I am using CM7 ROM and Glitch kernel together on the Verizon Fascinate and was just wondering what everyone is using for the I/O Scheduler and the CPU Governor with Voltage control.
I have mine OC'd to 1.5GHz and using bfq and performance.
that setup you are using will suck down battery in no time. Im running v13 from paid glitch app, smartass v2 with deadline and underclocked to 800mhz and get 5 hours of ACTUAL PHONE USE/SCREEN ON TIME and about a full day before needing a re-charge on an 1800ma samaung battery and the phone still flys. zero lag! You really dont need to run any more than 1 ghz, but 1.2ghz will give you crazy speed and still allow for some good batterylife. 1.5 is overkill.
davwman said:
that setup you are using will suck down battery in no time. Im running v13 from paid glitch app, smartass v2 with deadline and underclocked to 800mhz and get 5 hours of ACTUAL PHONE USE/SCREEN ON TIME and about a full day before needing a re-charge on an 1800ma samaung battery and the phone still flys. zero lag! You really dont need to run any more than 1 ghz, but 1.2ghz will give you crazy speed and still allow for some good batterylife. 1.5 is overkill.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
smartass is best in my opinion. It seems to run lower clocks more often when high clock is not needed.. I don't have smartass v2 for some reason
Sent from a beautiful miui fascinate
I use cfq and smartassv2. Here is a thread with explanations of all of the schedulers and governers, how they work and what ones are the best.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1309698
Using noop/smartass the last day or so...seems to be running smooth.
Smartass never seems to go below 400mhz on my phone. I've been using OnDemand.
I haven't really noticed any performance difference with any of the IO schedulers. Probably because it's flash and not a disk based drive in the phones.
jimv2000 said:
Smartass never seems to go below 400mhz on my phone. I've been using OnDemand.
I haven't really noticed any performance difference with any of the IO schedulers. Probably because it's flash and not a disk based drive in the phones.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
actually, I just noticed that as well. interesting find. Ill give ondemand with deadline a shot.
sageDieu said:
I use cfq and smartassv2. Here is a thread with explanations of all of the schedulers and governers, how they work and what ones are the best.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1309698
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks! This is an awesome post!
davwman said:
that setup you are using will suck down battery in no time. Im running v13 from paid glitch app, smartass v2 with deadline and underclocked to 800mhz and get 5 hours of ACTUAL PHONE USE/SCREEN ON TIME and about a full day before needing a re-charge on an 1800ma samaung battery and the phone still flys. zero lag! You really dont need to run any more than 1 ghz, but 1.2ghz will give you crazy speed and still allow for some good batterylife. 1.5 is overkill.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I do have it a little overkill, but I enjoy the speed when using some apps like games. My battery does last a whole day however with the 1800ma battery life, but then again all I use my phone for during the day is texting or VNC. I'm gonna try the smartass V2 and Deadline. Thanks!
I do quite a bit of gaming on my device (9mm, Dungeon Defenders, etc...). Overclock is set at 1.4 no UV, with absolutely no lock ups. BFQ and smartass yield the highest fps for me on V13RC.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
I thought we weren't supposed to use performance because it doesn't respect thermal safeguards. Am I correct?
Sent from my HP Touchpad using xda premium
bobloblaw1 said:
I thought we weren't supposed to use performance because it doesn't respect thermal safeguards. Am I correct?
Sent from my HP Touchpad using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I did not know that
Sent from a beautiful miui fascinate
Performance would be a bad idea over long periods of time. Essentially since it runs the phone at the highest possible frequency for 100% of the time, it stresses the CPU much more than any other option. This could cause overheating if used for too long, not to mention the toll on your battery. We all assume that it would decrease the life of your processor because it logically could, but that isn't a big deal sienc you'll likely be upgrading long before the processor would begin to fail regardless of what you do with it now.
lordnikko said:
I do quite a bit of gaming on my device (9mm, Dungeon Defenders, etc...). Overclock is set at 1.4 no UV, with absolutely no lock ups. BFQ and smartass yield the highest fps for me on V13RC.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Interesting, when I set BFQ and Smartass on mine I get force closes on the simple apps, for instance the internet browser or file viewer. But when I play games on it I dont get any force closes on the games.
Maybe try clearing data on voltage control & reflashing kernel. I have been running my current configuration on MIUI, CM7, and now Pool Party for the last 90 days or so with no issues.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Ok will do thanks!
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Is performance save
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Enyo. said:
Is performance save
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
?
Sent from my SCH-I500 using xda premium
Enyo. said:
Is performance save
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Assuming you mean "safe" then yes over short periods of time it's fine. If you tried to run at a high clock on performance all the time you would probably get heat and battery life problems.
I'm running miui and glitch v12 and I find it very strange that my phone runs really good (almost as good as any combination that I tested) on conservative governor.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using xda premium
mkropf said:
I'm running miui and glitch v12 and I find it very strange that my phone runs really good (almost as good as any combination that I tested) on conservative governor.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats not strange at all really. I've had it last multiple days with data and everything off, conservative, and underclocled to 800mhz when I needed to be away from a charger for a while.
and it performed really well.
Sent from my MIUI SCH-i500
Related
Every TF is different. Someone has reported being able to unvervolt by -250 or more. I don't know how the hell he did it. Anyway, I thought I'd start this thread to let people show off their OC and UV settings. I thought I could get a feel on what the stable limits are.
Remember, guys, it's only considered stable if the camera doesn't freeze. I don't care how much stress test you do. If your camera doesn't work, then it's not stable.
The 2 lowest clock settings there are, it's like 250 and 320 mhz or something I can run a 250 undervolt. This is extremely useful because I run on interactive and my tablet runs on almost no battery at all while on standby.
As for my underclocks up from that to about 1590s(My tablet can't handle 1600s) I have a steady 65 undervolt for all frequencies. I found battery life to be amazing...
Sent from my Inspire 4G using XDA Premium App
Hi there! What are you using to undervolt and/or overclock? I'm using CPU Master Free to overclock, but it doesn't have any undervolting options.
EDIT: also, which kernel are you using that supports Undervolting and Overclock?
Prime kernel doesnt seem to support uV at the moment
Blades does
Clemsyn does
Dont think netformer does
Settings im still playing and waiting for uV on prime kernel as ive found it the most stable at the moment will post back later
ThEiiNoCeNT said:
The 2 lowest clock settings there are, it's like 250 and 320 mhz or something I can run a 250 undervolt. This is extremely useful because I run on interactive and my tablet runs on almost no battery at all while on standby.
As for my underclocks up from that to about 1590s(My tablet can't handle 1600s) I have a steady 65 undervolt for all frequencies. I found battery life to be amazing...
Sent from my Inspire 4G using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Does your camera work when you set everything to -65? My camera will not work if I unvervolt 608 or 456 mhz.
QQ
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using Tapatalk
Yes it works, everything does.
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using xda premium
Now that we have a new way to overclock in v14 there are near unlimited variables to overclocking with this kernel. I've found a good balance of performance with 1300ghz step and live OC value of 121%. Let us know what has worked for you. You may include voltages as well.
I'm using reborn90's settings
200-1000; 110% live oc arm volt; 800/950/1100/1175 int volt; 1000/1000/1000/1025
Seems rather steady, I also recommend turning save on boot in settings of nstools before applying these settings just in case xD
Sent from my SCH-I500 using xda premium
I am on 100-1300 with 116% Live OC, haven't played with voltage yet but everything runs great.
I can't seem to get any live OC percentage stable and anything around 118% + automatically freezes and reboots.any suggestions?
Sent from my SCH-I500 using xda premium
mleonm5 said:
I can't seem to get any live OC percentage stable and anything around 118% + automatically freezes and reboots.any suggestions?
Sent from my SCH-I500 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you UV first then live oc? Or is it just stock voltages?
Sent from my SCH-I500 using xda premium
For the most part I just use stock voltages when playing around with live OC because I haven't found any voltages in threads that i'm sure are stable.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using xda premium
mleonm5 said:
For the most part I just use stock voltages when playing around with live OC because I haven't found any voltages in threads that i'm sure are stable.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it depends on how far you phone can go, some can oc more then others but some less then others, I usually never go passed 1.2ghz ,I'd rather save battery.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using xda premium
Just my opinion, but since Android 4.0 relies so heavily on the hardware rendering capabilities of the phone you'd be better off to UNDERCLOCK the CPU to 800mHz, and apply the Live OC to say 125% and have an effective CPU speed of 1000mHz while increasing the GPU clock by the same amount. I've tried it and it works very well but I didn't stick with it long enough to see how it affected battery life. You will need to modify your voltages though. I was at 1250mV on the 800mHz step.
If anyone is interested in just using stock settings, i found this thread interesting:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1424064
100-800 mhz, 125% live oc.
So how much of a change have you noticed from Stock kernel to Glitch. I tried OCing once.. and it froze.. and phone died.. and ended up having to wipe / re-flash. Probably user error though
Just wanted to say I accidentally OC'd to 1.4ghz with 110% LOC and man did this thing fly and didn't even crash.
Sent from my ICS Mesmerize
I noticed I'm able to achieve higher stable oc (over 1500) using low leakage voltage and live oc of 116 or less. Without low leakage i can barely acheive 1400 oc at anything over 110 live oc. Never noticed this much difference in internal voltage stability in previous kernel version. I wonder what's changed?
First off I apologize if there is a thread like this lying around somewhere.
Now I made this thread because I'm curious about what frequencies people usually have their phone running on.
Mine's
Min:100
Max:400
Governor: SmartassV2
Go ahead and post yours!
Sent from my SPH-D700 using xda premium
Fire n mage said:
First off I apologize if there is a thread like this lying around somewhere.
Now I made this thread because I'm curious about what frequencies people usually have their phone running on.
Mine's
Min:100
Max:400
Governor: SmartassV2
Go ahead and post yours!
Sent from my SPH-D700 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
Sorry but that must Lag beyond hell. haha
100/1000 Vr on Lagfree With Some UV.
Nah sweetass battery life on cm7 mi amigo .
Sent from my SPH-D700 using xda premium
damn 100/400.. lol i use 100/1460 on smartass
running 100, 200, 400, 600, 800, 1000, 1200
sio, and conservative or on demand.
on the ronnin5 samurai kernel
-25 uv across the board on all frequencies
When at work i can run podcasts on blue tooth for 5 hours, surf web on 4g (usually checking the forums) for 30 min during my 2 20 min breaks. This is my usual 8 to 9 hours from pulling it from the charger to getting home. Rarely do i have to swap batteries before i leave work (i have 3 batteries) but can usually make it home and toss it on the computer usb if i don't want to swap out my battery.
steviee7 said:
damn 100/400.. lol i use 100/1460 on smartass
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1460? Who's kernel is that the only ICS supported are Shuriken and Shadow which only hit 1400
matrix 15.5 is 1460, remember im on ns4g
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1361478
steviee7 said:
matrix 15.5 is 1460, remember im on ns4g
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1361478
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh i don't remember that. But whats the highest you've or it can overclock to?
XxLostSoulxX said:
AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
Sorry but that must Lag beyond hell. haha
100/1000 Vr on Lagfree With Some UV.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol noo actually I use 100-400 on conservative and it runs normal to me and I love the battery and I undervolted it too lol
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
lilajrestnom said:
Lol noo actually I use 100-400 on conservative and it runs normal to me and I love the battery and I undervolted it too lol
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I CALL BS. No Way in Hell not even on Any platform will it be fine it will lag and be unresponsive at those low frequencies.
Make a video and put it on Youtube i want to see this if i UV as well it also decreases performance but gains battery life.
Not that I've tried it... but we all know the Epic is more than twice as fast as some devices that run Android. In that case, how would running it at 40% speed make it unusable?
AndrewZorn said:
Not that I've tried it... but we all know the Epic is more than twice as fast as some devices that run Android. In that case, how would running it at 40% speed make it unusable?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Umm no thats wrong.
HTC EVO Shift 4G can be over-clocked to 1.9GHz from a stock 800 MHz: 110% OC
HTC Rezound can be overclocked to 1.99GHz from a stock 1.5GHz: 49-50% OC
Moto Droid X can be overclocked to 2GHz from a stock 1GHz: 100% OC
Theres plenty the Samsung Epic only has technically a 30% overclock and virtually a 50% overclock
But theres plenty of other phones with more over-clockability
I run 100/200/400/800/1000/1200 all stock. Its what samsung intended the hummingbird for (our processors were designed to go 1.2ghz iirc)
Sent from my CM7.2 OG Epic
1400-100 bfq smartassV2
XxLostSoulxX said:
I CALL BS. No Way in Hell not even on Any platform will it be fine it will lag and be unresponsive at those low frequencies.
Make a video and put it on Youtube i want to see this if i UV as well it also decreases performance but gains battery life.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Would cpu spy be enough for you to believe??
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
xopher.hunter said:
I run 100/200/400/800/1000/1200 all stock. Its what samsung intended the hummingbird for (our processors were designed to go 1.2ghz iirc)
Sent from my CM7.2 OG Epic
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well because our phones are 1.2GHz Stock but they lowered to 1GHz because that was the margin in 2010 for high end devices but they Under Clocked to save some battery. So technically we only came up with a 30% OC (1500MHz).
lilajrestnom said:
Would cpu spy be enough for you to believe??
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That will not show us how it performs I.E Lag. That will scroll smoothly and will stutter. running 400Mhz on max is still to low for no lag at all.
I could believe 100/600 or 200/800
That will not show us how it performs I.E Lag. That will scroll smoothly and will stutter. running 400Mhz on max is still to low for no lag at all.
I could believe 100/600 or 200/800[/QUOTE]
Lol but I swearrr its on 100-400 conservative lol
And it won't show if it lags which it seriously doesn't at allllll but if I've been using only 100, 200, and 400 mhz for the past 6 or 7 hours or longer then u know its not lagging cuz why would I put up with a day using my phone lagging everywhere just to prove something like this to you..
I downloaded screencast to take a video but it only let's me take 20seconds and when I played it it was all black and didn't show my screen
Ill try again to show you
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
lilajrestnom said:
Lol but I swearrr its on 100-400 conservative lol
And it won't show if it lags which it seriously doesn't at allllll but if I've been using only 100, 200, and 400 mhz for the past 6 or 7 hours or longer then u know its not lagging cuz why would I put up with a day using my phone lagging everywhere just to prove something like this to you..
I downloaded screencast to take a video but it only let's me take 20seconds and when I played it it was all black and didn't show my screen
Ill try again to show you
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It wont lag for doing nothing try going on to play simple games it lag, try browsing on the internet or stream music even with a good connection it still chips in n out because of low performance speeds.
XxLostSoulxX said:
It wont lag for doing nothing try going on to play simple games it lag, try browsing on the internet or stream music even with a good connection it still chips in n out because of low performance speeds.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol waitt I'm not saying its perfect or as good as running on 1000
But to me its very very very acceptable
Games is the only place it lags to a point where I can't take it
But I browse the internet (dolphin hd) and I use this app to get on here and I listen to music and txt and its all good now its not 100% perfect or very very very smooth but its really acceptable like I use it like this all the time so it should b acceptable
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
XxLostSoulxX said:
Well because our phones are 1.2GHz Stock but they lowered to 1GHz because that was the margin in 2010 for high end devices but they Under Clocked to save some battery. So technically we only came up with a 30% OC (1500MHz).
That will not show us how it performs I.E Lag. That will scroll smoothly and will stutter. running 400Mhz on max is still to low for no lag at all.
I could believe 100/600 or 200/800
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
100/600 Smartass V2 is lag free for me but I can deal with 400. Unless I'm scrolling on the internet lol. Don't get me wrong though, I bump it up to 1.2ghz when I'm gaming
Sent from my SPH-D700 using xda premium
I dint no if this is happening for anyone else but when I try to run antutu it gets to 1% then closes but it says its running in my notification bar anyone have any ideas on how to fix this
Sent from my SPH-L720 using xda premium
Antutu
Here the same problem.
Yesterday it worked properly (on my lg p700).
Was there an update??
The current version works for me.
Sent from my SPH-L720 using xda app-developers app
I have the same problem. You happen to be on ktoonz kernel?
Yea im on ktoonz kernel and I tested it on a couple different oc settings and I can only get it to frun on 1890 oc anything over that it closes after 1 percent
Sent from my SPH-L720 using xda premium
mderuelle said:
Yea im on ktoonz kernel and I tested it on a couple different oc settings and I can only get it to frun on 1890 oc anything over that it closes after 1 percent
Sent from my SPH-L720 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same problem here also running ktoonz kernal. Are you running his settings? hows your battery life?
Nyckrs said:
Same problem here also running ktoonz kernal. Are you running his settings? hows your battery life?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
im acctutalaly lnot running his settings im running rawiletechs or something and its butter smooth but it doesnt have the greatest battery but when i want my battery to last i just change the i/o scheduler and the governors to row and koonservative and my battery will last about a day and a half
mderuelle said:
im acctutalaly lnot running his settings im running rawiletechs or something and its butter smooth but it doesnt have the greatest battery but when i want my battery to last i just change the i/o scheduler and the governors to row and koonservative and my battery will last about a day and a half
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You won't be able to run Antutu with my settings. It heats up too fast. In my opinion Antutu sucks. It really does. I can get 14690 in quadrant with my settings. What good is it to have a benchmarking program if you have to underclock to run it? Pfft I'll pass on Antutu...annnnd...you're welcome lol!
What rom are you running?
Some of the developers include tweaks in their roms that clash with the kernel cause benchmarks to blow, but it doesn't affect if not actually improve real world performance.
For example, unknownforce had included some tweaks in ForceRom but once he removed them people's benchmarks back to normal. It's not the kernel, running Ktoonez's on my own modded stock gets me 14500 quadrants and 25k+ antutu.
Same goes for all the Blue Kuban users, Ruje included some tweaks implemented into his rom and those interfere with how the kernel runs the benchmarks - this "interference" isn't bad, it's just messes up the way the benchmarks run.
Plus - Antutu itself is very stressful on the CPU shooting up the temp to 70 degrees in about five seconds, so that can also be an issue.
Sent from my SPH-L720 using xda app-developers app
Im actually running force rom and ktoonz kernel and I have to underclock to run it. Kinda lame but I also think there is something wrong with my phone I get screen that changes colors and flashes purple its kinda weird
Sent from my SPH-L720 using xda premium
Ive been getting smoother results underclocking the G2 at either 1.7 or 1.9 and knock on seems more quick to response, but when I tried video recording the 60 fps isn't smooth when you are clocked at the regular speed.. beware...I ran a benchmark on quadrant standard and got 17,250 constantly so it is underclocked per core... I want to hear your opinion on this and do you plan to underclock or already are. I feel like the ability to be more smooth within the UI helps a lot more now..let me know your thoughts!
bencozzy said:
From using trickster mod and setcpu to underclock they only underclock cpu0 the other three still use the full frequency range.
What app are you using?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No frills CPU control :0
At 1.9 my Antutu was the same add the One and oddly the graphics test dropped 15-20 frames even though we are not under clocking the GPU.
Sent from my VS980 4G using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
That's really odd tbh o.o did you try quadrent as well? :0
jrgilbert79 said:
At 1.9 my Antutu was the same add the One and oddly the graphics test dropped 15-20 frames even though we are not under clocking the GPU.
Sent from my VS980 4G using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got way higher even at 1.7ghz :0
jrgilbert79 said:
At 1.9 my Antutu was the same add the One and oddly the graphics test dropped 15-20 frames even though we are not under clocking the GPU.
Sent from my VS980 4G using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
HeXaLox said:
I got way higher even at 1.7ghz :0
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're saying that by underclocking, you're getting a smoother UI but lower benchmarks?
No i got a higher benchmark than the guy who replied on my post. I did get a smoother UI and everything is less laggy. Ill post a pic of 2.3ghz idk if its actually at 1.7ghz or 2.3ghz ill do another test
whittikins said:
You're saying that by underclocking, you're getting a smoother UI but lower benchmarks?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All this is true. Just tried. It might be a TINY bit slower ui THOUGH
Sent from my LG-D800 using Tapatalk 4
What settings did toy use? Deadline? Noop? Interactive gov?
Sent from my VS980 4G using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
I am using the app called No-frills CPU Control and for 1.7ghz I am using row and Ondemand as the I/O governor and same settings for the regular clock as well..
jrgilbert79 said:
What settings did toy use? Deadline? Noop? Interactive gov?
Sent from my VS980 4G using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Underclocked at 1.7ghz first then regular clock at 2.27ghz
jrgilbert79 said:
What settings did toy use? Deadline? Noop? Interactive gov?
Sent from my VS980 4G using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am tending to believe that the regular clock speed is actually overclocked...just like how the galaxy s4 is overclocked 200mhz more than normal...however I could be wrong..
If you really want to see if this odd issue is actually happening download an app called Multicore CPU Control (the only app of its kind that seems to work with the LG G2). I use this to save battery by turning off all but one core, but it allows you full control over all your cores.
Download it, create a profile, and set each core to what you want. I had to save the profile first, then go back in to edit the latter 3 cores' frequencies.
I would suggest setting the min and max to the same and choosing Performance for the governor. Use a different app to set the scheduler.
Be sure to have something like Kernel Tuner to ensure that all your cores are running as you intended. If not, go back into Multicore CPU Control and re-save your profile again.
Would love to hear the results afterwards!
I used Multicore CPU Control.
The only way to set clock to CPU 1,2,3 is let them always active. If I leave dynamic for these cores, they still go up to 2,26 GHZ. I think this the reason why HeXaLox have a little decrement when underclock because it only did for one core.