Database Users

Pocket Hack Master & running the Universal @ 624 Mhz

Pocket Hack Master runs the Jasjar version of the HTC Universal @ 624 Mhz with no apparent problems. It passes the stress test at this setting and runs video at this setting. I've noticed that when running video, Pocket Hack Master's processor use utility doesn't completely max out when the processor speed is set @ 624 Mhx and that (as others have noted) running video slower than 624 Mhz results in noticeable frame rate slowness.
Since it's only rated to run @ 520 Mhz, I'm wondering if running it @ 624 Mhz will shorten the processor life or cause more serious problems. The only definitive way to know would be to run long-term on the Universal @ 624 Mhz.
Can anything think of a way besides running a long-term test to determine if damage is being done to the Uni's processor by running it @ 624 Mhz?

I too am interested in this. What do people advise running at, at most?

PS: On my Xda Exec it fails the 624 test each time, only 520 works.

I also have the same problem - it fails the 620mhz test

mine freezes @ 624, ocasionally. Not very usable, and quite annoying. I do see the difference in performance, but it crashes too often to be true :roll:
Tried Latest XCPUSCALAR my screen goes mad, and crazy, also unusable. UNFORTUNATELY :evil:

Hmm weird, my XDA Exec runs just fine a 624 MHz in Pocket Hack Master wonder why some people are having problems...

Yeah mine has been fine @624 for two days no glitches at all mines a T-Mobile MDA Pro

mine is now approaching 3 weeks at this speed and its fine !!! TBH the CPU will be running a little warmer, because you are asking more of it !! but its not as if you are putting extra voltage into it or anything so the chances of it blowing or miniscule !! if it gets unhappy it will just lock up. any here are the settings I used in PHM
I left all the timings of every thing as normal but pushed the multiplier up 1 more to 624 MHZ if I try 2 more (728 MHZ) it crashes before it even begins the burn in stability test :shock: suffice to say all the timings are identical to a genuine intel 624 MHZ CPU
Using Anton Tomov's pocket hackmaster version 2005
L = 16
N = 06
A = 01
Turbo enabled
half turbo disabled (dunno what the point of a half turbo is, it just seems to halve CPU speed)
LCD_26 = 00 (dunno what this does but seems to have no effect)
Fast Bus enabled
after adding it dont forget to set as favourite and then you can enable the speed
using the above settings should give you this
CPU = 624
BUS = 208
RAM = 104
LCD = 104
Turbo enabled
SI (speed index) now 373 up from 341
MIPS (millions of instructions per second) now 261 up from 217
Memory (even though I did not overclock the memory bus) now 486 up from 465
as stated 1 more step to 728 MHZ is a no go, and if you try to decrease the bus speed and up the multiplier to get speeds in-between 624 and 728, it starts suffering from bottlenecking and is not worth it if you look at the actual stats of data rate (MIPS memory etc) despite the higher figure of CPU MHZ its actually running slower the other drawback to strange bus speeds is that screen begins to flicker

guys I apologise in advance for my dumb question : but where do I get the Pocket Hack Master;
or in fact where is a good source for progs and utilities for WM5 (I am new to this OS and platform) ???
I would appreciate your help and any directions!

im getting sick of xda pda.
i have xda,xda ll,xda lls & xda lli
i find all those pda r junk and useless.
gave me too much problem.
i even loose my business because of this useless pda

unknown_macuser said:
im getting sick of xda pda.
i have xda,xda ll,xda lls & xda lli
i find all those pda r junk and useless.
gave me too much problem.
i even loose my business because of this useless pda
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im sorry but if you were foolish enough to not have a backup of business critical data then you none other than yourself to blame !!! next time use this
http://www.sunnysoft.cz/en_clanek.php?clanekid=51
It is brilliant, I used it myself today and strongly recommend it

How fast is Galaxy S2 Wireless N?

I have just got a new broadband contract with O2, here in the UK.
I have a wireless Box IV (4 in roman numerals) which supports wireless N.
My phone is connecting to this wireless box at 65mbps. I had expected it to connect significantly faster, because wirelss N supports up to 300mbps.
Can anyone tell me what the fastest wifi N signal available on the phone is?
Thanks!
James

Mine is consistent @ 65Mbps also.

Never seen mine higher than 65 mbps.
Using an AP D-Link DAP 2553 (Wifi N 300 mbps max) at 2.4 GHz

As far as I know the fastest available Wireless N-chip on any phone is 65mbps. If what I've read is correct this is because phones only have 1 WiFi antenna and speeds higher than 65mbps requires multiple antennas (google "MIMO").

is the galaxy s 2 Draft-N or 5.0GHZ N ?

Thanks guys. Ok, it's good to know it's not a problem with something.

blickmanic said:
is the galaxy s 2 Draft-N or 5.0GHZ N ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't understand your question, SGS2 is dual band (2.4GHz N and 5.0 GHz N).
N-draft is gone since a long time ago, the N-draft standard was approved so basically all units sold as N draft is also "pure" N. But support for 5 GHz is always optional.

65mbps also.

Maximum AC wifi link speed?

I've been searching for a while and i just cant seem to find the answer. I just upgraded from an AC 1200 to an AC 1900 router. My note 4's wifi link speed on the AC 1200 maxed out at 867 mb/s. on 5ghz which is the max for AC 1200.
Now with the new router it still only connects at 867mb/s and not the max link speed the new AC 1900 router should provide.
I know it dosent matter, has nothing to do with why i bought the router and is plenty fast enough... but it's bugging me.
I just want to know if the N4 tops out at 867mb/s? Has anyone gotten anything higher for a link speed?
thanks!!

I certainly haven't gotten anything higher than that with my RT-AC87 and my Note 4. Only topped out at 700-something Mbps while being in the same room as the router itself.
Usually, the bandwidth numbers on these routers are inflated for marketing reasons anyway. Sometimes they mash together the total theoretical bandwidth for the 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz bands, sometimes they assume you're using 3x3 clients (I'm pretty sure the Note 4 and most other smartphones and laptops are just 2x2), and sometimes they conveniently ignore the fact that Wi-Fi is an inherently half-duplex connection (transmit OR receive, not both, so your bandwidth's halved for bidirectional communication).

Your new router is probably only a dual band. Two channels of 433 Mbs. = 867Mbs. I have a Nighthawk Tri Band router which will combine 3 channels to allow 1.3Gbs. However I have no devices that support triband connections. My Surface Pro 3 and Samsung Tab S only connect at 867Mbs. Even the new Note 5 specs say Dual Band for the .AC radio spec. I haven't seen any new phones with a Triband spec yet.

S6 Lite 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi issue

After extensive troubleshooting with my ISP's highest level tech support (I escalated my issue to the highest level) and ultimately swapping my Arris XB6 router/modem with a brand new one with a different chipset, my S6 Lite attains atrocious 2.4 GHz speeds.
Before people lecture me on how I should be using 5 GHz only, the fact is I usually can't because of physical limitations such as concrete walls, congestion, and and distance. What's interesting is how when connected to 5 GHz, speeds are fantastic and mirror other devices including my laptops, mobile devices such as iPhone/iPads, and even a wired ethernet connection to the desktop.
However, things quickly go to **** when using 2.4 GHz. I exchanged my S6 Lite and it's still doing the same. I tested it out in another area using a different AP with a different ISP using only 2.4 GHz and I got the same result.
When using other devices including new or legacy devices, they all kick the S6 Lite's butt in terms of speed. While I can often only achieve 6 -10 Mbps with the Lite, I get close to 70 Mbps on other devices and even with an old Nexus 7 2013 I get close to 40 Mbps, but not with the Samsung - connected to 2.4 GHz.
Using Wi-Fi spectrum analyzers signal strength and speeds are all awesome. I have a signal of around -37 dBm when on either 20 or 40 MHz channel bandwidth. I tend to get slightly faster speeds on my Lite via 20 instead of 40 Mhz. Channels are manually selected as Auto gives the worst possible speeds.
As such, I have come to accept this is Wi-Fi is an issue with the Lite and an not a defect per se. It's engineered this way. My question is though, how and why? Does Samsung use two different radios or "network" cards on the motherboard? And if anything, shouldn't the 5 GHz spectrum suffer before the 2.4 GHz? From past experience using Android TV Boxes, my issues have always typically been when connected to 5 GHz.

Nintendo Switch WiFi Bandwidth much lower than hardware limit

I am looking for some techincal thoughts on this issue since the Nintendo community and support agents don't know enough hardware or software to help me find the root of the issue.
I have a V1 Nintendo Switch which appears to have a BCM4356XKUBG Broadcomm WiFi + Bluetooth IC inside that has a max theoretical data rate of 867 Mbps. However, despite having the maximum MTU, extremely low latency DNS servers specified, having the router's and the switch's antenna array less than 3 inches away from one another with line of sight, using an open channel on 5 GHz WifI (scanned it using Inssider)...I still cannot break 60 Mbps with a reliable 350 Mbps wireless signal confirmed by 3 devices at a similar distance.
Any thoughts or ideas? Is Nintendo possibly limiting the bandwidth in firmware?