Related
http://www.samfirmware.com/apps/blog/show/5196562-samsung-starts-froyo-updates-
Check out this thread for FROYO by SamFirmWare
Code:
Samsung Starts with Froyo updates next week.
They start with Europe.
After Europe the will go to Asia and Africa.
Every Galaxy S user could update his device with Samsung Kies.
Or with our way. (ODIN)
The firmwares will be XWJPA or XXJPO. (For Europe)
Both firmwares leaked on our website already.
So if you want you could download them and update your mobile!
Good Luck!
Remember after this Release Samsung keep supporting your device!
So please check weekly Samsung Kies or our website!
Why we think this are the KIES releases?
When you checked all newsmessages you find out that Samsung removed JPM from his servers.
A couple of days ago SamsungMobileUK place on his facebook and twitter that they start in begin November till the end of November for all operators.
When we check now the new Firmware versions it could be the new KIES releases. For Europe and Scandinavian.
Every Galaxy S phone will have Android 2.2 before 2011!
We have currently no information for the Samsung I5800 and I5500.
But JPA has many bugs... This is the famous new and fast FW?
I wonder how many will sell their devices if this is true?
almaalma74 said:
But JPA has many bugs... This is the famous new and fast FW?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This has been said over a billion times, no software will be w/o bugs. Even HTC devices are pretty buggy.. Probably the one with the least bugs is the Nexus 1.
SkinBobUk said:
I wonder how many will sell their devices if this is true?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know I won't.
I love the phone and I am on 2.1.
I can't see what's the big deal with froyo. None of the features it brings are groundbreaking (maybe with the exception of flash 10).
I don't think I would upgrade anyway...
allotrios said:
I know I won't.
I love the phone and I am on 2.1.
I can't see what's the big deal with froyo. None of the features it brings are groundbreaking (maybe with the exception of flash 10).
I don't think I would upgrade anyway...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Alot of new apps need 2.2. eg new Gmail app, Youtube app, Skype only seems to work on 2.2 with SGS, to name a few.
Nammmmmmmmmmm
psp888 said:
Alot of new apps need 2.2. eg new Gmail app, Youtube app, Skype only seems to work on 2.2 with SGS, to name a few.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's nice, but I don't think any of these updates are "must have" for me. The changes on the gmail app are not essential for me. I don't use youtube that much and when I use it I find it good enough and the skype implementation is not bringing video calls, so I don't want it.
If and when something amazing comes to 2.2 that I definitely must have, I may upgrade. Until then I would rather see bug fixes than new features as the phone already does a lot!
running jp6 with a modded kernel (341 megs by hardcore!), and its extremely quick and stable! i totally love my sgs the way it is now and have very few things to whine about
i just want samsung to commit on gingerbread for our devices
So, that "fast" FW samfirmware was talking about is going to be just a firmware with less lags than in pulled scandinavian official Froyo? That sucks, because my phone feels laggy (black screens) even on JM9 with Voodoo. And lagfix is the ONLY thing that i need from new FWs.
At least we will have official Froyo.... be happy!
h.robert said:
At least we will have official Froyo.... be happy!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sorry but it's not cool. Samsung seems to have this strange policy to release high-end devices and not provide proper support for them.
Right now I'm using JPK with OCLF and Launcher Pro Plus and I'm happy with my phone. But both OCLF and Launcher Pro are third party apps.
There are tons of lagfix solutions and custom ROMs that are better than the stock ones.
Customizing your device must be a choice and not a necessity so you can get decent performance on a top-notch hardware.
And I keep getting the feeling that they leak ROMs intentionally and use XDA users as guinea pigs. And are using devs to fix the issues...
Sorry that my first post ever in this forum is so negative but I'm getting really mad and impatient with Samsung...
SkinBobUk said:
I wonder how many will sell their devices if this is true?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
after 3 months of waiting i finally decided to sell my loved SGS.
its a good phone, but a buggy one, in my opinion a bit to buggy.
I hope for u all there will be at least this "fast" new ROM out there soon.
Sociopathic said:
I'm sorry but it's not cool. Samsung seems to have this strange policy to release high-end devices and not provide proper support for them.
Right now I'm using JPK with OCLF and Launcher Pro Plus and I'm happy with my phone. But both OCLF and Launcher Pro are third party apps.
There are tons of lagfix solutions and custom ROMs that are better than the stock ones.
Customizing your device must be a choice and not a necessity so you can get decent performance on a top-notch hardware.
And I keep getting the feeling that they leak ROMs intentionally and use XDA users as guinea pigs. And are using devs to fix the issues...
Sorry that my first post ever in this forum is so negative but I'm getting really mad and impatient with Samsung...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, the lagfixes are great, except when they corrupt your IMEI and cause other issues. You do get decent performance without them. The lag patches haven't been flawless either... And yes, despite the crap samsung gets, I used an iPhone 4 the other day, and it was taking MUCH longer to respond to minor things (despite the fact iphones use compiled code, so they should be even more responsive).
In regards to samfirmware, forget about the rumor sites, most of them have been consistently wrong, and haven't been using credible sources.
@Sociopathic: I have a friend with HTC Desire and Froyo for 4 months I guess and he's not happy... he feels that the Froyo update for his phone is not properly made.
My guess is Samsung was not prepared for Andorid's rise. Not even Google. So, we have to be pacient. Good things will come with Android. Samsung is moving slow because is a huge company with a lot of people to decide what and when goes online, each one pushing his interests. Someone wants Froyo so contain this, other that and so on...
Tolisan decided to sell his Galaxy S. He cut the **** and moved on.
Enjoy your Galaxy S or buy something else. I'm happy with mine! Best phone I ever had!
*yawn*
i'm more excited with the post about samsung's intention to make better pc software then kies
Why you complain everytime about bugs?
I use my phone often, and most of all "bugs" are PEBTAC.
(Problem exists between Touchscreen and chair).
But I'm wondering about the not optimized JIT.
Is it so difficult for Samsung to unleash the performance of the 1337 CPU?
And it's strange that they canceled JPM and made just minor changes.
That's what disappointed me
Gohst_oc said:
Why you complain everytime about bugs?
I use my phone often, and most of all "bugs" are PEBTAC.
(Problem exists between Touchscreen and chair).
But I'm wondering about the not optimized JIT.
Is it so difficult for Samsung to unleash the performance of the 1337 CPU?
And it's strange that they canceled JPM and made just minor changes.
That's what disappointed me
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
JPM was possibly only a release candidate in the first place. And we don't know exactly what was fixed anyway. There may have been some less-common major bugs fixed.
In regards to optimising JIT, our JIT might be optimised, but might simply not be optimised for the benchmarks. Remember, most CPU benchmarks only test a small number of instructions.
GOOD NEWS! for Galaxy S owners, the Gingerbread man will be coming to Samsung Most popular smartphone (Galaxy S) Flag-ship.
Remeber, Earlier this Month, Samsung Mobile India Twitter feed tells the fact that the mobile will get Android 2.3 (Screenshot below), The company kept it short and simple with a brief tweet: "Yes we will get gingerbeard on GalaxyS." but no other info announced from the company about the update. As we know Samsung has released the Froyo to All users on Many worldwide Carriers on 11,November 2010 and All of them is Now enjoying Froyo and Waiting to taste the Gingerbread.
Well, Today we Got a Confirmation That Samsung Galaxy S is Getting Another Update probably on February,2011 may be Earlier and this update will have Android 2.3 Gingerbread onboard. Leaked ROMs and Videos may start rolling-out on January so Stay tuned, Enjoy your Froyo... Gingerbread is coming on the way to Make "YouMobile".
Gingerbread brings with it an improved user interface which is slicker and more streamlined, along with better power management. It also boasts one-touch word selection and copy/paste, support for multiple cameras and goodies such as NFC (Near Field Communications).
Source
This is a joke for sure.
My S has Eclair, till this time there is no official froyo upgrade available for my phone and samsung is going to release gingerbread the coming February?
Are we talking about Samsung or about the comedy channel?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
This is the difference between porting (having to program the drivers for about everything) and having a native release (like HTC on N1).
Now that NexusS is in the hands of Google, we can expect faster release!
milro1970 said:
This is a joke for sure.
My S has Eclair, till this time there is no official froyo upgrade available for my phone and samsung is going to release gingerbread the coming February?
Are we talking about Samsung or about the comedy channel?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Froyo has been out since October/early November, officially released by Samsung. Blame your carrier if your not getting the update. Contrary to belief, Samsung is quicker than HTC when pushing out updates, it's just that HTC devices have a much larger userbase on XDA, hence the quicker porting/updating.
2.2.1 has been out officially since September as well on N1,
Tehpriest said:
2.2.1 has been out officially since September as well on N1,
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
N1 is the base on wich they developped the update, don't you think it's normal it gets prior updates?
It is also pretty usual that all the "clones" of N1 will get theses updates pretty fast, since HTC only have to put their bloatware on it and it's pretty much done!
Thanks! Hope this is true.
Is this website a reputable source?
Im just going we can reg hack again for gingerbread
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
2.3 will come officialy probably by the time the phone is phased out.. not all countries have 2.2 yet.
err i will believe when i see leaked firmware of 2.3. Then it shows that they are truly working for a 2.3 release
Billus said:
support for multiple cameras and goodies such as NFC (Near Field Communications).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Both of these are hardware dependant and both the Galaxy S doesn't have. The multiple camera support is for using with taking 3D pictures and/or recording 3D movies. And NFC is there so that android devices can attempt to get ahead of the iphone5 which is said to support it but these needs a dedicated chip.
Seriously, the Nexus S is nearly identical to the Galaxy S, and it takes them this long?
RambJoe said:
Seriously, the Nexus S is nearly identical to the Galaxy S, and it takes them this long?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
takes them how long? the nexus s was released yesterday.
Google can not give the gingerbread code out to companies until it has been officially released.
Meaning no company will have any advantage in the race for gingerbread.
Only advantage samsung has, is gingerbread was built using their hardware
BlackDino said:
Only advantage samsung has, is gingerbread was built using their hardware
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hoping to see some crazy numbers for Linpak once JIT is optimized for Hummingbird..
Wait and see
well the recent froyo release to Bell i9000m owners did some damage to many peoples internal SD cards. Wonder what gingerbread will do to them...(melt them!)
Ah well, God knows I will try anything to get this device to function properly - I really do love it - but cant stand the issues it has.
fablife said:
well the recent froyo release to Bell i9000m owners did some damage to many peoples internal SD cards. Wonder what gingerbread will do to them...(melt them!)
Ah well, God knows I will try anything to get this device to function properly - I really do love it - but cant stand the issues it has.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have had one problem with this phone since purchase in September. You need to try a custom rom with a kernel upgrade, not like there is any lag in stock JPU.
I don't get how so many people complain about this great device when it can be pimped out within 30 minutes.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Some Galaxy still don't have an official Froyo update yet. And the ones that do are still laggy. The 2.2.1 is finally a ROM that isn't laggy but its not official its a leak.
If Samsung comes out with Gingerbread they will screw it up. I'd rather have the community come up with a basic Gingerbread that works. And the community will do it long before Samsung does.
dude this is samsung, we all saw what happened with froyo and all the delays.
I have little hope for a febuary release, i say it's closer to june
2.2.1 is a revelation. I have put it on my galaxy s and its no longer laggy, really smooth, new market, lock screen wallpapers etc. Finally its transformed the phone into the powerhouse it always had the potential to be. I urge you all to get 2.2.1 ASAP!
http://www.pocket-lint.com/news/38311/android-2-4-april-release-date
in a move that shows there is some kind of cover-up of the mistake of the lack of Android 2.3 devices on the market (aside from the Nexus S) 2.4 will still be called Gingerbread, as the only new feature it adds will be this ability to support dual-core apps on a single-core device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Makes complete sense. Dev's are already using the honeycomb SDK to produce apps made for dual core devices. Google cares more about having the maximum number of apps to be available to as many people as possible rather than having a handful of consumers having the absolute latest edition (and I have to agree with them).
How many stock vanilla android devices are there? Just us and the NS (pretty sure no one gets OTA's the day of except us two). Getting an OS out there for everyone is more important then keeping a relatively small group happy with the latest official build. Besides, the N1 is meant for ROM's. Google want's us to play with them, which is why I own the phone. If you've been waiting for gingerbread, just flash a freaking ROM and be happy.
Gingerbread isn't even that great anyway.
AFAIK Gingerbread suffers different problems:
1. security
2. resets
IMHO google devs are working on them before pushing 2.3 on the nexus one too, making it vulnerable and unstable.
elegos said:
AFAIK Gingerbread suffers different problems:
1. security
2. resets
IMHO google devs are working on them before pushing 2.3 on the nexus one too, making it vulnerable and unstable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yhea i did read about the resets in NS, i'm using GB on N1 but it never resets on it's own.
commodoor said:
Yhea i did read about the resets in NS, i'm using GB on N1 but it never resets on it's own.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The resets may be an issue with the Nexus S hardware, and not with the OS. The Samsung Galaxy S phones have quite a few "issues", just ask any owner of a Captivate. I switched from the Captivate to a Nexus One, it is a much better phone.
commodoor said:
Yhea i did read about the resets in NS, i'm using GB on N1 but it never resets on it's own.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm on CM7 and getting occasional random resets.
Google announced 27. January that OTA for Nexus S coming in 1-2 weeks, I don´t know why, but maybe we´ll see both Nexus One and Nexus S OTA.
I wish people would stop saying "just flash a GB ROM and be done with it", there's more to it than that. The N1 is sort of a reference design for alot of phones out there. A working N1 GB ROM means solid drivers, solid battery life, solid performance, etc.
I also have an HD2, it's running GB but the battery life (and BT stack in particular) is pretty poor. Devs say they won't be able to improve much until there are more GB ROMs they can pick parts from. First on that list is the N1.
There are more than just us Nexus One users tapping their fingers waiting for Google on this.
elegos said:
AFAIK Gingerbread suffers different problems:
1. security
2. resets
IMHO google devs are working on them before pushing 2.3 on the nexus one too, making it vulnerable and unstable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The "reset" issue is specific to the NS hardware. Samsung screwed the pooch on that one. There are plenty of people here running GB roms with out issue.
But I do believe the security flaws recently discovered to have a significant impact on GB's delayed release.
GldRush98 said:
The "reset" issue is specific to the NS hardware. Samsung screwed the pooch on that one. There are plenty of people here running GB roms with out issue.
But I do believe the security flaws recently discovered to have a significant impact on GB's delayed release.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've had plenty of resets on my N1 with CM7
James Bell said:
I wish people would stop saying "just flash a GB ROM and be done with it", there's more to it than that. The N1 is sort of a reference design for alot of phones out there. A working N1 GB ROM means solid drivers, solid battery life, solid performance, etc.
I also have an HD2, it's running GB but the battery life (and BT stack in particular) is pretty poor. Devs say they won't be able to improve much until there are more GB ROMs they can pick parts from. First on that list is the N1.
There are more than just us Nexus One users tapping their fingers waiting for Google on this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My N1 is running a GB ROM with solid battery life, and performance. I don't know about drivers but everything works perfectly and as it should. Almost like I am running an official build of GB. The reboot issue only seemed to occur on CM7.. oddly. And it wasn't frequent enough for me to care.
I thought the HD2 always had pathetic battery life when it came to Android. Mine's did, until I remembered to install SetCPU. It last all day, which is just what I need.
I mean the AOSP was released for gingerbread, so we can get some pretty stable ROM's. No it isn't as good as an official update, but if I wanted to wait for official updates, I would have bought a desire.
Now I'm not sure about this, but I think most ROM's that are cooked are built using the ASOP rather than modified stock ROM's. It isn't worth waiting and complaining for a 100% optimized OTA ROM when there are tons of temporary solutions.
XSafire said:
I mean the AOSP was released for gingerbread, so we can get some pretty stable ROM's. No it isn't as good as an official update, but if I wanted to wait for official updates, I would have bought a desire.
Now I'm not sure about this, but I think most ROM's that are cooked are built using the ASOP rather than modified stock ROM's. It isn't worth waiting and complaining for a 100% optimized OTA ROM when there are tons of temporary solutions.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
dont get ya. do you think desire owners arent using AOSP ginger?
XSafire said:
I mean the AOSP was released for gingerbread, so we can get some pretty stable ROM's. No it isn't as good as an official update, but if I wanted to wait for official updates, I would have bought a desire.
Now I'm not sure about this, but I think most ROM's that are cooked are built using the ASOP rather than modified stock ROM's. It isn't worth waiting and complaining for a 100% optimized OTA ROM when there are tons of temporary solutions.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I bought the N1 because it was great hardware and, most importantly, because it was carrier free. The ability to root and flash the phone is nice in case I ever feel the need to admin yet another Linux machine, but that was certainly not everyones reason for getting the phone.
madman_cro said:
dont get ya. do you think desire owners arent using AOSP ginger?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I simply meant that we receive updates as soon as they are available, and are the first ones to get it. Desire has to wait for HTC to update sense and drivers and all that stuff until they release an OTA.
pfmiller said:
I bought the N1 because it was great hardware and, most importantly, because it was carrier free. The ability to root and flash the phone is nice in case I ever feel the need to admin yet another Linux machine, but that was certainly not everyones reason for getting the phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Touche, although there aren't many people on these forums with the same intentions. I was simply speaking to the masses.
I don't know why release is taking so long...
My N1 resets randomly on CM7.... but luckily I don't have the wonks!
Google will release it when its ready!
we need to find out why ginger bread was taken away and when its going to get released again....ive searched and all i can find on android web sites saying the info about google pulling the plug on the galaxy s ginger bread was from xda but no body on here knows whats going on
its because of a few issues / bugs, and is not finalised / stable enough to be released for kies (samsung are strict on this ) but its still available here on XDA and on samfirmware
They will bring it out when they think its ready for release. I'm happy to wait if they fix the problems and release a decent version.
got-petrol said:
we need to find out why ginger bread was taken away and when its going to get released again....ive searched and all i can find on android web sites saying the info about google pulling the plug on the galaxy s ginger bread was from xda but no body on here knows whats going on
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think there is no way to know why.
Of course there is ppl that knows but it seems not likely that they will post a explanation here, and even if they did someone will always say “no the reason is this or that” and the speculations will never end.
just my 2cents.
/qsec
No one has mentioned the front camera orientation bug yet???
I am also glad that they should be working hard on a newer better version right now, whatever the specific problem that got it pulled might have been.
The initial version seemed a bit rushed, being first with a 2.3 update is fine to brag about but I think we'd rather have it done right. I believe I heard somewhere that it shouldn't have even been released and somebody jumped the gun?
azzledazzle said:
its because of a few issues / bugs, and is not finalised / stable enough to be released for kies (samsung are strict on this ) but its still available here on XDA and on samfirmware
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you mean that the official samsung firmwares (the ones released with kies) have less bug than the others ?
Less lag ? Better GPS ?
I've my SGS since July and I'm still waiting for an official GPS fix
Gingerbread was announced for march, then delayed for april, and now we don't have any schedule...
Same story than the froyo update, with the difference that they now are trying to charge Google for the delay.
Where is SamsunJohn ?
herbert1 said:
Do you mean that the official samsung firmwares (the ones released with kies) have less bug than the others ?
Less lag ? Better GPS ?
I've my SGS since July and I'm still waiting for an official GPS fix
Gingerbread was announced for march, then delayed for april, and now we don't have any schedule...
Same story than the froyo update, with the difference that they now are trying to charge Google for the delay.
Where is SamsunJohn ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You haven't tryed GB yet eh?
Do you mean that the official samsung firmwares (the ones released with kies) have less bug than the others
Thats the only official path others are might be or might not be the real deal .
Kies will release firmware that has been branded /adapted by the network supplier . Basic unbranded phone get the vanilla update .
If the update is xxbb version then it will be the same as xxbb verion from other sources .
JVB lets call it still beta has slightly better performance than the almost no lag 2.2.1 that is i dont require a lagfix for either .
GPS is i reckon about 10% better compared to 2.2.1 > 11 sats found compared to 7 on 2.2.1 is the cold boot average for me .
Battery life looks to be better as well .
jje
Will galaxy s get 2.3.4 with the video calling? And do you think we will get tw4?
Galaxy S - no point in writing rom or kernel constantly changing!
No no and no samsung will not release tw4 because of sales to the galaxy s 2 I don't think they will sell as many as the galaxy s 1
Why wouldn't we get 2.3.4?
Galaxy S - no point in writing rom or kernel constantly changing!
look how long it has took to get 2.3.3 and even that is not available world wide and it is still in BETA mode.
2.3.3 will be the last official update from samsung.
but im sure in time we may get 2.3.4 and higher if the devs keep interest and dont move on to another device
SGS 1 has had unofficial - custom 2.3.3 since before the 2.3.3 rumours started, so have faith
CM7 on SGS is 2.3.4 already
While I doubt Samsung will release 2.3.4, possibility of that is in my opinion higher than releasing official TW4 for SGS.
TW4 has been ported from the SGS 2, and is available in development section.
so wouldnt that satisfy your cravings for now ??
Most likely .
2.3.3 or even .4 when its sorted uploaded to servers .
Future SGS 2 updates first lets say to 2.5 .
SGS 1 will get 2.5 at a later date once differences are removed .
But really it all depends upon how long Samsung want to continue building and selling SGS 1 . If costs are right for the build then i can see Samsung dropping the cost and making the SGS1 a mid market product .
But all the talk is hissing in the wind as we are not Samsung .
jje
Anyone, any idea on wifi direct being introduced to galaxy s like they said it would be or your think it will only be available to s2?
Galaxy S - no point in writing rom or kernel constantly changing!
11111111111111111111111111111111111
111111111111111111111111111111111
azzledazzle said:
2.3.3 will be the last official update from samsung.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
stop talking like you know this for sure. you have no clue.
airf0rce said:
CM7 on SGS is 2.3.4 already
While I doubt Samsung will release 2.3.4, possibility of that is in my opinion higher than releasing official TW4 for SGS.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It not stable though
I don't get the point.....tw4 and 2.3.4 are already available as ports or independent development and IMHO custom ROMS have always been faster and better than original...even 2.3.3 is not still available in many countries, so what's the reason to wait longer for the original ??
gbnz said:
I don't get the point.....tw4 and 2.3.4 are already available as ports or independent development and IMHO custom ROMS have always been faster and better than original...even 2.3.3 is not still available in many countries, so what's the reason to wait longer for the original ??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well not many people have the time or want to risk bricking their phone. I completely understand. Before I started flashing roms I waited patiently for Samsung to issue an update to deal with the lag.
+1
jangyelo said:
Well not many people have the time or want to risk bricking their phone. I completely understand. Before I started flashing roms I waited patiently for Samsung to issue an update to deal with the lag.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Galaxy S - no point in writing rom or kernel constantly changing!
evil-doer said:
stop talking like you know this for sure. you have no clue.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i know a guy, whos uncles sister, had kids with this man from the US. and his cousins room-mate was once engaged to a woman who slept with a man who works at samsung...
so yes i do have a clue
is tw4 available for cm7?
suay said:
is tw4 available for cm7?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CM7 is Pure Android, so no TW4 or anything from Samsung.
Bah.. Love to see that workin on cm7
Is cm7 bug free and every thing works
it still has bugs, biggest one being battery drain.
majority of things work, there are still things such as MKV playback and 720p recording.
these will be fixed soon hopefully