How many difference Model for GSM ? frequency wise.
I just wonder is it multi-frequency chip control by software or difference chip.
Different "chip" as you call it, not software.
Related
Since there are a lot of talk about atnts release, I thought I might bring this up.
http://blog.naver.com/themickyd?Red...mpingVid=30C218837DFC3995B2DD231E17F531B10E29
Featuring a comparison of the Korean LTE model (Black) and and International Model (White).
There are two videos:
1. Boot time comparison
2. Video comparison
I'll do a rough translation of the text. My Korean isn't that great so don't expect perfection..
========================================================
[Galaxy Note] Galaxy note 3g(international) vs Galaxy note LTE(Korea) comparison (thickness and normal functions)
[insert pictures of the two notes]
Hi this is Mickey. Today we're going to compare the Galaxy note 3g and the Galaxy note LTE. On the left is the white international model, and the right is the Korean LTE model.
[insert picture of the two notes with specs]
3G model: Exynos 4210, FM radio, ???, 3G, warranty not available in korea
LTE model: Snapdragon APQ, DMB, ???, 4G LTE and 3G compatible, warranty available in Korea
Let's take a look at the difference in specs first. The 3g model sports an exynos 1.4GHz, the LTE model has a snapdragon 1.5GHz. There isn't really much of a difference in speed in normal use. Very rarely there is a difference in S Memo.
Galaxy note 3g mode --- blah blah --- * this talks about the phone plans. 3g mode doesn't need a contract -- blah blah
[insert another picture]
3g model has Fm radio while LTE model has DMB. The 3g model has a video maker application. I don't really see a big use for this.
[insert boot comparison video]
Galaxy note 3g and LTE boot speed comparison. Booting is roughly the same, wish a very small difference. The 3g version has a lot of apps installed due to development work, while the LTE is out of the box. You can say that the 3g model boots up just a little faster.
[insert croc picture]
Checking responsiveness of stylus between the models. I failed to prepare the video for this. The 3g model felt faster right out of the box, but after all of the apps on the 3g model (development stuff), the LTE model out of the box seems faster. As you can also see in the picture, the color contrast seems different.
[insert thickness picture]
Comparing thickness, the LTE model looks a little bigger due to DMB.
[Insert video comparison]
Playing a 1080p SNSD music video. Playing works well on both, and so does the playing progress bar.
[insert back picture, stylus picture]
Just talks about pen color --blah blah--
So we saw the difference between both phones. There's definitely pros and cons for one or the other. You can't say one's better than the other. Hope this helps choosing the right phone for you.
This is consistent with this English review of the Korean LTE Note:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zd9Pa8jZYW0&context=C37f0d84ADOEgsToPDskJCqhTX3QBpAn2vXlpGm_Ll
There have been lots of reports of dissatisfaction with the Korean Note, but the few reviews I've seen by actual users have been positive. I'm reassured that battery life and responsiveness are not an issue some people claimed they would be.
Hi there!
I currently have the Galaxy Nexus phone and i'm looking to replace it with a new-ish phone. I heard about how good is the Galaxy SII but the "Plus" version has just come out with slightly improved specs.
But my question is about the audio chip inside. Is it the same as the original SII (which was rather poor and has bad audio output/reproduction) or the much older and original Galaxy S? Is it the Wolfson or the Yamaha chip?
Please advice. Thanks.
Not sure yet...
From what I can gather, the only difference between the two is an improved video core for the SII Plus.
Not much information has been revealed, but apparently the main chip set is the same.
Keep an eye out for more information, and be sure to think hard before you buy
Peace,
shandy1996
I wonder if someone made some test with the Galaxy S4 using the auxiliary input of a sound with the 3.5 plug male.
I ask this because the Galaxy S3 has a reduction in sound quality when connected to an external device that it's horrible.
Compared to any other phone, the Galaxy S3 loses by this reduction of sound, requiring the installation of applications to improve a bit.
Does anybody know if the Galaxy S3 to S4 are equal in this regard?
maurobonder said:
I wonder if someone made some test with the Galaxy S4 using the auxiliary input of a sound with the 3.5 plug male.
I ask this because the Galaxy S3 has a reduction in sound quality when connected to an external device that it's horrible.
Compared to any other phone, the Galaxy S3 loses by this reduction of sound, requiring the installation of applications to improve a bit.
Does anybody know if the Galaxy S3 to S4 are equal in this regard?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have seen videos of everything but this kind of comparison but I can tell you this, the Galaxy S4 puts out much better sounds then the S3 and has a better chipset, odds are this will not be an issue but I can't say for sure, just my take on it.
I have my doubts because I had iphone 2G, 3G, 3GS and when I bought the Galaxy S3, the audio in car sound particularly disappointed me a lot.
And I buy the Galaxy S4, need to know if it has improved or not.
If anyone knows, I appreciate the help.
i found a article that show a few informations about this subject.
in S3 when something was connected to the output quality was reduced to 3.5 (from -92.6 to -53.1) and now in tests in S4 reduction is small (from -96.4 to -95.5) which makes me think it was resolved.
Right?
Ops. I found more information regarding these graphs is that the 9500 model has a new audio chip (Wolfson), but does not support LTE.
The i9505 that supports LTE is the same audio chip S3, so if you care about sound, it is better to opt for GS4 9500
galaxy s 4 good sound
androidlebell said:
galaxy s 4 good sound
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you test using external ?
It´s good ? are Sure ?
maurobonder said:
Ops
The i9505 that supports LTE is the same audio chip S3, so if you care about sound, it is better to opt for GS4 9500
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The I9505 that supports LTE does not have the same audio chip that S3 has. S3's is Wolfson WM 1811 whilst the i9505 has built-in qualcomm based Snapdragon S4's audio chip.
And I assume you mentioned the S3's I9300 variant.
thekoRngear said:
The I9505 that supports LTE does not have the same audio chip that S3 has. S3's is Wolfson WM 1811 whilst the i9505 has built-in qualcomm based Snapdragon S4's audio chip.
And I assume you mentioned the S3's I9300 variant.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe I did mess. In short, what chip is best? Wolfson or qualcomm?
What s4 chip and each uses? i9500 and i9505?
the stock sound is alright, it's loud, that's for sure, but having come from Boffela sound on the s3, I must be spoiled because I'm left wanting more. I tried Adapt Sound, and some other sound gimmicky apps in the market, but have yet to really find anything good. ideally a 5 band hardware equalizer would be nice, but as that's not gonna happen anytime soon, anyone else have any sound tuning methods in the mean time?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using xda app-developers app
The international version of GSIII has a wolfson audio chip, the US version has a qualcomm chip. Hence the quality difference.
Hi,
I would like to know if the Galaxy S4 SGH-i337m (Canadian with Rogers) has the same Audio IC chip as here : https://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/Samsung+Galaxy+S4+Teardown/13947
it is the Qualcomm WCD9310.
I can't find any information on the audio IC chip for the SGH-i337m and would like to know if it is compatible with the WCD9310 because I want to change it.
Thank you
I confirm that it is the Qualcomm WCD9310. It is written in really small on the chip.
Hi everyone,
after reading almost every topic, test and comparison between the F and the C models, i still have a couple of question
it seems that the exynos model is slightly supperior to the snapdragon
what about the battery life of the two models on marshmallow ?
i read that they were two cameras, but are there really any differences ?
i am based in france, therefore with the C model i may not be able to use 4G, (i don't really care as my 4g is already turned of on my current phone), but will i see difference regarding gps, or cellular ?
many thanks for your help !
The Exynos 5433 is actually the superior chipset in my personal opinion as it is a 64bit Octocore SOC rather than a Quadcore 32bit SOC that the Snapdragon 805 is. While the Snapdragon 805 may have a higher clock speed rate, it has the tendency to run full throttle when doing anything. Which causes it to overheat pretty easily. The Exynos 5433 has a higher clocked Quadcore SOC for tasks that require allot of processing power and a lower clocked Quadcore SOC, which is used for general everyday use or tasks which require less processing power. Battery life is much better for the Exynos 5433 as it is more energy efficient than the Snapdragon 805. Camera performance is more or less the same with the only difference is that the Exynos 5433 uses Samsung's own inhouse 16MP ISOCELL sensor and the Snapdragon 805 variants use the Sony 16MP Exmor sensor. In terms of cellular connectivity both the N910C and N910F support the LTE/4G bands as they are both international devices. GPS coverage is probably about the same too.
Hello,
thanks a lot for your explanations