This Thread are for bug Report Such As:
Battery Drain
Unstable
Stability
Kernel Bug
ROM bug
Etc.
I think dev's are on smth about kernel right now, dx's @what has been done in dev [email protected] list is empty,racht is looking busy right now,i think Blagus is helping them too.
There no announcement about it because it still in early alpha,without "noise" devs can smoothly finish their work.
Due the change in 1st message my post is useless,delete it please.
FreeXperia is silently developing one already.
See there Github.
I can't believe FXP is developing Kernels i check it out
Thanks Dedii.
I made custom kernel.sin but now I have to flash stock 2.1 first because something's wrong on 2.3
Or, as FXP said, NAND initialization is incorrect.
BTW, for kernel developers, you have to pack Image, not zImage.
Please stop with off-topic.
I flashed my kernel and it works. However, [email protected] machine name persists.
Anyways, take a look at this:
Code:
<5>[ 0.000000] Linux version 2.6.29 ([email protected]) (gcc version 4.5.2 (Sourcery G++ Lite 2011.03-42) ) #1 PREEMPT Thu Aug 18 16:30:18 CEST 2011
I need to make some more tweaks, pack correct ramdisk and remove [email protected] machine/user name.
Will update tonight or tomorrow
Blagus said:
Please stop with off-topic.
I flashed my kernel and it works. However, [email protected] machine name persists.
Anyways, take a look at this:
Code:
<5>[ 0.000000] Linux version 2.6.29 ([email protected]) (gcc version 4.5.2 (Sourcery G++ Lite 2011.03-42) ) #1 PREEMPT Thu Aug 18 16:30:18 CEST 2011
I need to make some more tweaks, pack correct ramdisk and remove [email protected] machine/user name.
Will update tonight or tomorrow
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow! Thanks a bunch.
@Blagus
I think that the X10 mini and mini pro kernels can work on Android 2.1 and above. Is this NAND initialization problem affecting them as well?
And was there some sort of patch or something that FXP was providing on X10 dev forums with regard to custom kernel compatibility? Just a question .
what's the differents of .ko modules and build in.
please make CPU and GPU overclock
Cpu Oc Ok
Gpu oc ?? Im not sure
hi
sorry if it seems stupid but i happened to experience that oc module in gingercruzt 7.3 is better than normal oc module, it has 60kb of file size and with GC module i can overclock my cpu to 780mhz without any problem, though with normal oc module with 4kb i can only reach 748mhz of oc, if you could please test it and see if it do the same for you guys cuz i think it will be better to use better modules in kernel
@superuser.angga
blagus n u also make a good kernel for us.. thanks man..
hmm.... if both of u dev together i thing it will top best kernel for X8...
team work together man!!!
Cheer...
Send from my ST15i using XDA Premium App
Xperia X8-GingerCruZt 7.4b
XperiaMini-????
[email protected]®
can you add usb host support to your kernel?
(http://sven.killig.de/android/N1/2.2/usb_host/)
ps: this one is for the zte blade (same chipset)
http://sven.killig.de/android/Blade/usb_host/
kakho55 said:
@superuser.angga
blagus n u also make a good kernel for us.. thanks man..
hmm.... if both of u dev together i thing it will top best kernel for X8...
team work together man!!!
Cheer...
Send from my ST15i using XDA Premium App
Xperia X8-GingerCruZt 7.4b
XperiaMini-????
[email protected]®
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi, you´ve just forgot to mention FXP team which already testing v24 with their custom kernel also . Let´s wait till we get them released
biscoitu said:
Hi, you´ve just forgot to mention FXP team which already testing v24 with their custom kernel also . Let´s wait till we get them released
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hehe... really forgot ...
thank for remind dude...
Send from my ST15i using XDA Premium App
Xperia X8-GingerCruZt 7.4b
XperiaMini-????
[email protected]®
Deleted some rants...again
Just a little remind for kernel developers, remember to post your Github( or whatever) source code for GPL compliance when it done.
Thanks.
af974 said:
Deleted some rants...again
Just a little remind for kernel developers, remember to post your Github( or whatever) source code for GPL compliance when it done.
Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I try to push to github but no luck
i have uploading problem here
is this new kernel will be work for any ROMs sir?like stock,custom,stock build 47,06,C.0.0?can't wait to try it..
When we will can download and try your kernel?
wierd :S
hi all i unlocked my bootloader and needed to see if i cud use omnius to unlock my phone after. it all went okay untill i switched the phone back off and put other sim into it. thats when the fun thing happend lol . it blocked the signal of my phone so it made me more determind to find a way to have both . so i restored earlyer TA backup and it was sim locked again. then i unlocked it for the second time and then i used msm7227_setool2 to see if i could unlock the bootloader without it blocking signal but to my surprise i was left with a sim unlocked phone by omnius and a unlocked bootloader :d this may not work again but just wanted to share my amazment with you as really it should have signal bricked my phone again but it never and now i got both lol
Related
I have made a quick patch for premature flash problem in evo kernels. I have tested it with hastarin source taken from his git repository.
This is a quick patch and somebody with more knowledge in android kernels can make a better solution.
The problem is not in premature flash but in missing flash. In desire kernels camera flash is activated twice (function msm_camera_flash in msm_camera.c) first time with low intensity (MSM_CAMERA_LED_LOW) and second time, while taking a picture, with high intensity (MSM_CAMERA_LED_HIGH). In evo kernels flash is activated only once with low intensity and because of that we only see the first activation of flash/led. Maybe someone knows from where the function msm_camera_flash is called and add a second call to that function with high intensity.
EDIT:
zImage with wifi modules on post:
h__p://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=8635032&postcount=46
Congratulations on finding that. It makes sense a lot.
UPDATE: Everybody can now use hastarin 7.4 kernel since its updated with the code in this thread. Credit goes to mdebeljuh
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=787588
Thank you very much mdebeljuh!
what we have to do with your file? can you provide how to steps?
How do i have to install this patch?
it's a kernel patch. if you don't know how to use it, you'll have to wait till one of the kernal-builders will implement it. hastarin and michyprima are very quick at adopting patches.
For testing
Ok, for testing purposes i have attached the latest hastarin kernel with patch included
mdebeljuh said:
Ok, for testing purposes i have attached the latest hastarin kernel with patch included
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you m8...will test it right now
@ Screemi
Thanks for explaining it so detailled...
Yes how do we use this patch file ?
First you need to know how to compile the kernel:
h__p://htc-linux.org/wiki/index.php?title=QuickDeveloperStartGuide#Kernel
Next you can apply the patch to the source you have downloaded from git and compile the kernel with, i hope, working flash.
You can use the patch with the next command (execute from your local git repository root directory)
patch -p1 < /path_to_patch/0001-Patch-for-premature-flash-missing-flash.patch
Thank you for your work
I can confirm, flash triggers as intended in a dark room.
Also I've let the developers know about it, Cass said he will do some tests as well.
Good work!
wow! its working! nice! thanks
please upload modules for this kernel
mdebeljuh said:
Ok, for testing purposes i have attached the latest hastarin kernel with patch included
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi, thank you !
Is this based on hastarin 7.3 version?
Thanks
Sent from my HTC HD2 using XDA App
Yes it is based on hastarin sources from Friday October 15 2010
hi..
i tested this Zimage..
flash work.. but not work WIFI ..
i cant use in mdeejay froyo sense v.2.2 nextsense
mdebeljuh said:
Yes it is based on hastarin sources from Friday October 15 2010
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OK, so I have to upgrade to 7.3 Wi-Fi module..
Thank you!
Sent from my HTC HD2 using XDA App
mannyy said:
hi..
i tested this Zimage..
flash work.. but not work WIFI ..
i cant use in mdeejay froyo sense v.2.2 nextsense
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First you have to upgrade to version 7.3 modules..
Sent from my HTC HD2 using XDA App
iosub said:
First you have to upgrade to version 7.3 modules..
Sent from my HTC HD2 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
modules for kernel without OC
mdebeljuh said:
Ok, for testing purposes i have attached the latest hastarin kernel with patch included
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
tested..work as it should be..
but we need .ko file error on wifi..
edit..
ups didn't see post above..so this is base on 7.3 no OC..
Please post all feedback/comments to do with the FreeKernel here
DO NOT SPAM THE BOOTLOADER CRACKING THREAD, IT IS FOR DEVELOPERS ONLY.
zdzihu said:
The bootloader has been bypassed using the kexec/miniloader method
We are able to boot custom kernels now!
Anyway... this is the first release of the fully working custom kernel (flashable via xRecovery). I haven't had much time to work on it so it's kind of proof-of-concept. Tested for 48h without any problem (not even a reboot).
FreeKernel-alpha1:
http://www.mediafire.com/?d8v914keiqsmc3n
This is the alpha version of custom 2.6.29 kernel based on the SE sources. I do not plan to work on this release anymore - it is just for testing purpose. From today on I'll start to port SE stuff to the latest (GBread) kernel.
Changes:
- removed 32 fps cap
- implemented netfilter (Droid wall, native USB/wifi tethering etc.)
- undervolted to 0.950mV to save battery
- don't remember what else I did, I bet something nasty
- super ugly boot logo!
Requirements:
- baseband .52 + the relevant kernel
- clean 2.1 ROM, compatibile with .52 baseband (e.g. .504)
- working xRecovery
Please note I am not responsible for any damage this software may cause to your device! Use it at your own risk!
There is absolutely no support for this alpha release!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So, if you want to test this new kernel, please keep in mind it is only compatible with stock 2.1 firmwares (.504 and above) that are compatible with baseband 52.
It is only for testing purposes, and any feedback for this alpha kernel is purely for the benefit of others, Z is not and will not be supporting this version, do not expect it to be ready for daily use!
Please post your results and how you get on with the kernel.
Video of FreeKernel
http://vimeo.com/21838810
does anyone know how to embed it?
I tested the kernel on baseband .46 on TripNMIUI 0.3.2, and the removal of the FPS cap is incredible, the phone is so much smoother and fluid it is unbelievable - it is like having a new phone. I noticed the screen feels a lot more responsive aswell!.
Obviously it is not at all compatible with the ROM, there is no radio and there are frequent reboots, but just a taster in terms of things to come
Apologies for the poor video, but I think its enough to get the general gist of the smoothness
Tried custom kernel just for kicks on trips miui 3.2...bb 54 and up super unstable no network/wifi tons of reboots....
bb 52 and bb49 no network but wifi IS working no sd card mount though
gonna test other roms aswell....
For install custom kernel to be need xrec by Z not from flashtool.
All works, clean install bb 2.0.46 and 2.0.A.0.504.
Dont problems.
I done back to my custom rom way xrec and flashed the patch bb.49, nothing problem.
cheers
this will not work on bb .46 i have tried and failed. no network at all. have tried on several roms... only eternity roms are working on this kernel on bb .52....
supposedly it is suppose to work with bb .49 have not tested on this bb so i cant say for sure.
guaranteed on .52 build 504...
results on quadrant show fps cap has been removed.
overclock is not possible but undervolting is
colors have not yet changed but should upon release of other custom kernels
Can I brick my x10 with this or only bootloop it (because bootloop is fixable with SEUS)
will this work with freex10 and can anyone give me a link to the main thread where zdhihu posted this? i can't find it. thanks.
PlayGunsta said:
Can I brick my x10 with this or only bootloop it (because bootloop is fixable with SEUS)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can't brick it as you only flash some files to the system, and you should still be able to access xrecovery if it bootloops
THIS IS ONLY USABLE WITH STOCK 2.1 ON. 52 BASEBAND!!!
This is a test kernel not meant as anything more than a proof of concept. There is absolutely no reason to flash this unless you are personally working on making your own custom kernels. This kernel is not even an alpha release, it will never be developed or supported. If you choose to flash it just to toy around don't whine about functionality.
When custom kernels are available anything the hardware is capable of and drivers can be written for will be possible. Everyone needs to calm down and quit asking the same questions over and over.
Sent from my X10i using XDA Premium App
Have uploaded a video, does anyone know how to embed it in the post?
Thanks for the video!
a2ha said:
Thanks for the video!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no problem
BTW. will it work on Freex10?
a2ha said:
BTW. will it work on Freex10?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No. Z posted it in the bootloader cracking thread. This is only meant for stock 2.1 FW on. 49-.52 BB and is not functional for daily use. This is only meant as a test if you want a stable new kernel its still going to take a little while.
Sent from my X10i using XDA Premium App
a2ha said:
BTW. will it work on Freex10?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It won't work with any ROM 100% - its just designed for testing, you won't be able to use it for daily use yet.
If you just want to try it out, its possible it will boot up on freex10 and you will see the effects of not having a FPS cap - but it is unlikely the majority of things will work, like radio etc. as it is meant for stock 2.1 roms.
If you do want to try it, make a backup on xrecovery first
I dont know what you have xD
What do you mean with "its not ready for dayly use" ?
I use it now since yesterday afternoon and everything works perfect!
I had no random reboots and everything is very smooth!
My Battery lost 1 % with stable 1 Ghz (playing around and testing).
So not be scared! flash it!
Whitecookie said:
What do you mean with "its not ready for dayly use" ?
I use it now since yesterday afternoon and everything works perfect!
I had no random reboots and everything is very smooth!
My Battery lost 1 % with stable 1 Ghz (playing around and testing).
So not be scared! flash it!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As in its only supported by the stock 2.1 ROM, and if you run into any problems with it, its not being supported so you won't get a fix
so for example if i install this kernel on my freex10, how can i remove it later if i have problems with it?
a2ha said:
so for example if i install this kernel on my freex10, how can i remove it later if i have problems with it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Create a backup on xrecovery before installing it, and then when you need to go back just restore it
Hey . Is this really working cos owain in ours minipro forums said its only first april joke, and we cant yet load custom kernel. Is there any difference between x10 bootloader and minis ??? How long it will take to do a fully working roms , softs to ours xperias ???
Sent from my X10minipro using XDA App
@ Whitecookie:
Do you use the .504 2.1 ROM?
Does someone if it works with 2.0.2 (the ROM which Eminence V1.2 is based on) works 100% with this kernel?
===============================
UrukConfig 1.1.0
Release - Link
Release Mod (w/ Rescue Menu) - Link
UrukConfig 1.1.2
Release - Link
===============================
UrukDroid 1.0/1.1 patch
Sibere kernel patch V13 (UrukDroid 1.0/1.1 stable and OC patch) - Link
Sibere kernel patch V15 (UrukDroid 1.0 stable and OC patch) - Link
Sibere kernel patch V15 for UD1.5! (UrukDroid 1.5 stable and OC patch) - Link
===============================
UrukDroid 1.1
-->INDEX<--
http://sauron.pourix.com/UrukDroid/UrukDroid-1.1
1.1B2
kernel: - Link
update: - Link
1.1B3
kernel: - Link
1.1RC1 - Link
1.1RC2 - Link
===============================
UrukDroid 1.5
-->INDEX<--
http://sauron.pourix.com/UrukDroid/UrukDroid-1.5/
1.5b1 - Link
1.5b2 - Link
1.5b3 - Link
1.5RC1 - Link
1.5 (Public Release) - Link
1.5 (OverClock kernel & 1.5b fix) - Link
1.5.1 (Required 1.5) - Link
1.5.1 (OverClock kernel) - Link
1.5.1 (Smaller soft button) - Link
===============================
UrukDroid 1.6
-->INDEX<--
http://sauron.pourix.com/UrukDroid/UrukDroid-1.6/
1.6B1
kernel: - Link
OC: - Link
1.6RC1 - Link
===============================
Hi leon,
Very cool summary thumbs up!
It would be great if you would give a little info text for the newbies, just a tip
Greets
Lenn
Can we use sibere kernel patch with the latest UrukDroid kernel 1.5b3?
Sent from my A101IT using XDA Premium App
waterpolo said:
Can we use sibere kernel patch with the latest UrukDroid kernel 1.5b3?
Sent from my A101IT using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No because sauron did code complete fresh for urukdroid 1.5 , thats why it called 1.5
I think sibere just work at his new kernel, when he have enough time
We should remember that all devs dont get paid and they do this as their hobbys like me(not as a dev)
Lenn said:
No because sauron did code complete fresh for urukdroid 1.5 , thats why it called 1.5
I think sibere just work at his new kernel, when he have enough time
We should remember that all devs dont get paid and they do this as their hobbys like me(not as a dev)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But you do the general support which is very useful for the XDA users
Sent from my A101IT using XDA Premium App
waterpolo said:
But you do the general support which is very useful for the XDA users
Sent from my A101IT using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Right
@Leon:
I really dont want to hijack this thread, but i could write a little text to every entry here, this evening but only if you want this
Lenn said:
Right
@Leon:
I really dont want to hijack this thread, but i could write a little text to every entry here, this evening but only if you want this
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Orz..Lenn, call me Leo, NG is my last name in Hong Kong and China.
btw, what do you mean?
LeoNg628 said:
Orz..Lenn, call me Leo, NG is my last name in Hong Kong and China.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ah okey
btw, what do you mean?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I mean that i or we should write a little text to eafh OS you listed here, for these ones who havent got so much knowledge so they can choose better but only if you want
Uruk is mispelled in the thread title...I'm just sayin'
Have a great day.
strongergravity said:
Uruk is mispelled in the thread title...I'm just sayin'
Have a great day.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
oh thx!
Lenn said:
Ah okey
I mean that i or we should write a little text to eafh OS you listed here, for these ones who havent got so much knowledge so they can choose better but only if you want
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sure, but I dont know about other OS, any suggestion?
LeoNg628 said:
sure, but I dont know about other OS, any suggestion?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No^^you didnt understand me right..
I want to write a little text for each OS you already have found.
with this the neewbies here can choose better
Lenn said:
No^^you didnt understand me right..
I want to write a little text for each OS you already have found.
with this the neewbies here can choose better
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
oic, let do it.
LeoNg628 said:
oic, let do it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep, i think i will start this eve
hey guys,
dont wanna backstab u - but most of the worrk already is in the stick thread I created some weeks ago:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1198389
I just didnt include outdated versions as those wount be very useful though (like 1.1b2),...
Anyway they still could be found here wich is also linked in my thread.
All i dont have in my thread for now is the different kernels (like sibere,.. v10,11,12,13) but I already was thinking about how to include this best
@ Lenn do u really think its useful "choosing" between em.
As far as i know (k I don't know much ) there is no reason to stick with an old urukdroid version at all (beside the dvb & cinemaplugin function are not yet inculed in 1.5 in a final stage)
@LeoNg628 perhaps u should rename it from [source] to [download] as i expected to fine the sources (source code) here
greetings
FrEcP
FrEcP said:
@ Lenn do u really think its useful "choosing" between em.
As far as i know (k I don't know much) there is no reason to stick with an old urukdroid version at all (beside the dvb function are not yet inculed in 1.5 in a final stage)
greetings
FrEcP
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh yes^^
Many new users cant use the update function, so they had have to install via the easyinstall method..
So they had to use Uruk1.0, but the RC1 of 1.5 is out, so they can use the newest version
I told around 10 peoples how to update from 1.0 to b2 or b3 of 1.5...
Lenn said:
Oh yes^^
Many new users cant use the update function, so they had have to install via the easyinstall method..
So they had to use Uruk1.0, but the RC1 of 1.5 is out, so they can use the newest version
I told around 10 peoples how to update from 1.0 to b2 or b3 of 1.5...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so it more like and "update howto" not and choosing of an old version like 1.1b2 - kk
Also wanted to give some hints for mutliboot - but i didn't try the alternativeOS option on my own yet sinc ei had no time for
Y - already thought about creating another thread in dev secion for an "howto urukdroid" - but i didn't do it yet since it's very unconfortable using such thing in a "thread". already thought about asking sauron for wiki permissions so we could creat such a thing there.
Anyway it shouldn't be that hard for ppl to read the last 3 pages of a thread and be up-to-date to know how to use a version - or starting from the download post where sauron posted the last version.
If they don't do things like here happen more often eventualy (dont take it serious ). DEV versions shouldn't be for lazy ppl tho? Well im not sure how 2 handle this atm.
But i still think a wiki like thing would be nice.
FrEcP said:
hey guys,
dont wanna backstab u - but most of the worrk already is in the stick thread I created some weeks ago:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1198389
I just didnt include outdated versions as those wount be very useful though (like 1.1b2),...
Anyway they still could be found here wich is also linked in my thread.
All i dont have in my thread for now is the different kernels (like sibere,.. v10,11,12,13) but I already was thinking about how to include this best
@ Lenn do u really think its useful "choosing" between em.
As far as i know (k I don't know much ) there is no reason to stick with an old urukdroid version at all (beside the dvb & cinemaplugin function are not yet inculed in 1.5 in a final stage)
@LeoNg628 perhaps u should rename it from [source] to [download] as i expected to fine the sources (source code) here
greetings
FrEcP
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure, may be you can copy those link from my thread, I'm never mind and welcome ^^
updated UD1.5 Release w/ OC
LeoNg628 said:
updated UD1.5 Release w/ OC
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Some questions about that I could not get an answer from $auron:
Can we use UrukDroid-1.5-kernelOC.tbz2 14-Aug-2011 18:32 5.2M after having installed UrukDroid_1.5-Install.rar 15-Aug-2011 22:53 147M?
I have doubt because the final 1.5 package is of later date. So is the kernel in the install package not newer than the OC package? Do I miss anything the final kernel in the package has if I install the older OC kernel??
Secondly, how does this $auron OC kernel compare to Sibere's OC kernel? Does $auron only do OC, no undervolting and no other tweaks?
Lastly... if the answers are positive... How do I install OC kernel on top of UD 1.5 exactly?
Thanks!!
If I was to try and port android ICS, would people be interested? And help me test it?
Im making no promise but I will try to do it.
Sent from my Dell Streak using XDA
hcaz301 said:
If I was to try and port android ICS, would people be interested? And help me test it?
Im making no promise but I will try to do it.
Sent from my Dell Streak using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi!Be sure that every DS 5 user will be appreciate to you and every one of us is ready to test it and donate you!
If you search the forum you can see that hPa was developing CM9 for DS 5 but his phone crashes under bus and he shared his development files in the forum.
And i think you can use CM9 for acer liquid s as a porting source because it almost has the same hardware with DS 5.
Big big big thanks!!!
sinan33 said:
Hi!Be sure that every DS 5 user will be appreciate to you and every one of us is ready to test it and donate you!
If you search the forum you can see that hPa was developing CM9 for DS 5 but his phone crashes under bus and he shared his development files in the forum.
And i think you can use CM9 for acer liquid s as a porting source because it almost has the same hardware with DS 5.
Big big big thanks!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yer I saw that, I am going to take a look at the pure ics files, and Ive made 2.2 work on my tablet so I think I might be able to, its worth a try
Sent from my dell streak XDA app
@hcaz_301 - Twitter
http://hcaz.me.uk/
any and all support will be happily provided... i have 2 DS5's ....
one that has a cracked screen , but luckily i can use droid explorer n screencast it on to my pc....
well it looks like I should try it, no promises though
Sent from my dell streak XDA app
@hcaz_301 - Twitter
http://hcaz.me.uk/
the main problem is to build the boot.img(kernel)
I compiled the ICS from source from Cyanogenmod9 N1(unofficial) source
replaced the proprietory drivers
but stuck on building kernel
if you could do this
we can release our first CM9_KANG_RCx(★★★★★)
world starts there
hPa said DSC kernel is enought to run ICS. You can try it.
Sent from my Dell Streak
tried but got stuck on bootlogo
Kolteabhiman said:
tried but got stuck on bootlogo
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you PM to nop about this topic?
Kolteabhiman said:
tried but got stuck on bootlogo
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It seems like you are almost there then? This is the ICS code you mentioned earlier right?
@Kolteabhiman: can you provide us with logcat ?
first thing to check - BOOTCLASSPATH in init.rc shoul be set to:
Code:
export BOOTCLASSPATH /system/framework/core.jar:/system/framework/core-junit.jar:/system/framework/bouncycastle.jar:/system/framework/ext.jar:/system/framework/framework.jar:/system/framework/android.policy.jar:/system/framework/services.jar:/system/framework/apache-xml.jar:/system/framework/filterfw.jar/filterfw.jar
also, mediafire j1d440p472atddp <- this boot.img is taken from nandriod image of my own aosp 4.0.4_r1 build that is able to boot to lockscreen (i've proviided some photos of it in this thread in Q&A forum)
I think I already said in my thread
That I dont have my PC for now (my father sealed it)
And also it wont be there for a month more(till I get admission to Comp science engg in good college)
:-(
Kolteabhiman said:
I think I already said in my thread
That I dont have my PC for now (my father sealed it)
And also it wont be there for a month more(till I get admission to Comp science engg in good college)
:-(
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Damn, your father is one tough man.
kibuuka said:
@Kolteabhiman: can you provide us with logcat ?
first thing to check - BOOTCLASSPATH in init.rc shoul be set to:
Code:
export BOOTCLASSPATH /system/framework/core.jar:/system/framework/core-junit.jar:/system/framework/bouncycastle.jar:/system/framework/ext.jar:/system/framework/framework.jar:/system/framework/android.policy.jar:/system/framework/services.jar:/system/framework/apache-xml.jar:/system/framework/filterfw.jar/filterfw.jar
also, mediafire j1d440p472atddp <- this boot.img is taken from nandriod image of my own aosp 4.0.4_r1 build that is able to boot to lockscreen (i've proviided some photos of it in this thread in Q&A forum)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So your very close to having it done then?
Fuys we need a modified amss and dsp for ICS to work
Like froyo to GB bht I think its too hard to reverse engg
And we need to modify the dsc kernel with hPA patches I am going for it as soon. As get my PC
Kolteabhiman said:
Fuys we need a modified amss and dsp for ICS to work
Like froyo to GB bht I think its too hard to reverse engg
And we need to modify the dsc kernel with hPA patches I am going for it as soon. As get my PC
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey then guys who made streak boot to ICS upto lockscreen
Have they used then kernel from then hPA cm0 dev files
Or any other
hcaz301 said:
So your very close to having it done then?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hope so
from what i've learned recently - disabled hw acceleration is caused by missing genlock support in kernel (it's required by adreno200 ics drivers, i believe). i've applied genlock enablement patch to dsc kernel sources, compiling it as i write this . if new kernel will give me working hw acceleration - i'll proceed to incorporating hpa's patches. fingers crossed
as of amss and dsp mods being required for ics to work - dunno yet. at least rild is working ok, according to logcat and signal strenght icon in statusbar and cell network name appearing on lockscreen.
Sorry for my noob question, I see our DS proc. and gpu similar with HTC HD2 and both use 2.6.35.xx kernel. HD2 can run ICS used the modified kernel from Tytung. They hv 2 version ICS, non hwa and full hwa, both can run smooth. Maybe we can use or modified the kernel for our DS.
I hv evo 4g running ICS, kernel Tiamat 2.6.38.xx. The rom is not too different from HTC HD2. ICS w/o hwa hv little lag but can reduce by using chainfire 3D to reduce the picture quality.
nom051205 said:
Sorry for my noob question, I see our DS proc. and gpu similar with HTC HD2 and both use 2.6.35.xx kernel. HD2 can run ICS used the modified kernel from Tytung. They hv 2 version ICS, non hwa and full hwa, both can run smooth. Maybe we can use or modified the kernel for our DS.
I hv evo 4g running ICS, kernel Tiamat 2.6.38.xx. The rom is not too different from HTC HD2. ICS w/o hwa hv little lag but can reduce by using chainfire 3D to reduce the picture quality.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
why we have proprietary drivers for then? just in case?
learned that tiamat kernel's genlock patch (they also have it included since feb'12) is somewhat different of what i've used to apply to dsc sources and produces rejects when applied. will look into this later.
EDIT: Correct. Currently i'm examining both kernels you've mentioned for kgsl-related stuff. It's is quite different from what we have in dell (read dsc phoenix kernel) sources. Errors i'm getting currently clearly indicate that kernel-side need to be updated for using ics drivers.
Hence, here goes kgsl backport mini-project. No clear ETA, but I'll try to do my best and finish it asap.
jamo59
Hello there!
Van időm, mert megkértem ezt Kolteabhiman Super-v0.3.120308-ROM linket MokeeOS u8800pro Sakura.zip-on használom. Azt hiszem, gyorsan én nem találtam benne hibát stabil! Tudom használni a szuper jó! Mindenkinek ajánlom, hogy próbálja ki! (A fórum megtalálható az összes ROM-ot próbáltam, de azt látom, hogy ez a legjobb!)
Data_ext4_formatter.zip rendben van, de sajnos nem tudom használni a biztonsági nandroid! Aztán amikor megpróbálja ROM lenne nagyon fontos, hogy ne kelljen újra telepíteni alkalmazásokat használom 91dB!
Ha valaki használta volna a véleményem Android kernel 04:03 2.6.35.14.DSC.TEAM.Phonix 985 hPaKick ROM ha jó tanácsot írás!
Elnézést a google fordító hibázott a hozzászólásomra!
Köszönöm!
Jamo59
the title says it all see if anyone can beat that screenshots below to anyone that dosent believe me rom+ kernel is
NXT GAMING+DX_Engine_Extreme (Beta)
extremetempz said:
the title says it all see if anyone can beat that screenshots below to anyone that dosent believe me rom+ kernel is
NXT GAMING+DX_Engine (Beta)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
THATS AWSOME!:good:
Whats your Benchmark and how much are you overclocking?
Wao is fantastic:laugh:
WTF!?!?!
Sent from my CyberDroid
How much stuff did you delete? Because the most I've gotten while it still being a working phone with gapps and everything is 310mb.
its not the rom its the kernel
extremetempz said:
its not the rom its the kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So is this a new kernel that is in "testing" and is not released yet? Because doing a search only brought up DiXperia ROM, so guessing DikeJ is working on a kernel, perhaps?
If this kernel is available can you be kind enough to post a link for it?
Edit - scratch that, the only thing I find is an X10 kernel... so going to venture DikeJ is working on porting it to our Xperia PLAY.. as I know he does work on teh X10 as well.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2345327
This says its a JB kernel, but is this a GB kernel as well?
I'm working on this kernel for DikeJ and his set of dixperia ROMs and I don't have any plans to upload it till DikeJ ask me to
edit: there will be a kernel for each android ROM DikeJ Makes this kernel is for dixperia perennial
Will the kernel work on r800x too?
chick3n564 said:
Will the kernel work on r800x too?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Possibly since its based on Lupus Kernel I should be able to work something out
That's awesome but when it's ready and dike j says you can upload do you think you can make two versions work one of them having als disabled. My phone als is broken so unless Als is disabled at kernel level it won't work. Sorry if it's too much to ask but if you can do that I'll be very grateful
Sent from my Xperia Play (r800x)
Could you be able to do this with ICS/JB kernels too?
Spatinator said:
Could you be able to do this with ICS/JB kernels too?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah I will you won't get 330 mb free ram though
Hail the King @extremetempz and @DiKeJ who are gonna build awesome Kernel + ROM for the R800x
But if you give the system, kernel etc. 420mbs of ram, there's only about 90mbs for the gpu/3d rendering(?) left. Wouldn't that cause lag in games?
Spatinator said:
But if you give the system, kernel etc. 420mbs of ram, there's only about 90mbs for the gpu/3d rendering(?) left. Wouldn't that cause lag in games?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The 90mb RAM is for the Kernel, not for GPU/3D Rendering - That is done using system RAM.
There will be 4 main Kernels from DXEngine:
-2 for X10 (GB and JB)
-2 for Play (GB and ICS/JB)
But it's not over, cause each main project will have other version with other destination - for example with some features disabled, but better in performance etc. etc. Justin (@extremetempz) is main Kernel Developer for my ROM projects so all credits goes to him - I focused on ROMs to make it best stable and settled with Kernels - trust me, it should do the job .
Spatinator said:
But if you give the system, kernel etc. 420mbs of ram, there's only about 90mbs for the gpu/3d rendering(?) left. Wouldn't that cause lag in games?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
games should actually run smoother because I've doubled the vram 4mb vs 8m
Edit: if anyone can extract lupus v12 ramdisk because it keeps Chucking errors at me please pm me asap as I need to extract to put the WiFi modules in and change a few things
well i have extracted it its using another format for ramdisk(bot the normal gzip)
i dont have the link i used to know how to extract but if you search a bit you will find it
(i dont have the extracted ramdisk because i have deleted my compiler machine from virtualbox)
DiKeJ said:
There will be 4 main Kernels from DXEngine:
-2 for X10 (GB and JB)
-2 for Play (GB and ICS/JB)
But it's not over, cause each main project will have other version with other destination - for example with some features disabled, but better in performance etc. etc. Justin (@extremetempz) is main Kernel Developer for my ROM projects so all credits goes to him - I focused on ROMs to make it best stable and settled with Kernels - trust me, it should do the job .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Awesome. Hey DikeJ I hope you and extremetempz dont me offering to beta test this kernel for you. I am on GB currently debloated stock on Lupus Kernel v12. Would love to test out this kernel if you wanted to have someone test it out. Either way I am excited to see this new kernel whether I beta test it or not.
Thank you both of you for your hard work and efforts to keep our little device humming along.