Today , I saw on a newspaper this breaking new: Google is going to release an rom called: Ice Cream Sandwich.(This is not a hoax or a joke , It's true 100%)
According to this,Ice Cream Sandwich will work for ALL android phones. The point is that it will have all the features of Android Honeycomb. (They will release in September 2011)
I am not holding my breath on generalized articles till more specifics are available. Apparently, it contains Honeycomb's holographic UI, and, if it does indeed contain eye candy like that, there's a very slim chance it will work like its completely meant to on a Non GPU and ARMv6 phone like the Wildfire.
Not saying that ICS will / may never be seen on the Wildfire. It probably will come, because, it will be open source, unlike Honeycomb. (PS - This applies only if Wildfire devs remain till then. The way devs are abandoning the Wildfire and upgrading to other devices is a bit scary for the already short future of the Wildfire)
Lastly, this is good news for Wildfire owners who own rootable phones. Nothing for those with newer S-ON HBoots.
Also, this doesnt belong here. This post cannot be 'Dev Related' in anyway I see it.
They didn't tell that it will work on ALL devices. They wrote on MOST of today's devices, which are probably only the usual high-end-well-known devices. I guess low-end devices like Wildfire will not manage to run it....
mtnhan1996 said:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I`m trying to quote but I only get this.... what does it all mean????!!!???
Cool... ice cream, tastes nice.
mtnhan1996 said:
Today , I saw on a newspaper this breaking new: Google is going to release an rom called: Ice Cream Sandwich.(This is not a hoax or a joke , It's true 100%)
According to this,Ice Cream Sandwich will work for ALL android phones. The point is that it will have all the features of Android Honeycomb. (They will release in September 2011)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
WOW really, I think everybody already knows about Ice Cream Sandwich for months now.........
Lets wait and see ...
ramdroid77 said:
They didn't tell that it will work on ALL devices. They wrote on MOST of today's devices, which are probably only the usual high-end-well-known devices. I guess low-end devices like Wildfire will not manage to run it....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They DID say that it work on ALL devices
Here is few information about it http://gizmodo.com/5800358/what-is-androids-ice-cream-sandwich
Kind of 3D on Wildfire that going to use OpenGL headtracking i doubt it
simple question for simple answer:
so will it work on wildfire or not?
vilks said:
simple question for simple answer:
so will it work on wildfire or not?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don`t have my crystal ball with me, so I`ll go with low to no chances. Maybe a laggy port at most.
Like it was stated before, there are some hardware requirements for the holographic interface that requires a GPU, which the Wildfire doesn't have. However I think Icecream will run like on most other phones which are supported on xda (hence they usually have a GPU on board)
It's fine for me. I'm gonna have my Xoom soon and see all the fancy stuff, and by the time Icecream is available I could slowly think about replacing my Wildfire...
ramdroid77 said:
Like it was stated before, there are some hardware requirements for the holographic interface that requires a GPU, which the Wildfire doesn't have. However I think Icecream will run like on most other phones which are supported on xda (hence they usually have a GPU on board)
It's fine for me. I'm gonna have my Xoom soon and see all the fancy stuff, and by the time Icecream is available I could slowly think about replacing my Wildfire...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Heard good things about zoom, enjoy
Sent from my HTC Wildfire using Tapatalk
This is great news
Sent from my HTC Wildfire using XDA App
guys, forget about this hype.... it's just a misinterpretation and it seems everyone is believing it....
Froyo, Gingerbread were also possible to run on any device.... are they available on every phone? NO!
Is Gingerbread officially available for Wildfire? NO!
Will it be officially available for Wildfire soon? NO!
So how come you expect Icecream to be released for Wildfire in any way??? Like written before there will be a custom ROM at best, but due to the missing GPU it will probably suck!
[And please keep in mind: like it was written in another recent thread recently you can't just activate the missing hardware by adding a software driver]
It will probably suck.... yeah yeah.... that's what you guys said when Gingerbread was out. And guess what? The devs proved you wrong. It may have a kind of fallback mode for slow devices.
You're right pal!
Even now I'm still suck with Stock ROM.
All I expect now just able to root it again or looking for another higher spec.
ramdroid77 said:
guys, forget about this hype.... it's just a misinterpretation and it seems everyone is believing it....
Froyo, Gingerbread were also possible to run on any device.... are they available on every phone? NO!
Is Gingerbread officially available for Wildfire? NO!
Will it be officially available for Wildfire soon? NO!
So how come you expect Icecream to be released for Wildfire in any way??? Like written before there will be a custom ROM at best, but due to the missing GPU it will probably suck!
[And please keep in mind: like it was written in another recent thread recently you can't just activate the missing hardware by adding a software driver]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They said that It would work on every devices dude, that's why it's different from honeycomb.
That's the reason why I said it was a great new
mtnhan1996 said:
They said that It would work on every devices dude, that's why it's different from honeycomb.
That's the reason why I said it was a great new
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are missing his point. Google said it will work, but, the end decision rests on HTC, which is what he was trying to point out.
ramdroid77 said:
Is Gingerbread officially available for Wildfire? NO!
Will it be officially available for Wildfire soon? NO!
So how come you expect Icecream to be released for Wildfire in any way??? Like written before there will be a custom ROM at best, but due to the missing GPU it will probably suck!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
mtnhan1996 said:
They said that It would work on every devices dude, that's why it's different from honeycomb.
That's the reason why I said it was a great new
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@mtnhan1996 . Seems like u r thinking ice-cream will be officially ported to wildfire (skipping the official gingerbread update). ---------- NO, it will never happen.
And official updates do not just depend on the google's statements. They depend on the device brand to a large extent. That is why GOOGLE branded devices will be updated much earlier and brands like SE will have late/no updates.
And one more thing to recollect is we didn't even had a non-buggy gingerbread sense custom rom yet. And we cant expect htc to give an os update to wildfire without newer htc sense. So, no way with the official update.
Related
Today Xperia blog posted that SE UK officially announced that there will be no froyo or gingerbread released for X10 family
Source
http://www.xperiax10.net/2011/01/06...-will-not-receive-upgrade-to-froyo-or-beyond/
sharathx10 said:
Today Xperia blog posted that SE UK officially announced that there will be no froyo or gingerbread released for X10 family
Source
http://www.xperiax10.net/2011/01/06...-will-not-receive-upgrade-to-froyo-or-beyond/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
TADA: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=902414
It is so obvious
Android 2.2 and above has the option of installing apps on SD card, phone with 2.2 dosent require 1GB of internal memory. SE designed this so as to support till 2.1
This is awesome!!!!!!!!!
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
If you remember the phone came out before froyo was announced. You can't accuse them of not designing the phone for something that didn't exist at the time.
Having said that, it isn't an excuse for not supporting froyo. Everyone knows it can handle it. Heck, there are custom Roms lol
Sent from my X10a using XDA App
pngface said:
If you remember the phone came out before froyo was announced. You can't accuse them of not designing the phone for something that didn't exist at the time.
Having said that, it isn't an excuse for not supporting froyo. Everyone knows it can handle it. Heck, there are custom Roms lol
Sent from my X10a using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
HTC Magic wasn't designed for 1.6...nor 2.1...and it got officially updated to froyo:
http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2010/12/14/htc-magic-gets-froyo-on-vodafone-uk/
That ins't an excuse in my opinion, the new xperia mini is almost like our x10 and it will have froyo.
As i said in another thread, i'm wondering now what are those "great news" unknown13x was talking about...because i can't seem to find anything great apart from froyo or gingerbread... (knowing we will got MT and DLNA in the next update)
LOL i was right all along
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
Hey any of you remember this? This guy got flamed hardcore by SE believers.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=772523
Not starting a flame war again, but SE has been known to do this as I said in one of my posts in this thread. No surprise here.
sopdogg said:
Hey any of you remember this? This guy got flamed hardcore by SE believers.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=772523
Not starting a flame war again, but SE has been known to do this as I said in one of my posts in this thread. No surprise here.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it would seems like that guy is rite. perhaps he's from SE company. i wonder...
That's what he stated, he was a part of the DEV team. Other than spelling Xperia "experia", it seemed to me that he knew what he was talking about.
For those who haven't seen, SE UK posted this to their Twitter feed earlier:
http://twitter.com/#!/SonyEricssonUK/status/23028920475455488 said:
We believe the features included in the Android 2.1 phone are on par with, and in many cases better than, a vanilla installation of 2.2 #X10
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Idiots! They're getting flamed (rightly so) for it too.
Read through the SELeak thread again and laughed at all the smart folks here.
Just playing devil's advocate here, but nowhere have I seen SE state that the X10 series will get no more updates. Maybe they're skipping 2.2 in favor of 2.4?
nekkidtruth said:
Just playing devil's advocate here, but nowhere have I seen SE state that the X10 series will get no more updates. Maybe they're skipping 2.2 in favor of 2.4?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i think they said no froyo and onwards.
Hmm... I wonder where unknown13 is?
Lol maybe he didn't know about this either...
Or if he did, maybe he heard that there wasn't going to be a Froyo update and hence assumed that X10 will get gingerbread
my X10 is heavily used for exchange, gmail syncs and gaming. so i need to keep the os updated. well i guess i'll be selling my X10 very soon. unless we can get the hardware working off the AOSP mods and the darn bootloader
i've always liked SE phones but i think that's the last of it... HTC FTW
In Product blog
Rikard Skogberg says: January 6, 2011 at 5:22 pm
Hi all First – As a clarification regarding the current Xperia products –
We are planning another upgrade to bring new features (such as for example multi-touch for Xperia X10) to the current family of Xperia™ smartphones in Q1 2011.
However, at this stage those plans do not include updating the underlying Android version
This decision is based on that we believe that with the current hardware platform an overhaul of the underlying core OS wouldn’t drastically improve the user experience
We believe that the current Xperia range on Android 2.1 coupled with our proprietary upgrades and unique hardware delivers a user experience that is on par with, and in many cases better than, a vanilla installation of Android 2.2
Our priority right now is to keep enhancing the user experience of the existing products through coming updates and to deliver a fantastic range of smartphones in 2011 that are all on the latest possible version of Android – that is a target we are determined to hit! version of Android – that is a target we are determined to hit
Sent from my SO-01B using XDA App
sopdogg said:
That's what he stated, he was a part of the DEV team. Other than spelling Xperia "experia", it seemed to me that he knew what he was talking about.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For one, I know that while toying with the brand SE did use "Experia" at one point or another.
Some of those guys that gave him all that rot, should very seriously apologize in that thread.
Oh it is disappointing My eyes on Xperia Arc now
Based on the new 18 month upgrade rule Google is putting in place it seems like EVO is guaranteed to get Ice Cream Sandwich. Great news!!
Sorry if this was posted already, but I glanced the top post in General and didn't see this. Delete if duplicate.
I saw it on the I/O stream but here is Engadget mentioning it as well:
http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/10/google-partners-with-oems-and-carriers-to-guarantee-android-upda/
More details at Thisismynext:
http://thisismynext.com/2011/05/10/google-promises-android-devices-updates-18-months/
bparvin said:
Based on the new 18 month upgrade rule Google is putting in place it seems like EVO is guaranteed to get Ice Cream Sandwich. Great news!!
Sorry if this was posted already, but I glanced the top post in General and didn't see this. Delete if duplicate.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please post link to new rule.
It makes it easier to discuss the matter.
Edit: Thanks for the links.
Long as the hardware can handle it......
sgt. slaughter said:
Long as the hardware can handle it......
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is the only sticking point I can think. Unless they add more details/restrictions about customized versions as well.
I can't see why the EVO shouldn't meet the requirements for ICS (Ice Cream Sandwich) Unless they add some huge GPU related features that can't be shut off built directly into the OS.
This rule will only apply to devices that will launch from NOW going forward.
None of this 18 month rule stuff matters if you're already on AOSP. Our phone will get ICS if CM and others support it, guaranteed. The original motodroid has CM7... the EVO will live on!
Nice to see steps being taken - or attempting to do as such - in the right direction.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
also teams like Cyanogen Mod will port icecream to alot more devices then what google says will run it.
thegregbradley said:
None of this 18 month rule stuff matters if you're already on AOSP. Our phone will get ICS if CM and others support it, guaranteed. The original motodroid has CM7... the EVO will live on!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
dabbill said:
also teams like Cyanogen Mod will port icecream to alot more devices then what google says will run it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I enjoy the AOSP roms from CyangonMod and others but official releases just make those ROMs that much better.
yeah.. good step in the right direction
but...
it is for new phones and moving forward.. evo is not new.
LOOPHOLE: as hardware permits.. this is a huge veto card (and who makes that call)... 512kb RAM maybe an issue.
brown14you said:
This rule will only apply to devices that will launch from NOW going forward.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you read this or are you assuming? I haven't read that anywhere and didn't hear that during the live stream.
bparvin said:
Did you read this or are you assuming? I haven't read that anywhere and didn't hear that during the live stream.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you are right.. have not seen that in black and white....
but... i would bet it is only new released phones.
Ice cream looks like it will finally include HW acceleration. Honeycomb tablets are probably all Tegra 2 powered because of software compatibility. I think that ice cream will be very similar. Google said ice cream is comming later this year (fall I think), and with the N1 probably falling outside of 18 months old at that point, we might not see first gen Snapdragon/adreno support at all in AOSP/Android.
My guess is that Google will release a dumbed down version for low end phones and that'll be the version that CM ports over to older devices.
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk
Pretty sure Evo will get Ice Cream, they said no hardware requirements for it. And Evo is Sprints flagship phone still, pretty sure they are going to keep updating it until everyone can get a new phone.
Pretty sure Evo will get Ice Cream, they said no hardware requirements for it. And Evo is Sprints flagship phone still, pretty sure they are going to keep updating it until everyone can get a new phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Where did they say there's no hardware requirements? In fact, they said updates will come if the hardware permits. Thus hinting that there will be at least soft requirements.
BTW, by the time ice cream drops, the EVO will look like the G1.
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk
evo 3D and kingdom will be out by then.... and that would push evo off sprints top dog chair. before ice cream will be released in Q4.
I love my evo.. but i think 2.3 is as for officially it will go.
This will certainly kick ass, Sprint will most likely put the new OS onto the Evo because it is still one of the best phones on the market despite it being released for almost a year
You guys aren't reading....
The groups first move is to promise that that new Android devices from these partners will receive updates for 18 months after launch, pending hardware support, which is a great step towards addressing the problem of orphan devices.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my spaceship!
This just mad my day.
But yes, the evo may not get it, as it "technically" is an older device, so you'll have to wait on a port.
http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/10/google-clarifies-18-month-android-upgrade-program-details-far-f/
meaning YES ice cream for us
not neccessarily, samsung would have to opt into this by the looks of it
joey2cool2007 said:
not neccessarily, samsung would have to opt into this by the looks of it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Samsung is one of the subscribers of the deal...
that for sure only will start for new device which will come with Google Ice Cream Sandwich.
With more than 10 Million devices sold, I imagine that the Galaxy S will be part of the program.
Even though Samsung is in on the deal (which is not surprising), it's still ultimately up to the carriers for when and how Android versions are released on what devices.
Samsung is pretty much leading the charge when it comes to releasing updated versions of Android for their Galaxy S phones, as well as releasing the kernel source.
The problem is most carriers don't update the phones with Samsung's releases quick enough for some people, if ever. Here in Canada, we're still (officially) on 2.2 Froyo for the i9000m.
Here's another interesting article to support that claim.
http://www.techradar.com/news/phone...updates-for-galaxy-range-954260#ixzz1M0MvnVvT
I don't really care what the carriers do. Who sticks with crappy carrier roms anyway?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Ethische doesn't meander we het ice Cream.
I've seen the keynote live yesterday, he said all NEW devices would get it.
Well the galaxy s isn't "new" anymore.
Plus Ice Cream is supposed to come out in Q4.
Well that's more then 18 months from may (right?) last year.
So it's just hoping Samsung will be nice to us.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk
Damn Q4! I am BORED TO DEATH with Gingerbread already, i want something new IMMEDIATELY
I hope we get Ice Cream Sandwich for SGS. 18 month is a bit short consider most contract last for 24 months nowadays....
i like the cool name android produces...... but what the hell is an ice cream sandwich ??
i like ice cream, and i like sandwiches, but i would never mix the 2 together.
wouldnt this just be 2 slices of bread, with ice cream in the middle ??
surely this will make it all cold and soggy...
Americans will eat anything lol,
sorry for the off topic question
Ah well, released Feb 2011, Galaxy SL i9003 users have lot to enjoy in the 18 months timeframe... We'd have ICS but waiting 2 more months for GB is a torture!
Still, good of Samsung to join the program...
It takes samsung 18 month to update a phone so you will only get one update anyway
azzledazzle said:
i like the cool name android produces...... but what the hell is an ice cream sandwich ??
i like ice cream, and i like sandwiches, but i would never mix the 2 together.
wouldnt this just be 2 slices of bread, with ice cream in the middle ??
surely this will make it all cold and soggy...
Americans will eat anything lol,
sorry for the off topic question
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
An "Ice Cream Sandwich" does not contain any bread. It may just be too cold in pommie land to truly appreciate them.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
got-petrol said:
It takes samsung 18 month to update a phone so you will only get one update anyway
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Some people just like to distort the truth for effect.
I've had my SGS for a year and in that time I've gone from 2.1 to 2.2 to 2.2.1 and now to 2.3.
That is three updates in 12 months which is equivalent to one update every 4 months.
ooooh i know what they are lol
we dont call them 'ice cream sandwiches' over here lol,
as if anyone would eat ice cream and bread
I guess the 18 month timeframe covers android releases in that frame, not how long it takes the update to come through. So, guys stop ****ting about how long they take to release the updates.
azzledazzle said:
ooooh i know what they are lol
we dont call them 'ice cream sandwiches' over here lol,
as if anyone would eat ice cream and bread
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://www.followmefoodie.com/2010/06/singapore-ice-cream-sandwich/
^^ Delicious and only 1SGD
MrGreencastle said:
.... it's still ultimately up to the carriers for when and how Android versions are released on what .....
.....The problem is most carriers don't update the phones with Samsung's releases quick enough for some people, if ever....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This of course is very true. I'm always slightly surprised why people tolerate this situation. We choose a device running open source software because of the freedom it provides, then tolerate provider limitations and lock-downs. Mine was unbranded and unlocked when I got it and I wouldn't have it any other way
Sent from my GTI9000 using XDA App, gingerbread 2.2.3 jvh rooted, ADW launcher + gingerbread theme
I am, and I'll tell you why.
Samsung hasn't even started building a GB ROM for our phone, and that's kind of weird to me, because I would think that they would have something.
I don't remember where I read this, and this could be wrong, but doesn't the carrier has to request the update, and then the manufacturer builds it? (I can be COMPLETELY wrong, so don't hold me to this) If that's true, then we may not see a GB build, because T-Mobile USA wouldn't request it.
Tell me what you think, because this interests me a lot.
Where did you get this info? that they haven't started the gingerbread for us.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
iynfynity said:
Where did you get this info? that they haven't started the gingerbread for us.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://twitter.com/#!/SamFirmware/status/81421451059671040
http://twitter.com/#!/SamFirmware/status/81257522966700032
There.
They posted the GS4G leak, the Cappy leak, and they have a leak for the Epic 4G.
since there have been no vibrant leaks, it automatically means they have not started building it?
sroach23 said:
since there have been no vibrant leaks, it automatically means they have not started building it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's not that, SamFirmware stated (and I honestly believe them, if they found all these leaks for other phones so quickly), that there's no Vibrant (SGH-T959) build, which could mean A LOT of things, possibly something as simple as Samsung is really lazy and doesn't want to upload it, but it would mean more.
I'm just saying, I don't know what's up, but I'd like to know more.
And they probably won't, at least not in the near future since there are a ****load of new 4G phones coming out in the near future. The Vibrant is old news already like yesterdays dirty laundry. Technology advances faster than you can fart.
djquick said:
And they probably won't, at least not in the near future since there are a ****load of new 4G phones coming out in the near future. The Vibrant is old news already like yesterdays dirty laundry. Technology advances faster than you can fart.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unfortunately, this is most likely the truth. :/
I hope they don't forget us. All we want is a leak.
Relax, It'll be released in a couple months for sure. Enjoy the new ROM's with working GPS this weekend
VICosPhi said:
Relax, It'll be released in a couple months for sure. Enjoy the new ROM's with working GPS this weekend
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
THAT's the only thing good thing for us about all these leaks, we have working GPS now.
djquick said:
And they probably won't, at least not in the near future since there are a ****load of new 4G phones coming out in the near future. The Vibrant is old news already like yesterdays dirty laundry. Technology advances faster than you can fart.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I fart very fast...
Sent from SGH-T959 (CM7)
I noticed that as well. But you have to remember that T-Mobile plays real dirty. Remember when we had 2.2 leaks back late November (JK2)? It didn't become official until #NeverAgain made such a huge PR mess for them that Samsung & T-Mobile had to release it. But it was up until then, that T-Mobile didn't want to update out phones because of the pending MT4G & SGS4G release, dirty mfers...
By the way this issue gets more complicated now with the AT&T merger. AT&T strongly believes that updates are not good for business. From their point of view if they don't do updates it gives users more reasons to upgrade to new phones.
So if TMo was borderline crap about this already, the adoption by AT&T is only going to delay things further.
What does that mean for us, enjoy the awesome roms on xda and forget about TMo.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Just read da tweets someone should just port from 4g to us
Ya boy
Ya, but Google kind of helped us all out with that. Its not up to the carriers if a phone is going to get an update anymore. If Manufactures want to use Android they have to abide by the 18 month update cycle this goes for carriers too. They have to provided updates to newer versions of Android during the first 18 month of a phones life. Our Vibrants really only have six months left of that 18 though. So don't expect an official Ice Cream Sandwich update. I wish google had been enforcing this rule back in the days of the original cliq and cliq xt. The poor XT didn't even get an update out of 1.5. I think Google has gotten tired of all the negative press that manufactures are developing because of the unwillingness to update phones. Of course as you we all know a lot of this has to do with carriers not wanting these updates or their need for unreasonable software packages they want add to the update packages.
How shock i am? Look at this pic.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Hmm I don't see it as a problem, well at least as long as we have the vibrant 4g, I'm just waiting for the sgs2, then I'll be gone
Well we cant be mad at samsung as its not there fault its tmobil. Most of us will be moving to hercules or sgs2 anyway so no worries crying over this in my opinion.
Yeah, I think it's time to accept the likelihood that Samsung/T-mo won't be providing much further development or support for the Vibrant given the new product lines. It doesn't mean it'll be obsolete though. Thanks developers!
what does it matter? theres literaly pages upon pages of custom rom's out there that are 100000x BETTER Then what any company puts out in the first place.
im pretty sure for a big majority of people here the first thing they do when they get a new phone is wipe it out and start over fresh.
what is it you want exactly, a bloated gingerbread rom from samsung full of **** you dont need or use?
what a useless thread
j1635 said:
what does it matter? theres literaly pages upon pages of custom rom's out there that are 100000x BETTER Then what any company puts out in the first place.
im pretty sure for a big majority of people here the first thing they do when they get a new phone is wipe it out and start over fresh.
what is it you want exactly, a bloated gingerbread rom from samsung full of **** you dont need or use?
what a useless thread
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Believe me it does matter.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
I was just looking at Engadget, and I saw this: http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/17/bell-mobility-hints-at-ice-cream-sandwich-release-dates-for-gala/
Here is what the article it says:
"We've come across an internal document from Bell Mobility that's bound to raise the hopes of a few good Canadians. Yes folks, we're talking Ice Cream Sandwich. The carrier to the north estimates that it'll have Android 4.0 ready for the Sensation in February, which is to be followed by the Raider's update in March -- this handset may be more familiar to AT&T customers as the Vivid. Pulling up the rear, users of the Galaxy S II are to expect the upgrade in April, and while the Optimus LTE is also mentioned, there's no specific time frame for that one. Certainly estimated release dates don't always come to fruition, but at least we know what Bell's aiming for, anyway."
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I really hope this estimate is wrong, what do you think?
Kp1. Maybe P = April
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
I think that is the date the Galaxy SII will get ICS on that carrier. Remember that a lot of carriers delay updates to their phones so they can be "certified". Also, if we already have a pretty much working build of ICS (give or take a few force closes and battery life), how can it take them so long to polish it?
At this stage i have to say im a bit pissed off that we still haven't been given ICS for our SGSII why cant they just release all the necessary code required so developers can do their thing.
Bell is very, very slow at releasing official firmware updates. As far as I know the SGSII still comes with their carrier branded 2.3.3
If they're releasing in April and that happens to be at the same time as ICS goes global, I'd be very, very, VERY surprised. Just a possibility.
I will be issed also if it isn't released by February by the latest, if it isn't i think ill be getting a nexus phone next year.
luke05dee said:
I will be issed also if it isn't released by February by the latest, if it isn't i think ill be getting a nexus phone next year.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think I am going to get the next nexus phone regardless of when we get ICS for the GS2.
to be honest i hope they dont rush it , it isnt just building ics for their hardware it needs intensive testing as well
the sgs2 has shipped over 10 million units now , releasing a firmware with bugs in it could do more harm then good and id rather wait and get a rock solid ics for our phones and for the devs to have a solid base to tweak from
lets face it they got the firmware the phone shipped with pretty dam good and i hope too see a nice stable ics release from them too
i use my phone to much to be using beta software and ive had enough nokias in my time and had enough of unstable buggy firmware and waiting for patches to come to fix the bugs
i think april sounds about right for a genuine samsung firmware that has been fully tested for stabillity and compatabillity with apps and extras
Does not sound like an xda developer member...just sayin'
Envoyé depuis mon GT-I9100 utilisant Tapatalk
jonny68 said:
At this stage i have to say im a bit pissed off that we still haven't been given ICS for our SGSII why cant they just release all the necessary code required so developers can do their thing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here we go again!
Intratech said:
Here we go again!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They do it because they're mean. But I guess they don't like law suits either. Mean.
Sent from my MicroTAC 9800X using speech to fax modem
This really means nothing for international GS2's. More than likely Samsung's ICS will release in late December/early January and those on XDA will have it looong before Bell in Canada.
Bell is an North America carrier which does not have any Apple vs. Samsung court cases.
Yet, rest of the world do. That's why I can certainly say that Ice Cream Sandwich for SGS II & Galaxy Tabs will be the fastest delivery of an Android distribution (from Google release to End users) Samsung ever made.
That date is for carrier branded phones.
For international phones it would be much sooner.
I'm expecting mid Jan
xethor said:
how can it take them so long to polish it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dude... Have you ever tried to polish ice cream? Took me ages and it still wasnt that shiney...
Sent from my grammaphone
Well let see when is ICS released Foote galaxy S2. There is no even ant sign of CM9. Earlier there was issue of mic not working during call. Now after release of the leak version, lots of stuff are working but unstable, but now no any news of CM9 for galaxy S2. It seems we have to depend on Samsung rather then cm9 team for ICS. Developers pls don't be hurt. Almost all devices are getting ICS except S2. It really feels bad that we are deprived of the same. Thanks
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
Hope you guys that live in Europe get the update Asap. Here in Latin America (Brazil), we will receive the update maybe on Q3 2012. But, i really hope that all of us can get CM9 before April.
vicelord.leo said:
Well let see when is ICS released Foote galaxy S2. There is no even ant sign of CM9. Earlier there was issue of mic not working during call. Now after release of the leak version, lots of stuff are working but unstable, but now no any news of CM9 for galaxy S2. It seems we have to depend on Samsung rather then cm9 team for ICS. Developers pls don't be hurt. Almost all devices are getting ICS except S2. It really feels bad that we are deprived of the same. Thanks
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its actually samsung's fault they haven't got it working yet. Samsung hasn't released kernel sources yet. I think the main obstacle right now for cm9 is the RIL is unstable. Codeworkx said once they can stabilize that they'd probably have a beta soon after. Kernel sources would give the cm9 team what they need to get RIL stable. So when we get that or a leak with stable RIL we should get cm9. I totally believe the cm team will get to the finish line long before Samsung. The other devices already getting alphas and betas of cm9 must just be easier to get working. I've read the galaxy sII is "unique" to code for because of the hardware.
jonny68 said:
At this stage i have to say im a bit pissed off that we still haven't been given ICS for our SGSII why cant they just release all the necessary code required so developers can do their thing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There's still a lot of work to be done by Sammy.
They can't release something they don't have - makes sense, doesn't it?
As for the second part of your statement: They did. KP1, nuff said.
Definitely for that carrier.
KP1 is already released and all the major functions work. So another month max it will take to release the stable version.
And I didn't pay 600 US$ to Devs, but Samsung, so it's their responsibility to release it at time, hence I don't give a damn what Devs are doing.
Still I think Samsung should take a little bit of extra time, if it's needed, it's far better to release a Stable version than releasing a non stable one in a hurry. Also Google said that they would like the manufacturers to use 4.0.3 as the base version, so I don't know if Samsung will give us 4.0.1 like KP1 or directly 4.0.3.
Google also wants 4.0.3 as the base version of Ice Cream Sandwich to be used by Android handset manufacturers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Source:
http://www.gsmarena.com/gsm_galaxy_nexus_gets_402_update_403_announced_already-news-3533.php