Related
CLARIFICATION: SamFirmware.com is NOT directly affiliated with Samsung Corp., but have links with them apparently (which explains how the ROMs leak).
Seen on Tweeter:
@SamFirmware
"Samsung: No Android 3.0 for Galaxy Tab."
http://twitter.com/#!/SamFirmware/status/55595012687282177
"today in meeting Samsung told me no 3.0 for Galaxy Tab. (Problem = Hardware.)"
http://twitter.com/#!/SamFirmware/status/55600489827549184
To put these statements in perspective:
http://androidandme.com/2010/09/news/galaxy-tab-qa-honeycomb-tablet-coming-next-year/
"The Samsung Galaxy Tab will launch with FroYo (Android 2.2) and eventually be upgraded to Gingerbread (maybe Android 3.0), but Samsung said Honeycomb was for a different kind of tablet experience."
“Moving forward with Honeycomb, that will be used in the next generation tablet as it is specifically optimized for different type of tablet, and will be used on another product only.”
it stinks samsung, samsung ever for me, any product that carries this brand will be part of my house !!!!!!!!!!
he not take care of their customers and it will lose one today! of that there is a 7-inch tab with another brand, I buy, preference for HTC !!!
thanks for this news, even if it is bad
Have they posted the source for this 'quote'? Probably not. Things like this shouldn't be believed until its official.
Sent from my HTC Desire using XDA App
I would take anything samfirmware takes with a pinch of salt. It was the same site that said Samsung IS updating to honeycomb not so long back.
Until Samsung themselves say anything ill wait.
daniel.weck said:
Seen on Tweeter:
"@SamFirmware: Samsung: No Android 3.0 for Galaxy Tab."
Sent from my GT-P1000 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Should have posted with source link. Otherwise.....
"@SamFirmware: Samsung: No Android 3.0 for Galaxy Tab but free ipads for tab owners."
Agreed! Lets wait for an official response but I'm pretty sure its true.
Ps-this has nothing to do with development do why did you put it in this section? We all need to do our part in cleaning & maintaining these threads.
Sent from my GT-P1000 using Tapatalk
These are the same people who have bricked more tabs than fixed.
I trust Samfirmwares as far as I can throw a fat kid. Bout 2 inches.
I dont see an abysmal difference between 2.2, 2.3 ... 3.0, everything works pretty much the same. the layout of 3.0 may not be the best for a 7inch tablet anyways... perhaps google will meet us halfway and release something that is not 3.0 but will run apps made for 3.0 or something like that. if we never get 3.0 its not going to be a big deal for me, maybe I am on a different situation because I just got it, and most of you have had it for while. and I could get the xoom if 3.0 was that big of a deal but I've played with the xoom and its just too big for me, I like the portability of the galaxy tab and that is more imporant that having honeycomb.
Honeycomb was the last reason to keep GTAB... now i will sell it and buy Kindle...
faust86 said:
Honeycomb was the last reason to keep GTAB... now i will sell it and buy Kindle...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How many devices are out there right now with ROMs on them that aren't official or haven't even been released?
Crummy reason to give up the best available tablet on the market today. (That's called an opinion, and I'm entitled to mine)
I'm fairly confident that at some stage we will have fully functional and stable honeycomb on our tabs. Does it really matter if it's not an official Samsung release?
After all, if all we're interested in is getting official updates from vendor sources then there's little or no point being on these forums.
Have faith in the developers here, in my opinion they provide more reliable roms than the vendors!
just one question, what the hell do you guys expect? if somebody port honeycomb to the tab we will have it. but whats the point? what you are actual missing on your tab? why need sooo much honeycomb? i guess in 95% of all cases its just the childish "must have" instinct like me....
so stay calm, lets enjoy our tab and stop to blame samsung....
I did quite trust the dev here, more than a samsung, but I am disappointed to have paid a very expensive tablet and end samsung not take care of customers, but many want our money !!!
I do not like their politics !!!
I trust samfirmware saying no honeycomb for the galaxy tab as much as I trust apple to tell me a quote from samsung[1]. wait for official sources to confirm or deny.
[1] referring to steve jobs displaying the misquote of samsung's ceo at the iPad2 event
abuser0815 said:
just one question, what the hell do you guys expect? if somebody port honeycomb to the tab we will have it. but whats the point? what you are actual missing on your tab? why need sooo much honeycomb? i guess in 95% of all cases its just the childish "must have" instinct like me....
so stay calm, lets enjoy our tab and stop to blame samsung....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe because some apps will only work on honeycomb.
Can anyone here honestly say that they bought there Tab because Samsung said that it would get Honeycomb? I don't recall Samsung ever officially saying anything of the sort personally, though I stand ready to be corrected!
Yes, it would be really nice to get an official Honeycomb ROM, but when I bought my Tab I knew it was coming with Froyo and I knew that Samsungs track record in the past with respect to new Android versions wasn't great.
If we get Gingerbread out of Samsung, I'd say that was a win personally.
Regards,
Dave
EDIT: Interesting article here dated September 2010, where Samsung effectively say that the Tab 7" wouldn't get Honeycomb.
HoneyComb IS here...
Hey guys its actually already been done. A russian developer already flashed it, and it works. ofcourse its an alfa version and there are tons of stuff that is not working, but that means in a few weeks and with all the smart people we have here, it will be done. Here is the link
http://www.max-up.ru/news-apple/android-30-honeycomb-galaxy-tab-gsm.html
Mohamed Sewidan
even htc flyer will be offered honeycomb.
http://www.carrypad.com/2011/04/06/...t-how-will-it-work-with-inking-and-htc-sense/
samsung has to do better to keep their customers.
msewidan said:
Hey guys its actually already been done. A russian developer already flashed it, and it works. ofcourse its an alfa version and there are tons of stuff that is not working, but that means in a few weeks and with all the smart people we have here, it will be done. Here is the link
http://www.max-up.ru/news-apple/android-30-honeycomb-galaxy-tab-gsm.html
Mohamed Sewidan
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Erhhh, you're coming a bit late to the party here!
a) This is based on the work of spacemoose1 from these forums for CDMA Tabs.
b) Many people here have flashed it or tried flashing it.
c) At best, it can be considered a very early alpha - it isn't in a state where you could remotely use it as a daily driver!
Regards,
Dave
foxmeister said:
Erhhh, you're coming a bit late to the party here!
a) This is based on the work of spacemoose1 from these forums for CDMA Tabs.
b) Many people here have flashed it or tried flashing it.
c) At best, it can be considered a very early alpha - it isn't in a state where you could remotely use it as a daily driver!
Regards,
Dave
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes I completely agree but that means that we have hope that the devs are going to work on it to make it work. So saying No honeycone is not accurate.
Also Here is the link from the tab general forum
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1023437
Hi Dears
I made a Petition in Petition online to Request from Samsung Co Ltd. for Release Honeycomb for Galaxy tab, If You agree with my Idea , Please go to Petition link and sign it
"Honeycomb for Every Galaxy Tab User"
Petition Link : http://www.petitiononline.com/13900322/petition.html
Best Regards
Erfan Shahmohamadi
I know some people in Samsung and i`ve worker with them and i`d like to tell you that Samsung dont give a f**k on consumer people, even the business one. They only care about $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ like al big companys but they are the 1st on ifnoring consumer delight.
It's a good idea, but it won't work. I read somewhere that Honeycomb wouldn't go to devices that shipped with FroYo. Think it was a statement from Google too.
| Don't Revive Me Bro | Follow me on Twatter
This petition is completley and utterly pointless. Its not upto Samsung or any other manufacturer if HC is released, Its up to google! Google isn't under any sort of legal obligation to release source at all. Its not like kernels where they are obliged to because of GPL.
So this petition isn't going to solve a damn thing.
The reason why HC has not been released is for one reason and one reason only and that's because they are trying to build a good and reliable range of HC Tablets. If they were to release the source you would get and endless amount of cheap/**** Chinese tablets that would dilute the product range and give a crappy impression on customers.
TheATHEiST said:
This petition is completley and utterly pointless. Its not upto Samsung or any other manufacturer if HC is released, Its up to google! Google isn't under any sort of legal obligation to release source at all. Its not like kernels where they are obliged to because of GPL.
So this petition isn't going to solve a damn thing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 .. agreed in every word you said ..
lets be logical .. HC for tab7.1 is ain't gonna happen , only Spacemoose1 can make this happen
Unless someone is going to pay for the development fees, Samsung would be dumb to invest time in this rather than on new product lines.
Timanator said:
Unless someone is going to pay for the development fees, Samsung would be dumb to invest time in this rather than on new product lines.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
IS NOT BY SAMSUNG IT"S BY GOOGLE >>>
fees the dev ? ? ? ?? ? spacemoose1 working on it and now we have 2.5 alpha . and she doesn't even ask for money ... unless if you like to donate her .... WTH ... ppl XDA dev are not asking your money before they build something for u . they build and its depend if you are kind or no to donate them ...
k0sh said:
IS NOT BY SAMSUNG IT"S BY GOOGLE >>>
fees the dev ? ? ? ?? ? spacemoose1 working on it and now we have 2.5 alpha . and she doesn't even ask for money ... unless if you like to donate her .... WTH ... ppl XDA dev are not asking your money before they build something for u . they build and its depend if you are kind or no to donate them ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dude, hes not talking about XDA "devs" hes talking about Samsung "devs"
Request to Samsung
Yes , You Right
But I would like Samsung before our friends in this forum to waste your precious time to do this, he proceeded to release versions for Galaxy tablet
i dont know, although it would have been great for both google and samsung to support HC on the SGT, i think id still prefer one built by the community. although there is more work involved it would still prove how far the community has come along, with people like spacemoose1 we can realy see the dedication to the coding they put behind their work.
dragonraelms said:
i dont know, although it would have been great for both google and samsung to support HC on the SGT, i think id still prefer one built by the community. although there is more work involved it would still prove how far the community has come along, with people like spacemoose1 we can realy see the dedication to the coding they put behind their work.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
how you expect from company that gave the update(gingerbread) first to SGS to give us Honeycomb ? ? they are treating the Heck Tab like a SGS ... and even less .. i believe they will not update the galaxy tab to honeycomb .. we are not going anywhere until next year probably , talking about the official update and not for honeycomb , i'm waiting spacemoose1 for the honeycomb , and ain't wait the google or samsung to provide us a silly update that gave to Galaxy S before to us ... i just p><ssed off
k0sh said:
how you expect from company that gave the update(gingerbread) first to SGS to give us Honeycomb ? ? they are treating the Heck Tab like a SGS ... and even less .. i believe they will not update the galaxy tab to honeycomb .. we are not going anywhere until next year probably , talking about the official update and not for honeycomb , i'm waiting spacemoose1 for the honeycomb , and ain't wait the google or samsung to provide us a silly update that gave to Galaxy S before to us ... i just p><ssed off
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no i agree with you there, we probaly wont see an offical update till 3.1 or something later comes out from google. personaly ive been using spacemoose1's gsm version of HC which so far runs nicely
There is power in numbers. Sadly, I don't think we have enough power. SGT is a great device tho. So glad that we have a booming a community and great developers.
The fact is, it needs to be pushed by Google to Samsung. Google *stated* that any tablet that originally shipped with FroYo wont get Honeycomb. As we know, the SGT came with FroYo, so no official Honeycomb for us. And a petition won't change that, reguardless of how many people we have.
| Don't Revive Me Bro | Follow me on Twatter
why needs "Honeycomb" ?
GB is fine so far!
cgigate said:
why needs "Honeycomb" ?
GB is fine so far!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because you always want what you can't have lol.
swyped from a galaxy far far away...
Straight up, they didn't release it as Euro and Asian Tabs can make phone calls and Honeycomb doesn't do phone calls. They are not going to split their market because some XDA users are pissed. Oh, and money.
slimdizzy said:
Straight up, they didn't release it as Euro and Asian Tabs can make phone calls and Honeycomb doesn't do phone calls. They are not going to split their market because some XDA users are pissed. Oh, and money.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Apparently the 8.9 tab can do.phone calls
swyped from a galaxy far far away...
the phone call thing is probably restricted by carrier.. not samsung
gl23leung said:
the phone call thing is probably restricted by carrier.. not samsung
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is for AT&T owners.... Thats why theres a thread dedicated to flashing a Euro rom so you CAN make phone calls....
Lucky us in Oz, our carrier aren't such A**holes... At least, not like that...
Guys,samsung is telling that g3 can't get GB(gingerbread) but as all you know cm7 is working for us (still in alpha stage)
but if we want official update we should Petition
if u want to join it on facebook
ask it to join this group-here the link---http://www.facebook.com/pages/Petition-for-GingerBread-firmware-for-Samsung-G3/222461904484097?ref=ts
and also plz like this page---http://www.facebook.com/groups/gbsg3/?notif_t=group_activity
we need minimum 2000 members
then people this time is for Petition GingerBread firmware for Samsung G3
plz join it if u want 2.3
<Mod Edit>
Additional information >
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=19024722&postcount=28
pvg777 said:
Guys,samsung is telling that g3 can't get GB(gingerbread) but as all you know cm7 is working for us (still in alpha stage)
but if we want official update we should Petition
if u want to join it on facebook
ask it to join this group-here the link---http://www.facebook.com/pages/Petition-for-GingerBread-firmware-for-Samsung-G3/222461904484097?ref=ts
and also plz like this page---http://www.facebook.com/groups/gbsg3/?notif_t=group_activity
we need minimum 2000 members
then people this time is for Petition GingerBread firmware for Samsung G3
plz join it if u want 2.3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If Samsung claim it's a lack of hardware in our phone, then why does the Galaxy 5 which is a pile of junk get it? I know: Samsung don't want the 'lower end' phone to beat the higher one...
Not again.....Don't you all grew tired of the petition thing already?.....
sent from my CM7 nokia 3210
hillbeast said:
If Samsung claim it's a lack of hardware in our phone, then why does the Galaxy 5 which is a pile of junk get it? I know: Samsung don't want the 'lower end' phone to beat the higher one...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Samsung is such a crap
Sent from my GT-I5800 using Tapatalk
hillbeast said:
If Samsung claim it's a lack of hardware in our phone, then why does the Galaxy 5 which is a pile of junk get it? I know: Samsung don't want the 'lower end' phone to beat the higher one...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ya but we will not give up this time is for telling Samsung that we want GB to G3
hillbeast said:
If Samsung claim it's a lack of hardware in our phone, then why does the Galaxy 5 which is a pile of junk get it? I know: Samsung don't want the 'lower end' phone to beat the higher one...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Been there, done that
Tapatalked
vivekmishra said:
Samsung is such a crap
Sent from my GT-I5800 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
we know samsung(samsuck) is crap but we want GB too so plz help us
Get over it. It's not gonna happen and samsung won't listen :/
we've spoken with Samsung and their answer was "there is no gingerbread upgrade planned for gt-i5800"
i think ive posted this answer a month ago in "General section" also Samfirmware not interested to port it either. They usually work with Samsung releases via Kies.
i still have the SG3 and im thinking to sell it
Samsung is soo gay man. :[email protected] Our phone does have the hardware. Those guys just don t want to give it. :-x
samsung are crappys......they r lazy....they r ****s.....coz.....actually the thing is they too might be knowing we g3 is capable of eating gbread but they are lazy to prepare 1 for it.....and a big thing is they do everything just for themselves i mean they think just of getting more money and not about the so called "welfare" and happiness of customers......when we'll spoil their name then they will come on track......
Yes yes. Efforts are required. There's no harm in giving it a shot. Right guys?
I completly agree with hillbeast.
They are making such claims because everything is marketing and profit. If you want gingerbread you'll have to buy another, more expensive, device.
Hardware can run it. One man army (marcellusbe) can make it (port it) but samsungs overpaid programmers can't...
i don't want gb...
i want ics (go marcellusbe please try)
Yes we also want ics
But samsung, if you think you'd not bother many people if their g3 won't get 2.3 or higher your wrong! I know allready 5 people with a g3 outside this forum while I just know 2 with a gs and 3 with a gs2...
No, ICS will be portable in 6 months when Google release the sources, but i think that ICS is crap. I want to have cm7.
serious, whats the "BIG" advantage of having gingerbread over froyo? what could we do with our g3 that we cant do know.
it's faster and i like updates but you're right.. ice cream sandwich is waaay cooler and i think it works faster..
<MOD EDIT>
XDA forbids advertising - for whatever reasons!
MODERATOR MESSAGE
Guys,
I have been following this thread. While it still looks like a civilised debate, i fear it may turn into an arguement soon.
Please let me be happy Keep it civilised. Dont curse - even if it is meant to be for Samsung!!! LOL
Samsung has said few days ago, that he would not update Galaxy S due to lack of memory for ICS and Touchwiz altogether. Today, there's a new info from our 'favourite' brand:
In spite of Samsung's best efforts to bury the news by reporting it a couple of days before Christmas, Friday's disclosure that the Galaxy S and Galaxy Tab won't get upgraded to Android 4.0 drew a lot of justified ire. Now the company seems to be backtracking like a champ, as reported by ajnews in Korea, by claiming that it will review the viability of updating those two devices in response to strong customer demand. While restating the difficulties of fitting its entire software footprint onto the Galaxy S and Tab's limited memory capacity, Samsung has been quoted as saying it'll investigate ways to try and make it work. We've reached out to Samsung for official comment on the matter and will update you as soon as we hear back.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
via TheVerge.
goorek said:
Samsung has said few days ago, that he would not update Galaxy S due to lack of memory for ICS and Touchwiz altogether. Today, there's a new info from our 'favourite' brand:
via TheVerge.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So? I dont care....theres will be more custom rom for it...
|Post from XDA premium app
|BroodRom RC2 Beta
|Instanet Free Access (no one believe its free)
good news ..!!! I hope we will get it.
i dont care either, samsung cant make a good smooth rom for galaxy s+ at all,
custom roms are always the best choice for us,
ics 4.0 will be ported to galaxy s+ sooner or later but one thing is clear, ported 4.0 especialy for galaxy s+ will be well optimized,smooth and fast and low memory issue will be solved
support our gr8 dev.team
regards
I know that, but for now on there isn't many custom roms for us. broodROM and Cranium, and the newest stock ones to flash. I appreciate their work, but they are based on the stock ones. and with ICS, that's a different thing to port it. and unfortuantely, I haven't seen much of a chance for the CyanogenMod or smth like this with ICS for our S+ yet. hope it will change.
c'mon guys. don't say u don't care. when samsung has decided not to release ICS for us you guys were complaining, now that samsung is reconsidering, you guys said i don't care?? yea right..
no matter we have custom rom or not, I would love to try out the official ICS.
and like the above mention, our dev is so poor that till this date there is so little choice of rom. how can u be so sure there would be ICS port for us? and if that didn't happen, u guys will be complaining again saying samsung is bad bla bla..
just be greatful jezz
I think it will be awesome!!
i saw only galaxy s and tab, why you are thinking that s+ is included into this list?
wlt said:
i saw only galaxy s and tab, why you are thinking that s+ is included into this list?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Galaxy s has few type of models, not only i9000..
Sent from my GT-I9001 using xda premium
they never mention anything about i9001, this phone is like forgotten, in both Samsung and devs world. I just hope that when they mention Galaxy S, they think also about S+.
well guys.
my opinion is a little bit splitted:
in the one hand, i have my phone since september and i read the forum carefully and at this time the forum was very dad, the wasn´t a root anyway!
in the other hand:
our phone is getting very big. here in europe it is selling very good, because you can buy it with the price of the i9000 and it is better then the i9000.
i think it will grow but it will take alot of time, maybe we will reach at march a respectable community....
but only maybe
if all goes wrong we will stuck on only to custom roms...
i think we have to drink our tea and just wait.....
sry for my perfect english
greetings fabsau
fabsau said:
well guys.
my opinion is a little bit splitted:
in the one hand, i have my phone since september and i read the forum carefully and at this time the forum was very dad, the wasn´t a root anyway!
in the other hand:
our phone is getting very big. here in europe it is selling very good, because you can buy it with the price of the i9000 and it is better then the i9000.
i think it will grow but it will take alot of time, maybe we will reach at march a respectable community....
but only maybe
if all goes wrong we will stuck on only to custom roms...
i think we have to drink our tea and just wait.....
sry for my perfect english
greetings fabsau
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
another non dev thread in the dev section.. nways, i heard the chinese community is big and that the I9001 is a very popular model there , and that they do a lot of developing on their own forums, hopefully that work will make it's way to xda sooner or later.
It shows that people much power is just great, but also continue to work hard.
This is great news!!!
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
ICS porting
I think we have no devs here that can do what others done....ICS porting.
We are the only ones that are not trying or we dont have any idea about porting.....It realy hurts me to see such websites saying all android devices have ICS and we dont.....OK here check this site and say what you have to say........ http://software2tech.com/2011/11/30/android-4-0-devices-list/
mbba67 said:
I think we have no devs here that can do what others done....ICS porting.
We are the only ones that are not trying or we dont have any idea about porting.....It realy hurts me to see such websites saying all android devices have ICS and we dont.....OK here check this site and say what you have to say........ http://software2tech.com/2011/11/30/android-4-0-devices-list/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
we can make use of other ports, like those from DHD/Xperia Arc S/I9000 , combining stuff from those 3 builds i'm pretty sure we can get a booting version with main things working. Devs from other devices have really done a lot, we just need some1 with the guts and basic knowledge to put things up together.
rayiskon said:
we can make use of other ports, like those from DHD/Xperia Arc S/I9000 , combining stuff from those 3 builds i'm pretty sure we can get a booting version with main things working. Devs from other devices have really done a lot, we just need some1 with the guts and basic knowledge to put things up together.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i belive there are few already
all we need is wait, the result will be here sooner or later,
on official list galaxy s+ i belive is on the bottom of samsung devices so our hope leading to gr8 developers here on xda.
regards
mbba67 said:
I think we have no devs here that can do what others done....ICS porting.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The main thing we are stuck is that this phone is totally forgotten. Except in China. No one is interested to develop anything for such piece of a device. There would be so useless number of users for those roms and mods.
mikeeo019 said:
The main thing we are stuck is that this phone is totally forgotten. Except in China. No one is interested to develop anything for such piece of a device. There would be so useless number of users for those roms and mods.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
how can we get those Chinese guys to xda then ?
rayiskon said:
how can we get those Chinese guys to xda then ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's a problem as most of them don't speak english. Not offended or anything Post based on my own experience.
---------- Post added at 02:09 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:49 AM ----------
I found something interesting on that Chinese I9001 forum. So it seems some students are trying to gather a group of developers. And the magical "4.0" seems to appear every now and then. Let's wait and see what will come The following text is not written by me. Google translator did the job.
"Here so long, no contribution has been in the water looking for fish Isle of Man, today, to drilled soil, that is to say that before in Saipan who worked with the community, did Moman's system, then go when, unexpectedly there confused the radical, then I heard, the day Moman inception, the hottest day, Oh, just get the points on the QQ stuff like that (because of bad mood, so hit wherever he goes, Oh, a joke) Now with my own 9001, so 4.0 Andrews also decided to get a working group, ad right Okay, we are using 4.0 and it was not previously Moman Nokia to lose, the community can be raised (of course from the master who does not open, right?) "
---------- Post added at 02:24 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:09 AM ----------
I found something interesting on that Chinese I9001 forum. So it seems some students are trying to gather a group of developers. And the magical "4.0" seems to appear every now and then. Let's wait and see what will come The following text is not written by me. Google translator did the job.
"Here so long, no contribution has been in the water looking for fish Isle of Man, today, to drilled soil, that is to say that before in Saipan who worked with the community, did Moman's system, then go when, unexpectedly there confused the radical, then I heard, the day Moman inception, the hottest day, Oh, just get the points on the QQ stuff like that (because of bad mood, so hit wherever he goes, Oh, a joke) Now with my own 9001, so 4.0 Andrews also decided to get a working group, ad right Okay, we are using 4.0 and it was not previously Moman Nokia to lose, the community can be raised (of course from the master who does not open, right?) "
---------- Post added at 02:25 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:24 AM ----------
Also found very interesting ROM made by the chinese http://translate.googleusercontent....1.html&usg=ALkJrhgrcANptLPgNgsL4x0zg0EJ6TYeew
As stated by GSMArena website there will be no Android 5.0 update for Galaxy S2 and obviously should apply to the variants too.
Although this news is leaked from the company's insider, it may be true. This news may be highly disappointing to many. Here's the link. Go ahead check it out.
http://www.gsmarena.com/galaxy_s_ii...roid_50_others_get_stuck_at_422-news-5720.php
Honestly, did anyone ever expect Android 5.0 to be officially released for our device?
dwie said:
Honestly, did anyone ever expect Android 5.0 to be officially released for our device?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No.. I'm still waiting for the premium pack for 4.1.2 although ! Multitask is not available yet
Thanks for making another thread to tell us. There was a shortage of them.
Extra kudos for linking to gsmarea, rather than the source.
oinkylicious said:
Thanks for making another thread to tell us. There was a shortage of them.
Extra kudos for linking to gsmarea, rather than the source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
M sorry but lot of people here dont know so I thought about this. And GSMArena was the source through which I got this news so thats why I linked it to the website. And this is the General section so I guess there is no rule not to link websites here for information. No offence.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium
gireeshtty9 said:
this is the General section so I guess there is no rule not to link websites here for information. No offence.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is a rule about searching before posting, however.
gireeshtty9 said:
M sorry but lot of people here dont know so I thought about this. And GSMArena was the source through which I got this news so thats why I linked it to the website. And this is the General section so I guess there is no rule not to link websites here for information. No offence.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Whaaaaat?! I thought you were being sarcastic in your first post!
What the hell is happening to xda these days.....
Edit: Nice. Two of the same threads from you!
3 major upgrades for a 2 year old phone still put Samsung as one of the better ones in terms of upgrades ...
jelly bean 4.2.2 is definitely the latest that i expected.
the s2 is too old but still good.
morover the most of us will get a new phone very soon because of the contracts.
and this phone will get android 5 or higher in the future.
Gonna upgrade to another manufacturer i think...since the uk galaxy s4 will be a snapdragon based model and not the octocore we were hoping for...key lime pie will be nice.
dudung0 said:
3 major upgrades for a 2 year old phone still put Samsung as one of the better ones in terms of upgrades ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Still not sufficient. A 650€ flagship should be supported more than 2 years and 2 poor versions. Ics & JB...
Or at least let the community do their job...
I totally agree, and don't understand the attitude of some people here... I didn't buy the phone just to replace it at the end of contract. It's still working perfect and I don't see the need for a replacement. Samsung should just let the community handle the updates if they are to lazy to do it themselves.
S2 till it dies, and when it does, another s2.
Fu*k it, I'll buy a couple s2 when they get 300 bucks cheap here (It's still at 600 bucks unbranded, 400 branded, crazy).
Sent from the little guy
we can have it by custom roms.
as expected from samsung, they only care about selling phone and now, if you want android 5 you need to buy and s4,,,shane on you samsung
AW: [News] No Android 5.0 upgrade for Galaxy S II
cyclonemax said:
as expected from samsung, they only care about selling phone and now, if you want android 5 you need to buy and s4,,,shane on you samsung
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dude they updated it from 2.3.6 up to 4.1.2 and they will update it to 4.2.2. Some Galaxy devices havent got any update. Just some bugfixes.
I hate samsung for that, but i love touchwiz and their hardware
Sent from my GT-I9001 using xda app-developers app
Donnie Sins said:
Whaaaaat?! I thought you were being sarcastic in your first post!
What the hell is happening to xda these days.....
Edit: Nice. Two of the same threads from you!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My post would be closed if its a nuisance over here. This is the General section and therz no problem if I post something usefull or worth knowing info. If you have problems you can PM mod to close this thread.
Sent from SGH-I777 running on the (Awesome)Captivating ROM (X4) by Sepphi.
Ok, chill out now, no need to get sentimental.
I really wanna see 5.0 and what it's all about, I'm somewhat skeptical on the gigant upgrade that would represent against JB.
If a couple of devs make it work with no issues on their ROMs I don't see why we can't lobby up and ask for that update.
I mean, samsung devs vs xda devs...I'm sticking with our troops.
One thing's for sure, if the galaxy nexus gets it, I'll burn tires right in front of Samsung.
Sent from the little guy
gireeshtty9 said:
As stated by GSMArena website there will be no Android 5.0 update for Galaxy S2 and obviously should apply to the variants too.
Although this news is leaked from the company's insider, it may be true. This news may be highly disappointing to many. Here's the link. Go ahead check it out.
http://www.gsmarena.com/galaxy_s_ii...roid_50_others_get_stuck_at_422-news-5720.php
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that's too bad..
Yes, if Samsung would now release all the sources (required by the license) we could keep upgrading our devices on our own. The S2 community has done a fabulous job, and we would get some disaffected devs back if we had all the sources. This is still a great phone. I'd hazard to say that there aren't many (any?) other 2 year old phones that still run this well on the "latest" software. I agree it might be still going strong in 4 years. Due to Samsung's intransigence however I think my next has to be Nexus. But it's hard to justify giving this up. Despite a faded screen, and reduced capacity of the battery, it still screams smoothly!