[Q] Decreased benchmark and linpack scores - myTouch 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting

So, this is not a big deal for me, more just general curiosity. I noticed about a week ago both my Linpack scores and Quadrant scores took a massive dive. I used to be able to get Linpack in the 50s easy and Quads of 2800+ when I OC'd to 1.8ghz. Seemingly randomly, now when I OC to 1.8ghz I get around 1500 Quads and in the 30s in Linpack. My performance does not feel compromised at all though. Still smooth as butter and everything seems to be fine. Just wanting to know if anyone else has had this happen, or if there are any ideas on what might be causing it.
I have tested this on CM7RC1, RoyalThunder, IcedGlacier, RoyalLiquid, and now RoyalGinger all with a similar result. I am truly baffled as to how this is following me from ROM to ROM. I do a complete wipe before every flash (wipe data/cache/davik, and with RoyalGinger formatted data and system as well).

TJBunch1228 said:
So, this is not a big deal for me, more just general curiosity. I noticed about a week ago both my Linpack scores and Quadrant scores took a massive dive. I used to be able to get Linpack in the 50s easy and Quads of 2800+ when I OC'd to 1.8ghz. Seemingly randomly, now when I OC to 1.8ghz I get around 1500 Quads and in the 30s in Linpack. My performance does not feel compromised at all though. Still smooth as butter and everything seems to be fine. Just wanting to know if anyone else has had this happen, or if there are any ideas on what might be causing it.
I have tested this on CM7RC1, RoyalThunder, IcedGlacier, RoyalLiquid, and now RoyalGinger all with a similar result. I am truly baffled as to how this is following me from ROM to ROM. I do a complete wipe before every flash (wipe data/cache/davik, and with RoyalGinger formatted data and system as well).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As I have always said synthetic benchmark never translates in to real world performance as you yourself is aware of that. Those numbers means nothing so don't worry about it.

XDA-WTF said:
As I have always said synthetic benchmark never translates in to real world performance as you yourself is aware of that. Those numbers means nothing so don't worry about it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey you're back! Under a new screeny now!!!
Thanks for the reply, but as I mentioned I'm not concerned. But just because it doesn't affect my usage doesn't mean I'm not generally interested to learn why it's happening. Knowledge is power, brother!
Sent from my HTC Glacier using XDA App

TJBunch1228 said:
Hey you're back! Under a new screeny now!!!
Thanks for the reply, but as I mentioned I'm not concerned. But just because it doesn't affect my usage doesn't mean I'm not generally interested to learn why it's happening. Knowledge is power, brother!
Sent from my HTC Glacier using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I am back that is another subject of its own.
But for your topic you are seeing this on AOSP2.3.3 base? Which kernel are you using? Ill try to replicate the conditions on my end as you know I test things thoroughly. But for now using CM7NB14 with dum/faux's kernel I still get over 3k scaled at 1804MHz.

XDA-WTF said:
Yeah I am back that is another subject of its own.
But for your topic you are seeing this on AOSP2.3.3 base? Which kernel are you using? Ill try to replicate the conditions on my end as you know I test things thoroughly. But for now using CM7NB14 with dum/faux's kernel I still get over 3k scaled at 1804MHz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Currently I'm on TR's RoyalGinger with faux's gb kernel that comes with it. But as mentioned earlier I see this on both 2.2 and 2.3 ROMs, AOSP, Sense, Acer Liquid. Just weird that it's following me.
Sent from my HTC Glacier using XDA App

TJBunch1228 said:
Currently I'm on TR's RoyalGinger with faux's gb kernel that comes with it. But as mentioned earlier I see this on both 2.2 and 2.3 ROMs, AOSP, Sense, Acer Liquid. Just weird that it's following me.
Sent from my HTC Glacier using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats odd did you see this even after erase system -w? Next time you flash make sure /system is formatted and do total full wipe and then reflash it.

Today was actually the first time I've done a complete wipe including formatting system and data. The ONLY thing I did not do was format my SD. If there is any reason that could cause the issue I can try that.
Sent from my HTC Glacier using XDA App

TJBunch1228 said:
Today was actually the first time I've done a complete wipe including formatting system and data. The ONLY thing I did not do was format my SD. If there is any reason that could cause the issue I can try that.
Sent from my HTC Glacier using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well Quadrant normally does not access /sdcard-ext0 for the read/write database test and only time that comes in to play is if you have the rom loaded from SDCard and not have it allocated on NAND but on RAM. Now I am not fully aware of TR's project as if they use /sdcard-ext or not to better allocate memory. But in that case you can go ahead and format the sdcard and see what happens.
I get higher than the score you seeing on 1017MHz. I recommend you do nandroid backup. Do full wipe and then reflash CM7NB14 and with kernel of your choice then run the benchmark. If you see its fixed then TR is who you should hit so just reverting using nandroid backup you can revert back or you can reinstall it fresh this time with sdcard data backed up and then refromatted.

Related

New Aria user here...

Hello there XDA I just switched to the Aria from the Captivate. I am new to Android modding, so please bear with me.
I like the phone, It doesnt bother me losing screen space. However it is a bit slow with the 600 MHZ processor.
So if there are some people kind enough to guide me to/through the following it would be appreciated.
1. I would like to overclock it a bit, maybe to 800.
2. General performance tweaks
3. Get rid of Att bloatware
4. Root ( z4root is not in the market anymore and ATT disables side loading.)
Sent from my HTC Liberty using XDA App
Everything u need is in the android Dev. Section for the aria its really simple. To find and to follow..I use cm6 rc2. It overclocks very nicely
Sent from my Liberty using XDA App
Hey Joshua, being new to the Aria as well (less than a month), I haven't looked into overclocking it... but I am running CM 6.1 RC 2, what do I need to do to start overclocking?
Install SetCPU to overclock. I wouldn't go over 825mhz as it starts getting unstable.
As for rooting, search for posts by user asiancuta. He did a really good write up that included a key point I didn't see anywhere else. It's titled NOOBZ: easy guide to rooting your aria.... Read all instructions, and make sure you understand it first.
To install cyanogenmod 6.1 rc2 do a search for That aria - she's so racy!
Sent from my Liberty using XDA App
Mike's Aria said:
Install SetCPU to overclock. I wouldn't go over 825mhz as it starts getting unstable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In the other overclocking thread (or overcloking as the OP spelled it ) several people posted that they were running at 864... what type of instability is likely? Also, doesn't overclocking HAVE to have some sort of adverse effect? Like reduced reliability or an increased likelihood of hardware failure? If there are no adverse effects, why would HTC not set the CPU higher from the factory?
I want to try it, but I feel like I pushed the limits of my comfort zone just by rooting and installing CM...
911jason said:
In the other overclocking thread (or overcloking as the OP spelled it ) several people posted that they were running at 864... what type of instability is likely? Also, doesn't overclocking HAVE to have some sort of adverse effect? Like reduced reliability or an increased likelihood of hardware failure? If there are no adverse effects, why would HTC not set the CPU higher from the factory?
I want to try it, but I feel like I pushed the limits of my comfort zone just by rooting and installing CM...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I always lean on the side of caution when it comes to overclocking a phone. I don't want to fry the processor since I can't replace it as easily as one on a computer.
Processors are never set from the factory to run at their fastest.
Sent from my Liberty using XDA App
While it might seem odd since all these phones have the same hardware they don't all respond the same to overclocking. Some people can do 864. I can't even get my phone to do anything over 825 and even 825 gives me issues. I like to keep mine between 768-787. Over doing it can cause damage and shorten the life of the processor but keeping it around 800 is probably safe as long as you moniter temps. Heat is the real enemy here. Manufacturers are trying to balance cost, reliability, battery life. Our little phone use a smaller battery and so a lower clock speed keeps the phone running longer. And the aria is a mid range phone, they don't want it to be faster than the more expensive phones. Also Higher clock speeds will drain your battery faster. At 768 the phone is noticeably snappier and the battery drain over stock isn't even noticeable.
Huh. That's good to know, Callmearia. However I don't even know where to start on any of this. I've never 'flashed' a phone or anything like that before.
Sent from my HTC Liberty using XDA App
This is a really good guide explaining how to root your phone and install a custom recovery, Clockwork, with which you can flash ROMs, make backups, and a bunch of other stuff:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=788737
You will still not be able to sideload apps just by rooting though. You will need to flash a ROM in order to do that. Check out the Android Development section, it is all there.
L551 said:
Huh. That's good to know, Callmearia. However I don't even know where to start on any of this. I've never 'flashed' a phone or anything like that before.
Sent from my HTC Liberty using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think most people can hit 864 now using CM6.1 RC2. I think some tweaks were made to allow it. Before I was only hitting 825mhz or 844mhz when I ran in to stability problems... but now I have none. Or, it could be due to the fact it's colder here now.
Alright, so after some adb troubles with Ubuntu 10.10, I am now rooted, woo!
So now, where to go from here?
This worked flawlessly and easy. Less than 5 minutes
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=7449486&postcount=1
EDIT : I see that you already got rooted.
You have two choices for Attn1's custom ROMS
Liberated or Cyanogenmod
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=819715
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=821642
Take in mind that CM has more customizable features, INCLUDING OVERCLOCKING. Liberated doesn't.
Place the .zip on your SD card. Enter clockworkmod recovery by holding down the volume down button after restarting phone. Wipe Data, Cache, Dalvik Cache. Go to install zip from Sdcard. Pick the file. It should install. wait, and reboot and continue.
Customize it to your liking. Download apps/widgets
Turn off unnecessary background items. (Auto Sync)
Decrease Brightness
Only use GSM networks
(these are battery saving tips....lots more)
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=505419
That is the SetCPU for XDA members.
To install, go through ADB in the command line, or download FASTAPP Install from the Market and place the .apk on your sd card and install it from there.
kaschenberg said:
I think most people can hit 864 now using CM6.1 RC2. I think some tweaks were made to allow it. Before I was only hitting 825mhz or 844mhz when I ran in to stability problems... but now I have none. Or, it could be due to the fact it's colder here now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's probably true. I haven't tried going over 825 since way back with dumfuqs kernel.
Alrighty... did all that, now running cyanogenmod on my Aria! \o/
No more ATT bloatware.
I made sure to do a nandroid backup just in case.
Also overclocked to 768MHz. Phone seems a bit quicker.
Thanks guys
Any other tips?
Oh also adb stopped working again on Ubuntu >.< Anyone know how to fix that?
Sent from my Liberty using XDA App
L551 said:
Alrighty... did all that, now running cyanogenmod on my Aria! \o/
No more ATT bloatware.
I made sure to do a nandroid backup just in case.
Also overclocked to 768MHz. Phone seems a bit quicker.
Thanks guys
Any other tips?
Oh also adb stopped working again on Ubuntu >.< Anyone know how to fix that?
Sent from my Liberty using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Make sure you install the google apps package.
Also, Not too sure.
I use windows. Works perfectly on there. try that
Yup I made sure to install that. Need my market.
I'll see if it works on windows later.
Sent from my Liberty using XDA App
L551 said:
Alrighty... did all that, now running cyanogenmod on my Aria! \o/
No more ATT bloatware.
I made sure to do a nandroid backup just in case.
Also overclocked to 768MHz. Phone seems a bit quicker.
Thanks guys
Any other tips?
Oh also adb stopped working again on Ubuntu >.< Anyone know how to fix that?
Sent from my Liberty using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try leaving the OC alone after the reflash.. It's defaulted to 864mhz and it works flawlessly for me.
It was default 600MHz for me.
EDIT: Holding down 1 to access voicemail no longer works, as there is no voicemail number in the options. What is it?
Sent from my Liberty using XDA App
L551 said:
It was default 600MHz for me.
EDIT: Holding down 1 to access voicemail no longer works, as there is no voicemail number in the options. What is it?
Sent from my Liberty using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its different for every one. My VM is a local number. You can always just use your phone number.
I recently set my VM to go thru my Google Voice number now.
Sent from my Liberty using XDA App
Using my own number worked.
However, now my phone is freezing randomly, and causing the launcher to hang. (ADW and LauncherPro both do this)
It seems android.process.acore always takes alot of CPU time when it does this.

Droid X lag

One of my buddies at work has a rooted Droid X, and I couldn't believe how laggy it is, even compared to the stock JFD Vibrant.
I am not here to pick up the fights with "my phone is better than yours" type of replies, I am just looking for any pointers how to help my buddy because my Vibrant with Nerov3+voodoo (2.2 ROM with /system, /data, /dbdata and /cache converted to EXT4) runs circles around his DX.
I am not sure if it is an app or something that cause this (he does not have much installed), but even looking at the youtube vids of DX his phone feels like it's limping on a half a leg.
So far I know he is running the latest OTA and his phone is rooted, I checked his /system, /data etc are EXT3 - I assume the stock DX has a proper FS unlike my Vibrant when it was stock.
It's probably the blur elements. A custom ROM fixes that quite quickly.
blockhead42 said:
It's probably the blur elements. A custom ROM fixes that quite quickly.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you! I will suggest him to join xda and flash a custom ROM.
Sent from my Nero powered Vibrant
Blur shouldn't make it lag that much. Some of his settings might be slowing him down. If he is trying to be real conservative on his battery and set it to "conservative" - it is going to throttle back his CPU usage to try and maintain better battery life.
Need to check a few things like that.
what kind of scores do you get in quadrant on your phone (if you aren't boosting them with the stagefright etc)?
thepolishguy said:
Blur shouldn't make it lag that much. Some of his settings might be slowing him down. If he is trying to be real conservative on his battery and set it to "conservative" - it is going to throttle back his CPU usage to try and maintain better battery life.
Need to check a few things like that.
what kind of scores do you get in quadrant on your phone (if you aren't boosting them with the stagefright etc)?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I will see him after the New Year's and will check.
I am not sure what Quadrant scores he is getting, but the phone obviously not performing to its full potential. I get around 1500 Quadrant with EXT4 converted filesystem, it is under a 1000 stock. The boost in score is def the filesystem read/write + a small bump due to JIT on 2.2.
Once rooted try to get setcpu and leave it at 800Mhz permanently. That fixed my issues with lag. Of course a new Rom wouldn't hurt since Stock Verizon/Blur Rom sucks balls.
Sent from my DROIDX using XDA App
A few things I do to speed up the x are; turn off push for e-mail, freeze the stock applications I do not use via titanium backup, and use fast reboot when it slows down anyway. I still have some lag issues but these help. I'm ready for the incredible Hd so I can drop the x, this Motorola device just has never met the mark for me plus I miss sense.
Sent from my DROIDX using XDA App
sandman2025 said:
I'm ready for the incredible Hd so I can drop the x.
Sent from my DROIDX using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's my plan too... I wish Motorola gave a similar option like on the original nexus one bootloader...
Sent from my DROIDX using XDA App

Quadrant scores

Ok so ive rooted this toy, flashed the 1.2ghz kernal and ran quadrant on it. I hit anywhere from 1080 to 1180. Have setcpu on demand at 800 min and 1200 max so why on earth is my rooted nook color running android 2.1 and a flashed 1100mhz kernal hitting wayyyy higher scores? (Around 1280) doesnt seem logical at all. Specially cause this is an actual tablet and thats just a rooted e reader. Did I do something wrong?
Sent from my SCH-I800 using XDA App
Quadrant is a bad benchmark. It weights i/o far too heavily.
The Tabs RFS filesystems bring its Quadrant score way below where it should be, though in actual use it's very fast.
If you move to EXT4, your Quadrant scores will shoot up by around 80%.
Regards,
Dave
O sweet love of mary. 80% you say. Ok ive seen some posts redarding this ext4 thingymabob. Ill check it out. So if im understanding you correctly by changing to this my tab will perform even better than it does now? Or ill just see a genaric increase on this quadrant test that really means nothing? Sorry im noobish lol
Sent from my SCH-I800 using XDA App
Well, my tab is currently on ext4 and my quadrant scores completely destroys my rfs score taken earlier.
However, that said, i don't really feel any performance improvements except the satisfaction knowing that my toy is now on an open and faster file system as opposed to a propriatory and slower one ;-)
Sent from my GT-P1000
Ok so ive looked at some threads containing info but I see no post telling me how to do this magic. Could one of you nice, young, kindhearted souls link me to where I need to go to put this thing on my verizon cdma galaxy tab? Please and thank you sirs?
Sent from my SCH-I800 using XDA App
Quadrant scores aren't as accurate as people think you know...
Sent from zombie infested Gingerbread.
There's an app called OCLF that will transparently add an EXT4 area on the RFS filesystem without needing to convert the whole thing to EXT4, giving you EXT4 IO performance in an easily installable and reversible way. Probably your best choice for trying it out. Otherwise, for the complete conversion, you could try this Modaco ROM/Kernel, which includes a complete conversion to EXT4.
As far as performance differences go, it makes a huge (10x) difference to the Quadrant IO score (measured before and after figures), but no measurable difference to actual performance (measured real-world usage figures). Some people claim to notice a subjective difference, but I never did.
Im using the modaco rom and kernel with ext4.
And it does make a huge difference. I get around 1800 in quadrant now.
conan1600 said:
Ok so ive looked at some threads containing info but I see no post telling me how to do this magic. Could one of you nice, young, kindhearted souls link me to where I need to go to put this thing on my verizon cdma galaxy tab? Please and thank you sirs?
Sent from my SCH-I800 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hi,
please be aware that the modaco kernel (rfs/ext4) will not work on CDMA Tabs.
from modaco kernel thread
This kernel is ONLY tested on a UK Galaxy Tab. It MAY work on other GSM Tabs, it almost certainly WON'T work on a CDMA Tab. If you have a non UK Tab and want to test (and know how to flash back to a regular version), then go ahead and report your results. At your own risk.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
regards,
mike
robertsydbrink said:
Im using the modaco rom and kernel with ext4.
And it does make a huge difference. I get around 1800 in quadrant now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's the point!
It makes a huge difference in Quadrant, which is a synthetic benchmark, but far, far less difference in real world usage - hence it is a crap benchmark!
Pre-EXT4 my Tab would pull around 1000 in Quadrant, whereas my Desire HD would pull around 1800. However in real usage, they seem to perform pretty much the same which is not too surprising as they are similarly specified. On EXT4, my Tab pulls around 1800 now, but still performs much like my DHD.
I so wish people would stop bandying about Quadrant scores because they are meaningless.
Regards,
Dave
If you look at the scores in quadrant , they are split by colour so you can see how good the graphics capabilities are for example and compare to other phones. The colour codes are at the bottom of quadrant by the way
Linpack is a better benchmark. Not perfect, but better
Not really - Linpack only tests floating point performance.
Regards,
Dave
Wow, I started a heated discussion lol. Well ive downloaded the one click lag fix but have not applied the ext2 tools as yet. Want to do more reading about it first. Obviously I want my yab to be the best it can be but I surely dont want to make it genericly better at the expence of my video grafix as one user said he suffered in that thread.
More reserch required
Sent from my SCH-I800 using XDA App
Taking Quadrant scores aside, when I made the switch from CF-Root to the Ext4 MCK, I really did notice a huge improvement in real world usage. I'm not sure if it is really because of the change in file system, but nevertheless thats the only big thing present in that kernel aside from CWM.
Everything said make sense and seems to be valid but let me share my experience.
I have Samsung Galaxy Vibrant and T-mobile Tab. Now both are using EXT4 file system and have fully functional recovery allowing for flashing straight from the phone.
Both now have Quanrant score around 1700-1800 and run very smothly.
Is I/O speed important? I think it is very important because task switching requires reading of huge chuncks of memory. Until read operation completed the user is essencially suspended. Multitasking is the major distinction of Android and lags associated with the tasks switching might be the most noticeable issue since its used so much. Converting of the RFS file system to EXT4 practically reduced lags to unnoticeable level. I don't need any better.
Another critical area for I/O is playing video and especially capturing HD video. The latter works only if I set internal storage and shut down all tasks.
This is work in progress but it seems it reached level of usability when most critical bugs eliminated.
It should be noted that the Tab is flashed with Rotohammer KM2 v1 ROM and Paul Obrien's kernel on a top. The kernel contains scripts converting the file system and flashing recovery. This combination works well, no issues so far.
Well I decided to give it a try and after install my quadrant is 2556 and linpack is 16.865 mflops at 1200mhz. Good scores but just numbers. I do however believe im seeing a bit of snap that I didnt have before when accessing my library. Still really unsure if this is a good thing as im not sure if I can use apps to sd anymore so I may uninstall at some point in the future but thanks to all you who helped the old man out. Atm im quite happy
Now lets get ta craka lackin on a 1.5 ghz update for our tabs
Sent from my SCH-I800 using XDA App
Of course you can use a2sd. Froyo does it by default
Sent from my Legend using XDA App
I think you are pushing!
Overclocking will raise processor/RAM heat dissipation and thus might lead to a catastrophic failure. It would be great to have temperature sensor on the board or at least measure current consumption from the battery but it is not easy.
Of course im a pushin lol. Only way to achieve is to try. Course ive read about the tab proccessor being able to handle 1.4 stable and can handle 1.6... Not that id know about these things first hand. Just taking the words of better men.
Just an old man with a little time to kill and a dream to be able to play facebook cityville on my tab haha. Well that and I have always enjoyed souping up my toys lmao.
Sent from my SCH-I800 using XDA App

I'll be that noob...

Trying to locate bc's 1.8 oc kernel with no luck. Can someone point me in the right direction please?
Sent from my Evo Shift.
Apologies if this is posted in the wrong area...
Sent from my Evo Shift.
http://www.thebcblends.com/shift/
There's a few different kernels in there. Look at the file names. GB is for Gingerbread roms, AOSP for AOSP roms, Sense... well that's obvious.
Don't feel bad, I don't believe it was ever posted.
Sent from my HTC Speedy
Edit: fixed the link.
Thanks. Felt totally retarded not being able to find it.
Sent from my Evo Shift.
Now for a second question. When flashing this kernel, is it necessary to flash the 1.5 kernel before hand? I think I read somewhere that it is suggested but don't remember any confirmation on this matter. Also, any suggestions for roms?
Sent from my Evo Shift.
bobtsunam said:
Now for a second question. When flashing this kernel, is it necessary to flash the 1.5 kernel before hand? I think I read somewhere that it is suggested but don't remember any confirmation on this matter. Also, any suggestions for roms?
Sent from my Evo Shift.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know the answer to that but..
Also when flashing a new kernel don't forget to clear your delvik cache.
bobtsunam said:
Now for a second question. When flashing this kernel, is it necessary to flash the 1.5 kernel before hand? I think I read somewhere that it is suggested but don't remember any confirmation on this matter. Also, any suggestions for roms?
Sent from my Evo Shift.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Someone had posted that just flashing the 1.8 kept giving them a boot loop and when they flashed 1.5 to 1.8 it worked fine
Edit: Pg11 on the kernel topic posted is where they discuss this
Sent from my PG06100 using XDA App
kbrn said:
I don't know the answer to that but..
Also when flashing a new kernel don't forget to clear your delvik cache.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Would not clearing delvik cache cause random reboot? I don't remember doing it so I'm guessing I didn't. I have the 1.5 kernel flashed now and when I had it maxed out it rebooted once while I was trying to post earlier through the xda app. I have it set to 1.4 now and haven't had a problem. Could this be the max my processor can handle? Should I even give the 1.8 kernel a chance given the reboot issue? Thanks to everyone who is helping.
Sent from my Evo Shift.
You could wipe dalvik and flash the 1.8..I personally wouldn't set my max to 1.8 just cause I had problems overheating and a few reboots but you could try something in the 1.5-1.7 range and see how that goes...then again I over heated trying to get higher linpacks and ended up just over 65
Sent from my PG06100 using XDA App
I will give it a try and see what happens. At least I have nandroid to fall back on if all else fails. How about ROMs? Does anyone have any suggestions? I came from a Moto Cliq and was using ADLX's ROM (I think 2.1) and loved what he did for the phone. Definitely like using Launcher Pro but am growing partial to Sense. Opinions and suggestion openly welcomed. Will prolly try a few before I settle. I am definitley anxious to try Gingerbread but have heard that it may be skipped over for alot of phones in favor of Honeycomb?...
JKILO said:
You could wipe dalvik and flash the 1.8..I personally wouldn't set my max to 1.8 just cause I had problems overheating and a few reboots but you could try something in the 1.5-1.7 range and see how that goes...then again I over heated trying to get higher linpacks and ended up just over 65
Sent from my PG06100 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dont't feel bad, I'm sure there'll be quite a few more users that can't make it that high.
@OP - I helped somebody in the IRC who got bootloops even when wiping cache and dalvik cache. Ultimately the only thing the worked for him was to flash the 1.5 then the 1.8. Every user will, sadly, have a slightly different experience.
Sent from my HTC Speedy
Will be giving it a go after I get home. Work is such a burden when you have more fascinating things to do....
Sent from my Evo Shift.
I have flashed the 1.8 oc kernel and seems to be stable at the moment. Scored a 2217 on Quadrant. Only minimal improvement from the 1.5 kernel. Scored a 2063 with that one. Also haven't maxed out the new kernel. Running just under max. Will do some stress testing and see what happens.
Sent from my Evo Shift.
bobtsunam said:
I have flashed the 1.8 oc kernel and seems to be stable at the moment. Scored a 2217 on Quadrant. Only minimal improvement from the 1.5 kernel. Scored a 2063 with that one. Also haven't maxed out the new kernel. Running just under max. Will do some stress testing and see what happens.
Sent from my Evo Shift.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's actually a pretty reasonable improvement. A few people in the IRC have broken 3000, including myself, on Evervolv. However, I had virtually NOTHING on the phone when I got that.
Its a shame benchmarks don't accurately reflect phone performance, cause this phone is amazing even on the stock rom @ 800 mhz.
Sent from my Speedy Shift.

Best Before Date

my Atrix was flying before i had to send it in for warranty work a few weeks back. (digitizer) Antutu scores around 7000. the rest of the benchmark tests where pretty high also. When it was returned i immediately unlocked the bootloader and rooted it. Now my scores from Antutu are 4500 at best. I am using the exact same rom (Neutrino), and kernel (Faux123) as before. I have tried other roms (cm7 nightlies) reinstalled and full fastboot wipe many times but still the same outcome. The only difference i can see is that i used an different method to unlock the bootloader and root the second time around. Do you think the some of the permission where affected differently the second time around. Am i just overlooking something?
HELP!!!!!!
thks
Is the phone actually slower? Or just scoring lower scores?
Sent from my HTC Inspire 4G using XDA
Benchmarks mean nothing
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Alcapone263 said:
Benchmarks mean nothing
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That was going to be my next statement.
Sent from my HTC Inspire 4G using XDA
the phone actually feels slower. more laggy when it comes to videos, games, scrolling through menus. my fps scores are all lower across the board in any benckmark. yes i know they mean nothing but when the scores are that drastically effected there is an issue i believe.
gentledroid17 said:
the phone actually feels slower. more laggy when it comes to videos, games, scrolling through menus. my fps scores are all lower across the board in any benckmark. yes i know they mean nothing but when the scores are that drastically effected there is an issue i believe.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have heard that refurbished phones USUALLY don't perform as well as the brand new ones do. Here is my example, a refurbished Atrix I read from some users can't even sometimes boot a custom kernel when the custom kernel is around 1.45 to 1.6. For example the one kernel that the dev clemsyn. I saw a FEW mention that when they said they had a refurbished Atrix.
Sent from my Atrix with XDA Premium
gentledroid17 said:
my Atrix was flying before i had to send it in for warranty work a few weeks back. (digitizer) Antutu scores around 7000. the rest of the benchmark tests where pretty high also. When it was returned i immediately unlocked the bootloader and rooted it. Now my scores from Antutu are 4500 at best. I am using the exact same rom (Neutrino), and kernel (Faux123) as before. I have tried other roms (cm7 nightlies) reinstalled and full fastboot wipe many times but still the same outcome. The only difference i can see is that i used an different method to unlock the bootloader and root the second time around. Do you think the some of the permission where affected differently the second time around. Am i just overlooking something?
HELP!!!!!!
thks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is a "Boost.sh" script included with Neutrino (I believe in /system/etc) that Notorious recommends be run when you get that "not so fresh" feeling. It is a defrag tool that can be assigned to a widget and should be run every so often.
Also, you will want to see if "Nitrocharger.sh" in the same directory is running as Root at Boot. I have seen big improvements by implementing this.
Both of these scripts came with the ROM, so hopefully you have fast access to them. Good luck to you!
thanks for the info fellow xdaers,,,,,
Voelker45 said:
I have heard that refurbished phones USUALLY don't perform as well as the brand new ones do. Here is my example, a refurbished Atrix I read from some users can't even sometimes boot a custom kernel when the custom kernel is around 1.45 to 1.6. For example the one kernel that the dev clemsyn. I saw a FEW mention that when they said they had a refurbished Atrix.
Sent from my Atrix with XDA Premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually I had the opposite experience. My original phone wouldn't boot with the clemsyn kernel. My digitizer bombed and I received a refurbished unit from repairs. The new unit runs the clemsyn kernel just fine. So I guess it's just the luck of the draw...
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
tobnddl said:
There is a "Boost.sh" script included with Neutrino (I believe in /system/etc) that Notorious recommends be run when you get that "not so fresh" feeling. It is a defrag tool that can be assigned to a widget and should be run every so often.
Also, you will want to see if "Nitrocharger.sh" in the same directory is running as Root at Boot. I have seen big improvements by implementing this.
Both of these scripts came with the ROM, so hopefully you have fast access to them. Good luck to you!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
gentledroid17 said:
the phone actually feels slower. more laggy when it comes to videos, games, scrolling through menus. my fps scores are all lower across the board in any benckmark. yes i know they mean nothing but when the scores are that drastically effected there is an issue i believe.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As tob said, those "so verry little script" can makes big differences sometimes
I would like to add my personal toughts, for me, the ROM actually scoring higher and higher and feel a litle bit more freshier each week past within the ROM... so my thoughts would be, the cache partition, the more longer the rom is implemented, the more score you'll get cause the cache slowly become bigger and bigger giving you full power to open something tough!
As for the battery, from my experiences, you can't really judge a battery life while you just flashed a rom, you got to wait until the first week to see if there a big changes between the other ROM you came from ... so my guess would be, those scripts and the longer the ROM is implemented on your phone, the more fast and stable it will get, and you will feel the power slowly coming out again!
My bad if I'm completely wrong, but it is my guess!
Hood luck with your "new" phone
i brought up some old Antutu scores and notice that my ram. cpu integar and floating point scores are extremely low. i have tried multiple kernels but still no change. now i am even more confused......doesn't take much. could it be that my cpu is locked so i can not overclock. it kinda feels like its only utilizing one core.
after weeks of exhaustive searching i finally found a fix that worked.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1131649
pdsfix.zip
now my antutu scores are back up to around 7000. less lag in app drawer and opening /closing certain app. its back to silky smooth yeehaw.

Categories

Resources