[Q] Working AdHoc wpa-supplicant configuration for my Glacier? - myTouch 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting

I'm looking for a wpa-supplicant that support AdHoc in my HTC Glacier but I've found nothing, I've seen a lot in other threads but none works for me, the best thing I've achieved is see AdHoc networks, even "connect" me through them, BUT my phone has no internet.
Can anyone telle why is so hard to get a configuration that actually works on my HTC Glacier?
Please help!

Wrong section this should be moved to Q&A section not Development. Good Luck.

Related

Samsung Omnia i900/i910 Tethering

Anyone successfully get this to work on the Omnia?
I've tried the ICS cab + WMWIFIROUTER with Verizon's Touch Pro and that easily worked with out issue.
With the Omnia and I think or suspect it has something to do with the JAGUARGSP chipset it uses vs what HTC uses, the typical ICS cab flowing around isn't working for it.
I've tried all sort of tethering method, including one method here on Tethering with Wifi doesn't seem to work either.
Any insight to this?
By the way, on the Omnia HKLM\Comm\ConnectionSharing\PrivateInterface is blank, there is no value in there if that means anything.
These are the threads I look at so far.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=332360
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=1542516
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=1585011#post1585011
http://forums.cingular.com/cng/board/message?board.id=cingular&thread.id=58582
Thanks,
bump. Any one?
There is a Questions & Answers section for this.
please use it.
nevermind answered my own ?
hooover said:
nevermind answered my own ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you post what the answer? I have an Epix and I haven't tried tethering because I've read that people have had problems with it. I know I'll need to do it soon.
There is a discussion on another forum about tethering on the Epix that might help you out if you still have problems. I don't know what the policy is on this forum regarding links to other sites so if you are curious, please PM me and I'll send you the reference.
Yes, that would be great to see the discussion. I am sure most Samsung will or might have similar issue. I think it has something to do with they using a different WLAN chipset. The JAGUARGSP isn't compatible with that HTC using the most of the cab floating out there are built to use what HTC uses.
This is the WIFI Network Control Panel I have. I think I need the intshare.dll that is compatible wifi driver I have I guess.
I managed to use the tethering with success on the omnia.
I also am using the ICS cab + WMWIFIROUTER on the omina.

WPA2 PEAP only works on sense builds

Hey guys!
Only sense based builds seem to work with PEAP WPA2 enterprise networks (Both SD/NAND versions). There is a well known problem on Android where the phone does not seem to remember the MSCHAPV2 authentication option even if it is explicitly selected.
I wanted to post this in the dev forum but didn't want to clutter up the place but if any devs can integrate this into non-sense builds, that would be greatly appreciated.
This is the only reason I can't use pure froyo/gingerbread builds anymore as my usiversity uses this configuration for its WiFi and the alternative being me having to log in every couple of steps as I walk around the campus moving between access points.
Thanks for reading!
exact problem
i hav the exact same problem with my university. univ.of tx at dallas.
i wonder if there is a solution and if there is anyone actually reading this.
please reply if someone finds a solution.
So it is a non-sense problem
So here I was thinking it would be a Gingerbread fail.
I first flashed "LEO "Stock Desire" (Cotulla)" and all was well as I signed in to the wpa2-enterprise WiFi using PEAPv0/EAP-MSCHAPv2, but I wanted more. Both Gingerbread ROMS TyphooN and PPC_SHIFTPDA gave problems with the WiFi. Hopefully will work soon.

[Q] Getting vpn working for cisco

Ok so I'm sure there are others that would like to get vpnc widget working I have looked at links and none are clear to me. Need help
wrong area this needs to be moved to general area
I posted it here because I was hoping developers would see this. The standard VPN that honeycomb offers doesn't work with Cisco IPSec XauthUsername/XAuthPassword. My Vibrant has the VPNC widget and works fine. I have installed the tun.ko file and tried with openvpn/ vpnc widget and no go.
we dont just stay in this area. i go even to the acc. area a few times a day and i know others do also. and when a fix is found some1 will post the fix here. this goes for every1 if u post in the correct area u get helped fast. dont pm some1 unless it states to. dont make multiple post with the same question or fix. this goes for any and every forum. im not attacking u or anyone just giving food for thought. i cant help as i dont have this tab any more
Sent from my Evo using Tapatalk
Ok I don't know how to move the post . I'm very new to posting. Any help much appreciated...
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1075631
I opened a thread earlier today.. so far no joy, and we are going from ipsec to ssl..
so I imagine its just openvpn and a bunch of coinfig..
but you need to start with the tun.ko module, found in another thread
VPN
thanks for briefing!
thanks for the help!!! You guys are awesome!!

Found our tablet on Samsung OSRC, talanted devs needed :)

Hi everyone
as many many other users, I'm looking for a solution to enable ad-hoc networks with many failed attempts...
the only obstacle that faced all devs on all forums is that they can't produce working wpa_supplicant as they can't edit the appropriate source code for our tablets,
now, devs CAN view the ICS source code via samsung OSRC :
http://opensource.samsung.com/reception/receptionSub.do?method=search&searchValue=GT-P5113
can any 'super talanted' developer make a working ICS wpa_supplicant that can view ad-hoc networks for us?
:good: folks, if you need this too, reply the poll shown above to show developers how many need this
So I guess you all don't need adhoc anymore seems like I'm the only one need this!! forget it devs :\
I have a general idea what ad hoc is but maybe not the whole picture. So can someone please explain why I would need that capability? It seems ICS has included ways to connect devices together to share files, internet, multiplayer gaming.
Edit- Just did a search and have a better understanding but still dont quite get why or what it would be used for.
IFLATLINEI said:
So can someone please explain why I would need that capability?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Technically speaking, ad-hoc networks does not need (infrastructure) to operate, like routers, access points ... etc,
in general, we can say it's a state in which all devices have the same status and communicate with each other freely without routing or so,
In my case, it's just too simple that I need to get my GT-P5113 tablet tethered with my Nokia phone :laugh:
unfortunately, the stupid Symbian OS of Nokia can generate ad-hoc networks only, so if I take my tablet outside without an available wifi-hotspot (most of time), the only option is tethering with my phone to get connected ...
there were many patches for the earlier android versions, but for ICS still no one could make a working wpa_supplicant patch to enable it,
the obstacle was that we couldn't reach the 'source' of samsung ICS used on our tablets, now samsung released it ... but seems like no one interested in this feature anymore
I still am interested in ad hoc on the tablet and also on the same boat for tethering with my Nokia (N8 FTW). I've been looking frantically for a solution even rooted it 3 days after purchase hoping I can enable the ad hoc.
Would switching to a custom rom solve this problem??
There's also patch made by Polish dev Szym who found that method. Patch automatically make changes in the wpa_supplicant source, but we need someone who know how coding and building from android source.
I already sent to szym question about help, he don't yet mail me back so I waiting for the answer atm.
Patch can be found here - szym.net/2010/12/adhoc-wifi-in-android/
Im only not soure if it support ICS, coz guide was written long time ago...
If someone would be able to undertake this, I'll be glad for modified wpa_supplicant to GT-P3110 as well.
opensource.samsung.com/reception/receptionSub.do?method=search&searchValue=GT-P3110
I hope we manage it soon, stay tuned.
paul p said:
There's also patch made by Polish dev Szym who found that method. Patch automatically make changes in the wpa_supplicant source, but we need someone who know how coding and building from android source.
I already sent to szym question about help, he don't yet mail me back so I waiting for the answer atm.
Patch can be found here - szym.net/2010/12/adhoc-wifi-in-android/
Im only not soure if it support ICS, coz guide was written long time ago...
If someone would be able to undertake this, I'll be glad for modified wpa_supplicant to GT-P3110 as well.
opensource.samsung.com/reception/receptionSub.do?method=search&searchValue=GT-P3110
I hope we manage it soon, stay tuned.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Keep us updated.
I have a hunch the patch is not for ics because it was made a good while ago. If someone can just have the modified wpa file which works with ics to catch ad hoc signal, that would be fantastic. I wonder what changed in ics that made all modded wpa file not working.
Ad Hoc GT2 7 FTW!!!
fsjon said:
Keep us updated.
I have a hunch the patch is not for ics because it was made a good while ago. If someone can just have the modified wpa file which works with ics to catch ad hoc signal, that would be fantastic. I wonder what changed in ics that made all modded wpa file not working.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Has there been any progress on this? I'm desperately looking for a solution.

Wi-Fi calling help

I didn't see a thread for this yet, so I'll start this one for questions about wifi calling. Yes there is a thread for the update that includes wifi calling. If this is too redundant, Mods, just delete it.
My main question: does anyone know how to get wifi to work on a secured network like many workplaces use? I doubt my minimalist IT department has the proper ports and such open it whatever, so I'd like to know if there is a workaround.
Well, 111 views and no replies. Guess it's just not possible. Oh well.

Categories

Resources