Recently there's has been a release of Cyanogen Mod version 7 for GT-I9000
http://forum.cyanogenmod.com/topic/15275-gt-i9000-cyanogenmod-7-we-love-bugs-version-20110205/
When the 6.1 beta came out for this device I remember Eugene fixed up a sweet kernel for us that fixed various issues, such as button mapping and kernel panics, which allowed us to have CM on T959 devices
Just letting everyone know it's out, and that if any nice devs would like to build a kernel to fix some issues we can have this on our devices!!!
I AM NOT ASKING FOR AN ETA OF ANY KIND. I'M SIMPLY ASKING IF THERE IS A DEV OUT THERE THAT WOULD LOOK INTO THE RECENTLY RELEASED CM7 AND SEE IF THERE'S ANY PROBLEMS WITH IT THAT CAN EASILY BE FIXED, LIKE KEY MAPPING.
Maybe someone should try the latest GT-I9000 CM7 beta with the last kernel that eugene released for CM on T959? I would try, but I don't want to reconfigure my perfect setup right now
P.S. if anyone uses CM on Vibrant, remember to use sombionix's SD mount fix so that your internal SD mounts properly!
PSP_Hacker said:
Maybe someone should try the latest GT-I9000 CM7 beta with the last kernel that eugene released for CM on T959? I would try, but I don't want to reconfigure my perfect setup right now
P.S. if anyone uses CM on Vibrant, remember to use sombionix's SD mount fix so that your internal SD mounts properly!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same I think I'll wait for a new nightly to pop up or Eugene to work his magic and create another fix, it shouldn't be that hard... just reconfigure the old fix to work with the new code?
I forgot to mention that Team Whiskey is working on an AOSP build for the Vibrant! I read it first in the OP for Bionix-v thread when it was first created:
also, as soon as we get our hands on the source code, we'll begin a full aosp build compiled from source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And right now the OP has been updated with this:
Coming Soon:
Multiple high quality themes will soon be available for Bionix-v. Team whiskey has also been working hard to bring you a stable 2.2.1 and 2.3 rom. Expect a stable 2.2.1 to drop soon...very soon. Other very exciting goodies coming in the near future. Don't worry, we haven't forgotten about you!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I really like that "...very soon." part.
PSP_Hacker said:
Maybe someone should try the latest GT-I9000 CM7 beta with the last kernel that eugene released for CM on T959? I would try, but I don't want to reconfigure my perfect setup right now
P.S. if anyone uses CM on Vibrant, remember to use sombionix's SD mount fix so that your internal SD mounts properly!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The problem with that idea is that Eugene's new kernel is a FroYo kernel, not Gingerbread (which is what CM7 is). I'm sure Eugene or TW could get a good Gingerbread build working though.
MorphiusFaydal said:
The problem with that idea is that Eugene's new kernel is a FroYo kernel, not Gingerbread (which is what CM7 is). I'm sure Eugene or TW could get a good Gingerbread build working though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So? Eugene can get access to 2.3 source just as CMod and TW have...
bobbbb said:
So? Eugene can get access to 2.3 source just as CMod and TW have...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Jeez, stop demanding this and that. These are the kind of posts that developers HATE to see.
Samsung hasn't released froyo source much less gingerbread. Pretty sure krylon360 and others are using nexus s/sdk and maybe even writing drivers themselves to get ginger working.
anthonys2r said:
Jeez, stop demanding this and that. These are the kind of posts that developers HATE to see.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not demanding anything kid, I was just stating initially that CM7 came out, just in case some devs hadn't noticed. And i was replying to someone who said Eugene couldn't do anything because he only works with 2.2 source? Something ridiculous like that...
I ran CM7 a couple days ago... only thing it really needed was the Vibrant modem.
new kernel isn't going to do much.
scrizz said:
I ran CM7 a couple days ago... only thing it really needed was the Vibrant modem.
new kernel isn't going to do much.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
WUT??????????!!!!!
How does it work?!?!?!? What's broken so far? What's working?
scrizz said:
I ran CM7 a couple days ago... only thing it really needed was the Vibrant modem.
new kernel isn't going to do much.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did u just flash the i9k rom or what?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
bbm21 said:
Did u just flash the i9k rom or what?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
flash the one from the i9000 and
just extract the modem.bin from the Vibrant modem you choose
next
place it in your sdcard.
then after you have CM7 installed.
open terminal emulator and type this:
Code:
su
dd if=/sdcard/modem.bin of=/dev/block/mtdblock5
number one rule for CyanogenMod: don't ask for ETA's.
smackdown85146 said:
number one rule for CyanogenMod: don't ask for ETA's.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think that applies since Cyanogen just started that none of the CMSGS work is "official"... Therefore, asking for ETAs aren't against the rules, just annoying
smackdown85146 said:
number one rule for CyanogenMod: don't ask for ETA's.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No one is asking for ETA, i just asked if there is a dev out there willing to help with the probable key mapping problem that would occur if us vibrant users were to flash this rom...
bobbbb said:
I'm not demanding anything kid, I was just stating initially that CM7 came out, just in case some devs hadn't noticed. And i was replying to someone who said Eugene couldn't do anything because he only works with 2.2 source? Something ridiculous like that...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think if you read a little closer, I was commenting that the 2.2 source that was leaked to Eugene is about as useful to CM7/GingerBread ROM development as the 2.1 source was to 2.2 ROMs.
I can get data on JL5
Demiurgic said:
I can get data on JL5
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All the buttons are reversed though, correct?
no not switched only my list and back buttons work. This really should be labeled a tech demo. Of course it's full of dragons, just go read the known bugs over at the cyanogen forums. It works - fun to play with cyanogen7 but thats it - don't expect this to be a fully working daily driver.
Related
I was wondering why its been so quite after HTC released the new kernel for the Sprint Hero, I thought that was the missing link that was needed for complete 1.6/2.0/2.1 roms?
It hasn't been quiet.
Also the kernel that HTC released needs to be ported to 2.6.29 to fully work with 1.6+.
All this info is on the forum & easily obtainable.
gu1dry said:
It hasn't been quiet.
Also the kernel that HTC released needs to be ported to 2.6.29 to fully work with 1.6+.
All this info is on the forum & easily obtainable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just thought we would see some 1.6/2.0/2.1 releases now that the kernel was released, that's all
There's been 1.6+ releases for a while...
Let me elaborate a little here:
This kernel that was released is not a magic bullet, it allows us to see what code needs to be changed to get the correct Kernel to run these newer versions. It also lets us make any performance changes we can find.
All of the changes need to be put into the current kernel source,making it a .29 or whatever we need.
It has been fairly quite, we aren't seeing tons of Roms being thrown out to the market, thankfully. Our devs are taking all the time they need to make sure everything works and is stable. We should see some big stuff happen in the next week or so.
gu1dry said:
There's been 1.6+ releases for a while...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea but not completely working, which I thought the new kernel would fix?
kyrumo71 said:
Yea but not completely working, which I thought the new kernel would fix?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
gu1dry said:
the kernel that HTC released needs to be ported to 2.6.29
All this info is on the forum & easily obtainable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
/thread....
Kcarpenter said:
Let me elaborate a little here:
This kernel that was released is not a magic bullet, it allows us to see what code needs to be changed to get the correct Kernel to run these newer versions. It also lets us make any performance changes we can find.
All of the changes need to be put into the current kernel source,making it a .29 or whatever we need.
It has been fairly quite, we aren't seeing tons of Roms being thrown out to the market, thankfully. Our devs are taking all the time they need to make sure everything works and is stable. We should see some big stuff happen in the next week or so.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good to know, I guess I'm like a kid in the candy store, thanks for educating me on the kernel process.
Modaco's 2.2 has the customized kernel in it now.. read the front page of the Hero forum for the link..
its very nice..
tyrnight said:
Modaco's 2.2 has the customized kernel in it now.. read the front page of the Hero forum for the link..
its very nice..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea that's what I'm rocking right now, I'm just impatient for a fully funcional newer OS
Froyo just hit AOSP
http://twitter.com/cyanogen
Can anyone else confirm? I have no idea where to check.
Cyanogen is a MANS man
And this is coming from a guy who doesn't even root yet...
Andy Rubin just said this at the Moto Droid X event.
Edit: So yeah, it's confirmed. Which means what, we get a Froyo version of CM tonight?
Yay.
Froyo here we come!
Awesome. Cant wait for the CM ROM
Cy says hes going off for the rest of the week though
oh hell yea!!!
as for cm flavoured froyo i rekon its gonna be a couple of weeks!
Was just about to flash to a new rom. Just finished downloading two but looks like I will wait.
cyanogen said:
It figures they would drop it right before I leave for the rest of the week.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Boo, lol, that sucks.
I love stock FroYo. Wonder what crazy stuff Cyanogen will come up with?
Woooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!
... and there's still no custom ROM based on the AOSP?
xPatriicK said:
... and there's still no custom ROM based on the AOSP?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
STILL???????
We don't even have an official FroYo ROM yet. Give CM a bit of slack.
xPatriicK said:
... and there's still no custom ROM based on the AOSP?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're joking right?
It JUST got pushed to AOSP.
these are very exciting times! not just for the CM team, but the community; unfinished/stuck projects especially.
Does this mean we might see an OTA soon?
-------------------------------------
Sent via the XDA Tapatalk App
What does this mean
I am a noob at software development. But I saw the word "OTA Timestamp" , "froyo" at the AOSP source page ( link below)
http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=pl...it;h=3b85269cfe10ec15e9b544dd6964b8c9f5f761f9
Can somebody explain what this means ?
I'm most interested to see if we can get a few more FPS out of 720p recording with a move to Froyo.
Am I the only one that wants an Android.com email address ???!?
dharani1234 said:
I am a noob at software development. But I saw the word "OTA Timestamp" , "froyo" at the AOSP source page ( link below)
http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=pl...it;h=3b85269cfe10ec15e9b544dd6964b8c9f5f761f9
Can somebody explain what this means ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Inclusion of the time/date the OTA is sent out in the metadata of the file.
http://developer.htc.com/
Released today ! Hooray!
rr5678 said:
This IS DEVELOPMENT!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Umm, its negligible. To start a thread in development you need to have created something for other people to test and use. Posting a link to a website which developers probably check every day doesn't really count.
cjward23 said:
Umm, its negligible. To start a thread in development you need to have created something for other people to test and use. Posting a link to a website which developers probably check every day doesn't really count.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am in agreement here; this should not be in dev as it is just a link to the kernel released, no actual development is being done. It belongs in general. Plus, you guys need to stop bickering damnit! Time to start this thread with a clean slate.
So can an overclock kernel be developed from this and will it be?
mike102871 said:
So can an overclock kernel be developed from this and will it be?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We all ready have kernels based on this source. Have had for a while, it just released on a different website
"rmk40: People keep mentioning the kernel source on htcdev.com. They didn't release anything new that wasn't already on developer.htc.com."
--http://twitter.com/rmk40/status/101152290647449601
Do Androids dream of electric sheep?
cjward23 said:
We all ready have kernels based on this source. Have had for a while, it just released on a different website
"rmk40: People keep mentioning the kernel source on htcdev.com. They didn't release anything new that wasn't already on developer.htc.com."
--http://twitter.com/rmk40/status/101152290647449601
Do Androids dream of electric sheep?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok. Well this is the kernel used on the ota gb on my g2. Can you please point me to the kernel that will oc my ota gb g2 and not break anything. Like wifi etc. Please....
mike102871 said:
Ok. Well this is the kernel used on the ota gb on my g2. Can you please point me to the kernel that will oc my ota gb g2 and not break anything. Like wifi etc. Please....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I assume that you are rooted. I'm not sure what kernels are currently working on gb ota. I've been using sense for a few months so I'm not up-to-date with what is working on stock rooted roms.
This one might work http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1180071
Do Androids dream of electric sheep?
I'm preparing to be flamed, but I figured I might as well create this thread. Now I know many of you know this, along with the i896 source, is out, but there wasn't a thread for it and the i896 one had issues, so here . Hopefully we can get some development going for those of us that want *shutters* Audience Chip drivers, along with the many features that are present in the i9000 roms.
Just search KK4 on here: https://opensource.samsung.com/index.jsp
nygfan760 said:
I'm preparing to be flamed, but I figured I might as well create this thread. Now I know many of you know this, along with the i896 source, is out, but there wasn't a thread for it and the i896 one had issues, so here . Hopefully we can get some development going for those of us that want *shutters* Audience Chip drivers, along with the many features that are present in the i9000 roms.
Just search KK4 on here: https://opensource.samsung.com/index.jsp
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Doesn't bother me anymore since now ICS is doing great.
But, if really want to stick with GB(usually MIUI and CyanogenMOD).
I would like:
a.) The Audience Chip thingy.
b.) Battery life.
Fate-Silver said:
Doesn't bother me anymore since now ICS is doing great.
But, if really want to stick with GB(usually MIUI and CyanogenMOD).
I would like:
a.) The Audience Chip thingy.
b.) Battery life.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What? I'm not making anything. I was informing the community (those who didn't know) of the source code.
nygfan760 said:
What? I'm not making anything. I was informing the community (those who didn't know) of the source code.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea, I know.
I just want to tell AT&T/Samsung is SLOW for their firmware codes sharing... too stingy...
Fate-Silver said:
Doesn't bother me anymore since now ICS is doing great.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yea I been onICS for 24 hours now ,, its great , but nothing special I see very few differences in anything , except I am missing all of the features I m use to on GB .
imo dotn believe the hype , the only 2 things I like about my current ICS set up is sixstring kernel allows me to OC higher then on sammy rom (not higher then cm7 tho) and the launcher is pretty cool but still not as nice as on the gnex .
Eventho its 2.3.5 I welcome source of KK4
eventho Im 2.3.6 (i9000 base )
I'm looking forward to the more refined kernels the source code release should bring around. Those features we've been missing will now be possible.
nygfan760 said:
I'm preparing to be flamed, but I figured I might as well create this thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why? There is already a thread created in General. This is where searching comes in handy.
Red5 said:
Why? There is already a thread created in General. This is where searching comes in handy.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Saw the thread. It is a discussion thread about the firmware, this thread is to alert people of the actual source code, so we can get new kernels and stuffs Also, aren't most source code threads posted in here? At least for Froyo, and i896 GB, I believe they were.
Audience chip support was already extracted from the I896 gingerbread source kernel. It is available in the i9000 captivate corn kernel. Specifically gave me thanks for being able to introduce audience tip finally.
If you would like Audience support in any other kernels just contact the developer of corn.. A few months ago
TRusselo said:
Audience chip support was already extracted from the I896 gingerbread source kernel. It is available in the i9000 captivate corn kernel. Specifically gave me thanks for being able to introduce audience tip finally.
If you would like Audience support in any other kernels just contact the developer of corn.. A few months ago
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know, I know, I have been running it for a while now.
but im surprised that kk4 was final release. had time-stamp issue.
but now if we can get a unbranded kernel, we can have a complete unbranded rom with the ATT removal mods i posted while back.
TRusselo said:
but im surprised that kk4 was final release. had time-stamp issue.
but now if we can get a unbranded kernel, we can have a complete unbranded rom with the ATT removal mods i posted while back.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm pretty sure that problem only happens when you put AT&T software on an i896. I can't say for sure though because both my cappy's are canadian. Anyways I don't think ts a problem with the phone per se.. I think its a network thing. There is no time stamp issue for people on the AT&T network that I know of.
KK4 Source has been available since around Christmas. Some of the I897 kernel devs have been trying to compile a kernel from source but have been running into issues with the kernel not booting which is why you haven't seen any yet.
erbsmokah said:
I'm pretty sure that problem only happens when you put AT&T software on an i896. I can't say for sure though because both my cappy's are canadian. Anyways I don't think ts a problem with the phone per se.. I think its a network thing. There is no time stamp issue for people on the AT&T network that I know of.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its a network AND software issue. Either they can fix the problem though the network, (its been done before) or you can de-compile the MMS.apk and change a line of code to fix the problem.
Kyuta Syuko said:
KK4 Source has been available since around Christmas. Some of the I897 kernel devs have been trying to compile a kernel from source but have been running into issues with the kernel not booting which is why you haven't seen any yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that was the kh2 rogers i896 source that they were having trouble with.... or are they having trouble with kk4 also???
TRusselo said:
Its a network AND software issue. Either they can fix the problem though the network, (its been done before) or you can de-compile the MMS.apk and change a line of code to fix the problem.
that was the kh2 rogers i896 source that they were having trouble with.... or are they having trouble with kk4 also???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He is a kernel dev but yeah I hope that isn't the problem.
TRusselo said:
that was the kh2 rogers i896 source that they were having trouble with.... or are they having trouble with kk4 also???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Both JSmokey and I haven't been able to get a kernel compiled from the KK4 source that we had gotten around Christmas. Though JSmokey said he did have a working kernel before, but isn't certain what he did to make it not work anymore. I've even tried to compile a stock kernel per the included instructions with no luck...
Kyuta Syuko said:
Both JSmokey and I haven't been able to get a kernel compiled from the KK4 source that we had gotten around Christmas. Though JSmokey said he did have a working kernel before, but isn't certain what he did to make it not work anymore. I've even tried to compile a stock kernel per the included instructions with no luck...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same here, there must be something missing. Pulling a dmsg doesn't give much help, something about wanting sh in /system/bin (I think).
I have moved over to cyanogenmod 7 for now, waiting for cm9. Lots to tinker with there.
boog said:
Same here, there must be something missing. Pulling a dmsg doesn't give much help, something about wanting sh in /system/bin (I think).
I have moved over to cyanogenmod 7 for now, waiting for cm9. Lots to tinker with there.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
.... no our original 2.3 kernel dev has given up
Sounds like the only way to get bln is to go to 2.2 or i9000.
Wdustin1 said:
.... no our original 2.3 kernel dev has given up
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe we can ask DG for help. I know he has moved on a long time ago, but recently he came back and helped with ICS kernel development. If he could help us getting KK4 kernel compiled from source, I am sure we will see a lot more ROM development going on.
Hi all I will be working this a little. But don't expect anything to great. I don't have a whole lot of time to work on this. I bricked my phone and not having much luck getting it replaced. So I won't be working on this to much until I can get a new phone as I will be spending all my time working.
Most stuff posted here is probably gonna be untested.
I will be posting cm7, cm9, and cm10 builds here.
Idk if any of these work.
Don't get mad at me if they brick your device. Infact treat them with a high chance of brickage, unless otherwise noted.
CyanogenMod 7:
Code:
[CENTER]
[B][U][COLOR="Blue"][SIZE="2"]Download:[/SIZE][/COLOR][/U][/B]
[URL="https://www.dropbox.com/s/1ct15i6fxbprpjj/cm-7-20120720-UNOFFICIAL-captivatemtd.zip"]cm-7-20120720-UNOFFICIAL-captivatemtd.zip[/URL]
[B][U][SIZE="2"][COLOR="Blue"]Google Apps for Gingerbread:[/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/B]
[URL="http://goo.im/gapps/gapps-gb-20110828-signed.zip"]gapps-gb-20110828-signed.zip[/URL][/CENTER]
CyanogenMod 9:
Code:
[CENTER][B][U][COLOR="Blue"][SIZE="2"]Downloads:[/SIZE][/COLOR][/U][/B]
[URL="https://www.dropbox.com/s/p0n6myyedm7pyx4/cm-9-20120720-UNOFFICIAL-captivatemtd.zip"]cm-9-20120720-UNOFFICIAL-captivatemtd.zip[/URL]
[B][U][SIZE="2"][COLOR="Blue"]Google Apps for ICS:[/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/B]
[URL="http://goo.im/gapps/gapps-ics-20120429-signed.zip"]gapps-ics-20120429-signed.zip[/URL][/CENTER]
CyanogenMod 10:
Code:
[CENTER][B][U][COLOR="Blue"][SIZE="2"]Download:[/SIZE][/COLOR][/U][/B]
[URL="http://www.mediafire.com/?ndt440n4ux0ctaz"]cm-10-20120727-UNOFFICIAL-captivatemtd.zip[/URL]
[B][U][COLOR="Blue"][SIZE="2"]Old builds:[/SIZE][/COLOR][/U][/B]
[URL="http://www.mediafire.com/?2n75vev3qvcl417"]cm-10-20120723-UNOFFICIAL-captivatemtd.zip[/URL]
[URL="http://www.mediafire.com/?d89z35acc2cpaxr"]cm-10-FIXED_RECOVERY-captivatemtd.zip[/URL]
[SIZE="2"][B][U][COLOR="Blue"]Google Apps for JellyBean:[/COLOR][/U][/B][/SIZE]
[URL="http://goo.im/gapps/gapps-jb-20120726-signed.zip"]gapps-jb-20120726-signed.zip[/URL]
[URL="http://www.mediafire.com/?xje9p4hl1qv56qz"]inverted_gapps2-jb-20120715.zip[/URL]
[/CENTER]
Recovery:
Code:
[CENTER][B][U][SIZE="2"][COLOR="Blue"]Fake Flashes:[/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/B]
Touch recovery 6 Fake flash: [URL="http://www.mediafire.com/?k240g28o332apgy"]touch_recovery_fake_flash.zip[/URL]
This is a preview most ways to navigate doesn't work. Normal recovery functions work though
Thanks to:
[URL="http://forum.xda-developers.com/member.php?u=2492461"]sk8erwitskil[/URL] for the source
[/CENTER]
Install instructions:
Code:
[CENTER]Make a backup......
Factory reset........
Mounts and storage > format system.......
Advanced > Wipe Dalvik Cache.......
Install Rom......
Install gapps.....
Reboot......
Go to Rom Manager and fix permissions......
Reboot......
Your all set.........[/CENTER]
Upgrading From a Previous Version:
Code:
[CENTER]Reboot to Recovery
Go to mounts and storage and format system...
Flash latest rom....
If coming from a different build like from cm9 to cm10
then follow the install instructions
When going from cm10 to cm10 flash latest cm10 zip
When going from cm9 to cm9 flash latest cm9 zip[/CENTER]
AOKP- JellyBean test build
Code:
[CENTER][SIZE="3"][B][U]Download:[/U][/B][/SIZE] [URL="http://www.mediafire.com/?9eud3x8c4pq4atd"]
AOKP-JB-captivate-b1.zip[/URL]
[SIZE="3"][B][U]Doesn't work:[/U][/B][/SIZE]
Rom Control force closes Settings
Messaging force closes
Still being tested. Please provide feedback[/CENTER]
cm7 builds:
cm-7-20120720-UNOFFICIAL-captivatemtd.zip
gapps-gb-20110828-signed.zip
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what's different from Official version this unofficial version?
p.s: sorry for my english
Someone please confirm but I thought releases weren't supposed to be put on xda without the op having a device to test it on? Just curious...
Sent from my SGH-I897 using xda premium
I have this device. I bricked my skyrocket
Sent from my SGH-I897 using Tapatalk 2
levanr said:
what's different from Official version this unofficial version?
p.s: sorry for my english
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not sure. I just like making my own builds and I figured I'd post them.
Sent from my SGH-I897 using Tapatalk 2
levanr said:
what's different from Official version this unofficial version?
p.s: sorry for my english
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
"unofficial" is beta version that has some problem, "official" is perfect version that has no problem.
gmillz said:
Hi all I will be working this a little. But don't expect anything to great. I don't have a whole lot of time to work on this. I bricked my phone and not having much luck getting it replaced. So I won't be working on this to much until I can get a new phone as I will be spending all my time working.
Most stuff posted here is probably gonna be untested.
I will be posting cm7, cm9, and cm10 builds here.
Idk if any of these work.
Don't get mad at me if they brick your device. Infact treat them with a high chance of brickage, unless otherwise noted.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
-Downloading
If they wont work... you need a logcat or something .. am I right ?
How to install: ?
Features: ?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
Are these the same available on get.cm?
unnecessary (sorry)
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk 2
Gore785 said:
How to install: ?
Features: ?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if you dont understand how to install please leave the area lol
What's the point of this thread?
CheesyNutz said:
if you dont understand how to install please leave the area lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've honestly lost count of all your posts that offer absolutely nothing helpful or relevant to the discussion.
I understand theres not much of a point to this. The main reason for this thread is cm10 as all the other cm10 roms don't have the stock cm kernel. But since I build the other ones anyways i figured I'd post them. And I'll post install instructions.
kevinnol said:
-Downloading
If they wont work... you need a logcat or something .. am I right ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Definitely. Logcats would be great
CheesyNutz said:
if you dont understand how to install please leave the area lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Meant that as in anything we should do in specific before, during, or after install Like fix permissions?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
johnnyrichter said:
What's the point of this thread?
I've honestly lost count of all your posts that offer absolutely nothing helpful or relevant to the discussion.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
gmillz said:
I understand theres not much of a point to this. The main reason for this thread is cm10 as all the other cm10 roms don't have the stock cm kernel. But since I build the other ones anyways i figured I'd post them. And I'll post install instructions.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So...if you understand there's not much of a point, why post at all? Also, FYI, in regard to your OP: "to" is not the same as "too", and "infact" is not a word. Just sayin'.
adzidek said:
So...if you understand there's not much of a point, why post at all? Also, FYI, in regard to your OP: "to" is not the same as "too", and "infact" is not a word. Just sayin'.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because this is the only cm10 rom with the stock cm kernel. I meant there was not much reason to post any of the other builds
gmillz said:
Because this is the only cm10 rom with the stock cm kernel. I meant there was not much reason to post any of the other builds
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You'll likely receive a lot of flak over re-hosting/posting stuff as you've seen thus far, but if you're offering something you've re-worked in any way(which is what I understand you're doing) then I'd stick with just that and link to other threads in your OP if necessary.
If you compiled from CM10 source here we have CM10 kernel for Captivate (no datadata partition).
This is very interesting.
Thank you very much: if compiling went well this is really an important step for JB on Cappy and now we can run also official Pawitp builds.
Monfro said:
If you compiled from CM10 source here we have CM10 kernel for Captivate (no datadata partition).
This is very interesting.
Thank you very much: if compiling went well this is really an important step for JB on Cappy and now we can run also official Pawitp builds.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes this is compiled from source specifically for the captivate.
And compiles with no errors