This is pretty interesting. Check out the press release. Think they're cooking up a 3.2 ROM for the GT10?
http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/10/...10-1-and-springboard-combines-4g-ta/#comments
(read the press release)
slack04 said:
This is pretty interesting. Check out the press release. Think they're cooking up a 3.2 ROM for the GT10?
http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/10/...10-1-and-springboard-combines-4g-ta/#comments
(read the press release)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Samsung supports multiple versions of OS based on model and region. The newest ROMs for the SGS2 run on 2.3.3, 2.3.4, and 2.3.5, based on the region of the phone. They might not update the Wi-Fi Tab just to give it 3.2 but would use 3.2 in the next maintenance release they issue. I'm sure because the T-Mobile Tab has a different radio than the international 3G version there was additional s/w work needed so they used the latest OS as a base.
BarryH_GEG said:
Samsung supports multiple versions of OS based on model and region. The newest ROMs for the SGS2 run on 2.3.3, 2.3.4, and 2.3.5, based on the region of the phone. They might not update the Wi-Fi Tab just to give it 3.2 but would use 3.2 in the next maintenance release they issue. I'm sure because the T-Mobile Tab has a different radio than the international 3G version there was additional s/w work needed so they used the latest OS as a base.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure, all manufacturers do that. What's interesting here is that there's a possibility of a GT10 running Honeycomb 3.2.
Related
Recently a new firmware P1000JVJL1 showed up under the Arabic section at samfirmware.com, but it was confirmed that it was NOT an arabic firmware but euro instead.
So I flashed it just to feed my curiosity and it was true. Euro definitely, had Turkish locale too, but that uses normal English lettering.
http://www.samfirmware.com/WEBPROTECT-p1000.htm
Wow another firmware, who said samsung was slow on firmware releases!! I take it this is the latest version, notice any changes and did it wipe everything?
hi!! thanks for the news, olny one question, does this version have italian language and will i have problem upgrading from jma to this?? i've update to jma and would like to know if there will be any problem...thanks in advance..
xoltrix2000 said:
Recently a new firmware P1000JVJL1 showed up under the Arabic section at samfirmware.com, but it was confirmed that it was NOT an arabic firmware but euro instead.
So I flashed it just to feed my curiosity and it was true. Euro definitely, had Turkish locale too, but that uses normal English lettering.
http://www.samfirmware.com/WEBPROTECT-p1000.htm
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if i remember right, then is JV for the region
the following j for 2010
the following l is the month (were we have actually m in the jma version)
and the 1 is version one.
so i don´t really see were this firmware should be a newer one than xxjma
abuser0815 said:
so i don´t really see were this firmware should be a newer one than xxjma
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As far as I'm aware the M builds are test builds and not formal releases.
An L would indicate a December build, so it is quite possible it is newer than JMA.
Regards,
Dave
foxmeister said:
As far as I'm aware the M builds are test builds and not formal releases.
An L would indicate a December build, so it is quite possible it is newer than JMA.
Regards,
Dave
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
jma was also released in december, so who says that is a newer version, and from where it cames thats an euro version? if it has turkish on board and english lettering, that says nothing. any other languages in?
Any chance you checked what the build date on this one was and what CSCs it includes?
abuser0815 said:
jma was also released in december, so who says that is a newer version, and from where it cames thats an euro version?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I said that it was "quite possible" that it's newer than JMA, not that it is definitely newer.
Consider the following - JMA is a development build (we know this). At some point that development build will get completed and released, and when it does it ceases to be an "M" build and will follow the conventional naming sequence. If that build is released in December, it will be an L build.
It remains to be seen what this actually is, but we certainly shouldn't discount it based on there being an M build in existence.
Regards,
Dave
i´m downloading it. will see what it says on my tab and if the build date is newer than jma.
will report later....
abuser0815 said:
i´m downloading it. will see what it says on my tab and if the build date is newer than jma.
will report later....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Am doing the same now.
Should I continue?
The filesystem dates of the flashable files seem to indicate that JMA is newer, and the build numbers confirm that assumption: 759588 > 739553 (07/12/2010 > 01/12/2010)
deezid said:
Am doing the same now.
Should I continue?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you can stop it if you want.
i think this firmware is not newer as jma, as file dates are from 30.nov / 1.dec.
jma files are newer. for that i will not flash it to my tab unless somebody really proofes me that:
a) its a newer version,
and
b) its an euro-version.
Ok tried it
This firmware is for the turkish tablet and it doesn't contain the fixed browser (introduced in JM6)
Dennis
abuser0815 said:
for that i will not flash it to my tab unless somebody really proofes me that:
a) its a newer version,
and
b) its an euro-version.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Read the post just above yours (info extracted directly from mounted RFS filesystem).
Darn, was hoping it was the released version of JMA!
daniel.weck said:
Read the post just above yours (info extracted directly from mounted RFS filesystem).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
we wrote our posts at the same time, so i´ve readen it after i posted
foxmeister said:
As far as I'm aware the M builds are test builds and not formal releases.
An L would indicate a December build, so it is quite possible it is newer than JMA.
Regards,
Dave
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Traditionally, Milestone and Prototype are internal. However in the SGS series we have repeatedly seen them on "production" releases (yes, both M and P).
In truth it is now hardly possible to compare newness based on name alone. There have been instances where (x) has been newer than (z) as well. Not to mention the last character can only be compared if comparing to the exact same region and product codes.
Everytime I try to update my GT I receive a msg saying "This version cannot be updated". I tried updating kies, still the same, restored the tab to default and removed root, still the same, used the *272* to change locale, also still the same. Any idea what the solution might be?
My baseband version is: P1000JXJK2
Sent from my GT-P1000 using XDA App
You didn't actually state which version you are currently running!
Regards,
Dave
foxmeister said:
You didn't actually state which version you are currently running!
Regards,
Dave
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My baseband version is: P1000JXJK2
Anyone? Anything?
It is quite possible that JK2 is the latest official version for your region. I believe that the latest official version on UK Tabs is a JJ version which would be older than yours.
Regards,
Dave
yes, i got a JID since november and still the same on kies, "this version cannot be updated"
... no updates, while there should be evident bug fixes for that "bending gsensor"
thank samsung for that
foxmeister said:
It is quite possible that JK2 is the latest official version for your region. I believe that the latest official version on UK Tabs is a JJ version which would be older than yours.
Regards,
Dave
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
According to samfirmware: http://www.samfirmware.com/WEBPROTECT-p1000.htm
there are newer builds for my region (arabic).
In the old Kies it said that there's an update but your version can't be upgraded :0(
Just because a firmware is listed on samfirmware, doesn't mean that Samsung have pushed them out via Kies.
Looking at the list of Arabic ROMs on samfireware, I can see that there are several JMx builds - as far as I am aware, none of the JMx builds have ever been pushed out by Kies and are considered development test builds.
That leaves JVJL1 as the only later build, but this thread would indicate that isn't actually an Arabic ROM at all and thus wouldn't have been pushed out to Arabic Tabs.
Regards,
Dave
i have seen jma in the wild in the uk http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=914744
Hi,
I have Samsung Galaxy 3 - I5801, with good exp of Android 2.1 - eclair version.
I want to upgrade it to next available higher version, which one should i go for it.. Froyo or which higher version which is available and supported to I5801.
Your help is required in this ...
Sumit
As of now only froyo is the upgrade option for us. If you are from India you can do it from Kies, but the latest version (JP4) has bugs in it, but is usable enough.
If you want to flash other roms, go through the roll up thread in the development section and you will know.
XXJPM,JPQ are few of the froyo upgardes for I5800 in europe, which will work fine with our phones also.
Go through the forum...its filled with info. If you need anymore help, do post.
Trying to update Incredible from 2.2 to 2.3. Build 3.26.605.1, baseband 2.15.00.07.28
I started to run the OTA update from this thread http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=770091 but the baseband version is different. So where do I go from here?
Quick search found this.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1263269
Also your version numbers are off, 2.3 is 4.06.605.3 baseband 2.15.10.7.7
No, my version numbers aren't off. I currently have 2.2, those version numbers refer to my current build. I'm trying to GET 2.3
jester369 said:
No, my version numbers aren't off. I currently have 2.2, those version numbers refer to my current build. I'm trying to GET 2.3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The base band is the radio version. The reason it's different is because it comes with the OTA to update it to .07.07.
EDIT: According to the post, "First off, ensure that you have the Stock 2.1 ROM with first OTA, it WILL NOT work otherwise.
software/Build version will read as the following: 1.22.605.2..."
Looks like you need to be at 2.1 to run that update.
Got it working. Rooted Froyo, then loaded the Liberation ROM. Extremely happy with it!!
Thank you for your input guys!
hi guys..i owning an atrix 2.3.4 which asia retail version. i try to find it at firmware thread at development there but most of that is 2.2.2. so is that anyway or any place i can find it ? the system info as below
System Version: 45.31.0.MB860.AsiaRetail.en.03
Android Version: 2.3.4
Baseband Version: N_01.100.00R
Webtop Version: WT-1.2.0-133_38
Kernel Version: 2.6.32.9 [email protected]#3
APflex Version:
GAS_ASIA_USAOLYGBSEARET_P011
GAS_ASIA_USAOLYGBSEARET_A003
GAS_ASIA_USAOLYEMSEARET_M001
Build Number: 4.5.2A-74_OLE-31
http://www.filefactory.com/f/89f588286a560e39/
hmm..i just see the me retail only..is this the full sbf?
Am also from asia- manila.. im using an at&t us version atrix. Id recommend a cwm flashable firmware instead of an sbf based firmware. Running on cm7 nightly
Sent from my MB860
chonkit said:
hmm..i just see the me retail only..is this the full sbf?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There's a SEA-Retail sbf in there. Look for the one that ends with "-searet". And yes, it's the full stock sbf.
As has been warned many times in this forum, if you don't know what you're doing, DO NOT flash an sbf. It might brick your phone. Although 4.5.2A is the latest version for SEA (which means it should be safe - bricking only occurs when downgrading), I'd still recommend caution.
i c..so after i unlocked and flash custom rom, can i use this sbf to back to stock and perform ota? or after unlocked bl, i could not use ota if it is available..
Sent from my MB860 using XDA
You can use that to go back to stock, but only if you were on the same/earlier build. Do not use sbf to downgrade.
hmm..ok..mean that if i flash custom rom from 4.5.2A version of 2.3.4, if wan to go back stock, i only can flash this 4.5.2A sbf to get back to stock rite?
bigboy_r said:
Am also from asia- manila.. im using an at&t us version atrix. Id recommend a cwm flashable firmware instead of an sbf based firmware. Running on cm7 nightly
Sent from my MB860
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i c..but i using international asia version..
chonkit said:
hmm..ok..mean that if i flash custom rom from 4.5.2A version of 2.3.4, if wan to go back stock, i only can flash this 4.5.2A sbf to get back to stock rite?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes.
that's nice..thank for the answer..by the way, can I still update to official ics through ota update if Motorola release it using this sbf? it won't brick my device right?
You *should* be able to update from stock ROM, but since official ICS isn't out yet, we still don't know if Moto changes anything in their update policy. They could in theory prevent the updates to be installed on unlocked devices.
In any case, when the official update hits, I'll bet the devs are gonna be all over it anyway...
ok..maybe i will just unlocked it and use because i not sure when is ics will release for international version..thanks for help ya..
ICS has only been confirmed for US (AT&T) devices. Other regions are still "under evaluation". Seeing how the US version is currently on 2.3.6 and other regions on 2.3.4, I wouldn't bet on Motorola releasing ICS internationally unless there's a huge pressure from users like with Milestone's Froyo update.
so there might had chance that international version might not get the ics upgrade?
Yes. Looking at Motorola's update history, there's a chance that the international version won't get ICS (at least officially).
i see..but motorola update schedule listed the asia retail as ics upgrade in planing. so it might fail during the process?
From Motorola's Upgrade News:
PHASE 1 – EVALUATION & PLANNING: During this phase, we evaluate the benefits, technical issues and user experience of an upgrade. Generally, we are not able to provide release dates in this stage. There are also some cases in which we can state that an upgrade will happen but are not able to provide a release date. Please note that some products that enter the Evaluation and Planning phase may not complete the upgrade cycle.
wow..seriously speechless..but then never mind. if its fail, I still can grab custom rom that based on at&t ics right?
Yes. I do hope we get an official ICS release, though.