Database Users

Android 2 is AOSP

YAY!!!! If you don't know what that means.. don't bother replying to the thread k
If you do let's start getting some dev on the go!

Great news.

I am cool with it
aosp
... Athabasca Oil Sands Project

Actuarial Standards of Practice

Android Open Source Project

BJNK said:
Android Open Source Project
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that was my next guess

DEVELOP. 10 chars.

And just when I got 1.6 running how I wanted it
Can't wait to try Android 2!

I figured someone had beat me to the post. It won't be long now, cyanogenmod has ported it for his G1 - I want it just for the lockscreen (actual screenshot)

polyrhythmic said:
I figured someone had beat me to the post. It won't be long now, cyanogenmod has ported it for his G1 - I want it just for the lockscreen (actual screenshot)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed, that lock screen looks very nice.

oooo daddy likes

[Kernel] 2.6.29 kernel for AOSP roms

Hey guys, i kinda felt bad for you guys, how you guys still don't have a true aosp build (minus the crappy froyo sdk which isn't built for any target). so i decided to make you guys a kernel that should work on your phones. i'm only gunna supply the zImage for you guys, if you want to know how i got the touchscreen to work, all i did was take the drivers/input/touchscreen/synaptics_i2c_rmi.c from cm-kernel and put it into my kernel source. well devs, have fun with this. you guys can now make a real cyanogenmod or aosp rom. This kernel is OC'd at 768 mhz. I'm only gunna supply the zImage, you devs make this work for your roms
Thanks Toastcfh for getting overclock to work on msm7k android devices
Kernel
wlan.ko

darchstar said:
Hey guys, i kinda felt bad for you guys, how you guys still don't have a true aosp build (minus the crappy froyo sdk which isn't built for any target). so i decided to make you guys a kernel that should work on your phones. i'm only gunna supply the zImage for you guys, if you want to know how i got the touchscreen to work, all i did was take the drivers/input/touchscreen/synaptics_i2c_rmi.c from cm-kernel and put it into my kernel source. well devs, have fun with this. you guys can now make a real cyanogenmod or aosp rom. This kernel is OC'd at 768 mhz. I'm only gunna supply the zImage, you devs make this work for your roms
i will supply the wlan.ko to accompany this soon
darchroms.pocketdevelopers.com/zimages/zImage
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks man

Thanks man
I was about to start on this.
This will make my job million times easier.
btw,
Is this cm kernel you're talking about the one that is on your github?
The work is appreciated!

Framework43 said:
Thanks man
I was about to start on this.
This will make my job million times easier.
btw,
Is this cm kernel you're talking about the one that is on your github?
The work is appreciated!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
cyanogen-kernel. its the one from his github

much appreciated Darch.

darchstar said:
cyanogen-kernel. its the one from his github
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
********************

hmmmmmmmmmm

oh man, now I can smell true AOSP cooking up right now somewhere in here... time to get rid of those chunky SenseUI. Dont get me wrong, There's nothing wrong with Sense UI, it's matter of personal preference and I'm just old school from G1 and loyal fan of AOSP build.

ChillCola said:
You are here making noise, butthurt that your rom didnt hit the news like Punkaos's did, and now you want to cause more drama. Don't thank him, his kernel doesn't work. The Touchscreen drivers are not right.
Are you violating the Linux license by not releasing the source? Kanging from 1000s of developers! How awful. I see no credit given!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ROFL, have you asked him for source code rather than jumping conclusion? people like you like to stir up drama
By the way I believe he did gave cyanogen credit, when he mention it's from his github....

ChillCola said:
You are here making noise, butthurt that your rom didnt hit the news like Punkaos's did, and now you want to cause more drama. Don't thank him, his kernel doesn't work. The Touchscreen drivers are not right.
Are you violating the Linux license by not releasing the source? Kanging from 1000s of developers! How awful. I see no credit given!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
why would i need to re-release source for your kernel. does that make sense. all i did was edit two files in the source. those files are on toastcfh's github. i don't need to re-release the source. that would be a waste of time and effort. please, if you don't like me, just pm me and we'll settle things.
also, i'm pretty sure this works unless i forgot to recompile your source after i changed the file
has anyone else tried it besides the preteen who blatantly has some sort of bias against me?

Thanks darchstar! I've always been envious of your AOSP roms.

alexhendershott said:
Thanks darchstar! I've always been envious of your AOSP roms.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AOSP Eclair is done
Wait for it soon

Framework43 said:
AOSP Eclair is done
Wait for it soon
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so that preteen was wrong then . alright cool. seems my work here is done

this is awesome news. Thanks darc for the kernel, and thanks framework for your aosp rom. can't wait to flash it!!!!

darchstar said:
so that preteen was wrong then . alright cool. seems my work here is done
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually, its true what he says. The kernel doesn't fix the touchscreen.

Framework43 said:
Actually, its true what he says. The kernel doesn't fix the touchscreen.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
oh, ok then, then you just followed my directions in what i did and it worked for you?

omg...omg..omg...... can we keep this thread drama free cola? I read to have a badass phone..not to imagine a sitcom.

darchstar said:
oh, ok then, then you just followed my directions in what i did and it worked for you?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm using whatever Kaos did to his kernel.

ChillCola said:
Bit cocky for someone who's #### doesn't work.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
try it now, i updated it

ChillCola said:
Bit cocky for someone who's #### doesn't work.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think I smell drama bomb in here... what do you expect? perfectly functional kernel on first try? LOL took me about 2-3 tries to get it working right for my Ubuntu.

Any Developer Interested in A Official Cyanogenmod Rom?

I noticed lately that the supported devices officially for cyanogenmod is getting bigger and bigger, so maybe one of you guys can talk to cyanogen bout joinin his team.. i remember from his website he had this to say recently:
"A lot of people ask me about adding support for their phone, but we can only support phones that we actually own. The CM team is always looking for new hackers to join up with us to add support for their favorite device. Get in touch with me if you’d like to help."
I know that there is roms pretty much quality and as up to date as an official cyanogenmod, but these roms are only limited by the website its on. unfortunately not everyone knows about xda (shocking thought, since im on here daily).
i hope the big devs for the eris reads this, for im sure its a good idea.....

Honestly the Roms that get handed out here are better than Cyanogen in that the people that make them implement their own tweaks inside the core of the rom that make them better. I personally WOULD use an official Cyanogen rom because who knows maybe its more stable and all, but still.

Since he already plays the role with his kernel and vendor tree, I vote for Canop
Canop for Cyanogenmod!
Sent from my Eris using XDA App

I vote Conap too! lol
I'm not really sure of much added benefit from "official" cm releases other than the ability to flash a nightly build every day. Most of the devs build their rom directly from cm source or port the nightles. With the way it is now you have a choice of many custom cm roms whereas some devices with "official" cm support only have the cm release.
Sent from my nonsensikal froyo

I've wondered about this too, but like others have said... We are probably better off the way it is now or at least not any worse off. The Hero builds are relatively easy to port and building from source has been worked out pretty well, so it doesn't really matter if we have an 'official' one.

+1 for Conap.
I would like to see an official build.

I vote for Conap, gnarlyc, SikYou & me... let's take over the world guys!!! lmao
btw... Conap's rom... Sik's rom... My rom... are basically Pure CM already

Ok. I'll fix the camera.
workshed said:
I vote for Conap, gnarlyc, SikYou & me... let's take over the world guys!!! lmao
btw... Conap's rom... My rom... are basically Pure CM already
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

gnarlyc said:
Ok. I'll fix the camera.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol, we have a working camera ... now if you'd just fix the aosp camera

Tazz.. my vote all the way
Sent from my Eris using XDA App

workshed said:
I vote for Conap, gnarlyc, SikYou & me... let's take over the world guys!!! lmao
btw... Conap's rom... Sik's rom... My rom... are basically Pure CM already
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know what the big deal is, we've got pretty good roms already.

workshed said:
I vote for Conap, gnarlyc, SikYou & me... let's take over the world guys!!! lmao
btw... Conap's rom... Sik's rom... My rom... are basically Pure CM already
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
btw shed so is mine

tazzpatriot said:
btw shed so is mine
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Damn, you must be from the south, sensitive much? lol (Classic tazz comeback)
You're never in the irc chan, so I'm not including you in my sentance

Stonent said:
I don't know what the big deal is, we've got pretty good roms already.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And I'm not sure why you quoted me, then said that

My phone isn't powered by batteries. It's powered by Kaos
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh... I see why now lol

workshed said:
Damn, you must be from the south, sensitive much? lol (Classic tazz comeback)
You're never in the irc chan, so I'm not including you in my sentance
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
its cool just wanted o see how u would responed

tazzpatriot said:
its cool just wanted o see how u would responed
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
... go looking for trouble, and you'll definitely find it

the whole point of having it officially done is to not only have a way wider audience, but also to have all the setup for anyone to compile.. it really opens up the development of a device...

Wider audience? There are only 8 of us that still own the eris and 4 of us are upgrading in January lol
Sent from my nonsensikal froyo

SikYou said:
Wider audience? There are only 8 of us that still own the eris and 4 of us are upgrading in January lol
Sent from my nonsensikal froyo
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lmao... ZING! I predict this forum will be a desert wasteland after x-mas this year. Kind of Bums me out, but it's gotta happen some time. I'll still be here though lol

Woot!! Gingerbread aosp out!!

I see some gingerbread in our future google just dropped the source code on their repository... (edit) Actually they are dropping it now, as I type probably won't be done for a lil while..
swyped from my HD2 Android

Check these out...
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=865161
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=877777
That first one is 10 days old already!

johncmolyneux said:
Check these out...
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=865161
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=877777
That first one is 10 days old already!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Those are SDK builds and pretty worthless, we needed the source code for a decent build. So yeah, this is exciting news!

StephanV said:
Those are SDK builds and pretty worthless, we needed the source code for a decent build. So yeah, this is exciting news!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay. I don't think they're "pretty worthless" at all, and I wasn't poo-pooing you. I was just pointing out that we already have some gingerbread - didn't know if you knew or not.

StephanV said:
Those are SDK builds and pretty worthless, we needed the source code for a decent build. So yeah, this is exciting news!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
my build NOT from SDK

m-deejay said:
my build NOT from SDK
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My bad, I only checked the first link and assumed the second one was SDK too, as there are two floating around. Yours looks awesome, no disrespect at all of course!
@john: I'm not TS btw, no hard feelings. SDK builds have always been unuseable, that's just in their nature. Sure, they may be fun to play around with for a couple of hours, but as a build they're worthless, imo.

Good news

Cyanogenmod:
Revert "Removed Vibrant from list of CyanogenMod devices"
Emergency call is fixed and we have a new maintainer now.
Anyone know who the new maintainer is?

"Mute" bug is fixed, and I have a feeling that was a symptom of the 911 issue.

Haxel said:
"Mute" bug is fixed, and I have a feeling that was a symptom of the 911 issue.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mute bug isn't part of the 911 issue (except maybe that fixing E911 coulda brought the mute bug back). The E911 issue was fixed back in January.

I was so happy when I saw this, I will do some snooping to find out who the new maintainer is but this is great news

bearsfan85 said:
I was so happy when I saw this, I will do some snooping to find out who the new maintainer is but this is great news
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Probably the guy who reviewed the change...

Great news, thanks for the post
Sent from my SGH-T959 using Tapatalk

FaultException said:
Probably the guy who reviewed the change...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That would make sense, though there are a lot of Daniel Bateman's out there so its tough to figure out who he is on XDA though I want him to know his work is greatly appreciated

bearsfan85 said:
That would make sense, though there are a lot of Daniel Bateman's out there so its tough to figure out who he is on XDA though I want him to know his work is greatly appreciated
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True. GitHub shows real names too sometimes, like this: https://github.com/FaultException

FaultException said:
True. GitHub shows real names too sometimes, like this: https://github.com/FaultException
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I realized it was you quickly but after I saw that you responded without answering the question I figured I would just keep that information to myself
go to cyans github, go to the vibrant, see who made recent commits ect.

bearsfan85 said:
I realized it was you quickly but after I saw that you responded without answering the question I figured I would just keep that information to myself
go to cyans github, go to the vibrant, see who made recent commits ect.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Still pending approval though.

FaultException said:
Still pending approval though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are awesome!

creeve4 said:
You are awesome!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not. I'm actually a relative noob to Android rom programming. Pawitp and others from teamhacksung have been a good help.
The changes by Pawitp readding vibrant just got approved.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App

New nightly (229) is up. I guess that makes it official.
http://download.cyanogenmod.com/?device=vibrantmtd

Read the build prop , it's 2.3.7 nightly #229
But whose complaining! Great we're back up in good graces!

Dougfresh said:
Read the build prop , it's 2.3.7 nightly #229
But whose complaining! Great we're back up in good graces!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What did you expect? There are Jo official cm9 builds yet for many phone, as the main cm9 code base hasn't been marked official.
Sent from my HTC Sensation Z710e

Is there a device specific change log for the Vibrant still? I was curious to see if anything besides "removed/revert removed" was changed from #182 to #229.

djf8 said:
Is there a device specific change log for the Vibrant still? I was curious to see if anything besides "removed/revert removed" was changed from #182 to #229.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not much specifically. But there's all the common stuff.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App

I have a Telus SGH-959D, was looking at the Passion or ICSSGS ROMs, but now I might wait for CM9 .
Too bad Samsung just decided to cop out and use their freaking Touchwiz as an excuse to do so, I want my ice cream dammit!

djf8 said:
Is there a device specific change log for the Vibrant still? I was curious to see if anything besides "removed/revert removed" was changed from #182 to #229.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The best I know of is
http://cm-nightlies.appspot.com/?device=vibrantmtd