Database Users

G2 benchmark... numbers sucked!

Just flashed enoms g2 rom and I cleared up what I can, tried making it efficient.I ran some benchmark tests on quadrant standard and was kinda disappointed in the numbers. My bests score was low 1100 after that it was 850,900, 835... very basic stuff any suggestions???
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using XDA App

If you ran the benchmark on battery power, try plugging the phone in. Sometimes the CPU will underclock itself to save power. If that doesn't work, download SetCPU (google it) and make sure that the max speed is set above 800 MHz.

On the stock G2 ROM I was getting 1600-1800... maybe it's the ROM your using

omarsalmin said:
On the stock G2 ROM I was getting 1600-1800... maybe it's the ROM your using
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah this is the typical range for a stock G2.
Those scores in the OP are so low, its almost like hes underclocking or something. Or possibly a running application using a ton of resources?

i got 2064. but i was running virtuous.

im running enom's rom and i had it underclocked at 768 and i was still able to get 1609

Stargazer418 said:
If you ran the benchmark on battery power, try plugging the phone in. Sometimes the CPU will underclock itself to save power. If that doesn't work, download SetCPU (google it) and make sure that the max speed is set above 800 MHz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Umm... No... The CPU doesn't underclock to save power...

gravis86 said:
Umm... No... The CPU doesn't underclock to save power...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Perhaps the kernel has an undervolting profile built in and it's triggered by a < battery percentage?
Sent from my HTC Vision using XDA App

What should I have my phone clocked at with enoms rom?? I dnt have much running at all I dnt understand why its so slow, I was gunna flash the latest kernal and try that... clock settings please anyone
Edit: jus tweaked my clock on spareparts. I switched cpu governor from ondemand to performance and the clock setting. I put underclock at the lowest and overclock at the max highest... benchmark test put up a 2200... I feel as if this will drain battery like crazy only time will tell... what do u think, should I drop the overclock? Is it safe at that high number???
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using XDA App

If I run with Flippy's kernel, CM 6.1.1 Stable and OC my phone to 1.8 GHz, I can get a Quadrant score of 3037 (screenshot below). With it OC'd to 1.4 GHz (my normal OC setting) I can get around 2500.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

If I'm averging 2500 I'm fine wit that my current settings are Enoms Rom
Using enoms cpu controls
Cpu governor: performance
Max frequency: 1,516,800
Min frequency 245,760
I dropped 3 percent in battery writing this message.... my main concern is battery and overworking the cpu.... I'm thinking about downloading set cpu and clocking the performance settings then set it for power save after a certain drop point........ does this sound logical?
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using XDA App

When you set your cpu to performance it means your cpu will stay at max all the time and it never goes down which is why you are getting bad battery life.
There is no need for that.
Yes you can do that with setcpu
Sent from my HTC Vision using XDA App

Maybe you tested your Samsung Galaxy s by mistake?..lol..just joking.

I score around 2500 on quadrant:
OC'd to 1.4 (normally run 1.2)
SetCpu On Demand
CyanogenMod 6.1

fablife said:
Maybe you tested your Samsung Galaxy s by mistake?..lol..just joking.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey! Not funny! My vibrant gets 2035 in the quadrant! But I'm going to get myself a g2 because I miss the hardware keyboard

Got me 2813 with Virtous 0.9 <---- (sense rom btw) and eVil's latest Glacier based kernel @ 1.5ghz... life is good
Sent from my HTC Vision using XDA App

[Tips & Tricks][Poll] SetCPU Advanced Configs [NS & NS4G]- Share Yours!

Ok so it is very hard to find dedicated threads to this and I think the more of us trying this and reporting back to one thread, the more successful we will be in achieving great battery life or performance (i do it for battery life)
Here's what i have found to work well today, just some simple adjustments but my battery didn't drop a single percent for about 1.5 hours of very light use(still great tho).
MAIN TAB
Setting the Scaling to: Conservative
Max: 1000MHz
Min: 100MHz
PROFILES TAB (i only have one profile set):
Screen off - Max: 400 (don't go lower, your phone wont wakeup)- Min: 100- conservative - Priority 50
ADVANCED TAB(minimal changes, but i feel they have helped a bit):
Sampling Rate: 20000
Up Thresh: 80
Down Thresh: 25
Ignore Nice: 0
Freq Step: 20
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
These may not be the best settings as we will play guess n check, but thats the reason of this thread, lets figure these things out.

You need root permission's for this, correct?

driftnut56 said:
You need root permission's for this, correct?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yessir you do

You should look into the smartass governor if you want to look for screen off frequencies. SetCPU only wastes CPU cycles for you to do this when a kernel can do it. Of course, I believe the end result is that you're still saving more battery, so at least it's a step forward

I'm overclocking 1.2 ghz. Switching between interactive and conservative.
Conservative has better battery life, but interactive is a bit snappier.
I'm new to the setcpu thing; gathered bits and pieces here and there to try and find the perfect settings.
Great thread though, hopefully people will post so we can take full advantage of this beast!
BTW, Tried to post screenshots, but I need more forum activity.

Had no success with conservative myself it allows the clock to step down to 100 eventhough I have the minimum at 200. The smart ass works like a charm no more lock screen lag
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using Tapatalk

teddybrukshut said:
I'm overclocking 1.2 ghz. Switching between interactive and conservative.
Conservative has better battery life, but interactive is a bit snappier.
I'm new to the setcpu thing; gathered bits and pieces here and there to try and find the perfect settings.
Great thread though, hopefully people will post so we can take full advantage of this beast!
BTW, Tried to post screenshots, but I need more forum activity.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi. I am new to over clocking with SetCPU. How did you get it to go over the 1000 max? I don't understand all of the other settings enough to feel brave enough to change them other than the first tab.
Thanks

ArizonaLoco said:
Hi. I am new to over clocking with SetCPU. How did you get it to go over the 1000 max? I don't understand all of the other settings enough to feel brave enough to change them other than the first tab.
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You have to flash a custom kernel (i recommend netarchy's kernel), then when you open setcpu, you can "autodetected recommended settings". You will then see the ability to overclock.

itsallsubliminal said:
Ok so it is very hard to find dedicated threads to this and I think the more of us trying this and reporting back to one thread, the more successful we will be in achieving great battery life or performance (i do it for battery life)
Here's what i have found to work well today, just some simple adjustments but my battery didn't drop a single percent for about 1.5 hours of very light use(still great tho).
MAIN TAB
Setting the Scaling to: Conservative
Max: 1000MHz
Min: 100MHz
PROFILES TAB (i only have one profile set):
Screen off - Max: 400 (don't go lower, your phone wont wakeup)- Min: 100- conservative - Priority 50
ADVANCED TAB(minimal changes, but i feel they have helped a bit):
Sampling Rate: 20000
Up Thresh: 80
Down Thresh: 25
Ignore Nice: 0
Freq Step: 20
These may not be the best settings as we will play guess n check, but thats the reason of this thread, lets figure these things out.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i used following profiles and UV settings...
still looking into it though...
http://caleb1783.tistory.com/196

I'm not using setcpu. It causes launcher pro to freak out for me. Installed CPU master and all is perfect. Running matr1x 7.5 @1.3 jiggawatts with the smartass v2 governer. Also I'm on gpa17 at the moment.
sent from my Touchwiz'd Nexus S 4g

Has anyone been undervolting?

Using Faux123's kernel, I've undervolted significantly. I went from the stock voltages and reduced all the voltages around the table by 150mv.
I can do GL Benchmark @ 1.35GHz and 487MHz (GPU) without the phone thermal throttling, which gets me better results than anandtech's freezer tests (39.6fps), mine being 42 fps on GL Benchmark Egypt HD On-Screen.
So, anyone else UV'ing?

qwahchees said:
Using Faux123's kernel, I've undervolted significantly. I went from the stock voltages and reduced all the voltages around the table by 150mv.
I can do GL Benchmark @ 1.35GHz and 487MHz (GPU) without the phone thermal throttling, which gets me better results than anandtech's freezer tests (39.6fps), mine being 42 fps on GL Benchmark Egypt HD On-Screen.
So, anyone else UV'ing?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
damn, 150mV is a lot!
I'll def UV my nexus, but probably the same values as my s2: -25 or 50mV
No reboots ?

Nope , no reboots. I'm daring to try -175, or -182.5 ish :S

how has this impacted your battery life?

When i was using faux i got to about -150mv as well. Phone never really got warm as well and battery seems to be abit better. I didn't have it on for more then 1 or 2 days. But i was 100% sable. I ran GLbench as well in a loop for about 2 hours with no lockups or reboots. Makes me think that the reason the voltage is so high is because there is a very limited number of the chips that needed more voltage so they just pumped more voltage into all the chips.

Damn! So lowering the voltages that much made it not throttle at all ???! . what was your temp after bench
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
---------- Post added at 05:12 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:47 PM ----------
qwahchees said:
Using Faux123's kernel, I've undervolted significantly. I went from the stock voltages and reduced all the voltages around the table by 150mv.
I can do GL Benchmark @ 1.35GHz and 487MHz (GPU) without the phone thermal throttling, which gets me better results than anandtech's freezer tests (39.6fps), mine being 42 fps on GL Benchmark Egypt HD On-Screen.
So, anyone else UV'ing?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Btw can I ask what governor your using ? . and just to be clear . you under clock and undervolted the cpu. But oced the GPU?
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2

I'm trying it right now. -150mv seems perfectly stable but I can't judge battery yet.

wow. sounds good. would you be able to run quadrant test as well, and see what you get please?

4470 for me: http://imgur.com/a/FiLC1
Quadrant lasts for a really short time though, < 1 minute. There can't be thermal throttling. The phone gets just barely warm to touch.
Edit: 5518 with performance governor and everything else the same.

Completely forgot about this thread.
Battery life = superb. 3 hr screen time on average, and if lucky almost 4.
No throttling at 1.35GHz, but I haven't tested 1.51GHz. I also managed to get to -187.5 uv undervolt, which is superb. I run all my clockspeeds under 1 volt.
@ italia0101
Yup. OC'd the GPU, undervolted and underclocked the CPU to 1.35GHz. Temp I didn't check. I'll run one later

qwahchees said:
Completely forgot about this thread.
Battery life = superb. 3 hr screen time on average, and if lucky almost 4.
No throttling at 1.35GHz, but I haven't tested 1.51GHz. I also managed to get to -187.5 uv undervolt, which is superb. I run all my clockspeeds under 1 volt.
@ italia0101
Yup. OC'd the GPU, undervolted and underclocked the CPU to 1.35GHz. Temp I didn't check. I'll run one later
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you possibly post a screenshot of the brightness setting that you are using to get the 3 hours? and do you keep mobile connection on or not?
Sent from my Nexus 4

From 1%-35%

So -150mv ended up not being perfectly stable. I thought it was good but it crashed about once a day. Now I'm trying -125. Yesterday I managed to do 12 hrs with 4h screen on. (wifi on and airplane mode 24/7, since I have wifi and gvoice all day).

Raikyure said:
So -150mv ended up not being perfectly stable. I thought it was good but it crashed about once a day. Now I'm trying -125. Yesterday I managed to do 12 hrs with 4h screen on. (wifi on and airplane mode 24/7, since I have wifi and gvoice all day).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Has under volting helped at all with the heat issues? Really annoying how it gets so warm after browsing for like 15 min.
I assume this voids the warranty?

I was on faux and i could under volt to a maximum of 125 stable, but honestly, i haven't found any improvement on battery life and overheating.
I'm using Franco now, that doesn't have uv, and my battery life is much much better than on faux...
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2

any update on this?

kaiowas82 said:
I was on faux and i could under volt to a maximum of 125 stable, but honestly, i haven't found any improvement on battery life and overheating.
I'm using Franco now, that doesn't have uv, and my battery life is much much better than on faux...
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Could I ask what settings you are using on Franco's kernel or is it just stock because those results look impressive!
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app

[Q] What are the default CPU frequencies and governor?

What is the default CPU min/max frequencies and the governor being used? (on stock kernel)
My guess is that the max is 1512 and min is 384. But I'm really not sure what governor is used by default.
Anyone know?

Ondemand
Sent from my Nexus 4 using XDA Premium HD app

Defaults are as follows:
MIN: 1026MHz
MAX: 1512MHz
CPU govenor: ONDEMAND

xandr00 said:
Defaults are as follows:
MIN: 1026MHz
MAX: 1512MHz
CPU govenor: ONDEMAND
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The default minimum is 1026??? Are you sure? Why would it be set to keep running so high? I heard that it doesn't fall from 1026 to 384 easily until 5-6 seconds have passed...but if 1026 is the minimum..then, smh

Is the default I/O CFQ?

Max - 1512
Min - 384 (CPU Apps don't show it correctly)
Govenor - Ondemand
I/O - Noop

Harry GT-S5830 said:
Max - 1512
Min - 384 (CPU Apps don't show it correctly)
Govenor - Ondemand
I/O - Noop
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The fact that CPU apps don't show the minimum frequency properly, and the fact that it hangs on 1026 for a few seconds before dropping to 384...do you think that indicates a problem?

I don't know if the minimum is actually 1026 or not but I know for a fact that when you TOUCH the screen, it does ramp up to 1026. So that can be a explanation why battery life isn't as good in reviews.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

zephiK said:
I don't know if the minimum is actually 1026 or not but I know for a fact that when you TOUCH the screen, it does ramp up to 1026. So that can be a explanation why battery life isn't as good in reviews.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I remember with my i9300, as soon as you touched the screen, it would ramp up to 800mhz. It has to do with project butter. It does keep everything running smooth, at the cost of battery life.

K Rich said:
I remember with my i9300, as soon as you touched the screen, it would ramp up to 800mhz. It has to do with project butter. It does keep everything running smooth, at the cost of battery life.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
never heard such of a thing on the galaxy nexus (might of been present but no one ever mentioned it so im not sure how GN reacts to that). first time ive heard of it.
battery life has been nothing but exceptional for me on N4 and GN. didnt notice a difference between 4.1 and 4.0.x for battery life. it stayed the same or slightly gotten better.
i recommend using franco kernel though

zephiK said:
never heard such of a thing on the galaxy nexus (might of been present but no one ever mentioned it so im not sure how GN reacts to that). first time ive heard of it.
battery life has been nothing but exceptional for me on N4 and GN. didnt notice a difference between 4.1 and 4.0.x for battery life. it stayed the same or slightly gotten better.
i recommend using franco kernel though
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree completely, battery life has been great. Just letting others know what might be the cause for "bad" battery life from past experiences

AnTuTu Benchmark Score Battle!

Post your best score on Antutu you got till on your Nexus 7 2013!
Let's see who can beat the current score![emoji1]
Mine is 32212!
It was obtained with Simple AOSP(5.0.2)+Glitch Kernel(AOSP) at 1.7Ghz OC CPU and GPU at 500MHz and was preety smooth too.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

Stock rooted 5.0.2 with Glitch Kernel r307 @ CPU 2000 mhz and GPU627 mhz. Not bad at all .

pk-sanja said:
Stock rooted 5.0.2 with Glitch Kernel r307 @ CPU 2000 mhz and GPU627 mhz. Not bad at all .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I lost!
You are the man!
What the heck over clock that is!
Any performance glitch in real life on that setup?

AnkeshReborn said:
I lost!
You are the man!
What the heck over clock that is!
Any performance glitch in real life on that setup?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's quit stable in real life usage but with higher battery draining . Next time i would like to try with 2,1ghz vor 2,2ghz.

pk-sanja said:
It's quit stable in real life usage but with higher battery draining . Next time i would like to try with 2,1ghz vor 2,2ghz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Let me know!

I managed to get a score of 31958. Running cm12 with the glitch kernel. Overclocked to 1890 ghz. No quite as fast as you but close
---------- Post added at 04:12 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:59 PM ----------
Overclocked to 1944 ghz and got a score of 32058. Nearly

AnkeshReborn said:
Let me know!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So new Update!
Setup: CPU 2,1Ghz, GPU 600mhz, Lbus OC Glitchy.
Impressive but it doesn't scale good any more.

Wow that's high. Don't think I can beat that

andyskelly said:
Wow that's high. Don't think I can beat that
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pk sanja beated me,I cri!

pk-sanja said:
So new Update!
Setup: CPU 2,1Ghz, GPU 600mhz, Lbus OC Glitchy.
Impressive but it doesn't scale good any more.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you post the latest ones with your kernel settings again and a screeny too of 34k!
•Hit thanks if I helped you..

AnkeshReborn said:
Can you post the latest ones with your kernel settings again and a screeny too of 34k!
•Hit thanks if I helped you..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure
My DD
ROM: Latest GROGGS88 AOSP ROM
Kernel: Glitch r320 with 1,7Ghz 1050mV, GPU 600mhz with -150mV, OC-BUS glitchy and everything else off.

pk-sanja said:
Sure
My DD
ROM: Latest GROGGS88 AOSP ROM
Kernel: Glitch r320 with 1,7Ghz, GPU 600mhz, OC-BUS glitchy and everything else off.
View attachment 3211817
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No Undervolt?
•Hit thanks if I helped you..

AnkeshReborn said:
No Undervolt?
•Hit thanks if I helped you..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Of course undervolt, i forgot, i will edit my post .

Sorry to revive this thread but i was surprised with improved performance.
In Antutu:
47542 (Configuration 24/7)
51961 (Configuration only to Benchmark...cpu min 1500mhz)
I have red numbers in my second test... why? Fail?
I use CM13 + Glitch r520
1998MHz max/81MHz min/Intellidemand/gpu 600MHz/noop
Thanks to all devs in XDA, without them our devices would not be the same.
Edit: 53295 in Configuration 24/7 but with Interactive governor.

Chrisis25 said:
Sorry to revive this thread but i was surprised with improved performance.
In Antutu:
47542 (Configuration 24/7)
51961 (Configuration only to Benchmark...cpu min 1500mhz)
I have red numbers in my second test... why? Fail?
I use CM13 + Glitch r520
1998MHz max/81MHz min/Intellidemand/gpu 600MHz/noop
Thanks to all devs in XDA, without them our devices would not be the same.
Edit: 53295 in Configuration 24/7 but with Interactive governor.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'd like to try your setup with CPU 1998MHz max/81MHz min/Intellidemand/noop & gpu 600MHz. What is your undervolt for CPU and GPU (-mV value) ? Do you use any other options for mpdecision, etc. ?

idCyber said:
I'd like to try your setup with CPU 1998MHz max/81MHz min/Intellidemand/noop & gpu 600MHz. What is your undervolt for CPU and GPU (-mV value) ? Do you use any other options for mpdecision, etc. ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Config at your own risk!!
I use:
Rom: CM13 nightly 27-08
Kernel: Glitch r520
Kernel Auditor:
Freq Max: 1998
Freq Min: 81
Governor: Interactive
Undervolt: No :crying:
Intelliplug: ON
Profile: Balanced
Hysteresis Value: 6
CPU treshold: 720
CPU max screen off freq.: 810
MSM Hotplug: ON
Debug Mask: OFF
Maximum CPU Online: 4
Minimum CPU Online: 1
Maximum CPU Screen Off: 2
CPU Boosted: 4
Down Lock Duration: 500
Boost Lock Duration: 2500
Update Rate: 10
History size: 10
Offline load: 0
Fast Lane Load: 400
Suspend Defer Time: 10ms
IO is Busy: ON
WARNING! Thermal options
Intellithermal: ON
Core Control: ON
CPU Throttle Temp.: 69 :angel:
Frequency Throttle Temp: 60
Poll: 250ms
Thermal limit Low: 1
Termal Limit High: 26
GPU: 600mhz
Governor: ondemand
I/O scheduler: noop
Read ahead: 2048
I/O Stats: ON
RQ Affinity: 1
Dynamic Fsync: ON
Gentle fair sleepers: off
arch power: off
ufff! hahahah