Related
try this to speed up your pocket pc, good programs , try for xda II at 530 mhz
I would have prefered you post all the warnings of using such utlity ... for some unexperienced users this could permanently damage their devices.
For all folks here ... pay all attention to the heat while working on high speeds ... and don't ever try ROM flashing on any speed but the default one (206 for XDA and 400 for XDA II)
Ive been running Gameboy Advance and SNES roms, using XPU scalar @ 530Mhz for hours and hours. The device gets VERY hot after 5 hours, but it still fights on without a restart...
Although, ive tried other clocking apps @ 600mhz and then it got so hot it restarted itself...
I use Pocket Hack Master and have had my device up to 1689Mhz without any ill effects, though this is apparently unusually quick for an XdaII - the SDRAM usually can't handle 147MHz.
With PHM, mine scales between 399MHz and 589MHz depending purely on load, I've been using it for about three months with no apparent problems.
I tried it on i-mate ... the device is frozen if I use 530 MHz
Mine runs fine at 530 and 473... I even did a benchmark in BetaPlayer; huge improvement at 530; however, I decided to back it off to 400 to save on batteries.
Biso007 said:
I tried it on i-mate ... the device is frozen if I use 530 MHz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Probably the SDRAM can't handle the 133MHz - it's the first thing that usually falls over. You could put the multiplier down to 1/2x from 1x and it would probably work but that would mean your RAM was only running at 66MHz.
ok i must be real tired...
how the heck do you install this program from those files??
Questions :
- At 472 MHz as well as at 530 MHz, the memory is underclocked (50 - 66 MHz). I ask if it would be possible to maintain the memory around 100 MHz (+/- 10 MHz) during the overclock.
- Does the XScale CPU have the frequency fixed at 400 MHz ? Intel didn't think to dinamical frequence switch ? (like in Centrino or P4M) ? Because if not, then this software would allow battery economy. But it's weird, Intel wasn't able to do the same thing ???
With PHM you can choose whether to 1/2x or 1x clock the SDRAM and the LCD. I use 1x, so when I'm running the CPU at 590, the memory is running at 147MHz, most Xda II's won't handle this but it appears I was really lucky and got very good RAM in mine.
Mi_ said:
Questions :
- At 472 MHz as well as at 530 MHz, the memory is underclocked (50 - 66 MHz). I ask if it would be possible to maintain the memory around 100 MHz (+/- 10 MHz) during the overclock.
- Does the XScale CPU have the frequency fixed at 400 MHz ? Intel didn't think to dinamical frequence switch ? (like in Centrino or P4M) ? Because if not, then this software would allow battery economy. But it's weird, Intel wasn't able to do the same thing ???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you sure in underclocked? I am sure the memory clock is set to standard freq. with all the benefits,like stability and faster processor clock (472-530)
You can verify it downloading other Overclocking applications,like made from Mamaich.
I verify with CPUID, it shows all PDA frequencies. I can post screenshots, at 530 MHz, the memory runs in 66 MHz.
That's why I posted my question.
err..so whats the best setting when using the XCPUScaler?
And how come cannot access settings for over 500Mhz? Mine goes up to 475only
In Option select 'show frequencies over 500mhz'
Mi_ said:
I verify with CPUID, it shows all PDA frequencies. I can post screenshots, at 530 MHz, the memory runs in 66 MHz.
That's why I posted my question.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Use Mamaich Overclock program with:
L 27
M 4
N 1,5
You will obtain SDRAM and MEM LCD 100mhz,CPU 597mhz PXBUS 199mhz
I've Benchmarked it with GX BenchMark with no good results.
So,best performance for gaming you will obtain on 530Mhz
unapproachable2kx said:
Use Mamaich Overclock program with:
L 27
M 4
N 1,5
You will obtain SDRAM and MEM LCD 100mhz,CPU 597mhz PXBUS 199mhz
I've Benchmarked it with GX BenchMark with no good results.
So,best performance for gaming you will obtain on 530Mhz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Done that.
But at 530 MHz, my memory cames down to 66 MHz thus not 133 MHz, I think it doesn't support anything above 100-105 MHz.
Now I want to benchmark myself , I'll try to find GX Benchmark.
I only regret the downclocking function of CPUScalar, that saves battery (can somebody confirm ?)
Re: download xpu scalar (speed up ur ppc to 530 mhz) for fre
Prada said:
try this to speed up your pocket pc, good programs , try for xda II at 530 mhz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Could you tell me how to install even I copied all the files to my XDA2 .[/quote]
After many hard-resets,installation of system files and progrs..
I can finally assure that CALLER-ID program seriously give conflicts on overclocked Cpu frequencies,more than 472Mhz..(like 530,ecc..)
And drains more battery power.
Just let you know..
Now is your choice..
To tell u the truth, i use xCPUScalar for a month in advanced mode:
0-15% - 300
16-40% -400
41-70% -472
71 -100 -530 and have no problems at all.
BTW - CallerID is a very uncertain subj by itself.
i also use xCPUScalar for a month in advanced mode:
0-15% - 200
16-40% -400
41-70% -400
71 -100 -472 and have no problems at all.
But I don't see where I can get over the 472 limit??
I have a XDA (QTEK 2020) with a 400MHZ chip.
I see you guys talking about 500 and more sometime???
and this is possible, where XCPUScalar indicate 472 MAX ?
Thank you
PS: OK I get it, I just forget to enable the "show frequency over 500MHZ"
Now I see 530MHZ.
Juste hope it's fine like this.
Aparently the CPU may only be clocked to 800Mhz........
If you got this from the Au website, Whirlpool, than I think they are talking about the iPhone 4, not the Galaxy S
well it's from the galaxy s thread and one of the guy who's doing the testing and stuff for samsung says this......definitely not iphone.
Guess just wait and see when it's released I suppose
huh? wat are you guys talking about? its 1ghz cpu
forums.whirlpool.net.au/forum-replies.cfm?t=1409745&p=58#r1152 is the link to the post where the user suggests it is 800mhz underclocked.
Yh, sorry, was reading a thread where they were talking about the iPhone being underclocked, just reading more, it seems it may be the case.
Will mean battery last longer, not such a bad thing, as long as it doesn't effect any of the performance of the phone
If they say 1Ghz then it is 1Ghz or else they're going to have a lawsuit on their hands. Nothing in between(except of course scaling).
I have the galaxy s and im pretty sure its 1ghz.. at least system panel tells me its 1ghz but singapore set are all 16gb model.
information from system panel:
ARMv7 Processor rev 2 (v7I)
bogomips 797.90 (may vary)
min clock 100mhz
max clock 1000mhz
on Nexus one using pershoot kernel but cpuset at 245mhz - 998mhz, it shows:
ARMv7 processor rev 2 (v7I)
bogomips 662.40 (may vary)
min clock 245 mhz
max clock 998mhz
so maybe the 8gb are down clocked?
Doubt the 8Gb version would be clocked lower. Thanks for posting your findings!
It's just the power of forums and the internet, allowing mis-information to spread at the speed of light
lol yep, looks like he was confused at the sliding clock speed....
when i ran quandrant standard it read armv7 processor rev 2 , max 1000 min 100
set frequency 800
is that normal
regards
It's 1 GHz, I checked the clock frequency with a monitoring application and it's dynamic but when required it clocks up to 1 GHz.
Intratech said:
It's 1 GHz, I checked the clock frequency with a monitoring application and it's dynamic but when required it clocks up to 1 GHz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks for clearing this up
regards
Wait, what?
The iPhone 4 may be clocked at 800mhz?
Can someone give source on this?
Pika007 said:
Wait, what?
The iPhone 4 may be clocked at 800mhz?
Can someone give source on this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't have a link to that claim, but I think it was Gizmodo in their testing of the iPhone 4 and iPad noted the iPad did feel faster and the web browser rendered pages faster, despite both using the A4 processor. They hypothesised that it is the same architecture CPU in both, but different clock speeds.
After all, to get 10 hours out of the iPad the teardowns and x-ray scans show about 80% of the volume inside is all battery. If the iPhone 4 and iPad had the same processor, you'd think the iPhone's battery would be pretty bad considering the far smaller volume (although smaller screen not sucking as much power).
Wouldn't be surprising. After all, the Motorola Milestone / Droid has a mild underclock, as does the Acer Liquid to preserve battery life.
Probably cheaper for Apple to only have to manufacture 1 chip (the A4), but clock at different speeds appropriate to each device's battery life.
Apple doesn't focus as much on specs though, more that the user interface feels fast and smooth. If it achieves that purpose no need to worry about numbers, whereas since we have so much choice of handsets on Android specs do make a difference for us to know depending on our needs (eg: price vs performance vs battery).
My Samsung Galaxy S is running at 800mhz it sucks... i flashed it last night with the final build of 2.2 I9000XXjP6 for the Galaxy does anybody no how i can overclock it to 1ghz thanks People
The Galaxy S has a 1 GHz CPU. However, the clock speed is lowered while not needed to save battery life, just like on any modern PC. By default it is using the conservative governor.
The iPhone4 never was supposed to get a 1 GHz CPU. Apple never disclosed the number. But those who made benchmarks estimated the clock speed at about 800 MHz since is is about 20% slower than the iPad.
There is a Galaxy Lite version in some other countries that only maxes out at 800 Mhz
i think the guy reviewing the phone got it mixed up with that
AllGamer said:
There is a Galaxy Lite version in some other countries that only maxes out at 800 Mhz
i think the guy reviewing the phone got it mixed up with that
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He might have got mixed up, but the final 2.2 build for the Samsung Galaxy S is maxed out at 800 MHz for some stupid reason…. I’m going to flash it tonight again with a earlier build of 2.2 as I did some bench test and its only scoring a measly 900 points with the latest firmware installed.. Were as before it was scoring well over 2k…
Can someone test if underclocking works using setCPU.
I believe you have to be rooted.
I live in Canada and it hasn't been announced here yet.
This should probably be merged with the overclocking thread or locked, but I believe they are discussing something similar there.
RacecarBMW said:
Can someone test if underclocking works using setCPU.
I believe you have to be rooted.
I live in Canada and it hasn't been announced here yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think setCPU works with the tegra 2
Thank you guys.
But can someone that has received the Atrix test it out.
I've tried to use setcpu it forcecloses everytime.
The Dell Streak 7 also uses this chipset. It is underclocked stock to 800mhz. Maybe you could pull their work apart and come up with a script. I honestly know nothing about it so I probably sound stupid, just an idea.
Sent from my SGH-I897 using XDA App
fc on set cpu
i get a force close every time as well
Ok thank you guys.
It would be cool if we could control each core in setCPU.
Yeah I was wondering if it was just me...but fc evwrytime
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
I feel obligated to point out the irony of a guy with a BMW M badge as his avatar asking to underclock the CPU on his phone.
Coldskiesfullofblue said:
The Dell Streak 7 also uses this chipset. It is underclocked stock to 800mhz. Maybe you could pull their work apart and come up with a script. I honestly know nothing about it so I probably sound stupid, just an idea.
Sent from my SGH-I897 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Where did you hear it was underclocked to 800Mhz? Every review and the official spec sheet says 1Ghz Tegra 2 processor.
I could be wrong, but don't you need a kernel that supports under and over clocking before setCPU is actually useful?
hotleadsingerguy said:
Where did you hear it was underclocked to 800Mhz? Every review and the official spec sheet says 1Ghz Tegra 2 processor.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He was saying the dell streak is underclocked to 800mhz, ours is full 1 ghz on both cores. Don't worry
Droid Incredible Rooted!
lorimer said:
I feel obligated to point out the irony of a guy with a BMW M badge as his avatar asking to underclock the CPU on his phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol I know I was just wondering because Imagine the battery life if we could make 1 of the 2 cores really low.
Im just being realistic. Thanks for noticing the ///M badge
Having dissimilar static core speeds would make for a wonky system because of the S in SMP.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
andrew53517 said:
He was saying the dell streak is underclocked to 800mhz, ours is full 1 ghz on both cores. Don't worry
Droid Incredible Rooted!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Right...I got that.
What I was saying is the Dell Streak 7 (the one that uses the Tegra) runs at 1Ghz as far as I know...all of the spec sheets say 1Ghz
RacecarBMW said:
lol I know I was just wondering because Imagine the battery life if we could make 1 of the 2 cores really low.
Im just being realistic. Thanks for noticing the ///M badge
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you cant have 2 cores running at different speeds.... nor could i see why you would want to. if you want to increase battery life you would throttle both cores, like you do on a laptop when you want to get some more juice.
hotleadsingerguy said:
Right...I got that.
What I was saying is the Dell Streak 7 (the one that uses the Tegra) runs at 1Ghz as far as I know...all of the spec sheets say 1Ghz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It was underclocked to 800mhz for added battery.
http://www.netbooknews.com/18979/de...at-performance-but-poor-display-battery-life/
Sent from my SGH-I897 using XDA App
Setcpu on the market can now do this. I have everything default but my screen off max i reduced to around 600mhz.
Tks everyone. I think I have enough info and GPU OC has been work properly
PVS Binning : 3
Frequency Table : 230
So my phone is less badass?
@[email protected] said:
PVS Binning : 3
Frequency Table : 230
So my phone is less badass?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, but u phone still kick some butt on OCing:laugh::laugh:
Qualcomm produce same batch of chip for Snap 800 series and only use high binning chip to make further 801, 805....
To identify binning for each chip, they tested every chip.
Check using Pimp my Z1.
PVS Binning: 5
Frequency table: 250
wow mine is 2 :crying:
frequency table 220
gandalf_grey91 said:
Check using Pimp my Z1.
PVS Binning: 5
Frequency table: 250
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lucky guy.............
Pvs binning: 4
Frequency table: 240
PVS Binning: 4
Frequency Table: 340
From Iran
why should they be different??!
NiM72NiK said:
PVS Binning: 4
Frequency Table: 340
From Iran
why should they be different??!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Variance in electrical components is very common, hence why some phones can handle overclock and undervolt much more than others
NiM72NiK said:
PVS Binning: 4
Frequency Table: 340
From Iran
why should they be different??!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Freq table =340 ? 240?
I'm surprised you guys don't know this but we z1 users have a snapdragon 800 vv and guys instead of overclocking you should focus on undervolting and underclocking because even at 200 MHz GPU max and 1.6 GHz CPU max with -95mv undervolt I have no performance drops in gaming(dead trigger,avabel,etc) compared to stock except the heat has reduced and battery is a bit longer...
Lastly look at the screens in the post after the next post
BlackSoulxxx said:
Freq table =340 ? 240?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
340 my friend
Screens
The last screen is to show that I get this battery while using an HD live wallpaper
NiM72NiK said:
340 my friend
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Screenshot?Interesting.................
Got mine last year, November or so...
PVS Binning : 3
Frequency Table : 230
PVS Binning : 3
Frequency Table : 230
I feel sorry for the 2 votes for 1
Myself I'm on 4/240 which seems to be the most common so far. I never heard about this before but it's pretty interesting
BlackSoulxxx said:
Screenshot?Interesting.................
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
actually i dont get what are these numbers..but what is different when i'm now on 340??
NiM72NiK said:
actually i dont get what are these numbers..but what is different when i'm now on 340??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
U devices is crazy man...... If is true, I will call Qualcomm by my self
BlackSoulxxx said:
U devices is crazy man...... If is true, I will call Qualcomm by my self
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
last antutu test gave me 25000 score are still want to call them?!
btw what can i do know that others cant?
First of all sorry if I posted in the wrong place please someone guide me to where it is supposed to be if i did post in the wrong place, so I have an I9500 running CM13, I downloaded kernal auditor from the Google play store and noticed that I only have the option of editing 4 cores and they all have a Max limit of 1600MHz so I'm assuming those are the A15 set of cores,, so my question is pretty simple, does my current rom make use of both the A7 and A15 clusters (I am aware that they never run simultaneously) I'll include pictures about details on my rom, thanks in advance
Well the screenshot refuses to be uploaded so:
CyanogenMod version: 13.0-20160828-unofficial-gearCM-i9500
Kernal version: 3.4.5-cyanogenmod-gd795889
[email protected] #1
Sun Aug 28 22:30:39 CEST 2016
Build number: cm_I9500-userdebug 6.0.1 MOB30Z
2c597c319e
Test-keys
It could also be that Kernel Adiutor can't access the A7 cores.
big.LITTLE mechanism on i9500 is a little bit unique, because frequency tables are merged.
800 (700 if underclocked) until 1600 (up to 2000 if overclocked) for A15 core, while 250 (as low as 100 if underclocked) until 600 (about 650-750 if overclocked) for A7 core.
If frequency bumps to 800 MHz or higher, A15 core is used, besides that A7 core is used.
Hope this could understand you.
Sent from my ASUS_Z00A using XDA Labs
krasCGQ said:
big.LITTLE mechanism on i9500 is a little bit unique, because frequency tables are merged.
800 (700 if underclocked) until 1600 (up to 2000 if overclocked) for A15 core, while 250 (as low as 100 if underclocked) until 600 (about 650-750 if overclocked) for A7 core.
If frequency bumps to 800 MHz or higher, A15 core is used, besides that A7 core is used.
Hope this could understand you.
Sent from my ASUS_Z00A using XDA Labs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yup just like kras said so if it shows lower than 800 then it shows the little cores, for example, 600mhz in kernel adiutor is actually 1200mhz a7 freq, 500mhz is 1000mhz a7 and so on
krasCGQ said:
big.LITTLE mechanism on i9500 is a little bit unique, because frequency tables are merged.
800 (700 if underclocked) until 1600 (up to 2000 if overclocked) for A15 core, while 250 (as low as 100 if underclocked) until 600 (about 650-750 if overclocked) for A7 core.
If frequency bumps to 800 MHz or higher, A15 core is used, besides that A7 core is used.
Hope this could understand you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So the A15 cores would never run below 800 (or 700 if under clocked)?
jwchen17 said:
yup just like kras said so if it shows lower than 800 then it shows the little cores, for example, 600mhz in kernel adiutor is actually 1200mhz a7 freq, 500mhz is 1000mhz a7 and so on
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I see so 200MHz on kernal auditor would actually be 400MHz A7 etc. That poses another question, I understand that the A15 cores CAN on stock image run at below 800MHz, or is that incorrect
The mad charizard99 said:
So the A15 cores would never run below 800 (or 700 if under clocked)?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, that's how the CPU works.
The mad charizard99 said:
I see so 200MHz on kernal auditor would actually be 400MHz A7 etc. That poses another question, I understand that the A15 cores CAN on stock image run at below 800MHz, or is that incorrect
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No. Below 800 MHz it would switch to A7 core respectively.
Sent from my ASUS_Z00A using XDA Labs