I bought two used Nexus One dev editions and I discovered it runs Android 2.4 (The other one has a broken power button so I don't know how to hard reset it) How is it that it has 2.4? Is it Ice Cream Sandwich or Gingerbread?
GRH83.. That's Gingerbread, he probably edited the build.prop.
Interesting,
What does the QR code on the back link to, out of curiosity?
On the Nexus One, it's android.com/holidays which is a memory game, while on anything else it just redirects to android.com
Related
for any one interested.
"We're still coming down from the euphoria of introduction, but Dutch site Tweakers.net claims that Google's not entirely passing the torch to Honeycomb just yet -- beforehand, there's apparently another Gingerbread build in the cards. Having played with some sort of cobbled-together Sony Ericsson Xperia Arc with a 2.4 build, the site says that we can expect an incremental build that seems to feature miscellaneous stuff Google might not have had time to include in 2.3 -- random things like a new animation when deleting icons off the home screen, to much bigger features like visible video calling hooks. Unfortunately, said hooks didn't seem to be tied to any video calling-enabled Google Talk client, but considering how early this build seems to be, there's reason to believe they'll add it in by launch time. It's an open question when this is coming -- or to what devices -- and when you think about Eclair's progression from 2.0 to 2.1, it could happen sooner than you expect. "
Wow, it's like Deja Vu of last year
Eclair 2.1 - December 09
Eclair 2.1 - January 10
I could see the same thing happening:
Gingerbread 2.3 - December 10
Gingerbread 2.4 - January 11
I wonder what are the improvements though. I would predict the new Android music player or Gtalk Video calling
I think that is fake or something. It just doesn't add up. Sony has always been ages behind everyone else when it comes to android.... And wouldn't we be seeing 2.4 on nexus s before sony could even sniff the code for it?
Luxferro said:
I think that is fake or something. It just doesn't add up. Sony has always been ages behind everyone else when it comes to android.... And wouldn't we be seeing 2.4 on nexus s before sony could even sniff the code for it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe it is fake cuz really anyone could make their phone say anything
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Luxferro said:
I think that is fake or something. It just doesn't add up. Sony has always been ages behind everyone else when it comes to android.... And wouldn't we be seeing 2.4 on nexus s before sony could even sniff the code for it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sony indeed does that.
but i think sony is trying to fix that,with the upcoming devices.
the psp phone now runs 2.3 instead of the 2.1(on first leaked photos)
and we all know the chart with web visited 2.4 devices.(supposed to be honeycomb rumor.though honeycomb is officially 3.0)
androidpolice
Question, i know you can edit the build.prop to say what ever version number you would like but would that carry over to usage stats like in that article?
slowz3r said:
Question, i know you can edit the build.prop to say what ever version number you would like but would that carry over to usage stats like in that article?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sure. any website or server that tracks hits to their site can log the user agent info from each device. any rooted user can make their user agent and/or build.prop look like any device and platform it wants. to the outside world (server) it doesnt know the difference.
It's like I'm a ****ing psychic or something.
RogerPodacter said:
sure. any website or server that tracks hits to their site can log the user agent info from each device. any rooted user can make their user agent and/or build.prop look like any device and platform it wants. to the outside world (server) it doesnt know the difference.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In that case, i say we all edit our build.prop to show version 5.0 and pay some websites a visit
http://androinica.com/2011/01/06/android-2-4-is-real-might-be-incremental-might-be-ice-cream/
Images:
http://androinica.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/Arc-24.jpg
http://androinica.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/arc-242.jpg
http://androinica.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/arc-243.jpg
http://androinica.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/arc-244.jpg
Interesting, This goes along with the report I read that stated the 3.0, 3.1 android version are really going to be tablet version of phone 2.3 etc.
Thanks for the head up read
didn't 2.3 just come out like a month ago?
Why would they steal a design from Apple when Compiz is included with every major Linux distro? So Google concentrates and builds on Linux but looks to Apple for a dumbed down version of effects? Good gawd....
http://android-developers.blogspot.com/2011/01/android-30-platform-preview-and-updated.html
v0kal said:
http://android-developers.blogspot.com/2011/01/android-30-platform-preview-and-updated.html
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As of now this is all I would be interested in from 3.0 . Hope cyanogen can pull this into CM7
New types of connectivity: New APIs for Bluetooth A2DP and HSP let applications offer audio streaming and headset control. Support for Bluetooth insecure socket connection lets applications connect to simple devices that may not have a user interface.
Yep seems to be a preview SDK for 3.0 with a final SDK in coming weeks. Simply prep for Honeycomb tablets.
"A built-in GL renderer lets developers request hardware-acceleration of common 2D rendering operations in their apps, across the entire app or only in specific activities or views."
So it seems that 2.3 isn't hardware accelerated...now I want 3.0 on my desire . But here's another quote:
"Android 3.0 (Honeycomb) is a new version of the Android platform that is designed from the ground up for devices with larger screen sizes, particularly tablets."
So Honycomb isn't for phones? I really hope Google can clear things up a bit because I remember Andy rubben saying the Honycomb can adapt to phones & tablets.
Any thoughts or theories?
Weren't there enough thoughts and theories about it?
Jack_R1 said:
Weren't there enough thoughts and theories about it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes there was a lot of theories, but now we have something official to discuss rather than hearsay. Anyway, don't discuss if you don't feel like it.
How about the 2.4? really don't know what Goolge is thinking about. Just want a stable version and improve it by other works. Not so much version and make people confuse. It seems that N1 may not flash it~~
mr.r9 said:
Yes there was a lot of theories, but now we have something official to discuss rather than hearsay. Anyway, don't discuss if you don't feel like it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Looking at the new preview SDK, it only big screens by default. And reading through the platform highlights really only mentions tablets. However, a couple Android devs have already stated its for all platforms. Seems to me that they don't want to reveal that its for phones yet, so that they can advertise that it is made for tablets.
The main criticism the iPad got was being a giant iPhone. I think they want to avoid that by having people believe that it isn't the same Android that is on phones.
I guess when they release the full SDK we'll know for sure.
Interesting...the beat goes on!
Honeycomb is also for phones, but we all knew that right?
From the documentation:
Publishing your app for tablet-type devices only
Additionally, you should decide whether your application is for only tablet devices (specifically, xlarge devices) or for devices of all sizes that may run Android 3.0.
If your application is only for tablets (xlarge screens; not for mobile devices/phones), then you should include the <supports-screens> element in your manifest with all sizes except for xlarge declared false.
With this declaration, you indicate that your application does not support any screen size except extra large. External services such as Android Market may use this to filter your application from devices that do not have an extra large screen.
Otherwise, if you want your application to be available to both small devices (phones) and large devices (tablets), do not include the <supports-screens> element.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, all clear then! The future of Android looks neat!
Nice find
Sent from my Nexus One using XDA App
spamlucal said:
Honeycomb is also for phones, but we all knew that right?
From the documentation:
Well, all clear then! The future of Android looks neat!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmmmm...good find! Android is getting really interesting visually, which is IMO a milestone it needed to reach a while ago
Anyway, can't wait for an alpha sdk image on my phone to play with if that's possible currently
Forget Ginga and Honeycomb. Havent you all hear of whats ahead of honeycomb? Its called " Chicken Soup". Yup, ik... Weird name. But its only for dual core over 2ghz. So phones arent ready. Its suppose to be completely holographic 3d without glasses. Pretty neat. And requires horsepower of xbox 360 or more. Anything less and its a no go. Its suppose to be the next gen OS and quantum leap from even honeycomb. Remember the name "chicken soup". Its comming next year by christman. Cant wait!
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
SINNN said:
Forget Ginga and Honeycomb. Havent you all hear of whats ahead of honeycomb? Its called " Chicken Soup". Yup, ik... Weird name. But its only for dual core over 2ghz. So phones arent ready. Its suppose to be completely holographic 3d without glasses. Pretty neat. And requires horsepower of xbox 360 or more. Anything less and its a no go. Its suppose to be the next gen OS and quantum leap from even honeycomb. Remember the name "chicken soup". Its comming next year by christman. Cant wait!
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This was a horrible and incredibly illogical troll/joke attempt
spamlucal said:
Honeycomb is also for phones, but we all knew that right?
From the documentation:
Well, all clear then! The future of Android looks neat!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It actually does not mean much.
Android application could always define different layouts for different resolutions, orientations, themes or screen sizes. So, it is just one additional form factor, one of many. And the way to say to the market which layouts are supported and which are not.
It also does not mean, that "honeycomb for phones" would be the same as honeycomb for tablets "just smaller".
They only said, that phone version will move in similar direction. Which can mean pretty much anything.
In fact I expect, that honeycomb for phones will be seriously different, since a lot of new honeycomb for tablets features on smaller screens do not make any sense.
My theory:
Honeycomb is currently, Tablets only.
We are going to see a division in Android for Phones and Android for Tablets.
Tablets will be at 3.0 starting off.
Phones are currently at 2.3, and will continue 2.4 being Gingerbread as well with updates that should have happened with 2.3. (Like 2.0 and 2.1 being Eclair)
Once phones have the ability to run such a resource hungry operating system(3.0) the Phone and Tablet versions of Android will merge into one.
Wisefire said:
My theory:
Honeycomb is currently, Tablets only.
We are going to see a division in Android for Phones and Android for Tablets.
Tablets will be at 3.0 starting off.
Phones are currently at 2.3, and will continue 2.4 being Gingerbread as well with updates that should have happened with 2.3. (Like 2.0 and 2.1 being Eclair)
Once phones have the ability to run such a resource hungry operating system(3.0) the Phone and Tablet versions of Android will merge into one.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But the hardware of the new tablets is the same Tegra 2 of the new phones, so I think the problem is the adaptability of the OS to smaller screens in a way it is usable for our fingers.
Anyone here used the leaked "honeycomb music player"? It has all the new characteristics we saw on the xoom tablet but worked very nice on my Nexus One with 2.2.1.
I think when honeycomb's source code come out we will get working builds.
Sent from my Nexus One using XDA App
I heard Ice cream is going to be only for refrigerators. You know cause of the thermostat API that very few phones support.
marlonbr said:
But the hardware of the new tablets is the same Tegra 2 of the new phones, so I think the problem is the adaptability of the OS to smaller screens in a way it is usable for our fingers.
Anyone here used the leaked "honeycomb music player"? It has all the new characteristics we saw on the xoom tablet but worked very nice on my Nexus One with 2.2.1.
I think when honeycomb's source code come out we will get working builds.
Sent from my Nexus One using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I believe you are absolutely right. I tried making an AVD for Honeycomb with the screen resolution of my Nexus One. The launcher force closed continuously but you could see that the standard pull down notification bar was there. So I take that to mean that Honeycomb is for all devices and just changes its layout based on screen size.
draugaz said:
It actually does not mean much.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A little bit of context: The text I copy-pasted is in a section called "Upgrade or Develop a New App for Tablets and Similar Devices"
In it, is says:
If you want to develop something truly for tablet-type devices running Android 3.0, then you need to use new APIs available in Android 3.0. This section introduces some of the new features that you should use.
The first thing to do when you create a project with the Android 3.0 preview is set the <uses-sdk> element to use "Honeycomb" for the android:minSdkVersion.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What does this mean? it means this app won't work on anything other lower than honeycomb. So, the "choose your screen size" text I pasted yesterday applies to honeycomb-only apps.
The documentation in the SDK is a nice read actually
If you have played with the honeycomb emulator in the Android SDK, you might of been disapointed that it looked like honeycomb was only for tablets, but an insider at HTC has leaked some info about the new HTC Revolver, allegedly shipping with honeycomb. this is great news hopefully meaning google are working on a smartphone version of homneycomb aswell
http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/14/htc-revolver-a-flagship-honeycomb-phone-for-atandt/
The next version of Android after Honeycomb is reportedly merging Honeycomb and regular android together according to Eric Shmidt at MWC
http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2011-02/16/android-honeycomb-and-gingerbread-to-merge
I have a Dell inspiron one all in one 23 in touch screen desk top, is there a way to dual boot honey comb on it? It would be sick considering its basically a giant tablet.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Umm well im not sure how much you know about computers?... But the fact that android is built for arm processors should give it away that its practically impossible. But hell, if you can extract all of the honeycomb source code from a system dump and then completely rewrite the code to be desktop compatible, more power to you.
Short story: Its right next to impossible.
edit: then again I remember seeing Android 2.1 I think on a computer but it was hardly functional and the guy doing it put thousands of hours in.
Hmm, well I don't know that much about the Android system design, but I was under the impression it is mainly a java vm running on top of the linux kernel. If this is the case, and the linux kernel is serving as an abstraction layer, then it would at least seem slightly more likely.
Well I recall reading on engadget a little while ago about a new os called blue stacks that's supposed to mimic android on windows. I dont think they mentioned a specific build like Gb or Hc, but its supposed to be released at the end of the year.
Just a thought, I was sitting infront of my comp playing with Hc on my nook and thought it would be sick if I could make it run Hc.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
This would be awesome.
Sent from my Incredible with the XDA Premium App.
sagerox said:
I have a Dell inspiron one all in one 23 in touch screen desk top, is there a way to dual boot honey comb on it? It would be sick considering its basically a giant tablet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not right now. Probably sometime in the future for a future version of android which has either a source release or an official x86 version.
Unless you want to run the emulator... sorry, I mean crawl the emulator.
Keep an eye on this android-x86 site:
http://www.android-x86.org/
I haven't tried it but apparently they are up to Android 2.2 now. I did try an earlier version of Android running on a Netbook. That was from a different site called Live-Android which apparently is no longer active:
http://code.google.com/p/live-android/
Android-x86 can't really go beyond the versions of Android for which source has been released through AOSP; right now that means Gingerbread. It's not clear if Honeycomb source will ever be released, or if the next AOSP source dump would be for Ice Cream or beyond.
Nice. Too bad they haven't ported to a touch screen desk top though. I'm going to hit then up and ask if they have thought about it yet.
I just googled blue stacks, it's going to allow running android apps on windows. There won't be any access to the market until someone comes up with a mod. It doesn't look like they are attempting to address touch screen desk tops, only windows tablets.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Check out the blue stacks article on android central. They didn't mention touch screen desk tops, but I'm sure they will address them.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
I could only imagine seeing Android on a desktop full fledged.
I'm running Bluestacks on my Dell Inspiron One and it's working great with the apps installed. Now that ICS source is released I'm curious if the Android-x86 Project might be able to support this. I came here to see if anyone had any luck getting something up and running on it.
Jason_V said:
I'm running Bluestacks on my Dell Inspiron One and it's working great with the apps installed. Now that ICS source is released I'm curious if the Android-x86 Project might be able to support this. I came here to see if anyone had any luck getting something up and running on it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep. Haven't tried it myself but ICS for x86 is out. http://j.mp/rK7DHr
---------------------------------
Sent from my LG Optimus V using Tapatalk