There's any h/w difference in camera btw X10 and Incredible s ? .. Both are a good 8 MP camera sensors but the photos shot with Incredible S are a lot crisp , clear and snappier , almost like shot with Digi Cam. What's the big difference ? ... Can our Devs for X10 improve photos quality ?
n4naveen said:
There's any h/w difference in camera btw X10 and Incredible s ? ..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure there is h/w difference. They are two different phones hardware-wise.
n4naveen said:
Both are a good 8 MP camera sensors but the photos shot with Incredible S are a lot crisp , clear and snappier , almost like shot with Digi Cam. What's the big difference ? ... Can our Devs for X10 improve photos quality ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you tried comparing photos on your PC instead of the phones' displays?
Because the IncS has an AMOLED display, if I am not mistaken, thus the colors
should be more vibrant and the images sharper.
My_Immortal said:
Sure there is h/w difference. They are two different phones hardware-wise.
Have you tried comparing photos on your PC instead of the phones' displays?
Because the IncS has an AMOLED display, if I am not mistaken, thus the colors
should be more vibrant and the images sharper.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1. Also, x10 runs on 60k color =/ and i believe increS has 16 mil on it.
n4naveen said:
There's any h/w difference in camera btw X10 and Incredible s ? .. Both are a good 8 MP camera sensors but the photos shot with Incredible S are a lot crisp , clear and snappier , almost like shot with Digi Cam. What's the big difference ? ... Can our Devs for X10 improve photos quality ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My friend, the X10 camera is more than sufficient enough to get day to day great quality pics.
Learn the camera is the first thing you should do....experiment with it.
Sent from my X10 using XDA App
My_Immortal said:
Sure there is h/w difference. They are two different phones hardware-wise.
Have you tried comparing photos on your PC instead of the phones' displays?
Because the IncS has an AMOLED display, if I am not mistaken, thus the colors
should be more vibrant and the images sharper.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Alright , I attached some pics taken from X10 and Incredible S , but won't mention which one is taken from which mobile ... You just try to pick the best ones in terms of clarity n crispness ... I will reveal the answer once u are done .. btw IncS has Clear LCD display .. and it seems that incS display is the best of all HTCs ..
photo1 ----
photo2 ----
photo3 ----
photo4 ----
^umm no way...incS is a great phone but evolution 3d and sensation are better HTC phones
Sent from my X10 using XDA App
Yep, X10 camera damn good. But in dark you won't able to capture lol
OMG!! Jaipur!!
X10 camera is only capable to focus properly using cyanogen camera app or vignette. Stock app really fails to focus promptly..
And yes, our camera sensor sucks for taking night shots, its not about how many mp at all
Sent from my SO-01C using XDA App
photos 1 n 2 are shot with Inc S
photos 3 n 4 are shot with X10
the difference is pretty obvious, isn't it ? .. 1 n 2 are very crisp !
n4naveen said:
photos 1 n 2 are shot with Inc S
photos 3 n 4 are shot with X10
the difference is pretty obvious, isn't it ? .. 1 n 2 are very crisp !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
try capturing same photo with both the devices!
xtbk9999 said:
X10 camera is only capable to focus properly using cyanogen camera app or vignette. Stock app really fails to focus promptly..
And yes, our camera sensor sucks for taking night shots, its not about how many mp at all
Sent from my SO-01C using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I honestly experience just the oposite, getting better shots with stock cam, although vignette is great for filters and effects.
Sent from my X10i using XDA Premium App
Hey, I see what you are trying to say but you can't say it's a fair comparison if you don't take the same shot from both cameras...then we can really see the differences.
Your Jaipur-ish building picture honestly doesn't look great, even with the X10, it's too pixelated...my X10 takes much better shots than that in similar light.
to do a fair n honest comparin
the same pics has to b taken with both phones
its hard to say as the pics are all diff
Related
hey..
my friend has a SE satio which comes with a 12MP camera..
i just thought my photos sucked when taken at night because it's dark outside..
but when my friend took the same photos in same setting with her satio, it looked so much better..
i don't think 4MP would make such difference .. would it??
x10 came out after satio.. but i guess they put a crappier camera on x10.. hm..
So what you got Android
Considering most phones don't even break 4MP 8.1MP is quite a good camera for a cell phone. SE has been beastly with cameras in their phones and those 4MP do matter. if you took a picture with a 4MP camera and compared it to a picture taken with the X10, the X10 would look infinitely better.
Phone's rarely do well with lighting because they have fixed focus lenses, it's not practical to have a lense that extends and retracts on a cell phone. Cell phones are getting better and better camera but they will never be able to replace a good professional camera.
As for the decision to give the X10 an 8.1MP camera, it likely had to do with pricing. if SE would have put a 12MP camera in the price would have been much higher.
oh no.. i don't mean "i want a 12MP camera!"
but just i didn't think 'megapixels' made much difference in qualities when taken in dark...
it's just that when i took photos with the satio, we could see ppl's faces and etc.. but with x10 it was really dark, pixelated, and etc....
The Satio also has a xenon flash. I'd expect my C905 to beat out my X10 at night too.
lft4ded said:
The Satio also has a xenon flash. I'd expect my C905 to beat out my X10 at night too.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1! i loved the flash on my c905! it was awesome - infact sometimes too good. it would light up dust in the air and they would appear on shot
The amount of megapixels have nothing to do with the quality of the colors and how well it does in bad lit scenes. If you limit the amount of layers the light has to pass to get to the converting(light to electricity) layer of the cmos sensor then you get better results in dark settings.
Sony developed a back lit sensor in 2008 (i think). This sensor is lit from the back and the light doesn't have to pass all the layers. The result of this is it catches more light. And then you can take better pictures at night. Not sure if they have implemented it yet into mobile phones.
A xenon flash helps idd. Are the pictures in the dark also better without flash?
The x10's camera can capture colors very well with fine detail, it's not a bad camera.
Satio wins at night hands down (xenon flash ).
I saw images in day light and they were better compared with X10.
Problem with Satio is the software.
At least X10 got firmware updates for bug fixing but Satio is pretty much dead.
4 mp matters when it comes to Cypershot processor and Xenon Flash in Satio
even thought Pixels have nothing to do with quality but only in size of the picture
xperia x10 camera quality lacks
sony Ericsson want to sell his all mobile phones thats why there is no camera quality in x10..company never introduce all rounder phone which has good camera , android 2.1 (at least 2.1) , wifi , gps , 4inch screen , sexy look..
if such phone any company introduce than his other handset will not sold..
its marketing policy...nothing else...
swapniladsure said:
sony Ericsson want to sell his all mobile phones thats why there is no camera quality in x10..company never introduce all rounder phone which has good camera , android 2.1 (at least 2.1) , wifi , gps , 4inch screen , sexy look..
if such phone any company introduce than his other handset will not sold..
its marketing policy...nothing else...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What are you talking about? The X10 had the absolute best camera on a smartphone when it was released.
Also, megapixels mean absolutely, positively nothing when it comes to image capture in the dark. In fact, the more megapixels you shove into a tiny sensor, the crappier the image will be. A bigger CMOS sensor will give you a better picture, not more megapixels.
Exactly
Take a look at the pictures posted here : http://www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=195111&start=210
They are taken with a xperia x10 and they look stunning compared to other phones.
Infinity1988 said:
Exactly
Take a look at the pictures posted here : http://www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=195111&start=210
They are taken with a xperia x10 and they look stunning compared to other phones.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, but not compared to Satio
and you can see that in the link you provided
MJ_QaT said:
Yes, but not compared to Satio
and you can see that in the link you provided
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't come across any comparison between the satio and the xperia x10 on that url, maby i overlooked it. But there are people there that switched from the satio to the x10 and are happy with it. That thread is for x10 pictures only.
Besides take a look here : http://www.ephotozine.com/article/Sony-Ericsson-Satio-12471 Those pictures don't look better than the pictures of the x10.
I think the only thing that's better on the satio (besides amount of mp) is the xenon flash.
I would like to see a direct comparison between the satio, c902 and x10.
not only photo taking sux... music oso sux...
SE never improvise the technology of cybershot and walkman to X10...
wat's the point trying to come out a high end phone but lack of all these... sux... even my brother lousy W350i tat have much much nicer music than mine...
shame on SE....
Infinity1988 said:
I didn't come across any comparison between the satio and the xperia x10 on that url, maby i overlooked it. But there are people there that switched from the satio to the x10 and are happy with it. That thread is for x10 pictures only.
Besides take a look here : http://www.ephotozine.com/article/Sony-Ericsson-Satio-12471 Those pictures don't look better than the pictures of the x10.
I think the only thing that's better on the satio (besides amount of mp) is the xenon flash.
I would like to see a direct comparison between the satio, c902 and x10.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not saying that x10 picture quality is not good, I am happy with it :-D
But I used both cameras and excluding the mp difference satio's photos are better due to cypershot technology. However, using 3rd party applications like vignette in x10 makes its photos much better and more professional ;-)
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
MJ_QaT said:
I'm not saying that x10 picture quality is not good, I am happy with it :-D
But I used both cameras and excluding the mp difference satio's photos are better due to cypershot technology. However, using 3rd party applications like vignette in x10 makes its photos much better and more professional ;-)
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree on that. The stock camera application uses too much compression. They don't finetune the software of the camera like with the cybershot phones.
Hello people
We have a wonderful 8 megapixel camera and if used properly we can get really amazing shots.
Lets discuss some tips and tricks we use to make the result even better.
Oh we have? I thought you said that android native camera app is much easier, better and faster to use? And now you make a thread for tips and tricks?
Why not give us a link of the android camera app. Its much easier dont you think?
Sent from my X10i using XDA Premium App
I just flashed from 2.1 to 2.2 (wolfbreak's rom)
Any tips and tricks for that?
when taking pic which is less than 10 CM we use macro,but does anyone has a idea how to take a similar pic like a portrait where only the person is focussed rest is blurred ,something like DSLR takes!!
My tip is to use the new HD1080 mode.... Seriously my pics since the last camera update have been incredible. Better than my digital camera by far.
kunalgahlot said:
when taking pic which is less than 10 CM we use macro,but does anyone has a idea how to take a similar pic like a portrait where only the person is focussed rest is blurred ,something like DSLR takes!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah I would also like to knew that
Sent from my X10i using XDA Premium App
kunalgahlot said:
when taking pic which is less than 10 CM we use macro,but does anyone has a idea how to take a similar pic like a portrait where only the person is focussed rest is blurred ,something like DSLR takes!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
just click on the screen where is that person is stand.
if its work click thanks button
Hussain Isa said:
just click on the screen where is that person is stand.
if its work click thanks button
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
does that work for Xperia too,its looks like a feature in Iphone...i know that multi auto focus...but i don't know if we can focus by click on a particular spot on screen..!!
or can we
i've 3 ROM in my SD,
First : CM7RC2v012 for all days
Second : 2.1.A.0.435 Generic for photos
Last : TripNMiUI 0.2.9) for tests
i dont flash the baseband ; just "backup/restore" with xRecovery.
Exemple of photos with my x10i :
fiscidtox said:
My tip is to use the new HD1080 mode.... Seriously my pics since the last camera update have been incredible. Better than my digital camera by far.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've tried the HD1080 mode, and I still find it worse than vignette, nothing beats vignette in my opinion, except that its so slow.
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
Even with stock camera,what are the best settings to get amazing pictures...like some tweaks in normal settings...
Does anyone find difference between single autofocus and multi autofocus!!
i make my photo with this settings
- macro
- 8M
- very-high quality
other in "auto"
What is hd1080 mode guys?
Sent from my X10i
Nigeriax10holland said:
What is hd1080 mode guys?
Sent from my X10i
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's widescreen, and the pics are amazing quality.
Ever since the new camera upgrade for 2.2 it's been a new selection. I find it fantastic
fiscidtox said:
It's widescreen, and the pics are amazing quality.
Ever since the new camera upgrade for 2.2 it's been a new selection. I find it fantastic
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wasnt it available in stock rom, wvga or something?
Sent from my X10i
blondprod said:
i've 3 ROM in my SD,
First : CM7RC2v012 for all days
Second : 2.1.A.0.435 Generic for photos
Last : TripNMiUI 0.2.9) for tests
i dont flash the baseband ; just "backup/restore" with xRecovery.
Exemple of photos with my x10i :
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow how did you get such vibrant colors? I am using stock 2.1 (435) rom and all my greens and yellows are washed out - i get a bluish tinted image....tinkering with white balance does no good either
fiscidtox said:
It's widescreen, and the pics are amazing quality.
Ever since the new camera upgrade for 2.2 it's been a new selection. I find it fantastic
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dude, all it is is wide screen. The quality is even lower than the 6mp wide mode.
Trust me, look at the compression on that mode.
Stick with 8mp mode
Sent from my X10a using XDA App
Mr Patchy Patch said:
Dude, all it is is wide screen. The quality is even lower than the 6mp wide mode.
Trust me, look at the compression on that mode.
Stick with 8mp mode
Sent from my X10a using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well my pics look way better in 1080 mode, so much that I've been getting comments on how good they are. The focus on the 8mp has been terrible, pics look pretty bad. I compared modes and the 1080hd is much better
fiscidtox said:
Well my pics look way better in 1080 mode, so much that I've been getting comments on how good they are. The focus on the 8mp has been terrible, pics look pretty bad. I compared modes and the 1080hd is much better
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, now your making me wanna check this again. I really didn't put alot of time in it. Im gonna compare that against vignette 16:9 mode which is outstanding.
Sent from my X10a using XDA App
bbsrailfan said:
Wow how did you get such vibrant colors? I am using stock 2.1 (435) rom and all my greens and yellows are washed out - i get a bluish tinted image....tinkering with white balance does no good either
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
photo make with big sunshine @ south of france
(sorry my english)
I already sold my X10i, and I would like to share some pictures I captured using X10i earlier, they are not professional, but they are much better then Neo V cam (which is 5MP), Now I am thinking about Neo which also have 8MP Cam, but if its better ?
https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.10150430328547952.415528.780557951&type=3
what camera settings did ya use sick pics
looking good
nice pictures bro!
huzi7868 said:
what camera settings did ya use sick pics
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just used Landscape mode, focus infinity and no stabilizing, nothing special !
Matthyzz said:
nice pictures bro!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks
zmbutt said:
focus infinity and no stabilizing, nothing special
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah, those settings are the best, overall i like the photos taken with my x10 but wish it had better lens though.
My old Olympus camera produced some stunning pictures even at a meager 3 megapixel because it packed Carl Zeiss lens. the most tempting thing for me about the Nokia lumia 900 is it's Carl Zeiss camera.
some pics taken from my x10, the second one with Panorama beta, the others with stock and miui camera.
a.monteiro said:
some pics taken from my x10, the second one with Panorama beta, the others with stock and miui camera.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good novice level !
Here are some from me, these are showing focused pics. And lol at third one xD
All are at 6MP 16:9 widescreen, Single Auto-focus.
PlantFocus1
Plantfocus2
Playing BF3lolwut
I'm gonna try that Infinity focus and no image stabilizing.
I think , only difference neo camera in low light condition taken photo , other stiuation X10 beats ... Here is some examples
ItBankRock said:
Here are some from me, these are showing focused pics. And lol at third one xD
All are at 6MP 16:9 widescreen, Single Auto-focus.
PlantFocus1
Plantfocus2
Playing BF3lolwut
I'm gonna try that Infinity focus and no image stabilizing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that's Impressive
mundy725 said:
I think , only difference neo camera in low light condition taken photo , other stiuation X10 beats ... Here is some examples
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you mean by Neo V, yea disappointed ...
zmbutt said:
you mean by Neo V, yea disappointed ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, i used Neo camera , and compare it with x10 in my opinion, only in low light condition neo camera is much better take photos, in light condition , x10 much better , no difference , abt neo v , i didnt used that but , xperia mini i used, it is also 5 mp camera , comparing with other 5mp cameras it takes nice photos , but in details not so deeply, only generally takes ... via taken photos sometimes i used lens , some macro or other ... size of photos increase up stock kamera 4 -4.5 mb sometimes , in vignnette app, it 2x more , up to 8 mb ... i looking a way to increase video bitrate also , max is 49.5 mb per minute
I see, I thought Neo might have good camera than X10 well that's more disappointing, I was thinking about to buy Neo ! huh.
zmbutt said:
I see, I thought Neo might have good camera than X10 well that's more disappointing, I was thinking about to buy Neo ! huh.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, there some things , i also disappointing , if SE use same Exmor R camera in Neo and Xperia Ray , why only ARC and ARC S win cameraphone 2011-2012 ? Also in here Neo is cheaper than X10 difference btw them about over 60 dollar. in price ...
I am interested in both these phones and am having trouble deciding due to the various camera reviews.
I am specifically interested in how each camera handles moving objects like kids or pets running as this is what I take most pics of.
Please post any samples here. Thanks kindly.
Edit - please don't post any YouTube links. I have watched every video comparing the two. Real world results are much better for everyone here.
Sent from my HTC One X+ using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
ipmanwck said:
I am interested in both these phones and am having trouble deciding due to the various camera reviews.
I am specifically interested in how each camera handles moving objects like kids or pets running as this is what I take most pics of.
Please post any samples here. Thanks kindly.
Sent from my HTC One X+ using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't have the Z2, but I had the Z1 and it was by far the worst camera I had used on any phone. All the pics had a huge amount of noise and tended to look painted. When the Kit Kat update came and there was no improvement I moved on from the Z1. Seeing as the Z1 and Z2 have the same camera I imagine it's the same situation with the Z2.
The G3 camera is at the opposite end of the spectrum and delivers the best still shots I have seen on a phone, certainly comparable to a dedicated camera. Absolutely no regrets moving on from the Z1 or M8 to this phone.
http://www.phonearena.com/reviews/LG-G3-vs-Sony-Xperia-Z2_id3727/page/3
z2 camera
I have to say I have a z2 and it is by far the BEST camera I have ever used in a smart phone. -MOD EDIT- and no swearing please.It has been rated the best camera on the market over the I phone. And where the person said the pictures looked painted it's because the pictures are really that clear. They are so crystal clear that they don't look real. I had an s4 which was a 13 mp camera which was very good but this z2 in auto mode which is only 8mp and it takes beautiful pictures. And yes the comparison where it won was compared in 8mp mode so the playing field was even. You can shoot in 15.5 and 20.7 mp modes and it shoots amazing motion pictures. I take lots of pictures of my dogs playing and running and jumping and there is no noise and blows away the htc one m8 and the galaxy s5.I don't think the g3 could possibly take better pictures. I haven't used one because it's not available but trust me sony makes absolutely amazing phone cameras. They probably made the ones on the g3 and s5.but the z2s is a higher megapixel. And it's on a Sony product.
I hope the Z2 is way better than Z1, because Z1 is just an ok cam.
Sent from a mobile Gadget...
mit3283 said:
The person who said it is the worst camera ever is an idiot. They are so crystal clear that they don't look real.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually I said the Z1 was the worst phone camera I had used as it had a lot of artifacting and noise. I can imagine there might have been some improvement with the Z2. Heck I was taking better pictures with the M8 than with my Z1.
This is not my opinion alone, take a look at some of the earlier posts in the Z1 picture thread.
In any event the G3 has a really good camera that I enjoy. YMMV.
I'm in the same boat. I'm choosing between the G3 and Z2, and camera is the most important thing for me since I take a lot of pics of my 3 kids, so particularly picture of moving object.
I did a lot of reading on G3 vs. Z2 and their camera. This one seems to have the most details:
http://www.phonearena.com/reviews/C...one-5s-LG-G2-Sony-Xperia-Z2-HTC-One-M8_id3728
In this review G3 did very well, best in 2 of the 3 main categories (detail and indoor), and best in 3 of the 4 minor categories (Panorama, HDR, and night). However it didn't talk much about picture of moving objects. I'd appreciate input on specifically this.
mit3283 said:
I have to say I have a z2 and it is by far the BEST camera I have ever used in a smart phone. -MOD EDIT- and no swearing please.It has been rated the best camera on the market over the I phone. And where the person said the pictures looked painted it's because the pictures are really that clear. They are so crystal clear that they don't look real. I had an s4 which was a 13 mp camera which was very good but this z2 in auto mode which is only 8mp and it takes beautiful pictures. And yes the comparison where it won was compared in 8mp mode so the playing field was even. You can shoot in 15.5 and 20.7 mp modes and it shoots amazing motion pictures. I take lots of pictures of my dogs playing and running and jumping and there is no noise and blows away the htc one m8 and the galaxy s5.I don't think the g3 could possibly take better pictures. I haven't used one because it's not available but trust me sony makes absolutely amazing phone cameras. They probably made the ones on the g3 and s5.but the z2s is a higher megapixel. And it's on a Sony product.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is the kind of feedback we are after in here. Thanks so much for the info. Could you please post some pics here of your moving pets in 8mp superior mode that would be really helpful. Thanks again.
Sent from my HTC One X+ using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Any smartphone is going to struggle when taking shots of moving objects. That's simply due to the size of the sensor and how fast the lens operates.
A good test is to get someone to stand still in front of the lens and take a shot whilst they are waving back at you.
A decent digital camera with a good fast lens will keep both the person and their waving hand clear and sharp.
A blur free shot will require a fast shutter, something a smartphone struggles to achieve in anything other than bright and clear lighting.
Beards said:
Any smartphone is going to struggle when taking shots of moving objects. That's simply due to the size of the sensor and how fast the lens operates.
A good test is to get someone to stand still in front of the lens and take a shot whilst they are waving back at you.
A decent digital camera with a good fast lens will keep both the person and their waving hand clear and sharp.
A blur free shot will require a fast shutter, something a smartphone struggles to achieve in anything other than bright and clear lighting.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the info but as the title states I just want real world comparisons. Some mobiles capture .motion much better than others and due to the bigger sensor was hoping z2 would do well but jury is still out until further pics are posted.
Sent from my HTC One X+ using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
ipmanwck said:
Thanks for the info but as the title states I just want real world comparisons. Some mobiles capture .motion much better than others and due to the bigger sensor was hoping z2 would do well but jury is still out until further pics are posted.
Sent from my HTC One X+ using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No problem.
To part answer your request, the Sony Z2 has a slightly larger sensor at 1/2.3" over the LG G3 1/3".
So, based on sensor size alone the Z2 wins this.
However, sensor size alone won't guarantee a better shot and this is where LG needs to up its stakes.
Will it do it..... Well I currently have a Z2 which is miles better than the Z1 I previously had.
Unfortunately, even with it's larger sensor it fails to capture a steady and clear blur free shot. A moving hand is just a blur.
Sorry I do not have any shots at hand to show this. For shots of say my grandchildren running around as if they are all driving formula one cars I always go straight to one of my fast digital cameras. Not even a dedicated small compact digital camera will take a blur free shot.
I'll be getting a UK LG G3 in the next couple of weeks and it will be a great phone.
I'll use it for many tasks including photos but I won't expect it to capture any blur free shots.
But to sum up your question...... Of the two my money would go to the G3. It may not be able to achieve what you are asking but what with OIS hardware and that Laser focus they will help photos to be much clearer where lighting is not ideal.
for me, with moving objects most of the times i don't go the picture route. i go to camera, scroll down that button on upper right to switch to video mode.
The only phone that can take less blurry pics is m7 and m8, that was the point. Shutter speed is a bit higher. I have tried all the ones in my signature at the same target, my kids ☺
Sent from a mobile Gadget...
dondavis007 said:
The only phone that can take less blurry pics is m7 and m8, that was the point. Shutter speed is a bit higher. I have tried all the ones in my signature at the same target, my kids ☺
Sent from a mobile Gadget...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I had 3 x M7s all had the purple tint issue due to poor heat shielding and the camera was rubbish. HTC thought it would be a good idea to use the same camera in the m8 !! It still blurred in indoor motion shots and really the camera is not good from experience. Thanks for the opinion though but lets stick to the mentioned handsets.
Sent from my HTC One X+ using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
ipmanwck said:
I had 3 x M7s all had the purple tint issue due to poor heat shielding and the camera was rubbish. HTC thought it would be a good idea to use the same camera in the m8 !! It still blurred in indoor motion shots and really the camera is not good from experience. Thanks for the opinion though but lets stick to the mentioned handsets.
Sent from my HTC One X+ using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're holding it wrong [emoji1]. The word a bit doesn't make it a dslr. Out of my sig those is the best for motion blur, nothing else.
You went back to the HOX?
Sent from a mobile Gadget...
dondavis007 said:
You're holding it wrong [emoji1]. The word a bit doesn't make it a dslr. Out of my sig those is the best for motion blur, nothing else.
You went back to the HOX?
Sent from a mobile Gadget...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is a temporary phone. Got it off eBay for 100. One x +. Had the s4 for a while after the m7 fiasco ! Not getting into the HTC camera issues here as this is not the forum for it but if your happy with your HTC phone camera then that's good but why are you here then ? If you have a z2 please post pics.
Sent from my HTC One X+ using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
I'm sorry but the Xperia Z2 appears to be far superior to the G3 in everything but focus time or when the LED is used.
Since 4.4.2 and the latest camera app, the Sony is finally taking the photos it was always meant to. Even auto mode is now good, which is saying something.
But there's obviously more to the G3 than just the camera.
I have never used a z2 but z1 compact was absolutely awful. Even with the lack of mega pixels i am very impressed with the g3 camera i am going to do a lumia 1020 vs g3 thread tomorrow. I think you will be suprised how good the g3 camera is.
mit3283 said:
I have to say I have a z2 and it is by far the BEST camera I have ever used in a smart phone. -MOD EDIT- and no swearing please.It has been rated the best camera on the market over the I phone. And where the person said the pictures looked painted it's because the pictures are really that clear. They are so crystal clear that they don't look real. I had an s4 which was a 13 mp camera which was very good but this z2 in auto mode which is only 8mp and it takes beautiful pictures. And yes the comparison where it won was compared in 8mp mode so the playing field was even. You can shoot in 15.5 and 20.7 mp modes and it shoots amazing motion pictures. I take lots of pictures of my dogs playing and running and jumping and there is no noise and blows away the htc one m8 and the galaxy s5.I don't think the g3 could possibly take better pictures. I haven't used one because it's not available but trust me sony makes absolutely amazing phone cameras. They probably made the ones on the g3 and s5.but the z2s is a higher megapixel. And it's on a Sony product.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
does it still overheat? i had the z2 and that was the only thing that i didnt like about it
lg g3 is better
ahaha
Hey everyone.
Today I searched in store some kind of camera app with macro focus feature (too bad Sony Camera lacks this.)
So I came across Camera FV-5. Nice interface, but still a Sony UI fan. Anyway, besides the macro focus, under Settings I found the option to save pictures as .PNG.
I knew it has a better compression, almost lossless, compared to the common and easy-to-process .JPEG, so I took one photo outside (ISO 50, AutoFocus, a bit lowered exposure) and one indoor (without flash, yellow/orange 60W lightbulb as source of light in the room, same settings as above.)
I was pretty impressed by the quality. It takes some time to process the image fully, Album firstly doesn't even recognize the photo as existent. Afterwards, it takes ages to load the cache when double-tap zoom.
Anyway, see how nice, crisp and clear photos our phones can take - with absolute no post-editing.
Taken with Z3 Compact with Cyberian Camera MOD.
BTW, the files are huge. One is 21.7 MB and the other over 25. That means 1 pixel is over 1 byte. Cool.
OUTSIDE VIEW
INSIDE ENERGY BAR
Wow - that shot of the candy bar is VERY impressive. Too bad the file size is so ridiculously large. Can you show us the same picture taken using the Sony Superior Auto Mode (8MP)?
PuffDaddy_d said:
Can you show us the same picture taken using the Sony Superior Auto Mode (8MP)?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've attached 8MP and 20 MP versions, Superior Auto Mode.
And thanks to Cyberian MOD, I'm lucky to have macro auto-scene on 20MP also.
Also, massive improvement in quality overall, the Z5 Camera libs really work great.
Now that I can see them side by side, it still appears that the Sony camera app reduces noise better than the 3rd party app. I had a similar experience in a comparison thread I created a while back as well.
Sent from the only flagship phone that actually fits in my hand... The Sony Xperia Z3 Compact
weekender90 said:
I've attached 8MP and 20 MP versions, Superior Auto Mode.
And thanks to Cyberian MOD, I'm lucky to have macro auto-scene on 20MP also.
Also, massive improvement in quality overall, the Z5 Camera libs really work great.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not bad for a macro shot. Here's mine using the Slim Rom i been using for couple of months.
I just used the sony camera with z5 camera libs, set to auto 8MP (4:3).
yoorie016 said:
Not bad for a macro shot. Here's mine using the Slim Rom i been using for couple of months.
I just used the sony camera with z5 camera libs, set to auto 8MP (4:3).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh my god, I'm in love with your photos...
Gonna flash this today and compare the results very strictly before and after flashing
romcio47 said:
Oh my god, I'm in love with your photos...
Gonna flash this today and compare the results very strictly before and after flashing
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks I didn't make any tweaks, i just used the auto and set the aspect ration to 4:3.
here's another one, and saved on JPEG format.
Jep im using open camera and snap camera they also give simelar results. I dont know why sony gave such a bad stock camera the difference is huge
The sony camera takes better pictures now than my galaxy s6
jody2k said:
Jep im using open camera and snap camera they also give simelar results. I dont know why sony gave such a bad stock camera the difference is huge
The sony camera takes better pictures now than my galaxy s6
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So stock camera is now better?
doriandiaconu said:
So stock camera is now better?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No i mean with open camera or snap camera its waayy better than stock camera
jody2k said:
No i mean with open camera or snap camera its waayy better than stock camera
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What rom are you using?
Sent from my D5803 using XDA Free mobile app
jody2k said:
Jep im using open camera and snap camera they also give simelar results. I dont know why sony gave such a bad stock camera the difference is huge
The sony camera takes better pictures now than my galaxy s6
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have a hard time agreeing with you. I tried to compare the stock camera software to various 3rd party software (including Open Camera) and the results indicated that Sony's produces better images:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/z3-compact/general/sonys-camera-isnt-worse-t3102790