Database Users

[COMPARISON] Speedmod or Super Optimized Kernel

2 kernels for galaxy s froyo has recently intrigued me, namely [KERNEL][OC-UV-TINYRCU-BFQ-RAMZSWAP] Super Optimized Kernel (4_2 STABLE) (2010-10-19) by laststufo, and [KERNEL] SpeedMod Froyo 341MB RAM [K7 Test] [I1.2 Stable] by hardcore.
This is the speedmod kernel
and this is the super optimized kernel
I know speedmod sets the minimum clock speed to 250/300/500 depending on which one you flash and includes some fixes from voodoo and also the ULK, while the super optimized kernel includes ramzswap which decreases ram usage virtually, while adding the same implementations such as voodoo fixes and ULK.
So which one is better in your opinion? Do state your reasons.
-PS: I didn't really understood the meaning of Hz but now i kinda do thanks to Bos$. The 250/300/500 is not minimum clockspeed.

None of which. I prefer YA-OK, which gives me the most snappy feeling with a slight OC/UV that does not degrade system stability or battery life.

fraencko said:
None of which. I prefer YA-OK, which gives me the most snappy feeling with a slight OC/UV that does not degrade system stability or battery life.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same here, YA-OK, smooth, fast and stable,

Poxit said:
Same here, YA-OK, smooth, fast and stable,
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same here, loving the Ya ok!!!
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App

artyte said:
I know speedmod sets the minimum clock speed to 250/300/500 depending on which one you flash and includes some fixes from voodoo and also the ULK, while the super optimized kernel includes ramzswap which decreases ram usage virtually, while adding the same implementations such as voodoo fixes and ULK.
So which one is better in your opinion? Do state your reasons.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AFAIK, SpeedMod doesn't set the minimum clock speed like what you said. Read the thread for more info.
I would go for SpeedMod, haven't tried the other one yet.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App

artyte said:
I know speedmod sets the minimum clock speed to 250/300/500 depending on which one you flash and includes some fixes from voodoo and also the ULK, while the super optimized kernel includes ramzswap which decreases ram usage virtually, while adding the same implementations such as voodoo fixes and ULK.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I thnik you should read more about linux HZ parameter In this case HZ doesn't mean Hertz.

Great topic!
Guys tell me... Which one is better for better battery life?
YA-OK, SpeedMod or Super Optimized? (and best lag fix for stable and fast) all tweaks on?

artyte said:
2 kernels for galaxy s froyo has recently intrigued me, namely [KERNEL][OC-UV-TINYRCU-BFQ-RAMZSWAP] Super Optimized Kernel (4_2 STABLE) (2010-10-19) by laststufo, and [KERNEL] SpeedMod Froyo 341MB RAM [K7 Test] [I1.2 Stable] by hardcore.
This is the speedmod kernel
and this is the super optimized kernel
I know speedmod sets the minimum clock speed to 250/300/500 depending on which one you flash and includes some fixes from voodoo and also the ULK, while the super optimized kernel includes ramzswap which decreases ram usage virtually, while adding the same implementations such as voodoo fixes and ULK.
So which one is better in your opinion? Do state your reasons.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i think you're getting the concept wrong about hardcore's hz lol

Raol3k said:
Great topic!
Guys tell me... Which one is better for better battery life?
YA-OK, SpeedMod or Super Optimized? (and best lag fix for stable and fast) all tweaks on?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
same question from me either...
guys pls put some light here..
Which one is better for using with Doc Froyo 8.0.1 ...
better in quadrant scores also...
thanks in advance..

Bo$s said:
I thnik you should read more about linux HZ parameter In this case HZ doesn't mean Hertz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
would you please explain this, then? it may be helpful to quite a few of us

alimur_r said:
same question from me either...
guys pls put some light here..
Which one is better for using with Doc Froyo 8.0.1 ...
better in quadrant scores also...
thanks in advance..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well, here's mine for the day:
loads of emails, about 8 blutetooth phone calls, combination of 3g, wifi etc. i think the key is using superpower app which really makes a huge difference. mine is set to enable data every 30mins for 3 mins. also using BLN and noLED.
but most important is i've never had a crash or freeze with this combination of rom, kernel and baseband:
Samsung Galaxy S 8GB GT-i9000 (UK unbranded version), Class 10 16gb microSD
Baseband: ADJP3
Firmware: DocRomV8_Nude&Raw.ADJP5 (rev 4)
Kernel: zenkinz YA-OK build 30 OC 1.2ghz, Hardcore Tweaks, BLN ON, Overkill lagfix without binds, NoLED
Theme: JPA_V7_Androdena_Galassia_Proper_Optimised_AOSP_Ex tended_Circle
Battery App: SuperPower XDA (3 days unplugged)

aatifahmad said:
would you please explain this, then? it may be helpful to quite a few of us
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=9301613&postcount=2305

tokyogtr said:
well, here's mine for the day:
Kernel: zenkinz YA-OK build 30 OC 1.2ghz, Hardcore Tweaks, BLN ON, Overkill lagfix without binds, NoLED
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry.. could U state exactly which lagfix U used in ULF?
There's 2 overkills.. JFS and EXT4.
I used JFS overkill and has freezes twice and moved down to JFS advanced.

I don't really like ya-ok. Looks like a more basic version of super optimized kernel.

artyte said:
I don't really like ya-ok. Looks like a more basic version of super optimized kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't just look, feel it
Thx to tokyo, it's my fav kernel now.

Probarly the best kernel out there
Came from SpeedMod kernel from Hardcore, which is also extremely well functioning (I1.2 stable verison). However, on my SGS, the YA-OK kernel is way faster and the feel of the phone is simply astonishing.
I'm on DOC's 7.6.2 (WXJPA) and with adv. ext4 lagfix + IOsched tweak. Phone is truly flying and finally faster than I can press the buttons - awesome!
Can't say much about battery for YA-OK, but with Hardcore's SpeedMod my SGS typically lasted 2 days (best 2,5 day). And that is push email (work and gmail), 3G on, no wifi, no gps, no bt.
Let's see how this YA-OK will do on battery? I'll report back later on...
So far - extremly well done work Zenkinz

teriemer said:
Can't say much about battery for YA-OK, but with Hardcore's SpeedMod my SGS typically lasted 2 days (best 2,5 day). And that is push email (work and gmail), 3G on, no wifi, no gps, no bt.
Let's see how this YA-OK will do on battery? I'll report back later on...
So far - extremly well done work Zenkinz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm using Speedmod K7-300Hz and with lagfix voodoo. (because of battery life)
There seems be a little laggy on my phone, I may think about other kernel, like YA-OK.
But battery lif is what I concern about.
Please let us know how about YA-OK on battery. Tks!

I've jumped to ya-ok, tried all the optimized kernels available. ya-ok feels the most smooth and balanced out, of course that's just me. you guys try it for yourself! lol
can't test battery yet until tomorrow
ps. shouldn't really post this in dev though.

tokyogtr said:
well, here's mine for the day:
loads of emails, about 8 blutetooth phone calls, combination of 3g, wifi etc. i think the key is using superpower app which really makes a huge difference. mine is set to enable data every 30mins for 3 mins. also using BLN and noLED.
but most important is i've never had a crash or freeze with this combination of rom, kernel and baseband:
Samsung Galaxy S 8GB GT-i9000 (UK unbranded version), Class 10 16gb microSD
Baseband: ADJP3
Firmware: DocRomV8_Nude&Raw.ADJP5 (rev 4)
Kernel: zenkinz YA-OK build 30 OC 1.2ghz, Hardcore Tweaks, BLN ON, Overkill lagfix without binds, NoLED
Theme: JPA_V7_Androdena_Galassia_Proper_Optimised_AOSP_Ex tended_Circle
Battery App: SuperPower XDA (3 days unplugged)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
awesome man....great..
thanks for the info...
everything explained by the screen shots..
Thanks again..

The poll needs YA-OK and Raspdeep's Mod...
At the moment im on YA-OK as it has similar overclocks to raspdeep with the tweak of color and sharpness
YA-OK is a winner for me at the moment

[KERNEL][KB1]OverStock v1.3 341MB, Voodoo Sound, Color, Lagfix, BLN 4/2/2011

This was made at the request of fellow XDA member/co-worker Rockasama. I showed him what I was doing on the Vibrant and he wanted something like it on his Captivate.
This kernel should be used just like a stock I897 kernel. All the same modem rules apply. What you get is a fast, efficient, and simple non OC'd kernel. Current testing shows mid 1700 to low 1800 Quadrant scores and 14's in Linpack. He's been running it for a day now and everything seems to be working. I don't have a Captivate so he's my guinea pig right now. As I make updates to my Vibrant kernel look for those to be ported over here.
Includes:
Version 1.3
Voodoo sound v7
Version 1.2
Voodoo sound v6
Version 1.1
Working Voodoo sound v4 with no issues in call quality
Version 1.0
Voodoo Sound v4 (Make sure to grab the Voodoo Control App from the market to fully utilize this feature)
Voodoo Color
Voodoo Lagfix
CIFS
BLN (Needs neldar's BLN Control app from the market, or grab the pay version for some sweet blinking action and more)
FPS cap removed(turn screen off once before running Quadrant to see it)
341MB Memory
Based on KB1 I897 Source
Use this at your own risk. Always make a backup before flashing. I would also recommend using neldar's SGS Kernel Flasher from the market to backup your current kernel.
I would like to thank the following people for making this possible:
Viralblack for the boot image PNG
morfic for all the help and making time to answer my questions
supercurio for all the Voodoo magic he has worked on SGS devices
neldar for the great BLN patch and Market app to use it
Download, Flash, and Enjoy!
OverStock-I897-KB1-v1_3.zip

Updated 3/12/2011
Look for updates and fixes to arrive on Monday evenings.
Messed around yesterday trying to make the kernel work on any modem. Not much success... I'll keep trying as I get time.

Downloaded.
I'll check this out over the weekend.
Thanks.

Trying it now.
For those that said, it'll take at least a couple of weeks to get a modified kernel out after the source drop, eat your words

Thanks SOOO much for working on this the past week or more, it has been rocking my battery time and speed. If you guys and gals aren't aware, this vibrant kernel version has been getting all the good press over on their forums!
Glad to have you with us over here cmenard!

First run of quadrant after reboot was 1328, second run 1771, third run 1812. This is a bit odd, because under the old setup of KB1 with voodoo lagfix injected by supercurio himself, Quandrant was alway hovering around 1550, never varying.
Addressable memory is upped to 341MB as advertised. Voodoo Control app recognizes the kernel. BLN , I don't use right now.
Great work. Will keep this kernel around until something comellingly better shows up. Any chance on adding OC/UV options to this?
P.S. - I guess the Quadrant score bump on second and third runs might have been due to turning the screen off after first run, resulting in FPS cap removal. I also like the OverStock boot logo.

Going to download and try this out. Thank you for your work on this.

NICE! Will take it for a spin this weekend!

Very interesting. I'm going to have to try this out over the weekend.

rajendra82 said:
First run of quadrant after reboot was 1328, second run 1771, third run 1812. This is a bit odd, because under the old setup of KB1 with voodoo lagfix injected by supercurio himself, Quandrant was alway hovering around 1550, never varying.
Addressable memory is upped to 341MB as advertised. Voodoo Control app recognizes the kernel. BLN , I don't use right now.
Great work. Will keep this kernel around until something comellingly better shows up. Any chance on adding OC/UV options to this?
P.S. - I guess the Quadrant score bump on second and third runs might have been due to turning the screen off after first run, resulting in FPS cap removal. I also like the OverStock boot logo.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you post a screen shot of the boot?

I getting reports of really bad static during phone calls. I can hear them fine. I tested with two different handsets on two different carriers.

CB650 Wolf said:
I getting reports of really bad static during phone calls. I can hear them fine. I tested with two different handsets on two different carriers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what modem are you trying to use with it?

Pirateghost said:
what modem are you trying to use with it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
KB1 from Cognition 4.1.1

CB650 Wolf said:
I getting reports of really bad static during phone calls. I can hear them fine. I tested with two different handsets on two different carriers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just left myself a voice mail message and hear the static at the receiving end.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App

CB650 Wolf said:
I getting reports of really bad static during phone calls. I can hear them fine. I tested with two different handsets on two different carriers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same thing here. I just tried it after reading this post, and I can hear fine but the other party complained of bad static.

what modem is recomended with this kernel?

Sounds like the audience chip is not getting used. Probably incomplete Samsung code. Can anyone that built from previous i897 Samsung sources guide the OP on what to add to invoke the audience chip logic. Since he is from the Vibrant camp, this is likely a new issue for him.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App

KM00 said:
what modem is recomended with this kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am sure you have to stay with KB1 modem.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App

Thanks for the feedback. We did our testing on Serendipity with it's included I9K modem. That was one of my concerns, was using the Voodoo sound with the Captivates unique sound architecture. I'll see if Rockasama wants to nuke his phone and run Cognition with the KB1 modem and we can start narrowing this down.

rajendra82 said:
Sounds like the audience chip is not getting used. Probably incomplete Samsung code. Can anyone that built from previous i897 Samsung sources guide the OP on what to add to invoke the audience chip logic. Since he is from the Vibrant camp, this is likely a new issue for him.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The code is in there. I patched Voodoo sound into it and may have missed something.

Any A501 ICS roms whcih support 3G?

Hi everyone,
just wondering if any ICS roms exist that support 3G yet. Alot of the reading that i have done around the internet is saying No, but some of these posts are over 3 weeks old and alot happens in 3 weeks here
Cheers.

iahawk said:
Hi everyone,
just wondering if any ICS roms exist that support 3G yet. Alot of the reading that i have done around the internet is saying No, but some of these posts are over 3 weeks old and alot happens in 3 weeks here
Cheers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The answer is yes.
One you will find at tegraowners. But it's ify-ify on a 501 (3g drops, display freeze OC/UV issue and slow GPS)
Another is currently in work (I can verify 3g, gps and wifi works), but it just started development from google source. We should have a good working version soon I hope.

Moscow Desire said:
The answer is yes.
One you will find at tegraowners. But it's ify-ify on a 501 (3g drops, display freeze OC/UV issue and slow GPS)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The freezing should be fixable by upping the voltages, no?

FloatingFatMan said:
The freezing should be fixable by upping the voltages, no?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
One would suppose doing a +25mv across all frequencies might fix it, but without knowing how the mainboard distributes power, it'd be 50/50. As in PC mainboards, you can supply different voltage to processor, memory, and gpu. I would guess maybe the acer mainboard might be similar?
But the 3g dropping connection every couple minutes isn't good. Also given the fact the wifi and 3g run at the same time, seems a waste of resources. Of course it's still early in development (3g internal) so maybe the issues will eventually get worked out.
Another things that worries me, is when you have built-in OC functions, and then add System Tuner to adjust voltages, makes me wonder which has priority. In my mind, you should only have 1 OC/UV app running at any given time.

Moscow Desire said:
One would suppose doing a +25mv across all frequencies might fix it, but without knowing how the mainboard distributes power, it'd be 50/50. As in PC mainboards, you can supply different voltage to processor, memory, and gpu. I would guess maybe the acer mainboard might be similar?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If he's undervolting, then restoring to stock voltages should be enough.
Moscow Desire said:
But the 3g dropping connection every couple minutes isn't good. Also given the fact the wifi and 3g run at the same time, seems a waste of resources. Of course it's still early in development (3g internal) so maybe the issues will eventually get worked out.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Official ROMs automatically disable the 3G connection when WiFi is enabled. Clearly more work is needed there.
Moscow Desire said:
Another things that worries me, is when you have built-in OC functions, and then add System Tuner to adjust voltages, makes me wonder which has priority. In my mind, you should only have 1 OC/UV app running at any given time.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Does seems rather silly to run two...

FloatingFatMan said:
If he's undervolting, then restoring to stock voltages should be enough..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, but without source ....cough...cough, One can only guess what voltage changes are made to other areas besides CPU frequencies. Also, I believe the default settings are probably UV already. But, we shall never know

One of the not unsubstantial pitfalls of refusing to release your source.

Veno

This thread is to showcase before and after speed increase/decrease that you may get from using either one of the Kernels that have this implemented..
I request you do the following..
1: State your Rom
2: State your Kernel
3: State your before speed
4: program used to verify speed
This thread is not a Q&A thread..
It is also not a thread about which is the best Kernel to use..
It is a thread that the developers can refer to to get an idea whether it is worth while to implement "Veno" and or any other Wireless coding to help improve input & output of our devices and the wireless chips/programming that supports them..
I will quote ricardopvz.. if he does not mind.. (Ricardo.. PM me if you have a problem with this)
Wifi is definitely better with test16. Where I had 36Mbps, now I have 54Mbps.
Page loading may be a little faster, but needs some more testing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=25136849&postcount=721

dgcruzing said:
I request you do the following..
1: State your Rom
2: State your Kernel
3: State your before speed
4: program used to verify speed
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Using the same application for testing internet speed and benchmark for result consistency... like quadrant & speedtest.net..
Here is the result after veno:
Megatron v 1.0.4 @ 1600mhz
Guevor test16 - veno
Speedtest.net
download - 1986kbps
upload - 372kbps
Quadrant score - 4069
will post shortly after flashing other kernels...

AOKP Build 33
1.504mhz - 216mhz - Interactive
Test16 kernel
SIO (M.S) read ahead 2048kb
SD read ahead 1024kb
Dalvik byte code false build.prop tweaks etc
wifi bluetooth etc untouched
Before veno and after veno no difference at all in fact in most speed tests veno got slightly less but then seemed a little quicker in other respects eg browsing at times so the tests did not help me make a definative decision.
I really don't know what to think on this but I would like to see more improvements like this and see our kernels and all round speed improve
Sorry in advance for any spelling mistakes AOKP still has a borked autocorrect and my spelling lacks in every respect lol
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using XDA Premium HD app

1 - ARHD 3.2.0
2 - TastyMehIcs .8 (before) 1.0 (After)
3- Before 8Mbps After 12Mbps
4- Speedtest.net app.
The real improvement seemed to be in responsiveness, link clicks aren't lost asmuch

Megatron v 1.0.4 @ 1200mhz
Guevor test15 & test16
Speedtest.net
Measurements:
Time Download Upload Ping Server
test15
1:38PM 3347kbps 1615kbps 47ms Veendam
1:39PM 3328kbps 1560kbps 51ms Veendam
1:41PM 3183kbps 1595kbps 20ms Mechelen
test16
1:44PM 3146kbps 1566kbps 17ms Mechelen
1:45PM 3092kbps 1639kbps 19ms Mechelen
1:56PM 3285kbps 1629kbps 17ms Mechelen
back to test15
2:08PM 6367kbps 1628kbps 22ms Mechelen
2:09PM 4434kbps 1592kbps 19ms Mechelen
2:14PM 3030kbps 1330kbps 19ms Mechelen
As you can see time and server can have an influence on the results, so you can't just do one measurement before and one after to make a conclusion.

Yes, I am having this thought too..
Was going though test programs yesterday..
At this stage "ping" can only be the true medium you can test this.
Or using a samba drive attached to your WiFi network and download upload the same file and different kernel settings using a monitor program to get average speeds..
As using results from multi pads connected to the internet brings too many variables into the data..
i.e..users downstream internet speed once it leaves the local network..
What we really want is "local" WiFi to pad increases.. as its the tweaking of this that will allow for incremental increases (hopefully) of the user experience in the downstream leg of the connection.
sent from yet another MikG HTC Evo

4.2.2 roms and 5ghz 300mbit connections

Am I the only one that can't connect my N10 @ 300mbit on 5ghz with the newer ROMs (Paranoid Android excluded)? I've tried Liquid, Carbon, PAC, etc - Paranoid is the only build with support. All others max out at 130. 300mbit is important if streaming from the NAS (main purpose of my tablet). Hopefully some of the devs will read this. I have an Asus rtn-66u. Tried different (lower channels), channel width, legacy/n only, you name it. PA passes with flying colors - help?

The actual speed is no where near 300 mbps anyway so it shouldn't matter. I haven't seen the Nexus 10 able to pull more than a stable 40~ mbps even if you get within 5 feet and line of sight of the router with your hands out of the way and the antennae of both devices lined up with each other. The wifi in these tablets is just that bad.
A standard compressed 1080p movie is usually a total of 20 mbps anyway, and a full bluray version is normally 30 mbps of data I think.

The link speed should still be able to be reported as 300 if it is using both antenna? I'm just wondering if something was overlooked on these other roms that PA gets right. I guess I could compare real world ftp vs the seperate ROMs and report back.
OK. Carbon ROM @130mbit on 5ghz 500mb file, max ftp 6100Kb/sec.
PA @ 300mbit 5ghz same 500mb file, ftp was 7200Kb/sec. Just one test, should be done at least seven times, but 1Mb/sec is a difference. Back with PA.

The main question is does it make that big of difference? I mean I can stream the 1440p timescapes video over my 2.4 wireless n router at 65mbit and it looks just as great as if it was on the tablet itself...
At 130 you should be able to do about anything...
I dont know Mabey I just don't understand...

the_boo said:
The main question is does it make that big of difference? I mean I can stream the 1440p timescapes video over my 2.4 wireless n router at 65mbit and it looks just as great as if it was on the tablet itself...
At 130 you should be able to do about anything...
I dont know Mabey I just don't understand...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you stream using ftp or dnla/smb? Wish I could figure out NFS to get it working.
Either way, where did the 300mbit go?

My Nexus connects on the 5 GHz band just fine, wifi shows 270 Mbps link speed, and a quick test I just did got me 12.200 kbps in download (this is with an emule client also running on the same line).
Rom is latest MrRobinson's AOKP PUB with KTManta kernel.

Tried Mr Robinson's aroma aokp with ktmanta kernel. Wifi performance was pretty much half (maxed at 3000Kbytes/sec). Connection was reported as 130mbit. What channel settings are you using on your router?
Flashed back to PA and I'm back to 7000Kbytes+.

xrecartp said:
Tried Mr Robinson's aroma aokp with ktmanta kernel. Wifi performance was pretty much half (maxed at 3000Kbytes/sec). Connection was reported as 130mbit. What channel settings are you using on your router?
Flashed back to PA and I'm back to 7000Kbytes+.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's on auto; right now using channel 44.
I must say wifi analyzer only shows my access point, so there are probably no collisions, and the router is about a meter from me (but with two monitors in the line of sight).

Arcano said:
It's on auto; right now using channel 44.
I must say wifi analyzer only shows my access point, so there are probably no collisions, and the router is about a meter from me (but with two monitors in the line of sight).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What channel width? 20, 20/40, or 40? Back on AOKP trying every combination.
Hard for me to believe your tablet is reporting 270. Picture or it didn't happen j/k.
*pulls hair out*

xrecartp said:
What channel width? 20, 20/40, or 40? Back on AOKP trying every combination.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My router does not have such a setting, only "up to 54 Mbps", "up to 130 Mbps" and "up to 300 Mbps".
But looking at 802.11n specs I would imagine that means it is using a channel width of 40.

Well, thanks for trying to to help. Tried the lower channels. Even tried turning encryption off (open system). 130 seems to be the ceiling for me on these other ROMs. I really liked the feel of Robinson's AOKP.

xrecartp said:
Hard for me to believe your tablet is reporting 270. Picture or it didn't happen j/k.
*pulls hair out*
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here you are, a screenshot showing my wifi connection, and the speed test.
It's in Spanish, but I guess you will be able to understand it.
(I've masked out identifiable data).

Arcano said:
Here you are, a screenshot showing my wifi connection, and the speed test.
It's in Spanish, but I guess you will be able to understand it.
(I've masked out identifiable data).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the info.
Just don't understand why stock and PA seem to function differently.

*workaround* When I am on USA region WiFi, 5ghz only reaches 130mbit. When I "lie" and tell the ROM I am in Brazil (lol) , I can obtain the full 300 Mbit connection. Maybe you can pass this onto the other devs. Must be a bug.

Pardon me, but how do I change the country setting ?
Sent from my Nexus 10 using xda app-developers app

Try a different kernel. franco.Kernel specifically has a newer WiFi driver which may or may not help out with speeds.
I have a NETGEAR R6200 (like 800mbit or something advertised speeds over some non-standardized kind of WiFi lol). Nexus 10 is only reporting 162mbit when connected over 5GHz, but I'm using rasbeanhjelly + Trinity (TX34).