Database Users

does MinFreeManager and alike work on our phones with our Nand still locked?

does MinFreeManager and apps similar to it actually work on our phones? can anyone confirm they work even though we are still Nand locked?

Yes, it works. My personal choice for such a task is Autokiller.
http://www.appbrain.com/app/com.rs.autokiller

xvenom89 said:
Yes, it works. My personal choice for such a task is Autokiller.
http://www.appbrain.com/app/com.rs.autokiller
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
how did you confirm that it actually works?
on MinFreeManager i just set empty to 200, and the next one to 100 and i still have only 110MB free.
i know 200 is a ridiculous number to set it to, but shouldn't i see things getting killed and a number closer to 200 when i check available memory? i would just like to see it do something.
EDIT: i really don't think MinFreeManager is working. i set the values to 200, 150, 100, 50, 25, and 10. i still only have 106MB free according to System Panel. i know these are really high values, but i would think i would see it doing something.

ok, it actually may be working.
with my crazy high values set i opened pretty much every single app i have on my phone and the memory never dropped below 95MB or so.
i then set the values much much lower (the mild setting) and was able to get it down to the mid 60's. so i guess it's working, but it just isn't as aggressive as i expected.
what do you think?

xvenom89 said:
Yes, it works. My personal choice for such a task is Autokiller.
http://www.appbrain.com/app/com.rs.autokiller
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Minfreemanager might be the most lightweight, but I like AutoKiller the best too -- big battery saver, our RAM isn't close to being challenged yet, but it prevents background processes from hogging RAM. I like the "extreme" or "strict" settings -- and yeah, when I up the preset, the amount of RAM available jumps up as the Java VM grabs RAM back. Also, I like White Killer, for the quick-kill of everything but what you think you need.

I'm giving Autokiller a go right now. I have it set at 150, 100, 75, 25, 10, and 5.
I had been using either Autokiller or Auto Memory Manager on my rooted Moto Droid since day one and it worked great on it. i just wasn't sure it was working on the Inc since we aren't quite as rooted as the Droid yet.

jasonb1985 said:
I'm giving Autokiller a go right now. I have it set at 150, 100, 75, 25, 10, and 5.
I had been using either Autokiller or Auto Memory Manager on my rooted Moto Droid since day one and it worked great on it. i just wasn't sure it was working on the Inc since we aren't quite as rooted as the Droid yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It works by using commands available in the stock command console, just like Phone Prioritizer manipulates renice frequency to make the phone go more fast Or . . . Memory for Lemmings prompts Java VM to check to see what memory it can take back from dormant apps.

jasonb1985 said:
ok, it actually may be working.
with my crazy high values set i opened pretty much every single app i have on my phone and the memory never dropped below 95MB or so.
i then set the values much much lower (the mild setting) and was able to get it down to the mid 60's. so i guess it's working, but it just isn't as aggressive as i expected.
what do you think?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've only had an android phone now for a few weeks...my first smartphone, but I'm very interested in the inner workings so bear with me.
I'm with you on whether or not it is working. I set my values really high...250 for my last three numbers really expecting to see something happen such as all the apps that were "empty" being killed to free up some memory. Instead my memory got down in the 180s. Are we just confused about how the internal memory manager should work with these values?

V6 SuperCharger for a laggy phone

I just want to know if anyone else is running this script. I refused to believe my Nexus S was not behaving, after all, it's a Nexus S! But, eventually even I had to get real. Truth is, lately, no matter what ROM I'm running after a few days things would slow down way too much. Lag, Launcher redraws, FCs due to lag. Things were too slow.
Anyway, I used the V6 SuperCharger script and it really has changed things. I used the MegaRAM option for 512 MB phones and I swear it has been a revelation. Even overclocking couldn't bring about this change. Currently, I'm on MIUI which most people consider to be a bit heavy and clunky. However, after supercharging with the MegaRAM option and Bulletproofing the launcher it's unstoppable! Highly recommended for those of you experiencing phone lag. Make sure to follow the Dev's instructions for using his script. All credit to user: zeppelinrox. Amazing stuff!

Which MegaRAM option did you select? I picked the second option, but I don't know which is better for Nexus S. So far I noticed browser is much much smoother now, other things has always been smooth for me, so I can't really tell the difference.

I used the 2nd MegaRAM option as well. But, I'm going to test out the first option. As I understand it, the more memory you want free in the 3rd slot the less multi tasking you can do (as this is where the secondary apps will be places)...I THINK!
As per that thread if 25 MB is good enough on a Milestone, a Nexus S should do well with 40 MB.
THIS from the thread:
zeppelinrox said:
Additional Info: You can find each app's priority and OOM.
....................... In AMM, Press Menu > Running Processes > Group by OOM grouping.
....................... Expand each group and see what apps are included and each app's priority level. (Higher numbers get killed first!)
....................... If you tap on an app, you can get additional info. Tip: Check and see what's included with android.process.acore
The default minfree values ("kill thresholds") for each OOM group are, as far as I can tell: 6, 8, 16, 20, 22 and 24 mb. (CyanogenMod 6.1.2)
This means that: when free memory lowers to 24 mb, EMPTY_APPS get killed; at 22 mb free ram, CONTENT_PROVIDER apps get killed; and so on...
Now, because the Milestone has only 256 mb of memory, I found these numbers too low, especially the 3rd one.
Basically, with those settings, you will usually be sitting with only 20 - 25 mb of ram.
Possibly less. Basically, it's the 3rd number (16) + 5. That's your free memory.
And my phone just chokes when it has that little ram available. Lag, home screen redrawing, the launcher getting killed.... ugh....
After extensive fiddling around, I've come to the conclusion that setting the third slot to about 25mb works great.
No home screen redraws while not being too aggressive on secondary/background apps while having about 30-35mb free all the time
BTW, free ram is not wasted. Android will use that memory to cache the file system and this speeds things up. See this informative post.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

Si_NZ said:
Which MegaRAM option did you select? I picked the second option, but I don't know which is better for Nexus S. So far I noticed browser is much much smoother now, other things has always been smooth for me, so I can't really tell the difference.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just tested the 1st MegaRAM option and things are quite smooth. Launcher is not as buttery as with the 2nd option but, it's still great. The browser does quite well too, pinch to zoom is smooth but, scrolling is a little stuttery on a heavy page like Engadget's.

Just wanted to tell - if you are on my MIUI ROM, don't use it because I have my own RAM Optimization script integrated.

never heard of this till this morning, thanks for bringing it up
trying it out now

brainmaster said:
Just wanted to tell - if you are on my MIUI ROM, don't use it because I have my own RAM Optimization script integrated.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I love it when a tweaker tells tweakers not to tweak.
Really!

zeppelinrox said:
I love it when a tweaker tells tweakers not to tweak.
Really!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you should know that two scripts running can cause issues......

zeppelinrox said:
I love it when a tweaker tells tweakers not to tweak.
Really!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't said anything against your script, just told the users to not use it on my custom ROM. A think that as maker of your script you should know - two RAM scripts on same ROM are doing only damage.

They don't stay running.
They execute and end.
Whichever one runs last is the one that sticks.
Many people were using juwe's script with the V6 script and things ran fine so it's not a big deal.
Of course, if somebody wanted to, they can delete the minfrees in any of their custom roms and plug them into supercharger...
Why do you guys like scaring the crap out of people for nothing? lol

brainmaster said:
Just wanted to tell - if you are on my MIUI ROM, don't use it because I have my own RAM Optimization script integrated.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Great to hear from you. Haha. Just about to ask you

does it work well with cm7?

mohsin125 said:
does it work well with cm7?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm running it on cm7, and my phone seemed to be a bit snappier
time will tell though

Can someone put this in a stock rom? Sounds too complicated
. Interested in more speed but stock on matrix rom is pretty fast

rican408 said:
Can someone put this in a stock rom? Sounds too complicated
. Interested in more speed but stock on matrix rom is pretty fast
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
use this guide, and it will be easier than you could imagine
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1126940

I tried this and for some reason it derped my sim card, said it was locked (couldnt unlock it when booted as it just went passed the pin screen and onto home screen) and the home button wouldnt work. Anyone got any ideas?

Haizum74 said:
I tried this and for some reason it derped my sim card, said it was locked (couldnt unlock it when booted as it just went passed the pin screen and onto home screen) and the home button wouldnt work. Anyone got any ideas?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've seen this problem with the SIM/PIN lock on other ROMs. You might want to try disabling and re-enabling the SIM/PIN lock from settings. It should immediately ask for the PIN and reenable you Home key. What settings did you apply? Maybe they killed off your system guard.
Sent from my Google Nexus S using XDA App

Just an update on my settings. The MegaRAM seem to really speed everything up but, I find that they weren't being nice to my Whatsapp (I was missing messages now and then) I think Whatsapp would receive the message but get immediately killed before it could broadcast the notification. Once it even seemed to exit in app for no reason at all. So I switched to Balanced Settings 3 and so far Whatsapp as well as the launcher and phone in general has been very responsive.
Sent from my Google Nexus S using XDA App

deejaylobo said:
I've seen this problem with the SIM/PIN lock on other ROMs. You might want to try disabling and re-enabling the SIM/PIN lock from settings. It should immediately ask for the PIN and reenable you Home key. What settings did you apply? Maybe they killed off your system guard.
Sent from my Google Nexus S using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I went for Megaram option 1 (I think). I disabled password and it then worked but by this time I had uninstalled the script. Any particular option you suggest? Cheers for the reply too.

It depends on your usage. I would suggest starting out with Balanced settings 3 and moving up or down the menu depending on whether you want more(down) or less speed(up). I've found that the trade off is speed vs multitasking. Though, I think zeppelinrox could confirm whether I'm right.

Aurora Performance Tips/Tricks/Tweaks

In this thread we should share our own little tweaks to this amazing ROM.
I'll add to this first post any stuff that is proven to increase speed or makes using the ROM easier or more enjoyable
Note, this isn't intended to include mods and addons, as there is already a great thread for that
IMPORTANT:
Always backup stuff! And reboot after teaking!
Please note that, the ones I've found more useful, I add a USEFUL tag in front of them
____________________________________
BUILD.PROP tweaks
With root explorer or any other method of your liking, go to /system/ and edit the file build.prop.
- To increase max fps limit possible, add:
Code:
windowsmgr.max_events_per_sec=150
I'm not sure this one is really useful, I think android already sets this already to around 1.5x screen refresh rate. The gains could be negligible.
- Disable error checking, add:
Code:
ro.kernel.android.checkjni=0
- USEFUL Stop debugging icon from appearing in status bar (doesn't disable adb), add:
Code:
persist.adb.notify=0
- USEFUL Force home launcher into memory, add:
Code:
ro.HOME_APP_ADJ=1
_______________________________________________
OTHER TWEAKS AND TRICKS
- VERY, Extremely, Mega-USEFUL - Go to:
Code:
/system/lib/elg
Open egl.cfg and delete the 1st line (0 0 android), reboot the phone.
Everything should be much smoother, I notice this especially opening folders with a lot of icons in Apex Launcher. I think this disables the default android software rendering method and uses only GPU. Don't ask me if this is different than setting composition mode to gpu in build.prop, I don't know, I just know everything is much faster
USEFUL - Only works with Aurora 2.07+ and synaptics screen - Tweak your screen duplicate filter, like in x5settings for .32 kernels.
Go to:
sys/module/synaptics_i2c_rmi_1564/parameters/sensitivity
Open the file "sensitivity" and tweak the value. Default is 4. Higher values reduce screen flickering/jitter but screen can become less sensitive, lower values, the contrary. Personally I use 8, works very good for my fingers, adjust you value accordingly. Note, this takes effect immediately, but doesn't stick after a reboot. To make it stick after a reboot, go to "/system/etc/", open one of the scripts, I recommend "ini.qcom.post_boot.sh", and add this at the end:
Code:
echo 8 > sys/module/synaptics_i2c_rmi_1564/parameters/sensitivity
where 8 is the value you want. Save, reboot and check is the value is there, in the "sensitivity" file.
- USEFUL - Great tips on how to save battery without turning everything off (bonus, doesn't use BS calibration myth):
http://www.androidcentral.com/keeping-your-charge-how-improve-battery-life-your-android-phone

Works AMAZINGLY thank you
Edit1: Also may i ask what CPU settings do you use? any overclocks/governor?
Edit2: I got that funny text glitch just before, i decided to wipe cache and dalvik and i haven't had it again yet. Ill get a screen shot if it happens again but im pretty sure you know what i mean, all the text for apps look like squiggly lines/really odd ive seen this happen normally in previous versions of aurora but oh well ill come back with more info if anything else happens thanks again!

thank you mate. Two quick questions. If i disable kernel debugging will this affect logcat? And what cpu composition does?
Cheers
Sent from my U8800 using xda premium

spirosbond said:
thank you mate. Two quick questions. If i disable kernel debugging will this affect logcat? And what cpu composition does?
Cheers
Sent from my U8800 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Regarding the logcat, yes, probably disables that functionality, I've read in other sites, it just disables checking for errors, thus performance improvements. When I have time, I'll check if logcat is still there... the composition thing I think it tells the OS to always use GPU no matter what, I see a great improvement with that one, don't know if anything is affected, but so far, everything is great
EDIT: these tweaks were from here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1578065
Sent from my U8800
Here are some more:
http://www.freeyourandroid.com/guide/build-prop-modifications
If you try some, please post results, to add to first post.

spirosbond said:
thank you mate. Two quick questions. If i disable kernel debugging will this affect logcat? And what cpu composition does?
Cheers
Sent from my U8800 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Logcat still works

Added synaptics TS setting like there was in X5settings app (Touchscreen Filter).

fjsferreira said:
Added synaptics TS setting like there was in X5settings app (Touchscreen Filter).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hi there, i have changed it right now to value 10 and its the same, its trembling...
i have kernel v3 from Dzo 2.0.5 rom.
and have restart the phone too

r1c4rd0 said:
hi there, i have changed it right now to value 10 and its the same, its trembling...
i have kernel v3 from Dzo 2.0.5 rom.
and have restart the phone too
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, I think so, maybe it was just placebo... also, it doesn't stick after a reboot, the ROM would need init.d startup script support and a script to change the value everytime... try change it to 40 or something, and report, it it still trembles, I'll remove from the first post...

fjsferreira said:
Yes, I think so, maybe it was just placebo... also, it doesn't stick after a reboot, the ROM would need init.d startup script support and a script to change the value everytime... try change it to 40 or something, and report, it it still trembles, I'll remove from the first post...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
will try it right now
edit: changed the value and no diference... then i restart and no diference too...

I think it doesn't work... I've changed it to 1 and notice no difference... I'll remove that thing from front post and post here if anyone wants to study it...

- Something to try, it seems not to work... - Improve synaptics screen sensitivity!
Do you miss x5Settings setting about touchscreen filter? I've been studying x5settings source code and found out what file needs to be changed to achieve the same result in Aurora. Go to:
- sys/module/synaptics_i2c_rmi_1564/parameters/
Edit the file "sensitivity" and set a value appropriate for you. I've set it to 8 and touchscreen seems better now. Maximum value I think is 64, and that works great too. I think this isn't placebo Pinch to zoom in pics doesn't "tremble" when holding the fingers on the screen as it did before, here.
EDIT: it doesn't stick after a reboot! And values change by itself, don't know why, maybe it doesn't even work... Try it for your self

fjsferreira said:
- Something to try, it seems not to work... - Improve synaptics screen sensitivity!
Do you miss x5Settings setting about touchscreen filter? I've been studying x5settings source code and found out what file needs to be changed to achieve the same result in Aurora. Go to:
- sys/module/synaptics_i2c_rmi_1564/parameters/
Edit the file "sensitivity" and set a value appropriate for you. I've set it to 8 and touchscreen seems better now. Maximum value I think is 64, and that works great too. I think this isn't placebo Pinch to zoom in pics doesn't "tremble" when holding the fingers on the screen as it did before, here.
EDIT: it doesn't stick after a reboot! And values change by itself, don't know why, maybe it doesn't even work... Try it for your self
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hey fjsferreira if you want stick after a reboot, you must to paste this command "echo 8 > /sys/module/synaptics_i2c_rmi_1564/parameters/sensitivity" (without the quotes) into 1 of the files in /etc/init.d
number 8 is choise by us... but make 8 for this example

r1c4rd0 said:
hey fjsferreira if you want stick after a reboot, you must to paste this command "echo 8 > /sys/module/synaptics_i2c_rmi_1564/parameters/sensitivity" (without the quotes) into 1 of the files in /etc/init.d
number 8 is choise by us... but make 8 for this example
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The problem is, there isn't an /etc/init.d :S maybe it can be added to one of the scripts in /etc/

fjsferreira said:
The problem is, there isn't an /etc/init.d :S maybe it can be added to one of the scripts in /etc/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes it can...

r1c4rd0 said:
yes it can...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, it did, thank you... now I'm waiting to see if dzo responds in Aurora thread confirming this is working. I have a sense it works somehow, damn placebo is powerful!

fjsferreira said:
Yes, it did, thank you... now I'm waiting to see if dzo responds in Aurora thread confirming this is working. I have a sense it works somehow, damn placebo is powerful!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes it works, but i think its related to his new v3.0 kernel...
in .35 kernel, if i´m not worng, we can change that value.
i think placebo dont work with me lol

fjsferreira said:
Yes, it did, thank you... now I'm waiting to see if dzo responds in Aurora thread confirming this is working. I have a sense it works somehow, damn placebo is powerful!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tried 8 and 10 but the flickering didn't reduce. Thanks for the tip though. I hope you get it working...
Question:
What is the difference between the mod:" get rid of cpu composition" and setting the line
debug.composition.type=gpu
at build.prop?
By making the above change doolde jump graphics where improved
Cheers

You have ro.HOME_APP_ADJ=0 to force the launcher into the memory, but wouldn't the right value be 1?

FlashTH said:
You have ro.HOME_APP_ADJ=0 to force the launcher into the memory, but wouldn't the right value be 1?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Correct. I've fixed it, thank you!
Sent from my U8800

i dont know if you notice, but wen the phone is charging touchscreen feels more jumpy...
can anyone confirm this?
maybe this will interest dzo in the ics port? in this site there are the amtel and synaptics drivers:
port ics input drivers
drivers from HTC Legend touch the same as desire:
drivers synaptics from htc
thanks

Possible ram fix for 4.3, NEED TESTERS!

So a while ago I discussed with my friend rohit joshi (developer of tegra overclock) about a system file called adj, and how it may be responsible for sometimes disturbing ram behaviour. It couldn't be adjusted AFAIK on 4.1, but it seems to allow modification on 4.3.
1: Mount system R/W
2: Open /sys/module/lowmemorykiller/parameters/and open the file named adj
3: Change it to the following: 0,10,25,50,80,150 and save the file
Now please observe ram management in intense situations such as using chrome or heavy games, so far I have noticed no irrational behavior like asphalt 8 committing suicide etc, but its early days and we need more data. Custom values are welcome but please mention what you used
Note: These values reset upon reboot
Sent while my supervisor wasn't looking

Great,work on eXistenZ 2.1.5!
Before:429MB ram free
After:563MB ram free!
On stock without this mod i have 429mb free LOl

I think Supercharger solve those problems this way for two years now.

Hmm this isn't really it's purpose, also these values fluctuate on their own btw . It's supposed to stop foreground processes and other important stuff from getting killed in low memory situations, for example once my alarm stopped responding because I was busy extracting a zip file. This fix is for this kind of wierdness
Sent while my supervisor wasn't looking

asphalt 8 close by itself if i play tokyo track.. on other track game works nicely

@non4 said:
3: Change it to the following: 0,10,25,50,80,150 and save the file
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Could you explain more what these values are...
is it oom_adj parameters
and why changing them so drastically?
Default values are 0,58,117,235,529,1000
Shouldn't we try first minfree parameters which are also IMHO odd...
15000,17532,20065,22598,25131,30263 which equals (Nx4/1024)
58.6 68.5 78.4 88.3 98.2 118.2 Megabytes
I change mine to 8192,16384,18432,24576,32768,65536 or 32,64,72,96,128,256 Mb
so far so good... will see over a longer period of time... :silly:

freedom74 said:
Could you explain more what these values are...
is it oom_adj parameters
and why changing them so drastically?
Default values are 0,58,117,235,529,1000
Shouldn't we try first minfree parameters which are also IMHO odd...
15000,17532,20065,22598,25131,30263 which equals (Nx4/1024)
58.6 68.5 78.4 88.3 98.2 118.2 Megabytes
I change mine to 8192,16384,18432,24576,32768,65536 or 32,64,72,96,128,256 Mb
so far so good... will se over a longer period of time... :silly:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I changed them this way simply based on advice given, as I say different values are welcome I don't fully understand it myself however what I know is it seems to be working. I have been told that newer snapdragon devices have different adjacent values to other phones. This causes apps that SHOULD be closed to instead not be closed and so the system resorts to closing your fave game or whatever. Adjacent and minfrees have a relationship but I'm not sure exactly how it works, will try and find some better info on it
Sent while my supervisor wasn't looking

poran123 said:
asphalt 8 close by itself if i play tokyo track.. on other track game works nicely
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm just spotted your comment there, I've been running Tokyo fine on high graphics, have you done anything else to the ram like change the minfrees? Feel free to play around with these values and report if you have any luck
Sent while my supervisor wasn't looking

@non4 said:
Hmm just spotted your comment there, I've been running Tokyo fine on high graphics, have you done anything else to the ram like change the minfrees? Feel free to play around with these values and report if you have any luck
Sent while my supervisor wasn't looking
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i didnt change anything only did what is written on the op....

poran123 said:
i didnt change anything only did what is written on the op....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol, I just got the dreaded home crash! Will continue to experiment, it makes no sense how bad it is, I just ran this game on high graphics on a galaxy s2 and homescreen didn't even redraw when I was done!
I found some info on this driver here:
https://android.googlesource.com/ke...4ac/drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c
It might actually be worth trying higher values instead of lower ones from what I'm reading here
Sent while my supervisor wasn't looking

How is it going with adj settings?
According to http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=5442369&nocache=1&z=6948587024309106
adj values determines how apps will be killed in case of Out Of Memory situations
Numbers are, similar to minfree settings connected to
ForegroundAPP, VisibleAPP, SecondaryServer, HiddenAPP, ContentProvider, EmptyAPP and hence the numbers
0,58,117,235,529,1000
The higher number, more probably the process will bi killed.
You can say "if free memory goes below XXXX then kill some process with oom_adj greater then YYY; if free memory goes even more below than ZZZ then start to kill some processes with oom_adj greater than XYXY. and so on.."
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So, values 0,10,25,50,80,150 for adj
will give results but also kills too many processes, maybe some important ones.
Maybe someone that have expeirience with linux kernels can answer the question:
Who sets oom_adj parameter of a process?
IMHO, by setting these adj values, you tell system to treat all processes with oom_adj higher than 150 like EMPTY_APP
Will try changing adj settings but perhaps with some less agressive parameters... let's say half of the original
0,25,50,100,250,500

someone told that actually sony latest framework that eat ram.. not by apps/bloatware.. which mean even though we kill foreground app.. it will load more cpu after that.. will raise more probs such as lags n battery drain.. but simply for playing heavy games i think it works..
sony knows this issue... maybe they will fix it in the next update.. maybe

I've been playing around and conclude that this works somewhat but you must lower your minfrees too for maximum effect, not sure what the best combination of values is just yet, seems lower = better, but too low may cause lag as ram fills up. One more thing is I noticed sometimes adj changes it's values back, perhaps if it considers them invalid as it only happens with certain values I tried
Sent while my supervisor wasn't looking

danielhariri said:
sony knows this issue... maybe they will fix it in the next update.. maybe
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is there a place to report a bug?
Yes I know they are aware of the issue but if more people report a bug, greater is the chance that they release a patch.

hi
i Change it to the following: 0,10,25,50,80,150 and save the file but When it was reset phone, Has not changed ... whay ?

/sys is not a real directory
It's a virtual file system so everything you change vanishes after reboot.
If you have some settings other than defaults you want to put into /sys you can do it via init.d scripts during the boot time.
Sent from my C5303 using xda app-developers app

freedom74 said:
/sys is not a real directory
It's a virtual file system so everything you change vanishes after reboot.
If you have some settings other than defaults you want to put into /sys you can do it via init.d scripts during the boot time.
Sent from my C5303 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Catch !! sorry
I just did that? 0,58,117,235,529,1000 After rebooting Can not be changed? not changed!!

Well, I said if you want your values get inserted automatically you need init.d script.
But since these values we talk about here are still unconfirmed and for testing I think it's better to stick with manual entering rather than automatic.
What I do is that I typed as SU in command prompt using Android Terminal app a command
echo "0,10,25,50,80,150“ > /sys/module/lowmemorykiller/parameter/adj
Same for minfree settings
Sent from my C5303 using xda app-developers app

freedom74 said:
Well, I said if you want your values get inserted automatically you need init.d script.
But since these values we talk about here are still unconfirmed and for testing I think it's better to stick with manual entering rather than automatic.
What I do is that I typed as SU in command prompt using Android Terminal app a command
echo "0,10,25,50,80,150“ > /sys/module/lowmemorykiller/parameter/adj
Same for minfree settings
Sent from my C5303 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And for init.d
#! /system/bin/sh
echo "0,10,25,50,80,150“ > /sys/module/lowmemorykiller/parameter/adj
Sent while my supervisor wasn't looking

Fixes a lot of games and sets kernel proper ... A must try !

Disable other kernel tweaks !
Gets rid of lag for real max settings on PUBG CODM and most all games..
It sets some unusual settings unusual like ...
It takes a minute to optimize but best tool ever ..
Like always switch to WPA on router and no more wifi drop..
Wish we had a kernel for newer vulkan ROMs @ 2350MHz CPU and 950MHz GPU that's the boards proper factory speed and gets 45 to 60 fps in most games easily ..
I'd be willing to test any kernel !
It would be cool if I could adjust voltages ..
I love you peeps ...Ask your moms ...Give our awesome developers some money please. ...
https://forum.xda-developers.com/apps/magisk/module-nfs-injectorv1-t3857231

I'm on this ROM ..
https://androidfilehost.com/?fid=4349826312261601308
What a great ROM peeps !
Give this developer some cash !
He loves you peeps so much ...
https://forum.xda-developers.com/member.php?u=2109242

How to fix play store ?
Like I can mod build prop and download them but must revert to play them ?
Why ?

Yes if you have WiFi problems set router to any WPA and it goes away ..
And if tos is proper the installs wipes and formats go quick normal ..
Get that right !
Set zram @ 1300MB really ..
Turn ram tweaks low ..or off ..
IO read ahead is not cool @ 2048 is OK @ 1024 and smooth @ 512 ..
"screen touch and rotation problems in games above @1024" ..
Elementalx is OK governor ..
Interactive tuned @ go hi speed 55 is cool ..

Yes if you have WiFi problems set router to any WPA and it goes away ..
And if tos is proper the installs wipes and formats go quick normal ..
Get that right !
Set zram @ 1300MB really ..
Turn ram tweaks low ..or off ..
IO read ahead is not cool @ 2048 is OK @ 1024 and smooth @ 512 ..
"screen touch and rotation problems in games above @1024" ..
Elementalx is OK governor ..
Interactive tuned @ go hi speed 55 is cool ..

Not sure how I keep double posting help me out peeps ?

I made a proof video to show you how to set games @ max settings as well as my kernel settings..
I'm not high but don't know how to upload it here ..
Im Jollyjesus187 on hangouts tho ask me peeps ...

jollyjesus said:
Yes if you have WiFi problems set router to any WPA and it goes away ..
And if tos is proper the installs wipes and formats go quick normal ..
Get that right !
Set zram @ 1300MB really ..
Turn ram tweaks low ..or off ..
IO read ahead is not cool @ 2048 is OK @ 1024 and smooth @ 512 ..
"screen touch and rotation problems in games above @1024" ..
Elementalx is OK governor ..
Interactive tuned @ go hi speed 55 is cool ..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This setting makes me laugh a lot

Artemka2008 said:
This setting makes me laugh a lot
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes they are very odd settings but work well in pubg and games in general ...
Gets lag sometimes on chrome and some other web apps tho and lots of battery drain ..
These setting are set by the app mentioned ..
I think when the tool is enabled the it changes zram and ram optimizations a few after you stop playing a game but yes some strange setting ...
Try them ?
I play call of duty in all modes very little lag
@ Maxed settings via gltools ..
Tested on several roms android 6 through 8 ..
And the SD read ahead set @ above 512 causes touch drops during games "guns of boom asphalt 8 9 " and others ...
I would like to try the [email protected] 950 on newer roms ..
I'm moving on to nexus 9 I think so I will test whatever you peeps got ...Thank you ..
I love you ...

Other odd settings ...
Artemka2008 said:
This setting makes me laugh a lot
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Odd yes