Is there a way too we can get better camera, and working multitouch??
-Sorry about my bad english i'm latvian.
the dev are working for it. just be patient
feliks200 said:
Is there a way too we can get better camera, and working multitouch??
-Sorry about my bad english i'm latvian.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can try this ROM and give it a shot
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=964223
i
i alredy tryed that rom. what to say many many many bugs.
feliks200 said:
i alredy tryed that rom. what to say many many many bugs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
he was suggesting that ROM, because ur thread title asking better camera and multitouch ! sorry bad english
There is NO WAY to get multitouch on our device. Also there is no normal dualtouch for now, only rough software emulation. Maybe some lucky genius could fix chip's firmware to force it return 2 finger coordinates.
Or just crack/bypass bootloader xd
And dual touch = smaller multitouch
Sent from my X8 using Tapatalk
this thread says better camera and multi touch,
well, the answer is get a new phone.
junixquiaoit said:
this thread says better camera and multi touch,
well, the answer is get a new phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol.... lol...
How many times we have to say that our phone will propable never get multytouch.
We will sure get dualtouch when devs crack bootloader
DarkThanos said:
Lol.... lol...
We how many times we have to say that our phone will propable never get multytouch.
We will sure get dualtouch when devs crack bootloader
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
dual touch is better then single and the emulated dual touch isn't to bad double tab is still better on browser tho as for the camera thats a big no no is fixed focus it will never get better :/
treebill said:
dual touch is better then single and the emulated dual touch isn't to bad double tab is still better on browser tho as for the camera thats a big no no is fixed focus it will never get better :/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is best dualtouch or multytouch depeds on the default paraments of each... can be set good or bad.
As for the camera there are good apps that shoorten the shot time, so you can take shot easier (photo is better too)
yes, you're right. let's hope that cracking the bootloader may give us dual/multi.
but dont let your hopes too high,
...i think that when the bootloader is cracked we will have dualtouch for sure but blagus said it drain too much cpu...
Are you sure that "for sure" ?
doixanh said:
Are you sure that "for sure" ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ahh come on "module man" !!
doixanh said:
Are you sure that "for sure" ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why not?... From my point of view , as nobody is sure that we will not manage to make support for dualtouch, thats means "for sure".... but i didnt difine time...
Related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-j-DGrWry6k
it's a fake?
realizzable on blackstone?
Who cares
why dont you check an Iphone Forum
isnort- just only short and poor animation on the screen. You can't do anything by yourself...
Yes, Realizable but... what f**king and useless application is that?!?!
1M+ app in AppleStore... if it's the goal I pray to have never a WinMo AppStore....
D'rath
ozmoran said:
Who cares
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ME
ozmoran said:
why dont you check an Iphone Forum
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
just asked if realizzable on blackstone.
please take for yourself you stupid comments.
Czlowiekzezlota said:
isnort- just only short and poor animation on the screen. You can't do anything by yourself...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
is what i was thinking.
D'rath said:
Yes, Realizable but... what f**king and useless application is that?!?!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you're right. it's just a stupid app like many others.
however just asking. thank almost all for your answers
ionutmarius86 said:
you're right. it's just a stupid app like many others.
however just asking. thank almost all for your answers
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So you realize its a stupid app
yet you want to see if the HD can run a stupid app
Now I am confused hahaha
and 268 people have looked at this thread and didnt bother replying so it does seem like no one does care (sorry except you of course)
It's fake because the iPhone can only detect heat from the fingers. So when he used the card and the pipe, they won't be detected by the iPhone.
That's the beauty with resistive touch screens on WinMo phones.
It's very real!
Theres no "sensing" anything. It's a simple animation - nothing else!
I had a very similar application for my old Diamond, showing an x-ray of a hand.
The illusion was to move the phones camera over a hand, and making your "audience" to believe that the phone was actually able to make x-ray photos... 8)
I dont know if this has been covered yet but i thought you guys would be interested in this information
www youtube com /watch?v=2z-9XgbehQ4
the video shows an X10 running android 2.1, its not clear as to wether its rooted or not but its definately running it
(cant post links, so u have to edit the link before pasting it into your browser )
Pretty nifty! Took forever to boot, hey? Besides the boot logo the fw didnt look SE whored out. Perhaps it is root? Or maybe an early se build?
This video was posted today in youtube.lets hope the guy tell us how he did it
that's a crappy video, hard to see. must have been taken with a crappy phone lol
I must get in touch with that guy to ask him about multitouch capabilities. If this is the official clean 2.1 we can get the final response (the only limit, in this case, could be the bootloader but I don't think so).
the first logo looks like an Arrow sign , may be downloading something to the phone or something else that is why it took that long
Alleniv said:
I must get in touch with that guy to ask him about multitouch capabilities. If this is the official clean 2.1 we can get the final response (the only limit, in this case, could be the bootloader but I don't think so).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
SE as stated several times that the screen is not hardwarewise capable of MT.
yeah great no multitouch we get it, does anyone have ANY idea how this was done?
LRI said:
SE as stated several times that the screen is not hardwarewise capable of MT.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And Synaptics has stated several times to me <<just wait and see>>. I believe in multitouch, IMHO it's only a patent problem
For the record Synaptics managed to soft enable multi touch gestures on there standard trackpad panels, its more than possible to enable it with a little bit of fancy work (eg registering each touch seperatly at high speed and then relaying it as a single multi touch gesture to the OS). Multitouch is what everyone is obsessing over today then eh? weather its possible or not is no one else at all at interested in who even did this let alone how?! Peace and love.
Greenarcher707™ said:
that's a crappy video, hard to see. must have been taken with a crappy phone lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ya .. except the boot logo .. cant seem to see anythng else ..
it can also be some emulator+remote desktop video, as it was with htc hd2 running wp7. i am staying calm in this case, no additional info, nothing written there.. even the video quality. from my point of view it is not real.
proyaz said:
ya .. except the boot logo .. cant seem to see anythng else ..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
except the fact that its a stock android build and theres no SE UXP stuff?
charlie42 said:
it can also be some emulator+remote desktop video, as it was with htc hd2 running wp7. i am staying calm in this case, no additional info, nothing written there.. even the video quality. from my point of view it is not real.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
10chars.
If its fake i say we get a hold of his email and email him in bulk stating how much of a **** he is, i however dont think its fake, if it was you would expect much more input/response latency than we are seeing, it looks native, and if he where to fake it he would have used 2.2......
Yes, but if you run it in emulator and access it via wifi in local network, the responses also can be quite good.. And as far as I know, hacking the bootloader is really not easy, and honestly - if I'd done it, at first I would write some informations about what I've done.. And not just some "nothing saying" video on youtube..
yeah i think its a little bit conspicuous but.. im not looking for reasons that its fake, lets just take it at face value for the moment. i still am of the view that remote connection isn't as fast as navigation in that video, im going to test this out tonight.
do vanilla 2.1 have a blue status bar like in our 1.6 X10 ? if not it maybe an early SE 2.1 build that they promised because i clearly see a blue status bar and as you guys mentioned the boot-loader is hard to crack
not sure about that ive heard the phone can have multitouch
LRI said:
SE as stated several times that the screen is not hardwarewise capable of MT.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
its blocked
skylinegtrvspec said:
its blocked
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you please give your delusions a rest? I mean... I respect that you wanna give yourself false hope, but please don't give disappointments to the community around you.
It's a fact that it's been officially announced that the hardware doesn't have the capapilities.
I can introduce you a good search engine called 'Google', and to can visit the official Sony Ericsson blogs for the facts.
Sigh...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-NroxUUoBAg&feature=sub*MIGHT BE FAKE*
I tested this multi touch my self.
But what we don't know is that in the video is it the 2.1 update or just another fake.
In the video below recorded by me. *YES THAT'S ME*
I tested multi touch with an application.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=trVNFikrmW4
Sorry quality is bad.
You can test it your self.
Link for Applicaton(NOT MADE BY ME):
http://www.mediafire.com/?438drz12r75a18q
Maybe it's a fake, maybe it's not. But your "test" doesn't prove anything.
It's been said like 50 times already that Android 1.6 doesn't support multitouch, so how could you test it?
Puck24 said:
Maybe it's a fake, maybe it's not. But your "test" doesn't prove anything.
It's been said like 50 times already that Android 1.6 doesn't support multitouch, so how could you test it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
..............................
+1 but still i will appreciate him for his efforts
Puck24 said:
Maybe it's a fake, maybe it's not. But your "test" doesn't prove anything.
It's been said like 50 times already that Android 1.6 doesn't support multitouch, so how could you test it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The video description said it's maybe 2.1 firmware but I just wanted to test it on 1.6 because in the video the person may have been using 1.6 and I think MT can work on Xperia x10 in my opinion but not on 1.6.
npk21 said:
..............................
+1 but still i will appreciate him for his efforts
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks.
How many times doe sthe MANUFACTURER and assembler of the instrument in question have to tell you that multitouch is not possible due to the HARDWARE?
Amazing. If this level of conviction could be harnessed by real people the world's ills could all be cured in one day!
Its really doesn't matter as this should be posted in the multi touch thread that already exists
OP if you have issue with me closing ur thread feel free to PM me then i can tell you how you broke the rules
Update : Cam now works for all CM ROM.
Thanks for doixanh for his/her work!!
Because of Sony Ericsson.
howardmatthew168 said:
Hi guys.. I want to ask something.
Why all of Gingerbread ROM had the camera VGA limited??
Sorry for my bad english...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Devs can't use the existing camera libs from 2.1 ROM neither apply patch on them as they did for froyo, so they need to rewrite them for Gingerbread..but this is extremely difficult..
correct me if I'm wrong...
anant123 said:
Devs can't use the existing camera libs from 2.1 ROM neither apply patch on them as they did for froyo, so they need to rewrite them for Gingerbread..but this is extremely difficult..
correct me if I'm wrong...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ur right
Sent from my X8 using Tapatalk
yeah!, i use GingerCruzt ... and the camera limited too, i dont know why ..
make.disappointed
SaktiMcQueen said:
yeah!, i use GingerCruzt ... and the camera limited too, i dont know why ..
make.disappointed
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Omfg cuz its gingerbread?! You need to rewrite libcamera which needs a lot of effort
Sent from my X8 using Tapatalk
if u wanna it, u can try another ROM which no limited camera
SaktiMcQueen said:
yeah!, i use GingerCruzt ... and the camera limited too, i dont know why ..
make.disappointed
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try froyobread its the best rom im testing kuyadroid right now and its pretty good.
Sent from my X8 using Tapatalk
Owh.... I think Gingerbread camera just stuck at VGA because the system don't capture 3MP. But, can we just get another phone libs to our phone?? (Sorry i'm newbie, just want to more learn) Also sorry for bad english
howardmatthew168 said:
Owh.... I think Gingerbread camera just stuck at VGA because the system don't capture 3MP. But, can we just get another phone libs to our phone?? (Sorry i'm newbie, just want to more learn) Also sorry for bad english
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've already said why and no we can't...if it was that easy devs would have done it from the beginning!
FroyoBreads camera is 2048x1536
so froyo based ROMs doesn't have the VGA limitations?
anyone knows where to download these camera libs?? I'll try to rewrite...
qweasd1111 said:
so froyo based ROMs doesn't have the VGA limitations?
anyone knows where to download these camera libs?? I'll try to rewrite...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're funny.
If experienced devs found it hard, how can someone like you "rewrite it"
If you need cam, use froyo...
Sent from my X8 using Tapatalk
Dare-Devil Inside said:
You're funny.
If experienced devs found it hard, how can someone like you "rewrite it"
If you need cam, use froyo...
Sent from my X8 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
and why people would like to use custom gingerbread? what's the different?
neilhoja said:
and why people would like to use custom gingerbread? what's the different?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's gingerbread. It's up-to-date and a lot's of new features are avaliable
Dare-Devil Inside said:
You're funny.
If experienced devs found it hard, how can someone like you "rewrite it"
If you need cam, use froyo...
Sent from my X8 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
man just get rid of your "mocking" the others habit cause it's really UN-cool ! wth "some one like you" like if he was a **** grade begger begging at your door.....just respect the people DDI or ignore them at least !!
Dare-Devil Inside said:
You're funny.
If experienced devs found it hard, how can someone like you "rewrite it"
If you need cam, use froyo...
Sent from my X8 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you talk like you know me.
maybe it's not that hard just it takes a lot of work
They have to rewrite libcamera cos they can't patch libcamera from stock sources. Thus, VGA for us until some genius rewrites/patches libcamera. And DDI, just let him try, it won't hurt. Besides, he's willing to spend time and effort so don't just act superior with your condescending and discouraging tone. Support those ppl who attempt to make a difference for ppl like us .
Froyobreads ROMs dont have VGA limit because they aren't Gingerbread/CM7 -> Froyobread based on CM6 (in CM6 camera have no limits).
Gingerbread have limits because devs schould edit ROM source to fix them. This is so dificult. We just waiting .
spyder12345 said:
They have to rewrite libcamera cos they can't patch libcamera from stock sources. Thus, VGA for us until some genius rewrites/patches libcamera. And DDI, just let him try, it won't hurt. Besides, he's willing to spend time and effort so don't just act superior with your condescending and discouraging tone. Support those ppl who attempt to make a difference for ppl like us .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Froyobreads ROMs dont have VGA limit because they aren't Gingerbread/CM7 -> Froyobread based on CM6 (in CM6 camera have no limits).
Gingerbread have limits because devs schould edit ROM source to fix them. This is so dificult. We just waiting .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So are devs are working on it? i see the dev only developing froyo, also i know Froyobread is not VGA limited, it just a Froyo that customized to be like Gingerbread, but really, i hate the rom. I felt the rom has a minus point, but i can't find it.
DDI, if u said better use froyo, use by yourself! your post just make my mood low!
My bad english!
As the page doesnt let me post my question on the original post (i know the redundancy) (http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1354267) , i gotta ask if ANY nand rom of ice cream sandwich will have face recognition¿
Thanks
Are you serious? With the camera on the back? This would be quite difficult.
When I tried Beta10 of ICS I didn't see any option like this, but I haven't explicity look for it.
Also, NFC won't work, too
I know it would be hard but also it would be awesome lol
saulmm said:
As the page doesnt let me post my question on the original post (i know the redundancy) (http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1354267) , i gotta ask if ANY nand rom of ice cream sandwich will have face recognition¿
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
With a back facing camera, and no front facing camera? Are you trolling or something? Why the hell would you even want that anyway, it would just make unlocking the phone even more effort than a pattern or pin security :/
Yes but idk i thought it would be awesome, now i think not a great idea.
saulmm said:
Yes but idk i thought it would be awesome, now i think not a great idea.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You know what. You are right. Also it would be awesome for someone of developers program Leo to make breakfast or something like that. And to dont use battery or at least I mean at least makes it solar charge.
I think you asked the most stupid question ever on Leo forums (and I read a lot)
I was just asking a curiosity i had ¬¬ , i thought i could ask every doubt i got.
saulmm said:
I was just asking a curiosity i had ¬¬ , i thought i could ask every doubt i got.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes generaly you can ask everysthing. But think about it. You know that on this forum there is 1000 same questions ? I mean how can you eventualy think to have FR without front camera ? Can you drive car without wheels ? No!
Ehh so? Ill use with the back camera and i know a lot of people that wouldnt care of using the back camera because that idea is new and fresh and not all phones have it. Thats why i asked it, so you think my question ia stupid? Fair enough but nex time you read another "stupid" question think it twice what youll submit.