Quadrant Scores - Xperia Arc General

Given the various opinions on their phone's performance I thought it would be interesting to see what people are getting.
To test install Quadrant standard and run the full benchmark then post here. Mine for my phone which is horrendously laggy with with Good Technologies email app open that I require for corporate email is:
Rooted and unbloated: Yes
Score: 1268
Region/Rom: Not sure
Launcher: Go

1558, running generic LT15a rom, unrooted, nothing removed..

1674, running generic lt15a rom.184, unrooted bloatware removed, stock launcher

1692 rooted and slimmed down.
Sent from a Galaxy (Tab) far, far away....

Just ran a full benchmark => 1284, although I've gotten 1300 and 1500+ once. The norm on my phone seems to be ~1300
Not rooted, nothing removed, stock launcher LT15i 3.0.A.2.181

mine
Rooted and unbloated: Yes
Score: 1308
Region/Rom: .181 global
Launcher: Launcher Pro

All the details are in the Signature
LauncherPro and bunch of frozen apps in TB.
EDIT: Just ran again and got 1534 !!

1555 on generic UK Vodafone firmware, not rooted and with bloatware still on device.

1646
generic untouched Rogers

1581 Stock rogers with root.

Here's mine:
Rooted: Yes
Unbloated: No
Score: 1680
Ver: 3.0.a.2.184
Launcher: Launcher Pro
Re-Ran with different launcher;
Rooted: Yes
Unbloated: No
Score: 1794
Ver: 3.0.a.2.184
Launcher: SPB3D Shell

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

How your arc reaches that far while im getting 1368?
wut.

Score: 1354
Rooted: No
Unbloated: No
ROM/Region: Rogers Lt15a
Launcher: Stock

First 1398
Then after stopping a lot of apps in the background 1541
Rooted and removed a lot of SE stuff

Model: LT15i
Only Root with gingerbreak
Stock Kernal (ends with 181)
Score: First time: 1271, Sec. 1570, Third. 1531.

1329 first try 2nd 1588
rogers arc with g181 rom
rooted and removed bloatware

Oh now i did it right
Rooted: Yes
Unbloated: No
Score: 1630
Ver: 3.0.A.2.181

Rooted: yes
Bloatware: frozen
Ver: 3.0.A.2.181
Using Launcher pro
Score: 1600
Sent from my LT15i

Related

[RESEARCH] Benchmark Stats

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Let's make a research about which is the best combination (Rom/Homescreen App...) on Xperia X8.
You can see you phone's score results by downloading and installing the "Quandrant Standard" from the market.
Mesure your score a few times and then provide the range of your results (ex. 350-360).
Every one can post it's phone score. You can provide a screenshoot too.
Please, reply writing the information i give:
====================
Model: E15i
System: stock, 2.1.1.A.0.6
Homescreen App: Launcher Pro
JIT: Enabled
SetCPU: Enabled
Score: 482-510
====================
You can see your system and model from your phone settings and from Quandrant Standard too.
I you do no have or you do not know what JIT and SetCPU are just do not write then or put "Disabled" where i write "Enable".
We can take some info from here too.
Tell me if and how we can expand the research.
=========Results (until 8/3/2011)=========
1. as-mario :E15i-MiniCM-LP-J|E--SPU|D --> 780-1123
2. stevicc : E15i-Floyo(Racht-v0.15)-LP-J|D-SCPU|D --> 1100
3. GreatApo : E15i-Stock|2.1.1-LP-J|E-SCPU|E --> 482-510
4. Darkthanos : E15i-Stock|2.1.1-LP-J|D-SCPU|D --> 470
========================================
i use racht´s Floyo rom v0.15 and my score in quadrant is about 1100.
stevicc said:
i use racht´s Floyo rom v0.15 and my score in quadrant is about 1100.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Added... yeap, floyo is much better... do you use Jit or SetCPU? any spesific launcher?
I use only default settings and default launcher is LauncherPro.
Sent from my X8 using XDA App
Score 470 on stock se rom 2.1 update 1
with launcher pro, no jit, no set cpu
My biggest on mini cm is 1123 with no apps airplane mod 70 mb of ram free jit and launcherpro
my smallest was somewhere between 780

Quadrant Benckmark Results on Stock JB 4.1.1

My TF300T has been suffering from many problems like random reboots, freezing and showing the app not responding popup, low fps in games, etc.
I would like to know if my tablet is faulty, or I should just void the warranty and install a custom rom.
These are my quadrant benchmark results (after a reboot, performance mode):
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
The IO results are really horrible here, and I think its the main cause of the slow performance on this tablet. (Even my 1st gen Kindle Fire gets 2263 for IO)
FYI, I have already done a factory reset after updating to JB.
Can other users on Stock JB post their Quadrant Benchmark Results here too? I want to see if my benchmark result is normal.
EDIT: I just did a factory reset (again), and the results improved by a little bit. Is this the best I can get without unlocking the bootloader?
At first i did not want to unlock my tablet, but i couldn't live with the terrible i/o.
I unlocked the device and installed [email protected] rom. The tablet is flying.
Look at the quadrant results, that's all i can say.
with the new OC Version I get about 6400 on Quadrant
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1901784
archspijkenisse said:
At first i did not want to unlock my tablet, but i couldn't live with the terrible i/o.
I unlocked the device and installed [email protected] rom. The tablet is flying.
Look at the quadrant results, that's all i can say.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
mikaole said:
with the new OC Version I get about 6400 on Quadrant
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1901784
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks, I have decided to unlock my tablet.. i'll try The Ultra Fast Rom - JB Overclock Edition V02 !
i dont quite like the modified icons in the @blue rom..
Strange, check this out http://db.tt/G5a2UqLW I got over 3k on stock Samsung ICS, did the JB update brakes the I/O?
Wysyłane z mojego ASUS Transformer Pad TF300T za pomocą Tapatalk 2
This is my quadrant scrores (data partition is mounted to mmcblk1p2 aka sdcard second partiton, sadly these result are still with the slow class 6 card, because i get extreme pro card next week) And cpu is 1.8ghz

[BENCHMARKS] Post Your Results

I am hereby Making a Benchmark thread for our U8800Pro.
According to me this results will help us decide what is the most fast and stable ROM till date.
So be free and post your benchmarks here.
Example:-
ROM used-ShenduOS-4.1.2-121228-Dev
Mods used-
*KickAssKernel script
*V6SuperCharger script(Zeppelinrox)
*Seeder Entropy 2.0
*Adrenaline Injector(by me)
CPU Frequency used-
1805Ghz
AnTuTu-
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Quadrant-
That was just an example you can use any of the two Softwares Antutu or quadrant as per your choice.
This is not for competition purposes
-Rik[Rittik]
keep in mind that benchmarks don't show real world performance.You can have a great score and the rom being buggy as hell at the same time..!
u 8800-51 divice with SheDu pro v2.0.4
CPU Frequency 1600, guvernator - ondemand
no lag no bug
the best antutu benckmark is mine with my rom, my benckmark is 6630 with 1804 mhz but i have not the screen because i do that benchkmark in the past
pointless thread.with all the respect.this is something like show me your homescreen to tell which rom is the best.
Highest benchmark does not mean faster or more stable ROM.
Sent from my U8800Pro using Tapatalk 2
I told stable.. Even 4.2.2 is stable but has many issues.. Stability doesnt depend upon bugs it depends on kernels(i may be wrong). Even b929 is unstable with Geno's earlier kernel multiple reboots..
There are roms which are stable but not fit for everyday use
-Rik[Rittik]
Baydu Yi 2.1
Hello, my result:
ROM used: CuvettoJB v 1.2
CPU Frequency used: 1805Ghz
Testing app AnTuTu.
Score: 6181
Sent from my U8800Pro using xda app-developers app
Sent from my U8800pro using Tapatalk 2
Hello, my result:
ROM used: CuvettoJB v 1.2
CPU Frequency used: 1405Ghz
Testing app AnTuTu.
Score: 5317
with SwapIt Expander I have almost no reboot at all (1-2 at week) :victory:
ROM 929 by Nikitines
SD 4Gb 6 Class
I/O !!!!!!

[Q] AnTuTu score 45000+ on NOTE 3 with the latest STOCK ROM DBT. Is it possible ???

Hello,
Quoting one man:
I deliberately asked a neighbor about his Note 3 which has in drawer as a spare phone. He do factory settings and AnTuTu test and lo and behold 47486 for the latest stock DBT.
Now the question? Is it really possible to achieve such AnTuTu score on this Stock ROM?
It would also please me wonder:
I Wonder how You Have Achieved the Highest score in Antutu v5.1.5 with Stock ROM or Custom ROM with Stock kernel (and still with knox 0x0) in Note 3?
Please write only results Greater than 43000.
Thank you.
Have a nice day
Andrew Gale.
wietter said:
Hello,
Quoting one man:
I deliberately asked a neighbor about his Note 3 which has in drawer as a spare phone. He do factory settings and AnTuTu test and lo and behold 47486 for the latest stock DBT.
Now the question? Is it really possible to achieve such AnTuTu score on this Stock ROM?
It would also please me wonder:
I Wonder how You Have Achieved the Highest score in Antutu v5.1.5 with Stock ROM or Custom ROM with Stock kernel (and still with knox 0x0) in Note 3?
Please write only results Greater than 43000.
Thank you.
Have a nice day
Andrew Gale.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here hava a look at this
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Im rooted and on stock kitkat
CM13 got over 60K score on latest antutu..
stonedead said:
CM13 got over 60K score on latest antutu..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's impressive
Yes it is possible I have gotten around 53k with stock
Yes it's possible, before i install any modification, i score 45k on my n900.
And now i score 55k with custom rom!

Tangerine ≥10 - XSP versions affected by 1.4 GHZ bug vs. XSP versions free this bug

Tangerine ≥10 - XSP versions affected by 1.4 GHZ bug vs. XSP versions free this bug
I'm trying to narrow the source of the infamous 1.4 Ghz scale CPU issue. For those who are not experience this, I will explain: on Tangerine ≥10 kernel versions, the CPU won't scale over 1458 Mhz. It works just fine on stock kernel or Tangerine pre-version 10.
I've erased and format everything, even removed the SD-card, fresh install of CM 12.1 and a few custom ROM that were reported as working nice with T-Kernel ≥10... not a change, it won't go over 1.4 Ghz. I'm trying to figure out what's causing this wild behavior, it might be the device subversion. So, please post your Xperia SP version and what's your case - it's your Tangerine (versions ≥10) allows for CPU frequencies over 1458 Mhz? Thank you!
C5303 14W07 TYPE: PM-0350-BV NOT WORKING
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
varioventus said:
I'm trying to narrow the source of the infamous 1.4 Ghz scale CPU issue. For those who are not experience this, I will explain: on Tangerine ≥10 kernel versions, the CPU won't scale over 1458 Mhz. It works just fine on stock kernel or Tangerine pre-version 10.
I've erased and format everything, even removed the SD-card, fresh install of CM 12.1 and a few custom ROM that were reported as working nice with T-Kernel ≥10... not a change, it won't go over 1.4 Ghz. I'm trying to figure out what's causing this wild behavior, it might be the device subversion. So, please post your Xperia SP version and what's your case - it's your Tangerine (versions ≥10) allows for CPU frequencies over 1458 Mhz? Thank you!
C5303 14W07 TYPE: PM-0350-BV NOT WORKING
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's happening with me too
@varioventus this is an old thread but I want to write this anyway. The issue appears only when using the "clean L2 frequency table".
The difference between the label on your SP and mine (on which the issue doesn't exist) is that on the right side I see:
Model: C5303
14W18
SI: 1272-2536
There's something different in the hardware. It's the only explanation!

Categories

Resources