Hi guys, I have a express card slot on my laptop and i am thinking of getting a usb 3.0 slot in it. I was wondering, since the 3.0 slot has the extra pins necessary, will it charge faster (even if not as fast as on the wall?)
mastermind1234321 said:
Hi guys, I have a express card slot on my laptop and i am thinking of getting a usb 3.0 slot in it. I was wondering, since the 3.0 slot has the extra pins necessary, will it charge faster (even if not as fast as on the wall?)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The extra pins in 3.0 only allow for higher data rates. The usb port still has a very low current capacity and will take way too long to charge the TF. Note the TF cable has USB3.0 Physicical propertys only, but does not conform to the USB electrical spec
Related
can i check with all bros using eee transformer is it possible to charge transformer through PC as i plug it in for more than 8 hours and it is still 60% but it went up when i put it to the asus usb adaptor to charge and if i were to use other commercial usb adaptor, it doesn;t charge again.
kindly advise. appriciate all input.
tf needs 15 volts, standard usb only provides 5 volts, hence no charge
bro trosenda, so i cannot charge through my pc?
what about commercial usb charger?
i thought they supply 15v also?
finally, is there a way to charge through PC?
I have my wifi policy set to sleep and my pc will charge my transformer, however it is very slow.
For a quick charge you need mains
bro straxusii, for main i have to use the usb adaptor that they supply? or any usb adaptor will do?
If you take a closer look inside the USB cable or adapter you'll see a set of extra pins behind the standard 4 USB pins. I presume these are used for charging the TF @15V. USB chargers output 5V.
The transformer does technically charge on any usb but only when the screen is off and even then at an extremely slow rate. With the screen on it wont even bother because the drain far exceeds the charge. 5v @ 1A max for your standard usb, 500mA on most laptop or pc usb ports, vs the transformer's native 15v @ 1.2A.
For main you will have to use the provided charger, its the most annoying part of the transformer right now.
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using Tapatalk
kylehase said:
If you take a closer look inside the USB cable or adapter you'll see a set of extra pins behind the standard 4 USB pins. I presume these are used for charging the TF @15V. USB chargers output 5V.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
woah never notice that. thought all usb cable are the same.
lacrossev said:
The transformer does technically charge on any usb but only when the screen is off and even then at an extremely slow rate. With the screen on it wont even bother because the drain far exceeds the charge. 5v @ 1A max for your standard usb, 500mA on most laptop or pc usb ports, vs the transformer's native 15v @ 1.2A.
For main you will have to use the provided charger, its the most annoying part of the transformer right now.
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this part i gotta agree with you bro. maybe in future they will come out with a usb charger which is capable of switching between 5v to 15v as and when we need. or just a usb charger for all sorts of things. maybe a 25v charger haha... might make things like iphone charge faster.
Does it charge with Micro USB? Or is there separate charger that would allow for simultaneous OTG & charging? If so, is it a samsung proprietary cable?
one port. I don't see why people are all upset with a tablet having one micro-USB port? What I would do to have micro USB on my Asus transformer prime, so damn annoying!
ANd plugging into a PC will charge slowly for most phones, and it depends on tablets, some do some don't. Even then, who leaves their tablet plugged into their PC all day anyways, a big no-no for phones as we all already know, won't charge very quickly...
Are the pogo pins not for charging?
matt11601 said:
Are the pogo pins not for charging?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They can charge as well when the tablet is in a dock (if that ever happens...). The pogo pins are not the primary charging method when not in a dock.
Samzebian said:
one port. I don't see why people are all upset with a tablet having one micro-USB port? What I would do to have micro USB on my Asus transformer prime, so damn annoying!
ANd plugging into a PC will charge slowly for most phones, and it depends on tablets, some do some don't. Even then, who leaves their tablet plugged into their PC all day anyways, a big no-no for phones as we all already know, won't charge very quickly...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ah.. well for one thing, I would say the primary reason is the one I just stated: simultaneous OTG + charging.
There are users out there that do not like the limitation of having no MicroSD card.. The closest thing, without microSD, is OTG. But the problem is that you cannot constantly use it or the battery will empty [also using battery cycles, that could have otherwise been avoided, and saved for when you really need them].
So may I ask where you got this conclusion? I would like to show it to someone.
Would a usb splitter work if you wanted the device to have two ports? Just a thought.
Initial_G said:
Would a usb splitter work if you wanted the device to have two ports? Just a thought.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, you'd be trying to charge the device, while it is giving out power on the same wires, to the USB OTG device.
The only way to fix it is with a kernel patch to disable outgoing power, and accept a charge with OTG.
Can't you buy an charger that fits the pogo pins. Not from google, of course.
Send from my lovely Sensation XL, from a little town in france with a very very slow internet connection.
If I succeed helping you (rare) don't forget to hit the thanks button
insevanhouts said:
Can't you buy an charger that fits the pogo pins. Not from google, of course.
Send from my lovely Sensation XL, from a little town in france with a very very slow internet connection.
If I succeed helping you (rare) don't forget to hit the thanks button
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
maybe..but on the Nexus 7, when you plugged in OTG storage, it would not charge with the pogo pins--at least I'm pretty sure I read this on xda.
so it might be like this on the Nexus 10 too, I dunno.. I guess we'll find out soon.
mvmacd said:
ah.. well for one thing, I would say the primary reason is the one I just stated: simultaneous OTG + charging.
There are users out there that do not like the limitation of having no MicroSD card.. The closest thing, without microSD, is OTG. But the problem is that you cannot constantly use it or the battery will empty [also using battery cycles, that could have otherwise been avoided, and saved for when you really need them].
So may I ask where you got this conclusion? I would like to show it to someone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was referring to charging/microUSB ports, had nothing to do with MicroSD card slots
Samzebian said:
I was referring to charging/microUSB ports, had nothing to do with MicroSD card slots
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, I meant, you asked why people were upset it just had one micro usb port [instead of--I assume--a charging port, and then an additional micro usb], and I said it is [at least for me] because it makes it harder to properly use external storage [that's needed for some people because of the lack of micro sd].
is there an official spec sheet that shows it charges via its only micro usb port?
Hi everyone, I was wondering what type of micro usb port was on the Nexus 10, I cant seem to find any close up photos, I am a noob when it comes to tablet and smartphones, but after looking around for OTG cables and such for my futur N10, I came accros micro usb type A which is bigger and thicker, and micro usb type B which is nice and thin, so I'm kind of confused, which type do I need for N10, can anyone fill me in?
Sorry if I posted this in the wrong thread, but it would probably of been silly to start one for such an easy question . ^^
mvmacd said:
Does it charge with Micro USB? Or is there separate charger that would allow for simultaneous OTG & charging? If so, is it a samsung proprietary cable?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, via a normal charger adapter. The USB cable is pluggable to the charger.
br, josh.
mvmacd said:
ah.. well for one thing, I would say the primary reason is the one I just stated: simultaneous OTG + charging.
There are users out there that do not like the limitation of having no MicroSD card.. The closest thing, without microSD, is OTG. But the problem is that you cannot constantly use it or the battery will empty [also using battery cycles, that could have otherwise been avoided, and saved for when you really need them].
So may I ask where you got this conclusion? I would like to show it to someone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry, but then buy a tablet that has a MicroSD. The Nexus series doesn't have MicroSD. If you don't like that, there are other options.
Hi,
I was wondering if using a 2A charger with a normal Micro USB cable will charge my Note 3 as fast as the same charger with a Micro USB 3.0 cable?
Considering that USB 3.0 only delivers a higher output compared to 2.0 when plugged into a PC, I guess it makes no difference when using wall chargers?
Am I right ?
Thanks in advance,
Ben
USB from a PC will always be less than a dedicated charger whether it is usb 2 or 3. A 2 amp charger is what I use but also pay attention to the lead as some are far better at handling higher currents than others as I found out trying various leads whilst running the app at https://play.google.com/store/apps...=organic&utm_term=galaxy+charging+current+apk
Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk 4
The phone detects if you are using a wall or usb charger, the second is considerably slower. Some usb chargers cheat to seem wall chargers so charges much faster.
What if I use a micro USB cable that is attached to a wall adapter plug, will it still charge fast on note 3?
Divine1604 said:
What if I use a micro USB cable that is attached to a wall adapter plug, will it still charge fast on note 3?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Charging is not depend on USB 3.0 or 2.0, it acts differently only while transferring data. Otehrwise for charging both works similar.
The stock wall adapter has 2Amp output and I’ve a power bank with same output and the Power Bank provided with a short USB 2.0 cable and with both it takes same time to full charge. So no issues with the cable.
All of my previous phones' chargers have been like 1A and usb 2.0. The note 3 quite obviously differs in both of those respects. Now, I know that I can charge my note 3 using all my old chargers no problem, even if it's a little slow. But, I've got two questions.
1. Does the usb 3.0 allow more current to the phone or just faster data transfer? i.e. Am I losing anything by using the note 3 wall wart with a usb 2.0 cable?
2. If a usb 2.0 will still deliver the same amperage: Say I left the 2A charger with a usb 2.0 lying around and someone with a less powerhungery phone comes along and plugs in, will that damage their device?
Any help is much appreciated.
Tyfighter said:
All of my previous phones' chargers have been like 1A and usb 2.0. The note 3 quite obviously differs in both of those respects. Now, I know that I can charge my note 3 using all my old chargers no problem, even if it's a little slow. But, I've got two questions.
1. Does the usb 3.0 allow more current to the phone or just faster data transfer? i.e. Am I losing anything by using the note 3 wall wart with a usb 2.0 cable?
2. If a usb 2.0 will still deliver the same amperage: Say I left the 2A charger with a usb 2.0 lying around and someone with a less powerhungery phone comes along and plugs in, will that damage their device?
Any help is much appreciated.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1. USB 2.0 and 3.0 charge the same. The extra pins are only for data.
2. No problem. Devices only pull as much current as they need.
Hey all,
I was just wondering, what's the USB 3.0 for? I mean, the micro SD card isn't fast enough to max out usb 2.0 transfer speeds, and the internal space is capped by the MTP system, right?
Thanks in advanced.
I believe sammy made internal sd cappable of transfering real quick, I tested it with my 32gb dunno wat was it called, but its supposed to be fast, like real fast...so 3.0 is from cellphone to computer, If yours support it, it will be the same as int storage to ext microsd(if it supports fast transfers)
Sent from my SM-G900H using Tapatalk
fenchai said:
I believe sammy made internal sd cappable of transfering real quick, I tested it with my 32gb dunno wat was it called, but its supposed to be fast, like real fast...so 3.0 is from cellphone to computer, If yours support it, it will be the same as int storage to ext microsd(if it supports fast transfers)
Sent from my SM-G900H using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don`t think the USB 3.0 is useful at all the Class 10 SD Cards has a write speed of 40 MB/s USB 2.0 is 60 MB/s so yes the SD card couldn`t even match the USB 2.0 Spec and internal storage is only 16 GB so even if it`s capable of reaching USB 3.0 speeds which I highly doubt as the USB 3.0 speeds are really close to the SATA 3.0 Specs and currently there is no hard disk on the world matching the SATA 3.0 Specs so I doubt that the internal storage is capable of reaching USB 3.0 so yes the USB 3.0 is not useful probably the only reason we have it is because it charge the phone faster then a USB 2.0 cable because of the additional pins.
bnight said:
I don`t think the USB 3.0 is useful at all the Class 10 SD Cards has a write speed of 40 MB/s USB 2.0 is 60 MB/s so yes the SD card couldn`t even match the USB 2.0 Spec and internal storage is only 16 GB so even if it`s capable of reaching USB 3.0 speeds which I highly doubt as the USB 3.0 speeds are really close to the SATA 3.0 Specs and currently there is no hard disk on the world matching the SATA 3.0 Specs so I doubt that the internal storage is capable of reaching USB 3.0 so yes the USB 3.0 is not useful probably the only reason we have it is because it charge the phone faster then a USB 2.0 cable because of the additional pins.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think they went with usb 3.0 with the sole purpose of increasing charging rate, the batteries are starting to increase in size but the rate they charge hasn't really changed much so they went with usb 3.0 to increase the rate. Quickcharge 2.0 is coming soon though so that should help to
Sent from my HTCONE using Tapatalk
luigi311 said:
I think they went with usb 3.0 with the sole purpose of increasing charging rate, the batteries are starting to increase in size but the rate they charge hasn't really changed much so they went with usb 3.0 to increase the rate. Quickcharge 2.0 is coming soon though so that should help to
Sent from my HTCONE using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
usb chargers are NOT usb 3, they don't have the extra back row of pins needed, they only use the standard 4 pin usb which is usb 2. if you use a charging program like galaxy charging current you get no improvement with usb2 over usb3. most s5's were only shipped with usb2 cables anyway. quick charge 2.0 is based on standard usb2.
yeah i dont see any speed difference tbh
markymarkis said:
usb chargers are NOT usb 3, they don't have the extra back row of pins needed, they only use the standard 4 pin usb which is usb 2. if you use a charging program like galaxy charging current you get no improvement with usb2 over usb3. most s5's were only shipped with usb2 cables anyway. quick charge 2.0 is based on standard usb2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes if you charge from Laptop but what if you use the charger ? Since i have both usb 3 and usb 2 cables I will test to see if there is a difference in the charging time.
Can you please test and let us know whether usb 3.0 cable charges faster or not
Sent from my SM-G900H using XDA Free mobile app