http://phandroid.com/2011/11/14/and...ode-available-now-cm9-work-begins-right-away/
It's official! Incredibly, before the Galaxy Nexus has been released, ICS source has been released, defying nearly every android enthusiast, blogger, and journalists' predictions that it will be released after the first ICS device is unleashed. I have posted a poll asking you who you think will build the first fully-functional (notice I did NOT say bug-free) ROM based on the source? Obviously, SDK ports are not included in this poll. Since we have virtually no expectation of a TouchWiz-based ICS update from Verizon (we don't even have official GB from them, and we may never have it), I have featured AOSP devs as the main choices in this poll. Please click one of the "other" options in case I forgot to mention an AOSP dev who you think will beat everyone else to it, or in case some TouchWiz ROM builder feels froggy and wants to jump into AOSP. I look forward to seeing your opinions - vote away!
NOTE: I think most of us realistically expect jt1134 to be the first, because he's always first, but even the undefeated 2007 Patriots were finally beaten in the Super Bowl
NOTE 2: I fumbled in writing the title for this thread - I should have titled it "Official ICS Source Released" since, as an official release, it wasn't "leaked" :facepalm:
NOTE 3: here's a video that explains what this means to those of you who are not developers
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQ_fiepb2Mc per request from qbking77
Has anyone seen John Connor?
My hats are off to jt1134 but I think Ludeboy will give him a run for his money
I was just about to post this.
Can't wait to get some ICS...even though I'm due for an upgrade.
I don't believe the Source was leaked...right?
http://api.viglink.com/api/click?format=go&drKey=1359&loc=http%3A%2F%2Fforum.xda-developers.com%2Fshowthread.php%3Fp%3D19351716%23post19351716&v=1&libid=1321314501860&out=https%3A%2F%2Fgroups.google.com%2Fgroup%2Fandroid-building%2Fbrowse_thread%2Fthread%2F4f85d9242667a85f%3Fpli%3D1&ref=http%3A%2F%2Fforum.xda-developers.com%2Fforumdisplay.php%3Ff%3D718&title=%5BROM%5D%5BWIP%5D%5BSDK%5D%20Ice%20Cream%20Sandwich%20(Alpha%205)%20-%20Page%2056%20-%20xda-developers&txt=https%3A%2F%2Fgroups.google.com%2Fgroup%2Fandr...2667a85f%3Fpli%3D1&jsonp=vglnk_jsonp_13213145090901
AdelosMeansUnknown said:
I don't believe the Source was leaked...right?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@droidstyle: what were you linking to? Link doesn't work
Has anyone seen John Connor?
skynet11 said:
@droidstyle: what were you linking to? Link doesn't work
Has anyone seen John Connor?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It lead me to the Google blog (not sure what but it looks official) just stating that the source was officially released. The links works for me for some reason.
Er pretty sure its officially released and not a leak. Though that certainly had no bearing on the excitement this news brings
https://groups.google.com/group/android-building/browse_thread/thread/4f85d9242667a85f?pli=1
Sent from my SCH-I500 using xda premium
skynet11 said:
@droidstyle: what were you linking to? Link doesn't work
Has anyone seen John Connor?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
link works for me. It's the blog from team google announcing the released ics source.
---------- Post added at 06:59 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:57 PM ----------
AdelosMeansUnknown said:
It lead me to the Google blog (not sure what but it looks official) just stating that the source was officially released. The links works for me for some reason.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes I was agreeing with you...just posted the link to back it up.
Ok, ok, guys, I mistyped the title - as stated in the OP, I typed "leaked" when I should have typed "released"
Moving on, now...
Has anyone seen John Connor?
It all really rely's on jt he has done so much. Without him we'd probably still be on touchwiz eclair/froyo and that's not my cup of tea, or cup of anything
Sent from my SCH-I500 using xda premium
Definitely JT. Enyo might make a port that works, but JT will be the first to make a fully-functional one.
I am not voting in the poll because I don't know the work of some of them. I predict that Enyo will put iOS and WebOS on hold for long enough to make a passable version with it, but one of the other older and more reliable devs will release a fully working rom later on.
Please add syndtr to the list as he released the "mostly" functional ICS SDK PORT
he deserves the cred
lambi1982 said:
Please add syndtr to the list as he released the mostly functional ICS SDK PORT
he deserves the cred
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is true, I believe I read that he is waiting for source and planned to continue development as soon as source was released.
jt already has something booting iirc from twitter
unless he posts to git, i really doubt anyone else on the fasc will get that far soon
and fwiw i have no business being included in the poll, i do nothing for aosp
nitsuj17 said:
jt already has something booting iirc from twitter
unless he posts to git, i really doubt anyone else on the fasc will get that far soon
and fwiw i have no business being included in the poll, i do nothing for aosp
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry about that - I was just allowing users the option of predicting a TouchWiz developer to cross over into AOSP, and you were just an example of a TouchWiz developer. I really didn't mean to offend
Has anyone seen John Connor?
Only 2 votes for sbrissen? I should point out that sbrissen said he would continue developing for the Fascinate even after he gets a Galaxy Nexus
Has anyone seen John Connor?
sageDieu said:
I am not voting in the poll because I don't know the work of some of them. I predict that Enyo will put iOS and WebOS on hold for long enough to make a passable version with it, but one of the other older and more reliable devs will release a fully working rom later on.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why do people think this is possible?
Why?
Why?!
Jr twittered that he got ics working...
Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk
Related
How come still no froyo? the devs are still working with eclair. why is that?
A week ago...think about that one
LOL when i read your headline i knew exactly what you were going to say.
2012iawait said:
How come still no froyo? the devs are still working with eclair. why is that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Devs here dedicate their own free time to crunch out the ROM's, if you are so impatient no one stops you to tackle 2.2 on your own.
Haven't you already bricked three phones?
Feel free to drop some mad froyo science on us. I'll flash it. Otherwise I'm perfectly content waiting for Euguene or Sombionix to give us something actually worth waiting for.
shoerhino said:
Haven't you already bricked three phones?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
qreffie said:
Feel free to drop some mad froyo science on us. I'll flash it. Otherwise I'm perfectly content waiting for Euguene or Sombionix to give us something actually worth waiting for.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wouldn't flash anything coming off the rocket scientist here
I visit the forums almost daily and there is always somebody spewing the same "if you don't like it then make your own" statement. You guys are as bad as the people asking about new roms and 2.2. The OP has a legitimate question and he wasn't rude about it either.
I'm curious too is this because the need more then the source or are they just trying to finish up the builds they were working on before the 2.2 source came out.
sp4rky said:
I visit the forums almost daily and there is always somebody spewing the same "if you don't like it then make your own" statement. You guys are as bad as the people asking about new roms and 2.2. The OP has a legitimate question and he wasn't rude about it either.
I'm curious too is this because the need more then the source or are they just trying to finish up the builds they were working on before the 2.2 source came out.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thank you!! these ****ing assholes think just because they know little about the phone they can say anything they want.
LOL you guys really expect developers to drop what they were already working on just because 2.2 source was released and on top of that it was released a week ago you really think there would be a 2.2 ROM out so quickly...be realistic.
BTW the person you should probably be asking is eugene373...feel free to PM him
demo23019 said:
LOL you guys really expect developers to drop what they were already working on just because 2.2 source was released and on top of that it was released a week ago you really think there would be a 2.2 ROM out so quickly...be realistic.
BTW the person you should probably be asking is eugene373...feel free to PM him
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We are just curious, we aren't demanding anything other than how things work in the dev community. At least that is what my post was about.
2012iawait said:
How come still no froyo? the devs are still working with eclair. why is that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think the devs still need the source code from vibrant froyo or vibrant froyo itself.... this is due to the differences in hardware between vibrant and international galaxy s
2012iawait said:
thank you!! these ****ing assholes think just because they know little about the phone they can say anything they want.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, it's because they're on a message board that they can say anything they want.
You ask a legit question, but if you've spent any time on these boards you should know that a "Where's Froyo?" thread is going to get hammered. And if you didn't know that, you should go to the Development forum and find out where Froyo is. From my understanding, Eugene373 is going to drop a build soon.
Go follow any one of excellent chefs/architects that work on the vibrant. They seem to work endlessly in putting out new content and in fact eugene had posted a few times on his twitter about 2.2 and its coming along.
Do a bit of outside research and you'll get your information. There is a Jp3 froyo in the development section as well.
Its a legitimate question but common sense and just basic browsing of the dev thread would have given you a clear answer.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
sp4rky said:
We are just curious, we aren't demanding anything other than how things work in the dev community. At least that is what my post was about.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know i said you guys... but that was more so towards OP, not you.
you could take what he said both ways and i mistook it as he was *****ing about no 2.2 roms yet
2012iawait said:
How come still no froyo? the devs are still working with eclair. why is that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey here's an idea
Read the forums you moron
In the official post for CyanogenMod 7 it says
"There are many devices still in beta status (Pyramid, Doubleshot, Shooter, HP Touchpad, Optimus 3D, several more) that we will be promoting to release or release-candidates in the next few weeks when the code is merged to our main branch."
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Now this is purely speculation as the title says so if anyone gets disappointed when it doesn't happen.
Now i could be looking at this completely wrong so feel free to call me a dumb ass if i am wrong.
Source: http://www.cyanogenmod.com/blog/cyanogenmod-7-1-released
The CM7 project for the Atrix is not being developed by official Cyanogenmod. Just stay tuned to the google code page and follow twitter accounts.
SirFork said:
The CM7 project for the Atrix is not being developed by official Cyanogenmod. Just stay tuned to the google code page and follow twitter accounts.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Once its in RC don't they give it to the official team for merging? that's what i thought happened from my understanding.
There are many devices still in beta status (Pyramid, Doubleshot, Shooter, HP Touchpad, Optimus 3D, several more) that we will be promoting to release or release-candidates in the next few weeks when the code is merged to our main branch.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's from the official Cyanogenmod site, which has no affiliation with the development of CM7 for the Atrix.
Yeah, but the current team is responsible for making the atrix compatible with cm7 (thus, they're doing most of the work). Once that's done, they'll be giving it to the official team so they can support it.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
I'm pretty sure the dev team has said all they need to do is get the fingerprint scanner and webtop working then they can submit it to cyanogen mod to try and get official status, since before cyanogen will accept any port it must not break any functionality that the stock rom had
thewarhawk said:
I'm pretty sure the dev team has said all they need to do is get the fingerprint scanner and webtop working then they can submit it to cyanogen mod to try and get official status, since before cyanogen will accept any port it must not break any functionality that the stock rom had
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The webtop might take a while since it seems they have to design their own version of it
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Exactly why this is such an ambitious effort. Some people might not have the fortitude (or the patience!) for this phone's technology to be fully realized. For me, I'm kind of excited to own such a unique device and hope the developers aren't discouraged by such a challenge.
SirFork said:
Exactly why this is such an ambitious effort. Some people might not have the fortitude (or the patience!) for this phone's technology to be fully realized. For me, I'm kind of excited to own such a unique device and hope the developers aren't discouraged by such a challenge.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think the devs are more discouraged by the trolls.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
IUH1991 said:
I think the devs are more discouraged by the trolls.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is probably a huge factor along with the massive number of idiots who fail to read directions properly and end up with bootloops and blame the dev's for making faulty software.
I installed CM7 on my Atrix and now it's running too fast. I can't keep up with it. Also the benchmark scores are too high, and the battery lasts too long. Plz fix.
Phalanx7621 said:
I installed CM7 on my Atrix and now it's running too fast. I can't keep up with it. Also the benchmark scores are too high, and the battery lasts too long. Plz fix.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
HaHa Good one!!!!
I think a lot of the trolls here are just ungrateful...they constantly complaining about things not work like they want them to work and they are constantly bugging the devs about when when when! These same trolls do not take a mere breath to stop and say thank you to the devs that work hard for free. No one has EVER promised them anything, but they complain like it is the devs duty to please them. Somedays I wish I were back in the Aria forum because the community was very helpful and the devs felt welcomed.
FYI good find OP!
lilhaiti said:
HaHa Good one!!!!
I think a lot of the trolls here are just ungrateful...they constantly complaining about things not work like they want them to work and they are constantly bugging the devs about when when when! These same trolls do not take a mere breath to stop and say thank you to the devs that work hard for free. No one has EVER promised them anything, but they complain like it is the devs duty to please them. Somedays I wish I were back in the Aria forum because the community was very helpful and the devs felt welcomed.
FYI good find OP!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
"Troll"
I don't think you know what that word actually means yet you use it constantly.
edgeicator said:
"Troll"
I don't think you know what that word actually means yet you use it constantly.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's actually kinda explained in my post.
lilhaiti said:
It's actually kinda explained in my post.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Since you still don't realise what the word "troll" actually means, let me clarify for you.
A troll is someone who posts inflammatory extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum, chat room, or blog, with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion.
ie the very people you are complaining about are not, in fact, trying to provoke people, but rather are just uninformed people asking for help. In fact, you are the one closer to a troll then they are since you keep insulting them instead of directing them to the right answer, potentially provoking them into an outlash of anger.
IUH1991 said:
The webtop might take a while since it seems they have to design their own version of it
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sadly I don't think they'll be having Webtop on Cyanogenmod. Last I heard it was too much work.
if cm7 allowed me to play my movies from my phone on tv when i am away from home i would be on it like a fat kid on a smartie!
edgeicator said:
Since you still don't realise what the word "troll" actually means, let me clarify for you.
A troll is someone who posts inflammatory extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum, chat room, or blog, with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion.
ie the very people you are complaining about are not, in fact, trying to provoke people, but rather are just uninformed people asking for help. In fact, you are the one closer to a troll then they are since you keep insulting them instead of directing them to the right answer, potentially provoking them into an outlash of anger.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nicely put...
Ratchet556 said:
Now this is purely speculation as the title says so if anyone gets disappointed when it doesn't happen.
Now i could be looking at this completely wrong so feel free to call me a dumb ass if i am wrong.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
dumbass....
sanriver12 said:
dumbass....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We dont sit here and update or post all day because its un needed, exhausting on its own, and frusterating to the point of cursing. I can once a week come to this thread and after going through 20+ pages find maybe one thing worth replying to, like this time and the gentleman that requested a few pages back that i call this kang and not official ?!? Why because we have waited till we deemed ready to merge ? Everything we released has been stable and useable i have not touched another rom in months, we will merge shortly, it will be up todate 2.3.7 or what ever uptodate is than. We are all running 2.3.7 curently , there has not been another release because IOO there has not been enough added fixes that we felt the need to do so yet. Mostly we have been waiting on FP. I have it working 100% fine actually better than stock, but it haz created a bug with calls when enabled for an unknown reason. I have been working on the same bug for over 2 weeks . Once again iwasted more time i could have spent on the bug to reply to those of you that felt i needed to "give updates" to a 170 page hell hole where no one reads in the first place Anyhow we appreciate your all excited , so are we , mostly so we can stop working keep in mind we want itcompleted and working obiously more than you do so either relax and wait or keep yelling inhere like a jakaninny IDGAF, but i will post updates when i am ready as will the other team members. End of story
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm going to ignore that for the soul fact I was right. From the CM7 thread.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Just read that the CM team is integrating this in to CM9, it looks amazing!!
How hard would it be for someone more knowledgeable than me to integrate it in to a ROM for our Tablets? It's open source so I don't know if it's as simple as just compiling and installing, or if you would have to compile a ROM from the google AOSP after adding it?
http://www.onskreen.com/cornerstone/
Thoughts?
bumpity bump
I wish I had of thought of that. Why not, Google should think about integrating this as well.
Awesome idea.. would put Ios off the grid of usable tablet
very interesting .
I so would love something like this on our tablet .Thanks for the Link .I am not a developer in any way. But I did send them a email asking for more information.Maybe we can get a Developer to spark some interest when we get ics.. As of for now stuck waiting for a major update.. nothing will be seriously developed for our tablet..
This could put android Way over the top...
Thanks for the link and very Useful thread..
has anyone seen this running on a true device not just emulation?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's working on the Samsung 10.1...
While this looks cool as hell, I m wondering if tegra 2 could pull this off
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using Tapatalk
BrianDigital said:
While this looks cool as hell, I m wondering if tegra 2 could pull this off
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Shouldn't be an issue with Ics which the maker of CS built it around and a galaxy tab i believe which is tegra 2
Sent from my INFUSE powered by ZEUS
On topic or GTFO.....
Aaron Camp said:
In your haste you accidentally removed this valid link to active development on cornerstone.
Hopefully others can avoid name calling etc so that this thread doesn't get moded again.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And in your haste, you linked to a forum we're not allowed to link to on the XDA forums, due to GPL violations. Well done.
I should not post this here..
But i had to. i went to cornerstone website and read there requirements to use there software.. THEY STRICTLY SAY ANYONE WHO IS GPL CAN USE IT.
I asked them to visit this xda banned site.
enough said..
Can someone give me a brief run down of this situation?
Just for the record, if this site requires registration for downloads then it should not be linked to. If not it's fine as long as no non gpl compliant works are linked to.
Also, roms are not subject to the gpl only kernels are.
Sent From My Fingers To Your Face.......
erica_renee said:
I should not post this here..
But i had to. i went to cornerstone website and read there requirements to use there software.. THEY STRICTLY SAY ANYONE WHO IS GPL CAN USE IT.
I asked them to visit this xda banned site.
enough said..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Get a life! Enough said!
Sent from my INFUSE powered by ZEUS
conantroutman said:
Can someone give me a brief run down of this situation?
Just for the record, if this site requires registration for downloads then it should not be linked to. If not it's fine as long as no non gpl compliant works are linked to.
Also, roms are not subject to the gpl only kernels are.
Sent From My Fingers To Your Face.......
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know why that was linked?
Sent from my INFUSE powered by ZEUS
what is the issue with the site?
And what is the issue with this thor guys ics build?
I'd research it myself but I'm at work right now and mobile only...
Sent From My Fingers To Your Face.......
Are you guys totally blind that you've managed to miss the DOZENS of times this has been explained in these forums!?!?
Basically, Thor refuses to release is kernel source code as required under the GPL license. Because of this, his ROMs, which have his kernel integrated, are not allowed on XDA, nor are links to his site.
He's done this because some people took his code, made cosmetic changes, then released it as their own without giving him credit. Instead of dealing with it maturely and getting those people dealt with by the mods, he decided to throw his toys out of his pram in a toddlers tantrum and withdrew his sources. Legally, he has no right to do this because, no matter what changes he has made, it is NOT his source code and never was.
Note, the above applies to his kernel only, but as he ships his kernel inside his ROMs, his ROM's are included in the ban along with his kernels.
It's a damn shame because he's a pretty good developer, but XDA have to protect themselves from possibly GPL violations, so out goes his code.
---------- Post added at 05:47 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:46 PM ----------
erica_renee said:
I should not post this here..
But i had to. i went to cornerstone website and read there requirements to use there software.. THEY STRICTLY SAY ANYONE WHO IS GPL CAN USE IT.
I asked them to visit this xda banned site.
enough said..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
*sigh* Erica... Really.. That doesn't help things at all...
FloatingFatMan said:
Are you guys totally blind that you've managed to miss the DOZENS of times this has been explained in these forums!?!?
Basically, Thor refuses to release is kernel source code as required under the GPL license. Because of this, his ROMs, which have his kernel integrated, are not allowed on XDA, nor are links to his site.
He's done this because some people took his code, made cosmetic changes, then released it as their own without giving him credit. Instead of dealing with it maturely and getting those people dealt with by the mods, he decided to throw his toys out of his pram in a toddlers tantrum and withdrew his sources. Legally, he has no right to do this because, no matter what changes he has made, it is NOT his source code and never was.
Note, the above applies to his kernel only, but as he ships his kernel inside his ROMs, his ROM's are included in the ban along with his kernels.
It's a damn shame because he's a pretty good developer, but XDA have to protect themselves from possibly GPL violations, so out goes his code.
---------- Post added at 05:47 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:46 PM ----------
*sigh* Erica... Really.. That doesn't help things at all...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm assuming this is directed at me.....
Blind? No.....
I, just don't monitor every forum every waking hour of the day. For that I can only apologise.
As for the kernel, yeah your right, it has no place here under those circumstances.
It does not stop anyone linking to that site though, providing the other criteria are met.
Sent From My Fingers To Your Face.......
conantroutman said:
I'm assuming this is directed at me.....
Blind? No.....
I, just don't monitor every forum every waking hour of the day. For that I can only apologise.
As for the kernel, yeah your right, it has no place here under those circumstances.
It does not stop anyone linking to that site though, providing the other criteria are met.
Sent From My Fingers To Your Face.......
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which they're not, as like most forums, you have to register to see download links.
conantroutman said:
I'm assuming this is directed at me.....
Blind? No.....
I, just don't monitor every forum every waking hour of the day. For that I can only apologise.
As for the kernel, yeah your right, it has no place here under those circumstances.
It does not stop anyone linking to that site though, providing the other criteria are met.
Sent From My Fingers To Your Face...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Assuming they linked to the Thor's dev thread there for ICS, it falls under the criteria of registering for downloads.
By the way, can we PLEASE make it clear to other users the importance of GPL compliance on XDA? I'm getting sick of others and myself getting called jealous haters for explaining basic forum rules. I'm just as bothered we're out a good dev as others but it isn't anyone's fault but Thor. And I'm not the only one who sees this. I've talked to other users and they're just as shocked by what goes on in here.
Edit: And Aaron if you have ever been into the development subforum maybe you'd have seen the sticky of the rule I have been citing about GPL compliance. You know, the ONLY rule I ever bring up on this subject. Is this the one I'm "making up"?
FloatingFatMan said:
Which they're not, as like most forums, you have to register to see download links.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cheers.
That's that then. No more links to that forum.
And no more childish name calling, no matter how thinly veiled it is....
Sent From My Fingers To Your Face.......
.. LOL! I just realised I asked a senior mod if he was blind! Bloody XDA mobile app!
Actually, I'm kinda glad to see you in here... We've been pretty modless for ages and tbh, it's gotten ridiculous. I know we have mods that drop in sometimes, but really, we need someone checking things daily. I'd offer myself but I'm not exactly innocent of losing patience with some people...
Petition: team up and ask samsung-mobile for sourcecode
Help us to get needed sourcecode from samsung-mobile to get all hardware bits working on aosp based roms like cyanogenmod.
http://www.change.org/petitions/sam...t-achieve-full-potential-of-purchased-devices
thanks
Bump. This is important!
Sent from inside a black hole.
NOMIOMI said:
Petition: team up and ask samsung-mobile for sourcecode
Help us to get needed sourcecode from samsung-mobile to get all hardware bits working on aosp based roms like cyanogenmod.
http://www.change.org/petitions/sam...t-achieve-full-potential-of-purchased-devices
thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We know about it mate...
Since Codeworks himself post it in CM9 thread N Original Development
eseregin said:
We know about it mate...
Since Codeworks himself post it in CM9 thread N Original Development
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes but since his thread is closed so it doesn't stay up...therefore users tend to neglect it. So making this thread is a great idea in order to get the most signatures. Am I right?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
signed. .
This is very important.
I signed it.
Signed
Sent from my GT-I9100T using Tapatalk
Signed...
But I dnt think it will happen
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA
Signed in hopes they release it.
Sent from my GT-I9100
NOMIOMI said:
Petition: team up and ask samsung-mobile for sourcecode
Help us to get needed sourcecode from samsung-mobile to get all hardware bits working on aosp based roms like cyanogenmod.
http://www.change.org/petitions/sam...t-achieve-full-potential-of-purchased-devices
thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This was already posted 2 days ago..
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1526939
Use search before duping topics.
Signed thank you.
Signed ............
signed hope they release it
It's not that simple. Samsung use binaries they are simply not allowed to release source for, due to IP rights and stuff of their respective owners.
These hardware designers have no duty nor intention to release source for their IP just because they're used in conjunction with an open source OS.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
Title should be "Please Every US Samsung User Read This"
Asks for country then zip code ? Dafuq?
We dont use zip codes, heck we dont even have a functional mail service.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA
Signed because this is important. And I don't think it's a bad idea to have a separate topic for this because not everyone lurks on the CM discussion/dev threads
NOT signed because this is really NOT important!
Samsung, will, I am sure, release what source code they can (for legal reasons, such as IP licensing) ONCE THEY RELEASE ICS for the SGS2.
They WON'T release the source code before that, as they are still changing the code and working on the features / bugs etc. to make ICS work on the SGS2.
No amount of b*tching from anyone will make a large multi-national like Samsung drastically change their development / release cycles *JUST* to keep a very small number of users happy.
... remember they're under NO OBLIGATION to release this source code in full... although I'm sure they will...
stuclark said:
NOT signed because this is really NOT important!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
WTF it's wrong with you? Who are you to say that?
Just because something isn't important for YOU, it does not mean that it isn't important at all! (No offense, but people like you annoy me really bad)
stuclark said:
Samsung, will, I am sure, release what source code they can (for legal reasons, such as IP licensing) ONCE THEY RELEASE ICS for the SGS2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's what we ask for. But "ONCE THEY RELEASE ICS for the SGS2" could mean anything from the same day till the same decade.
I hope you understand what I'm up to.
Protip: If you don't like the idea, stay out of the thread or, at least, don't post.
Thanks
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA
TheSniperFan said:
WTF it's wrong with you? Who are you to say that?
Just because something isn't important for YOU, it does not mean that it isn't important at all! (No offense, but people like you annoy me really bad)
That's what we ask for. But "ONCE THEY RELEASE ICS for the SGS2" could mean anything from the same day till the same decade.
I hope you understand what I'm up to.
Protip: If you don't like the idea, stay out of the thread or, at least, don't post.
Thanks
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What you don't seem to grasp is that Samsung DOES release its code within the month of releasing an official ROM (Update1, 2 and 3 of the Gingerbread source being the prime example of this). They release the source they CAN release. The petition is to put pressure on them for the rest of the source code, which I agree with stuclark, is quite possible will not happen. I signed the petition just in case to give an extra number to a petition I don't believe will matter.
stuclark is entitled to his opinion, as you are, so let him post what he wants. He did not do it in a cruel manner or with horrible intentions. He is in his right to not sign if he does not believe. This is just like a friend of mine who got bullied by students because she didn't wanna sign a petition.
And he is right you know, 5200 users as opposed to the millions of phones that were sold... Is a VERY small portion of the SGS2 community.
karendar said:
stuclark is entitled to his opinion, as you are, so let him post what he wants. He did not do it in a cruel manner or with horrible intentions. He is in his right to not sign if he does not believe. This is just like a friend of mine who got bullied by students because she didn't wanna sign a petition.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have no problems when someone is entitled to his/her opinion.
BUT (s)he said that "it isn't important".
However, as there are people who sign this petition (or would, if they knew that it exists) it's BS.
(S)he should have said that it's not important in her/his opinion. That's quite a difference.
Your "argument" is nice too. The typical "you can't change anything anyway" argument.
Congratulations, if you think that way.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA
ANDROID LOLLIPOP!
Hi all, let's have a conversation about Android's new version LOLLIPOP! !
LINK FOR ANDROID ANDI'S OFFICIAL THREAD! p31xx LINK
P51xx LINK
Rule #1: DO NOT ASK FOR ANY ETAs, DON'T ASK FOR A BUILD FOR YOUR DEVICE, JUST WAAAIT!
Rule #2: Press THANKS on Dev's post (when downloading build) (not mine)
Rule #3: ENJOY LOLLIPOP!
Current Devs working on it: @Android-Andi - P3110/P3113 & P5110
Google Apps here: LINK **Peform all updates via Play Store before opening Google apps**
Very useful Bug list by Peppercarto (thank him here): BUG LIST!
Galaxy Tab 2 7.0
P3110/P3113
UPDATE 12/05 - V0.7-2 ALPHA:
Get it on link above!
P3100
geti it on link above!
Video (thanks to SlimShady's): VIDEO
Galaxy Tab 2 10.1
P5110/P5113
Here it is! Another amazing job by Android-Andi!
UPDATE 12/05 - V0.7 ALPHA:
Get it on link above!
Marked as "untested", if you're not brave to install it, just wait next post with testing feedbacks!!
P5100
Not avaiable yet! :silly:
Narciso Neto said:
DISCUSSION ABOUT FUTURE PORTS
Hi all, as many of you should already know, Android 5.0 source code has been dumped to AOSP so coding and porting is already possible... As I'm seeing almost nothing about Lollipop to our devices, let's have this place for general chatting and speculations about the future builds!
Personally, I have some questions...
1- Are you guys excited about it or is just me?
2- Who you guys think that will be our 'hero' and port to our devices fisrt?
3- [4 DEVS] Are you considering to make a port of it?
4- What should be the major trouble in this version? (drivers, CPU, GPU, RAM, etc)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am very excited!!!
Came in here to see if there was a compile yet... We will see paranoid or cm first I'm wagering... Cm will be a few days off I'm guessing too. We have to wait for them to start most of these Roms.
Sent from my XT907 using XDA Free mobile app
mrkhigh said:
Came in here to see if there was a compile yet... We will see paranoid or cm first I'm wagering... Cm will be a few days off I'm guessing too. We have to wait for them to start most of these Roms.
Sent from my XT907 using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, I think CM will be releasing something on the start of december...
I already see some ports to Nexus devices (including 7 2012&2013), maybe someone who knows coding may port it for us as a preview or a test build, the same way that somebody tried with MIUI from Nexus 7 2013 \o/
A dev could attempt a vanilla asop build.
But I am not a dev
Sent from my XT907 using XDA Free mobile app
Narciso Neto said:
Yes, I think CM will be releasing something on the start of december...
I already see some ports to Nexus devices (including 7 2012&2013), maybe someone who knows coding may port it for us as a preview or a test build, the same way that somebody tried with MIUI from Nexus 7 2013 \o/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My friend actually thought me how to build from source, so I am going to try to build android l rom for tab 2 7" but i kind of forgot how, but i will let you guys know how it goes!
Heck yeah. CM said they'll start releasing nightlies in December
I am very very exited for lollipop for tab 2 :fingers-crossed::fingers-crossed::fingers-crossed::fingers-crossed::fingers-crossed::fingers-crossed::fingers-crossed::fingers-crossed::fingers-crossed::fingers-crossed::fingers-crossed::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::victory::victory::victory::victory::victory::victory:
But any genius dev who could make it
What if all the devs unite to make it
And I think a new recovery will be needed for it?
And I am just a 15 year old
bylithium said:
My friend actually thought me how to build from source, so I am going to try to build android l rom for tab 2 7" but i kind of forgot how, but i will let you guys know how it goes!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Count with me as a tester! haha lol
If you need someone to test, count with me too! Heh
And yup, I'm really excited! I guess CM or PA will be the first ones to release the ROMS for our Tabs. My only worry is about the CPU (kind of outdated).
Our hero could be:
@tuxafgmur he is (I think) the best developer for P51XX
I believe on @Android-Andi too, he's the guy for the whole Tab 2 community!
---------- Post added at 06:12 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:10 PM ----------
Well, this might be our little spark of hope
fr4n said:
Well, this might be our little spark of hope
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, for sure! Any new thing on OMAP4xxx should help devs...
All my hopes on Android-Andi (no pressure, just hopes! haha)
Narciso Neto said:
Yeah, for sure! Any new thing on OMAP4xxx should help devs...
All my hopes on Android-Andi (no pressure, just hopes! haha)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep, no pressure!
While we speak, more OMAP4xxx stuff are being pushed to CM12 branch. Really good sign
fr4n said:
Yep, no pressure!
While we speak, more OMAP4xxx stuff are being pushed to CM12 branch. Really good sign
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is Android Andi gone?
I can explain what happened.
When people got the news of omni rom booting on 5.0 then many people said him things like
So It will come to tab 2. Right?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think that you're the only one that can do this. Do not lose hope
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I continue to be amazed at the amount of work people do and freely give away.. then the howls from some when they move on to other projects. your efforts are greatly appreciated and fully understand the need to step back and review what life is sending your way
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And then he replied
Maybe not. IDK yet if i am able to maintain all the stuff i did on KitKat - life changes.
Then an idiot posted this
Yes Android-Andi you can do it. You are one of the best developers I have ever seen as you know other devs don't help users on other issues as you do. You make apps and kernels and other stuff that make people happy and inspired. You have the knowledge, the skills and the power to make a revolution in custom rom series that will the headlines of all major tech news forums and website - ''UPGRADE ANCIENT TAB 2 TO LOLLIPOP! ''.And this will make you very very famous. So famous that many people will donate to you for making roms that you will be so rich that you can buy a institute for teaching people on how to develop roms. I know you don't do it for money. I know you do it for respect and happiness that is the main motive of human life. Yes you can You can do it Andi we are with you. We the XDA members that when united can make a fully functioning iron man suit! So let's do it.
Regards
Sagnik
A 15 year old XDA user who respects all devs and members
And if you liked my post do press the like button
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And the idiot was me
<h1> </h1>
But before he could reply I replied this
Forgive me if you didn't like my above post I am sorry
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
<h1></h1>
Then Andi posted
Sure, i like to see that there are many user likeing my work and are thanksfull all the time.
I got a lot of sleepless nights in the past view month and can not manage that much work anymore.
If i like to work on L i do - if i don't like, i won't.
if people ask for ETAs all the time, then i try to compile for myself only and do not share anything! Maybe.a screenshot, but thats it.
Also please all together, stop writeing PM's asking for L!
And then I think we were going to get L but.......................... Dark_Cristian posted
any idea for lollipop develop? i just read this articile
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And then Andi posted
I am out guys, some never learn it.
So anyone who knows what happened?
@shsagnik, just headed to the thread and saw what happened. Well, some people really don't learn.
I just hope we didn't lost one of the biggest Tab 2 helpers around. And as he said, if he likes it, he will do it.
There's no sense on making pressure on him, it won't change nothing.
fr4n said:
@shsagnik, just headed to the thread and saw what happened. Well, some people really don't learn.
I just hope we didn't lost one of the biggest Tab 2 helpers around. And as he said, if he likes it, he will do it.
There's no sense on making pressure on him, it won't change nothing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really sorry about what happened, hope he come back and all of those stupid guys learn something...
Also, OFFICIAL NEWS ABOUT CYANOGENMOD 12: They said that initial works should be seen in the first days of next month or even in the ending of this month. Note: official nightlies only for devices with official device maintainers (don't know if Tab 2 still have one) :good::good::good:
Narciso Neto said:
Really sorry about what happened, hope he come back and all of those stupid guys learn something...
Also, OFFICIAL NEWS ABOUT CYANOGENMOD 12: They said that initial works should be seen in the first days of next month or even in the ending of this month. Note: official nightlies only for devices with official device maintainers (dont know if Tab 2 still have one) :good::good::good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There's also another developer which left. It's Varun, the guy who built AOSP 5.0 for Xperia L. Lots of questions on the development thread made him leave. Oh well, hope he comes back.
Afaik, we have no active maintainer. Codeworkx used to be our maintainer, but he left. Just sent an email to CyanogenMod about this.
fr4n said:
There's also another developer which left. It's Varun, the guy who built AOSP 5.0 for Xperia L. Lots of questions on the development thread made him leave. Oh well, hope he comes back.
Afaik, we have no active maintainer. Codeworkx used to be our maintainer, but he left. Just sent an email to CyanogenMod about this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Android-Andi did posted today on Cody's CyanogenMOD 11 thread, maybe he still up to dev or something...
Let's all make a new thread saying sorry to Andi.
Who is with me?
Sent from my GT-P3100 using XDA Free mobile app