Hardware version is 0004,Cant not turn backlight level - EVO 4G General

I am using the ROM SuperSonic_GB_Sprint_WWE_4.12.651.1 , but there is a bug.
My EVO 4G hardware version is 0004,Can not turn backlight level.
why?

xchang168 said:
I am using the ROM SuperSonic_GB_Sprint_WWE_4.12.651.1 , but there is a bug.
My EVO 4G hardware version is 0004,Can not turn backlight level.
why?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's because there is a bug for some people on that ROM. It is a leaked test rom, and isn't perfect. Read in the thread for the respective rom, there are some work arounds.
Also, just an FYI, next time try to pay mind to where you post, and aim for the Q and A section. This is a development section, and it's intended for development related topics (roms, kernels, etc). Just a friendly reminder for your future posts.

Wrong Section, Known Bug, And FYI, It's An Unofficially Official ROM. It's A Tester That Leaked...
You should now considered asking a mod to deleting this so that nobody flames you...
(By no way am I trying to come off as an ass.)
Edit: wow, posted a sec before me sounding real similar. Lol.
Sent From My HTC Evo 4G On The Now Network From Sprint, Using Tapatalk Pro!

If you installed one of the Leaks for GingerSense or one of the Roms Based off GBsense for the Desire ? flash a new Rom thats Based on Froyo and Check.
And i'm not 100% sure but i think you might be in the wrong Board for this question but i hope this info can help you..

This has to be a troll post. No way someone asked about that issue that is posted all over the place, and just happened to provide only two attributes of their phone which are the ones that would generally be associated with that issue.
If it is not a troll post, then wow. I don't usually rag on people for dumb questions, but this one has literally been beaten to death in every thread regarding the leak.

Related

[Q] Anyone Developing ??

Simple question....does anyone know if there are any people out there that are really developing stuff for this awesome phone.....sucks that we get not feed back on mod and stuff....best T-Mobile phone out and no one is even paying attention to it.....smh.....Cyanogenmod would be awesome
itzsmokey said:
Simple question....does anyone know if there are any people out there that are really developing stuff for this awesome phone.....sucks that we get not feed back on mod and stuff....best T-Mobile phone out and no one is even paying attention to it.....smh.....Cyanogenmod would be awesome
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
devs have to have the phone in order to make things for it. I believe 2 people have it so far and are working on it.
The phones been out maybe a month, have patience
There are 4 roms in development thread, OC/UV kernel.... what else do you need?
This belongs in Q&A section, not development.
Yes... We have a oc/uv kernel. several roms. several developers.
Other known developers should be getting their phones soon.
[zinx from CMteam and enomther from ds/nexus one]
Satisfy your flashing needs with iced glacier.
Simple answer to your simple question: yes
Sent from my HTC Glacier using XDA App
scoochv said:
Simple answer to your simple question: yes
Sent from my HTC Glacier using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's where the thread should have ended. I mean, the question was posted in a forum where several threads for ROMs are...same page even, just a couple threads down.
There is soooo much you can learn by taking just 15 mins and browsing the forums for the MT4G.
you
you are developing
What a disrespectful post.
Sent from my HTC Glacier
I know
sudo apt-get sense of humor
I meant the OP. But yeah, I remember waiting months with other phones just for a simple Android update.
Yes your right there are 4 ROM's to bad they are all mostly the same with a few different tweaks, just look at other phones that devs have completely different types of ROM's....and its not a disrespectful post because all I hear is about great devs working hard on ROM's for other phones yet I don't really hear much about them working on the mt4g, not saying they are not but its nice to hear that someone is working on something....why must you guys ***** about something so simple for no reason....sheeesh
And thanks to those with a simple answer..since that was all that was needed
You are the one making a stupid post. You have a question and then you answer your own question by saying there is no one "paying attention" to it. What other phone that has been out as long as the myTouch 4g has so many "completely different" type of Roms? Most Roms tend to be built off a few main sources with tweaks like you said, the super popular Moto Droid has about 4 of those tops.
Oh my God...listen no one forced you to read this post...get off your damn high horse...this a q&a thread....not a question then ***** about it thread....if you have no answer move on to the next post....the dudes from earlier answered my question perfectly also found out zinx got the mytouch4g thanks to that post...stop being useless or keep it moving..
Also I got high hopes for zinx...dude does wonders
itzsmokey said:
Simple question....does anyone know if there are any people out there that are really developing stuff for this awesome phone.....sucks that we get not feed back on mod and stuff....best T-Mobile phone out and no one is even paying attention to it.....smh.....Cyanogenmod would be awesome
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Anyone reading
Mod will you either delete or move this thread to general please.
Sent from my HTC Glacier using XDA App
zinx is taking over as the CM retainer for the MT4G since kmobs unfortunately had issues with UPS and such. once a phone has a CM rom, so many others make a CM based rom. So be patient and in due time there will be a slough of roms for this awesome phone
@teamsilence hahaha nice man! way to integrate linux and humor

Any new info on the official 2.2???

I have been following samsung mobile on twitter and haven't heard anyone really talk about the 2.2 rom after that rumor of it being released dec 26 2010. Anyone heard anything else?
Android nerd learning new things daily
There are plenty of threads about this already and no we are never going to get official froyo
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Anyone with some REAL INFORMATION?
Android nerd learning new things daily
adleyh2000 said:
Anyone with some REAL INFORMATION?
Android nerd learning new things daily
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Forum mod has asked people specifically to stop posting these threads. When there is any real indication of Froyo coming, it will be posted.
I've read many blogs, twitter feeds, and comments about this. All I've heard is that even though it's still not ready, it's still being tested. It seems as though they're trying to iron out all of the kinks so that every phone gets the update smoothly and that EVERYTHING works. That goes for all Galaxy S phones, and not just the Epic 4G.
However, in my opinion, it seems as though they're taking their damn sweet time. Can't figure out if Samsung has incompetent programmers, management, or both. However, on the bright side, atleast Samsung is letting us know what's up and not COMPLETELY leaving us in the dark. Although, they're not setting a deadline other than "when it's done" nonsense.
In terms of whether or not it's the carrier's problem really isn't correct. I would assume the carriers don't care as long as the phone can comply with certain guidelines (AKA no hot spotting unless you pay for it), then it's good to go.
Remember, even though most of us are salivating for a new upgrade, I'd say most people have no idea that a new one is in the making. If you say all of your friends know about the upcoming upgrade, you have some mighty geeky friends!
My guess is that it should roll out in the next couple of weeks. Hell, they've had since August to work on the damn upgrade. My guess is that Samsung has a crappy programming staff, ****ty management, and limited budget for upgrading phones.
That's my take on the big mess. Here's hoping it comes soon and works as they promised.
If new useless froyo threads popping up in this forum was a drinking game we would all be dead from alcohol poisoning.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
i would only be lightly trashed.
^ awesome
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Wow, another one of these posts. Reported.
Again I will say it. Why isnt there a dedicated sticky that deals with ALL froyo speculation? All of these threads could be merged with it and all speculation could happen inside of it. Where are the mods and what are they doing? I know its not an easy job to do, but it seems like no one is in charge of this forum at all. No sticky linking to the wiki or a basic guide so that noobs can set up their phone easier. No sticky dealing with froyo speculation. Why not just add another moderator if you need the help?
styckx said:
If new useless froyo threads popping up in this forum was a drinking game we would all be dead from alcohol poisoning.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
. . . . . LOL
I am thinking you cannot make people stop commenting about something if that is what they want to talk about. Perhaps a sticky at the top of this section of the forum with the official status of froyo 2.2 has or has not been released yet so PLEASE don't ask anymore. We will change the topic of this post the first thing when it is released to let you know it is available.
I am not telling anyone what to do, I am simply trying to offer ideas towards a solution to this problem.
Exactly. Have a sticky where people CAN discuss Froyo speculation, and then any threads that are STILL posted to general can just get merged with that sticky thread or deleted.
Instead of childish responses, why arent these threads just closed. Is there no type of moderation here?
EA04,thats all Ill say for now...
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Dear Mods, I will not insult you anymore about Froyo. I'm soo over it and flash to Custom Roms weeks ago. So you don't have to say a word about these threads being started. Just Close them and ask questions later or hell don't ask or explain why you closed them. Just Do IT!
ecooce said:
EA04,thats all Ill say for now...
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
EA04 would mean it was completed 2 days ago. So 3-6 more months of testing and 30-40 more versions and we should have a final release.
mynewepic10 said:
Instead of childish responses, why arent these threads just closed. Is there no type of moderation here?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Instead of insulting our forum mod who tries his best to keep our forums clean, why don't we just let him do his job when he gets time to do it?
kenvan19 said:
Instead of insulting our forum mod who tries his best to keep our forums clean, why don't we just let him do his job when he gets time to do it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There should be another mod in ADDITION to him. I think that is the point.
Sprint will only release Froyo when there are no new xda "when is froyo coming out?" posts for an entire day. Unfortunately, at this rate it may never be released.

[Actual CM7 Nightlies] [Not molested] [The Source]

This is the link to the CM7 nightlies (which includes EVO aka Supersonic)
http://mirror.teamdouche.net/?type=nightly
This is the link to the latest Gingerbread Google APPS for the nightlies:
http://wiki.cyanogenmod.com/index.php?title=Latest_Version/Google_Apps
There is a thread in general for the nightlies, thanks for the good intention but, people is going to flame you most likely and cm only updates his thread when there is RC for CM
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
Not sure why it would be in general considering this is highly development and I might add HIGHLY functional. It is a great ROM. But I wanted it in here because there isnt an EVO specific thread on it. I also figured it important to get the google apps link in there because that is not even easy to find from the cyanogen site itself.
People can flame all they want, I dont care. For each flamer, there are probably 10 others of whom it helped.
I edited my post as I didn't realise there was a nightly for CM7 in general. I just rarely look in general.
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
How is the thread not evo specific when it is in the evo general forum? Way to waste space.
edufur said:
Not sure why it would be in general considering this is highly development and I might add HIGHLY functional. It is a great ROM. But I wanted it in here because there isnt an EVO specific thread on it. I also figured it important to get the google apps link in there because that is not even easy to find from the cyanogen site itself.
People can flame all they want, I dont care. For each flamer, there are probably 10 others of whom it helped.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
I created one right after CM6 nightlies started back in July.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=729802
I certainly agree that it isn't going to be super noticeable since it is not in the dev section. I spend a lot of time maintaining the OP to consistently provide useful and relatively up to date info, since it is frustrating to not be able to find that stuff. Cyanogen (and occasionally other devs) check in to that nightly thread or the official thread in dev once in a while to see about any issues.
Cyanogen won't create a thread in dev unless he has a "stable" (RC or full) release, and I think the (very) rough moderation policy is that any thread in dev needs to be created by the developer. I created it in dev, and after a few days it was moved to Q&A. It was there for months and then suddenly moved to General. I'm not complaining, the mods here have a ton of work to keep stuff clean. And to their credit, there is a more official thread at the CM forums for the nightlies.
edufur said:
Not sure why it would be in general considering this is highly development and I might add HIGHLY functional. It is a great ROM. But I wanted it in here because there isnt an EVO specific thread on it. I also figured it important to get the google apps link in there because that is not even easy to find from the cyanogen site itself.
People can flame all they want, I dont care. For each flamer, there are probably 10 others of whom it helped.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is in the Evo -> General section, so it is Evo specific. The top of the op has a set of links for nightlies, gapps, etc. They are not in a formatted block so they show up properly on the Tapatalk/XDA app.
Someone else created another one around the time the CM7 builds started spinning.
Hope I don't come across like a dickhead that thinks my thread is more important that this one, I just want to provide what I can to be helpful, and prevent some of the duplicate effort we get.
edufur said:
Not sure why it would be in general considering this is highly development and I might add HIGHLY functional. It is a great ROM. But I wanted it in here because there isnt an EVO specific thread on it. I also figured it important to get the google apps link in there because that is not even easy to find from the cyanogen site itself.
People can flame all they want, I dont care. For each flamer, there are probably 10 others of whom it helped.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
easy mods moved it don't like it talk to them its been in general for a very long time
Where's the link to changelogs for the nightly CM7?
bugzy said:
Where's the link to changelogs for the nightly CM7?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://twitter.com/#!/cmsrc has all the changes you'd ever want to know
laydros said:
I created one right after CM6 nightlies started back in July.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=729802
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Very odd, this didn't come up when I searched for it prior to my post. Sorry for duplicating your efforts. Your post is much more descriptive.
Thread moved to General.
*yawn*
The official gapps mirror:
http://goo-inside.me/gapps/#versions
Another CyanogenMod mirror:
http://goo-inside.me/cm/

Dear DEVS / Thread Maintainers

I would like to request that you have all of your thread titles standardized if you are offering a ROM.
A good template would be:
[ROM](ANDROID_VERSION)-(UPDATED_LAST) Name (Version number etc)
ex:
[ROM](2.3.3)-(03/31/2011) CyanogenMod 7 for Vibrant.
&
[ROM](2.2)-(04/03/2011) Trigger v2.9.2 / EDT
or something to this affect. it's confusing looking around with all of the rom version numbers being mistaken for android version numbers. Also, it's nice to see when something was updated without having to see the entire thread.
It's already pretty much like this..
there are only 2 2.2 roms, Trigger & Bionix
there is 1 gingerbread rom (cm7)
and there are 9999999 2.2.1 ROMs
dates are almost always in the topic title anyways...
that's just being nitpicky.. speaking of which, this is posted in the wrong section.
ironically, you just posted an extra thread that contraindicates your cleanup suggestion.
xtone said:
that's just being nitpicky.. speaking of which, this is posted in the wrong section.
ironically, you just posted an extra thread that contraindicates your cleanup suggestion.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Posted it where it would be read by the correct people. Less cleanup, more organisation of ROMs.
To other responder, two things: you're wrong (i.e. there are two Gingerbread ROMs for the Vibrant: CM7, MIUI), and even if that were true, not everybody knows which ROM is which all of the time. This would make things easier for users who don't view the forum every day and don't keep up with every ROM.
numberoneoppa said:
Posted it where it would be read by the correct people. Less cleanup, more organisation of ROMs.
To other responder, two things: you're wrong (i.e. there are two Gingerbread ROMs for the Vibrant: CM7, MIUI), and even if that were true, not everybody knows which ROM is which all of the time. This would make things easier for users who don't view the forum every day and don't keep up with every ROM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wrong section is wrong section.. it's like ****ting in the street instead of the toilet and saying "i have to **** in public so more people can see my crap"
only an idiot would flash anything blindly.
learn to read:
1. the title
2. the OP
3. the last 5-10 pages (at least) of latest user feedbacks
how complicated is it to read really?
xtone said:
learn to read.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In reference to...?
edit:
I'm not going to argue with you. I have a valid point and whether you choose to see it or not is your own business.
edit2:
your analogy is really, really bad.
numberoneoppa said:
In reference to...?
edit:
I'm not going to argue with you. I have a valid point and whether you choose to see it or not is your own business.
edit2:
your analogy is really, really bad.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nah, your acting like a hypocrite.
So your posting this in the wrong section, because YOU want organization.
Did you ever go, into dev section? All the titles are put fine, and theres already been a precedent, and its been set. The titles cannot be changed.
Thread is useless and takes up space.
(Useless post being nitpicky) (android 1.5-3.0) (4.4.11) (please delete) is how u should re-label this. N fyi there are 3 gingerbread roms. Cm7, miui and dbl rainbow.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App

Universal development section.

We have a development section for every carrier, how about one for any carrier.
In my vision this would currently contain all the efforts of trying to make this possible, and in the future, all universal roms(which we will hopefully have).
Also I feel that this would promote development of a way to do this.
For those who make separate threads in every carrier section because they care enough to do so, wouldn't actually have to do so. What a great way to say thanks!!! (and give them more time to develop the rom instead of posting multiple threads.
badname said:
We have a development section for every carrier, how about one for any carrier.
In my vision this would currently contain all the efforts of trying to make this possible, and in the future, all universal roms(which we will hopefully have).
Also I feel that this would promote development of a way to do this.
For those who make separate threads in every carrier section because they care enough to do so, wouldn't actually have to do so. What a great way to say thanks!!! (and give them more time to develop the rom instead of posting multiple threads.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bad idea man. IDK how familiar you are to flashing roms and mods, but it sounds like you know that you can't flash a Sprint rom on an AT&T device (Etc etc). That's great and all, but for everyone that knows how to flash the right rom, there are 20 people who have no idea that a bad flash will brick their phone, and those people would be looking at an "all USA carriers" forum picking the coolest looking rom, not even paying attention to warnings.
Heck, take a look at all the "Omg, I bricked my phone flashing an international rom. Halp me!" threads. There's already a problem, and you have to go to a completely section of the forums to find those. Putting them one click away is just asking for hundreds of whiny "I borked my phone" threads. At least until a one mod fits all method is made standard.
So, no. I don't think it's a good idea. In a perfect world, it would be amazing, development from all carriers would get the same attention, and everyone would be happy. However, we've gotta cater to the lowest common denominator right now. Sorry guy.
I take it neither of you read the forums or xda front-page much?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=27938380
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
what if this
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1735482
badname said:
what if this
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1735482
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tapatalk fail. I copied the post and not the topic link. Thanks.
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
Pirateghost said:
I take it neither of you read the forums or xda front-page much?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=27938380
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
haha, posted at the same time
thats what gave me the idea, thats the stuff im talking about.
I am confident the devs here will be able to do this.
And thats where the new section would come in.
BlaydeX15 said:
Bad idea man.
(Some text)
...At least until a one mod fits all method is made standard.
(Some more text)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pirateghost said:
I take it neither of you read the forums or xda front-page much?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=27938380
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just sayin, lol.
fine, ill suggest this poll again when there is a way to have universal roms.
Nice to see my article having an impact lol
Frankly, for now, the best way is to keep them separate. ROM devs can always release them in each forum if they want to make ROMs for all 4 carriers (there can't be that many differences).
Even if a universal ROM method was released, I would still vote to keep them separate. ROMs are, by far, the most popular development in the forums, but you've still got kernels, mods, scripts, etc that won't have universal compatibility. Better to keep em separate as to not confuse people (because we all know someone is gonna release something without specifying which version it's for and someone is gonna flash it) and cause problems.
Maybe if there was a way to make everything universal, maybe. As it stands, I'd rather see a ROM dev simply have to copy/paste his ROM thread across 4 sections rather than have to see [T-Mobile][Sprint][AT&T][Verizon] at the beginning of every thread.
My 2 cents
Why don’t we give this a try?

Categories

Resources