materials or do other things that will obviously lead to legal trouble. If you wouldn't do it on your own homepage, you probably don't want to do it here either. This does not mean we agree with everything the software piracy lobby try to impose on us, it simply means you cannot break any laws here, since we'll end up dealing with legal hassle caused by you. Please use common sense: respect the forum, its users, and those that write great code.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
GPL is a part of the legal system, so should be followed on every forum.
Guys check this out ! Not my work; just sharing...
Seems like bugs are temporarily scotch taped
I still couldn't download. The responses seems positive from other flashers. If anyone can download can you please upload it somewhere for others?
Oh...and don't forget to post your opinions ....
thread posted in the wrongsection, its not your rom ,so you cant post it in under the android development thread.
its someone else work so this tread will be closed, as you cant post any link of a rom without proper kernel sources
is it working
anybody tried is random reboot gone?
Lol its not a fix... No reboots cos phone doesnt enter deep sleep... Like a wake lock app
ZenR2 said:
thread posted in the wrongsection, its not your rom ,so you cant post it in under the android development thread.
its someone else work so this tread will be closed, as you cant post any link of a rom without proper kernel sources
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Isn't it Android development thread?
iTalisman said:
Isn't it Android development thread?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Buddy no offence its just that in android development, one post ones own built up roms, you don't post links of others rom.
iTalisman said:
Isn't it Android development thread?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Refer to this post here by XDA Moderator @zelendel Since there is no Kernel Source which are required by XDA Rules and GPL Law No Rom Should be Shared here and Since The Link of your Rom Directs to Others Work without their permission and absence of kernel sources you cannot link it here That is the reason Development Forum is Closed
Thread closed. Do not post links to roms that are 1. Not your work. 2. Break our rules. 3. Links like this have no place in Development.
Hi everyone,
I'm sharing the download link for unofficial LineageOS which I found while browsing AFH.
This is developed by @facoco. Big thanks to him.
I'm only sharing the download link and by no means do I take credit for anything and also if the developer of the ROM wants to delete this thread, he is free to. I don't want to offend any developer. It's because of their hard work that we can install all these great ROMs.
Here's the link to download the ROM:
Moderator Edit: Link removed
Use open Gapps.
I haven't tested it so can't say anything about bugs.
This post is just to share the ROM and if any developer wants to delete this thread, they can do so.
And once again, big thanks to @facoco for this build.
This really belongs in the Developer section, and you should only post it with permission, there might be a reason that dev didn't post it here... The General section is not for ROMs.
I think that @Alberto97 is the official maintainer and will probably rename or start a new thread as needed, although I have been out of the custom ROM game on the G3 for a while now. There is also an unofficial LOS thread in Original Developers as well.
acejavelin said:
This really belongs in the Developer section, and you should only post it with permission, there might be a reason that dev didn't post it here... The General section is not for ROMs.
I think that @Alberto97 is the official maintainer and will probably rename or start a new thread as needed, although I have been out of the custom ROM game on the G3 for a while now. There is also an unofficial LOS thread in Original Developers as well.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah you're right. This thread should probably be deleted/closed.
Do you know how I can do that??
adityak1303 said:
Yeah you're right. This thread should probably be deleted/closed.
Do you know how I can do that??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Report thread/first post to moderator...
Thread closed - OP edited