Gingerbread 2.3.4 Nenamark results. - Atrix 4G General

I'm just curious about the performance of the Atrix running gingerbread. Anyone mind running Nenamark and Nenamark2 and posting the results? Thanks.
Sent from my Atrix, using XDA app.

I believe this was already posted in another topic
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lhdEeu3WUXA

nenamark1 = 47.3 fps
nenamark2 = 23.3 fps

kdoodle said:
I believe this was already posted in another topic
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lhdEeu3WUXA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wanted both results. I saw that thread.
Sent from my Atrix, using XDA app.

redz22 said:
nenamark1 = 47.3 fps
nenamark2 = 23.3 fps
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks!
Sent from my Atrix, using XDA app.

Related

post your benchmark in here

i have tried 2 times for quadrant test and my DHD scored 1958
http://smartphonebenchmarks.com/
Sent from my Desire HD using XDA App
2032 out the box, I love this phone its absolutely flying
Sent from my Desire HD using XDA App
2736 after OC'ing...
MFLOPS:56.087
4Ghz i7 does ~60GFLOPS on LinX.
leppie said:
MFLOPS:56.087
4Ghz i7 does ~60GFLOPS on LinX.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Now do a ratio with power consuption and see what you get.
Quadrant score of 1851 with 1.72 build, i do like this beast of a phone
1964 score 1.72 stock Rom no overlooking or adjustment.
Sent from my Desire HD using XDA App
kurolife said:
Now do a ratio with power consuption and see what you get.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Around 250-300W vs ???
I have no idea what the DHD uses. Say 250ma x 1.2V = ~300mW. So measured performance per watt, they quite similar.

Atrix Gingerbread Leaked rom with benchmarks FAKE OR NOT ??

Fake or not? Seems that the scores are highter than the Froyo stock
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lhdEeu3WUXA
I hope its real and I hope its from someone who will leak it.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA Premium App
yungboss22 said:
Fake or not? Seems that the scores are highter than the Froyo stock
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lhdEeu3WUXA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why don't you ask kennethpenn?? By the way the discussion is already going on over in dev section
Sent from my HTC Vision
Scores don't seem too different from froyo. There's a thread in the dev section with preview videos.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1104716
Sent from my MB860 using XDA Premium App
I did a CSI analysis on the video....i cannot confirm if it is authentic.
sifon187 said:
I did a CSI analysis on the video....i cannot confirm if it is authentic.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can confirm the video is real... Just not so. Certain about the gingerbread man.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Uuh... yea.... i can say i'm running Honeycomb if i want to. Hard to believe a video of something if the only thing remotely close to "proof" is the video title. No settings screen... no nothing.
Recent apps didn't look like the gb blur recent apps on dx also oddly careful not to show any of the os. Pretty sure this is fake
Sent from my Xoom using XDA Premium App
Zac95 said:
Recent apps didn't look like the gb blur recent apps on dx also oddly careful not to show any of the os. Pretty sure this is fake
Sent from my Xoom using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Was about to point that out about the recent apps...plus I'm on froyo running ginger blur and have averaged about 58-60 fps on neocore. This is a bogus vid.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA Premium App
This video is weird... i have 54 on neocore and 40 on nenamark ( 56.7 neocore and 51 nenamark on this video ) why the scores are highter?
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
maybe because of some mod of him, got it didyungboss22 ?
like me, i already got over 3000 in quadrant, my higher screenshot is of 2975(qudrant scores btw 2700/2900), when i get 3000+ again, ill get one screenshot and post in here =)
sifon187 said:
I did a CSI analysis on the video....i cannot confirm if it is authentic.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you enhance?
the video isn't fake, and the scores are accurate, but it doesn't mean that this particular person is running gingerbread on the atrix, especially since he never shows any part of the new motoblur os. the fact that gingerbread is coming out soon though and is already in testing on the atrix has been proven to us by Kennethpenn, who has real screenshots and video on both the briefmobile site and the thread in the dev section here. whats the point of wasting time argueing over whether a video like this is using the real gingerbread os when you can go get actual info, screenshots, and vids just 3 clicks away
56.7 fps on Neocore, 40.8 fps on Nenamark1, 22.8 fps on Nenamark2, 2539 on Quadrant. Temperature never went over 32 Centigrade/Celsius, back to back tests.
Should add 4.1.83, Gingerbreak, Gladenable, Tenfars CWM, GladiAtrix 3, Cool Blue themed.

Antutu benchmark scoring

Just thought you guys should submit your scores, I find it hard to believe my atrix is the highest score. My score is 6165. Someone beat me!
Wow. Lame. Hope you feel better.
I voided my warranty and your mum.
Lol I just wanted to entice competition, see what scores people are getting. What to expect from different ROMs and clockspeeds.
I piss excellence
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
ill play later lol!
Sass86 said:
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What's your setup?
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Cm7, fauxs 020 kernel 1.3ghz. I saw some guy actually was ahead of me by 20 points, clocked at 1ghz... that's impressive! How did he do that?
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Welcome to the world of benchmarking.
I voided my warranty and your mum.
Sass86 said:
Cm7, fauxs 020 kernel 1.3ghz. I saw some guy actually was ahead of me by 20 points, clocked at 1ghz... that's impressive! How did he do that?
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He probably set his min and max to 1000Mhz, which is pointless.
Samsung galaxy s2 top 1 score
ITALY at TOP
Magggggruuuubbber
#1 if u ain't first ur last
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
just got 6710 with faux's 1.45GHz overclock on CM7.. didn't set my CPU to max max either.. how'd u get such fast SD card speeds though! they are what killed my score! D:
DarkRyoushii said:
just got 6710 with faux's 1.45GHz overclock on CM7.. didn't set my CPU to max max either.. how'd u get such fast SD card speeds though! they are what killed my score! D:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Buy a good, speedy SDCard and not generic class 2-4 ones
Here is mine... Thanks to all the DEVS!!!
CM7.1 ¬B^¬N and Faux's latest 2.1 1.45ghz
Haven't tried any of the old tricks yet
Apparently if you put your device in airplane mode and do some other tweaks you can squeeze more out, but I have to say I was pleasantly surprised when I saw 6815. My SD card write is what is confusing me. Before the stop-gap CM7 I could have sworn it was ~100 or more, but now it is ~60 at best.
6813 on casual bench. Sorry can't post links yet.
CM7 with faux 1.3ghz kernel. Cache 4096, vm heap 32, databases converted to WAL (huge sd boost), sysctl mods (though doubt they help much on bench):
vm.vfs_cache_pressure = 10
vm.dirty_background_ratio = 70
vm.dirty_ratio = 90
vm.dirty_writeback_centisecs = 1500
vm.dirty_expire_centisecs = 1500
vm.min_free_kbytes = 4096
vm.oom_kill_allocating_task = 0
About to flash fauxs 1.45 and stage a proper bench.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
turl1 said:
Buy a good, speedy SDCard and not generic class 2-4 ones
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the read write speeds of the sdcard you get from antutu i believe are for the internal memory. i read in a few places this is the case plus to verify it i removed my external and received the same score. i also have a class 10 external sdcard.
gentledroid17 said:
the read write speeds of the sdcard you get from antutu i believe are for the internal memory.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ya its internal. Also, SD read/write speeds can be increased by upwards of 100% by using Titanium Backup to convert all databases to WAL. Do a full backup prior.
Here's my benchmarks. Hit 6846 in antutu. If I read right its highest atrix bench on antutu?
tapatalk.com/mu/62b1ab7e-dd75-5f56.jpg
tapatalk.com/mu/62b1ab7e-dd9c-40c6.jpg
tapatalk.com/mu/62b1ab7e-ddbf-e028.jpg
tapatalk.com/mu/62b1ab7e-ddd9-348e.jpg
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Sorry... not the highest...
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1294749&page=8
I don't understand well the Sysctl settings, do you have a link about it ?

Usa v6 speed mod

dsexton702 said:
These are some tweaks created by dsexton702 that offer you a generous performance boost in I/O and giving you the newest fugu mod 3.1. This is a fast growing tweak and needs to be shared with everyone who can benefit from it
download the U.S.A.Sv6
OP: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1236779
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It does work on our phones as I'm using right know...just thought I pass on the good work of these devs...
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium
What is it like V6SuperCharger?
Sent from my PG06100 using XDA App
It speeds up and opyimuzes androids Input and output....its just version6 of the mod.....thy have a new version but I haven't tried yet..I've used this on my HTC hd2 and mytouch 4g and know my shift .....
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium
Idk if I posted in right section if not can mod move this please to right one....
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium
v6 supercharger is useless IMO. Tweak your data setting in ##DATA# with a sense rom and use a good kernel like super scary stable.
VICODAN said:
v6 supercharger is useless IMO. Tweak your data setting in ##DATA# with a sense rom and use a good kernel like super scary stable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You see I did tweak my ##DATA# setting and use Scarykernel on the latest CM7 nightlies. There's a noticable improvement using V6Supercharger over without on my device.
Sent from my PG06100 using XDA App
Same here I have found a noticable speed also in quadrent score also....
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium
bigfdaddy said:
Same here I have found a noticable speed also in quadrent score also....
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What's your antutu score with Scary kernel on toasty at 1900mhz?
Here the score Wich includes v6 mod,scary govener,1900mhz over clock,and SD booster...
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium
bigfdaddy said:
Here the score Wich includes v6 mod,scary govener,1900mhz over clock,and SD booster...
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Proof that this **** is useless:
Scarystable compcache disabled:
RAM 612
CPU integer 1221
CPU float-point 518
2d graphics 276
3d graphics 793
database io 535
sdcard write 9.9MB/s 99
sdcard read 17.5 MB/s 175
total score: 4229
Linpack single thread score = 62.33 MFLOPS, Time 1.35 Seconds, Norm Res 5.68, Precision 2.22044604...
Linpack multi thread score = 57.961 MFLOPS, Time 2.91 seconds Norm Res, 3.24, Precision 2.22044604...
P.S. You should use Toasty gov for benchmarking and run benchmarks on a fresh boot and close as many apps as possible.
BTW:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1296614
---------- Post added at 01:51 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:54 AM ----------
Benchmark scores do not prove actual real life performance...
They are just numbers ppl like to boast about and doesn't mean your phone is any faster/more responsive with a higher score.
And. Any scores wether antutu/quadrant/or whatever can be faked.
Sent from my Supreme Shift on Wires!
notsointeresting said:
Benchmark scores do not prove actual real life performance...
They are just numbers ppl like to boast about and doesn't mean your phone is any faster/more responsive with a higher score.
And. Any scores wether antutu/quadrant/or whatever can be faked.
Sent from my Supreme Shift on Wires!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wouldn't be wasting my breath and posting fake benchmark scores if I didn't believe it and try this mod.
The only difference I noticed was LPP loading a little bit faster on startup.
VICODAN said:
I wouldn't be wasting my breath and posting fake benchmark scores if I didn't believe it and try this mod.
The only difference I noticed was LPP loading a little bit faster on startup.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well every little bit counts doesn't it?.....ty for trying it tho and posting ya score....
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium
bigfdaddy said:
Well every little bit counts doesn't it?.....ty for trying it tho and posting ya score....
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Np.. just saying everytime I flash a nightly I have to do this.. it's annoying as hell where as I just flash ScaryStable once with each nightly flash and I'm good to go and I notice a HUGE difference in performance.
For what it's worth, the V6 Supercharger (currently running the update9 beta) provides an optimal RAM manager which eliminated my habit of installing AutoKiller w/ every ROM. Since running the Supercharger script, I've consistently ran w/ 175-180MB in free RAM w/ no app FC's. That alone is worth using this mod in my book.
Ty 4 trying.....tying to expand this to more people and let them know about it.I.think its worth all the hype and attention I can give it.
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium

Z19 Discussion Thread

Anyone tried z19?? Its a new blade rom with amazing performance.
Google it, and watch the YouTube video
:sly:
Sent from my Blade using xda premium
karthiknr said:
You've opened a discussion thread for a ROM that no one knows about in the Development Section? According to the video it looks like a themed CM based ROM.
I didn't see any amazing performance. The scrolling itself was laggy.
Sent from my Blade using XDA app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dude I myself don't know **** about it. And sorry wrong section post
Anyway, a friend told me he saw somebody's benchmark screenshot on the dell xcd35 fb page with a score of 1590!!!!! Guy said he was using z19 so I opened a thread to see if anyone has used it
Hit THANKS if I helped u
Hmm. 1590 is sort of low compared to the scores on the new Kang builds. They're about 1700 with around 729 OC.
Sent from my Blade using XDA app
karthiknr said:
Hmm. 1590 is sort of low compared to the scores on the new Kang builds. They're about 1700 with around 729 OC.
Sent from my Blade using XDA app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really?????
I'm using BurgerZ build oc'd to 748 with Wbaw's kernel and I get 1450
How?
Hit THANKS if I helped u
IceCream_Sandwich said:
Really?????
I'm using BurgerZ build oc'd to 748 with Wbaw's kernel and I get 1450
How?
Hit THANKS if I helped u
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Higher graphics scores because of new adreno libs. But even before them I used to get good scores. Check this thread,I've posted screenshot.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1368507
Sent from my Blade using XDA app
karthiknr said:
Higher graphics scores because of new adreno libs. But even before them I used to get good scores. Check this thread,I've posted screenshot.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1368507
Sent from my Blade using XDA app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have the adreno200 libs too. I still get 1350-1450
Hit THANKS if I helped u
IceCream_Sandwich said:
I have the adreno200 libs too. I still get 1350-1450
Hit THANKS if I helped u
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
are u talking about antutu?
saaransh9 said:
are u talking about antutu?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No. Quadrant
Hit THANKS if I helped u
when my blade was fully working i used to get around 1.8 as a score with burgerz build
QuantumFoam said:
No. Quadrant
Hit THANKS if I helped u
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No wonder. I was talking about antutu.
Sent from my Blade using XDA app
Kannibalism said:
when my blade was fully working i used to get around 1.8 as a score with burgerz build
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1.8???????? Which benchmark software???
karthiknr said:
No wonder. I was talking about antutu.
Sent from my Blade using XDA app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So is Antutu the best?
Hit THANKS if I helped u
QuantumFoam said:
1.8???????? Which benchmark software???
So is Antutu the best?
Hit THANKS if I helped u
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Many people say Antutu is better than quadrant. I also believe it's better. But benchmarks keep varying and are not perfect on antutu as well.
Sent from my Blade using XDA app
karthiknr said:
Many people say Antutu is better than quadrant. I also believe it's better. But benchmarks keep varying and are not perfect on antutu as well.
Sent from my Blade using XDA app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Antutu gave me 1700
Quadrant 1450
Which to go on
Hit THANKS if I helped u
QuantumFoam said:
Antutu gave me 1700
Quadrant 1450
Which to go on
Hit THANKS if I helped u
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your antutu scores are good actually. The maximum I've got ever with my blade is 1710. Never exceeds that with any combination of mods. Moreover I don't overclock above 748.
Sent from my Blade using XDA app
I'm clocked to 748 too
Hit THANKS if I helped u
i use antutu to benchmark my device but like said before me i dont believe its accurate because it will always change on each run
Quadrant gave me same results on 3 runs
Hit THANKS if I helped u

Categories

Resources