Not looking good for ICS...
http://briefmobile.com/motorola-atrix-4g-update-4-5-141-coming-february-7th-its-not-android-4-0
We have CM9 on its way, and lot of mods with ICS stuffs on it, why still wait for ICS from Motorola...
Enjoy the Custom mods....
For now at least, those of us using the webtop are stuck with blur based roms, which makes the idea of an official ICS very appealing.
For now only razr is beeing worked, after all omap 44xx devices get ICS, since are easier to port, "We will provide ICS to other devices."
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Who cares about ICS Motorola update. We need a kernel update. Any news about that??
Sent from my MB860 using XDA Premium App
Acerbix made a OC kernel for CM9. You can find in his CM9 Kang thread
Sent from the (M)Atrix
Related
http://www.androidpolice.com/2012/03/28/google-pushes-source-code-of-android-4-0-4-into-aosp/
Hmmmm.... A noob question real quick:
Does this mean that we'll see stable custom clean ICS ROMs (meaning without TW and without the SPen) shortly or do we still need to wait for Samsung's official ICS release for drivers and stuff?
AOSP issues should be easier to resolve if nit completely fixed
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA
Don't think it will be quicker
The kernel is not open source and the kernel is what controls the drivers so we will still be waiting for the galaxy note kernel source
However hopefully the note ics will be based on this build
Maybe this is what samsung was waiting for
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk
nandihno said:
Don't think it will be quicker
The kernel is not open source and the kernel is what controls the drivers so we will still be waiting for the galaxy note kernel source
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The kernel IS open source, and the GPL compels them to release the source code. However this doesn't need to be until the upgrade is officially released, expected sometime in Q2
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using XDA Premium HD app
Thread Closed
Please use the ICS news sticky!
the china miui have been confirmed that miui for our galaxy s3 will be released on friday for close beta team and then after one week bug tracking period,it will be public beta released d..hehe
ps:however,its based on official samsung rom,im still hoping someone could port it on CM9 based
Why port to CM9 base? I actually tried to do this, I couldn't get past the boot screen. I followed a guide on how to port miuiv4.
I believe the problem lies with you needing an existing miuiv4 to port, and the only similar device is the S2, but that rom is 4.0.3, and CM9 is 4.0.4. At least that's why I think it wasn't working. Gave up pretty fast.
lukyjay said:
Why port to CM9 base? I actually tried to do this, I couldn't get past the boot screen. I followed a guide on how to port miuiv4.
I believe the problem lies with you needing an existing miuiv4 to port, and the only similar device is the S2, but that rom is 4.0.3, and CM9 is 4.0.4. At least that's why I think it wasn't working. Gave up pretty fast.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
because i have tried the stock rom based miui and cm9 based miui on my last phone sensation xe,the stock based rom is just so much slower and bugs than cm9 based.
actually i also tried as urs and no luck,same situation v urs.
ansonchan said:
because i have tried the stock rom based miui and cm9 based miui on my last phone sensation xe,the stock based rom is just so much slower and bugs than cm9 based.
actually i also tried as urs and no luck,same situation v urs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Miui based on stock for s2 is also really slow..
+ 1 for cm9 port
Skickat från min GT-I9300 via Tapatalk 2
I hope it's going to be a multilanguage release. English would be gread, German would be awesome :laugh:.
Miui 4 for i9300 is in beta. Released next week if all goes well.
Its realesed look at general section.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
I might try the port soon. CM9 base for S3..
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
adyscorpius said:
I might try the port soon. CM9 base for S3..
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please do. The beta release does not feel snappy like cm7 based miui, also miui v4 themes don't theme all intended areas ie dialler and sms due to samsung base.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
RGUI MIUI BETA V1 this is smooth and fast for a beta not many bugs aswel:good:
Hi All,
Ok, first of all i know P3100 already got CM9 support and i know the rom is cool , already got taste of CyanogenMod on my LG P990 & HTC Desire...
But since P3100 already got android 4.0.4 updates, would be great if we have some custom roms based on existing 4.0.4 stock firmwares...
Sorry to ask, is that mean that the current CM9 based on 4.0.3 not 4.0.4? is there any compability issues like camera or something or is it work 100% fine?
CM9 is indeed android 4.0.4 ...
so far everything is working fine in CM9, even faster & smoother than stock rom, just some random bugs some user experienced like buggy video play, you'll find more info in their discussion thread http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1727420 ...
it is just p3100 already got updated stock android 4.0.4 as well, so i think i want to stay in samsung stock firmware, yeah i know its slower than CM9 but stock firmware is much more stable(at least for me)... for that i would greatly appreciate if some generous devs upload a deodexed or even tweaked+deodexed stock samsung firmware based...
I just ordered the GT-3100 model, I should be seeing it, this week... with that being said.. are there any OC stock roms available?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda app-developers app
CXENTE said:
I just ordered the GT-3100 model, I should be seeing it, this week... with that being said.. are there any OC stock roms available?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so far no stock firmware based custom rom or even stock based custom kernel available for GT-P3100
i might be wrong but the only custom rom support for GT-P3100 is CM9 and custom kernel is for CM9 as well http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1735258
baliriot said:
so far no stock firmware based custom rom or even stock based custom kernel available for GT-P3100
i might be wrong but the only custom rom support for GT-P3100 is CM9 and custom kernel is for CM9 as well http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1735258
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I see,,,do all the phone/mms function work, on the CM9 rom?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda app-developers app
codeworkx have done a great job to get GT-P31XX & P51XX CM9 support, thanks to him ... everything is working almost seamlessly and it's like you're owning a Nexus device with CM9 supports, it's just matter of time this device will get official buildbot CM9 Nightly status
baliriot said:
codeworkx have done a great job to get GT-P31XX & P51XX CM9 support, thanks to him ... everything is working almost seamlessly and it's like you're owning a Nexus device with CM9 supports, it's just matter of time this device will get official buildbot CM9 Nightly status
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hell yeeaaa!!! Can't wait too get this tab n root it :thumbup::beer:
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda app-developers app
CXENTE said:
Hell yeeaaa!!! Can't wait too get this tab n root it :thumbup::beer:
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good for you :good: ! Probably by the time your P3100 arrived, it already got updated to android 4.0.4 , there are existing threads to odin flash custom recoveries and rooting in android development section ... have fun!
Lukenda has claimed at least twice that this particular version of Gingerbread (2.3.5) runs better on stock kernel... His opinion.
So, come on Lukenda, tell us more.
Anyone who has toyed with this version is more than welcomed to chime in.
One particular thing worth noticing is that no stable release of CyanogenMod is based around 2.3.5.
MiniCM7 2.0.7 is based on 2.3.5 and it's stable
yes i did and i based it on a long time of using them.
there is a stable 2.3.5 rease by nAa
,there are few minor bugs but i dont mind them.
try to use minicm7 2.0.7 and some 2.3.7
rom such as gdx.
make a comparison between those two and test battery speed in apps such as YouTube and internet browsers.
All games I have been able on 7 rom were playable on .5 rom.
Please test for your self and report.
Sent from my X8 using xda app-developers app
Let me repeat myself. there's no stable release of CyanogenMod based around 2.3.5: http://wiki.cyanogenmod.com/wiki/CyanogenMod_7_Changelog
Stable release, as in final release, as opposed to a nightly release or a release candidate.
Lukenda said:
yes i did and i based it on a long time of using them.
there is a stable 2.3.5 rease by nAa
,there are few minor bugs but i dont mind them.
try to use minicm7 2.0.7 and some 2.3.7
rom such as gdx.
make a comparison between those two and test battery speed in apps such as YouTube and internet browsers.
All games I have been able on 7 rom were playable on .5 rom.
Please test for your self and report.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
*Sigh*
I was really hoping for something better than that. Your claim that the 2.3.5 is indeed better is totally unfounded.
The only thing you are left with after that kind of testing is that for your use MiniCM is better than other ROMs and the hypothesis that it might be because of the android version.
You could have at the very least get your hands on GingerDX v015 to test your claim.
And if anyone is interested in actual testing, a proper way would be to compare GingerDX v015 to GingerDX v016.
To take it a step further comparing XGin 5.4 to XGin 6.0 and kuyaDROID v3.2.175 to v.4.3.233 (which I think was the next available release) would be needed.
I still have the original nAa's GB (2.3.5 for stock kernel) rom, so if anybody is interested in testing that rom, i'll ask nAa if i could reupload it on MF if nobody finds a working link .
Fortun said:
Let me repeat myself. there's no stable release of CyanogenMod based around 2.3.5: http://wiki.cyanogenmod.com/wiki/CyanogenMod_7_Changelog
Stable release, as in final release, as opposed to a nightly release or a release candidate.
*Sigh*
I was really hoping for something better than that. Your claim that the 2.3.5 is indeed better is totally unfounded.
The only thing you are left with after that kind of testing is that for your use MiniCM is better than other ROMs and the hypothesis that it might be because of the android version.
You could have at the very least get your hands on GingerDX v015 to test your claim.
And if anyone is interested in actual testing, a proper way would be to compare GingerDX v015 to GingerDX v016.
To take it a step further comparing XGin 5.4 to XGin 6.0 and kuyaDROID v3.2.175 to v.4.3.233 (which I think was the next available release) would be needed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
why dont yo do it?
i was just saying how clean version is it,and if u have something to say first try out yourself. :screwy:
Sent from my X8 using xda app-developers app
That was his opinion , all you do now is to judge him...
Sent from my E15i using xda app-developers app
Mockingbird said:
That was his opinion , all you do now is to judge him...
Sent from my E15i using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
who is judging,i just layout my personal opinion and he startrd a whole new thread about it .
Sent from my X8 using xda app-developers app
woah guys. let's keep this a clean discussion. i'm actually interested as i haven't tried 2.3.5 myself.
Sent from my rooted tomato using xda app
KuyaDroid is stable rom,and it's 2.3.5 android version!
Link: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1109563
mimicm is stable too
Sent from my X8 using xda app-developers app
how about the performance against froyo and 2.3.7? haven't tried kuyadroid.
Sent from my rooted tomato using xda app
cascabel said:
how about the performance against froyo and 2.3.7? haven't tried kuyadroid.
Sent from my rooted tomato using xda app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
2.3.7 roms has best performance then all other versions
benchmarks are not reliable.:thumbdown:
Sent from my X8 using xda app-developers app
Well I have a r800x unlocked BL nd was wondering what exactly is the best rom/kernel combination for my play
I'm not big on the gaming functionality but do want camera and wifi Bluetooth stuff like that and I was also wanting a JB rom bad but ICS will do if the JB is too unstable
So yea XDA tell me what your choices are
Sent from my GBTweaked v7.1 r800x using Tapatalk 2
To be honest my first choice would be to tell you to check out miui-australia(its got its own kernel & its ics)... But only because its got loads of space...very stable, but aokp is good also (With wedgess lupus cm9 based kernel)...thats just me tho... As for jb I personally haven't tested any... But here good things about cj's slimbean port...
Sent from my R800x
Check out Slimbean with Turbo kernel.
If you want something a little more stable, try regular CM9 or MIUI Australia.
Sent from my Amazon Kindle Fire
I had to revert to FXP CM9 with the Adreno ICS driver, the driver didn't work with SlimBean for me. Still, stock GB 2.3.4 is fastest for gaming.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus
I would suggest the P.A.C.man ROM. It's got bugs, but I never thought my play would be this smooth. With 4.1.2, my phone is relevant again!
I never really liked miui as I flashed it to my brothers Droid x and it was to ummm.....IOS'ee for me love the look of aosp the best
Sent from my GBTweaked v7.1 r800x using Tapatalk 2
I will check out slim bean and P.A.C.man rom as I am craving jb lol
Sent from my GBTweaked v7.1 r800x using Tapatalk 2
crazymonkey05 said:
I will check out slim bean and P.A.C.man rom as I am craving jb lol
Sent from my GBTweaked v7.1 r800x using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was interested in both slimbean and pacman but I don't know where to find them for the R800x.
swing4thefence said:
I was interested in both slimbean and pacman but I don't know where to find them for the R800x.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There official forum's here are the links slimbean: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1975851
P.A.C.Man: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1952220
sent from my Sony Ericsson Xperia Play™ Running Slimbean 3.0 using Tapatalk 2™
I'm using FXP 151 with latest lupus v9 kernel. This latest kernel update was awesome.
Pretty smooth and no problems at all untill now.
I would like to try a Jelly Bean based rom, tough. Haven't decided witch one...
Sent from my R800i using xda app-developers app
This thread was obviously missed when it was started but best ROM threads shouldn't be posted as there is no such thing as "best ROM", it's all down to what suits you best so try them yourself and find what's best for you.
Thanks
AvRS